Namespace problem in SRM scenario.

Hi Experts,
I am using the RFQ scenario on SRM (Proxy) to PI to RFC.
The scenario is standard SRM Scenario.
The problem is with namespace, coming from SRM Proxy is http://sap.com/xi/SRM/Sourcing/Global
using same message Type on PI, but XML namespace here in PI is different for this message, it is http://sap.com/xi/SAPGlobal/Global
As the namespaces are not matching, the message is in RED.
How I can solve this ?
Study SAP

Hi Vijaykumar,
Thanks for your reply.
But it is standard proxy structure, Is it fine to modify this ?
& it is proxy, so we have to regenerate it in SRM also.
is it fine ?
Study SAP

Similar Messages

Problem in the scenario SOAP to RFC Syn

Hello All,
i developed one scenario for our client and development is same like below link.
http://www.riyaz.net/blog/xipi-consuming-xi-web-services-using-web-dynpro-part-i/technology/sap/6/
when i test the interface iam getting below error, Please tell me do i need to install any patch in Xi server or do i need to implement any note.
My SAP XI server version 3.0 and Service pack:19
2010-07-19 07:24:57     Operation performed     The message has been received by the mail system. Profile: XI URL: http://xxxxxxxxx:50000/MessagingSystem/receive/AFW/XI credential (User): XIISUSER
2010-07-19 07:24:57     Operation performed     With the connection RFC_http: / / sap.com / xi / XI / System. Attempted placement of the message in the queue of requests.
2010-07-19 07:24:57     Operation performed     Message queued dCaution
2010-07-19 07:24:57     Operation performed     The message has been retrieved from the queue dCaution queries.
2010-07-19 07:24:57     Operation performed     The status of the message has been activated on DLNG
2010-07-19 07:24:58     Operation performed     Paper channel: CC_R_RFC
2010-07-19 07:24:58     Operation performed     MP: entering
2010-07-19 07:24:58     Operation performed     MP: processing local module localejbs/RfcAFBean
2010-07-19 07:24:58     Error     MP: exception caught with cause com.sap.engine.services.ejb.exceptions.BaseEJBException: Exception in method process.
2010-07-19 07:24:58     Error     Exceptions occurred for Adapter Framework: Exception in method process.
2010-07-19 07:24:58     Error     The dissemination of the message to the application via RFC_http: / / sap.com / xi / XI / System failed due to com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.RecoverableException: Exception in method process.:
com.sap.engine.services.ejb.exceptions.BaseEJBException: Exception in method Process .. Enabled message "Failed".
2010-07-19 07:24:58     Error     The status of the message has been activated on FAIL
2010-07-19 07:24:58     Error     Return of the synchronous error message to the calling application: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.RecoverableException: Exception in method process.: Com.sap.engine.services.ejb.exceptions.BaseEJBException: Exception method in process ..
Thanks and Regards,
Chinna
Edited by: chinnasapxi on Jul 19, 2010 10:55 AM
Edited by: chinnasapxi on Jul 19, 2010 10:56 AM

Hi Cinna,
>just now i checked the RFC it is working
this together with the header "Problem in the scenario SOAP to RFC Syn" is missunderstoobable. But ok, the error is inside RFC adapter: may be it cannot create the DIAG RFC call with the XML what you provided in RTW.
To be shure to have sent the right XML send a message but use a Message Mapping with RFC module as target.
Regards,
Udo

Implementation costs SuS-SRM scenario (service procurement/web-based)

Hi out there,
I am currently trying to rough-estimate the implemantation costs for a SuS-SRM scenario (service procurement - supplier enablement/web-based) with all the components it requires:
software-wise: SRM with SuS and XI would be needed
Hardware-wise ? (rough estimate)
Consulting fees ? (rough estimate)
Current facts: SAP Enterprise 4.7 in use
Or maybe somebody can refer me to a SAP price list. I have searched high and low with no positive result. A rough estimate would be good enough.
kr
Andre

Dear Emmanuel,
Yes you will not find the Interface mapping after the scenario generation. These SRM scenarios are Proxy communication scenarios and mainly involved with no change in structures.
Regarding the Communication channels, yes you have to create the channels first, before the scenario generation.
The SRM scenarios are mainly used with proxy communication and you have to create channels with adapter type XI.
In your case - the scenario is - Service_Procurement_SupplierEnablement . you have to create two receiver communication channels. this scenario mainly exchanges data between EBP and SUS. the integration happens with the below interfaces-
InvoiceConfirmation_Out, InvoiceRequest_Out, PurchaseOrderRequest_Out, ServiceAcknowledgementConfirmation_Out, SupplierPortalTradingPartner_CreateOrChange_Out , InvoiceRequest_Out etc.
The Video I have uploaded to this link-
http://www.easy-share.com/1913995983/011000358700001939872008E.zip
Please download the same, you need WebX player as it is a .arf file.
Thanks
Sugata B Majumder

Sizing MDM-SRM scenario

Hi,
In MDM 7.1 how many hosts are actually needed to run a MDM-SRM scenario? Do you need all five (import server, syndication server, mdm server, layoutserver and dbms) or is it enough with one mdm server that hosts the whole MDM solution? And if so, does the SRM catalogue require a seperate server, or does it run on the same server as a regular EP server? Im feeling a bit confused in this whole MDM environment thing atm.. please help out

Hi Naim
For answer your question you should provide more information about your plans.
For example:
if you haven't plan to do import master data automatically- import server is not needed
if you haven't plan to do syndicate master data automatically - syndication server is not needed
if you haven't plan to do product catalog - layout server is not needed
Regards
Kanstantsin

Any How-to handle SRM scenarios in BI 7.0

Hi,
BI 7.0 is being implemented for a client.He is trying to use SRM 5.0.Can u provide me some how-to handle SRM scenarios in BW guides or documents please.
Regards,
Joy

Hi ,
I need to retract data from BW-BPS 7.1 to SRM.I am new to BW
(4 months experience)
Can anyone send me documentation , links or steps by steps guide to explain how
to do the link please?
Is it more or less the same as with retraction into CO-Pa?Is there a standard retractor?
If there are no standard retractors, what is the solution?
This a challenging task for me and I really need to do it at work.
Thanks in advance for your help.
I'll surely assign points if one can help me.
My mail is [email protected]
Nevil

How-to handle SRM scenarios in Bi 7.0---any help ???

Hi,
BI 7.0 is being implemented for a client.He is trying to use SRM 5.0.Can u provide me some how-to handle SRM scenarios in BW guides or documents please.
Regards,
Joy

Hi ,
I need to retract data from BW-BPS 7.1 to SRM.I am new to BW
(4 months experience)
Can anyone send me documentation , links or steps by steps guide to explain how
to do the link please?
Is it more or less the same as with retraction into CO-Pa?Is there a standard retractor?
If there are no standard retractors, what is the solution?
This a challenging task for me and I really need to do it at work.
Thanks in advance for your help.
I'll surely assign points if one can help me.
My mail is [email protected]
Nevil

SRM scenario XI / PI requirements

Hi all,
i have a question regarding XI requirements in SRM scenarios. What are the requirements for CLASSIC, EXTENDED CLASSIC, STAND ALONE and DECOUPLED scenarios? Are there standard contents for all of them? I understand that in CLASSIC, the connection of ERP and SRM-EBP is via RFC. Can we use XI instead for the integration to be clear?

Hi
Downlaod SAP SRM SERVER and SRM SERVER IC tpz and import them in IR.
one of these would have the mappings and the other would contain service intrefaces. If you want to make any changes, copy this to a custom and make releavnt changes.
Regards
Monika

[svn] 1313: Fix for the use namespace problems we've been having with ASC ( I hope).

Revision: 1313
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-04-20 09:41:41 -0700 (Sun, 20 Apr 2008)
Log Message:
Fix for the use namespace problems we've been having with ASC (I hope). The problem was that the use directive was being defined after we had called finish package. The UseDirectiveNode has a pkgdef ptr, and does different things depending if that ptr is null or not. It should not be null when the UseDirective is inside the package - but since we were generating the UseDirectiveNode after we had called finishPackage the UseDirectiveNode didn't have it's pkgdef ptr set, and so things went awry as the package didn't get set up with all the correct open namespaces. I haven't tested this in authoring/flex but I am pretty sure that this will fix all the problems we're seeing.
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/parser/Parser.java

Many thanks.
With those symptoms, I'd try the following document:
Apple software on Windows: May see performance issues and blank iTunes Store
(If there's a SpeedBit LSP showing up in Autoruns, it's usually best to just uninstall your SpeedBit Video Accelerator.)

Documatation for SRM scenario Service_Procurement_SupplierEnablement

Hi All,
I am setting the interface between SRM (EBP) and SUS and using the scenario Service_Procurement_SupplierEnablement, so i tried to find some documentation for this, but i didn't find nothing. Somebody knows where can i find it? or What kind of adapter type i have must to use?
Regards,

Dear Emmanuel,
Yes you will not find the Interface mapping after the scenario generation. These SRM scenarios are Proxy communication scenarios and mainly involved with no change in structures.
Regarding the Communication channels, yes you have to create the channels first, before the scenario generation.
The SRM scenarios are mainly used with proxy communication and you have to create channels with adapter type XI.
In your case - the scenario is - Service_Procurement_SupplierEnablement . you have to create two receiver communication channels. this scenario mainly exchanges data between EBP and SUS. the integration happens with the below interfaces-
InvoiceConfirmation_Out, InvoiceRequest_Out, PurchaseOrderRequest_Out, ServiceAcknowledgementConfirmation_Out, SupplierPortalTradingPartner_CreateOrChange_Out , InvoiceRequest_Out etc.
The Video I have uploaded to this link-
http://www.easy-share.com/1913995983/011000358700001939872008E.zip
Please download the same, you need WebX player as it is a .arf file.
Thanks
Sugata B Majumder

Please help with namespace problem

Hello,
I am trying to display a gif image an I have a namespace problem.
Here is my xml document:
<?xml version='1.0'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="authors.xsl"?>
<authors>
<author>
<name>Mike Galos</name>
<nationality>French</nationality>
</author>
<author>
<name>Cynthia Randall</name>
<nationality>Canadian</nationality>
</author>
</authors>
Here is my xsl stylesheet:
<?xml version='1.0'?>
<xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" version="1.0">
<xsl:template match="//author">
<image     xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
               xlink:type="simple"
               xlink:href="logo.gif"
               xlink:show="embed"/>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
I want the browser to diplay the gif image but it is only showing the image icon and not the actual gif image.
Can anyone please help??
Thanks in advance,
Balteo.

do you use a special browser?
if not, do you really expect a standard browser to understand this kind of non-HTML image tag?
<image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:show="embed" xlink:href="logo.gif" xlink:type="simple">check HTML 4.0 (http://www.devguru.com/Technologies/html/quickref/html_img.html)
or XHTML(http://www.devguru.com/Technologies/xhtml/quickref/xhtml_img.html)
for the correct tag syntax.

Workflow Problem between SRM & ECC

Hi,
We are facing a typical scenario in the workflow for Purchase Requisition.
System:
1.     SAP ECC 6.0
2.     SAP SRM 5.0
Problem Description:
1.     In our landscape, ECC is connected to SRM portal for creation of PRs through SRM.
2.     For this the user logs into SRM system and creates a shopping cart. After creation of shopping cart, it goes for approval in SRM system.
3.     Once approved, BAPI 'BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE' used at the SRM backend to create PRs in ECC.
4.     After this, the workflow gets triggered and a work item is being sent for approvals in ECC.
5.     There is an enhancement (ES_SAPLMEWQ) been done in the BAPI u2018BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE' to trigger the workflow.
6.     We have used the standard function module u2018SAP_WAPI_CREATE_EVENTu2019.
7.     Now the problem is that, this is working fine in QAS and Dev systems. But it fails in PRD for some of the SRM triggered PRs.
8.     After our initial analysis, we observed that, for the PRs, it has failed to trigger workflow, the initiator had logged into SRM using FR language where as, those PRs whose initiator had logged into SRM portal using u2018ENu2019 language it had worked fine.

Recently I was facing a similar issue with SAP_WAPI_START_WORKFLOW function module where I did not maintain the container element name in the program with different language. I will request you to maintain the event container element name in France inside the program whefre you are calling the FM SAP_WAPI_CREATE_EVENT. Most probably you will be using Text Symbol that you need to maintain in French language.
Thanks
Arghadip

Namespace-Problem RosettaNet

Hi,
we have a problem bei configuring a RosettaNet-Scenario.
Our partner gets an Error 500 when he sends a Message Type AdvanceShipmentNotificationAction to our XI-system.
In our logs we can find the following entry:
Constructing the object... : Could not find sender agreement for SenderParty=Partner;SenderService=PIP3B2_V0101_Shipper;ReceiverParty=Receiver;ReceiverService=PIP3B2_V0101_Receiver;Interface=AdvanceShipmentNotificationAction;NameSpace=http://sap.com/xi/RosettaNet/V0101.
The problem is the NameSpace. We have configured the NameSpace http://sap.com/xi/RosettaNet/PIP3B2_V0101 becaus the interface is only configured in NameSpace http://sap.com/xi/RosettaNet/PIP3B2_V0101 by the RosettaNet package of SAP. But we got the error that we are using a wrong Namespace.
How does XI determine the NameSpace which has to be used for SenderAgreements in a RosettaNet-Scenario? Does anybody know that?
We don't have any idea how to solve this problem.
I hope anybody can help us.
Best Regards,
Thorsten

You can configure, which namespace you want:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/ed/c49e423d77c46ae10000000a155106/frameset.htm
Regards
Stefan

Namespace problem while updating a desktop app

Hello,
I've searched on a lot of forums but didn't find anything accurate on my problem.
I have an old AIR 2.0 desktop app that updated itself.
I want to update it to the last 3.4 framework. So I followed instructions for the intermediate application to update (between 2.0 and 2.5).
I manage to update from 2.0 to a Air 2.5 intermediate application, while still having the 2.0 namespace in the app descriptor file.
But it is impossible for me to update this 2.5 application (with 2.0 namespace) to a 2.5 namespace !!
Here si my update descriptor file :
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<update xmlns="http://ns.adobe.com/air/framework/update/description/2.5">
           <versionNumber>0.3.2</versionNumber>
           <versionLabel>Version for 0.3.2</versionLabel>
     <url>http://www.mywebsite/app.air</url>
     <description><![CDATA[
Final test
           ]]></description>
</update>
But I'm having the error 16831 : "Application namespace and update.xml namespace are not compatible".
It seems that my application only wants to update to another one with the exact same namespace.
How this can be ?
Thanks !
I must say that I publish to AIR 2.5 with Flash CS5 and flashpro extension for air (in beta version) as Flash CS6 always overwrite the app descriptor while publishing (so it is impossible to change the namespace to 2.0 for example)

Ok, after having searched a lot, I managed to understand what was going on....
To those interested, the update descriptor must stay in a 1.0 namespace until the end of the process.
When all is updated (app namespace to 2.5), you can use the 2.5 update descriptor namespace....

Automatically create a PO from a catalog buy in the classic SRM scenario

All,
We are on SRM SAPK-70207INSRMSRV classic scenario and R3 EHP6 FOR SAP ERP 6.0
When a shopping cart is created and approved from the MDM catalogue we get an automatic purchase requisition. currently the purchasers manually create the purchase order from that purchase requisition but we want to have an automatic purchase order for every all catalogue buy.
is this possible in the classic scenario ?
Can we also assign specific purchasers to these automatically created purchase orders, based on, for instance, the purchasing group as we use vendor invoice management so these purchasers will receive invoices with a price differences.
Thanks as ever.
Antoinette

Hello Antoinette,
A. Stork wrote:
is this possible in the classic scenario ?
Please have a look at below wiki:
Determination of the follow-on document type
A. Stork wrote:
Can we also assign specific purchasers to these automatically created purchase orders, based on, for instance, the purchasing group as we use vendor invoice management so these purchasers will receive invoices with a price differences.
Depending on product responsability and organizational responsability, purchasing group is automatically determined for each SC item.
For those purchasing groups, users are assigned inside the PPOSA_BBP transaction.
So, i do not understand your request.
Regards.
Laurent.

PO creation problem with classic scenario

Hi All,
We are in SRM 7.0 nad have mapped extended classic scenario. Now we want to map the Classic scenario only for a specific company code. So, my question is can we map the classic scenario on company code specific.
I tried maintianing the document type & number ranges in R/3. Maintained the number ranges & transaction type in SRM.
Also implemented BADI BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI.
But after creating the SC the status is "Approved" but no PO getting created in ECC. On observing RZ20 there is an system error for the number ranges.
Please let me know if I am missing some steps.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Abey.

HI,
Make sure the PO number range in ERP is same in SRM. Also have the external checkbox checked for PO number range in ERP.
Also have the same transaction type in SRM and ERP. Where the ERP transaction type should have external number range as the above mentioned profile.
Regards
Sam

Namespace problem in SRM scenario.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for