MuVo: Two-Tier Director

Hi, i'm sure this is something that's been asked a million times before, but I'm a little confused about the Firmware upgrade i just did.
It mentioned that the Firmware update;
"Improves track organization and playback with two-tier directory structure."
How does this work... I'd be grateful if someone would enlighten a novice , many thanks

I was trying to help, and you misread my answer. Using folders to store albums in *is* simply a really great way to organise them, I was trying to be helpful!
As I already said most MuVos do work with folders, and it is documented in the manual for *these* players. I assumed this was the case with the original MuVo (we also have the MuVo NX, MuVo TX, MuVo TX FM, MuVo USB 2.0, MuVo Slim, MuVo Micro N200, MuVo Sport C00, MuVo V200, MuVo? and MuVo? FM, so perhaps you can see it isn't quite that clear cut). I'm sorry that I couldn't fully answer your other questions, but that's no cause to be nasty to someone as any sensible person I'm sure would agree with.
I don't own many of the products that Creative sell, but I have helped and solved a lot of questions. Take a minute or two to actually look back over some of the posts I've made, and what others have said about my answers before you jump to your conclusions.
What is it with some people on the Internet and overreacting...Message Edited by SSR on 04-20-2005 :49 PM

Similar Messages

Three tier (mod pl/sql) vs. two tier (PL/SQL Gateway)

I've been using 10g Database and 10g application server on separate servers for some time now.
Going the two tier (11g) route has some attractions, but what are the disadvantages?
The Oracle documentation I've seen says very little on making the decision, giving benefits as:
Ease of configuration
Included in the database
No separate server installation
- but no negatives.
Does anyone have any real live experience of comparing the two options?
I'm inclined to believe that three tier might have more tuning flexibility, better performance if each tier is on a different server. Maybe worse than two tier if on one server, assuming two tier eliminates communication overheads..
Does pl/sql gateway have the caching ability of Apache/mod pl/sql - I assume not? - that could make a big difference.
Any thoughts would be welcome...

There are several key performance advantages of OHS over EPG. I'm working a lot with the EPG right now and pushing the XDB team to add several of these features (maybe in 11.2, possible backport, but don't count on it). I used recommendations from the yslow Firefox add-in to do some performance tuning. Here's there list of Best Practices:
http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html
- EPG does not add an "Expires" header. So, lets say you have 25 images in your page template, and none of them change. Each page view will still request those 25 images. They use etags, so you don't have to download the images, but your browser still makes the requests which is quite slow. From my testing, pages could be up to 4 times slower with the EPG with a pretty standard template. The XDB team is aware of this and working hard to resolve it.
- EPG does not support gzip. This is another HUGE performance hit.
Keep in mind you can't test any of those issue with debug mode in APEX, you really need to use a browser plugin such as Firebug + ySlow. The render speed from APEX's point of view will be the same, no matter what HTTP server you use.
The other big on is mod_rewrite support. There is no way easily create friendly URLs for your apps. Another thing to consider is that a number of Identity Management systems, such as Oracle Access Manager (OAM) work by installing an Apache Module or in the case of IIS, some type of plugin (forget what they call it). There is no concept of this in EPG.
IMHO, it's convenient for laptops, but I would never use it for production unless you needed some feature that it exposes, such as WebDav or FTP access to the XDB repository...
Tyler

Upgrade from a two tier EBS 11i 11.5.10.2 on Windows 2003 Apps and Windows 2008 R2 DB tier to two Tier R12.2.3 both on Windows 2008 R2

Hi,
Any ideas about the best practices for the migration/upgrade reflected with the below question?
I have a source EBS11i 11.5.10.2 running as a two tier configuration ( apps tier on server ora10 on Windows 2003, DB tier 11.2.0.2 on server ora1 on Windows 8 R2. Can I use the Note 1377213.1 for a migration to a two tier configuration ( apps tier on server T10 running Windows 2008 R2 and EBS 12.2.3 and DB tier running 11.2.0.4 on Windows 2008 R2 )? What alternative approach could you suggest? As far as I know EBS11i is not certified on Windows 2008 R2 and R12.2.0 is not certified on Windows 2003.

Yes you can by following "Application Tier Upgrades and Migrations" section -- Install 12.2 apps tier on 64-bit Windows and proceed with the upgrade.
Oracle E-Business Suite Installation and Upgrade Notes Release 12 (12.2) for Microsoft Windows x64 (64-bit) (Doc ID 1330706.1)
Thanks,
Hussein

Converting from two tier to three tier environment

We are looking at converting our current two tier portal environment to a three tier environment. The database will stay on the machine where it is currently loaded I would like to move the 9ias home to a seperate machine and place it outside the firewall and utilize the dmz port for communications. Is there any documentation that deals with this process?
Thanks in Advance
Kevin

any body please suggest any links to implemet the said three tier systemBack 5 - 7 years ago the company I worked for did just that.
Previously had been running Forms 6 in client server mode.
The forms were massaged/tweaked/rewritten such that the EXACT same source code was valid for C/S & webforms.
I wrote a script that would nightly extract the Forms source & then compile using Forms 9 (at that time).
At the end of this process end users could run the application using either C/S or webforms.
One user at a time was converted from C/S forms to webforms.
It was a long but painless transition.
HTH

Existing two-tier enterprise online to two tier, root offline

I have went through many standalone to two tier discussions/forums, but found nothing conclusive on this topic.
I have inherited a online two tier architecture, and would like to implement some best practice work:
first step is to place the root CA offline. Based on what I have read I can do that by backing up current enterprise online root CA.
Then to install new root standalone CA on virtual box (switching to virtual) and use the onlines public key and same hostname to install the standalone. Make sure CRLs are placed on reachable network drive and so on...
The issuing CA will be the same. Nothing will change...other than adding additional later on.
Did I get this correct? Or will I have to reissue the root CA and have it be trusted on all firewalls/load ballancer, ect and reissue? Also we are pushing to two factor authentication with AD and cert based and I need to make sure I have my back-end ready.
If i go early ahead and implement user cert templates with current architecture, can I take root offline later and everything still will be in tact?

In a properly deployed PKI, the offline root CA is offline from build time. You should not be converting an enterprise root CA to a standalone root CA (how do you guarantee that the private key was not compromised prior to transition).
There is no way this would pass any form of audit (for example).
It sounds like you are early in the process, I recommend that you start over again and do it with a proper offline root CA.
Follow the steps in this link: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh831348.aspx
Brian

Two-tier ACE config question

Hi,
I am an ACE newbie - I have a two-tier ACE setup and I am basically trying to get the front-end ACE to divert to a sorry page if the back end servers hanging of the Back-end ACE do not reply to their probes.
I have the following setup...
Internet
|
DMZ ACE (doing SSL termination)
|
Reverse Proxy Server farm
|
Corporate LAN ACE
|
Application Server farm
DMZ ACE is probing Rev Proxy farm on TCP 2000 - and using sticky cookie insertion.
Corporate LAN ACE is probing App Server farm on TCP 2000 - and using sticky cookie insertion.
If the Application server farm becomes unavailable, I would like the DMZ ACE to detect this and then redirect the clients to a 'service unavailable' page hosted on the Reverse Proxy Servers.
My thought so far is the following...
DMZ ACE
rserver Rev_proxy1
rserver Rev_proxy2
probe icmp probe_icmp
ip address <App_Server_VIP>
serverfarm Rev_proxy_farm
probe probe_icmp
prove probe_tcp_2000
rserver Rev_proxy1, Rev_proxy2
So the above Rev_proxy_farm availability is tied to the appearance of the App Server vip due to the directed icmp probe to the Corporate LAN ACE VIP - the VIP will disappear if the App Server farm does not respond to it's TCP probe.
I am then not sure how to redirect the HTTP request to the Reverse Proxy Server seeing as though these have already been flagged unavailable.
Should I then follow 'Configuring a Sorry Server Farm' as per http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/services_modules/ace/v3.00_A1/configuration/slb/guide/classlb.html#wp1049254 to divert the connections from the Reverse_proxy:2000 to Reverse_proxy:3000 (which serves Service unavailable page)?
Any advice on whether this is the best way to go would be much appreciated.
Cheers,
Al

you need to create a redirect host and serverfarm and use this serverfarm as a backup serverfarm for your main serverfarm.
I'm not sure that the icmp ping will work.
Because the ping will be sent to dest ip address of the vip, but the dest mac-address ill the rev-proxy where your configured the probe.
Give it a try.
Gilles.

Two-Tier Firewall Config

We want to setup a Data Center Network for core banking with all the application and Database servers.For the same we are planning to design a Two-Tier firewall network architecture. First Tier firewall (Cisco PIX in failover mode) will have Web servers in DMZ as front end application server. Second Tier firewall (PIX firewall Failover mode) will have the Application and database servers in DMZ as back end servers.
Flow of data will be such that any user logging from internet will access web servers at the first level, get authenticated and web servers will in turn talk to the internal application servers for any data request.
Is the above design OK.
Pls find attached topology diagram.
Also provide me with the sample PIX config for the above Two-Tier firewall architecture implementaion of application and database servers.
Hi,
IP Scheme is as listed below.
Lan IP = 192.168.1.0/24 - 192.168.24.0/24
Internet Firewall DMZ Network (Tier-1) = 192.168.252.0/28
Internet Firewall Internal Network (Tier-1) = 192.168.252.16/28
Intranet Firewall External Network (Tier-2) = 192.168.252.16/28
Intranet Firewall DMZ Network (Tier-2) = 192.168.252.32.0/28
PiX Firewall Internal Network (Tier-2) = 192.168.252.48.0/28
Regards

Hi Collin,
This server is lync edge server. My idea is one network card for to NAT with public IP adddress ( 172.16.2.x NAT with Public IP ). One is for the Internal Firewall To NAT with internal network. (20.20.0.x NAT with internal IP 10.10.0.x).
Your suggestion is want to use one NIC with one IP address for DMZ server going to both firewall, is it ?
Please advise me, thanks.
Thanks,
Ko Htwe

Merging two LDAP directories into one clean 10.4 server.

What I have now is two different OD masters. One is a 10.3.9 server and the other is a 10.4.9 server. What I want to do is combine the two Open Directories into one on a brand new Xserve 10.4.9 install, and make that my only master with several replicas.
I'm trying to do as much research as possible before attempting this feat. I haven't been able to find much on here via searching. I did however, find this link (http://www.afp548.com/article.php?story=20050615173039158&query=migrate), which should be quite helpful, but I was wondering if anyone on here had anymore input.
Thanks in advance.

Hi Celia
I think you could achieve this using slapcat with a bit of ldapadd/ldapmodify? Manual pages should tell you more?
Not done it myself with 10.5 but I don't see why not? Export desired information as LDIF file(s). You could do it for for both LDAP Servers and then bring them in. They should just add to each other?
Worth a try?
Tony

How to copy app tier directories from node to node?

Hi.
The documentation for this cloning process, p5 of https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/f?p=130:14:5320863338933915562::::p14_database_id,p14_docid,p14_show_header,p14_show_help,p14_black_frame,p14_font:NOT,230672.1,1,1,1,helvetica
suggests that we "copy the following application tier directories from the source node to the target application tier node"
What is the UNIX command for this type of copy? I did ask our DBA yesterday, and he told me he would explain. That was yesterday and I am still waiting...
Thanks for any help.
AIX 5.2 (Oracle 9.2)
DA

If you have rsync installed on both the source and destination servers I would use it. I agree. Use the syntax in the following thread to use rsync command.
cloning step: copy source files to target
Re: cloning step: copy source files to target

I am getting a Two Tier Service from BT - Mods?

It just got me thinking, all us without iPlayer at the moment are effectively suffering.
We are paying the same charges for a service that is effectively a lower tier (bugs aside) compare to everyone that has iPlayer now. To me this is a two tier service.
Personally I think anyone that does not have iPlayer should be entitled to a rebate on their bill until they recieve it. Yes I know iPlayer is free and I agree the content is free, but somebody has to pay for the software that runs it? and lets face it iPlayer has a lot more content than Replay has?
And when these so called Linear channels come along (Linear TV via Broadband - Multicast) I bet the same thing will happen then, We will all pay the same monthly fee, some will have it, some will not, the have nots will effectively be getting ripped off as they are getting charged the same for a inferior service.
It happened before with ADSL/ADSL Max, and is happening now from what I can see with ADSL Max/Infinity.. People can get Infinity for the same price as ADSL Max.. i would love to have infinity for the same price where I am now but I doubt I will see it this side of 2020, same for Linear TV..
How much longer are people going to put up with this two tier service? Last time I checked with Virgin Media, the cost was different based on what you selected And what you could get....

Now you have changed the terms of the argument you are making from a two tier service to how BT rolls out products and try to compare it to browser upgrade.
You are not only shifting your point now but making an absurd comparison.
Think of it more akin to digital switchover. There are some places in the country that still can't get Freeview or even analogue Channel 5. There are places where even after DSO they only get a small number of channels.
If you take this back to your original argument then all of it two, three and four tier services and all who don't get everything should be compensated in some way. It really doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
Life | 1967 Plus Radio | 1000 Classical Hits | Kafka's World
Someone Solved Your Question?
Please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’
Helpful Post?
If a post has been helpful, say thanks by clicking the ratings star.

One site, two separate directories/roots?

I tried posting this via the newsgroup yesterday, but it
never showed up on this forum (I know why now after reading a
little closer). I've been thrown into the role of my department's
site/server admin at the last freakin' minute, and I'm hoping you
guys can help me out with a particular situation.
Here's the short version:
Is there a way for me to set up Dreamweaver to manage one
site over two completely separate folders (or perhaps set up as
separate 'sites'), and have it update links automatically between
both sites/folders as files are moved/changed just as it would with
one site? Virtual directories or similar server side items are not
an option.
Here the long version:
We have an in-house server that we've used for several years
to host both our website and shared directories for various files
used by our techs and managers. The web server is a mess because
over the years we've had several versions of our website built on
top of each other... an ugly mess which I have the pleasure of
cleaning up (oh joy!). We use IIS on the server (Win2K) to host the
site, and we have a virtual directory set up. We did this in order
to allow certain files to be viewable on our website, but actually
hosted outside of the site's root structure... so our managers
could update those files without us having to give them access to
make changes within the site's main file structure.
At the same time they hand me these new duties, I'm told that
our server is going bye-bye (lease is up) and instead of re-upping
the bosses want the site moved to the company's shared hosting. So
I have to have our site and share folders moved ASAP. This is
actually a very smart move, but it creates a bit of a dilemma for
me. We are only being allowed 100MB for our site, and we have a TON
of job-aids that far exceed the space that we're being given. We
are also using shared drive space (separate server) to host the
rest of our center's files, so I can move the bulk of those files
to the shared drivespace and create new links to them from our
site. Those that need to see/edit those items will have
permissions, the rest are out of luck, as it should be.
What makes this tedious is having to comb through and edit
each page to repair links to the content being moved to the non-web
space, not just during this cleanup but as future changes are made.
If there is a way that I could get Dreamweaver to recognize a
second 'root' so that as it would update links as I moved things
around and cleaned things up, that would be a HUGE help.
Any ideas?

Bump... anyone have any suggestions?

Ant jar two base directories

i'm writing an ant script that will jar the java .obj classes in the {classes} directory and the jar files in the {lib} directory.
my ant script is as follows
<target name="compile" depends="init" description="compile the source " >
     <echo message="compiling java source files" />
     <javac srcdir="${src}" destdir="${classes}" />
     <jar destfile="${classes}/MyApp.jar" basedir="${classes}" includes="**/*.class">
     <include name="build"/>
     <manifest>
     <attribute name="Main-Class" value="MyApp"/>
     <attribute name="Class-Path" value="../lib/activation.jar ../lib/log4j-1.2.8.jar ../lib/mail.jar ../lib/xercesImpl.jar ../lib/xmlParserAPIs.jar " />
</manifest>
     </jar>
</target>
how do i incude the baselib to look in two directories instead of one?
current;ly..it look at classes directory

jschell,
unfortuanetly that's what's i resorted to.
1. copy the jar file to classes directory
2. compile the the java src file (obj file --> classes director)
3. jar the classes directory contents
4. delete all files in classes directory (except for the newly created jar file)

How to join a Domain Controller Server to an two-tier (SQL Server 2012) and Sharepoint 2013 (SP2013) farm

Hi,
I am trying to build a 3-tier SharePoint 2013 farm.
1. SQL Server 2012, Windows 2012 VM
2. DC Server, Windows 2012 VM
3. SharePoint 2013, Windows 2012 VM
I didn't built the DC server. Someone else did. However, I created about 14 service domain user accounts for SQL Server and SharePoint install and operation.
I was able to join the SQL Server into the SharePoint server farm using SharePoint 2013 Product Configuration Wizard. When I start the Central Admin, and click on Servers in the Farm, I only see the SharePoint server and SQL server,
but the DC server is not listed. Any suggestion on what did I miss?
Thanks
Jean

You cannot join the Domain Controller to your SharePoint farm. You must instead join each server from that farm to the domain that is served up by that DC. You will want to uninstall SharePoint and probably SQL before you do this. If it's
an option, I would re-provision your VMs completely and start fresh. Once you login to a new server, join that server to the target domain like this:
http://www.petri.co.il/join-windows-server-2012-to-domain.htm
You'd have to ensure that your DNS resolves to the target domain on the server being joined to the domain. If it doesn't, you can always use HOSTS entries to overcome that in the short term.
Once you've joined both the future SQL and SharePoint servers to the domain, you can install SQL Server and then SharePoint on their prospective servers to create your farm.
I trust that answers your question...
Thanks
C
|
RSS |
http://crayveon.com/blog |
SharePoint Scripts | Twitter |
Google+ | LinkedIn |
Facebook | Quix Utilities for SharePoint

Three(two)-tier architecture - need help

Hello,
very need your advice about implementing 3-tier architecture with .NET.
My intention was to organize the following architecture: server contains data access layer and business layer, and ODP.NET is installed on the server, client requests business layer on the server through .NET Remoting. Business layer on the server returns typed data sets;objects on the server implement interfaces, which return data sets. So, client dlls need to reference only this data sets declaration (which are vendor independent) and interfaces, and no ODP.NET is needed on the client. The problem is that when I generate data source in Visual Studio 2008, it generates also references on ODP.NET, so I cannot reference this project in client application! While I need "pure" data sets, without ODP.NET references, but, at the same time, I want to use auto-generated adapters and not write code manually!
How can I do it?
Thanks in advance.. and need your reply!

For me, I will use Web Services to achieve this. Somehow, you can use other remoting method to do that as well.
Ming Man

Two Tier Upgrade Eligibility

I am about to upgrade from CS5 to CS5.5, and there are now two upgrade versions at different prices. If I buy the cheaper upgrade version of Premiere CS5.5, I need to have Premiere CS5. OK - I have but this CS5 is an upgrade version itself. My most recent full version is V1.5.
Now to my problem. If I buy this cheaper version, when I install CS5.5 I shall be asked for a serial number. No problem there, but it will be recognized as an upgrade and I will be asked for a serial number for CS5. I have this but it is not a full version, so will it be accepted?
One solution that occurs to me is to leave CS5 installed while I install CS5.5, but this must have the potential for problems.
A second idea is to un-install CS5, but take the option to leave the activation valid.
Can someone who has gone through this tell me what you have to go to get the upgrade activated?

Thank you Harm,
I do realise that when asked I shall have to provide the serial number for the CS5.5 upgrade!
My question remains - what then?
The CS5.5 upgrade from CS5 will want a valid serial number for CS5, but the one I have is also for an upgrade version.
What I am asking is for someone who has carried out this upgrade to tell me if there are problems. I do not want to spend several hours on a phone call to India, desperately trying to find a form of words that fits the "support" person's script.
I know that different versions of Premiere can co-exist, but it does seem to be a potential cause of problem to me.

MuVo: Two-Tier Director

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for