Multiplier 9 with high HTT on MSI NEO4 bugged?

Hi guys,
I have a strange problem with this board.
First my system:
3000+ winnie (No sub-zero bug!)
MSI NEO4 Platinum (Bios 1.2B)
2x512MB GSKILL PC4400
I can run prime stable at 300x9 (180MHz devider).
Under the prometeia I have the oppurtunity to go further.
I hit the 322x9 =2900MHz also prime stable.
http://www.xs4all.nl/~famchow/A64_3.../Prime_2.90.JPG
But after some time, on every moment it give me a BSOD and reboot.
In the bios a max. can set 310MHz in bios to get windows booted, higher I can boot in the bios but reboot before the windows loading screen.
I tryed every settings HTT X1 , 2, 3 and the bandwidth 16/16 8/8. Still nogo.
BUT, when I use MP8, I can boot into windows with HTT 330MHz!!!...
Is this a bios problem or something else?? Maybe this is something for the MSI bios engineers.
THnx
BTW:
to MSI engineers: Check the memory timings settings.
Read preamble, Max async and Trc /Tfrc arent correct when setting. I checked this with A64 tweaker in windows.

I have exactly the same problem. No problem with no OC, MemTest-86 and Prime95 ok.
I saw a excellent article on anandtech.com:  http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.aspx?catid=28&threadid=1497607&enterthread=y
First I tries to detect the max HTT/FSB. According to this article I put the CPU multi to 6, the memory to SPD, 2T and memoryclock to 100.
HTT to 4.0. CPU spread spectrum, PCI-e spread spectrum and SATA to disabled. Vcore 1.50V and Vmem 2.60V
FSB 200 en 210 ok. Then FSB 220 the BIOS doesn't start anymore. THe power- and the HDD-led lights continuous and no image on the screen.
I have to reset the BIOS with the button on the board to get back to normal.
I haven't tried Clockgen. As soon as I have results a report back.
My system specs:
BeQuiet Powersupply 400W, +12V 20A
MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum BIOS 1.1
Winchester 3200+
Leadtek Geforce 6600GT
2 x 512MB Crusial Ballistic PC3200
120 Gb Maxtor
Windows XP Pro S2
nVidia nForce4 standalone driver v6.39

Similar Messages

  • MOVED: Multiplier 9 with high HTT on MSI NEO4 bugged?

    This topic has been moved to Overclockers & Modding Corner. This is the correct area for overclocking stuff. Please take note of that in the future.
    https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=74052.0

    I have exactly the same problem. No problem with no OC, MemTest-86 and Prime95 ok.
    I saw a excellent article on anandtech.com:  http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.aspx?catid=28&threadid=1497607&enterthread=y
    First I tries to detect the max HTT/FSB. According to this article I put the CPU multi to 6, the memory to SPD, 2T and memoryclock to 100.
    HTT to 4.0. CPU spread spectrum, PCI-e spread spectrum and SATA to disabled. Vcore 1.50V and Vmem 2.60V
    FSB 200 en 210 ok. Then FSB 220 the BIOS doesn't start anymore. THe power- and the HDD-led lights continuous and no image on the screen.
    I have to reset the BIOS with the button on the board to get back to normal.
    I haven't tried Clockgen. As soon as I have results a report back.
    My system specs:
    BeQuiet Powersupply 400W, +12V 20A
    MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum BIOS 1.1
    Winchester 3200+
    Leadtek Geforce 6600GT
    2 x 512MB Crusial Ballistic PC3200
    120 Gb Maxtor
    Windows XP Pro S2
    nVidia nForce4 standalone driver v6.39

  • Dual channel with 4 slots on MSI Neo4 Platinum

    I read from the booklet that the dual channel on the MSI neo4 platinum will only run at 333mhz when using the 4 slots with dual sided chips on the Dimms.
    Anyone knows if there's a way to run them dual channel at 400mhz.
    Here's the setup:
    MSI Neo4 Platinum
    FX-53
    2gig (4x512mb) Mushkin special 2-2-2 PC3200
    thanks in advance,
    Marc.

    Quote
    Yes, you get better performance with 1T compared with 2T - check with Sandra mem.benchmark.
    A note for the above: that is for the same timing modules. But
    2-2-2-x 2T would be faster then 3-3-3-x 1T,this is important to realize when considering 2GB.
    4x512 2-2-2-x at 2T would be faster or as fast as 2x1GB 3-3-3-x at 1T and alot of the 1GB modules out there don't have fast timings.

  • MSI Neo4 Platinum with MSI GF6600GT PCI-e Freezes on games

    I'm having this serious problem that my new build system freezes on games. Sometimes I can play for a few hours and sometimes I can play only a few minutes before the system freezes completely. Only a hardware reset helps in this case.
    This is my hardware setup:
    MSI Neo4 Platinum
    MSI GF6600GT PCI-e
    2 x 512MB DDR400 memory(in dual mode)
    AMD 3200+ 64-bit processor
    Sound Blaster Audigy
    DVD Writer
    Floppy
    I'm using Windows XP SP2
    What I tryd:
    Tested with other RAM modules, same trouble
    Reinstalled windows xp, same trouble
    Tryd all kind of driver versions, same trouble
    Flashed bios to 1.9, same trouble
    Put a Zalman Cooler on the Video card (temperature now between 40 and 60 degrees in games instead of 80-100 degrees), same trouble
    This is where my questions come:
    There are two hardware components I cannot switch to try:
    The mainboard and the Video card. Whitch one is most likely to be broken??
    I have read in the manual of the mainboard that the PSU should have at least 18A on the 12+ signal. My PSU only haves 15A there. While I doubt this results in problems like this I still like to know if it does!
    Please help me out on this one! 

    Have tried older drivers for you GFX, I find the late 6XXX work better for most games. You mite want to check the system is stable with:
    Prime95, Memtest86, 3D mark 03 & 05.
    You mite be having the same problems as "easlern", his games would lock up. This was due to to a problem with onboard sound Sound Blaster.
    https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=84328.0
    https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=84328.msg603340#msg603340
    Quote
    At that moment I didn't even know what was actually on my board, but I knew it was a generic card I was probably never going to use anyway, and I didn't recall getting any sound card updates for this board. So I looked in device manager, and bingo: AC97 device under multimedia devices.      I immediately did two things to completely eliminate the rascal: updated the driver for it and promptly went to BIOS and disabled the sucker. Also disabled SATA group 2 (slots 3 and 4), the Marvell LAN because I only use one ethernet anyway (the nVidia one, which from what I was reading, was probably the more robust of the two), both RAID controllers (actually I had disabled them earlier to skip the annoying RAID setup screen), and put the PCIe bus back to 100MHz (rogue: I was wondering about possible damage over time with this too high too, so I was glad to try setting it back to normal!) Also ran Driver Cleaner to rip out the detonators even though I was putting in another nVidia, and then put in the 6800GT and installed drivers. (In case you were interested, my 3dMark05 score went from 3511 under the 6600GT to 4939 under the 6800GT! I now run in 1280x1024 at max effects and I'm completely spoiled in one night already!   )
    Anyway, one of these myriad, desperate attempts must have worked because I get neither audio stutters (should have been a freaking clue in the first place, duh!) nor lock ups.
    Since this is the first PC I've built, I was certain I had to have screwed something up hardware-wise or found some combination that had incompatibilities. If it WAS just the freaking sound card driver I'm going to leave this place in shame and never post again!    In my defense, the MSI Update utility didn't show any updated sound drivers for me, and I had assumed it was being pre-empted by my SB Live in any case.
    I was convinced this problem was (if it is indeed gone) a video card issue but I can't say it ever was without putting the 6600 back in and running for several hours. I'm going to bet it was the AC97 though because nVidia boards have always been fantastic for me, I haven't had any actual motherboard issues, my RAM and CPU are just fine, and Win2k has never let me down.   
    Don't assume anything, though, I've learned.   
    One thing to note: when I was checking out the AC97, I noticed it was *sharing* IRQ 20 with the nForce NIC detector (might have a different name, I can't remember right now). Apparently this is a capability of Win2k to share IRQs but it kind of added to my suspicions anyway.
    I'll let you know how the next few sessions go and whether this issue is still an issue

  • Newbie with MSI neo4 Plat

    hey there,
    my 1st post here.
    MOBO: MSI Neo4 Plat
    Graphic: MSI 7600GS
    CPU : AMD X2 3800+
    power supply: 500W
    recently i got this problem. Randomly my display goes blank, like the PC is on standby. The pc seems to be running but the monitor seems to be set to standby.
    after i restart the PC(only able to do by the reset button, cannot Ctrl+Alt+del) everything seems to be ok.
    the problem seems to occur randomly.
    anyone have any idea what's going on here?
    thanx for reading.
    cheers!

    Quote from: okta on 02-June-06, 00:35:16
    hey there,
    my 1st post here.
    MOBO: MSI Neo4 Plat
    Graphic: MSI 7600GS
    CPU : AMD X2 3800+
    power supply: 500W
    recently i got this problem. Randomly my display goes blank, like the PC is on standby. The pc seems to be running but the monitor seems to be set to standby.
    after i restart the PC(only able to do by the reset button, cannot Ctrl+Alt+del) everything seems to be ok.
    the problem seems to occur randomly.
    What kind of monitor, how is it connected and does it use calibration software.  I've seen this with Samsung (and some OEM brands made by Samsung) monitors, which use Magictune, connected to the DVI port.  Basically Magictune is crap ands clobbers the monitor's EDID info so that it switches to the VGA port - you can check this by plugging in the VGA cable.  Depending on the monitor, it can cause permanent damage to the monitor's firmware which requires a firmware re-burn... or as apparently in your case, temporary damage which is fixed with a reboot.  The only solution is to get a newer version of Magictune.. or dump it completely.

  • [AMD] MSI Neo4-f 3500+ overclock settings

    I have the following setup...
    MSI K8N Neo4-F
    AMD Athlon 64 3500+
    Antec Sonata II with 450Watt SmartPower 2.0 PSU
    PowerColor ATI Radeon X800 GT 256MB
    100GB Maxtor SATA drive
    CORSAIR XMS 1GB (2 x 512MB) 184-Pin DDR SDRAM (TWINX1024-3200C2PT)
    I have been trying to set up my BIOS settings to achieve a nice balance between performance and stability.  I am not seeing great performance at this time (tons of HD paging and slow bootup and application launch times) and when I try to boost the settings at all the system becomes unstable.  Wondering if anyone out there has a similar setup to me and can help me achieve some better performance at a light overclock setting.  There are so many BIOS settings it is difficult to find a good combination which works.
    Thanks in advance.

    Bekoz -
    Hello.  I have the exact same motherboard, cpu, and memory as you!  I'm having no luck with the overclocking and all but gave up.  The best I could get is going from 2.2 stock on the venice 3500+ to 2.4 equiv. to a 3800+.  Please see my old post from another forum below.  I'm wondering since we have the same setup what the best is that you have achieved.  Thanx!!!
    Hi All -
    I'm kinda new to the planet and to actually trying to OC my system but have been reading on this subject for several weeks now and following the guidelines and multiple threads here. I'm not having the best of luck though.  I've been messing all weekend with the overclocking on my MSI Neo4-f board.  I think it either is a crappy board for OC'ing (would like an ASUS A8N SLI deluxe which I hear is good for OC) or I'm not doing something right.  I had no luck with the 1.9 bios (couldn't get it over 240HTT without something going wrong) and flashed back to 1.6 cuz I heard this is a better bios to OC.  I can't get it to post with an HTT over 250 now even though it is 10 better than with the 1.9.  I've tried changing the memory timings from 1T to 2T and CAS from 2 to 2.5 (corsair suggests 2-3-3-6 1T and 2.75V for AMD platforms) and changing the volts and divider.  I originally was running memory at 2.5-3-3-6 2T but had better PC Mark #'s with the 2-3-3-6 1T.  I also messed with the cpu volts and multiplier, as well as the chipset voltage all in different varieties and the best I could get out of my Athlon 64 3500+ venice was only 2.4ghz from the stock 2.2ghz!!!  Not too good compared to what I've read others have achieved here with an Athlon 64 3500+.
    Here's my system specs:
    -MSI K8N Neo4-F motherboard with 1.6 bios
    -Athlon 64 3500+ Venice with ThermalTake Venus 12 fan and artic silver 3
    -1gig Corsair XMS TwinX1024 Dual Channel PC3200 Platinum (2x512) with suggested timings 2-3-3-6 at 2.75 volts
    -EVGA 6800GT OC'ed at 416mhz core and 1.134ghz memory
    -500W p.s. with air-cooled case and two fans
    -XP (32 bit) OS
    Here's my settings in the BIOS right now where my system is stable (let me know if something jumps out at you as being screwed up or not normal):
    -Memory Divider / speed = 166 (from 200 stock)
    -Memory timings = 2-3-3-6 at 2.75volts and 1T (dual channel in slots 1 & 2 for paired memory)
    -HTT / FSB = 240
    -HT multiplier = 4x (960 HT)
    -CPU ratio / multiplier = 10x (2.4ghz CPU from 2.2)
    -VCORE = 1.45v (using 1.4 plus 3.3% over option) for a total of 1.45 volts
    -Memory = 2.75v
    -Chipset NF4 = 1.5v
    -Cool & Quiet Disabled
    -CPU Spread Spectrum Disabled
    -Aggressive Timing Disabled
    I've done the CPU-ID, Memtest, Prime 95, and Super PI tests for quite a while and everything seems stable at these settings now.  I got some higher HTT's and cpu multipliers (10.5x) but system either wouldn't post or windows wouldn't boot all the way or the tests failed in Prime 95 after a few minutes.  Under load, the CPU goes to about 40 degrees and at idle it is at about 32 degrees.
    My scores with the above settings are:
    PC Mark 04 = 4684
    3D Mark 01 = 24433
    3D Mark 05 = 5049
    Any advice or opinions would be awesome.  I can't figure out what my bottleneck is here.  I think the memory I have is great for overclocking, as is the 3500+ Venice.  Also, how do these scores sound for my specs?  Thanx again for everyone's advice and help!

  • MOVED: msi neo4 + 3500 winchester can't overclock

    This topic has been moved to Overclockers & Modding Corner.
    msi neo4 + 3500 winchester can't overclock

    Hello All,
    I'm a real newbie when it comes to overclocking.  I spent some time reading through various technical threads from various forums before I decided to tweak my newly built system.  Found an article by "Some1ne" on overclocking with a NEO4 Platinum and found it to be quite useful.  Last night was the first time I went through with the tweakis and probably didn't do it right or at least get the best possible performance from my components.  Below was what I did from the bios (1.2v) to the best of my knowledge without the system failing to post or crash when running programs or playing games.  Other than 3dmark05, I haven't use any other programs to benchmark the hardware's performance.
    FSB:   225 MHz
    Memclock Index:  200 MHz
    CL2-3-3-5 all other settings on auto
    Memory voltage:  2.85V
    Chipset voltage:  default
    CPU VID:  1.45V
    CPU Voltage:  6.6% OverVID
    CPU multiplier:  11x
    HTT multiplier:  4x
    Aggressive Timing:  disabled
    All "... Spread" settings:  disabled
    3DMark05:  5800+ (don't remember the exact score)
    With the current setup I have, can someone give me some advice on how I can better tweak my system?  Thanks!
    AMD Athlon 64 3500+ (90nm) @2475mhz
    MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum
    Corsair TWINX1024-3200XLPRO 1GB (225mhz 2-3-3-5)
    PowerColor Radeon X850 XT OC@540mhz/1180mhz
    Maxtor DiamondMax 10 250GB SATA
    Plextor 716SA 16X DL DVD+/-RW SATA Drive
    Thermaltake VA3000 Case
    ThermalRight XP-90 with Panaflo 92mm fan
    Antec NeoPower 480W PSU

  • Msi neo4 + 3500 winchester can't overclock

    Problem
    got a msi neo4 platinum with amd winchester 3500+ running on 2200mhz
    want to do some overclocking to 2500-2600mhz
    problem is that when i change SOMETHING in the cell menu, the MB doesnt post anymore.
    even dynamic overclocking isn't working.
    installed latest bios (1.2)
    anyone got results with a 3500 winchester???
    thanks
    Olaf

    Hello All,
    I'm a real newbie when it comes to overclocking.  I spent some time reading through various technical threads from various forums before I decided to tweak my newly built system.  Found an article by "Some1ne" on overclocking with a NEO4 Platinum and found it to be quite useful.  Last night was the first time I went through with the tweakis and probably didn't do it right or at least get the best possible performance from my components.  Below was what I did from the bios (1.2v) to the best of my knowledge without the system failing to post or crash when running programs or playing games.  Other than 3dmark05, I haven't use any other programs to benchmark the hardware's performance.
    FSB:   225 MHz
    Memclock Index:  200 MHz
    CL2-3-3-5 all other settings on auto
    Memory voltage:  2.85V
    Chipset voltage:  default
    CPU VID:  1.45V
    CPU Voltage:  6.6% OverVID
    CPU multiplier:  11x
    HTT multiplier:  4x
    Aggressive Timing:  disabled
    All "... Spread" settings:  disabled
    3DMark05:  5800+ (don't remember the exact score)
    With the current setup I have, can someone give me some advice on how I can better tweak my system?  Thanks!
    AMD Athlon 64 3500+ (90nm) @2475mhz
    MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum
    Corsair TWINX1024-3200XLPRO 1GB (225mhz 2-3-3-5)
    PowerColor Radeon X850 XT OC@540mhz/1180mhz
    Maxtor DiamondMax 10 250GB SATA
    Plextor 716SA 16X DL DVD+/-RW SATA Drive
    Thermaltake VA3000 Case
    ThermalRight XP-90 with Panaflo 92mm fan
    Antec NeoPower 480W PSU

  • Redirection is not happeing with higher version of Fire Fox (v 2.0.0.17)

    Hi,
    We are using sundirectory service (version 6.x) for login authentication via LDAP protocal. On entering the invalid user info on the prelogin page, it should redirect to the prelogin page with an error message, but it's not happening as expected with higher version of firefox(V :2.0.0.17 and above).The user authenticated redirection to prelogin page is happening as expected in IE 6.0 and lower version firefox (V1.0.7).
    Could you please confirm whether sundirectory service or SAM supports the higher version of( V :2.0.0.17 and above) fire fox or Latest fire fox features/bug fixes creating the problem.

    Hi Sheger77,
    Thank you very much for suggesting installation Live Http Headers. I have done like what you suggested. I am able to see the live http headers and rensponse codes.The authentication is hppening correctly.
    below is the authentication response from SAM server user password is wrong.
    HTTP/1.x 200 OK
    Server: Sun-ONE-Web-Server/6.1
    Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 07:05:32 GMT
    Content-Type: text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1
    Cache-Control: private
    Pragma: no-cache
    Expires: 0
    X-dsameversion: Sun Java(tm) System Access Manager 6 2005Q1
    X-autherrorcode: 107.
    below is the authentication response from SAM server user username is wrong.
    HTTP/1.x 200 OK
    Server: Sun-ONE-Web-Server/6.1
    Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 07:49:41 GMT
    Content-Type: text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1
    Cache-Control: private
    Pragma: no-cache
    Expires: 0
    X-dsameversion: Sun Java(tm) System Access Manager 6 2005Q1
    X-autherrorcode: 103
    One thing i did not understand is that the scenario to get the below page with a link "Return to Login page" in the firefox browser v3.0.3.
    Sun Java System Access Manager (Authentication Failed)
    Authentication failed.Return to Login page
    On cliking the Return to Login page, i will get the below page.
    Sun Java System Access Manager (Login)
    This server uses LDAP Authentication
    User Name: Password:
    And a Log In Button.
    This issue is happening with fire fox version browser 2.0.0.16 to till v3.0.3. Is there any chance of client validations restricting. The same code working as expected by the browser MSIE 6.0 and lower version of FireFox(V: 1.0.7). Is there any chance of client side(brower) security updates restricting the redirection to pre-login page. Please suggest.
    Edited by: thims123 on Nov 5, 2008 11:55 PM
    Edited by: thims123 on Nov 5, 2008 11:56 PM

  • Msi Neo4-Fi Temperature Freeze/Shut down

    I have the following motherboard: MSI Neo4-Fi 
    The system was working fine for 2 months. Now the temperature is instantly increases 10-15 C after starting the PC-Mark test, and increases more in this great heat.
    The computer stops on 65-70 C. Everest measure at aux temp 78C, what is this?
    I have checked the cooling, and changed it two times.
    The computer is on 52 C at start in bios.
    Memtest and ghost freezes too after the start.
    The computer contains the following particles:
    MSI Neo4-Fi
    Athlon 64 3200+ E6 Rev. Stock cooler
    Chenbro Gaming Bomb Case  (1*12cm, 2*8cm fan)
    MSI 7600GS VGA Card (Idle temp 36C)
    2x512MB Corsair Value Select PC3200
    Chieftec 410W PSU (Delta Construction)
    WD 320GB Sata HDD
    Plextor Pata DVD+-RW
    Could This be a Motherboard failure ??!??

    forget about the fan blowing on the mobo, it doesn't lower the CPU temperature. you will have to take the heatsink and fan off the CPU, make sure that the plastic foil doesn't cover the thermal compound. clear whatever thermal paste is left on the CPU and heatsing and reapply a thin layer of thermal paste (arctic silver 5 is prefered). put the heatsink back on the CPU, and make sure that you connect the CPU fan to the mobo.
    with 40C in the room, my winchester would never go higher than 52C, overclocked and under full load, with the stock cooling, so you definately have a problem there. if the computer freezes or shuts down, it is because of the thermal sensor from the CPU.

  • Help : MSI Neo4 Platinum (non-SLi)

    Hi,
    I just switch from a long time Asus Intel user to MSI AMD based rig (I am more into video editing & encoding than gaming). I bought a MSI Neo4 Platinum with AMD 3200+ (Venice) and from my old system, I have the Corsair TwinX XMS PC4000 ram and a RAID 0 setup with 2 X WD 74GB Raptor.
    Can anyone help me on :
    1) which slot should I installed my ram in order to run Dual Channel
    2) How do I perform moderate overclocking with this MSI Neo4
    3) which will be recommended HSF for moderate overclocking
    4) Will I experience the 219 BUG when overclocking

    hgled8888,
    They are all good heatsinks, I do not think you will go wrong with any of them.
    As for the BIOS, the difference is Award vs Phoenix. I use mobos from Abit, ASUS, and MSI, you get used to them, if you can get though one BIOS, you will have little trouble getting used to the other.
    As for moving over from "The Dark Side of the Force" over to AMD, welcome to the other side, you will love it and never look back. 
    Take Care,
    Richard

  • Memory not recognized on MSI Neo4 Platinum SLI

    I just installed another 512mb of RAM on this system:
    MSI Neo4 Platinum SLI
    2 x 512mb Corsair XMS XL PRO
    1 x 512mb Corsair XMS XL (the one that doesnt work)
    IDE HDD
    Windows XP PRO
    BIOS, and every program i run that can see system specs shows that the infact all 3 Sticks
    are recognizable. Though...Windows and a program that shows me my physical memory max both
    point out i have only 1 gig of RAM!?
    It's there, just not being used?
    Now the only difference with the XL version and the XL PRO version is the heatspreader,
    everything else is the same....so nothing should be conflicting.
    Since the computer somehow knows all my part's details..im thinking just because
    the new ram doesnt have PRO that it may not be recognized to work together.
    Even so...ram should downclock etc with this motherboard...so this stupid little name
    issue shouldnt cause the computer to ignore the ram!
    I tried switching DIMM slots, no luck.
    Any ideas?

    It's a AMD64 dual memory channel system motherboard/CPU.
    Valid memory populations are
    1.stick in one of the channels .(single mode 64bits)
    1.stick in each channel .(dual mode 128bits)
    2. sticks in one of the channels.(single mode 64bits)
    4.sticks ,2 in each channel.(dual mode 128bits)
    3 sticks is n/a.
    The population on memory controller , it's initialization and modeselection , single/dual mode is chosen by the A64 cpu.
    It's been said that later rev.E cpus can autoselect unmatched population between channels (of e.g 3.sticks) and
    set the whole memory pool in single mode.
    But i have never seen anyone successfully test/run it .

  • My feeble attempt at a MB comparison - Asus A8N-E vs MSI Neo4 Platinum

    Hi all,
    I just thought I'd share a post I just finished submitting at the Asus forum.  Here's my experience, in a nutshell, with both the Asus A8N-E and the K8N Neo4 Platinum:
    I've decided to give up on the A8N-E and Asus (for now) in favor of the MSI Neo4 Platinum.  The layout of the Asus board is top notch, but there are some significant issues with it.
    The CUSL2 turned me into a huge Asus fan, but no more.  After a week of playing with both here's my review:
    Asus A8N-E (v2.0)
    Pro's
    -Superior Layout - See Neo4 cons below.  However, there are two electrolytic capacitors on the back end that had to be nudged out of the way to install my 6600GT.
    -No superfluous features.
    -Stable
    -Performance on par with other nF4 mobos.
    -I love the Ctrl-Esc wake up feature and will sorely miss it.
    Con's
    -Will not run 2225 OCZ Gold Dual Channel RAM any faster than 2325 (bios must be reflashed).
    -Quirky recovery features.  You need the mobo CD or floppy disk.  Also, there was one instance where it failed to post (due to 2225 memory timings) while running v1008 and I kept getting a BIOS checksum error when reflashing with v1008.  Had to reflash with v1006.  Also, one time I didn't get a checksum error, just a lot of beeps.  Clearing the CMOS proved troublesome as shown in the next issue.
    -Cheap battery terminal.  IMO you should not pull the battery when clearing the CMOS with the Jumper (even though the manual says you should).  It doesn't have a lever to eject the battery (just two little teeth holding it in) and my battery lost contact with the terminals when I put it back in.  Afterwards, when I unplugged the PS the settings in the BIOS were reset.
    -Somewhat limited instruction manual.
    -Asus LiveUpdate failed to connect to a server on several repeated attempts.  It never connected successfully.
    -There was no Mobo installation CD in my box!
    -This forum software and layout is really limited and frustrating.
    -It's been three days now and still no reply to my tech support inquery regarding 2225 memory timings.
    MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum (v1.0)
    Pro's
    -Runs 2225 OCZ Gold Dual Channel RAM at 2225, no issues whatsoever.
    -More reliable Bios/System utility.  There's a button to load BIOS setup defaults in case of problems.  Autorecovery feature flashes factory BIOS version embedded in mobo Core Cell chip.
    -Packaging is simply beautiful.  Obviously not a big reason to buy it but trust me, it's exceptional.
    -Extensive instruction manual, test report, and large fold out color diagram of layout.
    -Add-on module with diagnostic LED's.
    -Stable
    -Performance on par with other nF4 mobos.
    -MSI version of LiveUpdate worked flawlessy on every occasion.
    -Cheaper than A8N-E with rebate.
    -Firewire port
    Con's
    -Inferior layout, although still better than others (ie Epox 9NPA+ and ATX power connectors).  SATA connectors get in the way of my HDD's.  x16 PCIe socket sits below x4 PCIe and x1 PCIe slots.  This orientation causes my long 6600GT card to get in the way of the back end of one of my HDD's.
    -Who need's DUAL Lan?  And the ability to run 8 SATA devices is overkill IMO.
    -CPU Heatsink Fan mount backplate is GLUED to the backside of the PCB.  Had to remove it with a credit card and a hair dryer to make room for my Zalman.
    As I'm sure most of your would agree the Memory timing issue with the A8N-E was the deal breaker.  I'm sure in time Asus will get around to fixing this with a bios revision.  The faulty battery interface was also a downer.
    For now, so long Asus!  Good luck A8N owners!
    Jason

    One big pro for the MSI you forgot to mention is this forum.   This is by far one of the best forums for any motherboard manufacturer (if only ATI would get the hint ).
    IMO I like the 8 SATA ports. I have 4 hard drives in my system, and I am desperately needing more. I have one more SATA slot to fill before I am out. Some people are absolute packrats (like me ) and they need the additional hard drive ports. The other benefit is you can end up using this as a low end server board (which I will be doing in the next couple of weeks). It is by far cheaper then getting a system with opterons. Instead I can just get an X2 for alot less, plus I don't have to spend the extra to get registered memory.
    The dual lan can be really help who use ICS. This way they don't have to purchase a router.
    Both of these I don't see as cons, as they really don't cause a problem. For you I just wouldn't list them as pros.
    But thanks for sharing your ideas, hopefully this can become helpful to others who are determining what mobo to buy.
    Have Fun
    Jeremy

  • IOS 5.1 AAC encoded music with "High Efficiency" is not playing

    Hello to all,
    Since I upgraded my iPhone 4 to iOS 5.1, m4a tracks encoded in AAC with "High Efficiency" profile are NOT playing.
    The tracks are playing correctly in iTunes on my MacBook Pro but they are not playing on the iPhone.
    This is a serious and annoying bug because there are millions of users out there who encoded tjeir music this way.
    So, now what? Do I have to re-encode my entire music library using the "Low Complexity" profile from the source CD's, again ???

    Hello,
    i saw no better result, but i did find a solution : i did buy an App reading flac encoded music. Part of my library was flac, part m4a aac+ ... i did rework from my Cds the m4a in flac, (400 in around one month) and that's done ... bad new : it takes more place on the phone ... good new : the sound is always perfect, as it's lossless and free of any brand (not an other m4a) ... good new (2) : i do encode only once (for my Tvix Dvico and my Iphone), so it's faster.
    I think that Apple does not want to pay (anymore) for the Poiko codec, and that's why it does not work anymore since IOS5 ... there was in the (far) past a similar situation with a mp3+ (enhanced) created by Thompson ... very good but noone wanting to pay for it, so not used anymore 
    The iTunes App Flac Player was around 8 euros and works well (not perfect, but good) and the small equalizer is fine. So that's a quick and not so expensive solution (compared to the amount of music not readable).
    I don't thank Apple for this functionnal downgrade, it's anything but fair, but i'm back now in a free situation (no link to a Apple dedicated codec), and then may be more free to choose between I5 and S3 at the end of this year.
    I hope that  this can help someone in a similar situation.
    Regards,
    Lampro

  • How to build a array with high sampling rates 1K

    Hi All:
    Now I am trying to develop a project with CRio.
    But I am not sure how to build a array with high sampling rates signal, like >1K. (Sigle-point data)
    Before, I would like to use "Build Arrary" and "Shift Register" to build a arrary, but I found it is not working for high sampling rates.
    Is there anyother good way to build a data arrary for high sampling rates??
    Thanks
    Attachments:
    Building_Array_high_rates.JPG ‏120 KB

    Can't give a sample of the FPGA right now but here is a sample bit of RT code I recently used. I am acquiring data at 51,200 samples every second. I put the data in a FIFO on the FPGA side, then I read from that FIFO on the RT side and insert the data into a pre-initialized array using "Replace Array subset" NOT "Insert into array". I keep a count of the data I have read/inserted, and once I am at 51,200 samples, I know I have 1 full second of data. At this point, I add it to a queue which sends it to another loop to be processed. Also, I don't use the new index terminal in my subVI because I know I am always adding 6400 elements so I can just multiply my counter by 6400, but if you use the method described further down below , you will want to use the "new index" to return a value because you may not always read the same number of elements using that method.
    The reason I use a timeout of 0 and a wait until next ms multiple is because if you use a timeout wired to the FIFO read node, it spins a loop in the background that polls for data, which rails your processor. Depending on what type of acquisition you are doing, you can also use the method of reading 0 elements, then using the "elements remaining" variable, to wire up another node as is shown below. This was not an option for me because of my programs architecture and needing chunks of 1 second data. Had I used this method it would have overcomplicated things if I read more elements then I had available in my 51,200 buffer.
    Let me knwo if you have more qeustions
    CLA, LabVIEW Versions 2010-2013
    Attachments:
    RT.PNG ‏36 KB
    FIFO read.PNG ‏4 KB

Maybe you are looking for