My Firefox 5 doesnt look the same as shown in getting started.

I downloaded Firefox 5. I to the Getting Started and Firefox looks completely different. I dont have any of the features shown. Why?

Have you installed any older versions of Firefox?
I remember someone installed Firefox 5.0 and had previous versions. I suggest that you uninstall Firefox 5.0 and any older versions, making sure that you have selected to delete Personal Information when prompted and then reinstall Firefox 5.0.
This is the only solution that I know of. However, I would prefer if you could show me a screenshot of the current browser so I can confirm that I am correct before uninstalling.
Hope that helps.

Similar Messages

FileSystemTree and "ordinary" Tree - make them look the same?

Hi,
I wondered if anyone's worked with Adobe AIR's FileSystemTree and the "ordinary" Tree in Adobe Flex, making them look the same? If so, can you give me some hints on how to make them look the same when it comes to icons, disclosure icons, branches, leafs etc.?
The reason I'm asking is this:
Some time ago I decided it'd be nice to build a sort of FTP Client with Adobe AIR. The client would, among other things, have a tree for local folders and a tree for remote folders. It seemed ideal to use the FileSystemTree for the tree containing local folders. The tree with remote folders is built using the "ordinary" Tree with data supplied via a Microsoft .NET Web Service. However, once I started down this road I soon realized the two controls don't look and behave the same (even though FileSystemTree apparently derives from Tree).
Some examples:
- Tree seems to use easing when opening a folder. FileSystemTree just "opens it".
- FileSystemTree displays a disclosure arrow icon regardless of whether or not a directory has children. Haven't got the Tree to display the same icon when a remote directory is empty.
Any help would be appreciated! I'd also like to point out that I'm quite new to both AIR and Flex so maybe the problems I see are actually easy to solve.
//Marcus

There is no bookmarks tab, expect you are referring to the bookmarks menu on the menu bar ("File, Edit, View, History, Bookmarks, Tools, Help") on your XP system.
Once your restore your menus on you Window 7 system, you can get rid of the bookmarks button. After going through the 10 steps below your toolbars on your Windows 7 system will be more usable again and like your XP system, none of which has anything to do with Sync.
You can make '''Firefox 6.0.1''' look like Firefox 3.6.*, see numbered '''items 1-10''' in the following topic [http://dmcritchie.mvps.org/firefox/firefox-problems.htm#fx4interface Fix Firefox 4.0 toolbar user interface, problems (Make Firefox 4.0 thru 8.0, look like 3.6)]. ''Whether or not you make changes, you should be aware of what has changed and what you have to do to use changed or missing features.''
* http://dmcritchie.mvps.org/firefox/firefox-problems.htm#fx4interface
the first 9 steps above are basic toolbar customization the following link is in step #1 above. (See before/after picture (.png) in the footnote)
*How do I customize the toolbars? | How to | Firefox Help
*:https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/how-do-i-customize-toolbars
<br><small>Please mark "Solved" one answer that will best help others with a similar problem -- hope this was it.</small>
There is a lot more beyond those first 10 steps listed, if you want to make Firefox more functional.
Before and after customizations, the following also includes [http://dmcritchie.mvps.org/firefox/firefox-problems.htm#fx4styles styling changes] besides rearranging toolbars and toolbar items.
* http://dmcritchie.mvps.org/icons/fx4toolbars.png
*:Bookmarks toolbar -- [http://userstyles.org/styles/46947 Bookmarks Toolbar Fx4 Blue/Folders, Red/Bookmarks]
*:Tab borders -- [http://userstyles.org/styles/24728 Tab Color Underscoring active/read/unread (Fx3.6)] red=active tab, blue=read, green=unread, magenta(not shown)=loading

How to choose witch window will open external links when using multiple Firefox profiles at the same time?

I am using 2 firefox profiles at the same, one for working and another for reading news. I start them with "firefox -no-remote -P profilename", so there are 2 firefox processes running.
It works well, but when I click a link in an external app (like in Google Talk), the link is opened in the first firefox process I launched. I mean, if I ran the "news" firefox first, it will always open the external links.
Is it possible to change this behavior? I'd like all external windows to be opened in the "news" firefox, never in the "working". Of course I'll achieve that if I open it first, but if I first run the "news", then the "working", then I close the news for any reason, now links will always open in the "working" until I close it.
I running linux (opensuse 11.3).

'''traysh''',
Profiles '''''period''''' are "unsupported" by Mozilla. Profiles are "there" but the developers want no part of non-developers using them or fixing anything related to Profiles that has been suggested in a Bug report, or documenting much related to Profiles. Profiles as we know them now are going to disappear from Firefox in the near future, although no specific version number or date has been fixed for that to happen. It is up to us user's to share our experiences with Profiles with other user's. I'm a relative noob to Linux, and all my experience with running multiple Profiles and -no-remote is with Windows OS's.
'''cor-el''',
So are you saying that on Linux external links will only open in the first Profile that was opened if multiple Profiles are running?
And that external links won't open a Profile that isn't already running - if any Profile is already running?
''I wish the differences between Windows and Linux as far as '''-no-remote''' and running multiple Profiles were better documented for "us" Linux noobs over at the MozillaZine KnowledgeBase - hint. Unless I am not looking hard enough in the MZ KB for that information....''

How can I get Lightroom to export my edit to a jpeg that looks the same ?

Hi everyone,
I can't get my jpeg export to look the same as it looks in lightroom after edit.
The jpeg isn't that different but still, way too much for me.
I did use sRVB, 100% no scaling etc... but it seems the export won't take "all" of my noise reduction correction..
This is a portrait shot in lowww light, and the raw file was rather crappy. Eventhough I was really happy with my smooth final edit but I can't get my jpeg to look as clean.. please someone help meee !
Regards,

What infos can I give you all to help me sort this problem out ?
export : quality 100%
             sRVB
             no scaling
In lightroom my image is just clean whereas after export, I can notice some artifacts or "moire", and it feels like the noise reduction/sharpen tool doesnt apply its correction as it should.. but it still does a bit bc it's not as if I turned it off completly...
This is driving me crazy
I'm about to install RC3 and try with it...

Does my own custom persona look the same on someone elses browser of differing res ?particularly the search and address boxes which i need to be pix perf.

Custom Personas! I have just spent some time getting an image to wrap round the search box.....will this look the same on another browser of a differing resolution?????

Probably not. A wider resolution will have the Location bar and the Search bar proportionally larger, but the size of the Persona header image won't be changed - just that more of the left side of that image will be shown.
Also, what if the user uses the "slider" ''(in the Customize mode)'' between the Location bar and the Search bar to make one larger and the other smaller? <br />
What about users who "customize" their Navigation bar by adding toolbar buttons, and maybe move the Search bar to a different Toolbar?
The only real way to get the UI and the header image to be "exact" for all resolutions is to create a full fledged Theme.

I sent a JPG with colorspace AdobeRGB1998 to myself via an email and it came back looking the same!

What happened? I was taught that the internet uses sRGB and so my returned JPG should have had the muted colors, same as Assigning a JPG to sRGB has. What am i missing?

Color-management is all about getting the most accurate view of the colors that you can so that you're viewing them as intended.
In an ideal world with ideal computers, every image would contain all the information needed to fully describe the colors in it, and every system would display those colors accurately in every application.
We're still kind of a long way off from that utopia, though every day things get a little better.
There are two schools of thought:
1. Casual users can be perfectly happy when red things look red and blue things look blue, but the colors may not be accurate at a subtle level. In this case, it can be possible to get many applications to match one another in the appearance of the images displayed on the same system, so things seem more consistent.
2. Professional or picky users may prefer to take the time to fully understand color-management, and calibrate and profile their systems, so that they can be sure what they're seeing is more accurate.
In practical terms, it can actually seem counter-intuitive to the first group that after having spent money on devices to calibrate and profile a system, that Photoshop now displays things differently than other applications, which may display things differently than one another.
Here are two possible scenarios, to illustrate this further:
1. A typical user has a monitor with a more or less standard color gamut and not hugely different from sRGB. So if this user both edits images in the sRGB profile, and has the sRGB profile associated with (and thus describing the characteristics of) the monitor, which is the Windows default, the following plays out... When the user displays an sRGB image:
A color transform by Photoshop from the image color space to the monitor color space does nothing (as both are identical), and the R,G,B pixel values from the image are sent to the monitor as is. The monitor does a passable, though possibly inaccurate, job of displaying the image.
Internet Explorer 9, which always does transforms from image color space to sRGB (regardless of monitor profile), also does nothing, so the image looks the same as in Photoshop.
A non-color-managed application (e.g., IrfanView with Color Management turned off for speed) does no color management transforms by definition, so R,G,B values are just sent to the monitor and the image looks the same as above. Earlier versions of IE and other earlier browsers do no color management and fall into this category as well.
An application that's supposed to be fully color-managed, but which has bugs (e.g., some versions of Firefox) or may not understand all variants of color profiles, very likely DOES work properly with the sRGB profile, since it's the default on Windows and is well formed, and thus displays an sRGB image with no transform, and it looks the same as in all the above cases.
An image expressed in a color space OTHER THAN sRGB will be inaccurately displayed by a non-color-managed application, but the color will only be as inaccurate as in all the above cases (because the monitor does not perfectly display sRGB) in properly functioning color-managed applications.
See the pattern in the above? Consistency.
2. Users seeking the most accurate possible color in their color-managed applications might choose high-end wide-gamut monitors (though even cheap monitors nowadays are starting to have wide gamuts), and might also purchase devices for calibrating and profiling their display(s) and printer(s). What they then experience is this:
Photoshop and other fully color-managed applications will display their images, regardless of color space, accurately. A particular tone of red will be just that tone, and this will be true no matter what color space the image uses.
Internet Explorer 9 will transform images from whatever color space to sRGB, so it will ALWAYS be inaccurate. How inaccurate depends on how different the actual monitor characteristics are from sRGB.
Non-color-managed applications will just display images without transform, so they'll be inaccurate depending on how different the image color profile is from the monitor's characteristics. Images could end up looking oversaturated on a wide-gamut monitor.
The color profile produced by the profiling software may not be perfectly well understood by all color-managed applications, leading to very strange displays.
Folks in this category understand when to expect differences, and are ready to work out problems so that they get accurate color from the applications they expect to be fully color-managed. They may avoid Internet Explorer and use Firefox or Safari instead so that they see accurate color from their browsers as well. Given all this, in the applications (like Photoshop) that matter to them, they can make use of the entire color gamut of their monitors and printers, and can convert to sRGB for web publishing as needed.
There is no easy answer as to which group is "better" to be in. It depends on your needs and expectations, and it's actually even possible to try to straddle the fence some, with a compromise between the above extremes.
I realize this may have raised more questions than it answered, but that is the nature of color-management. I encourage you to read all you can until it finally starts to click. Then you can make intelligent choices about which paths to take.
-Noel

Photos do not look the same after being uploaded to the web

Hey,
I have a problem with photos not looking the same as they do in LR when I upload them to the web.
Is there a fix for this?

>I now sometimes incorporate an "extra boost of saturation" in the
work flow in anticipation of the loss of saturation when I take the save for web option in CS.
>It is a bit arbitrary ... what is the view of the pros / experts on
this remedy?
This is a bad idea. The loss of saturation you see is only there on YOUR specific screen. It will not happen on other people's screens, except when they have a similar screen and graphic card as you. Other people might see much higher saturation on their screens. The point behind sRGB is that it provides an average target for the screen manufacturers. Screens cluster around it and so it is a REALLY bad idea to try to compensate for the problem in your specific screen. What you should do is refuse to use non-color managed webbrowsers as they will always lie to you. This means you have to use Firefox with the secret setting (see above) or Safari. If you use sRGB and a color-managed browser you will see what the average person sees. If you use sRGB and a color-dumb browser (i.e. IE) you will only see what you see.
P.S. I am assuming you hardware calibrate your screen. This is essential. Even when calibrated, colors will only be right in color-managed apps.

We have an older IMac (preIcloud) and just purchased a new Macbook Air. Our Iphones are set-up to synch with the IMAC and my calendars on the IMac & the phone look the same. But when I open ICal on the MacBook Air my calendar is missing items? Help..

We have an older IMac (preIcloud) and just purchased a new Macbook Air. Our Iphones are set-up to synch with the IMAC and my calendars on the IMac & the phone look the same. But when I open ICal on the MacBook Air my calendar is missing items? Help.

Are you wanting to import iCal to the MacBook Air. Since iCloud doesn't work with 10.6 OSX you probably don't have any data in iCloud yet?

How can I make a custom style look the same in both printed and online?

My specs:
RH 9.0.2.271
Windows 7, 64-bit
Word 2010
The Background Info:
So I created some custom css styles to try and mimic the look of a message box in our documentation. Here's the css code:
.MsgBox {
    color: #000000;
    border-left-style: Solid;
    border-right-style: Solid;
    border-top-style: Solid;
    border-bottom-style: Solid;
    font-size: 10pt;
    background-color: #eeeeee;
    border-left-width: 4px;
    border-right-width: 4px;
    border-top-width: 4px;
    border-bottom-width: 4px;
    border-left-color: #cdcdcd;
    border-right-color: #cdcdcd;
    border-top-color: #cdcdcd;
    border-bottom-color: #cdcdcd;
    width: 350px;
    padding: 5px 5px 5px 5px;
    box-shadow: 10px 10px 5px #888888;
    margin-bottom: 7pt;
.MsgBoxTitle {
    color: #000000;
    border-left-style: Solid;
    border-right-style: Solid;
    border-top-style: Solid;
    border-bottom-style: Solid;
    font-size: 10pt;
    background-color: #cdcdcd;
    border-left-width: 4px;
    border-right-width: 4px;
    border-top-width: 4px;
    border-bottom-width: 0px;
    border-top-color: #cdcdcd;
    border-bottom-color: #cdcdcd;
    border-left-color: #cdcdcd;
    border-right-color: #cdcdcd;
    width: 350px;
    padding: 5px 5px 5px 5px;
    box-shadow: 10px 10px 5px #888888;
My HTML Code:
<div class="MsgBoxTitle">
    PC-DMIS MESSAGE:
</div>
<div class="MsgBox">
    <p>Please do the following steps in the indicated order.</p>
    <p>1. Remove the current SH-1/2/3 stylus.</p>
    <p>2. Attach the SHSP (Stylus Holder Setting Piece).</p>
    <p>3. Jog the probe to a safe location with a clear line of approach
     to the port(s) being calibrated. </p>
    <p>4. Then click OK.</p>
    <p>After you click OK the machine will begin DCC measurement.</p>
</div>
The Expected Output:
Here's how it renders in a browser (the title is MsgBoxTitle, the body is the MsgBox style). I'm happy with how it looks there, even if the box shadow doesn't always display:
The Ugly Printed Output:
And here's what it looks like in the printed output.
Ugly. Are there any tricks to get the printable (doc) output to match the online? Ideally, on the printed output, I'd like to have all the white space in my pseudo message box removed so it looks just like the online.

Hi Peter. Thanks for the reply.
I assumed that if I used the project style sheet during the export, Word would convert the style so that it looked the same as in the HTML. Is that a bad assumption? I'm currently not mapping to any template equivalent for these message box styles. I did try it as one of my attempts, but I couldn't figure it out. It never seemed to take the style in the .dot.
Anyway, if I use just 1 style, such as just the MsgBox, I obviously don't get the white paragraph between the title and message. That white paragraph comes from the first <p> tag in the MsgBox style. But I need to have the <p> tags in there because they're better for our localization process than line breaks.
I did do some tweaks that made it look better. Basically I structured it so that the MsgBoxTitle div is now inside the MsgBox div. Something like this:
<div class="MsgBox">
    <div class="MsgBoxTitle">PC-DMIS MESSAGE: </div>
    <p>Please do the following steps in the indicated order.</p>
    <p>1. Remove the current SH-1/2/3 stylus.</p>
    <p>2. Attach the SHSP (Stylus Holder Setting Piece).</p>
    <p>3. Jog the probe to a safe location with a clear line of approach
     to the port(s) being calibrated.</p>
    <p>4. Then click OK.</p>
    <p>After you click OK the machine will begin DCC measurement.</p>
</div>
And then I adjusted my styles borders, padding, and thickness. That helped it look more connected, but still doesn't look quite right:
Would love to get rid of that white space after the title.
If you have time, I would be interested in a more detailed example of how you did it.

How do I make my animation look the same in different browsers?

Hi!
When I play my animation in different browsers it don't look the same as in the preview. In IE some of the parts of the animation have disappeared and in Chrome the pats are no longer in their right places. See picture below.
How do I do to make the animations look the same in different browsers?
(In the end I want to use the animations in my captivate 8 project. )
BR,
M

Ah, found the issue, the problem is with the name of the two images,
genomförande (instead you can use genomforande)
Grå bakgrund (instead you can use grabakgrund)
Seems like IE is having issue with those special characters.
hth,
Vivekuma

After editing image in Photoshop the saved result doesn't look the same in Lightroom

If I edit a photo in Photoshop and then save the photo, and then view the saved photo (not the original) back in Lightroom in Develop mode, the photo does not look the same as it does in Photoshop. The dark shadows have been crushed in Lightroom. If I look at it in Expose mode it looks good, but in Develop it the blacks and dark shadows are darker than the image appears in Photoshop. This is a newer problem for me, I'm not sure when it started.
I'm using:
Lightroom 5.5
Photoshop CC 2014
Mac Pro 8-core 2008
ATI Radeon HD 5770 GPU
Mac OS X 10.9.4
Apple 30" Cinema Display, calibrated with a Spyder3 Elite but the calibration doesn't seem to matter, I can change to another profile (e.g. a stock profile not from the Spyder) and still see the same problem.
This seems to happen with Photoshop CC prior to 2014 as well.

I'm using ProPhoto RGB in Photoshop. I have a test file that shows this issue: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/84023411/shadows_test.psd
This is a 16-bit ProPhoto RGB image with just 2 colors. The top part of the image is filled with RGB 10,10,10 and the bottom half is 0,0,0. If I open this file in Photoshop and use Apple's DigitalColor Meter utility to read the displayed values of the color of the top, using "Display native values", the result is 18,18,18. I expect it to be different than 10,10,10 due to the display profile but I would expect the same image viewed in Lightroom's Develop module to also read as 18,18,18 in the top half. But when I do this (import the PSD into Lightroom and open in Develop) the Meter reads 12,12,12. If I view the PSD in Loupe mode in Lightroom the Meter reads as expected, 18,18,18.
The difference should also be noticeable to your eye (at least mine) without using any measurements.
The result is that the dark shadows appear crushed when editing in Lightroom Develop mode.
The problem happens on both my 2008 Mac Pro with an ATI Radeon HD 5770 GPU and on my 2013 MacBook Air, although the values read on the Air are different than the Pro due to display profiles.
Normally, of course, I'm editing a RAW file in Lightroom and open that up in Photoshop (cmd+e), but this test seems to show that it happens with non-RAW files.

Why do vector lines appear different in my Photoshop document compared to the PDF that was created using "Scripts Layer Comps to PDF"? And how do I get them to look the same?

Why do vector lines appear different in my Photoshop document compared to the PDF that was created using "Scripts > Layer Comps to PDF"? And how do I get them to look the same?

BOILERPLATE TEXT:
If you give complete and detailed information about your setup and the issue at hand, such as your platform (Mac or Win), exact versions of your OS, of Photoshop and of Bridge, machine specs, what troubleshooting steps you have taken so far, what error message(s) you receive, if having issues opening raw files also the exact camera make and model that generated them, etc., someone may be able to help you.
Please read this FAQ for advice on how to ask your questions correctly for quicker and better answers:
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/419981?tstart=0
Thanks!

Conversion does not look the same?

I converted a pdf file to a word document last night and the page does not look the same. It is a weekly time log and the lines are messed up and the font is not placed correctly. Is there any way to fix this?

Good day,
What you described is fairly common for conversions where the PDF file that's being converted to Word wasn't originally created from Word. The service does the best it can to interpret the font data as well as the formatting, but as that information is often not present within the code of the PDF file, sometimes the resulting Word document does not exactly resemble the PDF file.
Kind regards,
David
Acrobat Community Manager
Adobe Systems

I applied a Photoshop effect to some outlined text - but the outlines still look the same?

1. I typed out the word
2. I created an outline of the word
3. I went to Effect>Photoshop Effects>Texture>Stained Glass and applied
However, if you look closely, the blue outlines ignore the the divots and holes created from the effet.
Is this effect just an overlay? I ask this because this design is for a t-shirt and I want it to look the same as it appears on my screen.
This may sound like a weird question but I'm just getting into Illustrator.
Thanks

Photoshop Effects produce raster images. You will have to use someting like a Grunge effect using actual vector objects for it to be useful for screening onto a tee-shirt.
Try looking here for some ideas
http://layersmagazine.com/designing-ultra-scenexcore-apparel.html

How can I keep my bookmarks updated live in Firefox & Chrome on the same PC?

I use both Firefox & Chrome on my notebook. I have a huge number of bookmarks set up & up until now I have to export/import my bookmarks between Firefox & Chrome on the same notebook on a regular basis to ensure that any updates or changes I make when using Chrome or Firefox are updated. This is very time consuming & means that either one or the other (FF or Chr.) are never truly synchronised or up to date.
Is there an easy way to ensure that any changes I make when using FF or Chr. are updated on a "live" or real time basis?
FYI - I do not wish to "sync" this data to any other hardware.

You can use Xmarks to synchronize bookmarks between Firefox and Chrome on the same PC. <br />
http://www.xmarks.com/about/features

My Firefox 5 doesnt look the same as shown in getting started.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for