Multiple users under one roof for Nike+

Hi
I more than one of us in the family want to use Nike+ do we need two Nanos or two nike+ kits, or is one sufficient? Multiple accounts? How does this work?
Thanks

You can indeed use a single iPod Nano with multiple Nike Sensors & Receivers. That is what I just tried out. My girlfriend and I share one Nano and attach our respective receivers to it. Each of our Nike shoes has a sensor in it. When you sync back to iTunes, it recognizes the second sensor and allows you to name each one. You can then sync each one's respective data back to the Nike site. We have just started using it, but it seems to do exactly what we want.
I suspect that if we wanted we could also use separate sensors in our shoes with a single receiver, but this way with two receivers makes more sense to me.

Similar Messages

  • Multiple users under one itunes account

    I have multiple mac's (both desktops and laptops) as well as multiple iphones and ipads at home.  I am limited in itunes to only 5 devices - what should i do?  set-up a different itunes account for my kids (but then they will not be able to access the music and movies that have already been purchased).
    Unsure how to best set-up 4 people (with each having an iphone, ipad and mac) itunes.
    Any suggestions?

    Ideally, each will have their own iTunes account.
    I am limited in itunes to only 5 devices
    Each iTunes account is limited to 5 computers but 10 devices.
    So you can have content from one iTunes account on 5 computers and also 5 iDevices.
    set-up a different itunes account for my kids (but then they will not be able to access the music and movies that have already been purchased).
    Yes, they will. Just authorize each computer for the other iTunes accounts.
    Make sure you go to iTunes prefs > Store and disable Automatic downloads.
    Also disable it on the iDevices in Settings > iTunes and App stores.
    You can share content between users/libraries by using Home Sharing.
    See this -> Understanding Home Sharing

  • Can multiple users share one file for iphoto

    I want to be able to have all the user profiles on our iMac access the same files for iPhoto, so when one user adds photos they are there for anyone who logs on.

    For iPhoto 09 (version 8.0.2) and later:
    What you mean by 'share'.
    If you want the other user to be able to see the pics, but not add to, change or alter your library, then enable Sharing in your iPhoto (Preferences -> Sharing), leave iPhoto running and use Fast User Switching to open the other account. In that account, enable 'Look For Shared Libraries'. Your Library will appear in the other source pane.
    Any user can drag a pic from the Shared Library to their own in the iPhoto Window.
    Remember iPhoto must be running in both accounts for this to work.
    If you want the other user to have the same access to the library as you: to be able to add, edit, organise, keyword etc.
    Quit iPhoto in both accounts. Move the Library to the Users / Shared Folder
    (You can also use an external HD set to ignore permissions, a Disk Image or even partition your Hard Disk.)
    In each account in turn: Double click on the Library to open it. (You may be asked to repair the Library Permissions.) From that point on, this will be the default library location. Both accounts will have full access to the library, in fact, both accounts will 'own' it.
    However, there is a catch with this system and it is a significant one. iPhoto is not a multi-user app., it does not have the code to negotiate two users simultaneously writing to the database, and trying will cause db corruption. So only one user at a time, and back up, back up back up.

  • Can multiple users use one drive for time machine

    I have an older G4 which I have put a 500mb drive into. I want to put it on the newtork and use it as a time machine. Do I need to partion the drive, such that each user has there own partition? Or just one large partition and allow users access?
    Thanks

    see if this user tip can help: http://web.me.com/pondini/Time_Machine/26.html
    JGG

  • Find my Friends : Support for multiple users under the same Apple ID?

    Can multiple users under the same Apple ID use the app to find each other?  My daughter uses my Apple ID with her iPod touch which allows me to monitor her purchases but it seems that only one device under an ID can use the app at a time.  If that is the case then it is a major disadvantage and I will need to go back to using latitude (or Find My iPhone which also allows me to see where all of my devices are at the same time)

    http://isource.com/2011/10/16/how-do-you-set-up-icloud-for-a-family/
    This worked for me.

  • Can i install itunes multiple times on one computer for multiple users?

    Can i install itunes multiple times on one computer for multiple users?

    Like most applications you only need to install it once for it to be available to all users. (That said it is possible to install an application and only make it available to the current user, but that's rarely needed.)
    tt2

  • Multiple Schemas under one user account with XE 10g

    Hi,
    I am using (learning) XE 10g. I would like to know if it is possible to have multiple schemas under one user account and have the schemas logically separated. As of right now, I have three schemas that I am working with, each one under a different user account. This is inconvenient, because I have to logout of one user account and login to another user account simply to be able to work with another schema.
    Thanks

    It isn't possible to have multiple schemas under one database user account. It is of course possible to grant rights to other database users, and or roles, in order to allow access to the tables/data from other accounts. In Oracle there is a one-one mapping between schema and user.
    Niall Litchfield
    http://www.orawin.info/

  • How can I have multiple users on one apple id?

    How can I have multiple users on one apple ID?
    ie: I have my apple ID with my own credit, how can I set up credit for my son under the same apple ID, so that he can still access the same apps I've already downloaded and paid for?

    I've been trying to figure out a clean way to do this too. I think you may need more than one Apple ID – one that is shared and used to purchase "sharable" items and then "individual" Apple IDs for you and your son. That's the idea that I'm pursuing for the moment.
    It seems that there must be a way to do this, App Store purchases for the Mac are licensed across multiple machines. iPhone app purchases have "all your devices" licensing. Makes me think that Apple has a process in mind for sharing an account (or associating a device with multiple accounts).
    Other things I've learned:
    - Apparently you can't merge Apple ID accounts. I asked about this once at an Apple Store and was told that there was no way to do it.
    - If you share an Apple ID the Messages app behaves in a somewhat surprising manner. It must use your Apple ID to decide where messages should be sent because all users get all messages. This can make it very hard to organize a surprise party :-)

  • Can I put more than one user under one Apple ID account. I want to let other family members use imessage on their own Apple device. Or is there another way to get this end result?

    Can I put more than one user under one Apple ID account. I want to let other family members use imessage on their own Apple device. Or is there another way to get this end result?

    You can seach the net for solutions like this one http://appletvvpn.com/how-to-connect-apple-tv-2-to-vpn/ another idea is to use a PC as the control and fit that with a wireless card and set up a ad hoc wireless network that the Apple TV uses. 

  • Advise on using DBMS_XA with multiple branches under one global transaction

    Dear all
    I need some advise on using DBMS_XA from PL/SQL with tightly coupled multiple branches under one global transaction. Basically, I've successfully written some PL/SQL code that in 3 different sessions attaches to 3 different branches of one global transaction and before ending each branch they can see each others uncommitted data. So far so good.
    However, I'm not sure I completely understand how each branch must call xa_end, xa_prepare and xa_commit correctly using two phase commit and my calls result in errors like:
    ORA-24767: transaction branch prepare returns read-only (XA error code 3 = Transaction was read-only and has been committed)
    ORA-24756: transaction does not exist (XA error code -4 = XID is not valid)
    ORA-02051: another session or branch in same transaction failed or finalized
    This is the structure of my programs (3 SQL*Plus sessions):
    main: Uses xid 123|0 (branch 0 of global transaction 123). This should be the coordinator that commits using two phase commit across the 3 branches
    m1.xa_start tmnoflags
    m2.DML
    m3.Wait for thread A + B to manually be started and run xa_end
    m4.xa_end tmsuccess
    m5.xa_prepare
    m6.xa_commit false
    thread A: Uses xid 123|A (branch A of global transaction 123)
    a1.xa_start tmnoflags
    a2.DML -- thread A can see main and thread B's data
    a3.xa_end tmsuccess
    a4.xa_prepare -- required?
    a5.Should we also call xa_commit false?
    thread B: Uses xid 123|B (branch B of global transaction 123)
    b1.xa_start tmnoflags
    b2.DML -- thread B can see main and thread A's data
    b3.xa_end tmsuccess
    b4.xa_prepare -- required?
    b5.Should we also call xa_commit false?
    The failing steps are:
    m5
    m6
    a4
    a5
    b4
    b5
    Before starting calling xa_end I see 3 rows in V$GLOBAL_TRANSACTION, eg (hex 7B = decimal 123):
    FORMATID GLOBALID BRANCHID BRANCHES REFCOUNT PREPARECOUNT STATE FLAGS COUPLING
    203348753 0000007B 00000000000000000000000000000000 3 3 0 ACTIVE 0 TIGHTLY COUPLED
    203348753 0000007B 0000000000000000000000000000000A 3 3 0 ACTIVE 0 TIGHTLY COUPLED
    203348753 0000007B 0000000000000000000000000000000B 3 3 0 ACTIVE 0 TIGHTLY COUPLED
    Thanks a lot in advance.
    Cheers
    Finn

    OK, I've figured it out. This is poorly documented as it's not well explained how to handle the various return codes. Turns out that all but the last xa_prepare calls return dbms_xa.xa_rdonly (tightly coupled branches are combined -- "read only" optimization), the last one returns dbms_xa.xa_ok and this is when you should call xa_commit.
    Now my next problem is that DBMS_XA doesn't work from within jobs (DBMS_JOB and DBMS_SCHEDULER), which makes it very difficult to use DBMS_XA. My purpose of using DBMS_XA is to coordinate work across multiple sessions in one transaction but if I can't easily create the multiple sessions, I'm stuck.
    When called from a job, xa_start throws:
    ORA-24789: start not allowed in recursive call
    on Oracle 11.2. In Oracle 11.1 it works, but xa_end fails with
    ORA-25352: no current transaction
    so I guess in fact the xa_start call didn't really work either, even though it returned tm_ok.
    I'm now trying to find a workaround on how to use DBMS_XA from within jobs, please comment if you have any suggestions. Or if you have any suggestions on other means of establishing the concurrent sessions (I wouldn't like to resort to external programs that need username/password to connect as password management would be a security issue).
    Thanks in advance.
    Cheers
    Finn

  • ITunes library synchronization across multiple users on one computer

    I've got a PC running MS XP/Home, with a separate user account for each family member. I also repointed all the iTunes library file pointers to the SAME file on the "D" hard drive (taking all that pressure off the "C" drive, which is filling up!)--so each iTunes incarnation for each user points to the same (master) file.
    But when I download music from the Music Store into the library from my user account, it doesn't show up in the iTunes library listing when my daughter logs in using her account--and she can't download it to her iPod.
    Why? I bought it for her; why should she have to download it? It's all on one computer!
    Is it that iTunes really can't handle multiple users on one computer??????? I don't get it...this isn't any copyright or license issue.
    I'd appreciate any tips to get the iTunes on one user's account to "restudy" the library to see if it's been changed by another user. We're all one family on our one computer!
    --DaveTh
    VAIO   Windows XP  
    VAIO   Windows XP  

    See this thread for answers: http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=1285867#1285867
    Post back here with questions if you have any.

  • Can you have multiple users on one apple Id and utilize iCloud?

    My family shares an apple Id and we each have multiple Apple devices. When we use iCloud we "cross pollinate" each others devices with contacts, calendar events, etc.  is it possible to manage multiple users on one apple Id with iCloud activated or are separate ID's required?

    iCloud isn't designed as a multi-user service. Either you all have the same ID, and all your data is available to everyone, or you all have separate IDs and keep your data separate. You can share calendars, so that for example you could all have your own calendars but have one which is common to everyone:
    http://help.apple.com/icloud/#mm6b1a9479
    If you want to share contacts you will have to do it manually. If you want to do file transfer you will have to find a third-party alternative.

  • Allowing multiple users on one Skype ID

    I was wondering if allowing multiple users online one Skype ID is possible, I currently run a small business, where the majority of the customers use skype just for text chatting, not the call features.
    I was looking to hire employees, but use the same skype thats associated with my current reputation. It also helps when I get return customers, since it'll be available to all workers.
    The last 2 times I tried setting this up, my skype got locked, and I wouldn't be able to afford for it to get locked.
    I was wondering if anyone had any suggestions about the feasibility of this.

    Being doing this idea for years and really was hoping for more development.
    Bottomline when a call comes in and either I answer the call or let my staff answer the call. Then later i can see what happened.
    Unfortunity each new call is not populating outlook with an automactic new record so notes could be made.
    Currently we name the client with notes on back end eg: John Smith ..wants to buy main street call back asap.
    This is crazy way to make notes on incoming calls but there no was to conert to a task or an appointment.... One day .....i can only dream.

  • Multiple subnets under one vlan

    Hi everyone,
    Is there any way to create multiple subnets under one VLAN ? Right now, I am using VLAN 110 and it's IP is 172.16.0.1/16.
    We have three types of devices on this VLAN.I want to create 3 or 4 subnets for those devices under this VLAN for reducing the traffic or broadcast ?
    Please advise me.....
    Thanks in advance

    Mohammed,
    As long as you have a single VLAN only, you will not reduce the amount of broadcasts in this VLAN by using several IP networks. Even if the stations are in different IP networks within a single VLAN, every broadcast will be sent across the entire VLAN to all stations, regardless of their configured IP address. Broadcasting is a matter of Data Link Layer, or Layer2, and if you keep a single Layer2 domain (the VLAN), you will keep a single, merged, large broadcast domain.
    Just to answer your question, you could assign multiple addresses to an interface in a single network/VLAN by using secondary IP addresses, for example:
    interface Vlan110
    ip address 172.16.0.1 255.255.0.0
    ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 secondary
    ip address 10.20.30.1 255.255.255.0 secondary
    However, as I explained, this will only allow you to "stretch" multiple IP networks over a single broadcast domain so there is no saving in terms of broadcasts or traffic reduction. For that, you must resort to multiple VLANs.
    Best regards,
    Peter

  • Adding multiple users into one security group at one shot

    Hi,
    Is there any way we can add multiple users into one security group at one shot into PWA.
    For example: I want 100 create 100 users in EPM and Providing them with custom define Team defined permissions and can I add Time sheet Manager as well while creating bulk user through resource template in Project server 2010.
    Thanks,
    Prashant

    Hi Prashant,
    In order to add users in a security group, you can open the group, select all the appropriate resources (pressing CTRL key) and add them to the group. There is no other easy way. Otherwise a powershell script could do the job.
    For the timesheet manager, if all the 100 resources have the same timesheet manager, you can go to the resource center, select the resources (sorting by resource ID will give you together the latest resources added), bulk edit the resources and select the
    timesheet manager for the selected resources.
    Hope this helps,
    Guillaume Rouyre, MBA, MVP, P-Seller |

Maybe you are looking for

  • Logon not possible (error in license check)

    we did a system copy and then the temporary license expired. the permanent license which is installed on the system is valid for the original system so is not working. Due to the expired temporary license we cannot now get onto the system except usin

  • MVKE table updation through MM17 mass maintainence.

    Hi Experts, I need some input regarding mass maintenance of material. The input field 'Product Hierarchy' is present in 'Basic data' (MARA-PRADHA) and in 'Sales View' (MVKE-PRODH). As per standard SAP if I do changes through MM02 in Basic data, the f

  • Cannot shut off computer with powerr on/off switch

    Dear friendly  Computer Geeks, My computer is an HP desktop , product s5-1110, microprocessor Intel Pentium CPU g620 @ 2.60 GHz , Bios 7.16 , usb input device, hard drive st31000524as, windows OS 7. The computer crashed , I could not determine the re

  • Email message from PC users is blank

    I get email from mac users just fine. However, when a colleague on a PC emails me it's a blank email with my quoted first email underneath. However, if I hit reply, I see the message.

  • Images come in too large in Appleworks 6.2.4

    I scan a paragraph from a newspaper in Photoshop, save as PICT, insert into AW and it comes in about the size of my fridge! I use "scale by percent" to reduce size and then it is unreadable. Word inserts the image at acctual size. Is there a way to i