My Lens Correction Feature Disappeared on my Lightroom/My Sigma 10-20mm Lens is not there

My Lens Correction Feature Disappeared on my Lightroom/My Sigma 10-20mm Lens is not there

The profile is applied automatically. Therefore, nothing for you to.

Similar Messages

  • Lens Correction Feature Not Showing Up

    I have Lightroom 5.3 and the Lens Correction feature is not showing up in the Develop module.  Any suggestions on how to access this feature?
    Thanks,

    Right-click on one of the other section titles (Basic, Tone Curve, Detail, etc) and put a checkmark next to Lens Corrections.

  • Lens correction feature completely missing from Develop Module

    The lens correction feature has gone missing from the Development Module.  It was missing before I upgraded to 5.6 and is still missing.  Previously, it was present, so I am wondering if I did anything to hide or remove it?

    Right-click on one of the other section headings, such as Tone Curve, Basic, etc. Make sure there is a checkmark in lens corrections. This is how you control which develop features you want displayed on your system. Sometimes features disappear mysteriously.

  • Lens Correction Feature

    I have the latest version of Lightroom, 3.4.1.
    Lately, I have been using the Lens Correction feature more and more.
    I have 3 Nikon lenses and one Tamron lens.
    I have noticed that when I check the box to Enable Profile Corrections, it automatically finds the correction if it is one of the 3 Nikon lenses.
    However, if the image was taken using the Tamron lens (28 - 300 mm), LR does not automatically find the profile.  The message is "Unable to locate a matching profile automatically."  When I enter "Tamron" in the Lens Profile Make, then LR automatically finds this particular lens.
    Is there a reason LR finds the profile fully automatically for the Nikon lenses but does not do so for the Tamron lens?  
    Thanks

    I did what I think you are suggesting, and this is what happened.
    I went to a picture taken with that Tamron lens.  I clicked on "Enable Profile Corrections."  At that point, "None" showed in the Make field as well as in the Model and Profile fields.
    I then selected "Tamron" to be in the Make field.  Both the Model and Profile fields then were populated (and, the Model field was populated with the correct 28 -300 mm lens).
    Then under "Setup," I did select "Save New Lens Profile Defaults."
    I went to the next picture and again selected "Enable Profile Corrections."  This time, the Make, Model, and Profile fields were properly populated because that next picture was taken with that 28 - 300 mm Tamron lens.
    However, I skipped a few pictures ahead, to a shot taken with a Nikon lens, and this time when I selected "Enable Profile Corrections," instead of putting the Nikon lens information in those fields, it put the Tamron 28 - 300 mm lens information in those fields.
    It appears as if perhaps I will have to "Save New Lens Profile Defaults" every time I go to a new photo which uses a different lens, unless I am not understanding what you have suggested to do.
    Thanks

  • Tutorials on ACR 6.1 new Lens Correction features

    Hi,
    We are all experienced users of cameras/Photoshop/ACR etc., and wizards at learning by trial-and-error, but I think it might be really helpful if there was a good tutorial (preferably by Adobe), to deal with the new features of lens corrections in ACR 6.1, to take out some of the guesswork.
    There are items to be addressed, like for instance, the difference between Default-Auto-Custom in Lens Profiles page, why the lens profiles seem to depend only on lens type, while in Photoshop they depend on Camera/Lens combinations, how to prevent double correction, and many others.
    If anyone knows of such tutorials, I'll be grateful if they can share.
    Thanks,
    Moshe

    The "Chicken Little" as you call it, isn't aimed at you, unless you want to claim ownership. It isn't mine either. The sky's not falling but there are a few heavy showers about.
    I have taken the time and if you examine what I said, I am including the auto corrections in PhotoMerge as part of the whole. Particularly Photomerge at this point.
    If you have taken the time to read what I said I pointed out that Lens Correction will attempt to correct the image if you ignore the warning that no profile exists. I couldn't know that unless I tested it.
    If you took the time to read my posts earlier in the Profile Creator Forum, would would know that I actually ran tests on the Lens Profiler for the one lens in Adobe's collection I use, against the DXO output and found Adobe's correction way out of line. And to put to rest the notion I don't know what I am talking about, I have used this lens with architectural subjects and the barrel/pincushion distortion is very well corrected with DXO.
    But then you are busy I'm sure and would not necessarily know or remember all that. Strange, you do recall just enough to give you ammunition to insult.
    So bottom line for me is this:
    Lens Correct is set unchecked. I'll look from time to time as more corrections show up, and if I find them satisfactory and at least equivalent to DXO, I'll use it. Why not? It fits the workflow so much better. And I'll come back and share my findings. So Lens Correction in ACR won't affect me.
    Photomerge using Geometric Correction in Auto is a non-starter. I really like it better for some stitches than Reposition, but Reposition in CS3 is better than Reposition in CS5 (or 4) which is why I would go back to it.
    Yes, it is complicated, complex even. What I am doing is simplifying it best I can so I can work at photography, not test and measurement.
    Message was edited by: Hudechrome

  • LR 5.3 Lens Corrections have disappeared

    All of a sudden, nearly all profiles have disappeared. I first noticed this with my Sony RX1, when I went to apply the profile correction, and there was nothing.  Usually the program identified the camera automatically.
    When I looked at old pictures, it was the same, nearly. If I used "custom" then it would give me only Nikon and/or Sony, but only one lens for each camera, not relevant to what I had used to take the photograph.  For some pictures it would recognize the lens, but it would not give me options to change it (if I wanted to).
    This is strange behavior.
    Is there a setting perhaps that I changed inadvertently?
    thanks
    christos

    No, that's not it either. Lens Corrections appears in the right panel, between "Detail" and "Effects".
    It's just that when I click on the "make" under the Lens profile, all I get is Nikon and Sony (and not the other brands I used to see) and under model there is only one lens if I remember correctly...
    This is frustrating, and it will be more so if it turns out that I did something silly!!
    thanks
    christos

  • Icon for hp smart web printing has disappeared. Have rt clicked on tool bar. Customize. not there

    Icon for hp web smart printing has disappeared in firefox. It does appear in IE but I use firefox most of the time. I rt clicked in upper right and chose customize. Icon is not there.

    HP stopped updating Smart Web Printing for Firefox a while ago, it was last compatible with Firefox 3.5 - SWP didn't work with 3.6.

  • Lens Corrections in Bridge. Lens Distortion not in Bridge.

    I can open Bridge without opening Photoshop;
    also, I can edit CR in Bridge without opening
    Photoshop CS4.
    Cmd+R puts images into Raw editing.
    There is a Lens Corrections feature in
    Bridge which has no access to a Lens
    Distortion control in Bridge.
    Opening up several hundred CR's in Photoshop
    halts my productivity immediately.
    Lens Distortion should be one of the very first
    accessible tools in Bridge CR. If it is available
    in Bridge, where is it?
    Next question: Is Lens Distortion available in CS5 Bridge?
    Befuddled.

    Can you clearify a point for me?  I always assumed that there was one ACR and
    it could be acceessed from Bridge or from Photoshop. 
    Hi Curt
    It is correct that there can only be one version of ACR, however both Bridge
    and PS can use them together at the same time. Don't know how but it works
    as long as I can remember and I have no reason to assume it does not so in
    Windows.
    Using the command open in Bridge or double click on thumbs opens the files
    in ACR through Photoshop. Open in Camera Raw or cmd + R opens the files in
    ACR using Bridge.
    Open files using choose with lets you choose all the applications that are
    capable of opening the file. (Raw files have limited options of course -due
    to the need for a Raw converter- but for instance a jpg file has a lot of
    options depending on how many applications you have installed on your
    machine)
    In the Bridge prefs you can also check the option to open Raw files in ACR
    Bridge with double click on a file (by default turned off).
    Another option is to use right click mouse menu on selected files and then
    you can also choose from the above ways to open files.
    There is a but in this, Although you can use them both together they can't
    use the same function in both apps to do it in PS at the same time, you have
    to wait for one task to be finished.
    Hence the small difference in both ACR windows, in PS the 'Open' button
    bottom right is active. Using ACR in Bridge the 'Done' button is active.
    But if you have a big session and start using ACR in PS and make your
    settings in filmstrip mode on multiple files you then can open them in PS.
    This can take some time so meanwhile you can switch to Bridge and start work
    on a new batch applying settings in ACR Bridge. After you have finished this
    session hit done and this applies the new ACR settings to the files in
    Bridge, the thumbs will be update.
    Meanwhile you can switch to PS and finishing the job inhere. Then again go
    to Bridge and open the latest corrected files directly in PS using the shift
    key to bypass the ACR window (you already had the settings applied,
    remember). If you wish you can then again choose a new job in ACR Bridge
    while PS opens the files, and so on and so on.
    Depending on your machine specs this can be done without delay (fast machine
    with enough RAM). You can also choose to save files which will provide you
    with a waiting list that functions in the background. Also now you can use
    the other app to work in.
    Nice, isn't it??
    Only downside is that you won't have an excuse for a coffee break, but as
    they say, You can't have them all...

  • Lens Correction in Lightroom 3 and Photoshop CS4

    I just upgraded to Lightroom 3 and make use of the lens correction feature in the develop module. After doing all my
    adjustments in develop I click ctrl-E to take the photo into Photoshop so  I can tweak Levels. I noticed that the lens correction adjustments do not seem to be recognized by CS4 when the photo opens up.
    Do I have to upgrade to CS5 to get the lens correction adjustments in LR3 recognized or am I doing something wrong. Thanks

    I am using Lightroom 3.4, x64, and Photoshop CS5 (12.0.3 x64) on Win 7 OS.
    I might add that, based upon my situation, limited knowledge & experience, I have a number of images ( aprox 200), taken with the same camera/lens combination, for which I want to take advantage of what seem to me the most useful features of each software package:  in this case, the ability of Lightroom to apply common "development", first in lens correction and, later at the end, miscellaneous common settings; but, in the middle rotation & crop unique to each image.
    Am I missing something, for I would think my situation not uncommon?

  • Sony FE 28-70mm in camera + Lightroom lens correction = double correction or overcorrection?

    Hello,
    I have a Sony A7 with Sony FE 28-70mm kit lens. On the Sony A7, if i select "Shading Compensation" in the camera menu, the camera corrects vignetting in the saved raw file. I have experimented by taking two raw photos, with in camera Shading Compensation turned on and off. I then imported the photos into Lightroom. I then tried turning lens compensation (vignetting) on and off in Lightroom. This confuses me. In the first image (In camera ON and Lightroom correction ON) it looks like vignetting is completely gone. With in camera ON and Lightroom lens correction OFF, there is still clearly remaining vignetting. With in camera OFF and Lightroom ON there is also clearly remaining vignetting
    Can someone tell me what the recommended course of action is? Is the Sony in-camera lens correction worse or better than Lightroom? Neither the in-camera nor Lightroom's correction will correct vignetting completely on their own. Does that mean that the Lightroom correction is supposed to be used in tandem with the in camera correction to achieve full vignetting correction? There is lacking information/documentation of this feature, I have looked at both Sony A7 help guide and Adobes documentation about lens correction without finding any info about this situation.
    Thank you.

    "Shading Compensation" is probably saved as metadata tag in the raw file but the raw file data is not corrected.  This metadata is probably used in the included Sony software to automatically correct the raw for "Shading Compensation" but Lightroom probably does NOT use this data.  You will hopefully get a reply from a Sony user.

  • My Lightroom lens corrections need correcting. Is this normal?

    I have bought myself my 1st DSLR camera (Nikon D3100) as i now want to shoot Raw instead of Jpeg. I've always shot Jpegs in the past with my old cameras. The in-camera Jpegs from my new Nikon don't show any lens distortion. However, when i open the Raw (NEF) files in Lightroom and tick 'enable profile correction' in the Lens corrections section, the distortion correction seems too much and i have to manually adjust it every time.
    The lens profile comes from Lightroom itself (not from other users), & so this doesn't seem quite right to me that the correction is somewhat wrong each time.
    I'm wondering if i'm doing something wrong or that maybe its even normal to have to adjust the correction further yourself each time (and perhaps most users have to do that too)?
    I've included 3 Jpegs of the same image to demonstrate the problem (detailed below):
    1) The export from Lightroom with the lens distortion corrected by Lightroom (note the straight red line).
    2) An exported Jpeg version of the uncorrected Nef from Lightroom  (to show the full original lens distortion)
    3) The original in-camera Jpeg (obviously the distortion corrected by the camera)
    I've  drawn straight red lines on to the images to demonstrate the differences.
    Any ideas?
    ^ above image is a Lightroom exported Jpeg (from NEF) with lens correction ON (note the red line along the top of the roof)
    ^ above image is a Lightroom exported Jpeg (from NEF) with NO lens correction yet, thus showing original distortion.
    ^ above image is the ORIGINAL in-camera JPEG showing no distortion at all (note the red line along the top of the roof).
    P.s i've taken different shots too and the problem is the same for them all (at least at 18mm anyway).
    Additional information:
    The Nikon D3100 has an APS-C sensor (I'm not sure if that's significant or not). Also the lens described in the profile correction matches the one from my camera.

    Rob Cole wrote:
    Hi Paul,
    I'm really not sure exactly what DxO outputs when you choose DNG:
    It's not raw data, yet preserves some ability to do raw things in Lightroom, like white balance and camera profiles.
    I dunno about pulling from highlight/shadow "reserves", but note: it's different than a DNG-wrapped tif or jpeg, it may be able to pull from the highlight/shadow reserves as can be done via the DNG used for smart previews - I just don't know.
    trshaner: do you know for sure that a DxO DNG hard-clips shadows/highlights, or are you just "extrapolating/assuming/educatedly-guessing"?
    Regardless, DxO has some auto shadow/highlight recovery (for those extreme black/white tones) that is quite good - don't sell it short.
    Google 'dxo linear dng highlights.' Here's one that supports what I said:
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/663428
    I've tried using Canon's DPP for the same purpose with TIFF output AND with DPP's highlight recovery. I can't get the same highlight recovery with the TIFF as compared to the raw inside LR with PV2012.
    Rob Cole wrote:
    I still think about it when Lr's lens corrections are wonky. But my problem with Lr's lens corrections have more to do with vignetting than distortion (because I mostly shoot nature, not buildings...), and I can add manual correction and/or a dab of paint to the automatic corrections, which saves me the complication of front-ending via DxO. If distortion is your primary concern, consider balancing auto with manual distortion corrections (I've not done much of that, so no guarantee...). Also, there's the upright feature in Lr5...
    What's wrong with simply changing the Lens Profile 'Amount' settings from 100 if a specific lens profiles is "over-correcting" or "under-correcting? Don't forget most zoom lenses have a "complex" moustache shaped distortion, which is NOT easily corrected with LR's Manual Distortion control. You can certainly try both, but there's no way to save the Manual Distortion "correction" setting to a specific lens profile's defaults.
    Rob Cole wrote:
    PPS - DxO's purple fringe tool will get the fringe out without the artifacts of Lr's global defringer, however it may also take away real image color sometimes, and can't be done locally, so one may ultimately get better results in Lr if willing to spend a while painting local defringing.
    I've never seen any artifacts caused by the LR Defringe tools (see image posted of Canon 8-15mm Fisheye lens CA), but you do need to be very careful concerning the actually settings used. After using the eyedropper tool to sample a fringe area I fine tune the settings to eliminate desaturation of areas that have similar color as the fringe area. Once you have the correct settings save it to a Develop preset for manual application. For example with my Canon 8-15mm F4L Fisheye zoom I have two (2) Develop presets of 8-12mm (Purple 2, 30/55) and 13-15mm (Purple 4, 30/55). There is no need to use Local controls with Defringe if you follow my suggestions for manually tuning the settings to prevent desaturation in like colored areas. IMHO the LR CA and Defringe tools are darn near perfect when you use them correctly!

  • Lens correction Lightroom vs DxO Viewpoint

    Does anyone know if Lightroom's lens correction is any better than that of Viewpoint 2 (or 2.5)?  I am trying to decide whether I need Viewpoint to do lens correction on my Sony a5100 with the 16-50 kit lens.  The lens produces a lot of barreling distortion especially at wide angle.  Is viewpoint necessary or will the lens correction in Lightroom 5.7 do the job adequately.  Both software programs support the camera and lens combination.  Thanks.

    It's best to download Lightroom and try it for yourself.
    You can use it free for 30 days from the date of download.
    https://www.adobe.com/uk/products/photoshop-lightroom.html

  • Lightroom 5.7.1 Lens Corrections chooses wrong lens info from EXIF when I 'Enable Profile Corrections'. Windows 7

    When I enable lens corrections on a jpg image it brings up the wrong lens info. If I try to change it there are only 2 lenses listed—neither one is correct. It lists a 50mm lens even though in the Histogram just above it says 18mm. I then tried the original DNG image & it chooses the correct lens automatically. Both the jpg & DNG image EXIF info show an 18mm lens, which is correct, but Lr doesn't read the jpg info correctly. The problem is the same on all the images I've tried so far.

    Most Adobe-supplied lens profiles are for raw files only.  Since there are very few JPG lens profiles LR is probably just choosing the closest one it has which isn’t anywhere close to the right lens.
    The reason raw and jpgs have separate lens profiles is because cameras apply lens corrections when they produce JPGs and it would be inappropriate for LR to apply a lens profile when the camera already has, so LR refrains.  If you are sure that your camera has not applied any corrections then you can hack a raw lens profile into a jpg lens profile by text-editing a copy of the .lcp file that comes with LR, and changing the raw designation from true to false inside the file for each profile segment, then move this edited copy to the users profile area.  You might also find the JPG version of the profile using the Adobe Lens Profile Downloader available via a search at adobe.com.

  • Adobe Camera Raw - lens correction profiles not found

    I use Photoshop CC as part of the photography program of Creative Cloud. My platform is a Mac Book Pro (2013) with the latest Mac OS-X operating system. I have also installed Bridge CC and Lightroom 5.
    Since about three weeks (maybe after an update but I'm not sure on that) Adobe Camera Raw's lens correction feature fails permanently. With older pictures (taken long before the error occured for the first time) as well as with new photos and with dng files as well as with cr2 files the ACR dialog always shows the error message (lens correction profile can't be found - since I have the German version of Photoshop this is how I would translate the error message). I didn't install or uninstall any programs, plugins etc. around the time of the first occurance of the error.
    I already uninstalled Photoshop CC completely (using the uninstall function in the programs folder) and reinstalled it via Creative Cloud but it still shows the same error.
    What can I do?

    Hello, you can make sure the latest version is installed by going to help-updates.
    Also, make sure that you are running the latest version of the creative cloud application, as it fixes a permission problem that might cause the issue you are facing. Just go to the creative cloud application on your menu bar, and restart it.

  • Fujifilm s5 - lens correction - LR thinks S5 is fullframe

    Hey,
    This more a bug-report than a question. I've been using the lens correction feature with my nikon d50. This summer I bought a used fujifilm s5 and found out that the lenscorrection does odd things. If I use the (aps-c) sigma 18-50 2.8 lens on the d50, the correction is fin, but when I mount the lens on my s5 and import the .raf to lightroom and try to apply correction, it overcorrectlies the picture. The edges around the middle go to pure white, much as you would expect the software to behave on a fullframe camera. Also, when I try to correct the fisheye perspective from my nikkor 10.5mm i don't get the correct result when i select that lens, I do get it (with some minimal distortion present) when i select the nikkor 16mm (fullframe) lens.
    So: Lightroom 3 think the fujifilm s5 pro is a full frame camera. Where can I report this bug?
    edit: found the bug report feature.

    i've found the bug report form

Maybe you are looking for

  • Use of open interface tables in R12

    Hello, Can someone tell me the status of using open interface tables in release 12. Is this still a supported mechanism for importing data into the product, or must you use a PL/SQL/Java API, XML gateway etc? iREP for 11.5.10 lists these open interfa

  • Price and quantity variance

    Hi guru's,                      Can any body explain how to find out price variance and quantity variance?thanx in advance

  • Calling web service request from PL/SQL

    I am trying to create Apex page with stock quote ticker - like what Yahoo has on their page. I have the right web service and have put together a page which works when you submit (created by the wizard). Instead of clicking submit to refresh the page

  • CERTIFICATION HELP NEEDED

    HI , I an Interested in get Oracle certification i have my Oracle 8i knowledge and is interested in getting Oracle 9i certification Developer level can any body tell me how may paper it contains and can provide me link with contain the details for th

  • List command.

    I want to know if it is possible to re-direct the output of the list command in rman to an external file. reason beeing that in rman, when ai issue the command rman> list backup summary, I get a hell of infos (as mai db is arround 1.2T and we have ap