Need help on Production order confirmation cancel issue

Hi,
I need your help regarding Prduction Order issue.
We have created Production Order and issued raw materials and we done paritial confirmation also. Now the order status is PNCF.
After that we notice that it was wrong confirmation so we went CO13 we cancel those confirmations.
But in our zprogram still those order is showing as paritial confirmation order.
I need in which SAP table confirmation status stored and what will be the production order status after cancel the confirmation.
and in which table cancel production order confirmation data will be availiable.
please guide me
sateesh

HI,
There is No Standard Status for Reversing or cancelling the Confirmation.
Generally, When you confirm the status PCNF or CNF gets active.
When you reverse it theybecome inactive.
also let us know, whether You cancelled or reversed the confirmation or revesed the GI postings.
If you have reversed the GI postings using Reverse Movement type or Materail documents, it is possible to have the PCNF order status unchanged.
Regards
Ratan
Edited by: Ratan on Aug 28, 2009 7:23 PM

Similar Messages

Need help on sales order confirmation out put type

Hi Team,
Please help on this issue.
In our sales document types order confirmation is happening through the inboud idoc, user requrement is once order is confirmed immediately sales order confirmation output type should send sucessfully, but the problem is
Inbound idoc is using the sales order and blocking at the same time RSNAST program is using this sales order for sending the output type but not able to send due to the sales order is blocked by inbound idoc.
Could you some body help me on this how can we proceed on this.
thanks & Regards,
MK.

Check the Dispatch time of the Output type in transaction code :NACE. You need not execute RSNAST00, if the despatch time is set to 3 ( Send with application own transaction ) or 4 (Send Immediately). The output will trigger automatically after the sales order is saved.

Production order confirmation cancellation with auto goods receipt

Hi expers,
I've got a production order using backflush and Auto GR for last operation(Control Key with Auto GR Tick). After the confirmation operation had been done,the end user cancelled the goods receipt using T-code/MvT:MIGO/ 102 by mistake,and then using T-code CO13 cancelld the confirmation.Now the delivered qty of the production order is negative, the material document generated by using MIGO/102 by mistake can't be cancelled, i also tried to do a migo with 101,the abap program dump. the production order can not even be viewed by using CO03.The ABAP program dump.
Any help would be much appreciated!

Here is some of the dump message:Runtime errors DYNPRO_FIELD_CONVERSION
Short text Conversion error .
Error analysis
The program has been interrupted and cannot resume.
Program "SAPLMIGO" attempted to display fields on screen 0200.
An error occurred during the conversion of this data.
How to correct the error
There was a conversion error in the output of fields to the screen.
The formats of the ABAP output field and the screen field may not match.
Some field types require more space on the screen than in the ABAP
program. For example, a date output field on the screen requires two
more characters than the corresponding field in the ABAP program. When
the date is displayed on the screen, an error occurs resulting in this
error message.
Screen name.............. "SAPLMIGO"
Screen number............ 0200
Screen field............. "GOITEM-WEMNG"
Error text............... "FX015: Sign lost."
Other data:

Production order confirmation cancellation

Hi
Can any body suggest the process of prod order confirmationcancellation. In my case, the prod order was created and confirmed and goods movement 101 completed. Now If I want to post confirmation cancellation, how I need to proceed. Please suggest
I tried to do it through CO13 and got error BK 888
"Document incomplete -- transaction can not be executed"
Please suggest

Hi,
For detaile error check in COGI t code.
Arun

Price difference on cancellation of production order confirmation

Hi,
We are having a material which is maintained at price control "S". We have created a production order for the material. In due course of business, we did confirmation for say 100 pcs of the material. However, immediatly on confirmation, we realized that we do not need to do the confirmation & hence we did the cancellation of the production order confirmation using CO13.
On doing the production order confirmation cancellation, we observed that the system has posted some amount to "price difference account"
We also observed that once in a while this kind of entries do get posted.
It is requested to please let us know in why system is behaving this way?
We have checked SAP Note no 216080 "Price difference when reversing GI for S-Priced material" & SAP Note no 215980 'Price difference during GR for the production order". However we are not convinced that these could be the reason for the price difference.
Thanking you in anticipation
Regards
Santosh Kumar Agarwal

Hi,
Yes, you are correct in the understanding that the system creates quants in 914 when the production order confirmation is cancelled. But, it does not generate any TR or TO in the background to post the stock back into the original storage type.
Can we not use the put away strategies so that the system determines where to place the material? My query is that despite all the configurations for automatic TO creation and confirmation for movement type 262, it does not generate a TO (or TR) in the background when a production order confirmation is cancelled using CO13.
However, if I manually post a material using MB1A for 261 movement type and reverse it using 262, it generates a TO and confirms it as per the setting in configuration.
The same thing does not work when we run it through PP (CO11N and then CO13).
Any suggestions on how to approach this and where to check for missing configurations?
Thanks and Regards,
Gaurishankar

Cancellation of Production Order confirmation (CO13) not generating TR/TO

Hi,
We are facing a typical issue in the PP-WM interface. When we create an order and confirm it (partial confirmation), the Goods movement happens (261 mvt type) as desired and the TO is created and confirmed in the background.
But, when we try to reverse the movement type (cancelling the production order confirmation using CO13) then there are no TRs or TOs generated in the background (for movement type 262).
When I manually try to post a material document for 262 movement type, it creates a TO in the background (as per the configurations that I maintained) but this does not happen when movement type 262 is called using PP interface.
The movement type configurations are all done for Automatic TR and TO generations - this works with normal IM process (when we manually post using MB1A transaction) but not with the return Goods movement happening with PP.....here, the material comes back to the interim storage type 914. We then need to create a TO manually and confirm it to take the stock back in to the original storage type and bin.
We want that when a process order confirmation is cancelled then the materials should be posted back in to the original storage type and bin (from where the material was issued against the order).
For Info: COGI shows no errors during the 262 movements, also, material document is generated for 262 movement type but no TR/TO generated.
Is there any configuration that we have missed?
Thanks and Regards,
Shankar

Hi,
Yes, you are correct in the understanding that the system creates quants in 914 when the production order confirmation is cancelled. But, it does not generate any TR or TO in the background to post the stock back into the original storage type.
Can we not use the put away strategies so that the system determines where to place the material? My query is that despite all the configurations for automatic TO creation and confirmation for movement type 262, it does not generate a TO (or TR) in the background when a production order confirmation is cancelled using CO13.
However, if I manually post a material using MB1A for 261 movement type and reverse it using 262, it generates a TO and confirms it as per the setting in configuration.
The same thing does not work when we run it through PP (CO11N and then CO13).
Any suggestions on how to approach this and where to check for missing configurations?
Thanks and Regards,
Gaurishankar

Help with SQL Code - Production Order with Manual Issue Method

Hi,
I need some assistance here.
I need to retrieve Production Order which has component's issue method = 'M'.
Eg:
Production Order #50001 has 4 components.
Component A, issue method = 'M'
Component B, issue method = 'B'
Component C, issue method = 'B'
Component D, issue method = 'M'
Production Order #50002 has 2 components.
Component B, issue method = 'B'
Component C, issue method = 'B'
When I run the query, I want to display the Production #50001 componenets simply because in this Production Order, it contains components with issued method 'M'. However, Production #50002 will not be displayed because no components are with issued method = M.
Appreicate any help in advance.

No, this is not what I need.
To put in IssueMethod in the where clause will only gives me the component line with Manual.
Please refer to the example.
I have a production order which, its components have combination of issue method = 'Manual' as well as Backflush.
I need to display all of them within the Production Order if the production order contain any line which has issue method = Manual.

PRODUCTION ORDER CONFIRMATION INCORRECT

Hi Gurus,
The Issue I have at hand is related to a PRODUCTION ORDER CONFIRMATION INCORRECT. Ok here is what happened. A production order was put in for quantity of 3. But the confirmation against this order was posted for 100,XXX,XXX. This was scrapped and only 3 was confirmed and received into the inventory (So inventory movement is fine, only for 3). But the initial confirmation of 100,XXX,XXX caused posting for Labor & OH based on the activities to sec. cost elements. So now what happened is there are posting against sec. cost elements in millions, which have been settled to cost centers. Obviously this is incorrect.
So now we have statistical postings to sec cost elements that are overstated and incorrect. The period for the prod order has closed. The prod order has status of released.
Now my questions are as follows:
1. How do we go about fixing this? Best practice?
2. Can we manually post to sec cost elements to correct overstating?
3. Can we do manual Journal entry to resolve discrepancy (But that would be a real posting).
Also would had it been the best solution to just cancel the prod order with the wrong confirmation and re-issue another in the period of occurrence. If you need more information to provide help please let me know.
I am new to product costing. Please help.
Thank in Advance!!!

Hi Ajay,
I have some follow up questions, please help. Thank You so much. I am sure I will be able to resolve soon, now. Thanks
2. The manual entries that were posted, can they be reversed, even though period is closed? You mentioned reverse in same
period. So I can post a reversal document in the period of occurrence?
No. For any FI posting, your period has to be open
Q. Ok then if the period is closed and I have to reverse the postings, do I post a negative posting in the current period?
3. Also should I run KB21N in the same period? (If I can, I should I believe?)
Yes, in the same period
Q. If the period is closed like I mentioned earlier, would I still be able to run KB21N in the same period or this should also be run in the current period?
4. In KB21N I changed the screen variant to u201CAllu201D but I still donu2019t see sender u201Cproduction orderu201D, I just see sender cost center, sender activity type, receiving cost center, receiving order and etc?
The field "order" is the field you should use.. It is same as Prod order / Int Order
Q. Yes ok but in KB21N there is no sending order, there is only receiving order. Please help
5. Also will the KB21N posting fix the Profit and loss posting of the loss?
Yes, it will.. But you will have to re-run period end steps until settlement
Q. re-run period end steps, can you elaborate a little more. Thanks
Thanks again for all your great feedback.
Arvind

Serial Number. Production Order Confirmation. GR. UD. Sales Delivery

Hi Gurus,
Please help on this issue to get any user exits .....
As part of Serial number management, we have a certain issues on serial number confirmation, goods receipt from production order and quality inspection with UD.
Master data:
Finished product material master, Workscheduling view, Serial number profile maintained " ASRN"
Process flow:
1) Avalon Specific Serial numbers generation for finished goods through production order release status.
              (A11206000001)
                                    A - Avalon
                                    1   - PCB Unit 1
                                    12 - Year 2012
                                    06 - Week
                                    000001 - Running serial number for the week.
2) Production order confirmation through CO11n transaction.
3) Production order Goods receipt through MIGO transaction against order.
4) Quality Inspection with Usage Decision through QA32 transaction.
5) Goods Issue for Delivery.
SAP Product Error:
1) System does not track and control the operation wise confirmed serial numbers during order confirmation.
2) System does not track and control the finally confirmed serial numbers during order goods receipt.
3) System does not track and control the last goods receipt qty in Usage Decision.
4) For semi finished product, if we maintain serial number profile in workscheduling view, system is not showing goods issue material list in Co11n transaction for the finished goods.
5) Interfacing the serial number reading scanner with SAP, is not working without entering material number and serial number manually.
6) System does not tracking and controlling the last Usage Decision done serial number during Goods issue to Sale order Delivery.
Regards,
Santha

Hi Santha,
This is a bit vast, but I'll try to address at least some of the issues:
1- serial number in operation confirmation is not possible, for the reason that serailization is part of stock management, and as WIP in an order, this is not stock yet. Actually you cannot confirm the manufactured material either, and those 2 go together.
For tracking specificly WIP, there's something called WIP batches; you may look into it to see if you can use it.
2- during GR system will propose those SNs that you have defined for the order at release or creation.
3- ?
4- GI in CO11N is provided only for BACKFLUSHED material components. Serialized materials CANNOT be backflushed.
5- You can use a barcode reader to read the serial number (instead of keyboard entry) when cursor is on the right field in the respective screen.
6- ?

URGENT: Prob with Production Order Confirmation

Hi Gurus,
I have a problem with Production Order Confirmation.
When I am confirming a Prod Order and if the components present are more than '999', then error is being thrown and Material Document Number is not being created.
I want to split the records into 500 slots and pass them at a time for the creation of the Production Order so that it doesnt throw me an error while creating a Material Document No.
While saving the Production Order confirmation order, it should split the records into 500 slots each and then create Material Document No for each slot.
Can anyone please help me out in this regard, how to solve this.
Thanks & Regards,
Harish Kalla

Hi Harish,
This problem is addressed in OSS Note : 36353
The Symptom reads like this
==========================================================================
When you post documents using the AC interface (from SD, MM or other applications), items appear in the FI document which are identical in all or in almost all fields.
This can also cause error message F5 727 ("Maximum number of items in FI reached"). The system issues this error if more than 999 items occur in an FI document.
===========================================================================
This Note is an elaborate one..
Hence, go through this and ask your FI Consultant to help you in this regard.
All the best..
Regards,
Siva

Reservation reduction on production order without goods issue

At our plants we have a kanban approach where component materials are
issued to any available production order as an unplanned GI instead of
to a specific production order as a planned GI. This causes component
demand to be overstated because the reservation is not reduced. This
is resulting in overstated demand in MRP.
Due to inventory problems and inconsistent actual component
consumption, backflushing is also not an option.
How could we reduce the reservation quantities on the components based
on the quantity remaining in the production order? I believe we would
want to trigger this from a production order confirmation (CO15).
I found that if we can update the field ENMNG(Quantity withdrawn) in table RESB,
the reservations get reduced.But I don't wabt to do direct update of table RESB in the user exit in transaction CO15.
Any help with this isseu is appreciated.
Thanks,
Ashok.

In customizing materials management -
> Inventory Management and Physical Inventory->Goods Issue / Transfer Postings make--> Set Up Dynamic Availability Check
For 261 movement type set Dynamic Availability Check as "F"
and then in omcq transaction M7 362 message set "E"
This customizings prevent good ıssue more than reservation quantity

Restricting Good Receipt Unless Production Order Confirmed

Hi
Experts,
I want to Restricting Good Receipt Unless Production Order Confirmed
I am doing following thing but the error is occured.
Use Tcode BS02 ( Customising USer status profile).
2. Select the order type which you want to configure (eg:PP000001) and choose "Details" button.
3. In the User status table do the following:
a. In the status no field type"1" , status field "Sta1", short text"GR not allowed", lowest no "1", Highest No "2". Mark a tick in the initial stats check box.
b.Next line, type status no field "2" ,status field "sta2", short text"Gr allowed", lowest no "2" , highest no "2".
4. Select the STA1 line and choose details. select the "create"button.select the "GR for prod order", mark "forbidden
radio button" and "set radio button".
5. Select the STA2 line and choose details. Selct the "create"button. select "confirm order", mark "permitted radio button" and "set radio button". Next choose "GR for prod order" , mark "permitted radio button".
6.Save.
Create a prod order and check whether the required scenario is working.
I have created user status profile as PP000001 GR
ERROR
First define allowed object types
Message no. BS218
Diagnosis
The object types for which a status profile may be used define which business transactions are included in business transaction control.
Procedure
First define for which object types this status profile can be used.
What is object type how to define?
Thanks & Regards
Pert

Hi,
Refer to the below thread which addresses the same need:
Re: GR not allowed :BS02
Revert if you face any issues.
Regards,
Vivek

Production order confirmation problems

My production facility has been having problems for years centered around the production order confirmation process. My colleagues and I are considering submitting an OSS note to SAP, but figured that we should present our problems in these forums before making that next step.
Here are some individual issues which I believe may be related. All of these issues occur off and on at random. They will typically occur when more users are working in the SAP system or when SAP is running slow.
- When an order is confirmed and a label is printed, sometimes the quantity on the label will be incorrect. Sometimes no label will print out at all. When the order is unconfirmed and then reconfirmed again, a label prints out with the correct quantity.
- When a confirmation is unconfirmed, the unconfirmation will not backflush the associated materials correctly. Sometimes this error will appear in CO1P for us to re-confirm, but not always.
- Sometimes confirmations will only backflush certain materials and not ALL the components within the production order. When the confirmation is unconfirmed and then reconfirmed again, the confirmation will backflush all materials correctly.
These problems occur at random intervals and never present the user with an error. Close to 100% of the time all the confirmation issues will be corrected by simply u201Cre-doingu201D the confirmation as we did the first time (no changes in the process). Only the second time around there will not be any issues. This leads me to believe there is some internal issue with SAP, perhaps involving which tables CO11N pulls from when a confirmation is made.
Any and all help is appreciated. We currently run the AFS version of SAP. This is my last stop before submitting an OSS note.

Hi,
I have not worked on AFS, so consider the below as a pointer which might help:
When you post confirmations & notice that the components are not being backflushed, check in COGI it could be that there are some incorrect goods movement. You will be required to clear these entries from COGI.
I suspect that you notice these because, the confirmations are being posted even before the stock for the same has been received & hence the issue with labels as well.
Do a check on the above, if it resolves the issue, then i would suggest re-design the process to ensure you do not have COGI or COFC entries.
Also do a search in OSS for AFS specific notes on confirmation.
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Vivek

Without Production order confirmation How to settle the cost of prd order

Dear all,
How to settle the cost production order with out production order confirmation.Any setting is there Or program.
Regards,
Naresh Redddy.

Dear Naresh,
To settle the cost of production order, you need not to confirm it. But on the same time if you want to settle the order when its not confirmed then WIP amount will be posted. WIP value will be posted if your order does not have DLV or TECO status. In your case, if you not confirmed the order, only material cost if any issued for order will be calculated, no activity cost will be calculate. And if you want to post the variance then order status needs to be either DLV (Completely Delivered) or TECO (Technically Completed). Here also the cost of activity will not be considered as you didn't confirmed the order.
So if you want to settled the order without confirmation, then Activity cost will not be added in your settled cost. So your product costing will not be accurate.
Please revert if you have any other doubts.
Regards,
Hiren Ramani

GR qty showing less than production order confirmation qty

Hello Experts,
Greetings.
My issue is while doing production order confirmation(CO12),for some materials it shows less GR quantity than the confirmation qty.I m wondering how it can be possible?
What could be the problem?
Plz advice.
Thanks
Nitin

Confirmed qty of each operation and delivery qty at the header are two different fields. Confirmed qty will be the same with the yield to conf. during confirmation. Whereas, the GR qty is equal to the total sum of quantity received from the order.
Check whether during confirmation you create auto GR or not. If yes, then check the COGI t-code. There might be some error log of goods receipt in there. If no, then check GR qty in document goods movement compared to confirmed qty during confirmation.
Hope it helps.

Need help on Production order confirmation cancel issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for