N95, route 66 patch update causes fail

I had installed route 66 ok on my nokia n95, but of course i found that the internal GPS would not work with this App, so i found there was a patch available and guess what it said that the patch was to fix the use of the internal gps, so away i went and installed the patch on the phone.. then to my amazement the aplication would not load at all, something about security on a file. can anyone help here as the route 66 people dont seem to want to answer my mails.
thx in advance.

I used the Route66 version 7 patch and it worked fine with my N95 8GB, however I did it on a 'clean' install. Like the previous poster, I would suggest you either uninstall Route66 or better, backup then reformat the phone and try again.

Similar Messages

  • Apple TV Setup Problems - Buffalo Router keeps crashing / update keeps failing

    So I've been having a multitude of problems getting my brand-new Apple TV (3rd generation) set up and working. Let's start with the fact that no matter what I try, I can't seem to upgrade its firmware (which I figure is step 1 to getting everything else working).
    In general, it seems that my problems are related to my router. I have a Buffalo WHR-HP-G54 that's a few years old. No firmware updates, I've checked. Doesn't seem to have *any* firewall settings. But whenever I try to connect my Apple TV to this router, the following will occur:
    - I will be unable to connect or sign in to the iTunes Store via the Apple TV
    - I will be unable to update the Apple TV's system software
    - The router will inevitably stop responding to all connected devices, requiring me to manually restart it.
    And *here's* a fun development: so having gone through the above multiple times, I try connecting the Apple TV to my (Mac) computer and try a system restore through iTunes (latest version). Not only does the download fail (see screenshot below for error), but the router will stop responding/crash *yet again*, just as if I'd had the Apple TV connected directly to it!
    Does anyone know what's going on here, and how I might go about fixing it? Thank you.

    Given all the problems you've had I would suggest an erase and reinstall using Disk Utility in the Recovery Volume (command - R or hold down the option key during a restart).
    Disk Utility - Format,  Erase,  or  Reformat  a  Drive

  • Critical patch update fails with error code 73

    RDBMS Version: 10.2.0.3
    Operating System and Version: solaris 5.9
    Error Number (if applicable): error code 73
    Product (i.e. SQL*Loader, Import, etc.): oracle server enterpirse edition
    Product Version: 10.2.0.3
    Critical patch update fails with errors(urgent)
    UD00_102030>pwd
    /mnt/base_install/downloads/10gR2/cpu/6394981
    UD00_102030> opatch apply
    Invoking OPatch 10.2.0.3.0
    Oracle interim Patch Installer version 10.2.0.3.0
    Copyright (c) 2005, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved..
    Oracle Home : /u01/app/oracle/product/10.2.0
    Central Inventory : /u01/app/oracle/oraInventory
    from : /var/opt/oracle/oraInst.loc
    OPatch version : 10.2.0.3.0
    OUI version : 10.2.0.3.0
    OUI location : /u01/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/oui
    Log file location : /u01/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/cfgtoollogs/opatch/opatch2007-10-19_19-53-31PM.log
    Failed to load the patch object. Possible causes are:
    The specified path is not an interim Patch shiphome
    Meta-data files are missing from the patch area
    Patch location = /mnt/base_install/downloads/10gR2/cpu/6394981
    Details = PatchObject constructor: Input file "/mnt/base_install/downloads/10gR2/cpu/6394981/etc/config/actions" or "/mnt/base_install/downloads/10gR2/cpu/6394981/etc/config/inventory" does not exist.
    ApplySession failed: PatchObject constructor: Input file "/mnt/base_install/downloads/10gR2/cpu/6394981/etc/config/actions" or "/mnt/base_install/downloads/10gR2/cpu/6394981/etc/config/inventory" does not exist.
    System intact, OPatch will not attempt to restore the system
    OPatch failed with error code 73
    This cpu oct 2007 patch for 10.2.0.3(for solaris)

    That's great :) ...
    Does anybody know which is the difference between
    opatch napply
    and
    opatch apply ?
    thanks,
    P.

  • Windows 7 X86 Update patch installation failed ("Updateshandler.log - Update execution failed")

    Hi,
    I am using SCCM 2007 R3 at client site, Since from Jan 2015 and for Feb 2015 also i am facing a problem in Windows 7 32bit OS Patch installation failure on Client PC. I am creating a bundle for Windows 7 OS Patch's and targeting these monthly patches to
    windows 7 Collection having X86 and X64 bit OS.
    From All the Deployed Patches only X64 bit Win 7 PC's are getting successfully Update.
    BUT on all X86(32Bit) win 7 OS there was Installation Failed Error. The UPDATES are getting successfully downloaded in CACHE folder on client PC's but while installation they are getting failed. I have tried reinstalling SCCM Client on PC but problem persists.
    Checked number of forum's and done WUA re-installtion  as well, Tried downloading new patches for win7 32 bit and deployed again, but no +ve result. WSUS reconfigured and reinstalled and approved all patches again, again no solution.
    Updates for all other OS's Like Win 8, 8.1 Server 2003,2008 and 2012 for X86 and C64 all working fine.
    Updateshandler.log Giving :---- Update execution failed.
    MP DP and all other roles are working fine with SUP role reinsalled.
    Tried:-
    https://technet.microsoft.com/en-in/library/bb932189.aspx
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/sudheesn/archive/2010/11/10/troubleshooting-sccm-part-iii-software-updates.aspx
    https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/systemcenter/en-US/c8c8715e-a1f7-4de1-b17f-d3a72c24db6c/updates-not-show-up?forum=configmgrsum
    Please anyone help..
    Regards
    Rajiv.

    1. We have tried downloading patch again & again . Try to push them trough SCCM targeting win7 collection having x-86 & x-64 bit OS.
    2. Tried manual installation of . Cab files also on 10 win 7 x-86 PC's but all failing with error code.0x800706f7. This code shows The stub received bad data. In both cases (manual & SCCM )
    3. Even tried downloading .MSU files for same KB article that also not getting installed
    4. Monitored Windowsupdate.log & DISM.log & CBS.log
    Handler Fatal: CBS called error with 0x800706f7
    warning exit code=0x00000000; call error code=0x80240022
    5. Tried renaming windir/Softwaredeployment folder to windir/Softwaredeployment.log & run SFC /Scannow
    0x800706F7 -2147023113 RPC_X_Bad_Stub_Data This can occur after a control selfupdate that has not fully completed and requires a reboot. The controls may need to be reregistered.
    This seems related to a problem within Windows, and ConfigMgr is not at fault - Windows has a severe issue which is affecting the servicing stack.
    Try CheckSUR.
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/roplatforms/archive/2011/04/28/installation-failures-cbs-store-corruptions-uncommon-issues-and-troubleshooting.aspx
    Don
    (Please take a moment to "Vote as Helpful" and/or "Mark as Answer", where applicable.
    This helps the community, keeps the forums tidy, and recognises useful contributions. Thanks!)

  • Smpatch update ALERT: Failed to install patch

    I do not even know where to start. Since installing Solaris 10 0606 it
    seems every time I try to patch the system I get failures of one type
    or another. One problem today has to do with zones:
    "To install the new instance of this package in all zones you must
    first remove the existing instance of this package from the global
    zone first (via pkgrm) and then install the new instance of this
    package in all zones."
    If sun already knows a pkgrm must be run why can't the smpatch command
    just do it?
    Another problem seems to be
    For patch 121018-03, required patch 120759-04 does not exist
    If sun knows a patch is required which is not on the system just Getit
    and install it.
    Also, what is up with having to reboot the box to install patches?
    Why? Has this always been a required step? Do these reboots pertain only to kernel patches .etc?
    I have seen other postings in this forum expressing unhappiness with
    the patch system, some mentioning testing lab/group or certification
    issues. I think smpatch should have an option to send smpatch results
    back to sun for review. That way the Certification Group could have
    real life situations to investigate. Or do they know the problems
    already and just dont want to fix them? Just once I would love it if
    smpatch came back with no failures and I was assured the system was
    patched, up to date and secure.
    Regards
    # smpatch update
    Update 120759-07 will not be downloaded since it already exists in the
    download directory.
    Update 121018-03 will not be downloaded since it already exists in the
    download directory.
    Update 121016-03 will not be downloaded since it already exists in the
    download directory.
    Update 121020-02 will not be downloaded since it already exists in the
    download directory.
    Update 121616-02 will not be downloaded since it already exists in the
    download directory.
    Update 120762-02 will not be downloaded since it already exists in the
    download directory.
    Installing patches from /var/sadm/spool...
    Failed to install patch 120759-07.
    patchadd utility failed. Reason code :0
    Validating patches...Loading patches installed on the
    system...Done!Loading patches requested to install.Done!Checking
    patches that you specified for installation.Done!Approved patches will
    be installed in this order:120759-07 Preparing checklist for
    non-global zone check...Checking non-global zones...The following
    requested patches rejected on non-global zone.Entire installation is
    possible but those patcheswill not be installed on non-global
    zone.myzone: Packages from patch 120759-07 are not installed on the
    system.myzone2: Packages from patch 120759-07 are not installed on the
    system.This patch passes the non-global zone check.None.Summary for
    zones:Zone myzoneRejected patches:120759-07 Patches that passed the
    dependency check:None.Zone myzone2Rejected patches:120759-07 Patches
    that passed the dependency check:None.Patching global zoneAdding
    patches...Checking installed patches...Verifying sufficient filesystem
    capacity (dry run method)...Patch 120759-07 failed to install due to a
    failure produced by pkgadd.See /var/sadm/patch/120759-07/log for
    detailsPatchadd is terminating. WARNING: patchadd returned <5> for
    global zone
    ALERT: Failed to install patch 120759-07.
    Failed to install patch 121018-03.
    patchadd utility failed. Reason code :0
    Validating patches...Loading patches installed on the
    system...Done!Loading patches requested to install.Done!Checking
    patches that you specified for installation.Done!The following
    requested patches will not be installed becauseno patches required by
    the patch are installed on this system. 0 For patch 121018-03,
    required patch 120759-04 does not exist.No patches to install.
    ALERT: Failed to install patch 121018-03.
    Failed to install patch 121016-03.
    patchadd utility failed. Reason code :0
    Validating patches...Loading patches installed on the
    system...Done!Loading patches requested to install.Done!Checking
    patches that you specified for installation.Done!The following
    requested patches will not be installed becauseno patches required by
    the patch are installed on this system. 0 For patch 121016-03,
    required patch 120759-06 does not exist.No patches to install.
    ALERT: Failed to install patch 121016-03.
    Failed to install patch 121020-02.
    patchadd utility failed. Reason code :0
    Validating patches...Loading patches installed on the
    system...Done!Loading patches requested to install.Done!Checking
    patches that you specified for installation.Done!The following
    requested patches will not be installed becauseno patches required by
    the patch are installed on this system. 0 For patch 121020-02,
    required patch 120759-01 does not exist.No patches to install.
    ALERT: Failed to install patch 121020-02.
    Failed to install patch 121616-02.
    patchadd utility failed. Reason code :0
    Validating patches...Loading patches installed on the
    system...Done!Loading patches requested to install.Done!Checking
    patches that you specified for installation.Done!Approved patches will
    be installed in this order:121616-02 Preparing checklist for
    non-global zone check...Checking non-global zones...The following
    requested patches rejected on non-global zone.Entire installation is
    possible but those patcheswill not be installed on non-global
    zone.myzone: Packages from patch 121616-02 are not installed on the
    system.myzone2: Packages from patch 121616-02 are not installed on the
    system.This patch passes the non-global zone check.None.Summary for
    zones:Zone myzoneRejected patches:121616-02 Patches that passed the
    dependency check:None.Zone myzone2Rejected patches:121616-02 Patches
    that passed the dependency check:None.Patching global zoneAdding
    patches...Checking installed patches...Verifying sufficient filesystem
    capacity (dry run method)...Patch 121616-02 failed to install due to a
    failure produced by pkgadd.See /var/sadm/patch/121616-02/log for
    detailsPatchadd is terminating. WARNING: patchadd returned <5> for
    global zone
    ALERT: Failed to install patch 121616-02.
    Failed to install patch 120762-02.
    patchadd utility failed. Reason code :0
    Validating patches...Loading patches installed on the
    system...Done!Loading patches requested to install.Done!Checking
    patches that you specified for installation.Done!Approved patches will
    be installed in this order:120762-02 Preparing checklist for
    non-global zone check...Checking non-global zones...The following
    requested patches rejected on non-global zone.Entire installation is
    possible but those patcheswill not be installed on non-global
    zone.myzone: Packages from patch 120762-02 are not installed on the
    system.myzone2: Packages from patch 120762-02 are not installed on the
    system.This patch passes the non-global zone check.None.Summary for
    zones:Zone myzoneRejected patches:120762-02 Patches that passed the
    dependency check:None.Zone myzone2Rejected patches:120762-02 Patches
    that passed the dependency check:None.Patching global zoneAdding
    patches...Checking installed patches...Verifying sufficient filesystem
    capacity (dry run method)...Patch 120762-02 failed to install due to a
    failure produced by pkgadd.See /var/sadm/patch/120762-02/log for
    detailsPatchadd is terminating. WARNING: patchadd returned <5> for
    global zone
    ALERT: Failed to install patch 120762-02.
    /var/sadm/spool/patchpro_dnld_2006.08.22@11:16:20:EDT.txt has been
    moved to
    /var/sadm/spool/patchproSequester/patchpro_dnld_2006.08.22@11:16:20:EDT.txt
    #

    Enterprise users have strict policies on change management so dependent patches are not automatically installed when using "smpatch add". Neither are packages blithly uninstalled for zones if currently only existing in the global zone.
    For your needs using "smpatch update" should analyse, download and install dependant patches in order for patches specified on the command line or for a global update. Note that that is with the exception of patches not matching the currently defined patch policy such as those needing a reboot. See the smpatch man page for information on policies.
    Patches requiring reboots or being installed in single user mode are primarily for kernel and driver patches.
    Your problems installing the Sun Studio 11 patches have been encountered previously in regards to globally installed packages (and are covered in this forum) and is due to a combination of bug ID's 6337009, 6214678 and 6374972 for the patching utilities of which the last is still open.
    You will currently have to manually install the patches using patchadd with the "-G" flag whilst in the global zone to install them in the global zone only.

  • How to resolve new update causing sim card to fail?

    Does anyone have any idea how to solve the problem with this update causing the sim card to fail?

    I could only confirm what didn't help in my case:
    - removing card was working only for 2-3 weeks
    - replacing sim card didn't help
    - rebooting device didn't help neither
    - reseting device - te same story.
    It is widely reported issue for iPhone 4, iPhone 4s, iPad2, iPad mini after upgrade to IOS 7.0.6 or 7.0.3
    Funny is that in my case only SIM card from not supported by Apple GSM operator works (I've tested about 12 SIMs).

  • Some patches update fail

    Hi All
    my customer scan one workstation ,and deliver 6 patches to this client. but he find only 5/6 patches update fine. I check the setting of the ZPM Bundle, all patches were set "continue on failure"....why the patch update fail (it is unpatched on this workstation),and whether the Bundle will auto re-send the patch again or not ?
    wyldkao

    wyld,
    It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
    posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
    Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
    - Visit http://support.novell.com and search the knowledgebase and/or check all
    the other self support options and support programs available.
    - You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
    correct newsgroup. (http://forums.novell.com)
    Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
    http://forums.novell.com/faq.php
    If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
    and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
    Good luck!
    Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
    http://forums.novell.com/

  • Patch 120185-09 failed to install (SO update 5)

    hi,
    on a SunOS 5.9 Generic_117171-09 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-15000
    i have this error:
    Checking installed patches...
    Verifying sufficient filesystem capacity (dry run method)...
    Patch 120185-09 failed to install due to a failure produced by pkgadd.
    See /var/sadm/patch/120185-09/log for details
    Patchadd is terminating.
    14:29 filesrv1:/home/mets1/wcohrs>more /var/sadm/patch/120185-09/log
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-es
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-es-help
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-es-res
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-fr
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-fr-help
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-fr-res
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-hu
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-hu-help
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-hu-res
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-it
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-it-help
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-it-res
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-nl
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-nl-help
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-nl-res
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-onlineupdate
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-pl
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-pl-help
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-pl-res
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-pt-BR
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-pt-BR-help
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-pt-BR-res
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-ru
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-ru-help
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-ru-res
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-sv
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-sv-help
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-sv-res
    Original package not installed.
    This appears to be an attempt to install the same architecture and
    version of a package which is already installed. This installation
    will attempt to overwrite this package.
    /mets1/user3/wcohrs/tmp/120185-09/SUNWstaroffice-base/install/checkinstall: /mets1/user3/wcohrs/tmp/1
    20185-09/SUNWstaroffice-base/install/checkinstall: cannot open
    pkgadd: ERROR: checkinstall script did not complete successfully
    Dryrun complete.
    No changes were made to the system.
    please help
    regards
    Wolfgang
    Message was edited by:
    kasimong
    solved
    see
    http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5066286&tstart=0

    The StarOffice patches are most likely being recommended as there are one or more SUNWstaroffice packages installed on the system, but the patch installation cannot complete due to an incomplete installation of StarOffice. Check for any installed StarOffice packages and remove them if present:
    # pkginfo | grep SUNWstaroffice

  • SSL patch update has caused many issues with my iPhone 5c

    Since the patch update completed, my iPhone is acting ridiculous. I cannot use safari. Every time I try to search something, it tells me it cannot connect to server. I also cannot delete voicemails. Once I delete, the phone freezes and the voicemail is not deleted. It comes back from deleted messages. When I hit the phone toggle button, it opens up my recent call list but it opens to the calls from Thursday, the day I did the update. It also deleted every text message that I had sent that day from my text history. I have shut the phone down, what other options do I have?

    I have actually talked to a couple people that I know that have the 5c and it seems like it is a hit or miss. Some people have problems with the blue ones, im having issues with the white one, some people have no issues att all. COnsider your son luck that he has no problems. I have had problems with 3 different whote 5c over the coarse of 4 months now and contuining to have problems.

  • Windows update causes all programs to fail

    Just recovered from windows update using system restore. After the update, no programs would run and gave an error something like "cannot access this program - do you want to remove it". The updates are the 7 most recent updates for windows 7.
    We have windows 7 pro sp1.

    Hi cisz,
    ""Installation failure." (Windows failed to install update.)"
    It seems that some updates has not been installed correctly ,please check for any failed updates from the update history (Control Panel\All Control Panel Items\Windows Update\View update history)
    Please take the following steps to have a troubleshoot and then check for update manually again (Manually create a restore point before checking for updates):
    1.If there is any third party antivirus software installed ,please turn them off temporarily .
    2.Run the built-in troubelshoot tool to have a diagnostic :
    Control Panel\All Control Panel Items\Troubleshooting\All Categories\Windows Update
    3.Clear the update cache :
    net stop wuauserv
    cd %systemroot%\SoftwareDistribution
    ren Download Download.old
    net start wuauserv
    After all the updates installed ,please restart the machine to make them take effect .If there is still any update installed failed, it is recommended to manually download it and install it to have a check .
    Best regards
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

  • Error when try to install CPU - Critical Patch Update with OPatch

    Hello gurus,
    I´m faccing with a problem... After I update the patch set to 10.2.0.4 and install the interim patches for Linux X86_64 now I´m trying to import/install the Oracle Critical Patch Update - Oracle CPU patch!!
    I´m trying to import it with OPatch, and I already update this OPatch tool for the last version even before proceeding with installation of Oracle CPU!
    I've tried to import it by two methods. The first I tried to apply as described in the relevant README file inside of CPU patch directory, and I used in this case the following command:
    redhatsap:orajmd>  unzip p9119226_10204_<platform>.zip
    redhatsap:orajmd>  cd 9119226
    redhatsap:orajmd>  opatch napply -skip_subset -skip_duplicate
    opatch: Command not found
    After that previous error, I tried again but now with other method that is described in note 839182 (Installing patches using OPatch) with the following command:
    redhatsap:orajmd>  cd 9119226
    redhatsap:orajmd>  $ORACLE_HOME/OPatch/opatch apply
    ========================================================
    GENERIC OPATCH VERSION - FOR USE IN SAP ENVIRONMENT ONLY
    ========================================================
    Invoking OPatch 10.2.0.4.5
    Oracle Interim Patch Installer version 10.2.0.4.5
    Copyright (c) 2008, Oracle Corporation.  All rights reserved.
    Oracle Home       : /oracle/JMD/102_64
    Central Inventory : /oracle/oraInventory
       from           : /etc/oraInst.loc
    OPatch version    : 10.2.0.4.5
    OUI version       : 10.2.0.4.0
    OUI location      : /oracle/JMD/102_64/oui
    Log file location : /oracle/JMD/102_64/cfgtoollogs/opatch/opatch2010-04-19_01-49-17AM.log
    Patch history file: /oracle/JMD/102_64/cfgtoollogs/opatch/opatch_history.txt
    Failed to load the patch object.  Possible causes are:
      The specified path is not an interim Patch shiphome
      Meta-data files are missing from the patch area
      Patch location = /oracle/JMD/102_64/9119226
      Details = PatchObject constructor: Input file "/oracle/JMD/102_64/9119226/etc/config/actions" or "/oracle/JMD/102_64/9119226/etc/config/inventory" does not exist.
    ApplySession failed: PatchObject constructor: Input file "/oracle/JMD/102_64/9119226/etc/config/actions" or "/oracle/JMD/102_64/9119226/etc/config/inventory" does not exist.
    System intact, OPatch will not attempt to restore the system
    OPatch failed with error code 73
    Can you help me please?
    Best regards
    João Dimas - Portugal

    Hello again Joe Bo... and all of others,
    I´m with a doubt after installing the CPU patch, which is related to post-installation tasks. I´m in this momment install the SAP System and it was during this installation that sapinst asked me to install the database and all other activities after this installation that are related to the database, for example, the updating of database patches.
    At README file in chapter 3.3.2 Post Installation Instructions is described the following:
    After installing the patch, perform the following actions:
    1.Load modified .sql files into the database, as explained in Section 3.3.2.1.
    2.Recompile views in the database, if necessary, as explained in Section 3.3.2.2.
    In this momment, as you certainly know, I still don´t have a database because the sap system isn´t yet totally installed (I´m in phase 8 of sapinst wizard).
    I only have to do this "Post Installation Tasks" when I have a database, this database will be created after that phase 8 - so now I don´t need to perform the post steps... am I right?
    Thanks in advance,
    João Dimas - Portugal

  • Static library not accessed properly after Solaris Kernel patch update !

    Hi,
    We are facing a sever issue in our application after our customer updated the Solaris 10 kernel patch u9 to u10.
    We have two static libraries libdlib.a and libDLIB.a, with exactly same code base, but these two libraries are scattered across the code base and linked by many shared objects in our application.
    However, one of the shared objects that links to "libdlib.a" library tries to access a function from "libDLIB.a". This behavior is causing a crash at a later point, since that shared object is supposed to access the function from "libdlib.a". Moreover, we found this is happening through the use of dbx.
    I'm unable to understand why this problem surfaced after kernel patch update, though still the shared object works fine on Solaris 10 u9 patch.
    Flow is something like this :
    1. syslogrecorder.so gets loaded by one of the processes.
    2. syslogrecorder.so is linked to "libdlib.a" at compile time, so it uses "libdlib.a" function DLIB_LoadLibrary and gets a handle to all the function pointers of the loaded library ( The purpose of DLIB_LoadLibrary is to load a shared library dynamically using dlopen )
    3. syslogrecorder.so tries to do a "dlsym" and to do that it needs access to the library handle which we got in previous call DLIB_LoadLibrary. So syslogrecorder.so calls another function from DLIB_ProcAddress, which actually gives back the access to the loaded shared library.
    Here is a catch in step 3, it is supposed to call DLIB_ProcAddress from the libdlib.a but as we observed from dbx output it does so by calling DLIB_ProcAddress from libDLIB.a and hence fails to give back the access to loaded shared library, causing crash at a later point in code.
    Can someone put some light here that why this could happen ??
    Thanks
    Kuldeep

    To clarify: You did not modify or rebuild any of your binaries, but after installing a kernel patch, the application stopped working. Most likely, something about your application depended on a accidental behavior of the runtime loader. That accidental behavior changed due to the patch, and your application failed.
    For example, if there is a circular dependency among shared libraries, the loader will break the cycle at an arbitrary point to establish an initialization order. By accident, that order might work, in the sense of not causing a problem. A change to the loader could cause the cycle to be broken at a different point, and the resulting initialization order could cause a now-uninitialized object to be accessed. I'm not saying this is what is wrong, but this is an example of a dependency on accidental loader behavior.
    Finding your actual problem will require tracing the sequence of operations leading up to the failure. You are more likely to find help in a Solaris linker forum. AFAIK, there are currently no Oracle forums for Solaris, and the old OpenSolaris forums have been converted to mailing lists. You can try the "tools-linking" list found on this page:
    http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo
    I also suggest you review the paper on best practices for using shared libraries written by Darryl Gove and myself:
    http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/articles/servers-storage-admin/linkinglibraries-396782.html
    If you have a service contract with Oracle, you can use your support channel to get more help.
    Edited by: Steve_Clamage on May 18, 2012 3:21 PM

  • IPad iOS 6.1.2 update causing excessive battery drain

    I have noticed in other discussions that a number of iPhone users have experienced excessive battery drain after updating to iOS 6.1.2.
    I am now experiencing this problem in a big way after updating to iOS 6.1.2 on an iPad 3.   Prior to this update, my battery life was very good, dropping to only 70% to 80% at the end of a typical day of use.
    After the update, which was said to be to fix a previious Mail Exchange battery drain issue (one that I was not experiencing), my battery was dropping to 30% after a few hours.   It was literally like holding a bucket with a hole in the bottom and watching the water drain out.
    I noticed that my Usage time and Standby time were identical, even though the ipad had been in sleep mode much of the time.   This indicates to me that something about this patch is causing the iPad not to actually sleep when in sleep mode.
    The iPhone discussion forums point to a number of possible fixes, including uninstalling all emails and re-installing them all the way to a total erasure and reinstalation of everything.  This worked for some, but not for all victims of this problem.
    Until Apple recognizes this problem and sends out another update, one less painful solution that worked for me was to change all of my email accounts from Push to Fetch every 15 minutes.   This has stopped the problem for me, for now. so I wanted to share this in case anyone else is experiencing similar problems.
    If other community members have discovered other short term or long term fixes then please do post here.
    Apple, I await an update that will allow me to restore Push functionality, or instructions on what steps will work to properly restore full functionality (what to remove and reinstall etc).

    Just to confirm that I have the same problem.  I updated to iOS6.1.2 on Friday 1 March 2013, I have an iPad2.  And Saturday morning my iPad was 0% after having nodded off on a 78% full battery.  This has NEVER happened before, and has become a daily occurrence.  I have now amended my Mail to fetch and hope it works.

  • Webi scheduling error in BO 4.0 SP04 after security patch updates in windows server 2008 R2

    We are getting  below error in BO 4.0 SP04 Web Intelligence report scheduling after security patch updates in windows server 2008 R2
    while trying to invoke the method com.businessobjects.sdk.core.server.IServer.getServerContext() of an object returned from com.businessobjects.rebean.wi.impl.services.DocumentInstanceManagementServiceImpl.getServer(com.businessobjects.sdk.core.context.IContext, com.businessobjects.rebean.wi.model.engine.IDocumentInstance)
    We have reverted back security patch but still giving above scheduling problem in  BO 4.0 SP04 WebI and we can view and refresh report.
    Is there any way to fix the scheduling problem in BO 4.0 SP04 WebI?

    HI,
    Check SAP notes if they will help you.
    1934855 - Scheduled Web Intelligence documents fail with com.businessobjects.sdk.core.server Error
    1916443 - Scheduling Web Intellignce reports which are having long names to excel and pdf fails.
    1792921 - Unable to schedule Webi documents in Excel or PDF format

  • Function module "GM_DOCUMENT_REVERSE" not found.  after Patch Update

    Hi Abapers/Basis
    After patch update i am not able to do FBCJ reversal entry getting below error message.
    Runtime Errors         CALL_FUNCTION_NOT_FOUND
    Exception              CX_SY_DYN_CALL_ILLEGAL_FUNC
    Date and Time          25.05.2011 14:43:26
    Short text
         Function module "GM_DOCUMENT_REVERSE" not found.
    What happened?
         The function module "GM_DOCUMENT_REVERSE" is called,
         but cannot be found in the library.
         Error in the ABAP Application Program
         The current ABAP program "SAPLRWCL" had to be terminated because it has
         come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
    What can you do?
         Note down which actions and inputs caused the error.
         To process the problem further, contact you SAP system
         administrator.
         Using Transaction ST22 for ABAP Dump Analysis, you can look
         at and manage termination messages, and you can also
    Error analysis
        An exception occurred that is explained in detail below.
        The exception, which is assigned to class 'CX_SY_DYN_CALL_ILLEGAL_FUNC', was
         not caught in
        procedure "CALL_DISPATCHER_STORNO_R" "(FORM)", nor was it propagated by a
         RAISING clause.
        Since the caller of the procedure could not have anticipated that the
        exception would occur, the current program is terminated.
        The reason for the exception is:
        The program "SAPLRWCL" contains the CALL FUNCTION statement.
        The name of the function module to be called is "GM_DOCUMENT_REVERSE".
        No function module exists with the name "GM_DOCUMENT_REVERSE".
        All function modules are listed in the Function Library (SE37).
        Possible reasons:
        a) Wrong name specified. Pay particular attention to
           upper/lower case and underscores ("_").
           or
        b) Transport error
        c) In the case of an enqueue/dequeue module,
           the lock object may not have been activated
           (ABAP/4 Dictionary).
    How to correct the error
        Check the last transports to the SAP System.
        Is the program "SAPLRWCL" currently being changed?
        If an enqueue/dequeue module is involved, is the activation
        of the lock object missing in the ABAP/4 Dictionary?
        If the error occures in a non-modified SAP program, you may be able to
        find an interim solution in an SAP Note.
        If you have access to SAP Notes, carry out a search with the following
        keywords:
        "CALL_FUNCTION_NOT_FOUND" "CX_SY_DYN_CALL_ILLEGAL_FUNC"
        "SAPLRWCL" or "LRWCLF10"
        "CALL_DISPATCHER_STORNO_R"
        Function modules with names similar to "GM_DOCUMENT_REVERSE":
        GM_DOCUMENT_CLOSE
        GM_DOCUMENT_RECORD
        GM_DOCUMENT_DELETE
        GM_DOCUMENT_POST
        GM_DOCUMENT_CHECK
        G_DOCUMENT_RECORD
        GJ_DOCUMENT_RECORD
        GM_DOCUMENT_PROJECT
        GET_DOCUMENTS
        GM_DOCUMENT_DISPLAY
        If you cannot solve the problem yourself and want to send an error
        notification to SAP, include the following information:
    If you cannot solve the problem yourself and want to send an error
    notification to SAP, include the following information:
    1. The description of the current problem (short dump)
       To save the description, choose "System->List->Save->Local File
    (Unconverted)".
    2. Corresponding system log
       Display the system log by calling transaction SM21.
       Restrict the time interval to 10 minutes before and five minutes
    after the short dump. Then choose "System->List->Save->Local File
    (Unconverted)".
    3. If the problem occurs in a problem of your own or a modified SAP
    program: The source code of the program
       In the editor, choose "Utilities->More
    Utilities->Upload/Download->Download".
    Moderator message: please don't just dump your dumps, search for SAP notes or open a call with SAP instead.
    Edited by: Thomas Zloch on May 25, 2011 2:16 PM

    Hi Karthik,
    Thank you for ur reply.
    I did not implement any user exit/ badi. Dump is saying that my smarform function module does not exist in the se37 library.
    I have excuted my form through se38, that time is working fine. When i tried through output type it is going to dump.
    Regards,
    Kusuma.

Maybe you are looking for