Multisite UC500

I have two sites, one with a UC560 an another with a UC540. I manually created a VPN tunnle and setup dial peer. The two sites can use 4 digit dialing and have access to the PSTN from each site. Calls from IP Phone to IP Phone work just fine.
However, call forwarding to voicemail (NOAN or otherwise), access to the conference bridge or even dialing CUE directly from the site with the UC540 to the site with the UC560 fails as unknown number.
When calling from the site with the UC560 to the site with the UC540, this is not a problem.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
S.

I think I already have that set as the primary codec. Please view below
UC540:
dial-peer voice 2205 voip
description to Conference Bridge
destination-pattern 707[1-2]
session target ipv4:10.10.200.250
voice-class h323 1
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
fax protocol cisco
no vad
dial-peer voice 2206 voip
description to US Pilot
destination-pattern 399.
session target ipv4:10.10.200.250
voice-class h323 1
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
fax protocol cisco
no vad
voice service voip
allow-connections h323 to h323
allow-connections h323 to sip
allow-connections sip to h323
allow-connections sip to sip
no supplementary-service h450.2
no supplementary-service h450.3
supplementary-service h450.12
sip no update-callerid
voice class codec 1
codec preference 1 g711ulaw
codec preference 2 g729r8
voice class h323 1
call start slow
UC560
voice service voip
clid substitute name
allow-connections h323 to h323
allow-connections h323 to sip
allow-connections sip to h323
allow-connections sip to sip
supplementary-service h450.12
sip
tel-config to-hdr phone-context
registrar server
voice class codec 1
codec preference 1 g711ulaw
codec preference 2 g729r8
voice class h323 1
call start slow
dial-peer voice 2400 voip
description to Denmark
destination-pattern 24..
session target ipv4:192.168.10.1
voice-class h323 1
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
fax protocol cisco
no vad

Similar Messages

How do I config "Roaming" Phones on Multisite UC500

I have two UC520's in two geographically different locations with 7970G handsets configured.
Site 1: 192.168.10.xx
Site 2: 192.168.20.xx
Intersite dialing works just fine and Multisite is configured via CCA with status of UP.
I have one user who will be moving between sites for long periods of time (6 months at site 1 and the other 6 months at site 2).
I want to the ability to phyiscally move his phone from site 1 and plug it into site 2 and have it retain all site 1 settings (understanding the limitations of having that phone statically register to site 1, call park, etc).
UC520's are currently configured for MultiSite full mesh however when I have tested plugging in a 7970 phone from site 1 into site 2's port(s) it does not register.
Under the dated Multisite deployment guide (https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-9568) it states:
"Can I move my IP phone between multiple sites?
Yes. In this case the "roaming" IP phone will be statically configured to register to its home site even if it is physically moved to a remote site. The roaming IP phone will receive all its services, including PSTN & voicemail from its home site, essentially making it a Teleworker phone."
Does anyone have this configured and workding? Am I missing a configuration step outside of having Multisite configured between the two sites and simply unplugging a configured extension from Site 1 into Site 2?
Other than configuring the phones via CCA to their Home UC I cannot see how to "statically" configre them to register with the home site.
Appreciate any guideance.

Jordan,
Firstly, thanks for your continued replies, I really do appreciate them.
For what in theory seemed to be a simple configuration, this one has me pulling my hair a bit and of course it is for a single user!!!
I went with your initial recommendation of changing the Voice VLAN so that each site now has a unique Voice VLAN address range. I then deleted all multisite configs and reconfigured them after the address change had been made.
Touble is I am not able to ping back an forth on the new Voice VLAN range and not quite sure where in the ACLs I need to modify or add the new Voice VLAN info (again all configuration has been done through CCA so it has made all updates)
I have now:
Site 1:
Data: 192.168.10.xx
Voice: 10.1.1.xx
Site 2:
Data: 192.168.20.xx
Voice: 10.1.2.xx
I am able to do intersite dialing between the two using (Intersite Digit)-(Site ID)- (Extension) and calling back and forth works fine.
When I move a phone that was configured to Site1 and plug it into a switch port in Site 2 it does not register
I update the TFTP to use address of 10.1.1.1 (Site 1's TFTP Server) it still does not sucessfully register.
I am able to ping:
Data - Site 1 - to - Site 2
Site 2 - to - Site 1
(all good here)
Voice - Site 2 - to - Site 1 but not the other way around.
Obviously I need to include 10.1.2.xx in the range of IP's that can be seen throught he VPN however I do not know where to make those modifications. Do you have any suggestions on that or a good place where I can find that documented?
Also in this configuration should the "Teleworker Phone" option be checked for the extension that will be statically configured to it's home site?
Any direction would be greatly appreciated.

UC500 Multisite manager error in CCA

I am getting message when I click on Multisite Manager within CCA
"Multisite Manager was not able to retrieve the current configuration
Please make sure that device descovery has completed and then press Cancel below and restart Multisite Manager
If the problem persists, please contact Cisco support for further assistance"
I have already reset the UC540 to factory default but getting same error message, also update Java. can anyone advise
Thanks
Hasrat

Hi Shawn,
Multisite manager is used to configure a VPN that allows calls between 2 or more UC’s. New additions to CCA allow the multisite manager to also create just a data VPN without the dial plans to another router.
The multisite manger will configure the crypto maps and ACL’s on the UC. So if you are doing this remotely through a VPN there is always a chance that you will lose your connection. If you need additional information on the Multisite manger please let me know.
Thank you,
Jason Nickle

Official Support for Multisite Behind SA520 Firewalls?

I'm at the beginning of a new multisite implementation with two sites. There are existing SA520 firewalls at each site. I have a UC540 and a UC560 with latest software packs and CCA 3.2(2).
I'd like to know if multisite is currently (April, 2013) officially supported by Cisco when the UC devices are behind SA520 firewalls and whether this is configurable using CCA 3.2(2).
I've done multisite in the past in an unsupported configuration via CLI and I'm hoping to go "by the book" as much as possible on this one. I can drop the SA520 firewalls if needed. I have a lot of support procedures built around the SA520 so I have some incentive to keep them in place but not at the expense of running an unsupported configuration.
Any help would be much appreciated.

Hello Jeffrey,
The way this will be configured depends upon the topology you go with. If you leave the SA520's in place, the VPN connection would be between the SA520's, and the UC500's would not be involved, and this would not be configured using CCA. This is supported, but just not thought the UC500's or CCA.
If you make the UC500's the edge devices, or put them in a DMZ with public IP addresses, then the multisite configuration in CCA can be used, and also is supported.
So, I guess it just depends on which way you want to go. But both topologies are supported by Cisco, but CCA will only be used (For the VPN configuration) if the UC500's are configured with Public IP addresses.
Thank you,
Darren

Error While including the Multisite functionality

Error While including the Multisite functionality & trying to click on SiteAdministraion tab in BCC
Background: We have migrated our application from ATG v9.1 to ATG v 10.0.2 and implementing Multisite on the same
Getting this error on BCC console:
12:55:36,893 INFO [ServerImpl] JBoss (Microcontainer) [5.0.0.GA (build: SVNTag=JBPAPP_5_0_0_GA date=200910202128)] Started in 2m:44s:727ms
12:57:24,234 ERROR [SiteAdminActivitySource] The acl for the custom workflow activity named siteadmin.manageSiteAssets is invalid. This activity will not be available.
atg.security.InvalidPersonaException: Profile$role$siteAdminUser
at atg.security.AccessControlListParser.setPersona(AccessControlListParser.java:239)
at atg.security.AccessControlListParser.parseAce(AccessControlListParser.java:277)
at atg.security.AccessControlListParser.parse(AccessControlListParser.java:193)
Thanks in Anticipation1

Hello Sudheer,
Increasing the Swap space is the only thing i noticed in all SAP Notes for your problem.
Configure more swapspace please and restart the installation.
Regards,
Siddhesh

CS5.5 and WordPress Multisite

So, I upgraded from my CS4 to CS5.5 last week. I've extremely excited about the Live View / Inspector aspect of editing my php and WordPress projects. I'm running this on a suped up win 7 box. I deleted/uninstalled my old xampp setup and downloaded a new one. I'm going to have a Solr search engine for a WordPress Multisite blog/directory when I'm all done. So, I spent the time to also set up tomcat and get an instance of Solr running on my local machine. (not that this is important, but shows I'm not a complete beginner).
I've followed the tutorials on setting up WordPress to be able to do the testing server, live view and editing. Everything works fine on a new single blog install (I started a brand new one just to check and to do the Lynda.com tutorials, which are working just fine.) But, when I go to the Multisite Sub-Blog and set up the discovery of the related links DW gives me a whopping 4 files that are linked. I can follow the links on the live view pages, but the dynamic linking files are not showing up in the top toolbar? I can't jump over to the header.php file and then back to the index.php file, because they are not finding all of the linking php files.
As, I mentioned, it's a multisite only problem, becuase it's working on a single blog install just fine. I thought maybe it was because of the addressing, the testing folder was different from the root website. So, I edited the vhosts.conf file and hosts file to add a specific testing domain name and there was no change except that I don't get the error anymore when I set up the testing server that the site url of "/" doesn't match the one I had that was "/mydirectory/".
This was an older site that was set up in Dreamweaver that I just kept changing all of the local testing environment stuff, but the link to the remote server was still active. So, I thought that might be causing the trouble because it was going out to that server to try to follow some of the dynamically linked pages. So, I completely deleted everything and started over with a fresh Site with just the Testing server set up, fresh wordpress, fresh evreything. I am able to discover the related links in the file right up to when I turn on multisite in a sub-directory install and the whole discovery of related links wigs out.
If you look at the http://codex.wordpress.org/Create_A_Network I checked the dynamic links at each step. It worked turning on Multisite and going to network setup, but as soon as I entered the code in the wp-config.php file for defining a multisite and added the .htaccess file then the whole thing breaks.
I'm sure it has to do with how the path is loaded somehow dynamically, but as many people that there are running this combo, of Dreamweaver 5.5 and trying to work on Wordpress, and maybe a Multisite install since it's so much easier in 3.0+ I was surprised that there was nothing on the web about this issue.
Thanks for any help upfront.
Jerry

The WordPress Multisite does use mod rewrite in .htaccess. The contents of that are found in the link I provided on setting up a WordPress Multisite install found at WordPress.org. As each of the sub-blogs require the use of elements and data from the main site and structure to draw the pages I do not think that setting up each sub-blog as it’s own site definition would work. It would still have issues finding the relating files. I guess, if someone figured out how to use Dreamweaver on a blog hosted at wordpress.com to edit themes and such that would probably flow to solving this issue as well.
Since this is on a Development XAMPP server on my own machine, if I put the .htaccess code in my httpd.conf file instead would that make a difference? Or is it the mod rewrite that is the issue no matter where it resides?
I basically decided to set up each sub-blog as a completely separate “site” for now since all I’m sync’ing is the theme folders anyways at that point and all I was truly after was the Live View / Inspector for making the layout changes. When I did that though and activated all the plugins that I’m using I noticed some issues with file discovery as well. I saw in one of the tutorials that there was a way to link a style.css file manually for “design” prior to uploading the site. Is there anything inside of Dreamweaver that would allow us to manually add the necessary php file for the finder. I’m pretty sure that it’s getting stuck at the line that is saying (dirname(__FILE__) . “wp-load.php” or something like that (off the top of my head). Once that relative file would be found my guess is that it would discover all the other ones? Or there is an issue with the ABSPATH variable being set early on in the WordPress installation.
At this point I’ve tried a dozen different ways to get this to work and it’s obviously broken. Since it’s so prevalent (I think a lot of the posts I read had this also as a multisite drupal/joomla issue as well) that it would be something worth figuring out how to provide a work around.
Jerry

Ask the Expert: Single-Site and Multisite FlexPod Infrastructure

With Haseeb Niazi and Chris O'Brien
Welcome to the Cisco Support Community Ask the Expert conversation. This is an opportunity to learn and ask questions about Single-Site and Multisite FlexPod Infrastructure with experts Haseeb Niazi and Chris O'Brien.
This is a continuation of the live webcast.
FlexPod is a predesigned and prevalidated base data center configuration built on Cisco Unified Computing System, Cisco Nexus data center switches, NetApp FAS storage components, and a number of software infrastructure options supporting a range of IT initiatives. FlexPod is the result of deep technology collaboration between Cisco and NetApp, leading to the creation of an integrated, tested, and validated data center platform that has been thoroughly documented in a best practices design guide. In many cases, the availability of Cisco Validated Design guides has reduced the time to deployment of mission-critical applications by 30 percent.
The FlexPod portfolio includes a number of validated design options that can be deployed in a single site to support both physical and virtual workloads or across metro sites for supporting high availability and disaster avoidance. This session covers various design options available to customers and partners, including the latest MetroCluster FlexPod design to support a VMware Metro Storage Cluster (vMSC) configuration.
Haseeb Niazi is a technical marketing engineer in the Data Center Group specializing in security and data center technologies. His areas of expertise also include VPN and security, the Cisco Nexus product line, and FlexPod. Prior to joining the Data Center Group, he worked as a technical leader in the Solution Development Unit and as a solutions architect in Advanced Services. Haseeb holds a master of science degree in computer engineering from the University of Southern California. He’s CCIE certified (number 7848) and has 14 years of industry experience.
Chris O'Brien is a technical marketing manager with Cisco’s Computing Systems Product Group. He is currently focused on developing infrastructure best practices and solutions that are designed, tested, and documented to facilitate and improve customer deployments. Previously, O'Brien was an application developer and has worked in the IT industry for more than 20 years.
Remember to use the rating system to let Haseeb and Chris know if you have received an adequate response.
Because of the volume expected during this event, Haseeb and Chris might not be able to answer every question. Remember that you can continue the conversation in the Data Center community, subcommunity Unified Computing shortly after the event. This event lasts through September 27, 2013. Visit this forum often to view responses to your questions and the questions of other Cisco Support Community members.
Webcast related links:
Single-Site and Multisite FlexPod Infrastructure - Slides from live webcast
Single-Site and Multisite FlexPod Infrastructure: FAQ from live webcast
Single-Site and Multisite FlexPod Infrastructure - Video from live webcast

I would suggest you read this white paper which details the pros and cons of direct connect storage.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/prod/collateral/ps10265/ps10276/whitepaper_c11-702584.html   This paper captures all the major design points for Ethernet and FC protocols.
I would only add that in FlexPod we are trying to create a highly available solution and "flexible" solution; Nexus switching helps us deliver on both with vPC and unified ports.
NPV equats to end-host mode which allows the system to present all of the servers as N ports to the external fabric. In this mode, the vHBAs are pinned to the egress interfaces of the fabric interconnects. This pinning removes the potential of loops in the SAN fabric. Host based multipathing of the vHBAs account for potential uplink failures. The NPV mode (end-host mode) simplifies the attachment of UCS into the SAN fabric and that is why it is in NPV mode by default.
So for your last question, I will have to put my Product Manager hat on so bear with me.   First off there is no drawback to enabling the NPIV feature (none that I am aware of) the Nexus 5000 platform simply offers you a choice to design and support multiple FC initiators (N-Ports) per F-Port via NPIV. This allows for the integration of the FI end-host mode described above. I imagine being a unfied access layer switch, the Nexus team enabled standard Fibre Channel switching capability and features first. The implementatin of NPIV is a customer choice based on their specific access layer requirements.
/Chris

Lost my multisite files in iweb. Where can they be?

Skipper

You mean Multisite for iWeb?
http://www.clarkwood.com/multisite/
Here are some text you may have see when you started using the application :
The domain files are deleted from the default folder and stored in a MultiSite file in the Documents folder.
When you stop MultiSite the domain files are moved back to the default folder.
When you use iWebSites, you can rename them for further use.
http://www.wyodor.net/_Demo/Aptana/iWebSites.html
iWebSites is actually a better application than Multisite to manage several domain files.
If all of the above isn't what you mean, then explain yourself in more detail.

Problem adding Remote multisite Entry Point

Hi, we have DirectAccess 2012 setup for multisite with a default site with 2 DA servers with load balancing in Sweden, one DA server in Phoenix (US) and one in Romania. For the US one i had to change the entrypointDC after i had added it since otherwise
i could not use the RemoteAccess management console.. everything just hung when it could not load the configuration.. i guessing it timed out.. getting the config from the US AD server and that broke everything (hmmm...)
I am now trying to add another entry point in the US (not the same site) but cant get past "adding an entry point... Please wait while the configuration is applied.." i have waited a couple of days.. it dos not get past that.
I wanted to try the powershell command for adding a entry point to but i cant find any info on how to specify the different GPO:s correctly.. i have Windows 7 computer to so i need a server GPO , a client GPO and a windows 7 group.. and i have not
been able to figure out how to do that..
Or if its possible to change a entrypointDC while adding the entrypoint.. so it wont time out.
Anyone have any smart tips ?
BR
Daniel

Hi Daniel,
Please try to follow the guide below,
Deploy Multiple Remote Access Servers in a Multisite Deployment
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh831664.aspx
Besides, is there any warning or error in the event viewer?
Best Regards.
Steven Lee
TechNet Community Support

Diffrence between Codec C40 Premium Resolution Option & Multisite MS Option & Dual Display Option

What is the difference between
Codec C40 Premium Resolution Option
LIC-C40-PR
Codec C40 Multisite MS Option
LIC-C40-MS
Codec C40 Dual Display Option
LIC-C40-DD

Hi patilaniket
Codec C40 Premium Resolution Option is option key which affects the resolution you can transmit during a video conference.
It should be required for:
1920 × 1080@60 fps (1080p60)
1920 × 1080@30 fps (1080p30)
1440 × 900@30 fps (WXGA+)
1472 × 1080@30 fps (SXGA+)
1680 × 1050@30 fps (WSXGA+)
1600 × 1200@30 fps (UXGA)
512 × 288@60 fps (w288p60)
768 × 448@60 fps (w448p60)
1024 × 576@60 fps (w576p60)
1280 × 720@60 fps (720p60)
Codec C40 Multisite MS Option is the option key on an endpoint that enables that endpoint to support a multipoint call w/o MCU. For example with this option you can create conference call with max. 4 members w/o MCU. For more participants you need MCU.
Codec C40 Dual Display Option is the option key that enables you to show 2 different contents. For example:
Video ouptuts on the C40 are enabled by default. W/o the Dual Display option, you'll get the same content on both screens. With this option you can have video call on one screen and shared content on the second screen.
Michal.

Directaccess Multisite problem

Hi, i am having a problem with our multisite deployment:
i have a main office with two directaccess 2012 servers in loadbalance configuration, i also have serveral smaller offices and have added directaccess 2012 servers to two of them, i could install multisite without problem, and the directaccess servers are
working for clients, but one of them is connected via a VPN between two firewalls, and i am having allot of difficulty managing that one. there are no problem pinging or accessing the server both the directaccess server and a active directory server.
But directaccess can not seem to reach it, ex:
Get-DAEntryPoint : Domain controller usdc05.domain.se cannot be reached for USSITE01.
At line:1 char:1
+ Get-DAEntryPoint -Name "USSITE01"
+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    + CategoryInfo          : NotSpecified: (domain.se\{4A3891...F-B5AA19B36098}:root/Microsoft/...PS_DAEntryPoint) [Get
   -DAEntryPoint], CimException
    + FullyQualifiedErrorId : REMOTEACCESS 127,Get-DAEntryPoint
And since the directaccess is having problems reaching the servers trough the VPN connection i can not manage the Directaccess configuration since everything stops working when one part is unreachable...a really annoying feature of directaccess 2012.
Have anybody tried having directaccess multisite where the sites are seperated by vpn and got it to work ?
Best Regards
Daniel

Hi Daniel,
To such issue, it is not an efficient way to work in this community since we may need more resources, for example memory (application) dump or ETL trace, which is not appropriate to handle in community. I’d like to suggest that you submit a service request
to MS Professional tech support service so that a dedicated Support Professional can further assist with this request.
Please visit the below link to see the various paid support options that are available to better meet your needs. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?id=fh;en-us;offerprophone
Thank you.
Best regards,
Steven Song
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

IWeb (08) and Multisites - My Site is Gone

Downloaded and opened Multisites and launched iWeb(08) and my "site" on iweb (08) was gone. The site is still up and running on .mac and the web.
Found domainfile in Documents but when I click and open it fron my desktop I still just get a "new site" in iweb (08). I tried that a few times. Have I completely lost the original by opening and reopening mulitsites and iweb.
I have all my files, archives etc still on my drive just no domain file.
I had also emptied my trash and in this maybe my problem.
Thanks in advance for any help that you are able to supply.
Frustrated and not looking forward to maybe rebuilding my site..
Debbie

You do not need any of those apps to manage your domain.sites2.
1) You can double-click on it to start iweb.
2) Domain.sites2 does not have to be named as such, they can be named anything as long as you keep .sites2 extension:
http://11mystics.com/blog/2007/09/08/how-do-you-manage-multiple-domain-files-for -iweb/
3) You can start a new Domain.sites2 with a simpe AppleScript, see my posts here:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=6007612
on #3, if it is too much to understand; you can email me at hac<dot>le@sbcglobal<dot>net , I'll send you the AppleScript.
Making a new domain.sites2 is quite important, and a few of you here know that you can not merge your domain.sites2.
And the reason is iWeb2 is loaded with UUIDs and when you duplicate an existing domain.sites2, you will have problems.
Who here wants to know about UUID and iweb?

Configuration in multisite environment

HI Guys,
What are the configurations we need to do for creating different orders for different sites in atg multisite environment(same ear file and same server instance).
I have two multisite applications
1.In one application we are having only one order for both sites and what ever items we added to cart in both sites are adding to same order
2.In another application for each site we are getting different orders.Those orders are site specific
what are the configurations we need to do for this
Please give me clarification on this.

In multisite application Site group is used to categories sites.
Sites falling in same group(same category) can share resources(sharable resources) specified in site group.
OOTB cart(order)and profile are declared as sharable ype, if you add these in site group 's sharable data, They will be shared across the site group.
For More info refer Multisite administration guide Oracle ATG Web Commerce - Sharing Data
Thanks,
Nitin.

How does OOB breadcrumbs work for multisite environment

Hi
I am currently using CatalogNavHistory and CatalogNavHistoryCollector to display breadcrumbs in my catalog pages.
My doubt is with ATG10.1 we are using multisite environment for our project. So one category will be part of more than one site.
So how does OOB CatalogNavHistory and CatalogNavHistoryCollector handle the breadcrumbs for these scenario?
Thanks
Ajay

Dear KK,
IF You want to use the EURO currency as transaction currency and Your Local currency is Australian Dollar, the System correectly will take the Exchange rate EURX.
EURO is used for the old european currencies
EURX for all the other foreign currencies
EMU indicator that means European Monetary Union has to be flagged if the referency currency is EUR.
I hope this can help You.
Mauri

Edge 95 MXP always use multisite option instead multiway

Hello, we have a edge 95 mxp were we have configure multiway but when we want to make a conference call always use multisite option instead of multiway. Our deployment scenario is based on the following scenario: Deployment with TelePresence Conductor connected to Unified CM (page38) from the following deployment guide:http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/telepresence/infrastructure/vcs/config_guide/X8-2/Cisco-TelePresence-Multiway-Deployment-Guide-X8-2-XC2-4.pdf.
The Egde 95 MXP is register on VCS-C, DX650 and CTS500 are register in CUCM.
Our versions are
VCS-C 8.2.1
CUCM 10.5.1.11901-1
Conductor XC3.0.2
vTS: 4.1(1.79)
Edge95 MXP:F9.0 PAL
And below is the config of the Edge95
xconfiguration m
*c xConfiguration MainVideoSource: 1
*c xConfiguration Multipoint Mode: Multiway
*c xConfiguration Multipoint MultiwayURI: "(205)([3-4])(.)@domain(.*)"
*c xConfiguration Multipoint MultiwayMultiprotocol: On
*c xConfiguration Multipoint MultiwayStartupPeriod: 4
*c xConfiguration MaxBandwidth: 6144
Any help we will be useful
Regardd
Anestis

Hi,
Hi Wayne, I change the Multiway URI to be as it is the actual alias in my conference alias template on Conductor
xconfiguration m
*c xConfiguration MainVideoSource: 1
*c xConfiguration Multipoint Mode: Multiway
*c xConfiguration Multipoint MultiwayURI: " [sip:|h323:][email protected]"
*c xConfiguration Multipoint MultiwayMultiprotocol: On
*c xConfiguration Multipoint MultiwayStartupPeriod: 4
*c xConfiguration MaxBandwidth: 6144
But from the Edge 95 I'm in a point-to-point call and I see the following
xstatus call
*s Call 1 (status=Synced, type=Vtlph, protocol=H323, direction=Outgoing, logTag=21):
CallRate: 768
RemoteNumber: "20498"
Mute: Off
Microphone: On
Duration: 318
MuteOutgoing: Off
CallOnHold: False
RemoteSiteOnHold: False
MultiwayProgress: Off
Channels 1 (type=Incoming):
Rate: 768
Restrict: Off
IPLR: On
Encryption (status=Off): /
Audio (status=Active):
Protocol: G722
Rate: 64
Video 1 (status=Active):
Protocol: H264
Resolution: Custom
Rate: 704
Video 2 (status=Inactive): /
Data (status=Inactive): /
Channels 2 (type=Outgoing):
Rate: 768
Restrict: Off
IPLR: Off
Encryption (status=Off): /
Audio (status=Active):
Protocol: G722
Rate: 64
Video 1 (status=Active):
Protocol: H264
Resolution: w448p
Rate: 704
Video 2 (status=Inactive): /
Data (status=Inactive): /
*s/end
*s Call 2 (status=Disconnected, type=NA, protocol=NA, direction=NA, logTag=NA):
Cause: 16
*s/end
*s Call 3 (status=Disconnected, type=NA, protocol=NA, direction=NA, logTag=NA):
Cause: 16
*s/end
*s Call 4 (status=Disconnected, type=NA, protocol=NA, direction=NA, logTag=NA):
Cause: 16
*s/end
*s Call 5 (status=Disconnected, type=NA, protocol=NA, direction=NA, logTag=NA):
Cause: 16
*s/end
*s Call 6 (status=Disconnected, type=NA, protocol=NA, direction=NA, logTag=NA):
Cause: 255
*s/end
*s Call 7 (status=Disconnected, type=NA, protocol=NA, direction=NA, logTag=NA):
Cause: 255
*s/end
OK
Do I have to make any more config on Edge95 because it seems to me that can not go to the multiway for a conference.
Regards
Anestis

Multisite UC500

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for