My four year old iMac is running much slower than when it was new.  Any suggestions on cleaning out the cob webs?

My four year old iMac is running much slower than when it was new.  Does anyone have any suggestions on what I can do to "clean it up" and get it running like it used to?

What year, screen size, CPU speed and amount of RAM installed?
To find out info about your system,
Click on the Apple symbol in the upper left of the OS X main menu bar. A drop down menu appears.
Click About this Mac. A smaller popup window appears. This gives you basic info like what version of OS X your iMac is running, the speed of your iMac's CPU and how much RAM is installed.
Click on the button that says More Info. A larger window appears giving you a complete overview of your iMac's hardware specs.
Highlight all of this info and copy/paste all of this into another reply to this post, editing out your iMac's serial number before actually posting the reply.
This will tell us everything about your iMac so we may begin to help with your iMac issues.
How full is your Mac's hard drive?
Locate your iMac's hard drive icon on the OS X desktop. Click the icon once, then use the keyboard key combination Command-I. This will give you additonal info about your iMac's internal hard drive.  
Post this info in your reply here, also.
Here are some general tips to keep your Mac's hard drive trim and slim as possible
You should never, EVER let a conputer hard drive get completely full, EVER!
With Macs and OS X, you shouldn't let the hard drive get below 15 GBs or less of free data space.
If it does, it's time for some hard drive housecleaning.
Follow some of my tips for cleaning out, deleting and archiving data from your Mac's internal hard drive.
Have you emptied your Mac's Trash icon in the Dock?
If you use iPhoto, iPhoto has its own trash that needs to be emptied, also.
If you store images in other locations other than iPhoto, then you will have to weed through these to determine what to archive and what to delete.
If you use Apple Mail app, Apple Mail also has its own trash area that needs to be emptied, too!
Delete any old or no longer needed emails and/or archive to disc, flash drives or external hard drive, older emails you want to save.
Look through your other Mailboxes and other Mail categories to see If there is other mail you can archive and/or delete.
STAY AWAY FROM DELETING ANY FILES FROM OS X SYSTEM FOLDER!
Look through your Documents folder and delete any type of old useless type files like "Read Me" type files.
Again, archive to disc, flash drives, ext. hard drives or delete any old documents you no longer use or immediately need.
Look in your Applications folder, if you have applications you haven't used in a long time, if the app doesn't have a dedicated uninstaller, then you can simply drag it into the OS X Trash icon. IF the application has an uninstaller app, then use it to completely delete the app from your Mac.
To find other large files, download an app called Omni Disk Sweeper.
Download an app called OnyX for your version of OS X.
When you install and launch it, let it do its initial automatic tests, then go to the cleaning and maintenance tabs and run the maintenance tabs that let OnyX clean out all web browser cache files, web browser histories, system cache files, delete old error log files.
Typically, iTunes and iPhoto libraries are the biggest users of HD space.
move these files/data off of your internal drive to the external hard drive and deleted off of the internal hard drive.
If you have any other large folders of personal data or projects, these should be archived or moved, also, to the optical discs, flash drives or external hard drive and then either archived to disc and/or deleted off your internal hard drive.
Good Luck!

Similar Messages

  • My two-year old imac is getting much slower, how do i speed it up?

    My iMac, with a 3ghz process, 4gb of memory, 1TB hard drive, is becoming slower and slower, especially when booting up.  I used to be a Windows person, and this slowness reminds me of that problem.  I am assuming that the Mac accumulates a bunch of junk over time.  Is there a utility that I can purchase or get that will speed my machine up?
    Thanks.

    It does many other things; I would only run Onyx for caches. Probably the safest maintenance/toubleshooting program is Applejack, which may help in this situation. I'd run it as "applejack AUTO" first and then go back and run it in "applejack" for your user. The first restart will be slower than usual as it rebuilds the boot caches. It may take several restarts to see the full benefit.
    http://sourceforge.net/projects/applejack/
    Article on how to use it
    http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-13727_7-10334620-263.html?tag=mfiredir
    Also, check free space on the drive. You should maintain around 15-20% free.

  • After downloading the Firefox browser update "RadioWMPCoreGecko 5.dll" file my computer runs much slower than before. Ist there any help available?

    Information by Norton Security, that ''RadioWMPCoreGecko 5.dll'' is safe. The installation started without any hesitation and -even worse - without asking my permission although my settings require this.

    Here is a thread about a similar issue with RadioWMPGecko19.dll (no real answers)
    *[[/questions/878063]]
    *[[/questions/902381]]

  • 3 year old iMac 24 running OS10.7.4.  After it has been on for a day or so, it stops going to sleep and becomes very slow.  This only happens when Safari is running. Quitting Safari solves the problem.  Has anyone else have the same problem?

    3 year old iMac 24 running OS 10.7.4.  After it has been on for a day or so, it stops going to sleep and becomes very slow.  This only happens when Safari is running. Quitting Safari solves the problem.  Has anyone else have the same problem?  Does not happen on MacBookpro only on iMac.

    Hello Albert, see how many of these you can answer...
    See if the Disk is issuing any S.M.A.R.T errors in Disk Utility...
    http://support.apple.com/kb/PH7029
    Open Activity Monitor in Applications>Utilities, select All Processes & sort on CPU%, any indications there?
    How much RAM & free space do you have also, click on the Memory & Disk Usage Tabs.
    Open Console in Utilities & see if there are any clues or repeating messages when this happens.
    In the Memory tab, are there a lot of Pageouts?

  • Four-year-old iMac and Mountain Lion

    My wife has a four-year-old iMac that has been horrendously slow for the last couple of years. This has been true with nearly all the programs, but especially Word for Mac and Outlook (both part of Microsoft Office for Mac) -- even when only three or four programs are open at a time. Click Outlook, for example, and you can wait a minute and half for it to open while it checks identities.
    I just upgraded the machine to Mountain Lion hoping that might solve some problems but the situation is even worse now. She clicked on Message last night as I was standing there and I finally gave up waiting and walked away. Frankly, the speed of the machine under both Lion and now, worse, Mountain Lion is driving us crazy.
    So, what to do?
    Should I be doing some sort of in-depth analysis of the the current machine? (A little background: three months after buying it, it had a problem and Apple Service ended up replacing the screen and the motherboard.)
    Or should I just buy a new iMac and forget about this machine ever being fast enough?
    Here are the specs on the current iMac:
    Model Name:                    iMac
    Model Identifier:              iMac8,1
    Processor Name:              Intel Core 2 Duo
    Processor Speed:              3.06 GHz
    Number Of Processors:   1
    Total Number Of Cores:  2
    L2 Cache:                           6 MB
    Memory:                            4 GB
    Bus Speed:                         1.07 GHz
    Thank you for any advice.
    Don

    Your computer is on the very low end of systems which are supported by Mountain Lion. Anything newer than Snow Leopard will likely hurt performance rather than help it.
    When your computer is freezing up, it is probably loading data from the disk into RAM. You can't put any more RAM into the machine, but you can have the hard drive upgraded to an SSD. That's quite a bit of money to pour into a five-year-old machine, but it's a lot cheaper than getting a new computer.
    One other option is to back up your files, wipe everything, and start over. Install the applications one at a time until things start to slow down. You may have an application that is sitting in the background and using up system resources.

  • Can iMac be updated or just get new one? On iMac with OSX10.5.8, 2Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo--it's so much slower than iPad. It hasn't had cache cleaned or "First aid". I'm wondering if a computer store/techie can clean/update it or better to put $$ towards new

    Can iMac be updated or just get new one? On iMac with OSX10.5.8, 2Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo--it's so much slower than iPad. It hasn't had cache cleaned or "First aid". I'm wondering if a computer store/techie can clean/update it or better to put $$ towards new?

    If you want to clean up your hard drive some, here are some of my tips, also.
    Hard drive getting full or near full?
    Do a search for and downlaod and install OmniDisk Sweeper and OnyX.
    Here are some of my tips for deleting or archiving data off of your internal hard
    Have you emptied your iMac's Trash icon in the Dock?
    If you use iPhoto, iPhoto has its own trash that needs to be emptied, also.
    If you use Apple Mail app, Apple Mail also has its own trash area that needs to be emptied, too!
    Other things you can do to gain space.
    Delete any old or no longer needed emails and/or archive older emails you want to save to disc, Flash drive/s or to ext. hard drive.
    Look through your Documents folder and delete any type of old useless type files like "Read Me" type files.
    Again, archive to disc, Flash drive or ext. hard drive and/or delete any old documents you no longer use or immediately need.
    Uninstall apps that you no longer use. If the app has a dedicated uninstaller, use it to completely uninstall the app. If the app has no uninstaller, then just drag it to the OS X Trash icon  and empty the Trash.
    Also, if you save old downloaded  .dmg application installer  files, you can either archive and delete these or just delete the ones you think you'll never install, again.
    Download an app called OnyX for your version of OS X.
    When you install and launch it, let it do its thing initially, then go to the cleaning and maintenance tabs and run all of the processes in the tabs. Let OnyX clean out all web browser cache files, web browser histories, system cache files, delete old error log files.
    Typically, iTunes and iPhoto libraries are the biggest users of HD space.
    If you have any other large folders of personal data or projects, these should be thinned out, moved, also, to the external hard drive and then either archived to disc, Flash drive or ext. hard drive and/or deleted off your internal hard drive.
    Good Luck!

  • In CS6, JavaScript Running MUCH Slower than ActionScript

    Hi All,
    I am finding that in CS6, JS code runs MUCH slower than ActionScript code. I don't want to double-post here - Full details may be found where I posted them in the InDesign Scripting forum at  - CS6 JavaScript Running Much Slower than ActionScript, before I realized that this forum might be more appropriate.
    The basic gist of it is that I had a Flex/ActionScript Extension, which I obviously needed to start converting to JavaScript in advance of the next version not supporting ActionScript. I converted 20,000 lines of my business logic code from ActionScript to JavaScript (grrr...) - only to find that it now runs 5 times slower than it did in ActionScript.
    What has been the experience of others who have converted large Extensions from ActionScript to JavaScript?
    I would greatly appreciate any and all suggestions.
    TIA,
    mlavie

    Hi All,
    I am finding that in CS6, JS code runs MUCH slower than ActionScript code. I don't want to double-post here - Full details may be found where I posted them in the InDesign Scripting forum at  - CS6 JavaScript Running Much Slower than ActionScript, before I realized that this forum might be more appropriate.
    The basic gist of it is that I had a Flex/ActionScript Extension, which I obviously needed to start converting to JavaScript in advance of the next version not supporting ActionScript. I converted 20,000 lines of my business logic code from ActionScript to JavaScript (grrr...) - only to find that it now runs 5 times slower than it did in ActionScript.
    What has been the experience of others who have converted large Extensions from ActionScript to JavaScript?
    I would greatly appreciate any and all suggestions.
    TIA,
    mlavie

  • A four year old iMac

    Good Morning,
    How can I unlock the Recovery HD on my  4-5 year old iMac? Below are the steps I have gone through.
    Just about when the extra extended warranty was about to run out the iMac Superdrive quit. I thought I had a few months left of extended warranty but I did not!
    Last week this iMac was running slow, pages would take forever to load.
    I decided to put as many of my files on an external hard drive.
    Then I rebooted holding down the command and R key opening Disk Utility and secure erase my hard drive. This took a few hours.
    After this was completed I got out of Disk Utilities and went above and clicked on Reinstall OS X which was OS X Mountain Lion clicked continue, clicked agree before installing OS X Mountain Lion. Now this window came up "OS X Mountain Lion select the disk where you want to install OS X.
    Recovery HD 650 MB total. 155.5 ava or Macintosh HD 319.21 GB total.318.79 GB. Then I noticed that only the Macintosh HD was my install choice because the Recovery HD was paled out and I could not click on it.
    When I did click on the paled out Recovery HD it would tel me that "This Disk is Locked".
    Now I clicked on Macintosh HD and pressed install, now I put in my Apple ID and Password and pressed Sign In.
    Then a window appeared "This item is temporarily unavailable. Try again later. Well, I must have done this at least ten times.
    I phoned Apple and they told me that this Mac OS X Mountain Lion is no longer available in the Apps Store.
    I should click on the Recovery HD icon and install. This is where it reads "This disk is locked."
    I would really like to use this iMac.
    Any ideas?
    Thank you.
    Abi

    Hi Babowa,
    I just rebooted holding the Command + Option + R, erased Macintosh HD.
    Below is what I see on the Disk Utility after the erase.
    Mount Point : /Volumes/Macintosh HD
            Format : Mac OS Extended (Journaled)
    Owners Enabled ; Yes
    Number of Folders : 3
    Capacity : 319.21 GB (319,213,174,784 Bytes)
    Available : 318.79 GB (318,788,182,784)
          Used : 425 MB (424,992,768 Bytes)
    Number of Files : 2
    I still can't go any further.
    If only my internal SuperDive was working I could put in the original CD.
    Please any advice and I will try to make this iMac work!
    I hate to throw it out.
    Abi

  • I just restored my 24 inch imac and it seems to be running MUCH slower than before. Any Ideas why? thanks in advance for your help!

    I have erased and restored my 24 inch Intel iMac. I have upgraded to the last version of X os. My system is running WAY slower than it was before. Even opening windows seems to lag and the spinning wheel come up for everything. Every task is slow, even typing this! lol
    Here are my specs:
    Model Name:          iMac
      Model Identifier:          iMac8,1
      Processor Name:          Intel Core 2 Duo
      Processor Speed:          2.8 GHz
      Number Of Processors:          1
      Total Number Of Cores:          2
      L2 Cache:          6 MB
      Memory:          4 GB
      Bus Speed:          1.07 GHz
      Boot ROM Version:          IM81.00C1.B00
      SMC Version (system):          1.30f1
    Any ideas would be helpful. Is this a hardware issue?
    Thanks!

    Matt:
    Thanks for the update. It is good to know that the maintenance procedures helped. Regular maintenance and a good backup are key to computer security. Gulliver's article has a suggested schedule. Dr. Smoke's FAQ on Backup and Recovery has excellent information and advice. I part company with him on his insistence on Retrospect, which I have found to be difficult to use. SuperDuper has been shown the best backup software in these tests.
    If you usually leave your computer on or asleep, it is good practice to shut down and start up in Safe Mode occausionally. I do it about once weekly.
    Good luck.
    cornelius
    Message was edited by: cornelius

  • Parameterized queries running much slower than ones with hardcoded values

    Very often there is a huge performance difference when using parameters in a query, compared to running the same code after replacing the parameters with hardcoded values: the parameterized version of the code runs much slower!
    The case is not parameter sniffing as it is not a (compiled) stored proc, but code executed directly from the editor and the performance issue has been observed in different versions of SQL Server (2000 and 2005).
    How is this explained and how can the parameterized queries have similar performance with the hardcoded ones?
    Also, why does this happen in some cases and not always?
    Finally, the same is sometimes the case with stored procs: a very slow running proc speeds up tremendously when running its code directly, instead of calling the procedure --and even faster, according to the previous, when its parameters are replaced with
    hardcoded values 

    >>The case is not parameter sniffing as it is not a (compiled) stored proc, but code executed >>>directly
    from the editor ?>>>and the performance issue has been observed in different >>>versions of SQL Server (2000 and 2005).
    Something like below?
    --SQL Server creates 3 execution plan rather only one
    DBCC FREEPROCCACHE
    GO
    SELECT *
    FROM Sales.SalesOrderHeader
    WHERE SalesOrderID = 56000
    GO
    SELECT * FROM
    AdventureWorks.Sales.SalesOrderHeader WHERE
    SalesOrderID = 56001
    GO
    declare @i int
    set @i = 56004
    SELECT *
    FROM Sales.SalesOrderHeader
    WHERE SalesOrderID = @i
    GO
    select  stats.execution_count AS exec_count, 
    p.size_in_bytes as [size], 
    [sql].[text] as [plan_text]
    from sys.dm_exec_cached_plans p
    outer apply sys.dm_exec_sql_text (p.plan_handle) sql
    join sys.dm_exec_query_stats stats ON stats.plan_handle = p.plan_handle
    GO
    ----This time only (we get parameterization)
    DBCC FREEPROCCACHE
    GO
    EXEC sp_executesql N'SELECT  SUM(LineTotal) AS LineTotal
    FROM Sales.SalesOrderHeader H
    JOIN Sales.SalesOrderDetail D ON D.SalesOrderID = H.SalesOrderID
    WHERE H.SalesOrderID = @SalesOrderID', N'@SalesOrderID INT', 56000
    GO
    EXEC sp_executesql N'SELECT  SUM(LineTotal) AS LineTotal
    FROM Sales.SalesOrderHeader H
    JOIN Sales.SalesOrderDetail D ON D.SalesOrderID = H.SalesOrderID
    WHERE H.SalesOrderID = @SalesOrderID', N'@SalesOrderID INT', 56005
    GO
    select  stats.execution_count AS exec_count, 
    LEFT([sql].[text], 80) as [plan_text]
    from sys.dm_exec_cached_plans p
    outer apply sys.dm_exec_sql_text (p.plan_handle) sql
    join sys.dm_exec_query_stats stats ON stats.plan_handle = p.plan_handle
    GO
    Best Regards,Uri Dimant SQL Server MVP,
    http://sqlblog.com/blogs/uri_dimant/
    MS SQL optimization: MS SQL Development and Optimization
    MS SQL Consulting:
    Large scale of database and data cleansing
    Remote DBA Services:
    Improves MS SQL Database Performance
    SQL Server Integration Services:
    Business Intelligence

  • Anyone else? CS4 running much slower than CS3?

    I just upgraded to CS4 from CS3. All of the applications are running much, much slower than CS3, particularly InDesign. My computer is literally fresh out of the box; specs below. Software and patches up to date. Thinking of uninstalling CS4 and reverting back to CS3. Any suggestions/feedback?
    MacBook Pro 15"
    2.66GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor
    4GB memory
    320GB 5400-rpm hard drive
    NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT graphics processor with 256MB
    1440 by 900 pixels
    Snow Leopard OX
    Purchased CS4 Master Collection. Other software installed includes iLife, iWork, Office for Mac.

    I'm not using In Design yet, but for Photoshop and Acrobat my sense is that they are fast or faster than CS3, and Snow Leopard has reduced the launch time for all my apps compared with Leopard.
    Yes there are issues with running Adobe apps with Snow Leopard, but some of them are the same issues when running CS3 apps with Leopard--and in any event, these are, I believe, all crashing bugs, not things that slow down responsiveness. I personally have had only a few problems with Design Std CS4 apps + Snow Leopard.

  • CS6 JavaScript Running Much Slower than ActionScript

    Dear All,
    In advance of the next version of InDesign CC, which will only support HTML5 and JavaScript, I converted all of my Extension's business logic from ActionScript to JavaScript - about 20,000 lines of code.
    I am using CS6 to run my Extension, and I call my JavaScript methods from within legacy Flex/ActionScript event-handler code using this methodology:
    [Embed(source="MyJSModule1.jsx", mimeType= "application/octet-stream" )]
    private static var _myJSModule1:Class;
    [Embed(source="MyJSModule2.jsx", mimeType= "application/octet-stream" )]
    private static var _myJSModule2:Class;
    _interface = HostObject.getRoot(HostObject.extensions[0]);
    public static function Initialize()
    _interface.eval(new _myJSModule1.toString());
    _interface.eval(new _myJSModule2.toString());
    _interface.myJSMethod();
    I have found that my InDesign Extension runs about 5 times slower in JavaScript than it did in ActionScript.
    Posts I read on the web seemed to indicate that JS would only be about 30% slower.
    Would the upcoming V8-based and Node.js-supporting environment be any faster?
    I really, really need help with this.
    TIA,
    mlavie

    Hmm,
    at that project/code size you get at plenty points where things matter that would be irrelevant in smaller scripts. A few years ago I extended and re-architectured a similar project, by thorough optimizations we got an speed increase of roughly tenfold, of course partially eaten up by new features.
    For the beginning: rather than issuing 80 evals, for deployment I'd compile such an enormous pile of sources into a single file. For debugging, #include is much more fun.
    As you mention argument passing of large xml, that's one area where ExtendScript can seriously slow down. Besides you'll probably find a size limit of about 64k for the underlying XML. We used InDesign document XML for working data, while smaller configuration data was parsed into js objects as soon as possible. I wrote a JSX abstraction layer that would work on either kind of XML.
    Next problem - number of prototype slots. It definitely makes a difference if you have too much, I partitioned objects into cross-linked clusters, similar to the plugin object model (boss classes), the whole enchilada supported by an underlying framework that generated JSX collections etc. by a few declarations, roughly the equivalent to templates in other languages.
    At least you're using prototypes - one really big issue with ExtendScript is the explosion of object allocations when you apply the typical closure-based JavaScript style from web programming. Eliminating them was a very big effort in our rewrite, but also gave a pretty good improvement. At least ExtendScript can produce allocation statistics, use them. Also use them to find and eliminate circular link object leaks etc. A while ago I wrote a diff utility that extends $.summary(), InDesign Server also has some goodies.
    Have you noticed ESTK's profiler? Unfortunately it just gave up at our code size, probably it will also for yours. Instead I used an own profiler with several additions, e.g. I could apply the profiler selectively to some modules while already optimized modules were skipped. It really helps to know your candidates when management pressures for "quick wins" ... Where is most absolute computation time burnt, or what methods are invoked a couple 10000 times too often for your gut feeling. Again, eliminate dead code and thus reduce prototype/object slot count. When your central class has 100s properties and matching get/set methods, eliminating them one by one produces measurable improvements.
    Of course I also tracked down some offending statements where the same value was assigned over and over again causing severe text recomposition while nothing was actually changed ... You can only find such problems with exact measurements.
    Other areas of fun: under the hood (at C++ level) every temporary text expression is backed by an enormous aggregation "suite", there are many things you can do wrong there. For example these things just pile up and are rarely purged, therefor it has become common wisdom to do an occasional save() for lengthy scripts.
    Again at the XML side: if you do severe document XML (we did), there are some circumstances where text attributes will get lost/ignored. There are ways to speed up expressions underlying references to document XML, and so forth. To know when to rebuild the XML expressions or when they can be reused is a science for itself. Same goes for other objects, as you already mention getElements(). Sometimes it helps, sometimes it is just a waste of execution time.
    As you mention the advantage of SSDs: How frequently do you dump those jsx sources into ExtendScript? If you currently use the "main" session (is that possible for HTML extensions at all?), utilize persistent sessions instead - when you have eliminated your object leaks.
    There are plenty more optimizations, I probably should write a book - to be sold in about 5 copies. Unfortunately the strongest advice in its preface would be to not use ExtendScript/JavaScript at all for large scale projects, because they turn into a maintenance nightmare where other languages catch errors on compile time. Dependent on client preference I'd probably turn to Java or do the whole thing in C++, at increasing code size development speed will be roughly on par.

  • LRCC is running much slower than LR5

    I just upgraded my Lightroom 5.7 stand-alone to Lightroom CC and it is much slower.  I have a good laptop that is less than three years old, with 8GB RAM and a SSD.  What's up?   Thanks in advance!

    Read this: GPU notes for Lightroom CC (2015).

  • My iMac is running much slower how can I speed it up?

    I have an early 2009 iMac 24 inch.  I just ordered a pair of 4 gb ram upgrading to 8 gb from 4. What else can I do to get this thing to go faster? In its old age it's slowed down a bit. Please help.

    Model Name:          iMac
      Model Identifier:          iMac9,1
      Processor Name:          Intel Core 2 Duo
      Processor Speed:          3.06 GHz
      Number of Processors:          1
      Total Number of Cores:          2
      L2 Cache:          6 MB
      Memory:          4 GB
      Bus Speed:          1.07 GHz
      Boot ROM Version:          IM91.008D.B08
      SMC Version (system):          1.45f0
      Serial Number (system):        
      Hardware UUID:        

  • Firefox 4.0 runs much slower than FF 3.x and hangs

    After using FF 3.x for some time, I upgraded to FF 4.0 as soon as it came out. I find that simple things, like switching tabs and reloading pages takes much more time that FF3.x. On many occasions, I've had to cancel FF and restart it. Sometimes this was multiple times a day. The worst part was using Facebook and Farmville (a Flash application). It would hang many time in a session to the point that what took less than an hour took three or more.
    I finally tracked down the FF3.6 DL and reinstalled it and I find that the problem with FF4.0 no longer happens. In fact Farmville does not hang at all.
    The interesting thing is that each version of FF has its own icon and directory, but when I have one open and try the other, a second copy of the version running opens.

    http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Installing+a+previous+version+of+Firefox
    http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-older.html

Maybe you are looking for

  • Download error "source file could not be read" when closing tab.

    So it seems like when I start a download by clicking a link on a website and I close that tab before the download finishes I get a download error and the file stops downloading. I first noticed this on some site and thought it was a problem with the

  • My phone suddenly turned off and won't turn back on.

    My phone went off without warning and I can't get it to turn back on.  Whay would this have happened and how can I fix it?

  • Acrobat XI printing very slow

    Hi, Just upgraded to Acrobat XI v11.0.0.379 from v9 on a Windows 7 x64 system. I find the printing very slow compared to v9. I have a single page text PDF that I print regularly. Under v9, it takes 7-10 seconds to start the print. Under XI, it takes

  • Cache and Load Balancing for Oracle APEX Listener

    Hi, I intend to use only HTTP access. The database I use is Oracle11gR2 SE 32bit. How to implement a Cache and Load Balancing with the Oracle APEX Listener? Is it possible to do with the the standalone running APEX Listener? Thanks by advance for any

  • IPhoto Time machine backup

    Hi, I had my hard drive crash, but had it backed up periodically with time machine.  However, when we installed the new hard drive, my wife logged in with her apple ID (whereas prior to the crash I was logged in with my apple ID) and now all of our p