N9 showing incorrect data space

I transferred my music to my N9 thru nokia link. Then, i deleted them by mounting thru mass storage. Afterwards, anually deleting the music folder.
I then want to sync my phone thru nokia link, however, the space where i deleted my files were not restored.
Which means, the data space were still the same before and after i deleted my files.
EVen the data storage in the settings were not updaed. The space in the nokia link were known as others.
Any solutions? 

Hi. I had exactly the same problem and I ended up doing a reset and this sorted the "problem"

Similar Messages

  • Crystal report showing Incorrect data against Bex Query

    I have created Crystal report on top of Bex Query, I have not done any calculations in the report, just dragging structure and key figure in the report, ran for one month, when I compare with Bex Query with same period, it is showing incorrect data.
    I don't know what can be wrong here?
    We are Business Objects 3.1 SP3.
    Thanks,
    Ravi

    HI,
    I would suggest you trace the workflow in Web INtelligence according to these notes:
    Tracing:
    Unix : Note 1235111
    Windows : Note 1260004
    and then post a link for downloading the trace files here.
    regards
    Ingo

  • Report Viewer shows incorrect data when viewing pages from last to first

    Post Author: Fmorales
    CA Forum: .NET
    Hello.
    I've made a huge report with Crystal Reports for Visual Studio 2005, and sometimes the Report Viewer show data with errors.
    If I see all pages of my report in order, 1 first, then 2nd, 3, 4... until the last one.... The report is always correct.
    If I see all pages in reverse order, 1 first (shown by default), then last one, then last one-1.... until 2nd.. All years show incorrect, except first one... 
    In an outer section, for every year, there is a final row which shows summarize calculated data. The error consists in that every value of the row is 0.
    It seems that Crystal Report calculates while showing, that's good.. but... Why does it ignore the data before when I see directly the last page?? It forces me to see all pages one by one in ascendant order to ensure data is correct.. I must fix that error.
    The way I calculate data in the problematic summarize row is a bit complicated, but I'll try... Let's focus in one only column (the other ones are similar). The summarize value is a formula which simply show a global value :
    WhilePrintingRecords;
    CurrencyVar margenActual;
    which is being increasing or decreasing along the group:
    WhilePrintingRecords;
    CurrencyVar actual:=actual+CurrentFieldValue; 
    if {PresupPeriodifMesesAux_DS.TIPO} = 'PAGOS' then         CurrencyVar margenActual:=margenActual-CurrentFieldValueelse    CurrencyVar margenActual:=margenActual+CurrentFieldValue;
    DefaultAttribute
    It is placed in the backgrond property of a CrossTab cell in a hidden pre-section... Well.. I know it's a bit complicated, but I have to do that way because it was the only trick I found to make a summarize file before printing data summarized (that's why the line "CurrencyVar actual:=actual+CurrentFieldValue;" appeared in formula). So I also wanted to use this formula to acummulate "margenActual".
    In the inner section I reset the actual value (this value always go fine):
    WhilePrintingRecords;
    CurrencyVar actual:=0; 
    Before end of year I reset the margenActual value:
    WhilePrintingRecords;
    CurrencyVar margenActual:=0; 
    I've tried multiple combinations (using WhileReadingRecords instead WhilePrintingRecords) but data is incorrect or I cannot get rid of visualization page's problem....
    Any idea?
    Thanks a lot

    quote:
    Originally posted by:
    ntsiii
    If you were previously using <mxXML> you WERE using
    e4x.
    So remove that tag, create an instance variable of the same
    name, typed as xml, and in your result handler, do as VarioPegged
    suggests, though I would cast/convert to xml first:
    companies = XML(event.result);
    trace(companies.toXMLString()); to look at your xml
    var xlCompanies:XMLList = xmlCompanies..company; //all such
    expressions return XMLList, never XML
    trace(xmlCompanies.length()); //
    Tracy
    Ok so the ID of the mxXML was being interpreted as an E4X
    variable at compile time?
    I tried changing the name of the ID of the HTTPService call
    from "marketData" to "MDATA" and assigning the variable marketData
    to the result of the HTTPService query, which if I understand you
    correctly should basically make everything work as it was before,
    but it seems to be a problem.
    when I try to run it puts an exclamation point on this line
    <toolbox:TreeMap id="treeMap" width="1200" height="800"
    dataProvider="{marketData}"
    labelField="@cname" weightField="@amount"
    colorFunction="{itemToColor}"
    toolTipFunction="{itemToToolTip}"/>
    That code refers to a SWC file. Apparently it wants
    marketData to be a data provider. If I change the dataProvider
    reference above to "MDATA" (the ID of the HTTPService) the App
    compiles, but I get two errors at runtime:
    TypeError: Error #1009: Cannot access a property or method of
    a null object reference.
    ReferenceError: Error #1081: Property @age1 not found on
    mx.rpc.http.mxml.HTTPService and there is no default value.
    What should I change this reference to? It won't compile if I
    use the variable I made for the e4x results and it is reading
    gibberish if I have it read directly from the
    HTTPService....?

  • SQL Dev 1.5.3 Data Grid showing incorrect data

    After upgrading to SQL Dev 1.5.3, I have seen instances of incorrect data displayed in the data grid (when displaying many records at a time), both in the Table Browser and in SQL Worksheet.
    For example, in the grid, it shows a value 1234 for a column. Now when I query just that row, the correct results are shown.
    Has anyone noticed this?
    Thanks,
    Manish

    Any updates on this? I am hitting this bug and it makes life very uncomfortable as I cannot trust the results.
    SQL Developer 1.5.3 + JDK 1.6.11 on Windows XP.

  • Im having problem in Mail. Sent is showing incorrect date and also not showing sent emails that have been successfully sent. Is it a virus?

    Having trouble in MAIL. Running MacOSX(10.6.8) and in MAIL the SENT both doesnt show sent messages( successfully received) and doesnt show correct date sent. Any ideas??

    Not sure about the time stamp problem, but the missing "Sent" mails problem is not uncommon. This problem is one that a lot of people have and in my opinion, I think it's a problem with Apple's mail application, nothing at the user's end.
    Does this happen only when you include an attachment or does that matter? Also, does it only happen when your outgoing message is delayed a bit? Check your junk/spam folder to see if your sent messages went in there.
    This doesn't fix anything, but you might change your e-mail settings so that all new mails are automatically sent Bcc to yourself.
    Sometimes the "missing" sent mails are not going in the right folder. I'm sure you probably already know, but in the left-hand column in MAIL, under Mailboxes, there is a second "sent" folder way at the bottom, depending on your other e-mail accounts, such as Yahoo or Gmail). Many people have discovered their missing "sent" e-mails in those.
    It is a big hassle, for sure, and has been officially reported. Users with complaints are being told that Apple's Intrusion Detection and Prevention (IDP) systems block the connection from a user's e-mail client when it attempts to store outgoing e-mails, which contain attachments, to the users'  sent folder.
    This is supposedly due to the Mac OS/Mac Mail sending non-standard or erroneous commands to the server, emulating the activity which would be generated by an attacker attempting to abuse an exploit in the IMAP server. I doubt you are doing anything wrong, so it's just a matter of waiting for them to FIX this annoying issue.

  • SQL Server 2008 R2 Disk Usage report showing incorrect data file

    When I go to ANY database (System, AdventureWorks*, user) in Managemant Studio, I right-click on the db, select Reports, select Standard Reports, and select Disk Usage.  The disk usage report shows the correct db on top, but always only shows AdventureWorks_Data.mdf
    when I expand Disk Space Used by Data Files section.  This happens to any db I try.  When I look at Database Properties/Files for that database, the logical and physical file names are correct.
    Since the correct files appear in Database Properties/Files, I'm hoping it's just a bug in the report.  Same thing happens if I run a Disk Usage by Table report for ANY database,  The tables for AdventureWorks always only appear,
    Thanks,  Mike

    Thanks Tibor!
    I looked at the Properties for my login under Security/Logins and it shows my default db to be master.  Not sure if this is correct, but it sounds plausible.  I'll see if I can report the problem.
    The only issue I can think of that was out of the ordinary for the install of 2008 R2 EE was this:
    I originally installed 2005 DE, since it wouldn't expire.  After the install of 2005 DE, I decided to uninstall it and install 2008 R2 EE.  In between the installs of 2005 DE and 2008 R2 EE, I installed/uninstalled stupid stuff like 2008
    Express, 2008 Express with Advanced Services (?), and 2008 EE.  After each uninstall I also did a system restore to be safe.
    Now each time I open Management Studio, i get a pop-up stating that there are SQL Server 2005 registered servers on my sytem and asks me if I want to add them into Management Studio.  I always say no.
    The AdventureWorks db is from 2005 and was installed automatically with 2005.  I installed the 2005, 2008, and 2008 R2 AdventureWorks databases to my R2 for class.  I'm not sure now if the Disk Usage report is showing me AdventureWorks_Data.mdf
    because of my install into 2008 R2 EE or my previous install of 2005 DE.
    Hope this kind of makes sense...
    -Mike

  • Phone Disk Shows Incorrect Free Space

    Hi all
    I am using Phone Disk on the Mac (makes the iPad/iPhone show up as a hard drive) and its showing the incorrect amount of hard drive capacity and free space.  It does this on both mine and my girlfriends iPhone and also on my iPad. For example, I know I have 10gb available on my 64gb iPad but Phone Disk shows me I have only 900mb free out of 1.5gb of hard drive space.  I have also installed iPhone Explorer and this also has the same problem.  I'm a little confused!
    Thanks
    Rich

    The available disk space reported in finder is totally wrong.
    Even if it accounts for the local snapshots. In my macbook air it shows 120 Available in finder which is just 1GB less than my SSD capacity.
    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4467217

  • Creative Cloud Desktop App Shows Incorrect Free Space Remaining

    Hello,
    I have a technical issue with my creative cloud account.  My CC desktop application (Windows) shows as having 46.7% of the available space used, and at present I have no files stored or in my creative cloud archive.  Something is definitely amiss! 
    Thanks,
    -Jon

    @randyc - Please provide more details. Are you still seeing the "Out of storage" message?
    If so we need the log files for desktop sync (CoreSync). The location for each OS are:
    Mac OS X: ~/Library/Application Support/Adobe/CoreSync/CoreSync-yyyy-mm-dd.log
    Windows: %APPDATA%/Adobe/CoreSync/CoreSync-yyyy-mm-dd.log
    Note that on Mac OS X to see the user library from the Finder click on the Go menu and hold down the Alt/ Option key. Note that on Windows %APPDATA% is a variable that will change to the correct path depending on if version of Windows being used.

  • Bex Query showing incorrect data

    Hi Experts,
    I have a Bex query on an infoset. The infoset is based on Sales Order Line Item DSO and Sales Order Condition DSO. I am refering Net value from Sales Order Line Item DSO. In the query, the values of Net Value is not coming correctly. When i check the value in Sales Order Line Item DSO it shows 100. However, in the query it shows 500. When i checked the infoset, it had 5 records. In each record, the net value was 100. What should i do to get the correct value of Net Value in the query.
    Have anyone faced similar problem ?
    Please reply as soon as possible.
    Thanks,
    Saachi

    Hi Sachi,
    This is a common problem in infoset.
    Sales order line item - SLI say
    Sales order condition - SC say.
    The value you see in your net value field depends on your join condition in the infoset.
    Currently you have join in such a way that 1 record in SLI correspods to 5 records in SLC (this is as per your join condition), hence you see this error. Youcan manupilate your join condition to get the required result, if this is viable.
    However, in most cases you may not be able to alleviate the fields defining the join.
    Say your sales order and item form the joining fields, then in sales order condition DSO you have 5 records for that sales order and item.
    The way you could probably avoid net value getting multiplied 5 times is by using exception aggregation  with reference char a characteristic in the query.
    The ref char should uniquely identify the 5 sales order item condition lines.
    (basic principle - we have to net value/ no of lines in Sales order condition DSO [5 in this case] .)
    The problem, however is, whenever you consider uniqueness defining fields, you would look at the keys of DSO, because they define uniqueness. One could have multiple infoobject when defining a DSO key.
    So you would'nt be able to define any record with only one particular infoobject(ref char), based on which you could define the  exception aggreation.
    You could define one more data field in the DSO which is a concatenation of all of its keys and then use it in exception aggreg as a reference char in the query.
    One more way is to load data from the two DSO to further cubes to achieve the requirement.
    I think, this is the limitation with the infoset.
    Please let me know if you find any other solution.
    Hope it helps,
    Regards,
    Sunmit.

  • Disk Utility Shows Incorrect Free Space

    I've had this problem for a while now, and I've been unable to figure out why. I can't even remember when it started, but it has become quite a nuisance.
    The Finder window shows that I have 302GB of harddrive space remaining, out of 500GB. The Activity Monitor and Disk Utility show I have 240GB space remaining, and my System Profiler shows I have 239GB remaining. I just deleted a bunch of old TV shows off of iTunes (about 40GB worth) to open up some space, but only the Finder changed (up to 302GB from 260GB) but the Activity Monitor, Disk Utility, and System Profiler haven't changed.
    Now, I'll assume the Finder is showing the correct amount of space, but I'm wondering why the other utilites are showing the incorrent amount of space. I have a feeling maybe something was screwed up when I created a 50GB Windows 7 partition through Boot Camp a couple months ago.
    I've attempted to Repair Disk through the Disk Utility and it says everything looks fine. Any solutions to this minor inconvenience? Or at least an answer as to why this is happening?

    The available disk space reported in finder is totally wrong.
    Even if it accounts for the local snapshots. In my macbook air it shows 120 Available in finder which is just 1GB less than my SSD capacity.
    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4467217

  • Custome Views Defined Showing Incorrect Data

    Dear All,
    When users apply filters -> define and save custom views, they see instances in their defined view which have actually already gone out from the current activity.
    This gives them an incorrect picture of the view at any point causing great amount of disgruntlement especially among the managers who need to know how many tasks are there in the queue and accordingly plan for it.
    If we go to Internet explorer settings and delete temporary internet files and cookies then it does work and shows the users the correct figure. But every now and then an incorrect view is shown to user and users have to keep performing this irritating activity of deleting cookies.
    Can anybody throw light on how best this can be handled and why the problem is occuring in the first place
    Regards,
    Viraj Churi

    I've seen this happen with people abruptly close out of a prior view by using the back button having multiple windows open in BPM, or by closing a browser window on a view. You can educate the managers by telling them to not do this, but that never goes over very well, does it...
    If this is the problem, you'll need to experiment with various causes, there may be some code remedies for this. I don't have the code handy to show you, but I believe we solved this using <BODY onUnload> or <BODY onBeforeUnload>. You can also try using windows.onclose and Javascript. These solutions are problematic as well and are not always supported on all browsers and versions. I'll see if I can find better code examples later, but you might try to pinpoint what is causing it and focus your solution based on that. (Back-button, or windows closing, etc.) There are also many post on this subject you can find through Google.
    HTH,
    Mark

  • The ' usage' app showing incorrect data usage.

    The amount of data used shown in usage app is incorrect when i checked the actual amount used with carrier.
    Sometimes its much larger and sonetimes much smaller than actual amount used.

    Hello,
    I understand that you are having problems with the cost control application in your Firefox OS device. In order to better understand and investigate on the issue that you are encountering, please reply to this message with the following information:
    * What is the model of your phone?
    * What is the OS version and Build ID found in the Device Information page? Please visit [http://mzl.la/Gzz6Kp this link] if you need help finding the Build ID of your phone.
    * Please provide the exact steps to reproduce the issue you are encountering.
    * Who is your current cell phone carrier?
    * How often do you encounter this issue?
    Please be sure to include as much detail as possible, including any websites that may exhibit this issue, and any error messages that you may be receiving, exactly as they appear. This will ensure that we will have all the information needed to investigate into this. Thank you for your help and we look forward to hearing from you!
    - Ralph

  • GRACUSER is showing incorrect data

    Hello,
    We have 2 data sources connected to GRC system suppose say as SOURCE1 and SOURCE2.
    User details along with personal number present in both the source systems. We have configugred first source system is SOURCE1 and second is SOURCE2.
    But after the synchronization, in the table GRACUSER is showing connector as SOURCE2 for some users instead details are present in SOURCE1.
    Why the system has skipped the details in SOURCE1 and updated GRACUSER as SOURCE2.
    Please advise ?

    Here we go, will explain again, i think now it will be clearer to everyone:
    How entries are being added in the GRACUSER and GRACUSERCONN:
    The table GRACUSERCONN will have one entry for each combination of
    user vs. connector.
    Example: User A exists in connectors A11 and A12. Then GRACUSERCONN table
    will have two entries:
    User A for A11
    User A for A12
    But in case of GRACUSER table, this table contains one entry per user.
    So with reference to the above example, if you execute sync for connector
    A11, then you will have one entry in GRACUSER for user A and A11.
    If you execute a subsequent sync job, now for connector A12, then the
    existing entry for user A will be overwritten with user details from
    connector A12.
    So it means you will have only one entry in GRACUSER at a
    time, that will reflect the last connector you have run the sync for.
    Now it comes the role of the master user search source.
    If you do not maintain anything in SPRO (.."Maintain data source
    configuration") then it will work as above mentioned. The user A entry
    will always be overwritten every time you run the sync for a different
    connector/last connector.
    But if you have maintained any of the connector like A11 or A12 in the
    SPRO data source configuration, then the priority will be given based
    on that. Note that there are sequences, so you may have one or more
    data source connectors, and they will have priority among themselves
    based on the sequence number they are assigned to.
    Example: you have maintained A11 in SPRO then even if you will execute
    sync job for A12, user A entry will not be overwritten. This is because
    A12 does not have the priority.
    The same applies if you have maintained A11 and A12 in data source
    configuration. A11 with sequence 1, and A12 with sequence 2.
    If you will execute sync job for A12, user A entry will not be
    overwritten, because A11 has higher sequence priority.
    How is that guys? better?
    Thanks!

  • After upgrading to elements 12 the metadata shows incorrect date created?

    After upgrading from elements 8 to 12 all the pictures in the album have a new date created in the metadata the is the date I upgraded.  this is incorrect because the picture was not created on this date but moved or updated.  This is a problem when running things like screen savers that go by date created.  How do I fix the metadata to reflect the actual date the picture was created?

    After upgrading from elements 8 to 12 all the pictures in the album have a new date created in the metadata the is the date I upgraded.  this is incorrect because the picture was not created on this date but moved or updated.  This is a problem when running things like screen savers that go by date created.  How do I fix the metadata to reflect the actual date the picture was created?

  • My iPhone 4s in iTunes shows incorrect free space!

    Okay, this is very odd... when my iPhone 4S is plugged in, it says that I have way more free space than should be available?  What in the world is going on?  I wished I had the 64 GB iPhone, but I don't.  It seems to incorrectly calculate my free space on my iPhone 4S repeatedly.  I am doing a restore of my iPhone right now, hoping that will address the issue.  Now I do have iTune Match turned on and am wondering if that has something to do with this?  It seems to get confused with what I had on my iPhone and what is in iTune Mactch.  I only saw this after doing the iTune Match thingy.

    Hey - did you get anywhere with this?
    I have the exact same problem and it is definitely related to iTunes Match (I enabled 24 hours ago and the problem started immediately).
    In my case the actual phone displays the correct information (about 1.3gb free) but via iTunes (either connecting over wifi or over usb) it displays 19.4 gb free.
    In my case the difference is almost exactly the size of my iTunes library.
    Here is what I belive is happening (no fix yet).
    I have enabled iTunes Match on my phone but I have left the song files on the phone (i.e. I play files actually from the device and not from the cloud) . Now, when I connect to iTunes, iTunes sees merely that iTunes Match is enabled and therefore belives that the phone does not contain any downloaded music (or at least did not contain any at the point iTunes Match was enabled) and therefore displays a library-size chunk as free space.
    One fix which I suspect would work would be to delete my entire library from the iPhone, enable itunes Match and redownload the entire library from the phone. That however is not something I want to entertain at present.
    This has to be a bug at Apple's end - I hope they fix it soon!

Maybe you are looking for