My Flash Site looks very low in quality (I'm viewing in High Quality)

Hi all,
I am wondering why this Flash site I've designed is so rough
looking (indecipherable text, pixellated edges etc.).
Because I was working with content already created in
Illustrator (10), I copied them over to Flash (CS3) as vectors and
resized them. I'm guessing this method may be a big factor but even
text I added myself doesn't look as good as it should (namely the
buttons and text in the 'Lotus' section); I added my own text using
Flash.
Here are two examples of the site (only the Lotus and
Portfolio buttons work, clicking the Change and Grow icon takes you
back to the home page):
800x550
Resolution
Scales according
to window size
Also, if you go
here you will see a
simple jpeg.
I'd prefer to keep the site at 800x550 resolution without
rescaling but as you can see that isn't a good idea.
[L=This
site]http://ti.arc.nasa.gov/destination/iss/flash/index.html{/L]
uses very small text (in the case of the menu on a black
background) yet looks fine.
Also, the thumbnail on the Portfolio page looks very bad even
though it wasn't resized in any way using Flash (I reduced the size
of the original image in Photoshop and changed the DPI from 200 to
72, then imported it into Flash as a jpeg.
Any help at all is very much appreciated!
Niall
PS. I changed the text to bold to make it a little clearer
though I'd prefer to keep it regular.

"I copied them over to Flash (CS3) as vectors and resized
them" - what do you mean you copied over to Flash? Do you mean
import?
"text I added myself doesn't look as good as it should" -
check your anti-aliasing in Flash
"I'd prefer to keep the site at 800x550 resolution without
rescaling but as you can see that isn't a good idea." - no,
actually that is a good idea - not to rescale - any time you resize
a flash document with rastered graphics, you will get distortion
'uses very small text (in the case of the menu on a black
background) yet looks fine." - they are using pixel fonts
"Also, the thumbnail on the Portfolio page looks very bad
even though it wasn't resized in any way using Flash (I reduced the
size of the original image in Photoshop and changed the DPI from
200 to 72, then imported it into Flash as a jpeg." - looks fine to
me (on the unscaled version), but I don't have anything else to
compare it to - check your image compression settings in flash
(both under Publish Settings/flash tab and when you double click
the bitmap in the library you can control compression settings.
What level of compression are you using when saving from Photoshop?
The word "graphic design" looks better here
http://www.lotusgraphicdesign.net/
then here
http://www.lotusgraphicdesign.net/small.html
, but they are different sizes. Which is the original size?
Another note: "Because I was working with content already
created in Illustrator (10), I copied them over to Flash (CS3) as
vectors and resized them." if you actually imported an ai file into
flash, I know it also imports clipping masks and things of that
nature. When you resize an imported ai file, you may be getting
weird results from also resizing the clipping masks, too. When I
import an ai file, I break up everything as much as possible.
Depending on how you import your ai file, bitmaps will be created,
so make sure you stay away from bitmaps when possible when resizing
any symbol.
That's all I can really think of.

Similar Messages

  • Very low audio quality after amber update

    After installing amber update audio quality and volume has dropped significantly! Volume through speakers is alot lower, and when plugged into headphones audio lacks quality and depth. There is barely any bass and volume is very low, sounds like listening to a clock radio very disappointing, as audio quality on my 920 was very very good the best of any phone so far before amber update!

    i haven't noticed that with my 920. have you tried performing a soft reset and also check that you are up to date with all the latest Nokia system app updates from the Store?

  • Why is the audio of MSNBC, YouTube and other site videos very low when using Firefox?

    For several weeks now, when I view videos from msnbc.msn.com, youtube.com and other videos from other sites, the audio is so low....I can hardly hear it. But when I view the same videos using Google Chrome, the audio is very good.
    == URL of affected sites ==
    http://www.youtube.com

    Did you check the volume setting in the Flash player?
    Do those Flash players have a volume button that opens a slider?
    Clear the Flash cookies and settings.
    Flash Local Storage - http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings_manager07.html
    The Flash object on that page shows the local storage on your computer.
    You can also delete the macromedia.com and #SharedObjects folders to reset all Flash cookies and settings.
    XP: C:\Documents and Settings\<user>\Application Data\Macromedia\Flash Player\
    Vista: C:\Users\<user>\AppData\Roaming\Macromedia\Flash Player\
    (AppData is a hidden folder: http://kb.mozillazine.org/Show_hidden_files_and_folders )

  • Ken Burn pictures look really low quality

    Putting high quality pictures into movie and when I ad ken Burns affect they look very low quality as the effect is in process. Do I need to add a lower quality pic? Any suggestions would be very much appreciated.
    Keith

    they look very low quality as the effect is in process.
    usual advice:
    never judge pic quality within iM (lowered preview quality) nor on a computer either.. (iM is for TV delivery.. iM≤6 ... )

  • Why is it that when I connect my iPhone 5S to my Windows Vista computer, the photos made with my iPhone are all of very low quality and most of them are turned upside down?

    Why is it that when I connect my iPhone 5S to my Windows Vista computer, the photos made with my iPhone are all of very low quality and most of them are turned upside down?
    On another note, the iPhone tells me that it's ''busy'' when opening a photo on the computer.
    (I tried restarting my PC, connecting via another USB port, importing using PhotoStream, etc...)

    Are you using the front or rear camera? When you say they are low quality, are you referring to file/pixel size, or how the picture looks? As far as upside down, how are you holding the phone? Older versions of Windows have issues reading the Metadata from the pictures and will not display the same.

  • After import from Iphoto some pictures are of very low quality. The original file in Iphoto is very good.

    Final cut Express
    I imported several pictures by using Iphoto. Some of them, not all, are of very low quality even if the original file is of a very good quality.

    It sounds as though you may have imported the thumbnails but I can't imagine how.
    It all depends on what you mean by very low quality.
    Your iPhoto  pictures will be around 4,000x3,000 pixels but when they are imported into a standard def timeline they will be around 720x540 which is a tremendous reduction.
    They should still look OK but not  as good as the brilliant hi-res originals.
    Message was edited by: Ian R. Brown

  • DVR replay on the non-DVR STB - very low quality

    I started recording a football game on the DVR, and about 45 minutes later I began to watch it on the non-DVR setbox in another room.  The quality is very low: every 10 seconds (almost exactly) the picture gets very choppy, stops and starts.
    On the DVR itself, the replay is good.
    Is this a known problem with the STB?

    Have you attempted re-booting both STBs? 

  • ''Well When i plug in my ipod touch the battery life is low..i let it sit a wyhle.And it starts up to the apple logo and it stay there some time then it restartsback over to the very low battery and repeat(Over&Over)?

    ''Well When i plug in my ipod touch the battery life is low..i let it sit a wyhle.And it starts up to the apple logo and it stay there some time then it restartsback over to the very low battery and repeat(Over&Over)

    Can you reset the device by holding the sleep and home button until the Apple logo comes back again?
    If this does not work, try to connect in recovery mode, explained here: iOS: Unable to restore

  • Do Flash Sites appear? if not what happens and what does it look like?

    Has anyone tried any Flash based websites to see what it looks like?
    If anyone has any screen captures or photos of the iPhone viewing Flash sites, I'm interested to see what happens before I buy an iPhone. Thanks

    Hi,
    Right now you cannot download anything to the Iphone, as there is no user access to the file system.
    You can download to your computer and then sync to move pictures, songs, etc to the phone through itunes for now.
    Hope this helps!
    Andy
    Message was edited by: Host

  • Still images have very low quality

    When I import images into Final Cut Express they are pixelated and look very bad. When I open the same image in Preview the image is displayed at full quality. How can I fix this? I am running Final Cut Express 2.0.3.
    Thanks for your help
    iBook G4 1.2GHz 768MB   Mac OS X (10.4.3)  

    Yes, I am looking at the output rendered on a monitor.
    Are you saying that my vidieo is compresed?
    How might I uncompress it?

  • Rendered video very low quality

    My camera shoots in MTS format. I converted the file to mp4 and edited it. I then imported that footage into After Effects and when I tried to render the video it was very low quality. I made sure the composition settings and render settings matched that of my video. I tried saving it as H.264, mov, avi, m4v, and mpeg2 non of which were good enough quality to use. The avi format came close in quality for the video but everything seemed to move in slow motion. The audio played perfectly though. I also tried rendering video directly from the MTS file and it still didn't work.
    Is there a specific way I should convert or encode the file? I tried some different settings within Adobe Media Encoder but when I brought the file into AE and tried to render I got the same issues of it being low quality.
    This is for a client so it's very important that I get the needed effects added to this video. Thanks in advance for any help!

    I understand how After Effects rendering works and different file types. I just wanted to try rendering in different formats just make sure I hadn't missed something. I figured something out that came close to the quality I need so I guess it will have to work.
    My original MTS file is 1920 x 1080 and 29 fps.
    I rendered it with these settings originally
    NTSC, 1920 x 1080
    29.9 fps
    Bitrate CBR 30 Mbps
    The file came out choppy and noticeably lower quality.
    The last time I rendered it with these settings:
    NTSC, 1280 x 720,
    59.94 fps
    Bitrate CBR 20 MBps
    The quality was much much better. It still had a little distortion with a lot of movement but it was much more bearable so I guess that's what I'm going with. If anyone knows of any better settings it would be greatly appreciated! Thanks.

  • Looking for FLV player with playlist for my Flash site

    I've been looking for an FLV player that I can embed "inside" my flash site--most likely loaded as an external swf via loadClip inside my main swf file.  I also need it to be AS2 compatible for my current project.  If anyone has some ideas please share, thanks.
    -David

    I have a sample here http://www.smithmediafusion.com/blog/?p=337 that uses an rss feed as the playlist.
    Regards,
    Dan
    http://www.dsmith.tv
    http://www.smithmediafusion.com/blog

  • Video files show very low resolution poster image

    Using Indesign CC and the latest tools and content viewer I am creating Autoplay video animations for the cover of our weekly magazine.
    With each issue I have published the same problem occurs where the poster image for the video file is very low resolution and makes our content look very amateur (for a brief moment) before playing the video file at full resolution.
    I have tried creating animations using flash, photoshop and Edge Animate, exporting MP4, MOV and OAM files. The problem is present with all movie files and with the Edge animation files a white flash appears before the file plays.
    Is there a solution for either of these issues? We are looking to continue to use animations for our covers and need them to look 100% crisp and clean.

    Sorry to jump in but I'm having the same issue too!
    I have an H.264 mp4 which I created in After Effects and inserted using the Media panel within DPS.
    As you see below, it plays on page load and I have chosen the finished front cover to be the poster image when it ends from within the Folio Overlays panel. I have set the video to stop on the last page.
    When the video stops you can see all the artifacting around the text which I would expect to be as crisp as the original PSD file I uploaded as the poster image.
    Is there anything I'm doing wrong or is there anything that can improve the quality of the final still?

  • Very Poor Image Quality In Viewer, JPEG Artifacts

    I upgraded to Aperture 3 some time ago, and purchased a new Mac Pro specifically for this application.  I am an amature/ sometime professional photographer and I have been using Aperture since Version 1.  This weekend I finally had some time to sit down with Aperture 3 for some serious work with my scanned film images.  These are large TIF masters scanned in with my Nikon CoolScan 9000.  Some are medium format black & white Tri-X Pan images, others are 35mm, also black & white Tri-X Pan.  Everything scanned in on the Nikon is at the maximum resolution for the master, on the theory that I can always bump it down later if that's necessary.
    I am noticing vastly lower image quality in the viewer then with Aperture 2.  Specifically, I am seeing massive JPEG artifacts in the viewer image then I have ever seen before.  The images also render darker in the viewer then before. These artifacts do not appear when I export my images (say as JPEGS for posting to a web page), or when I print them.  The quality of the exported and print images seem just fine and the exported JPEGS are completely free of the artifacts I am seeing in the viewer.
    I have tried rebuilding the previews several times, experimenting with different quality settings.  I have experimented with different proof profile settings.  My printer is an Epson Stylus Photo R1800 and I have tried various paper settings for it as well as other proof profile settings such as the Adobe and Apple RGB settings and the generic grey profiles.  Every time I change a setting I have forced a rebuild of the previews to no detectable effect.  Nothing I do seems to have any effect whatsoever on the image quality in the viewer which remains relentlessly the same as it always was.
    This poor viewer image quality is making it very difficult to work in Aperture 3.  I suspect there is a setting somewhere like an easter egg in this new Aperture I haven't found yet but it is becoming very frustraiting and I could use a pointer because, again, nothing I have tried has changed the image quality in the viewer in any way I can detect and the photos look perfectly awful there...darker and loaded with JPEG artifacts. Things export and print just fine, but I need to see what I am going to get in the viewer or I can't do my work.

    I interpret this as ... Eventually you should be looking at the Master with the Version changes applied. I'm assuming at this point, you aren't looking at the Preview. Since you don't need Previews to view and edit your images.
    Yeah...that's sort of what I gleaned from that text. I was experimenting with the preview settings because I couldn't see any other way to fix the problem.  What I'm hearing now is that the problem has no fix.  If you scan in black & white film negatives (or anything else that's monochrome I suppose) with the color space set as gray scale you are asking for trouble.  The sense I get from the text Gomez Addams referred me to is the behavior in that case is unpredictable, and furthermore film photographers aren't the customer base Apple is trying to cultivate with this product.
    Aperture is designed to work with images from digital cameras which use an RGB color space...
    Okay...fine.  I have several digital cameras I occasionally use for professional work and I am here to tell you Aperture is an absolute blessing for that work. I do shoots every now and then for a local community newspaper and I would not want to live without this product. I remember back when I was a teenager in the 70s being up all night in the darkroom to get an assignment I'd had to cover right before deadline, and then go to my day job the next morning without any sleep. This is much better. And even with the personal art photography it is good to be able to just scan things in and make adjustments in the computer.  You can do so much more. I would not want to go back. 
    But I reckon I need to find something I can rely on for my film work, or at least my black & white film work because as I read this Apple is not supporting film photography with this product and black & white film photography in particular and some of us still use film. No...scanning in my Tri-X negatives in the CoolScan as color produces weird results and anyway Photoshop and GIMP for goodness sakes seem to handle grayscale files just fine. Plus, I've already got thousands of those negatives scanned, I am not rescanning all that in RGB just to satisfy Aperture. The color slide film scans don't seem to be a problem, but that's now. I think I'm being told not to count on That always being the case either.
    Aperture is designed to work with images from digital cameras...
    Okay...fine...film is old technology after all, Nikon isn't even making their film scanners anymore...check the prices on the few still new-in-the-box ones left out there. My CoolScan 9000 is selling for twice on the second-hand market what I paid for it new and new it wasn't cheap. And yet it's not economically viable for Nikon to continue making them. Film is dying. But I still like working with film and film cameras and I reckon I'll keep doing that until I can't get any more of it and my stash of Tri-X Pan bulk rolls runs out.
    Thank you all very much for your help. I think I see what I need to do now.

  • Very low sound

    Just purchased Mini Notebook NB205-N230.  I am very disappointed in the sound quality.  All the speaker icons indicate they are at 100% and nothing is muted.  What do I do?  Thanks

    It appears the NB205-N230 uses some form of Realtek audio drivers. If this is the case check for and enable "Loudness Equalization" on the Speaker Properties. This has helped improve the low audio levels on other Toshiba latpops. Under Windows 7 Home with the Realtek HD audio drivers the "Loudness Equalization" check box can be found on the Control Panel --> Hardware and Sound --> Sound --> Speakers (select Speakers then select the Properties button) --> Enhancements tab. "Loudness Equalization" is found under the enhancement options list (may have to scroll down the list to find it). Another way to enable the "Loudness Equalization" option if you find a Realtek Audio Manager icon under the Hardware and Sound page, is to look on the Sound Effects tab of the Audio Manager and enable the "Loudness Equalization" check box and click OK to save the settings.
    Other suggestions are to update the audio drivers from either the Toshiba support site or from the Realtek site and enable "Loudness Equalization" if the option is available. On my L505 series laptop the default installed audio drivers and the updated Toshiba ones both exhibited very low audio. Uninstalling the Toshiba version that came with the laptop and installing the Microsoft generic audio driver or installing the latest Realtek drivers from Realtek and enabling "Loudness Equalization" helped improve the system sounds audio volume level.

Maybe you are looking for