Narrowing Page Width - Bleed Area

Hello,
I would like to add a bleed area around the website pages that I am developing currently, in order to accommodate people that want to view the site with smaller screens. I am aware of the fact that the website page height and width can obviously be set, but that is not what I want to change.

There is only one good reason for separating pages like this - when the book is wirobound/spiral bound/comb bound (or whatever term fits) but the spirally things instead of a spine or staples.
To the OP - this is completely normal. The print falls outside the trim area - and should be trimmed by the finishers.
If it's an issue then do as posted above.
There's actually a pretty nifty script for this http://in-tools.com/indesign/scripts/freeware/SeparatePages.jsx
http://indesignsecrets.com/how-to-install-scripts-in-indesign.php

Similar Messages

When printing an e-mail, it prints in narrow column - not full page width!

when printing an e-mail, it prints in narrow column - not full page width!
Spacing is also erratic

check the default paper size for your printer on the printers folder in Windows.

Why are my images scrolling from outside the Page width?

Why are my images scrolling from outside the Page width? I am positive i has all the settings correct, to have an image parallax scroll from the edge of the page into the page and out again. But the images are flying in from the browser width - not the page width. This is not the effect I am after.
Any suggestions on how to fix this? Given the key position is only linked to the height, I can't for the life of me work out how to ensure the images start moving from a certain position onthe left and right of the page.
Thanks

I think the effect you are seeing is a result of how the lineHeight is set up. By default, the lineHeight will be calculated as 120% of the size of the largest thing on the line -- in your case, this is the inline graphic. This is designed to leave space between the line before and the line with the graphic. So it is taking the height of the graphic, multiplying by 120%, and making this the distance between the previous line and the line with the graphic. So the bigger the graphic, the bigger the space above the graphic. Normally this works well with text, but in this case you may want to get closer to "set solid". You can do this by setting the lineHeight to 100%. Or you may wish to leave a couple of percent for the descenders of the previous line. Or, another alternative that may work well for you if you really know exactly where you want the line set, you could measure the graphic, add on the number of extra pixels to leave for the descenders, and make the lineHeight a constant. So you could do something like this:
<img lineHeight="104%" height="411"/>
or this:
<img lineHeight="423" height="411"/>
Obviously you would still need to specify the source and any other parameters you want on the image.
Note that if you are trying to fit a 200 pixel high graphic into a 200 pixel high container, you will hit the same problem -- in order to fit the graphic, the container will have to be slightly bigger than the graphic in order to fit the descenders on the last line. This is true even if the last line contains only the graphic, and no descenders (or text) at all.
Hope this helps,
- robin

Indesign wrong Bleed Area in PDF

Hi,
I'm going to publish a book through a book-on-demand online service and I wanted some informations because I think there are problems with my Bleed Area in the PDF's exported from Indesign.
My book is about 190 pages in A4, so I set its dimensions to 210 mm x 297 mm, with a Bleed Area on each side of 3,175 mm as stated on the online website.
Since my background should extend on each side and I don't want white borders to appear on the page sides during the print, I extended the background to the bleed area, as the following picture (my facing pages master):
When I export my book I get a strange result. Basically some pages have the inner bleed, that should contain the background I extended, totally white. Others, instead, have the copy of a part of the beginning of the previous page. Like this picture:
This page is a new chapter, a new document of my indesign book. As you can see the bleed area on the left doesn't contains the background I extended but its white. Same happens with other pages, like the one of the chapter ending.
Next you find the image of a common page in my book, as you can see the bleed area is fulled with the beginning of the background of another page.
This is the PDF i get when exporting. I think something is wrong.
I really need a lot of help on this, since I put much efforts in this project I would like to understand what I'm doing wrong now!
Thanks a lot for any help!
Marcello

Are you getting the white edge on every second page? Are you printing to Postscript and distilling, or printing direct to PDF, or Exporting the PFD?
Your exported PDF looks exactly as it should. On an inside bleed, the bleed area is the edge of the opposite page in the spread if one is present. I'm guessing you need the inside bleed for perfect binding, and you have two choices, in my opinion. First would be to split the spreads and extend the art into the bleed area (see InDesignSecrets » Blog Archive » Breaking Pages Apart to Bleed Off a Spine) and setting an inside bleed value. The other, probably easier, option for this document would be to set the inside bleed to 0, turn on layout adjustment, and then set the page width and inside margins wider by the amount of the inside bleed that you need. Add some manual crop marks, and a ruler guide to show you where the trim should really be.

Safari Full Screen Page Width Customization Feature Missing

Let me explain the title.
In the previous Safari version, when you were in Full Screen viewing mode, you were able to set the width of the webpage you're browsing by hovering the mouse on either left or right edge of the screen, then clicking and dragging the cursor towards the center to set the width for the webpage. Now, in the latest version, this feature seems to be gone.
Now, why would you need this feature, you ask? Simple: some webpages, such as Wikipedia, are coded to always use the browser's full viewing width, thus making the paragraphs really really wide. The problem is that the human eye will have dificulty reading those really wide lines of texts, especially if they're huge paragraphs. Narrower paragraph widths are much easier to read. You can actually test this by viewing a Wikipedia page NOT in the Full Screen mode by comparing a wide Safari window compared to a narrower one. (This is actually the reason why they use narrow text collumns in news papers; easier to read.)
Apple, PLEASE bring that feature back. I don't for the life of me understand why you keep making inferior upgrades to a lot of your products: the Preview app (no more loop when viewing pictures in Full Screen Presentation mode), MacBook Pro Retina & iMacs & Apple Cinema Displays (no Anti-GLARE option) …

I have to agree that it was a very useful feature.
A very smart browser it was...

Changing page width with template

I'm trying to create a wedding website in iWeb using one of the templates. I don't like the narrow "Apple" look so I tried to adjust it to 1000px. I found the Page inspector/Layout box and changed the page width easily enough but it looked terrible because there didn't seem to be a way to alter the background images in the template.
After a lot of poking around online, I found instructions for duplicating and then altering an iWeb template. I went into it and changed all the images to 1000p. I thought that had solved the problem since it looks great in iWeb. But when I published it, it looks terrible. It seems like it's finding the old 700px images somewhere. Check it out: http://web.me.com/kamoore63/Wedding_Website/Home.html
Does anyone have any ideas what files or things I might have to change to have this appear correctly?

Welcome to the Apple Discussions. Publish the site to a folder on the desktop and check the files in there to see if the older narrow files are there. If so you probably will have to do a Publish Entire Site to totally replace all of the files on the server.
What you're experiencing is why many recommend starting with either the white or black theme and crating your own layout. Editing the theme itself can be hit or miss and the theme may not stay changed thru an subsequent update of the application.
OT

Setting different pages widths in different sections - Pages 5.2

In Pages 5.2, how does one set different page widths (margins) in different sections?

You can't. Margins apply to the entire document.
What you can do is set the margins to their max width and then use left and right indents for the sections you want narrower.
Peter

Auto adjustment of page orientation causes printing issues with documents that have a page width greater than its page height.

Hi,
Since an upgrade from Word 2003 to Word 2010, we are experiencing printing issues with certain
documents that have a page width greater than its page height.
In Word 2003, it was no problem to set the page width greater than the page height while setting the page orientation to "portrait".
In Word 2010, this seems impossible: despite leaving the page orientation to "portrait", if one changes the page width/height as stated,
Word 2010 automatically adjusts the orientation to "landscape". Resetting the orientation to "portrait" will flip the page's width/heigth settings.
This behaviour causes printing problems: the page prints out 90° rotated.
I do not believe this is a printer driver issue: I tried several different printer drivers, and all give the same (bad) result. Setting the printer driver's page orientation settings (before printing) makes no difference, as
Word 2010 seems to force the page orientation settings.
Inserting the documents 90° rotated is not an option, since it causes problems with the printing margins.
This is very annoying, since we have to print official documents of a municipality (driver's licences).
Is there a workaround for this issue?
Regards,
Laurent Grandgaignage
Sysadmin Gemeentebestuur Stabroek, Belgium

Hi
Thank you for using
Microsoft Office for IT Professionals Forums.
From your description, we can follow these steps to test this issue
Step 1: Repair Office 2010
1.
Click
Start, and then click Control Panel.
2.
Click
Programs and Features.
3.
Click the
Office 2010 program that you want to repair, and then click
Change.
4.
Click
Repair, and then click Continue. You might need to restart your computer after the repair is complete.
Step 2:
Rename the global template (Normal.dotm)Follow the steps for the operating system that you are using:
Windows Vista and Windows 7
a)
Exit Word 2010
b)
Click
Start.
c)
In the
Start Search box, type the following text, and then press
ENTER:
1.
%userprofile%\appdata\roaming\microsoft\templates
d)
Right-click
Normal.dotm, and then click Rename.
e)
Type
Oldword.old, and then press ENTER.
Microsoft Windows XP
a)
Exit Word 2010
b)
Click
Start, and then click Run.
c)
In the
Open box, type the following text, and then press ENTER:
%userprofile%\Application Data\Microsoft\Templates
d)
Right-click
Normal.dotm, and then click Rename.
e)
Type
Oldword.old, and then press ENTER.
f)
Close Windows Explorer.
How to troubleshoot print failures in Word 2010, Word 2007, and Word 2003
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/826845
Please take your time to try the suggestions and let me know the results at your earliest convenience. If anything is unclear or if there is anything
I can do for you, please feel free to let me know.
Hope that helps.
Sincerely
William Zhou CHNPlease remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.

How do I set Page Width to Multiple Pages?

How do I set Page Width to Multiple Pages?
I notice when Cross Tabs are used, the report spans over several pages in width. Can I set this option without using a cross-tab? Since I am having trouble finding a paper width that is 100 inches wide, I was thinking of just using multiple pages.
Thanks,
Linda

Hi Linda,
Try inserting an OLEDB object and select a bitmap and insert a blank bitmap in report header. Now go to preview and right click on OLEDB Object go to format graphic>picture>change the width of the picture
If the width exceeds more than the width of the page then it create virtual pages.
Hope this helps!
Raghavendra

Displaying linked pages in an area of the screen, using CSS?

Imagine that I have a column on the left of the page that has a list of links to other pages. When you click on any of those links, then to the right the linked page is shown.
I know how to do this with frames, but I'm trying to figure this one out using CSS.
Can anyone point me in the right direction?
Below is a code sample that if your save and then view in a browser will show you (hopefully) what I am trying to achieve.
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />

<title>Test site</title>
<style type="text/css">

div.header {
height:4em;
width:auto;
border:0;
padding:0;
text-align:center;
background-color:#6CF;
div.sidebar {
width: 15em;
float:left;
text-align: left;
border-bottom:0px;
padding-top: 1em;
padding-right: 1em;
padding-bottom: 1em;
padding-left: 0em;
    background-color:#390
div.footer {
width:auto;
border:0;
padding:0;
text-align:center;
background-color:#6CF
-->
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div class="header">
   header goes here
</div>
<div class="sidebar">

   Link to page 1<br />
   Link to page 2<br />
   Link to page 3<br />
   etc...<br />
</div>

This is the area where the pages linked to should be displayed.<br />
So, if you click on the "Link to page 1" link, to the left, the contents of page 1 will be shown here.<br />
If you click on the link to the left that says "Link to page 2" then the contents of page 2 will be shown here, etc.<br clear="left" />
<div class="footer">
footer goes here
</div>
</body>
</html>

Thank you Nancy! Your solution is (I believe) 99% of the way to being exactly what I want.
The code fragment below:
<div class="sidebar">

   <a href="../Test/About.html" target="Frame1"> About</a><p>
   <a href="../Test/FAQ.html" target="Frame1"> FAQ</a><p>
   <a href="../Test/Contact.html" target="Frame1"> Contact us</a><p>
</div>
<iframe name="Frame1" id="Frame1" src="../Test/About.html" height="auto" width="auto" allowtransparency="true" border="0" margin="0" scrolling="auto" > </iframe>
but I want the window that contains the 'imported' code to expand to be the same height as the sidebar and wide enough to stretch to the rightmost side of the visible screen.
I was guessing that
height="auto" width="auto"
would have done the trick, but it would seem not. Any ideas?

Reporting Services - Horizontal Scrollbar not scrolling sometimes fields exceed page width

We have a landscape report with lots of fields, causing report to span in width, more than page width. We don't print the report, just view it. Problem is that sometimes when previewing the report, the horizontal scroll bar opens to a size of the whole report
window and there's no actual scrolling functionality to have the report show what's to the right of the data shown.
We checked this with IE8, IE9, and as it seems there are entries on the internet about such problem, but we haven't encounted an entry with solution / bypass to this problem, when relating to preview within report builder / VS / Reporting Services in
IE (they relate there only to reportviewer control if at all).
We did find that in this event, manually zooming the IE window where the report result is shown, helps the horizontal scroll bar go back to what it should be, and work, e.g. zooming down to 75% and returning in zoom up to 100%....
Can you please advise ? Thank u

Hi moital,
Just as you said, I still think the issue is caused by Internet Explorer. We can try to
run IE in
compatibility mode or
disable third party add-ons
of Internet Explorer (IE) to check the issue again. If this issue
is still existed, I suggestion you post the question in the following forum:http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/ie/en-US/home?category=internetexplorer.
It is appropriate and more experts will assist you.
Thank you for your understanding and support.
Regards,
Katherine Xiong
Katherine Xiong
TechNet Community Support

Cannot adjust page width to fit to screen size on some PCs with IE

Hello friends, I am using APEX 4.0 and IE9 on different Windows 7 PCs . The page will go way off the screen to the right on one PC, and fits nicely inside the screen on another PC. This problem does not occur in Firefox on any PC. I have used Firebug to try to isolate the template or css settings. Using Theme_4, I have a breadcrumb region and 4 reports regions. One of the reports regions is in column 1 and 3 regions are in column 2. Display point is Page Template Body (3. Items above region content) for all the reports regions. The CSS is #themes/theme_4/css/theme_4_0.css. The template is One Level Tabs (Right Sidebar/Table Based). I tried various width="" using px and % under Edit Page Template-Definition-Body (see below). I tried style="width:800px" within the <div> tags. I have tried various other changes to theme_4_0.css and apex_4_0.css with no visible change to the page width on the obstinate PCs. I reset IE setting and deleted all personal settings on both PCs with no changes to either one, one fits on the screen and the other does not. The issue is that most of our users use IE so most of them will have to live with using the horizontal scroll bar to see the regions in column 2, unless we switch them all to Firefox (not a bad option, except that option works for our users only, we have no control over external browsers). I have tried suggestions from many discussion threads, as this problem has bothered us for quite some time. I know this is an IE problem, but any help is appreciated. Thank you.
"|" represents screen size and "-" is the regions/content for the "bad" PCs.
|----------|----------
The "good" PCs look like this:
|----------|
Peter
<div id="body">
<table class="tbl-body" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" summary="">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="tbl-main" width="100%">#REGION_POSITION_02##BOX_BODY#</td>
<td class="tbl-sidebar">#REGION_POSITION_03#</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>

BD...
I think your concerns are very reasonable. But I want to sort of refocus things a little bit for you here... it's not really a PC vs Mac issue... Rather, it's specifically an Internet Explorer issue. And you might say that this is synonymous...still 98% of the world uses IE, and you would be correct. Hopefully when the final version of IE7 comes out, it will finally embrace some of the modern day OPEN web standards without trying to make too many standards of its own (this is Microsoft, though).
Anyways, in the meantime, I guess we all try to make the best of it. It's very easy to conclude that iWeb is not a viable tool for you, as long as you have something else to "fall back" on. With my limited knowledge of all things HTML, I have no such luxury. Instead, I have put up a notice on my site for IE users only that the site might not look its best on IE....this notice also encourages IE users to use FireFox, which is very much like Safari and will in 99% of cases display your iWeb pages just like you expect. You can see how I've done this here (but you have to surf from IE)... http://blog.dirtdoog.com
I think many people in the PC world understand the limitations of IE. Certainly many don't, but you have to consider your likely audience, I guess. I believe that your website content is king. If your content is compelling enough to your intended audience, they will jump through hoops to see it in its full glory....but you have to make them aware of the problem. That's why I have chosen to take the path that I have taken.
Let me know what you think.

Bleed Areas and PDF Export

I set my book up in indesign and have all the bleed areas marked out. When i export to a pdf it comes out fine, but when i export to a pdf using the documents bleed settings i get an issue.
On the two pages facing each other the inside edge of each page is switched with the page next to it. so on each page i have a strip of the image from the left page on the right page and vice versa.
What am i doing wrong? Indesign is pretty new to me and I havent been able to figure out what is causing this

There's no harm in that at all. As the image falls outside the crop area. IT should be trimmed off when printed anyway.
Usually the prepress will impose the file and it sort of sits in a container where the bleed wouldn't be visible on that edge anyway. And even if it is it's going into the spine. The chances of it appearing in the final printed piece is extremely slim.
However, you can combat this by File>Export>PDF and go to the Marks and Bleeds - untick the Link button for the bleed and change the inside bleed to 0.
Now you won't have any bleed on the inside pages.

Help with page width

Hi Guys,
I was hoping you could help me. This is my page width in dreamweaver.
And now here's my site in Firefox.
Does anyone know how to fix this?
Many thanks

Page width should be defined in your CSS code. Below are some examples of centered, fixed-width CSS Layouts.
View source in browser to see the code.
Basic 1-col layout
http://alt-web.com/TEMPLATES/Basic-1-col-fixed.shtml
Basic 2-col layout
http://alt-web.com/TEMPLATES/2-col-fixed-layout.shtml
Basic 3-col layout
http://alt-web.com/TEMPLATES/3-col-970.shtml
Nancy O.
Alt-Web Design & Publishing
Web | Graphics | Print | Media Specialists
http://alt-web.com/
http://twitter.com/altweb

Problem with increasing page width

Hi,
When I try to increase iWeb page width from 684px to 900px, there is an unexpected redundant white area at the bottom right corner of the page.
Please see the screenshot here:
http://img223.imageshack.us/img223/7244/screenshot20090713at600.png
I know that I can remove the "Color Fill" in Inspector. However, I want to keep it!
What should I do to remove that redundant white area?
Thank you!
Message was edited by: Rosydream
Message was edited by: Rosydream

Rosydream ~ If you're happy with so many application icons in your Dock, there's no need to read on...
The Dock on your Mac's Desktop looks very crowded such that each small icon is perhaps difficult to identify. If you’d like to reduce the number of applications from the Dock, you can do so at any time. Simply grab the icon of the document, folder, or application you’d like to remove, and drag it out of the Dock. Release the mouse button, and the item will vanish in a puff of virtual smoke:
...Or you can Control-click an icon and choose +"Remove from Dock"+. Remaining, frequently used icons in the Dock will then be larger and more easily identifiable, and removed applications will still be available in the Applications folder. For an example of how the Dock can look on a 15" MB Pro, click on this thumbnail:
If you later start an application you've removed from the Dock, you can Control-click its icon in the Dock and choose +Keep in Dock+. You can read more about the Dock here:
_Mac 101: The Dock_.

Narrowing Page Width - Bleed Area

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for