Muse buttons appear garbled when published to BC. Files look fine when exported to html.

See attached.  BC publishing can not be trusted. This has happened several times.

Why does this forum miniaturize attached images so you can't see the detail? See attached enlargement. This only appears when published to BC. Ok when exported to html. Can't trust BC

Similar Messages

  • Hey, why do Muse buttons appear garbled when published to Business Catalyst?

    Buttons look fine when exported to html and uploaded to normal web server. So what's going on with BC. Also sometimes BC delays new files, or fails to render new files. See attached screen print.

    It appears the size of the image generated by Muse for the top, middle and bottom slices of the rounded corner bevel image is slightly too wide for the button and thus it wraps around by a couple pixels.
    Aishvarya, can you check in the BC backend to see what width these three PNG images are on the BC servers?
    http://httpwwwtalentsearchbgwcom.businesscatalyst.com/images/u14135-m-sprite.png
    http://httpwwwtalentsearchbgwcom.businesscatalyst.com/images/u14209-r-sprite.png
    http://httpwwwtalentsearchbgwcom.businesscatalyst.com/images/u14209-sprite.png
    The images being served are all 1521 pixels wide, but they should be 1515 pixels wide. It's unclear whether BC is serving an older cached version of the images or whether Muse generated and uploaded images of the wrong width. Thanks.
    paulrussell1 you'll receive more timely assistance from the forum community if you continue to reply with information regarding a single issue in a single forum thread. Starting a new thread basically restarts the process of getting to a solution. If a thread is going unanswered, replying to your own thread will bring it back to the top of the recently active threads and increase the likelihood of receiving assistance from the community.
    If immediate 1-on-1 support from Adobe is required, Live Chat and Phone Support are available at <Contact Customer Care>.

  • Photoshop diplays all images with desaturated colors (Images look fine when opened in other apps)

    All of a sudden, when I open any image in Photoshop, the colors appear to be desaturated...In Photoshop only. When I open that same image in Window Picture Viewer, or Quicktimer, or even if I drag the image into a brower window, the colors appear fine. But in Photoshop, something is clearly wrong. Now, I can make color adjustments to the image, but when I save and reopen reopen it in another application, I can see that color changes have been made, but they still don't match what Photoshop is displaying.
    The images are RGB image...I've checked the color space setings in Photoshop, and they are the default (Edit > Color Settings: North American General Purpose 2 / RGB: sRGB IEC61966-2.1 / CMYK: US Web Coated (SWOP) V2, etc, etc). I also made sure View > Proof Setup was set to: Working CMYK. I even reset Photoshop to it's default settings (by holding down CTRL-ALT-SHIFT on launching Photoshop)...But the images still appear desaturated when I open them in Photoshop...So, I don't understand how this is still a Photoshop problem...But then again, they look fine when I use any other application on my computer to open them, so it's clearly not an issue with my monitor.
    The frustrating thing is, I haven't made any changes to Photoshop OR my monitor (that I know about)...Photoshop has worked perfectly for me for years, and now there's this SNAFU that I just can not figure out.
    Any suggestions?
    I've included a screenshot below to show the disparity between an image opened in Photoshop (on left) and Windows Picture Viewer (on right):
    Photoshop image on left, with desaturated colors...Same image in Windows Picture Viewer on right, where colors appear normal.
    Any and all help is much appreciated : )
    Best,
    -Austin

    It's difficult to provide help without knowing your level of color-management expertise, but I think you've helped us some with that in post number 2.
    Color management is basically this:  Images and devices have certain color characteristics, and these are described by color profiles, sometimes also called color spaces.
    1.  You should not need to use the Proof Setup at all to view your images on your monitor.  When things are set up properly Photoshop shows you accurate color without your choosing View - Proof Colors.
    2.  A color-managed application like Photoshop will try to show you accurate color on your display by interpreting both the image profile and your monitor profile and transforming the colors accordingly.  BY DEFINITION this will look different than other applications which don't do color-management as these just pump the image RGB values directly out to the display. 
    Thus:
    If your monitor profile indicates your monitor has a wide gamut, images with embedded profiles may appear less saturated inside Photoshop than from non-color-managed apps.
    If you view images that have an embedded wide gamut profile (such as Adobe RGB 1998 or ProPhoto RGB), Photoshop and other color-managed applications will interpret that profile and the colors will likely appear more saturated in Photoshop than in a non-color-managed application.
    It sounds as though the first case applies in your case here.
    You can check to see what monitor profile is associated with your monitor through OS settings.  I'm thinking, based on the caption buttons in your screen grab, that you've got Windows XP, but rather than go further with that assumption, I'll ask you to verify it first.
    -Noel

  • .Mac not updating when publish modified iWed file

    Hi, when I first published my iWeb file to .Mac, it worked. Then I edited the iWeb file and republished, waited a few days, and my .Mac site is still showing the old original iWeb file.
    - I tried republishing several times (publish to .Mac and publish all to .Mac)
    - I also refreshed the page a bunch of times in my browser
    - I also emptied the browser cache
    Any ideas?
    thanks!
    Rob

    the actual website is www.uechi-ryu-vancouver.com
    This url is being forwarded to
    http://web.mac.com/robert.kolenc/iWeb/Site/Welcome.html
    which is a site created by iWeb 1. You should change the forwarding to
    http://web.mac.com/robert.kolenc
    so it will go to your site created by iWeb 2.

  • Mail won't send mail when in wireless mode but works fine when wired

    Ok, this happens all the time. I have several pop email accounts, all of which work fine when I am hooked in to an ethernet cable, but Apple Mail won't send any of my outgoing mail form any of my accounts when i'm am working wirelessly.
    I always get a message like:
    Cannot send message using server smtp.name.net
    I try to switch servers and I cycle through all of them, getting them same message, followed by things like:
    The server response was: 5.1.2 Bad or missing RCPT domain k39sm5757680wah
    Any advice.

    Go to Apple Menu > System Preferences > Network, choose Network Port Configurations from the Show popup menu, and make sure that the configuration used to connect to Internet appears at the top of the list. Leave checked (enabled) only the port configuration needed to connect to Internet and Built-in Ethernet (in that order if not the same), uncheck (disable) the rest of network port configurations and see whether that helps — if it doesn’t, turn ON again the ones you want enabled.
    You may use “network locations” to more easily switch between network settings if necessary, as described here:
    Using network locations in Mac OS X

  • Why do my DV files look better when played in MPEG Streamclip than iMovie?

    My home movie DV files look washed out (compared to what my tapes looked like I played them on the TV years ago) when played with both iMovie '06 and iMove '11. The claim has been made that if I retransfer my tapes using iMovie '06 (rather than '09, which I used last time, or '11), there will be a dramatic improvement in the visual quality (and there will be some unspecified benefits if I set the dial to 48K audio). HOWEVER, if I play the files I already have in MPEG Streamclip, the visual quality improves substantially without any retransfer. Here is my question: Why? Why do my iMovie-imported files look better in MPEG Streamclip than in iMovie?
    Here is my layman's answer: algorithms. When MPEG Streamclip encounters the exact same arrangements of molecules (or whatever), it has some plan for what to do with them that is smarter than what iMovie does. Is this another sign or way that iMovie is not well suited for DV?

    Please go to my website where I have posted new instructions on working with DV.
    This keeps both interlaced fields from FireWire capture through to a DVD. All the lines means no lost quality when editing DV or Digital8.
    It also solves the washed-out color problem.

  • Get error when checking out jsp file from cvs when Jdev is running in linux

    I have JDev 9.0.3 andd CVS running in linux with same build version.
    When I check out a project one jsp does not show up in the IDE but shows in the file folder correcly when I edit it thru vi.
    I get this error when I try to edit in Jdev.
    java.lang.NullPointerException
         at oracle.jdevimpl.webapp.html.HtmlSourceNode.reopen(HtmlSourceNode.java:159)
         at oracle.ide.model.TextNode.open(TextNode.java:150)
         at oracle.ide.model.TextNode.acquireTextBuffer(TextNode.java:375)
         at oracle.jdevimpl.webapp.html.HtmlSourceNode.getInputStream(HtmlSourceNode.java:239)
         at oracle.jdevimpl.webapp.editor.jsp.JspPreviewer.updateDocument(JspPreviewer.java:344)
         at oracle.jdevimpl.webapp.editor.jsp.JspPreviewer.open(JspPreviewer.java:161)
         at oracle.ideimpl.editor.EditorManagerImpl.openEditorInFrame(EditorManagerImpl.java:648)
         at oracle.ide.editor.EditorUtil.openExplicitEditorInFrame(EditorUtil.java:33)
         at oracle.ide.cmd.OpenEditorCommand.doit(OpenEditorCommand.java:45)
         at oracle.ide.CommandProcessor.invoke(CommandProcessor.java:363)
         at oracle.ide.CommandProcessor.invoke(CommandProcessor.java:115)
         at oracle.ideimpl.editor.EditorManagerImpl.handleEvent(EditorManagerImpl.java:1902)
         at oracle.ide.IdeAction$1.run(IdeAction.java:579)
         at java.awt.event.InvocationEvent.dispatch(InvocationEvent.java:149)
         at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(EventQueue.java:332)
         at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:126)
         at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:93)
         at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:88)
         at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:80)

    Hi,
    When you are starting service in OS, you are actually starting the maxdb instance service .
    You can set it in auto mode so that you will not get this error.  The OS service only establishes the connection to SAP.
    As a part of CS install, from CSADMIN part it is just required to send the certificate successfully to OAC0.
    Normally no activity is required to be done to under SICF from CS install point of view.
    Anirudh,

  • Site won't display correctly when 'Published' to Business Catalyst but does when 'Preview' in browse

    Basically I have a subscription to Muse and with that the ability to host one site with Business Catalyst. When checking the first site I designed I'd use 'Preview in Browser' and the site occasionaly displayed incorrectly, so I changed my habits to publishing the work-in-progress site to the BC url with this current site.
    Unfortunately there are multiple display problems with doing this; the two images below show the difference between 'Publish' to the BC domain and 'Preview site in browser'.
    I've cleared the cache of the browser multiple times and used both Firefox and Safari and the problem still remains. I'm assuming it's a problem with Business Catalyst?
    Does anyone have a solution for this? Has data become corrupted in BC, and if so is there a way of 'flushing' the data held on the BC site clean to start from scratch?
    Would really appreciate some help here as it's impossible to show my client the current state of the site
    Thanks in advance
    Phil
    http://httpwiles06businesscatalystcom.businesscatalyst.com/clients.html

    Hi Phil
    I checked the site and i can see all the images in page.
    Can you try to check with a different browser or if possible on a different system or device ?
    Thanks,
    Sanjit

  • MS Excel 2010 , A Button appears next the Sheets in the Files

    Hi All,
              I see a button that appear ( as highlighted) next to the Sheets listed in an excel files. Want to know how to enable it in a new excel file
    Regards,
    Karthik Doss

    Hi,
    Is there any response when you click this button? I’m using Excel 2010, unable to find this button.
    Could you please share more detail information with us?
    Regards,
    Greta Ge CHN
    TechNet Community Support

  • All .swf audio plays on slide 1 when published as swf file!

    Help!
    I am trying to publish a series of projects (seven) as swf files to upload to moodle for a CBT course.  This is my first time ever using Captivate in this way and when I go to view the outputs using a web browser, all of the audio for the imbedded flash files in the project plays on top of each other on the first slide.  They will also play as they are supposed to during the course, but it's very annoying.
    When I publish the project as a standalone file, everything works flawlessly.  What is causing this and how can I fix it?  I must also state that I outsourced the flash work and know next to nothing about flash, so any help you give that might involve that piece, I will have to pass on to the flash developer.
    Thank you in advance for any suggestions.
    EDIT: Captivate 3.0.1  Not sure what version of Flash.

    Was there ever a typing text object anywhere in your project that you delete at one time? I remember from Cp3 that when it would capture a typing text animation from a capture session, that you could never truly delete the object from the slide, only hide it (not sure if it's the same in Cp4, I recently jumped to Cp5).
    When in doubt, I would do Insert > Blank Slide, then re-create the audio/objects from your current slide 1 and insert/paste onto the blank slide, then blow away the problematic slide 1, then republish and see if that helps!

  • Published Captivate 5 files look distorted in MS Word 2007

    I am trying to create handouts for my Captivate 5 project.  I would like the following format:
    - 4 slides per page
    - Display Slide Notes
    - Display objects and questions
    When I publish the handouts to MS Word 2007, the slide images appears squashed (distorted).  See example below.
    The images should have a 4 by 3 aspect ratio.   Note: when I publish the handouts in the "no table" mode (1 slide per page), the slide images look correct (but this wastes lots of paper).
    Also, this problem did not occur on the same computer running Captivate 4.
    I understand that it might be possible to modify the "Word Publish Template" to customize the MS Word layout.  I'm willing to do this, but would like to get a copy of the "default template" to use as a starting point.
    How do I fix this problem or get a sample Word Publish Template?
    Any help would be appreciated.

    For the replace and delete pages, I can only guess that you are messing up some of the bookmarks or links in the page from what I think you have based on the description. I would work on copies between each stage so that you can at least go back to the last success stage. If possible, you are better to go back and do the modifications in the original page and the recreate the PDF. If that is not possible, then maybe a better explanation of how you are creating the PDF would help folks understand your process fully and suggest a solution.
    On the latter, I would do a repair on Acrobat. However, it may be in the process you are using in the conversion from WORD. How are you creating the PDF from WORD? Have you updated AA9 and not simply have 9.0? The confusing point is that you talk about Distiller for getting the PDF from WORD. Distiller is often involved, but only behind the scenes and normally you either print to the Adobe PDF printer, use PDF Maker, or use the MS plugin for PDF creation. So when stating Distiller, it is unclear what process you are using since none of the methods I mention state the use of Distiller even if it is used in the background.

  • After publishing (using iWeb) content looks fine, but pagenames don't show!

    Pagenames/buttons like Home, Contact and all are not visible when opening site from server (see www.unitedsigns.nl). On my mac everything is fine. I published it to a usb-stick, and fine too. But on a windows laptop it is not.
    I've done it many times before (see www.unitedtextile.nl) (and see buttons on top) and never had such problems. Did not get help from provider.
    Somebody help me out, please!

    The reason that the navbar for your www.unitedsigns.nl site isn't being display is because not all of the necessary file are getting uploaded to the server. Open the Activity window (CommandOptionA) for that site (in Safari) you'll see that a number of files in the Scripts folder are missing.
    How are you uploading the files to the server? If it's with iWeb's built in FTP client try the following:
    1- publish you site to a folder on your HD.
    Click to view full size
    2 - download and use Cyberduck to upload the site folder to the server.
    To fix just his problem at this time you can use Cyberduck to upload just the Scripts folder for the site. If you have problems with uploading from iWeb at a later date then you can use CD routinely to upload the site's files as described in the tutorial.
    More on this can be found in this tutorial: #2 - Uploading only those published new or newly edited files when using a 3rd party FTP client.
    Many users have found switching to Cyberduck fixed their uploading problem. Worth a try.
    Message was edited by: Old Toad

  • Illustrator vector files look blurred when zoomed on in in AE

    I just have text from a illustrator file, imported in to after after effects. When I scale the text, the quality isn't affect, but when i zoom in, the text is blurred, I have the continuously rasterize box clicked, and it's still blurred.
    How can I fix this problem? Thanks

    >  I mean when I scale the text up it doesn't get affected, just when I zoom.
    That's not actually a problem. That's normal. When you scale a layer with continuous rasterization, the vector information is converted into a new set of pixels to make things sharp. When you just zoom in a preview, you're not actually changing any pixels in the composition; you're just zooming in on the existing pixels for a closer look.
    from After Effects Help:
    "Note: After Effects renders vector objects before zooming (scaling for preview), so some vector objects may appear jagged when you zoom in on them. This apparent pixelation for zooms does not affect scaling of layers or rendering to final output. "

  • Why do Adobe Illustrator files look blurry when Replicated?

    When I replicate a group of Adobe Illustrator files, the Replicator output is blurry.
    Take a look at this screencast for more details.
    I've turned off Fixed Resolution for each layer. The group of AI layers scales fine and stays crisp at any scale. However, when I replicate the group, the output is blurry.
    Any ideas?
    Thanks!

    I'm moving down the question list
    In the Replicator inspector, turn on 3D. Turn on Best from the Render > Quality menu.
    Also, if you're exporting to a movie file and you're working in Normal or Draft quality settings, in the Export dialog, make sure to click the Render option button and set Render Quality to Best as well.  Sometimes it's easier to work in Normal, especially if you're using emitters and render out at Best. With the export dialog, you can make "final decisions" to the render separately from your workflow. (Export is set to "Use canvas setting" by default.)

  • Illustrator files look jaggy when scaled up (when used as a particle)

    Am i doing something odd? I've got an illustrator vector which i'm using as a particle which scales over life (i want the particles to fill frame for a wipe i'm creating). But when they are bigger that 100% they look really jaggy, even when render quality is set to BEST.
    Any ideas?

    Howdy,
    Particle emitters and replicators render the source image at its current scale and use that bitmap as the starting point for each cell. This means that you might see scaling artifacts if a particle cell is smaller or larger than the source image.
    The one exception to this is when the emitter or replicator is in "Global 3D" mode. Each cell is then rendered based on the full size of the source, so with vector sources like shapes or PDFs the results will be higher quality. Keep in mind, however, that this means re-rasterizing that source image for each cell. So with an emitter of 1000 particles, for example, it's almost like you have a project with 1000 PDF images in it.
    In other words: use this power for good, not evil.

Maybe you are looking for