N8 email client performance issue

The email client on the N8 mostly works OK, but the performance is terrible when trying to reply to an email that is "long". Actually there really doesn't have to be that much text in the previous message(s) when the client starts to be really really slow. When typing, the lag is really making the typing almost impossible.
Is there plans to improve the performance? Will the Anna update improve the client? N8 isn't the best hardware out there, but still it has plenty of power to handle large emails also. This can be lightly tested using some webmail with the phones browser. When typing a reply to a long email there is no problem.
Others having performance issues when trying to reply to a long email?

Same here, not only answering large emails, sending email with attachments is about the same. I am having sync problems too, Messaging looks erratic.

Similar Messages

Email Client Missing Issue in Reader XI

Whenever I open a document in Reader (both X and XI) I get the email client missing error message window which I have to then close. I googled this error and have looked in the Adobe questions for this. What little I found was of no help. I don't use an email client (in use gmail) and I don't want any email being used for Reader. When I go to Edit/Preferences/email accounts I find that I can add an email address, etc.; but I can't delete the Outlook email item as when I select it the 'delete' box is greyed out ... so unavailable. My question is this: How do I stop the email client error message from appearing?
Thanks in advance for your assistance!

In Preferences | Email Accounts, specify a Webmail / Gmail address and make it the default.

Email Client Super Issues

I need to get some help on a problem. I was in the process of moving a Groupwise account from one PO to another. The move looked like it went supre smooth...too smooth.
When the user opened their email, all email was gone. Folder structure is all still there, but no emails.
Hope somebody can give me some ideas on this one!
Thanks in advance!!

On 3/14/2012 2:36 PM, sarsippius wrote:
>
> I need to get some help on a problem. I was in the process of moving a
> Groupwise account from one PO to another. The move looked like it went
> supre smooth...too smooth.
>
> When the user opened their email, all email was gone. Folder structure
> is all still there, but no emails.
>
> Hope somebody can give me some ideas on this one!
>
> Thanks in advance!!
>
>
umm simply logging in from another computer (in client/server mode which
I assume) cannot cause this.
did you move the ARCHIVE? is that what you are referrin to?

Performance issue in KM as a WebDAV client

Hi all,
I have configured KM as a WebDAV client.But there is a performance issue.Whenever i try accessing the folder,its been cached.
Can some suggest how to avoid caching of data everytime.
I am using a memory cache.
thanx and regards,
anuradha

Hi Anuradha,
well, it is intended that the data is being cached...
What is wrong with caching in your scenario?
What are the settings for your WebDAV-RM in KM (especially "Cache Timeout")?
And what are the settings for your memory cache ("Default Time-to-life" and "Restart lifetime on access")?
Best regards,
Paul

Email client issue Symbian Belle

Hello everyone.
I just installed Symbian Belle in my nokia N8, and configured the email client with my Gmail account. I'm getting a strange error when I try to read any message of my inbox. Every time that I try to read a message, all that I can see is a white screen.
Do you guys know what is the solution of that? or another email client to use?
Thanks a lot!

Hi Eb@Lot84,
Please let me know what exactly is the error that comes.
Regards,
Anubha

Default email client issue using thunderbird to share documents

Get an error message when using Thunderbird as a default email client. Works fine is Mac Email client is the designated default.

Hi Eb@Lot84,
Please let me know what exactly is the error that comes.
Regards,
Anubha

Business Catalyst email clients forgot password

Client using Business Catalyst as CMS and email client DNS was moved, then when email access to the former Business Catalyst mail (mail.hostedemail.com) was not available DNS was reverted back.
We need to determine if the following process steps are correct
1) A recovery email needs to be sent from the Business Catalyst CMS
with the DNS records and CNAME records INTACT reverted back to Business Catalyst CMS and mail
2) That password will be used to log in https://mail.hostedemail.com/?_task=login
3) Mail migration and archive can begin. Username password resets will be performed for
each user.
Question: Archive (mail up to the DNS and MX change of a day ago) mail is still on the server (worldsecuresystems.com) hostedemail.com

Hi Cornelius
When DNS was removed from the BC Site Admin, if the MX record was deleted then the e-mails (the entire mail account) were deleted from OpenSRS (our email provider). When the DNS was re-added, the account at SRS was re-created, but from scratch. So what needs to happen here in order to recover lost e-mail is to have this issue raised to our provider. What I'll kindly ask you to do is raise a ticket with our Support Channel, and we'll pick up from there.
Kind Regards,
Alex

Oracle 10.2.0.3 performance issue

Hi all,
I have a performance issue in the database I currently maintain.
Here's the specifications:
- Windows 2003 Server 64bit
- Oracle 10g 10.2.0.3 patch 31
- Application Server 10gR2 OC4J (Forms and Report Services)
The server was re-installed about 3 weeks ago after it got viruses.
I believe my setup on the memory parameters were fine because for two weeks the system ran fine and the end of day process is also increasing in terms of time.
However, starting 2 days ago in the middle of no where, the end of day process started to get really slow (from 11 minutes became 1 hour).
The IT standby in my client will normally do an analyze schema and after that every thing will be back to normal again.
I turned off the GATHER_STATS_JOB 2 weeks ago and replaced it with DBMS_STATS.GATHER_DATABASE_STATS which I scheduled to execute every Friday.
This problem occurred even before the server was re-installed and as usual, analyze schema (GATHER_SCHEMA_STATS) will fix it.
I don't have much options currently, and analyzing the schema seems to be the only solution which normally we never do for other clients (at not everyday analyzing schema).
I hope any of you could help me out with any solution on how to trace the exact problem on this.
Thank you,
Adhika

Hi Satish,
This end of day process basically will insert some values to certain tables and also generating reports afterward.
I managed to get the AWR report within the time of the end of day process.
sql execute elapsed time is on the top of Time Model Statistics.
What I don't understand here is why is this issue happened only after 2 weeks?
I suspected that this might be because Oracle pick the wrong execution plan, and normally a wrong execution plan caused by outdated statistics on the indexes and tables, but what I cannot understand is why this is happening on Monday morning where in Friday night GATHER_DATABASE_STATS ran successfully.
Yesterday when the analyze schema was executed again, this morning I got another email saying that the performance issue occurred again.
The top most wait events are: db file sequential read, db file scattered read, log file parallel write, LNS Wait on SENDREQ, and log file sequential read.
Thank you,
Adhika

Default email client install?

New Toshiba Satellite laptop, Windows 7, Comcast service provider. When I click on the mail icon on the toolbar, I get a message that "Windows Internet Explorer could not perform this operation because the default mail client is not properly installed."   Sometimes I also get this message on a webpage when I click on the "contact us" button provided there.   How can I correct this problem?

Your getting that msg since you dont have a default client email setup. I got the same issue since i only have yahoo & gmail accounts which are web based.
You can set up either one of those as your default email client.
   How can I make Yahoo! Mail my default email application
   Making Gmail your default mail application
-Jerry

E71 Nokia Email client not registering other accou...

I am using nokia E71. i ran the email setup wizard, using nokia email client i have configured it for my hotmail accounty. and then from some reason i have removed it. now when i am setting up the same email id using the nokia email client its always saying " that email is already registered with another nokia messaging account". and when i goto the email.nokia.com and try login using the same email id/pwd it says id/pwd do not match neither it let me go for the option of forgot pwd, there it says that "we cant send you the temp pwd, try again later". i have been to many forums and seems like this probleme is quite common. any help would be highly appriciateable. thanks.

I had the same frustratingly slow performance issues rendering the phone almost un-usable other than voice calls. Every thing that required to go to menu and load something was just **bleep** slow.
I however resolved all issues by changing the messaging settings to use memory card for emails instead of phone memory.
Do the following and instantly your phone will come alive again.
Menu - Communications - Messaging - Mail for Exchange - Settings - Other - Memory in Use - Memory Card
Do the same for other mail accounts.
MAGIC !!!

IOS 6.1.4 - Apple Native Email Client - Push Notification is not working

Hi, I just upgraded to IOS 6.1.4 this morning no issues Upgrade went well.
Now My Email Push Notfication is not working.
1. Bussiness Gmail Account - Configured as Exchange
2. Hotmail Account - Configured as Exchange
Both Account - Push is ON
if some one send email i am not getting it. I have to manually open the Native Email client then i can see.
Restarted the IPhone Twice.
Any one facing similar issue?

1.   Removed the Email Account and Added again - Problem Presist.
2.   Erase All Content - Restored from previous Backup - No Luck
3.   Again Erased All Content - Setup as New Phone - Just add Gmail Enterprise Email Account - Not Working.
Surprisingly - Icloud / Hotmail PUSH Notifications works Fine.
I have removed all My Devices from the Google Apps Administrator page and re-requeste for new deivce and then tried all the above still same Issues.
Now what?
Any one experiencing this issue?

Performance issues with flashed 7800GT (G5)

Hey,
I recently flashed a PC 7800GT with the 128K OEM NVidia ROM. It's one of the cards with a physical 128K ROM chip, so no worries there. However, it doesn't deliver the performance I expected. I have a Late 2005 2.0 DC, 10GB DDR2 and use Leopard 10.5.8.
This is what OS X puts out (german):
NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT:
Chipsatz-Modell:    GeForce 7800GT
Typ:    Monitor
Bus:    PCIe
Steckplatz:    SLOT-1
PCIe-Lane-Breite:    x16
VRAM (gesamt):    256 MB
Hersteller:    NVIDIA (0x10de)
Geräte-ID:    0x0092
Versions-ID:    0x00a1
ROM-Version:    2152.2
Performance issues are: I can't seem to reach frame rates that are anywhere near the results provided by barefeats. Quake 3 runs with approx 200fps in 1600x1200x32 (I expected 300+ fps), Quake 4 and UT2004 run okay, but not on high settings with high resolutions. So, not equivalent to what you wouldd expect from the system's specs) Same goes for Colin McRae Rallye. Now, I remember reading about performance issues in 10.5.8 with the flashed ROM since it doesn't seem to be a 1:1 copy of the original one. I didn't try it in Tiger since I don't exactly want to go back from Leopard. Am I right that this is probably an issue of the "OEM ROM" (from the macelite)? Does anyone have the real deal in terms of 7800GT ROMs and could provide me with a link?
Br

Hi-
If you send me an email via my website, I can send you a couple of ROMs that might work better.
http://www.jcsenterprises.com/Japamacs_Page/All_Things_PPC.html
Problem with the flashed 256 MB GT, though, is that Leopard runs slow.
Bad driver interaction.....
The 512 MB GTX is the way to go........

Performance issues with LOV bindings in 3-tier BC4J architecture

We are running BC4J and JClient (Jdeveloper 9.0.3.4/9iAS 9.0.2) in a 3-tier architecture, and have problems with the performance.
One of our problems are comboboxes with LOV bindings. The view objects that provides data for the LOV bindings contains simple queries from tables with only 4-10 rows, and there are no view links or entity objects to these views.
To create the LOV binding and to set the model for the combobox takes about 1 second for each combobox.
We have tried most of tips in http://otn.oracle.com/products/jdev/tips/muench/jclientperf/index.html, but they do not seem to help on our problem.
The performance is OK (if not great) when the same code is running as 2-tier.
Does anyone have any good suggestions?

I can recommend that you look at the following two bugs in Metalink: Bug 2640945 and Bug 3621502
They are related to the disabling of the TCP socket-level acknowledgement which slows down remote communications for EJB components using ORMI (the protocol used by Oracle OC4J) to communicate between remote EJB client and server.
A BC4J Application Module deployed as an EJB suffers this same network latency penalty due to the TCP acknowledgement.
A customer sent me information (that you'll see there as a part of Bug# 3621502) like this on a related issue:
We found our application runs very slow in 3-Tier mode (JClient, BC4J deployed
as EJB Session Bean on 9iAS server 9.0.2 enterprise edition). We spent a lot
of time to tune up our codes but that helped very little. Eventually, we found
the problem seemed to happen on TCP level. There is a 200ms delay in TCP
level. After we read some documents about Nagle Algorithm, we disabled a
registry key (TcpDelAckTicks) in windows2000 on both client and server. This
makes our program a lot faster.
Anyway, we think we should provide our clients a better solution other than
changing windows registry for them, for example, there may be a way to disable
that Nagle's algorithm through java.net.Socket.setTcpNoDelay(true), in BC4J,
or anywhere in our codes. We have not figured out yet.
Bug 2640945 was fixed in Oracle Application Server 10g (v9.0.4) and it now disables this TCP Acknowledgement on the server side in that release. In the BugDB, I see backport patches available for earlier 9.0.3 and 9.0.2 releases of IAS as well.
Bug 3621502 is requesting that that same disabling also be performed on the client side by the ORMI code. I have received a test patch from development to try out, but haven't had the chance yet.
The customer's workaround in the interim was to disable this TCP Acknowledgement at the OS level by modifying a Windows registry setting as noted above.
See Also http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=328890
"New registry entry for controlling the TCP Acknowledgment (ACK) behavior in Windows XP and in Windows Server 2003" which documents that the registry entry to change disable this acknowledgement has a different name in Windows XP and Windows 2003.
Hope this info helps. It would be useful to hear back from you on whether this helps your performance issue.

Performance issues with the Vouchers index build in SES

Hi All,
We are currently performing an upgrade for: PS FSCM 9.1 to PS FSCM 9.2.
As a part of the upgrade, Client wants Oracle SES to be deployed for some modules including, Purchasing, Payables (Vouchers)
We are facing severe performance issues with the Vouchers index build. (Volume of data = approx. 8.5 million rows of data)
The index creation process runs for over 5 days.
Can you please share any information or issues that you may have faced on your project and how they were addressed?

Check the following logs for errors:
1. The message log from the process scheduler
2. search_server1-diagnostic.log in /search_server1/logs directory
If the build is getting stuck while crawling then we typically have to increase the Java Heap size for the Weblogic instance for SES>

Performance issues with FDK in large XML documents

In my current project with FrameMaker 8 I'm experiencing severe performance issues with some FDK API calls.
The documents are about 3-8 MBytes in size. Fortmatted they cover 150-250 pages.
When importing such an XML document I do some extensive "post-processing" using FDK. This processing happens in Sr_EventHandler() during the SR_EVT_END_READER event. I noticed that some FDK functions calls which modify the document's structure, like F_ApiSetAttribute() or F_ApiNewElementInHierarchy(), take several seconds, for the larger documents even minutes, to complete one single function call. I tried to move some of these calls to earlier events, mostly to SR_EVT_END_ELEM. There the calls work without a delay. Unfortunately I can't rewrite the FDK client to move all the calls that are lagging to earlier events.
Does anybody have a clue why such delays happen, and possibly can make a suggestion, how to solve this issue? Thank you in advance.
PS: I already thought of splitting such a document in smaller pieces by using the FrameMaker book function. But I don't think, the structure of the documents will permit such an automatic split, and it definitely isn't an option to change the document structure (the project is about migrating documents from Interleaf to XML with the constraint of keeping the document layout identical).

FP_ApplyFormatRules sounds really good--I'll give it a try on Monday. Wonder how I could miss it, as I already tried FP_Reformatting and FP_Displaying at no avail?! By the way, what is actually meant with FP_Reformatting (when I used it I assumed it would do exactly what FP_ApplyFormatRules sounds to do), or is that one another of Lynne's well-kept secrets?
Thank's for all the helpful suggestions, guys. On Friday I already had my first improvements in a test version of my client: I did some (not all necessary) structural changes using XSLT pre-processing, and processing went down from 8 hours(!) to 1 hour--Yeappie! I was also playing with the idea of writing a wrapper to F_ApiNewElementInHierarchy() which actually pastes an appropriate element created in a small flow on the reference pages at the intended insertion location. But now, with FP_ApplyFormatRules on the horizon, I'm quite confident to get even the complicated stuff under control, which cannot be handled by the XSLT pre-processing, as it is based on the actual formatting of the document at run-time and cannot be anticipated in pre-processing.
--Franz

N8 email client performance issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for