N8 ARM 11 680 MHz Single CPU???? really

i have a n8 with ARM 11 680 MHz Single CPU, but i have installed x-plorer and i fond that the n8 have CPU speed :192Mhz
can someone explain why n8 have just 192mhz speed???
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Well the speed specified is 680MHZ but it is underclocked right ? That is what I want to know is it underclocked to 192MHZ ????
If not to what frequency is it undercooked ????
JBENCHMARK ACE is not giving the running processor speed ? phonenetinfo will just tell the speed specified on the chip but what is the actual speed N8 is runnin at this moment ?

Similar Messages

PSE 10 both Organizer and Editor crash on multi-core hardware; set affinity to single cpu mode fixes

As I have noted in thread http://forums.adobe.com/thread/941128 I have found that both the editor and the organizer for PSE 10 crash in a multi core environment, I am running WIndows 64 bit, latest updates (includes sp1), I had the same problems with Windows 7 32 bit.
Solution is to set the affinity to a single cpu. From the task manager, select the 'processes' tab, find the exe (eg PhotoshopElementsOrganizer), right-click, select 'Set affinity...' and reduce the number of CPUs selected (checked) to exactly one. (Under different versions of Windows the exact means for doing this varies, but the essential steps are the same). It doesn't matter which cpu you select, but if you do both the Editor and the Organizer, put them on different CPUs.
Given that pretty well all hardware these days is multi-core, my assumption is that Adobe test in a virtualized environment and so do not discover this type of unreliabillity. Adobe really do need to test their software more thoroughly as the exact same problem existed in PSE 6, so it is hardly new to them.

The solution is in the above.
Should Adobe read this, they should take note that a virtualized environment does not provide a decent fidelity emulation of multi-core CPU systems. The ONLY way to test the reliability of an application is on REAL hardware.

Can I add a 1.8 GHZ Dual Proc to a G4 Quicksilver 733 MHZ Single Proc comp?

I just acquired a G4 Quicksilver 733 MHZ Single Processor/120 MB SDRAM Model Number: M8493
Can I add a SG4D-1800L 1.8 GHz DUAL Processor to a G4 Quicksilver 733 MHZ Single Processor/120 MB SDRAM?

Dear TGH
Adding a dual 1.8 GHz processor will significantly reduce task times, obviously those that are processor intensive. I have just added the dual 1.8 GHz processor to my (former) 733 Mz Quicksilver G4. I also added a faster harddrive and more memory, but it was the Processor that really made the difference.
I do some music conversion, vinyl to MP3, and some of the software processes for cleaning up the music were quite time consuming with the 733, anywhere from 3 to 15 minutes per run. These have been reduced to 30s to two or three minutes, so a five-fold speed gain.
Overall, the whole computing experience has benefitted from the upgrades, the multi-tasking and leaping from program to program is crisp and speedy.
Putting in the Sonnet software was a real exercise; I seems for some it is straightforward and for others it is problematic; it is a fragile process. Here are the highlights of my experience....
*OS9* - You need to boot up in OS 9 at least from one disk in your computer. I had an old OS 9 system disc still in the hard drive, but I could not boot up successfully. The OS 9 startup kept freezing. I begged and borrowed OS9 install discs but none of them worked either.
The solution for me was to copy the OS 9 system folder to another hard drive in my computer, that was blank and did not have OS X already one. It was a clean hard drive that I partitioned for a small OS 9 boot disc, and the rest will be a place to keep various projects. From the "clean" disc there was no problem booting up into OS 9.
You need OS 9 for installing the special software that Sonnet provides on a CD. It doesn't matter if the OS 9 disc is separate from your OS X disc and programs, in fact for me it was preferable.
*Installing the Sonnet software*
You start your system up in OS 9 and run the installation disc from Sonnet. At least that's the theory. First you have to figure out how to make your keyboard work in OS 9. I had to unload drivers off the internet. Then I could open folders and click on buttons as necessary. When I first ran the installation CD it crashed. The old "bomb" box showed up and everything froze. Again and again.
You need to look at each of your PCI cards, and video card, and either move them or update their drivers and firmware. I installed drivers or firmware for both OS 9 and OS X where I could.
Eventually the planets lined up right and the Sonnet CD software downloaded and ran.
The second part of the Sonnet install is restarting your computer and using the programmer button
(the teeny tiny button on the front of my G4) during restart to trigger the firmware revisions. *The Instructions in the book from Sonnet are not right for all Quicksilver G4s.*
The Instructions say to hold the programmer button down while pressing and releasing the power button for startup. Once you hear a "tone" you release the programmer button. For my Quicksilver (which I think is the 2002), you have to hold both buttons down until you hear the tone.
There is no mistaking when you do it right. The tone is heard, a progress bar comes up on the screen, and then after normal startup a dialogue box tells you that the patch to the firmware is in, or it is not. If it isn't then try again. Once I figured out how to do it right, I only had to do it once. Don't be fooled by the Sonnet extension that loads in OS 9 startup, it doesn't mean you necessarily patched the firmware right. You have to hear the tone, see the progress bar and read the message after restart.
Then you can restart in OS X and run that updater available from the Sonnet website (Encore Firmware Updater Installer v.3.1). It is an OS X program, not OS 9. I ran it and it told me all was well that the patch was as it should be. I have read of others who thought it was necessary to runs the program.
*Installing the Processor*
Installing the processor is a piece of cake, especially after suffering through OS9 startup failures, balking mice, installer crashes and firmware fixes that didn't take. You need a screw driver and your eyeglasses. It takes minutes.
So Good Luck, and enjoy the project. I thought it was worthwhile, though I would sure like to see a different process for jigging up the firmware.

Apple RAID card II - will it work in single CPU Mac Pro 4,1?

Will the Apple RAID card work in a quad core 2009 Mac Pro? I'm refurbing a used Mac Pro I got at a great price and just wondering if I can put in this card (which was "thrown in" with a used 8 core I also bought) with the idea of doing a RAID 10 to experiment with getting top disk read/write performance. I know most do not like the Apple RAID card II but it might be a cost effective way to max out performance on the single CPU, quad core Mac Pro. Ultimately I want to falsh the firmware to 5,1 and upgrade the CPU to a W3690 hex core. I plan to use this box for photography, light video and possibly sound editing. If my plan will result in high benchmarks and provide some fault tolerance I'm comfortable with using the card. I have heard from other users that the new card is much better than the first version and that it actually works pretty well. Any insights appreciated.

Heck!
Im about to win an eBay auction for a blue Apple RAID card together with a pair or SAS 300gb cheetah 15.5k discs for 75 bucks *happy*. Would have been healthy fast upgrade for small investment I thought?!
Guess it probably would have been if the thing worked!?
Why doesnt it work? iPass cable or something like that?
Suppose I still want to go the SAS route with those drives for performance. Any other cards not too expensive that will enable SAS in the Pro?
I use my MP 4,1 as a photo edit workstation but I also keep it on 24/7 for home server, web server, nas, backup etc. So i like to use items that are made for round the clock usage.
Or i just get inexpensive SATA drives and SoftRAID them. So RAID 0+1 is no problem in software RAID?
Thank you guy for quick informed response

FDS Express Single CPU limitation

Could somebody go in to a bit more detail about the FDS
Express single CPU limitation? What I'd like to know is whether the
definition of "a single CPU" refers to the number of processors, or
the number of cores? If I get a machine with dual-core processor
for our production environment, is this in violation of the
license? Also, I'm currently using a Core 2 Duo MacBook Pro for my
development machine and I haven't seen or received any
complaints/errors, so I just wanted to make sure. Thanks.
Evan

I guess there's something to be said for thoroughly reading
up on something before you ask any questions, like
reading
the FAQ.

Where can I find mounting rail hardware for single CPU G4 Xserve?

I am wanting to mount my G4 single CPU 1 GHz in a four post rack now where I have a new G5 (keep them all together). I however cannot find the rest of the hardware for it that I got when I bought it several years ago, all I have are the dog ears that I used to mount it in a telco rack.
I've looked on eBay, and a few other places. Surely this is available somewhere? I hope?
Thanks...

There is no such published reference guide. The closest thing would be the global price list but it's generally not distributed. (What Jouni mentioned was probably an extract of that very large document.)
Due to the broad range of products (and associated bundles and services), Cisco uses online configuration and ordering tools (Cisco Commerce Workspace or CCW) internally and with its partners. The information in it is very dynamic and can change day to day as the tens of thousands of products Cisco offers are introduced, deprecated (i.e., Approaching or at End of Sales), offered in different promotional bundles, etc.
When a Cisco salesperson or partner solution advisor talks with a customer, they take the customer's input and build equipment, software and services configuration sets supporting the proposal. CCW will validate the required items are ordered and generate a configuration set that has not only the product IDs (PIDs, generally referred to as SKUs or Stock Keeping Units in this context) but also the plain language descriptions of what each PID means.
They should be conveying that information to you (or any customer they are engaged with) to enable you to make the informed decision you mention.

Restrict weblogic server process to single CPU

Hi,
Can anyone tell me how to restrict a weblogic server instance to a single CPU
on a multiple CPU Windows 2000 box.
Also if this is possible can I have two weblogic server instances which run parallel
on a two CPU Windows 2000 box.
Thanks,
Bhushan Kowshik

If you want a process on Windows to only use a subset of the available CPUs
you can use Task Manager to set the affinity. Right click on a process (in
your case java.exe) and choose "Set Affinity...".
Regards,
/Staffan
"Bhushan Kowshik" <[email protected]> skrev i meddelandet
news:3de6161b$[email protected]..
>
Hi,
Can anyone tell me how to restrict a weblogic server instance to a singleCPU
on a multiple CPU Windows 2000 box.
Also if this is possible can I have two weblogic server instances whichrun parallel
on a two CPU Windows 2000 box.
Thanks,
Bhushan Kowshik

I have downloaded adobe LiveCycle ES2 trail version. Does this mean single cpu license version?

Hi, I downloaded adobe LiveCycle ES2 trail version. I need single cpu license. How could i get that one??

Acrobat XI is not distributed with Designer. Designer is now a separate product. You can create forms in Acrobat as an AcroForm or using Forms Central (an online forms program). You can print the form to a new PDF and then recreate the fields in Acrobat using the recognize form fields. You will likely have to fix the form fields, but that would be the process. Generally, once a form is taken to Designer, you can't bring it back without such steps.
Designer is available with AA8 - AAX, but since is a separate product as I indicated.

Does msi 850e max can work with 533 mhz Prescott cpu?

Hi
I am using msi 850emax mainboard with 533 mhz p4 2.8 cpu without ht.
I want to buy a 533 mhz Prescott cpu with ht.
Can it work on msi 850 e max mainboard?
Thanks
Magicboy

http://www.msi.com.tw/program/products/mainboard/mbd/pro_mbd_cpu_support_detail.php?UID=345
nope

Partition fails when entity manager and DBResourceMgr kept together on single CPU Sparc box

We have this situation where we create partitons with the DBResourceMgr (user-visible and session-dialogued)and its consumer EntityManager together in one partition, as recommended by Forte Design pattern for Database Resource Managers. This partition fails to startup on a Single CPU Sparc box whereas starts fine on a Double CPU Sparc box !! Any clue ?

The error you are getting is the one you get on the client when this process fails, right? You should be able to see the real problem in the log of the partition that you called (the one where DBMgrProxy lives in) - that should be on the server. The real clue is that very bizarre "This usually means the process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and find out why." (:).

Aperture only using single CPU

Hi,
I've noticed when working with Aperture that it will max out either one or the other CPU on my machine, it never seems to use two at a time. This creates a problem for me, as every time one of the CPUs hits max, I get SBOD for 10 or so seconds. Opening properties on smart folder that contains no pictures takes about 30 seconds, etc, all running on single CPU as opposed to two. I have Dual 2GHz G5 (the model with PCI-X slots), 3gb ram (1.7gb free with aperture running) and ATI Radeon 9600. I know the GPU could be better, but I don't see how this would affect the CPU problem.
Does anyone else see this happen on their machine or is something screwy with my box? If yes, I'm going to submit a bugreport ...
thanks,
mayo

OK, I think this is a bug in Aperture. This is approximately how it goes ...
When I do stacking/deleting in Library > All Images (about 3500 images) after import (even if I quit and re-open Aperture many times) Aperture takes long time to do the stacks or deletes and also shows some other problems. Only one CPU would get maxed out and I get BSOD all the time.
One of the other problems I've mentioned is that the moment a stack is made or a image in a stack is promoted or demoted the stack gets moved to the bottom of the image list and subsequently moved back in place. My view is scrolled all the way to the bottom as well, and the scroll bar returns to the original location, however my view doesn't return back to the top.
Now, I've selected all images in Library > All Images and made a album out of it. In this album, I can do stacking deleting without maxing out the CPU ... It will use both CPUs and low usage (30 or so %) and the stack creation is almost immediate. Interesting, I thought, so I went back to Library > All Images and tried the same, it behaved the same way as in the album I just created. It was snappy, no view moving (as I've described above). I deleted the album, quit Aperture, all is fine and other things are quite faster as well.
I've managed to replicate this by creating new Libraries and import the data the same way I initially imported images from iPhoto. (I did my initial import from iPhoto). Does anyone else care to experiment? If no I'm going to report it to BugReport.

ESATA Card for 1.8GHz Single CPU (Late 2004) Power Mac G5 Tower

I have an unusual issue. I purchased the LaCie d2 quadra 500GB external hard drive. What attracted me to this drive is the ability to interface it by USB 2.0, Firewire 400, Firewire 800 or eSATA. Of course, eSATA looks like it would provide the best throughput. So, I asked the rep at MacMall to suggest a compatible eSATA card for my machine. He suggested LaCie part number 710372 which is a PCI card with two eSATA ports on it.
When it arrived, I checked the specs on the package and found that it requires a "PCI slot (32 bits 66Mhz; PCI 2.3 compliant interface)". When I checked Apple's web site it looks like my machine has the following caution "Warning: Do not use PCI cards that function only at 66 MHz in the 33 Mhz PCI slots. Damage to your equipment could result...". So, I called LaCie support to check this before I installed the card. LaCie support checked with their technicians and I was finally told that this card did have the ability to operate at 33 Mhz but it wasn't listed on the package.
So, I installed the card and then brought my machine up. It seemed to run normally. So, I attached the eSATA cable to the hard drive and then to one of the ports on the card. So far, so good. Then, I powered the drive up and it appeared on the desktop. I then fired up Disk Utility and erased the drive. That worked fine. Next, I tried to copy files to it and that worked.
As a matter of course, I always like to erase a new drive with the "write zeros to all sectors". This verifies that every sector on the drive can be written to without any problems. I don't know if this really accomplishes anything. But, it would seem to validate that the drive works fine.
So, I started this process knowing that it would take a long time for a drive this large (500 GB). This seemed to proceed normally as I checked it from time to time. But, after a number of hours (with only 13 minutes remaining), the entire system hung. I could not do anything except press the button on the front of the machine.
After the machine came back up, it seemed to run normally. But, as I started running applications, I could tell all was not well. The system hung from time to time. Each time, it took 10 or 15 minutes to become responsive.
Finally, I got disgusted and powered everything down and removed the suspect PCI card. Since I did that, the machine works fine.
The drive is now connected using the Firewire 800 cable and seems to work fine. But, it doesn't seem especially fast. I have other drives attached using Firewire 400. Is it possible to have drives attached to both Firewire busses and still get the performance advertised by Firewire 800?
Also, is there an eSATA card that will work in my machine and still provide the advertised eSATA performance (1.5Gbits per second/150MB/second)?
With the drive connected to the Firewire 800 port, it honestly doesn't seem any faster than any of the other Firewire 400 drives.

I didn't say what to do, only options and tried to point out WHY.
This is what I know, these are possible explanations. And alternatives.
most PCI cards are NOT a fixed 66MHz, very very small market. And most PCI slots are not 66MHz only. The Blue G3 and Xserve have used 66MHz PCI.
Your card should work. eSATA is slightly better than FW800. But you are going through a 'bridge' between the drive and the PCI card, usually Oxford 924 chipset.
A direct SATA case for $68 would let you use two drives and get the 75MB/sec writing speed, which is about as much as you can expect from most SATA drives and in G5 anyway.
http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Other%20World%20Computing/MESATATBEK/
And here is a nice 500GB drive for $99
http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Maxtor/7H500F0/
Connect it to one of the eSATA ports on your LaCie SATA PCI card.
And yes, you have the single drive now.
When installing cards and drives, reset-nvram - either zap the pram from cold startup or boot into Open Firmware and type the reset-nvram and reset-all from there.
I know lots of people use and are happy with LaCie and D2. I am not one of them (I use to buy LaCie when it was Quantum back in early 90s).

KT7 Pro MS6330 V1.4(?) 750-1200 Mhz Athlon cpu upgrade worth it?

Hi
I’m not experienced at any modifications except adding RAM!
I have looked at the discussions in the “Retired Intel/AMD” forum and am beginning to have second thoughts about all this but just wanted a definitive answer from the experts please!
I have a K7T Pro MS6330 board with BIOS version 1.4, (is that reeeally old?) according to the bootup screen and a AMD Athlon 750Mhz processor. I haven’t yet looked at which board version I have…. The manual says an upgrade “to 900Mhz or above”.
Having checked the AMD & MSI’s sites I believe can upgrade the CPU to a Athlon 1.2Ghz providing the board has a v1.6 or later BIOS. So far so good. I’m not sure which bios update I should use. Can I use the latest version available i.e version 3.6 or only version 1.6 ?. Apart from a new fan/cooler will I need a different power supply? What else might I need to install?
If I shouldn’t tackle all this what would be the highest rated Athlon I could use with the current BIOS? If it’s say a 950 Mhz & fan (but no PSU change ) would it really be worth it for an extra 150Mhz? The system’s used for word processing, surfing, some gaming but not much else. I really wanted to upgrade before the motherboard’s too old.
I’m also concerned about the warning: “It is risky to update BIOS manually. We don't recommend the beginner-users to do so”
Any advice gratefully received!
Thanks for your time
H

http://www.msi.com.tw/program/support/cpu_support/cpu/spt_cpu_detail.php?UID=97%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20&NAME=MS-6330
are cpu you can use
3.5 was last actually relevant to your board bits in 3.6 will never effect you
follow directions and you will be fine
if using ntfs on drives get none fat 32 method
http://www.msi.com.tw/program/support/bios/bos/spt_bos_detail.php?UID=97%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20&NAME=MS-6330
http://www.msi.com.tw/program/support/bios/bos/spt_bos_detail.php?UID=97%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20&NAME=MS-6330

Upgrading from single CPU to dual ?

Hey,
With the multi-threaded OpenGL enabled by leopard on powerPC macs i was thinking of replacing the single 1.25 GHz CPU with a stock dual 1.25 GHz to improve performance in World of Warcraft. Any idea what if any i would gain in performance ?
Getting a mac pro is around 2 years off for me and i could pick up a dual CPU for a relatively cheap price.
Thanks

OK, I did a quick check of a technical manual.
You need to check the fabrication number on the logic board.
It's right next to the SLOT 5 PCI slot, the one farthest from the RAM slots.
It'll be of the format APPLE COMPUTER INC. 820-1308-A or similar number.
If it's 820-1308, 820-1440, or 820-1445, you can't just replace the CPU, there's a compatability issue between those logic boards and replacement CPU's (unless the CPU comes from a logic board with one of those fabrication levels. Apple recommends ordering a replacement logic board, CPU (part number 661-3654).
Otherwise you should be fine, although I'm concerned about taking a dual CPU from an MDD that pre-dates your single 1.25GHz G4 by a whole year.
When you get to dual CPU there may be some updates that need to be applied, I'm remembering a fix that disables one CPU on shutdown since having two active caused clock issues. Could have been part of a general OSX fix though.

Rendering Required Files pins single CPU core

A feature request has been submitted. I'm posting to forum so to show screen-cap of unbalanced CPU load. With CC 7.1.0 it can sit like this for an hour. Better than CS6, it used to take a full day.
Happens when switching to a not-recently-played sequence. Please parallelize it to use multiple cores, so I don't have to wait as long.
This is important because it is still one of the biggest bottlenecks. I have a very fast system. 64GB RAM. Lots of cache space on drives. I can't throw money at this problem, only Adobe can solve it.
Am posting this right now becuase... I'm waiting on PPro. Guess it is the best use of my time?

PPro preforms really well for me (generally). This is the moment when PPro is presumeably rendering audio? Next time it comes up I'll just try copying the sequence and deleting all the video content from the sequence leaving audio.
I don't think it is an effect. Just something to do with having audio ready to play when I hit spacebar. But I'll confirm this by purging the video component.

N8 ARM 11 680 MHz Single CPU???? really

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for