Multiple vendor certificates for multiple deliveries

Hello all,
I am working on vendor certificate receipt against delivery.
The settings have been done. It is working fine for the first delivery. If I enter certificate recvd as Yes then the inspection lot gets status as CORK.
Problem comes when we acknowledge another delivery against the same PO. At that time in MIGO the option of certificate diappeares. However the first certificate received is only effective this delivery too. How to overcome this issue.
I can't go for separate PO for this.
Mimiri

In QCC0>QM in Proc->Define Keys for certificate processing-->define certificate type--
>have you not selected "certificate per GR item" for selected Certificate type.

Similar Messages

Is it possible to use single ssl certificate for multiple server farm with different FQDN?

Hi
We generated the CSR request for versign secure site pro certificate
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}
SSL Certificate for cn=abc.com considering abc.com as our major domain. now we have servers in this domain like www.abc.com, a.abc.com , b.abc.com etc. we installed the verisign certificate and configured ACE-20 accordingly for ssl-proxy and we will use same certificate gerated for abc.com for all servers like www.abc.com , a.abc.com , b.abc.com etc. Now when we are trying to access https//www..abc.com or https://a.abc.com through mozilla , we are able to access the service but we are getting this message in certfucate status " you are connected to abc.com which is run by unknown "
And the same message when trying to access https://www.abc.com from Google Chrome.
"This is probably not the site you are looking for! You attempted to reach www.abc.com, but instead you actually reached a server identifying itself as abc.com. This may be caused by a misconfiguration on the server or by something more serious. An attacker on your network could be trying to get you to visit a fake (and potentially harmful) version of adgate.kfu.edu.sa. You should not proceed"
so i know as this certficate is for cn=abc.com that is why we are getting such errors/status in ssl certficate.
Now my question is
1. Is is possible to remove above errors doing some ssl configuration on ACE?
2. OR we have to go for VerisgnWildcard Secure Site Pro Certificate for CSR generated uisng cn =abc.com to be installed on ACE and will be used for all servers like www.abc.com , a.abc.com etc..
Thanks
Waliullah

If you want to use the same VIP and port number for multiple FQDNs, then you will need to get a wildcard certificate. Currently, if you enter www.abc.com in your browser, that is what the browser expects to see in the certificate. And right now it won't beause your certificate is for abc.com. You need a wildcard cert that will be for something like *.abc.com.
Hope this helps,
Sean

Vendor invoie for multiple POs with different payment terms

Hi,
We have a vendor which send a single invoice for multiple POs which have different payment terms. Now if we create a single invoice in MIRO, then only a payment term can be applied.
However user want to pay to the vendor corresponding to the PO terms.
Please let us know any way apart from creating multiple MIRO documents.
Regds,
Nand

Hi,
You can achieve so in standard SAP.
Go to OBY6 and activate the check box "Enable Amount Split" in your company code. Then in MIRO, a new tab will appear in the header as "Amount Split"
In this tab, you can split the vendor invoice in multiple lines with respective payment method and payment term.
I hope this will help you.
Regards,
Gaurav

Is it possible to combine multiple Pur Reqs for multiple materials to one vendor into one PO through MD07?

We have material planners who use MD07 (traffic signal screen) Stock/Requirements List, Collective Access tab to review material requirements by MRP Controller. Once the list is created, they select individual materials and review them in MD04. In a lot of cases, Purchase Reqs (PRs) are reviewed and adopted into POs individually for each material. Sometimes they will combine multiple PRs for one material into one PO. This is a good practice. However, from what I have found, it is not possible to combine multiple PRs for multiple materials into one PO. If this was done it would dramatically reduce the number of POs that we are issuing to suppliers. Problem statement: We issue too many POs which causes additional influxes down the line (receiving dock/goods receipts processing, receiving issues, invoices, invoice issues, etc.). Does anyone know of a way to address this problem without a major overhaul in approach or customization of the system? Thank you in advance!

Hello Michael
As far as I know, this is not possible directly from MD07, only from the MM transactions.
The following thread suggests the following procedure to convert several PRs into one PO:
Conversion of multiple PR into single P.O
Drag and drop the first PR from the item overview to the shopping card on top of ME21N,
then open the PO detail delivery schedule tab and drag and drop all other PR to the shopping card shown in the schedule tab
You can use the same procedure, calling the order conversion from MD07 and then drag and drop another PRs into this PO.
BR
Caetano

Same vendor code for multiple company codes

Can we have same vendor code for two different company codes ?

Yes u can use same code of vendor in different company code
only u will have to extend this vendor code to other company code in xk01
this is possible as number range is set on vendoe Account group
and same vendoe code and be used in 2 or many different co codes with different company code data
hope this helps
Edited by: Umakant Bhangale on Oct 11, 2010 5:35 PM

Renew Machine Certificate for multiple Servers

Hi,
We have Windows 2003 Enterprise CA which issues certificates to servers which are used for various purpose like Wifi Authentication, Secure RDP. We have checked that the certificates are going to expire within few weeks. We want to renew certificates before
expiry but the number of servers is high so we cannot do it manually by logging into each server.
We doesn't have ACRS enabled for computer certificates and even if we configure it now that will not help.
Is there a way to renew the certificates for all the servers remotely.

On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 11:39:43 +0000, Sukhwin08 wrote:
We already have auto-enrolment enabled through GPO. The settings are as follows
Automatic certificate management........ Enabled Option Setting Enroll new certificates, renew expired certificates, process pending certificate requests and remove revoked certificates .........Enabled
Update and manage certificates that use certificate templates from Active Directory ..........Enabled
I think that you're confusing Automatic Certificate Request Services and
autoenrollment. In your first post in this thread you mention ACRS, however
the above settings are for autoenrollment. ACRS is only for certificates
that are based upon V1 certificate templates and then only for machine
certificates. Autoenrollment on the other hand does not work for anything
less than V2 certificates and supports both machine and user certificates.
If you're using V1 certificate templates then you can set autoenrollment
settings in a GPO and it will not have any impact at all.
Paul Adare - FIM CM MVP
Remember the signs in restaurants "We reserve the right to refuse
service to anyone"? The spammers twist it around to say "we reserve
the right to serve refuse to anyone." -- SPAMJAMR & Blackthorn in nanae

Multiple Business Systems for Multiple Receivers?

hi,
idoc > xi -> multiple receivers with xml payload
I have a scenario where i have to configure multiple receivers for each Supplier from an IDOC. All the receivers will be either HTTP or SOAP.
When the mapping would be the same for all the Suppliers but during configuration we have to determine the receiver based on an IDOC value to route the xml via HTTP or SOAP
For this to achieve do we have to create multiple business systems for each receiver?
If i create a receiver in the business service how can we determine the interface mapping in this scenario?
Thanks,
Tirumal

Hi Tirumal,
For this to achieve do we have to create multiple business systems for each receiver?
As you know,Business system is a logical name for the Techincal Systems, Theoretcially it is not required to create different Business systems for the each receivers.
Generally Business Systems are grouped/created based on the Business Process/Functionality/Type of Receivers etc.
So if you think, your each receiver is of type different type/process then create different Business systems.
It depends~
If you create Business Service, then you need to add your Message Interfaces explicitly into the Business Service( By open the Business Service->You can see the Sender/Receiver Interface tabs).
Hope this helps,
regards,
moorthy

Problem of Creating Multiple Communication channels for multiple files

Hi Everybody
I have a very basic doubt but this struck me...
For a file-XI-file scenario,if multiple files are coming from same FTP server but with different names then we have to create multiple communication channels for all the files of different names..but is this a intelligent approach?Can we do something so that only one communication channel can receive multiple files of different names?plz explain in detail if possible ASAP.
I have another doubt as in File-XI-File scenario how the XI understands that a particular file is from this FTP server needs to be send to another particular FTP Server?is it only the name of the file which we give in sender comm channel & receiver comm chaneel which determines this????that means this name should always be same?plz explain in detail if anybody knows?

Thanks Aamir.I understood the solution.
Correct me if I am wrong.......
1)If there are multiple files with different names & different extensions in the sender FTP then we use-->
2)if there are multiple files with different names & different extensions in sender FTP & I want only say files of 2 extension types(say .xml & .txt)then we use-->
*.xml
in one comm channel &
*.txt
in another comm channel rite??
Also I wanted to ask that only two kinda files we can pick up through sender comm channel rite?
.xml and .txt(File content Conversion).Can we pick files of other extensions also?(say .doc,.xls)If we use as u said
then files of all other extensions will also be picked up rite?bt hw will xi convert them into xml?plz explain......
One of my other q is not answered yet.........all these same doubts are there for receiver communication channel.......but you all have not said nething abt the receiver comm channel........plz explain the answers to all these queries for receiver comm channel for a receiver FTP........ASAP......thanks once again.......

Vendor return for multiple material doc

hi experts
we have created a po of multiple line items... vendor has delivered each line item with different excise invoice..
each time we receive the material with respect to po, material document is created which is different for all line items.
if we want to return by selecting return delivery in MIGO, it will allow only one material document. but i want to return partial quantity of material of all line item, which can be done by selecting 122 mov type. But while posting the ETT type is GRPO instead of OTHR, so the excise is captured, instead of reversing excise duty. Part 1 entry is also added instead of deducting.
hope my querry is clear
awaiting ur valuable replies

hi sandeep
thanks for ur reply..
1) The configuration settings is been already maintained.
2) I agree when we select return delivery from drop down list in MIGO, then it is picking ETT OTHR, but it will allow only one material document. ( Please check in MIGO)
I am making return delivery against multiple material document which is been generated at the time of MIGO.(101) for the same PO.
Here i have to go to migo transaction, in drop down list it will be Goods receipt and i should manually select 122 mov type.
here after posting the document it is hitting ETT GRPO instead of OTHR. (please test it)
hope i am clear.

Single Payment through multiple banks/accounts for multiple vendor invoices

Hi,
In R12, is there a way to pay through different Bank Accounts for different supplier invoices in a single go?
I assume, we can do so by creating a PPR, and then assigning payer bank account for each invoice before creating payment instruction.
However, we are looking for a single template setup which can have multiple bank accounts tied to different Pay Groups, and based on invoice pay groups the system automatically selects he bank accounts while creating the payment file.
E.g. We have Inv01 in OU1 with Currency USD, Paygroup USD_PAY, Inv02 in OU1 with Currency EUR paygroup EUR_PAY, Inv03 in OU2 currency USD paygroup USD_PAY & Inv04 in OU2 currency EUR paygroup EUR_PAY. We have seperate Bank Accounts for each currency say EUR_BANK, USD_BANK
Can we create a single template such that for paygroup USD_PAY, bank account USD_BANK can be set up and for paygroup EUR_PAY, EUR_BANK can be setup, so that when we create payment file, we can have them created simultaneously for USD_BANK (Inv01 & Inv03) & for EUR_BANK (Inv02 & Inv04)
Appreciate if someone can share their experience/thoughts
Ashutosh

Hi,
have a look at this thread:
Vendor with Multiple Bank Account in MIRO
Best regards.

SSL certificates for multiple websites

I am having problems with websites recognizing the SSL certificate assigned to said site. For example, I have three secure websites; (1) x.abc.com, (2) y.abc.com, and (3) z.abc.com. All are setup for SSL with associated SSL certificates from a signed authority. However, when I browse to said sites, I receive an SSL mismatch error pertaining to the domain name. For whatever reason, two of the sites want to use the main site SSL certificate.
I have verified that the sites are setup correctly with the proper SSL certificate and restarted web services. Any ideas?
Thanks!

You do this by IP Aliasing the machine
Oh, you were referring to IP Aliases. Sorry. I interpreted your comment as meaning Server Aliases within Apache (where multiple hostnames map to the same virtual host configuration).
My bad.
So we're both right - you need multiple IP addresses on your server (either by duplicating the inteface in System Preferences, or through IPAliases.conf) and you need to bind one SSL site to each IP address (although you could also use different port numbers on the same IP address in Apache).
If you're using NAT you still need multiple public IP addresses that forward to each of the IP Aliases (or virtual hosts).

Creation of multiple PO IDOCs for multiple vendors in one directory

Hi ,
I got a scenario to download all the vendor related PO and RFQ IDOCs to one common directory .i.e EDI Port path: /sap/xxxx.I cannot create partner profile LI for each and every vendor. Would be appreciated if any one can suggest alternative for this.
P.S : Tried by creating output type with partner function LS and partner profile LS.It was not working.
Cheers,
Raj.

Hi
For the scenario described by you, you need not have to make any config settings. The G/L account defined in SPRO (Valn and Automatic Acct Determination) is used for Automatic Account determination i.e. when you do not enter a specific G/L account during Goods Issue.
As can be seen from your query, you want Consumption account to be posted to different G/L accounts but the material is assigned only to 1 Matl type. There are 2 ways to solve this problem:
1. If you know the G/L accounts that the system should post to before hand i.e at the time of Matl creation itself, then you can configure Split Valuation and then assign more than 1 Valuation class to the Matl. For each of these Valn classes, you can configure Automatic Account assignment. By doing this, at the time of Goods Issue, the system will ask you the Valn type and will accordingly post to a seperate G/L account.
This is possible only if the no of G/L accounts per Matl is less (preferably 2-3)
2. If you do not know the G/L accounts before hand or the G/L accounts per Matl consumption is too many, then it is better to go for Manual Automatic Account assignment.
In this procedure, at the time of Goods issue using Mvt type 201, you can specify the G/L account and Cost Centre in Th Account Assignment Tab.
Hope this clarifies.
Thanks

Vendor assignment for multiple line tiems

All,
We are with SRM 5.0, Classic Scenario.
I have created SC with 2 line items and given different vendors for two line items of the same SC.
It should generate two POs for this, right ?
Bt, only one Purchase Req. and PO is created and showing in R/3.
Any inputs please ?
Thanks
Maron

>
Maron, Swiss wrote:
> All,
>
> We are with SRM 5.0, Classic Scenario.
> I have created SC with 2 line items and given different vendors for two line items of the same SC.
> It should generate two POs for this, right ?
>
> Bt, only one Purchase Req. and PO is created and showing in R/3.
>
> Any inputs please ?
>
> Thanks
> Maron
what about the vendor for the purchase request item? is it fixed vendor ? any data incomplete ?

Issuing Multiple MYSAPSSO2 tickets for Multiple Domains

Hi,
I am having a problem understanding the SAP documentation on how to go about issuing SAP login tickets in multiple domains. In the documentation it states that in order to do so, you require either a IRJ or the SAP ISAPI Web Filter installed in on a server in the target Domain. I have now setup the IIS_SSO.dll ISAPI filter in the domain I require the SSO ticket to be issued in however when I make a request to that webserver I do not see the MYSAPSSO2 cookie being created in my browser, I do see in the ISAPI logs that the request has been filtered and the portal username extracted and set to the configured HTTP Header, but no new Cookie created in the DOMAIN.
Can anyone help? Has anyone done something like this before?
Basically I have a portal in the domain myportal.subdomain.domain.com and an ITS in the domain myits.domain.com. With this configuration the MYSAPSSO2 cookie is not sent to the ITS server as it is in a Super Domain. So what I want is to configure the portal to issue a Cookie in the super domain (domain.com) rather then subdomain.domain.com. I thought I could do this with the parameter login.ticket_recieving_hosts in the usermanagment.properties file (EP5) and the IIS ISAPI filter to SSO (IIS_SSO.dll) configured on a website in the super domain (domain.com).
Any help would be greatly appriciated.
Simon.

I believe we had to set the domain relax level (ume.logon.security.relax_domain.level) but needed to make sure this was secure since it changes the domain scope of cookies that are valid for the system.
See the following:
http://scn.sap.com/thread/1534863
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp3/helpdata/en/5e/473d4124b08739e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
Hope this helps.

How to set up multiple log4j configurations for multiple WAR packages?

hi all,
the EAR that i am trying to deploy has multiple WARs.
I need to configure separate loggers for each these WARs.
Could any of experts can help me out.

Hi
Depending on your needs, you may find that Set level offers the best approach:
Within a Set you have the Playbacks (Set Level, so they work for the entire set) with individual patches in the set "live" for the EWI etc as needed.
You need only map one set of controls for all the Playbacks since only 1 set can run at a time.
CCT

Multiple vendor certificates for multiple deliveries

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for