NAT and AOL

Heres my problem
My BM 3.8 server has an IP address of xxx.xxx.xxx.236
My GroupWise servers Public IP address is xxx.xxx.xxx.227
I have Nat set up on the BM 3.8 server [xxx.xxx.xxx.236] and have
xxx.xxx.xxx.227 added in the NAT table
When someone receives an email from us the header is showing
xxx.xxx.xxx.236 as the Originating IPAOL kicks it back because it does
not match up with the our A record
[ERROR]
xxx.xxx.xxx.236 PTR record: mail.xxxxxx.net. [TTL 3600s]
[A=xxx.xxx.xxx.227] *ERROR* A record does not point back to original IP.
What do I need to do so the e-mail shows its coming from the GroupWise
server [xxx.xxx.xxx.227] not the BM Server [xxx.xxx.xxx.236]
Thanks, D

Network Address Translation
Network Interface: PUBLIC
Interface Group:
Status: Static and Dynamic
Network Address Translation Table: (Select to View or Modify)
Network Address Translation Table
Public Address Private Address
XX.XX.XX.227 10.4.55.20
XX.XX.XX.241 10.4.55.29
Secondary IP Address Configuration
Network Interface: PUBLIC
Secondary IP Address Status: Enabled
Secondary IP Address List on this Interface: (Select to View or Modify)
Secondary IP Address List
IP Address Arpable
XX.XX.XX.227 Yes
XX.XX.XX.241 Yes
TCP/IP Protocol Configuration
TCP/IP Status: Enabled
IP Packet Forwarding: Enabled("Router")
RIP: Enabled
OSPF: Disabled
OSPF Configuration: (Select to View or Modify)
LAN Static Routing: Enabled
LAN Static Routing Table: (Select For List)
Dead Gateway Detection: Disabled
Dead Gateway Detection Configuration: (Select to View or Modify)
SNMP Manager Table: (Select For List)
DNS Resolver Configuration: (Select to View or Modify)
Load Balancing: Disabled
Load Balancing Configuration: (Select to View or Modify)
Fault Tolerance: Enabled
Fault Tolerance Configuration: (Select to View or Modify)
Outbound VIPA Support: Disabled
Default IP Address: 0.0.0.0
Filter Support: Enabled
NAT Implicit Filtering: Disabled
Expert Configuration Options: (Select to View or Modify)

Similar Messages

How do I add an iCloud account to my "Messages" if the only options it gives me when I click "Add Account" is Google, Yahoo, and AOL?

I want to add another I cloud account to my Messages, But when I Click add account, the only options it gives me is Gmail, Yahoo, and AOL. But I have an iCloud.com email. What do I do in this case ?

Hi rarellano1,
In order to have an iCloud account available for the Messages application it must first be set up in System Preferences > Internet Accounts. If this is a second (or later) iCloud account, it will not have Messages available. See this article for details -
OS X Yosemite: Change iCloud feature settings
Thanks for using Apple Support Communities.
Sincerely,
Brett L

I want to use Back to my mac. When I try to turn it on, it says "Back to My Mac may be slow because more than one device on your network is providing network services. Turn off NAT and DHCP on one of the devices and try again." How do I fix this?

Not sure if I am doing this right. This is my first time in the support community.
I imagine what I put in my heading was supposed to go in here.
I want to use Back to my mac. When I try to turn it on, it says "Back to my mac may be slow because more than one device on your network is providing network services. Turn off NAT and DHCP on one of the devices and try again. See the documentation that came with your device for information about turning off network services"
Does anyone know how I do this? I contacted my ISP (Telus in Canada) and they did not know anything (not that they usually do).

Why do ISPs insist upon making things so difficult for their customers?
If you cannot get them to understand that you would prefer to use your own router over their piece of cheap junk, perhaps the information in the following will be useful:
http://keithbalomben.wordpress.com/2012/03/29/telus-actiontec-v1000h-hacks-and-i nformation/
Scroll down to DHCP Settings
You will need to log in with proper "technician" credentials. They are provided in the above link as
Username: tech
Password: t3lu5tv
... but these may or may not work. Try it, and if you cannot get anywhere at least now you know what to ask Telus to do in return for your business.

I set up my iCloud account on iPad with an exchange account and aol account. I can see exchange and aol emails but not those from .me account or apple email. I got it to show all 3 accounts on my iPhone with no problem. Hat am I missing?

I set up my iCloud account on iPad with an exchange account and aol account. I can see exchange and aol emails but not those from .me account or apple email. I got it to show all 3 accounts on my iPhone with no problem. Hat am I missing?

I'm having a similar problem, but I do have the key and is not working anyway.
My old pc was running on windows 7 and my new one is an apple running on Lion.
My phone is an Iphone IV and I can see all the bookmarks there.
In order to sync, what I did was click on the "I don't have the device with me", I entered the key that was provided and the process finish ok. It says congratulations, etc, etc.
But the bookmarks are not there, I tried merging data and replacing data on this computer options but is the same.
Any suggestions?

Using modem Sagem f@st 3464 (Scarlet One : vdsl tv VoIP wi-fi) : impossible to create a new Wi-Fi network (2.4 or 5 GHz) ? Conflict with DHCP / NAT and so on. No answer from the Apple help desk, Air Port Utility 6.1 unusable (configuration = Win 7)

Good afternoon,
My internet connection is delivered by a modem Sagem f@st 3464 (Scarlet One : vdsl tv VoIP wi-fi), it's almost the same than a BBox-2 from Belgacom (software and configuration).
This modem has 4 ethernet port, 2 for TV, 2 for LAN, the WAN port is RJ-11 and the connection is a PPPoE (in fact, it's the Belgacom network). I also got a Wi-Fi 802.11g on it.
The main raison why I bought a TC is the dual Wi-Fi 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz (for 802.11n), especially for my MacBook Pro and my iPad 3.
First of all, can I do the following with my TC :
1) connecting the TC using a ethernet cable from one of the two modem's LAN ports to the TC's WAN port
2) create a new Wi-Fi network using the TC ?
Up to now, after 2 man days of configuration, my TC is connected to my existing LAN network, as a bridge, but there is no new Wi-Fi network.
The Airport Utility 6.1 "Wizard" is just un-usable and I need to use a Win 7 laptop in order to get access to all the configuration !
The standard manual is very poor.
Does someone already create a new Wi-Fi network using its TC connected by Ethernet on a modem/router device ? How do you set up the DHCP (and NAT) ? Which range did you use ?
Sincerely yours,
AVDB

1) connecting the TC using a ethernet cable from one of the two modem's LAN ports to the TC's WAN port
2) create a new Wi-Fi network using the TC ?
Does someone already create a new Wi-Fi network using its TC connected by Ethernet on a modem/router device ? How do you set up the DHCP (and NAT) ? Which range did you use ?
This is easy enough to do..
Plug the TC directly into a computer.. without other connections to do the setup.
Using the newly installed 5.6 utility.
Bridge the TC.
Create a wireless network.
This is an older screen shot and I would set security to WPA2 Personal only not WPA/WPA2 Personal as shown above.
I do recommend you use wireless names that are short, no spaces, pure alphanumeric.
Update the TC..
Now plug it into the modem router.. it will be a part of the network without doing NAT and DHCP itself.. which you do not want.. that leads to double NAT issues.. but it is a WAP that provides access to devices on both 2.4ghz and 5ghz bands directly to the main router.

Howto: Zones in private subnets using ipfilter's NAT and Port forwarding

This setup supports the following features:
* Requires 1 Network interface total.
* Supports 1 or more public ips.
* Allows Zone to Zone private network traffic.
* Allows internet access from the global zones.
* Allows direct (via ipfilter) internet access to ports in non-global zones.
(change networks to suit your needs, the number of public and private ip was lowered to simplify this doc)
Network setup:
iprb0 65.38.103.1/24
defaultrouter 65.38.103.254
iprb0:1 192.168.1.1/24 (in global zone)
Create a zone on iprb0 with an ip of 192.168.1.2
### Example /etc/ipf/ipnat.conf
# forward from a public port to a private zone port
rdr iprb0 65.38.103.1/32 port 2222 -> 192.168.1.2 port 22
# force outbound zone traffic thru a certain ip address
# required for mail servers because of reverse lookup
map iprb0 192.168.1.2/32 -> 65.38.103.1/32 proxy port ftp ftp/tcp
map iprb0 192.168.1.2/32 -> 65.38.103.1/32 portmap tcp/udp auto
map iprb0 192.168.1.2/32 -> 65.38.103.1
# allow any 192.168.1.x zone to use the internet
map iprb0 192.168.1.0/24 -> 0/32 proxy port ftp ftp/tcp
map iprb0 192.168.1.0/24 -> 0/32 portmap tcp/udp auto
map iprb0 192.168.1.0/24 -> 0/32For testing purposes you can leave /etc/ipf/ipf.conf empty.
Be aware the you must "svcadm disable ipfilter; svcadm enable ipfilter" to reload rules and the rules stay loaded if they are just disabled(bug).
Zones can't modify their routes and inherit the default routes of the global zone. Because of this we have to trick the non-global zones into using a router that doesn't exist.
Create /etc/init.d/zone_route_hack
Link this file to /etc/rc3.d/S99zone_route_hack.
#/bin/sh
# based on information found at
# http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/edp?entry=using_branded_zones_on_a
# http://forum.sun.com/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=75669&messageID=275741
fake_router=192.168.1.254
public_net=65.38.103.0
router=`netstat -rn | grep default | grep -v " $fake_router " | nawk '{print $2}'`
# send some data to the real network router so we look up it's arp address
ping -sn $router 1 1 >/dev/null
# record the arp address of the real router
router_arp=`arp $router | nawk '{print $4}'`
# delete any existing arp address entry for our fake private subnet router
arp -d $fake_router >/dev/null
# assign the real routers arp address to our fake private subnet router
arp -s $fake_router $router_arp
# route our private subnet through our fake private subnet router
route add default $fake_router
# Can't create this route until the zone/interface are loaded
# Adjust this based on your hardware and number of zones
sleep 300
# Duplicate this line for every non-global zone with a private ip that
# will have ipfilter rdr (redirects) pointing to it
route add -net $public_net 192.168.1.2 -ifaceNow we have both public and private ip addresses on our one iprb0 interface. If we'd really like our private zone network to really be private we don't want any non-NAT'ed 192.168.1.x traffic leaving the interface. Since ipfilter can't block traffic between zones because they use loopbacks we can just block the 192.168.1.x traffic and the zones can still talk.
The following /etc/ipf/ipf.conf defaults to deny.
# ipf.conf
# IP Filter rules to be loaded during startup
# See ipf(4) manpage for more information on
# IP Filter rules syntax.
# INCOMING DEFAULT DENY
block in all
block return-rst in proto tcp all
# two open ports one of which is redirected in ipnat.conf
pass in quick on iprb0 proto tcp from any to any port = 22 flags S keep state keep frags
pass in quick on iprb0 proto tcp from any to any port = 2222 flags S keep state keep frags
# INCOMING PING
pass in quick on iprb0 proto icmp from any to 65.38.103.0/24 icmp-type 8 keep state
# INCOMING GLOBAL ZONE UNIX TRACEROUTE FIX PART 1
#pass in quick on iprb0 proto udp from any to 65.38.103.0/24 keep state
# OUTGOING RULES
block out all
# ALL INTERNAL TRAFFIC STAYS INTERNAL (Zones use non-filtered loopback)
# remove/edit as needed to actually talk to local private physical networks
block out quick from any to 192.168.0.0/16
block out quick from any to 172.16.0.0/12
block out quick from any to 10.0.0.0/8
block out quick from any to 0.0.0.0/8
block out quick from any to 127.0.0.0/8
block out quick from any to 169.254.0.0/16
block out quick from any to 192.0.2.0/24
block out quick from any to 204.152.64.0/23
block out quick from any to 224.0.0.0/3
# Allow traffic out the public interface on the public address
pass out quick on iprb0 from 65.38.103.1/32 to any flags S keep state keep frags
# OUTGOING PING
pass out quick on iprb0 proto icmp from 65.38.103.1/32 to any icmp-type 8 keep state
# Allow traffic out the public interface on the private address (needs nat and router arp hack)
pass out quick on iprb0 from 192.168.1.0/24 to any flags S keep state keep frags
# OUTGOING PING
pass out quick on iprb0 proto icmp from 192.168.1.0/24 to any icmp-type 8 keep state
# INCOMING TRACEROUTE FIX PART 2
#pass out quick on iprb0 proto icmp from 65.38.103.1/32 to any icmp-type 3 keep stateIf you want incoming and outgoing internet in your zones it is easier if you just give them public ips and setup a firewall in the global zone. If you have limited public ip address(I'm setting up a colocation 1u server) then you might take this approach. One of the best things about doing thing this way is that any software configured in the non-global zones will never be configured to listen on an ip address that might change if you change public ips.

Instead of using the script as a legacy_run script, set it up in SMF.
First create the file /var/svc/manifest/system/ip-route-hack.xml with
the following
---Start---
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE service_bundle SYSTEM
"/usr/share/lib/xml/dtd/service_bundle.dtd.1">

<service_bundle type='manifest' name='NATtrans:ip-route-hack'>
<service
name='system/ip-route-hack'
type='service'
version='1'>
<create_default_instance enabled='true' />
<single_instance />
<dependency
name='physical'
grouping='require_all'
type='service'
restart_on='none'>
<service_fmri value='svc:/network/physical:default' />
</dependency>
<dependency
name='loopback'
grouping='require_all'
type='service'
restart_on='none'>
<service_fmri value='svc:/network/loopback:default' />
</dependency>
<exec_method
type='method'
name='start'
exec='/lib/svc/method/svc-ip-route-hack start'
timeout_seconds='0' />
<property_group name='startd' type='framework'>
<propval name='duration' type='astring'
value='transient' />
</property_group>
<stability value='Unstable' />
<template>
<common_name>
<loctext xml:lang='C'>
Hack to allow zone to NAT translate.
</loctext>
</common_name>
<documentation>
<manpage
title='zones'
section='1M'
manpath='/usr/share/man' />
</documentation>
</template>
</service>
</service_bundle>
---End---
then modify /var/svc/manfiest/system/zones.xml and add the following
dependancy
---Start---
<dependency
name='inet-ip-route-hack'
type='service'
grouping='require_all'
restart_on='none'>
<service_fmri value='svc:/system/ip-route-hack' />
</dependency>
---End---
Finally create the file /lib/svc/method/svc-ip-route-hack with the
contents of S99zone_route_hack, minus the sleep timer (perms 0755). Run
'svccfg import /var/svc/manifest/system/ip-route-hack.xml' and 'svccfg
import /var/svc/manifest/system/zones.xml'.
This will guarantee that ip-route-hack is run before zones are started,
but after the interfaces are brought on line. It is worth noting that
zones.xml may get overwritten during a patch, so if it suddenly stops
working, that could be why.

Static NAT and same IP address for two interfaces

We have a Cisco ASA 5520 and in order to conserve public IP addresses and configuration (possibly) can we use the same public IP address for a static NAT with two different interfaces? Here is an example of what I'm refering too where 10.10.10.10 would be the same public IP address.
static (inside,Outside) 10.10.10.10 access-list inside_nat_static_1
static (production,Outside) 10.10.10.10 access-list production_nat_static_1
Thanks for any help.
Jeff

Hi Jeff,
Unfortunately this cannot be done, on the ASA packet classification is done on the basis of mac-address, destination nat and route, and here you are confusing the firewall, to which interface does the ip belong to. I haven't ever tried to do it, but it should cause you issues.
Thanks,
Varun Rao
Security Team,
Cisco TAC

NAT and Routed Network with Two ISP's on one router

I'm sure this has been done covered many times, but I am not finding it.
I have two ISP connections.
With ISP-A I have a /30 between us and 200.100.100.0/24 is routed to me via the /30 for thsi example we will say the /30 is 1.1.1.1 on isp end and 1.1.1.2 on my end
With ISP-B I have a 100.0.0.0/29 subnet. and the ISP gateway is on that subnet at 100.0.0.1
On the inside of my network I have devices using both 200.100.100.x addresses and devices on 192.168.100.x that need to use NAT.
I would like all of the devices on 200.100.100.x addresses to continue using ISP-A as their gateway.
Everything on 192.168.100.x should use NAT and go out ISP-B
I have tried
ip nat inside source route-map ISP-A interface GigabitEthernet0/1 overload
route-map ISP-B permit 10
match ip address 101
match interface GigabitEthernet0/1
set ip next-hop 100.0.0.1
route-map ISP-A permit 10
match ip address 111
match interface Multilink1
set ip next-hop 1.1.1.1
The problem comes when I have default routes to ISP-A in the router than none of the ISP-B traffic works, and vice versa.

I think for this to work correctly and be able to split traffic between the 2 ISPs, you would need to use BGP, because default is going to use one ISP or the other.
If you can use BGP, this link will help you in load shearing between multiple ISPs when you have one router.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/border-gateway-protocol-bgp/13762-40.html#conf4
HTH

FMS: NAT and Firewall

I've run into one roadblock after another with Cirrus (Stratus) - basically, even the Adobe Videophone example refuses to work in the 'real world' where there's a mix of NAT and firewall configurations outside the developer's control. (http://forums.adobe.com/message/1064983#1064983 and thread at http://forums.adobe.com/thread/736422?tstart=0)
My question is whether Flash Media Server 4 has the same sort of issues? We don't want to pay up to install and run our own FMS only to discover that we won't be able to provide a P2P service to our end users because they're scattered around the Internet with a mix of mobile devices and computers lying behind NAT and firewall devices that we can't predict.

FMS4 and Cirrus should behave identically as far as facilitating P2P communications on the open Internet.
as the referenced article describes, with some combinations of NATs and firewalls, P2P communication is impossible. RTMFP tries really hard to establish connections in the cases where direct communication is possible, but will not function in cases where direct communication is not possible.
we believe direct communications should be possible for the majority of Internet users, but recognize that it won't be possible for 100% of users.

Airport Extreme best practice configuration for Sleep Proxy, DHCP/NAT and PPPOE

Hi
I have recently bought a Airport Extreme and it is working well. One of the reasons I bought is to take advantage of the Bonjour Sleep Proxy on it so I can wake my MAC up remotely from my iPad using the REMOTE app to stream things like iTunes etc... I followed the set up instructions and basically let it configure itself. I have an ISP router / modem which currently is providing DHCP services, NAT and PPPOE.
The Airport detected all of this and set itself up as bridge only. The speed of the network outo to the internet is fine (more or less what it was before). However, in doing a bit of research, I have found out that if I want the Airport to act as a sleep proxy, I need it to "host" the network. I am not an expert in networking but from what I understand I need the Airport to be moved from "Bridge Only" to at least be providing DHCP to my internal network clients.
This has prompted me to ask what is "Best practice" when it comes to configuring the Airport given I want to have Sleep Proxy enabled. I think the two options I have are as follows but would really welcome feedback on which is the best option to go for or if there are other options I should be thinking of
(1) Have the Airport perform DHCP for my internal clients and leave the ISP router/modem doing NAT
(2) Have the Airport perform DHCP and NAT. I think to do this I need to turn the ISP router / modem into Bridge mode only. (I've looked and I seem to have this option on the device. It's an Irish ISP branded device but I think it is a Zyxel)
I have no reason to believe the ISP router / model is doing a bad job but given I understand the Airport Extreme is a reasonably high-end device (I think?) I am wondering if option 2 is the way to go.
In addition, during my research, I have also discovered that many people seem to have their Airport Extreme also handle PPPOE. This is currently being done by my ISP router/modem. I am inclined to leave it this way (following the mantra if it isn't broken, don't fix it) but if there was a good reason to have the Aiport do this, perhaps I should make the switch? Having said this, I have seen on this forum and others, some posts about problems with Internet connection drops when the Airport is handling PPPOE.
So, a bit of a long post, but if anyone has any information or perspective on this, I'd very much appreciate it.
Thanks
Dave

I forgot to thank you, John Galt. Yap, it solve my problem by restoring back the original firmware to 7.6.1. My unit is Airport Extreme 2012. I am still using double NAT because I cannot figure it out on how to set DHCP only in the Network tab.
My goal it to use the airport extreme to the internet and to share the internet to all my devices in the house. Just like my previous Accesspoints. Before I use AP+router Linksy$ WRT54G and D-l!nk DIR-655 without activating the NAT to share my internet connection and they work.
My problem is that when I set it to DHCP in the internet tab and DHCP in the Network tab in Airport Utility inorder to solve the double NAT situation, only one of all my devices (wired or wireless) can connect to the internet. Each time I connect the other device(s) to the internet my subscriber will verify my subscription (web browser based verification) in which I have to manually enter my account number, etc to validate my subscription.
So I stick to double NAT so that I can share the internet
Our broadband provider uses DHCP to link us to the internet. If I change the settings to Static in the Internet Tab, my broadband provider will not let me connect to the internet. In the Airport Utility if I set to static in the Internet Tab inorder to set it to solve the double NAT, a message box appear informing me that I have invalid beginning IP address in the DCHP range in the Network Tab when it appears that only the last 3 digits of the DHCP range is editable.
Is there any way of configuring the Airport Utility's Internet TAB to DHCP and Network TAB to DHCP to connect to the internet with all my devices without the double NAT and without the aid of another device such as AP or router or switch connected to the Airport or vice versa?

AOL and AOl being shown as my home page default.

After a factory redo and some updates, my laptop, running 32bit Vista, ended up by opening in AOL and AOl being shown as my home page default. I do not want AOL but cant get rid of it HOW do I get rid of it? I keep going to tools and options and changing it to http:\home.suddenlink.net but keeps going to the default.
TIA, tvksi

LeeH28 wrote: After a factory redo and some updates, my laptop, running 32bit Vista, ended up by opening in AOL and AOl being shown as my home page default. I do not want AOL but cant get rid of it HOW do I get rid of it? I keep going to tools and options and changing it to http:\home.suddenlink.net but keeps going to the default. TIA, tvksi
Hello LeeH28, Can you advise the browser you are using? Have you tried to uninstall AOL?
Just a thought.
Please click the White Kudos star on the left, to say thanks.
Please mark Accept As Solution if it solves your problem.

Client NAT and Source IP Sticky

How can we implement client NAT and source IP sticky for the same server farm without running into issues? Our NAT pool is using IPs from the VIPs' subnet. Is this possible? This configuration is on Cat 6500 w/ CSM-S v. 2.1.1. Thanks.

this is possible.
The CSM will first determine the destination server based on the client ip and the sticky srcip table and then it will nat the client ip address using your pool.
It does not matter which subnet is being used as long as the servers know to respond back to the CSM.
Regards,
Gilles.

Destination NAT and Source Nat

Hi, my network have mobile users with notebooks, and they use public smtp IP address, when they out of office, without VPN ASA works well, but when they comes back in office they should change SMTP IP back to private. I know that my task could be solved via DNS service, but for some reason I should do Dnat and Snat on ASA, please answer me, Is it posible? (Because ASA have to nat and dnat on same interface Insidem and back this traffic to Inside again
)Please see this picture, I draw my task there. Thanks!

Yes it is posible through policy nat.
here is the example.
access−list policy−nat extended permit ip host 10.1.1.20 host 5.5.5.5
global (dmz) 2 192.168.2.2
nat (inside) 2 access-list policy−nat
Hope that helps.
thanks

Classic and aol mail

Dear All,
This is the tip of an iceberg: I was surfing and had an interesting crash. More later on Monday.
Short question:
Is it my newbie fault? The website? My little olde classic blueberry?
All the best,
Irene

Hi Irene!
How is "Classic and aol mail" involved in this
issue?
ali b
Dear Ali B (Borat?...lol),
Thanks for the reply. More iceberg:
The odd crash occurred when I had:
1. Had itunes on
2. Had AIM on
3. Had Netscape on
This is what I did:
1. Checked mail status from my AIM, it whistles
2. Click on link of my email at AOL
3. Netscape page opens to blah blah blah and
http://classic.webmail.aol.com
4. Click on that link
5. Do mail stuff...so far so good, everything copacetic.
However, this is what I did next:
I clicked on the AOL.com icon at the top of the page to see what I might still be able to see on the AOL site. During that brief foray (I don't remember precisely which page I was looking at, but it may have simply been the home page)
1. My cursor froze
2. I pressed the green power button for it to restart (and repair
3. (I didn't watch the restart)
4. When I went back to my computer, it looked restarted.
5. However the cursor didn't move, so I pressed green again and watched it restart (no repairing).
Now, I'm back to answering emails. AIM up, no itunes yet, not trying to repeat my crash and wait patiently for any more help.
All the best,
Irene
slot 350 mhz iMac 320 RAM Mac OS 9.2.x verizon dsl

Firefox closed and now it says that I get a connection error. IE and AOL work just fine but I use my Firefox won't connect

I use Firefox for going online all the time. Now, suddenly, when I try to connect it says the server can't be found. Internet Explorer and AOL are working just fine. However, I don't want to use them.

How do you fix this?

NAT and AOL

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for