Native iSCSI support in OS X

Is there any chance Apple will add native iSCSI support in OS X?

You will not get any answers from Apple about future products or enhancements. Don't waste your breath asking them. You can send them feedback for an enhancement request using the Apple Feedback site. But you won't get any reply from them.
If you wish to discuss rumors then try one of the many Mac rumor sites like macrumors.com

Similar Messages

  • Re: Native Language Support in Forte

    [email protected] wrote:
    I've been posed a question in the abstract about Forte's native language
    support. Does Forte support any languages other than C/C++? And if so,
    what are the limitations or caveats?
    Native Language Support could also mean the NLS standard which Forte supports. This
    provides for Internationalization (I18N) of a Forte application. This means a client
    application deployed in french, german, and english (for example), could all be making
    requests of the same Forte shared service and getting responses in the native language.
    We provide for changing the language/character set displayed both statically before the
    application starts, and dynamically change it while the application is running.
    If support native language support means ability for Forte to call existing application
    logic written in C/C++, then today you can "wrapper" C functions in a Forte Class,
    instantiate the class and "call-out" to the member functions (your c functions) directly
    from the 4GL object.
    C++ functions are a challenge due to cross platform C++ compiler issues which at a
    minimum include "name mangling" being non-standard for all the C++ compilers.
    However, you can "export" C++ class member functions as external "C" functions so that C
    code can call the function as if it was regular K&R or ANSI C.
    If other language support is required, I have customers on the East Coast which have
    successfully wrappered MicroFocus Cobol on HP-UX, and the ADA language. This is due to
    the concept of all 3GL languages today support the concept of allowing for their
    language to be called from 'C' (other possibilities are Pascal, Fortran, etc).
    Here the only caveat is you need to be aware of the other language's "boot-code" may be
    registering for operating system "signals" and not handling them appropriately. This
    rarely is an issue these days.
    If other language support means do we code generate our 4GL language to any language
    other than 'C++', the answer is currently "no".
    However, we do support exporting Service object definitions to environments like DCE,
    CORBA, Encinca (a TP monitor), and the WWW. In our next release we will complete our
    support for exporting services objects to Java. This will allow for Java applications to
    call upon the power of Forte's Shared Services architecture. Using this exporting
    concept, applications written in various other languages would be able to "call-in" to
    the Forte shared service from the ourside world.
    Didn't know what you were looking for. Hope the above hit the mark. If not, write me, or
    give me a call.
    Regards,
    jim

    Not exactly sure what you are asking. Can you rephrase your question?
    If your other server's locale is same as the one you configured then it should be ok.

  • Native AVCHD support

    We need native AVCHD support with no transcode option. if you have a quad or 8 core mac pro it will edit fine.. AVCHD is what the majority of prosumer cameras are and are going to be.. we want tapeless to save us the time and money, we shouldn't have to transcode it (though it should be an option)..
    I think apple should realized a free update to support it.. Avid has realized this already and has both native import and AMA support for AVCHD.. now when will Final cut pro? it's making me want to switch to Media composer.

    AVCHD not an editing codec. Supporting it would just mean your computer
    is wasting processing power doing something silly. It's smarter to
    transcode to an editing format and use your processor to do cool
    effects and stuff.
    geek3 wrote:
    everyone is going tapeless.
    DVCPRO HD is a professional tapeless codec
    that also works well as an editing codec.
    So is AVC-Intra.
    But not AVCHD.
    most people are getting avchd or dslr cameras
    It's a great way to get started in video, but
    the professionals who sometimes use AVCHD cameras
    know the difference between an acquisition codec
    and an editing codec.
    Here's some interesting discussion on the subject:
    http://forums.creativecow.net/thread/280/529
    And here's how to "fix" the moiré problems with DSLR footage:
    http://www.dvxuser.com/articles/article.php/20

  • Enabling (native) write support for NTFS

    I used NTFS-3G for writing on NTFS before, but because of this (https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4187322) i had to uninstall it.
    A while ago i heard something about OSX having native write support for NTFS.
    Is that even true? And if so, can i (and how) enable it on Mountain Lion?

    Tbassist4 wrote:
    Thank you. I've been looking at these two a little bit. NTFS-3g seemed like a pretty good choice at first, but I question the stability a little bit, as they do warn you that the project is experimental. Paragon actually looks like a good, safe solution, and also generally inexpensive, but I am trying to find out whether or not it will run on intel-based Macs, as it only lists system specs for running the program on a PPC-based Mac. I'll report the results as soon as I find out.
    On the System Requirements Page for Paragon it does say Intel. Actually it says x86 which are Intel processor architecture, plus on the box it shows the Universal logo on it (hard to see but it's there).
    David L.

  • MSI Bluetooth & XP SP2 native bluetooth support

    I am getting sick and tired of Widcomm's software stack, my bluetooth device will stop working if the computer has been on for a while, it needs frequent resets, etc.
    XPSP2 has native bluetooth support. Does this work with the MSI bluetooth devices, without installing any Widcomm stuff?

    Thanks to the Secunia security mailing list for this bulletin:
    Pentest Limited Security Advisory
    WIDCOMM Bluetooth Connectivity Software Buffer Overflows
    Advisory Details
    Title: WIDCOMM Bluetooth Connectivity Software Buffer Overflows
    Announcement date: 11 August 2004
    Advisory Reference: ptl-2004-03
    CVE Name: CAN-2004-0775
    Products: WIDCOMM Bluetooth Connectivity Software
    Vulnerability Type : Buffer Overflow
    Vendor-URL: http://www.widcomm.com
    Vendor-Status: Fixed in release 3.0
    Remotely Exploitable: Yes
    Locally Exploitable: N/A
    Advisory URL: http://www.pentest.co.uk/documents/ptl-2004-03.html
    Vulnerability Description
    WIDCOMM's products provides a full range of Bluetooth connectivity
    solutions for PCs, PDAs, mobile phones, headsets, digital cameras,
    access points, and various output devices.
    An unauthenticated remote attacker can submit various malformed service
    requests via Bluetooth, triggering a buffer overflow and executing
    arbitrary code on the vulnerable device.
    On Windows platforms this allows arbitrary code execution under the
    context of the currently logged on user account.
    Vulnerable Versions
    WIDCOMM supply their Bluetooth Communications software to other
    companies to allow them to integrate Bluetooth technology into their
    devices. They also supply Bluetooth SDK's to enable developers to create
    applications that use Bluetooth. Therefore it may not be immediately
    apparent that you are using the WIDCOMM Bluetooth software and version
    numbers may vary.
    WIDCOMM's website (http://www.widcomm.com/Partners/index.asp) reports
    the following companies as customers or partners with WIDCOMM:
    Logitech
    Samsung Electro-Mechanics
    Sony
    Texas Instruments
    Compaq Computer Corporation
    Dell
    National Semiconductor
    Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.
    Wistron NeWeb Corporation
    TDK Systems Europe
    Zeevo
    Cambridge Silicon Radio
    Billionton
    Broadcom Corporation
    LG Innotek
    MSI
    Fujitsu Siemens Computers
    Philips
    Silicon Wave
    Seiko Instruments Inc.
    TECOM
    Plantronics
    Mobilian
    Fujitsu Media Devices Limited
    OKI Electric Industry Co. Ltd.
    FIC
    Costar
    Brother
    Alcatel
    Atmel
    Conexant Systems, Inc.
    Microtune
    OSK
    Pentest Limited have tested for the reported vulnerabilities against
    BTStackServer version 1.3.2.7 and 1.4.2.10  on both Windows XP and
    Windows 98 which ships with MSI Bluetooth Dongles. We have also tested
    this against an HP IPAQ 5450 running WinCE 3.0 with Bluetooth software
    version 1.4.1.03.
    Pentest Limited have also written a proof of concept exploit for Windows
    XP.
    Whilst the above platforms are the only platforms tested and confirmed
    to be exploitable by Pentest Limited, discussions with the vendor lead
    us to believe that are all versions prior to version BTW & BT-CE/PPC 3.0
    are affected by this vulnerability.
    WIDCOMM has not confirmed whether BT-PPC/Phone Edition, BT-Smartphone,
    BTE-Mobile or BTE are vulnerable.
    Vendor Status
    WIDCOMM:
    14-11-2003 - Initial Pentest Limited Notification
    14-11-2003 - Notification acknowledged by WIDCOMM, request more detail
    20-11-2003 - Pentest notify WIDCOMM of another vulnerability
    06-01-2004 - Pentest send chase up Email without reply
    13-01-2004 - Another email
    13-01-2004 - WIDCOMM reply saying they are still working on it
    21-01-2004 - Pentest email WIDCOMM that they have written a POC exploit
    23-01-2004 - WIDCOMM reply saying they have resolved issue and fix
                 will be available in next release.
    10-02-2004 - Pentest ask for an update on expected release date
    11-02-2004 - WIDCOMM plan February/early March realease date
    29-03-2004 - Pentest ask for update
    12-05-2004 - Pentest ask for update
    12-07-2004 - Pentest send chase up Email without reply
    26-07-2004 - Pentest ask whether a patches will be released for older
    versions
    03-08-2004 - WIDCOMM respond. No date set for new release and no patch
                 will be made available for older versions.
    Fix
    Until version 3 of the WIDCOMM software becomes available from WIDCOMM
    or their customers/partners Pentest Limited recommend that end users
    stop using the vulnerable WIDCOMM Bluetooth software or set their
    Bluetooth device configuration to be non-discoverable or hidden. This
    will not stop the device from being vulnerable but it may limit the
    exposure.
    Credit
    These vulnerabilities were discovered by Mark Rowe and Matt Moore from
    Pentest Limited.

  • [Solved] Can't send mails using mutt's native smtp support

    I read the wiki and interested in mutt's native smtp support, so I installed extra/cyrus-sasl and decided to give it a try.
    After search the online manual of muttrc, I add a few lines to my ~/.muttrc as follows:
    set my_pass='mysecretpass'
    set my_user=[email protected]
    set smtp_authenticators="digest-md5:cram-md5"
    set smtp_url=smtps://$my_user:$[email protected]
    Everything looks fine, until I sent a test mail. The mutt's status bar is always showing "sending message ..." for a long time, but nothing is sent. I felt frustrated.
    Can anyone give me a suggestion?  So much thanks.
    =======
    Edit: The problem resulted from improper options in muttrc, which I've commented. Because I'm using the native IMAP support of mutt, some original options have to be commented, such as:
    #set postponed=+drafts
    #set record=+sent
    P.S.
    The SMTP port of Google is 587, while the SMTPS port is 465. It's not necessary  to set this port manually.
    Last edited by cwjiof (2009-11-25 13:26:15)

    try adding a :587 on the end of the url.  i'm also not sure you even need /cyrus-sasl or the _authenticators bit.  i didn't, back before i moved to an msmtp mutt setup.

  • Native Library Support OS X Lion

    The OS X Mac install of Weblogic does not include support for native libraries that I can tell (no ../server/native directory after install). I can work around this issue by specifying false for the NativeVersionEnabled flag, but wondered if/when native library support was going to be supported on the mac platform (OS X Lion). We are running the very latest version (I believe) of WebLogic.
    J

    No it is hard to tell when a specific bug gets fixed and in which release such a fix is included.<br />
    Bug fixes always first land on the Nightly trunk branch where they can be tested and 'bubble' down to the Aurora and Beta channels and only after that they may get approved for a release.
    *[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=639705 bug 639705] - [10.7] add fullscreen support for Mac OS X 10.7 Lion
    *[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=668953 bug 668953] - [10.7] Support two-finger horizontal swipe on OSX Lion
    *[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=673675 bug 673675] - [10.7] browser.gesture.swipe.up and browser.gesture.swipe.down don't work in Lion

  • Does Final Cut Pro X have native XDCAM support?

    Looking to find out from someone if  Final Cut Pro X does indeed have native XDCAM support?

    EXDCAM EX yes, is native. No conversion

  • Native printing support in Pages for iPad

    Shopping for a printer that is natively supported in Pages. Any recommendations?

    Apologies ladies and gentlemen, found answer in iWork for iOS...

  • Can I update the native sound support on my early 2008 MacPro to support HDMI audio out.

    I recently connected a HDTV as a second monitor.  I don't have HDMI listed under the possible options for audio output in my settings panel.  The MacPro's system information also doesn't list support for HDMI devices under the Audio panel -- so I assume it is not natively supported.  Is there any way I can update this?  I know I can transfer the audio signal to the TV using a 1/8" in. audio cable but I don't have one handy and would much rather just have the signal run via the HDMI.  I've copied and pasted my system information 'audio' data.  I'm using OSX 10.9.
    Built-in Line Input:
      Default Input Device:          Yes
      Input Channels:          2
      Manufacturer:          Apple Inc.
      Current SampleRate:          44100
      Transport:          Built-in
    Built-in Digital Input:
      Input Channels:          2
      Manufacturer:          Apple Inc.
      Current SampleRate:          44100
      Transport:          Built-in
    Built-in Output:
      Default Output Device:          Yes
      Default System Output Device:          Yes
      Manufacturer:          Apple Inc.
      Output Channels:          2
      Current SampleRate:          44100
      Transport:          Built-in
    Built-in Line Output:
      Manufacturer:          Apple Inc.
      Output Channels:          2
      Current SampleRate:          44100
      Transport:          Built-in
    Built-in Digital Output:
      Manufacturer:          Apple Inc.
      Output Channels:          2
      Current SampleRate:          44100
      Transport:          Built-in
    After Effects 10.5:
      Manufacturer:          Apple, Inc.
      Current SampleRate:          0
      Transport:          Unknown
    Premiere Pro 5.5:
      Manufacturer:          Apple, Inc.
      Current SampleRate:          0
      Transport:          Unknown
    Built-in Line Input:
      Default Input Device:          Yes
      Input Channels:          2
      Manufacturer:          Apple Inc.
      Current SampleRate:          44100
      Transport:          Built-in
    Built-in Digital Input:
      Input Channels:          2
      Manufacturer:          Apple Inc.
      Current SampleRate:          44100
      Transport:          Built-in
    Built-in Output:
      Default Output Device:          Yes
      Default System Output Device:          Yes
      Manufacturer:          Apple Inc.
      Output Channels:          2
      Current SampleRate:          44100
      Transport:          Built-in
    Built-in Line Output:
      Manufacturer:          Apple Inc.
      Output Channels:          2
      Current SampleRate:          44100
      Transport:          Built-in
    Built-in Digital Output:
      Manufacturer:          Apple Inc.
      Output Channels:          2
      Current SampleRate:          44100
      Transport:          Built-in
    After Effects 10.5:
      Manufacturer:          Apple, Inc.
      Current SampleRate:          0
      Transport:          Unknown
    Premiere Pro 5.5:
      Manufacturer:          Apple, Inc.
      Current SampleRate:          0
      Transport:          Unknown
    Intel High Definition Audio:
      Audio ID:          12
    Line Output:
      Connection:          1/8-Inch Jack
    Headphone:
      Connection:          1/8-Inch Jack
    Line Input:
      Connection:          1/8-Inch Jack
    Speaker:
      Connection:          Internal
    S/PDIF Optical Digital Audio Output:
      Connection:          Optical
    S/PDIF Optical Digital Audio Input:
      Connection:          Optical
    Line Output:
      Connection:          1/8-Inch Jack
    Headphone:
      Connection:          1/8-Inch Jack
    Line Input:
      Connection:          1/8-Inch Jack
    Speaker:
      Connection:          Internal
    S/PDIF Optical Digital Audio Output:
      Connection:          Optical
    S/PDIF Optical Digital Audio Input:
      Connection:          Optical

    No, unfortunately Mac Pros older than 2010 will not send audio through their Mini DisplayPort connectors, even with a more modern video card like the 5770.
    Matt

  • Two native iSCSI LUNs in a 2012 storage pool

    I have a Windows Server 2012 storage pool connected to a single SAN VIA iSCSI. I'd like to add a second SAN and present the virtual disks as part of the same pool to extend my total storage. Is this possible?

    Hi,
    I do not have the environment to test if add LUNs from different SAN will work or not but personally I believe it will work as SAN (LUN) is supported to be added into a storage pool. 
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and un-mark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

  • Will Native Extensions support C#?

    The title pretty much covers it, but to go into more detail:
    Various blogs and spec pages have indicated that C and Java are the 2 main native languages used.  However, does that actually mean that Native Extensions is limited to this?
    In an article here: http://www.adobe.com/devnet/air/articles/developing-native-extensions-air.html
    Daniel says 'Although you may be interested in targeting Objective-C, C#, C++, C, or some other language'.  Does this mean that C# will be supported? And if so, does that mean that the open source variants Mono and Portable.NET will also be supported for UNIX?
    Thank you,
    Dominic

    You have to use C to interact with the ActionScript extension classes, but the rest of the extension can be written in any language that you can access from the C code on the specific platform. Objective C, C++, and C# should be fairly straightforward (but I'm not particularly knowledgable on the subject).
    Have a look at the .net image encoder example here: http://www.adobe.com/devnet/air/native-extensions-for-air.html for an example of how to use .net in an extension.
    (Java can be used directly on Android and Blackberry Tablet OS.)

  • Native Exchange support on new Blackberry Models?

    Greetings, I have been told by a coworker that all newer Blackberry phones support synchronization with a Microsoft Exchange Server natively. Probably through OWA, though i'm not certain. We're not talking about BES servers or BIS accounts, just pure native support on the phone itself. As in, input OWA address, username, and password, and BINGO! all your mail, contacts, calendar entries sync beautifully between the phone and the server. Is this true? If so, how do I set this up? If not, I'll have to go another route and install BES. Basically, I need three separate Blackberry devices to be able to sync their e-mail, contacts, and calendar with a 2010 Exchange Server, if there is another way of doing this without using BES, please let me know. Thanks in advance!

    There is no way to wirelessly synchronize  your contacts, calendar, tasks or memo pad using the BlackBerry Internet Service. The only way for wireless synchronization to take place from Microsoft Exchange to your BlackBerry device is to use the BlackBerry Enterprise Server.
    Hope this helps.

  • ISCSI support on Solaris

    A recent article on Search Storage asserts that Solaris 10 will support iSCSI. Is this true or just another journalistic fantasy?

    I have seen several threads that have suggested that a version of Solaris 10 will support iSCSI. Can you tell me your best estimate of when that "version" of Solaris 10 will become available ?
    Also, I have seen several threads that have suggested that support for iSCSI on Solaris 10 is up to the manufactures of the adapters to create device drivers that are compliant with Solaris 10 ( i.e. Cisco ). Can you please comment on what is meant by Solaris 10 will "support" iSCSI, and what part of that "support" is left up to the manufactures of the devices interfacing with Solaris 10 ( i.e. device drivers )

  • When will Firefox have native DNSSEC support

    At the moment DNSSEC support is only available using third party developed plugins - there are multiple plugins with different logic available. This all makes it hard for a simple home user to start noticing DNSSEC. As DNSSEC is spreading very quickly all over the world is there a plan to add native support for DNSSEC in the Mozilla products?

    This doesn't seem to have started yet.
    See:
    [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=672239 bug 672239] - implement DNSSEC TLS
    <i>([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/page.cgi?id=etiquette.html please do not comment in bug reports])</i>

Maybe you are looking for