Need resolution & aspect ratio advice

Hi everyone,
recently I've ran into some problems with Final Cut Express 4.0:
my original video material (shot on a Kodak Zi8) is HD 1080p, and has a resolution of 1920x1080, so it's 16:9.
The first question is about the resolution: obviously, I want to keep the high quality of the video, however, the only setting of the "easy configuration" (sorry, translating from the German program here) that comes close to the original resolution is the "Apple Intermediate Codec 1080i60", and it only features 1440x1080. Am I doing a mistake when selecting this one and is my video material scaled down already then? Is there a more appropriate setting?
Second part of the question, which I guess is a direct result of the first part: I've tried to export the video for Youtube in H.264 and various different settings, and I never seem to be able to accomplish a true 16:9 video as the end result. I always have black bars left and right of the picture (see here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFM3TAbvObw). If I try to apply a 16:9 resolution myself (by taking the width and multiplying it with 1,78) I end up with a faultily scaled (flat) picture.
Any suggestions are very much appreciated,
thanks in advance!

recently I've ran into some problems with Final Cut Express 4.0:
When you update to the free FCE 4.0.1 FCE from Software update 1920x1080 codecs are available.
See how they go with your camera. Most still cameras have problems capturing directly to FCE as there codecs are non standard.
Fingers crossede.
Al

Similar Messages

Resolution, Aspect Ratio & Black Bars! How to stretch screen?

Hi!
I have a HP HDX 9200 series laptop computer with an ATI 2600 HD XT and running latest Windows 7 Beta and I first noticed that my games didn't streched to full screen when they weren't using the native resolution on the LCD screen (1680*1050), so, let's say, when running one of them in 1024*768, I get two huge black bars at the side! Now, this didn't happen with previouses OSes (Vista). Then, I noticed that the same happened if I went to change the Windows resolution to 1024*768, I would get the same bars at the sides while being in Windows!
I tried downloading latest ATI W7 drivers to see if there was an option or something to stretch the image, but I couldn't find one.
Can you please let me know how to make the screen scale to the whole display, even if it isn't in the native resolution?
Thanks in advance.

HERE'S THE SOLUTION TO THE ATI BLACK BARS PROBLEM
It took months for me to find this on the web, so I thought I would share it here, the first hit for 'ATI Black Bars windows 7' on Google.
1) Open Catalyst Control Center
2) Use the drop down box at the top to click on Desktops and Displays
3) At the very bottom where your monitors are displayed, click on the little black arrow and click "Configure". Note that if configure does not appear, you are clicking on the wrong black triangle (you must use the one in the very bottom section).
4) This will bring up properties for that display. Choose "Full Screen" or "Maintain aspect ratio", whatever your preference. If you are getting black bars on all sides, you are likely on "Centered".
5) IF THE OPTIONS ARE GREYED OUT, as they were when I first tried this, the workaround is to lower your display resolution before attempting the above. Once you have changed the setting, you can return your display resolution back to whatever you like and the setting will remain as your display changes (movies, games, etc).
Hope that helps!!
This DOES NOT WORK for DirectX9-based ATI graphics devices on Windows 7. In fact, there is currently NO SOLUTION to this problem if you are using a DX9-based ATI graphics device on Windows 7.
ATI has refused to release any proper Windows 7 drivers for their DX9-based devices, so if you are running Windows 7 with such a device, then your only choice is to install the "legacy" Vista driver onto Windows 7.
If your computer is a laptop, this situation is made even more convoluted by the fact that ATI's driver packages refuse to install on laptops unless you use a third-party utility called "ATI Mobility Modder" to first modify ATI's driver package. Apparently ATI wants you to get the driver from your laptop manufacturer, but since most laptop manufacturers have not bothered to release newer video drivers that really isn't a reasonable expectation on ATI's part.
There is a bug in ATI's "legacy" Vista drivers on Windows 7 which hides the scaling/stretching options that should be present. Normally you would find these options under the "Notebook Panel Properties" node of the treeview in the Catalyst Control Center. They show up there fine using the same driver on Vista on the same hardware, but they are mysteriously absent when using the same driver on the same hardware on Windows 7.
It looks increasingly unlikely that ATI will EVER update their "legacy" drivers for their DX9-based graphics devices. It looks even more unlikely that they will ever develop proper Windws 7 drivers for these devices. Instead they are focusing all their efforts on their newer DX10-based devices and drivers.
This leaves users of laptops with DX9-based ATI graphics in a particularly frustrating and stupid situation.  DirectX 9 graphics devices are perfectly adequate for running Windows 7, and therefore they should have proper Windows 7 drivers released for them by the manufacturer (ATI). I shouldn't have to buy an entirely new laptop just so I can get a DX10-based video device just so I can get the stretching/scaling options in Windows 7. If this were a desktop PC, I could just swap out the video card, but that's not an option on a laptop.
Therefore, it falls on Microsoft to either (1) put pressure on ATI to fix their broken "legacy" Vista DX9 drivers to add back the scaling/stretching options when running on Windows 7, or (2) add an OS-level user option (independent of drivers) that can be used to control the resolution scaling/stretching.
My specific situation:
I have an HP Compaq 6910p laptop with the ATI Mobility Radeon X2300 graphics chipset (DX9-based). I am running Windows 7 x64 RTM. Neither ATI nor HP supply an official Windows 7 driver for this graphics chipset, and the driver supplied by Microsoft is bare-bones (no advanced options/settings like ATI's Catalyst Control Center offers). So I installed the latest (9.11) ATI "legacy" Vista x64 CCC package (after using ATI Mobility Modder to modify it so it will actually install on the laptop).
I run a lot of classic video game emulators and older games that use old 4:3 resolution modes like 800x600 or 1024x768. When they switch into these modes, I get huge black borders around all edges of the screen (top/bottom/left/right) and a tiny little viewable area right in the center of the screen. I have to squint to see anything. What I want -- and I don't think it's an unreasonable expectation at all -- is for the image to be stretched to fill the screen WITHOUT being distorted to change the aspect ratio. In other words, when I switch to any 4:3 mode (like 800x600) I expect the image to completely fill my screen vertically (all the way to the top and bottom edges) but with black bars along the left/right edges so that the aspect ratio is still truly 4:3. This is how I was able to make it work with Vista on this same laptop before, so I expect to be able to do the same thing using Windows 7. Unfortunately there is currently no way to do that, which completely destroys my abillity to use lower resolution modes comfortably on this laptop at all.
Well you can work past that actualy, but the option is annoying to do everytime since when i go to a lower resolution everything becomes blurry and so on.
Heres what you do when you use a dx9 graphics card.
1. lower you resolution one step down. I use 1680x1050 so i went to 1600x1024.
You should have the black bars lower bottom on the side different to everyone.
2. Since CCC dosnt give the scaeling option under "Notebook & Panel Properties" in Advanced View
    you change to basic and do it under Quick Settings.
3. take "Notebook & Panel Properties" on the right side in the box click on " Resize the desktop to fit the display panel" and click go change it to "Resize to fit the display panel"
NOTE. the trick is that it changes back automaticaly to "Do not resize" when you have your maximum resolution that is recommended by W7 thats why you need to take some other resolution.
I know its annoying to change it all the time but its the best there is right now and atleast you got the games fit to the screen and you can change the resolution back each time but then you got to do the resize with CCC again when you want to play some games.
Hope it was a help to you.

Resolution & aspect ratio

I am going to take some pictures in RAW format with my Canon 60D to use in video editing. I'll crop my original RAW file to 16:9 aspect ratio and reduce image size to 1920x1080 (16:9) then.
a. As Canon 60D provides L(RAW) 5184x3456, M(RAW) 3888x2592 and S(RAW) 2592x1728, I wonder which original RAW format I should use. Is there any differene in quality of my final product with different original RAW?
b. Say if I choose S(RAW) 2592x1728, can I crop it to 2592x1458 (16:9) and scale it down to the proper size to use in video editing? If I do it this way, will the final video file become much bigger?
Thank you.
Ahachng

Do you plan on animating the photos, e.g. zoom in, zoom out, pan around? Or will you be leaving them static? If you're not going to be animating the photos, you can probably use the lowest resolution--and practically speaking, you don't even need to crop and resize the images externally before using them in Premiere Pro. As of CS5, PPro has much better scaling algorithms and can produce very nice results simply by scaling the photos in your editing sequence. This lets you position a large photo any way you see fit within your sequence, so you don't need to worry about creating multiple versions of a cropped photo, e.g. wide, medium, close-up.
If you will be animating the photos, there are practical maximum dimensions you'll want to be aware of: maximum dimensions in Adobe Premiere Pro CS5 and CS5.5 « Premiere Pro work area

Match resolutions/aspect ratio of two different cameras

I shot a short video with an iPad 3 and a Sony DCR-DVD-403 NTSC.
The video from the iPad is fuller and wider than the footage I shot with the Sony Cam.
1. I just need them to be the same size as I edit. So that I can produce this project with all video the same size.
2. I would also like to know if I can capture the footage from the miniDVD straight into Premiere Pro without having to use a third party converter to rip and convert. Is this possible, if so, then I am hoping I get the option to match the video aspect ratio from the discs with the iPad footage.
I can't find the answer to these questions anywhere.
Many thanks,
TekyJohn

You have three issues to deal with -
1) Sony footage is Standard Definition, iPad is HD
2) Sony is 4:3, iPad is 16:9 widescreen
3) iPad clips are 30.0 frames per second, while the standard for video is 29.97 frames actually, like the Sony clips are.
If both were widescreen, this would be so much simpler....
Do you need to deliver in HD, or will SD be ok? Because if you blow up the SD to HD, it will look very soft next to the HD video. Better to bring the HD down to SD specs. If they were both 16:9, you'd be all set!
However, you need to decide if you want to crop the iPad footage to 4:3, or make the 4:3 clips into 16:9, either way you lose part of the image. Or you could mix them as is, but you will have either letterboxing or pillarboxing on just ONE of the clips and that will not look good when switching between the two cameras.
So...if you want to deliver as 16:9 SD, you could do this - create a new DV Widescreen sequence and add your clips. To get rid of the black side bars (pillarboxing) on the SD clips, use the Adobe Motion control in Effects panel to Scale the clip up until it fills the screen. You then may also need to adjust the clip up or down within the frame so as to not cut off heads, keep subject framed, using Position settings for X and Y. That is the downside to making 4:3 into 16:9, you lose some of the image. For the iPad clip, right-click and select "Scale to Frame Size" and it will fill the widescreen just fine.
If you want to deliver 4:3 SD, then choose an NTSC DV preset, which will be 4:3 and suitable to the Sony clips. Then bring in the iPad clips and Scale down to fit using Motion effect, keeping in mind the SIDES of the video will be clipped off. Again, you can use the Position settings in Motion to move the frame left or right to keep the subject framed.
As for frame rate issue, I believe that Adobe will handle that for you when putting the 30fps clip into the 29.97 sequence, should be ok but may result in a little weirdness in smoothness of motion, not sure. I don't know if you'll run into audio sync issues between the two though??
Good luck
Jeff Pulera
Safe Harbor Computers

Resolution/Aspect Ratio of .SWF

hi all,
i just need to know how the aspect ratio of swf be same when
we play the swf on LCD,Plasma TVs. As currently the .swf changes if
we check it on the TV screen.
Any help on this will be highly appriciated.
thanks and regards
nik

You will probably have better luck getting an answer in the iWork for iOS community.

Screen Resolution & Aspect Ratio

I am a new user of Boot Camp, running Vista Home Premium w/SP1 on a 3 GHz MacPro tower with a 30" Cinema display. Both the screen resolution and aspect ratio are great with VMware Fusion, but with Boot Camp the resolution is too small and the aspect ratio is not correct (everything appears too large, and stretched from side-to-side). I have distorted audio with Fusion, so I would prefer to get Boot Camp working so that the screen presentation is correct.
Additionally, the display driver selection on both Boot Camp and Fusion seems to be ignoring that I have a GeForce 8800 GT graphics card - is this perhaps the reason for my screen problems? The only other issue is file sharing - is there any way around that besides throwing money at some more software (using Paragon appears to be a viable alternative)?
Any ideas on how to correct this would be really appreciated! (And any ideas on how to fix the audio problem with Fusion?)
Thanks in advance,
Dave

You might want to install the drivers straight from nVidia's website instead of from the disk.
File sharing? You might as well burn yourself an Ubuntu disk, boot from it, open up Gparted, and shrink one of your partitions by 32 GB (or smaller) and throw a FAT32 partition in the free space. Then throw all the files you want to share on the disk that appears on your Mac OS X desktop (it'll also appear in Windows's My Computer).
Or just use a combination of MacFUSE (http://code.google.com/p/macfuse/) and NTFS-3G (http://www.ntfs-3g.org/) on the Mac side, and MacDisk (http://www.macdisk.com/mden.php3) or HFSExplorer (http://hem.bredband.net/catacombae/hfsx.html) on the Windows side. On the Mac side, the disk appears on the desktop and you can access it via the holy Finder like any other disk or folder. On the Windows side, however, you have to access it by opening up the app you downloaded. Haha, Windows.

Help needed re: aspect ratios

Hey all,
I have a nagging problem with aspect ratios and I am hoping that someone on here can help. I understand that it might be a little more of an "in-depth" issue than most, but it's driving me absolutely insane and I will be forever grateful to the souls that help me with it.
I am compressing all my films to Flash for my website. The films are all in different aspect ratios. I am including links to help fully understand:
16:9 http://img122.imageshack.us/img122/1663/elotroladolgprogpd9.jpg
4:3 with a 16:9 matte??
http://img513.imageshack.us/img513/6516/burningdownqtga4.jpg
4:3 with a tiny matte
http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/5733/finalscherbarthph5.jpg
16:9 with a 2.35:1 matte
http://www.robertobentivegna.com/test
4:3 with a 1.85:1 matte
http://img182.imageshack.us/img182/5488/miraklech9.jpg
I guess my question, or my issue is... should I try and re-frame the images so that they don't have mattes, and how would I go about doing that? I can understand watching a matted 1.85:1 image on a 4:3 TV, but on a website it makes little sense to have a 4:3 frame if I can avoid it.
For example, this image: http://img513.imageshack.us/img513/6516/burningdownqtga4.jpg
is this a 16:9 frame matted for 4:3??
I am so confused.
Roberto

What encoding tool are you using? If you're using Flash Encoder (part of Flash Professional), you can trim out the mattes in the Crop And Resize tab of the Settings dialog.
Or is your issue beyond that, perhaps related to using another encoder?

How to setup a new pixel aspect ratio?

Hi!
I created project in 1020x1080, ad for this res I need pixel aspect ratio 3,21:1.
Do You have solution how to achieve it?
best regards
Marcin

If your project is going to be displayed on two screens you need to know how it is going to be played back. If you are setting up synchronized playback of two video files set up your comp at 2X as wide as HD (3840 X 1080) but create two rendering comps that are standard HD and drag the 2X comp in each as a nested comp and adjust the position or anchor point to give you a left and right render.
If you are planning to setup the computer that plays back this file with two monitors then first you have to make sure that you can straddle the playback across both monitors. If so, then just render your 2X comp using a data rate that your media player will handle.
If you are not doing the playback then you MUST check with the client's equipment provider for specifications. Systems designed for playback on multiple screens do not necessarily follow any set standard you you must get the specifications from the supplier or your work product will only have a small chance of being usable.

Working with several video formats aspect ratios need help...

Hi folks I have searched around quite a bit but I need more specific advice based my situation...I am editing a docu about Japanese biker gangs shot on several different SD cameras:
MY FOOTAGE
1.Sony Vx-2000 fitted with a Century Optics 16:9 converter lens bayonet mounted
2.Canon Xl2 shot in 16:9 mode
But I also have:
ARCHIVAL/ACQUIRED FOOTAGE
1. Contributor's camera SD 4:3 aspect ratio
2.Contributor's camera SD 16:9 aspect ratio
3. Transferred from VHS into SD 4:3 aspect ratio
I would like to standardize the aspect ratio for the project but I am getting confused as sometimes the footage shot on the sony (which should be true 16:9) appears elongated vertically at times.
Are my settings off?
Also, I have "title safe" wireframe on in the Canvas and the images all exceed the outer box. I don't have a TV so it's hard to check what (if anything) gets
lost. I guees most TVs can handle 16:9 without letterboxing....
Do I have to worry about that? Which box should I crop to if I letterbox? The out or inner? Or the outside of the screen? Should I just letterbox the whole project?
BTW eventually I am planning on Uprezing the project to HD using Magic Bullet when outputting.
The overall question is: Who has experience dealing with multiple aspect ratios in one timeline? Can you offer any advice on a work flow to output successfully?

Sorry to butt in, haven't read the entire thread.
Suggest you plan from the beginning to create one timeline but encode for two separate output formats.
Standard procedure for bringing multiple formats is to convert them to a single format as they are ingested. Decide early what the timeline format will be and transcode everything to that codec before anything is brought into the timeline.
When your project goesgolden, export a single self-contained movie and take that to Compressor to create release movies that will be played on Blu-ray, SD DVD, online, or in Power Point, whatever you need.
bogiesan
Message was edited by: David Bogie Chq-1

Changing monitor resolution with proper aspect ratio

My project size is 800x600 and I wanted to provide an option to the user to change their monitor resolution at 800x600 by clicking on button. I have also planned to do it by using buddy api xtra, and already tested it. The problem is, when I am doing this on a PC with panoramic monitor (native resolution 1920x1080), it got stretched. I know it's very natural (as the aspect ratio has changed ) and I can get it in shape by squeeze the width using 'draw.rect'.
I noticed, there are some PCs with advanced display card that don't even get stretched, but shows the 800x600 resolution in proper aspect ratio by keeping the extra space black both sides. And I don't need to write any further codes (squeeze the width using 'draw.rect') to keep it in shape.
The real problem starts here, I can't able to filter the above situations by any logical means. I wanted to write codes only for the PCs that get stretched, but I didn't able to find any support from Director to determine which type of display card has been attached. I need to know whether it will get stretched, or the display card can able to manage the aspect ratio.
Any one have any solution in this matter?
Please don't hesitate to ask if you need any more info.

Hello handler
If you talking about this kind of thing...
https://forums.adobe.com/message/5773207
search for..... _movie.stage.drawRect = _system.deskTopRectList[1] & _movie.stage.rect = _system.deskTopRectList[1]
You don't need an xtra to change the resolutions - but you do have to work a few things - I tend to use flash text because it scales better.
regards
milky

Need help changing size and aspect ratio for 500+ images

Thank you for reading this! I have about 500 images of people in different poses. They're all extracted on a transparency as PNGs. They vary in aspect ratio, dimensions and position of the person within the frame - for some the feet are very close to the bottom of the frame and for some, they're higher up. I need to equalize all 3 of these qualities, so that if superimposed, they look like a video unfolding with the same zoom. My ideal size would be 800x800 at 300ppi.
Is there a way to batch even a part of the process and keep the png format? I had the images in PSD initially but they were too massive so creating catalogs with them was prohibitive.
If not possible to do a batch, what would be the best (easiest) and fastest way to do it? I'm thinking that maybe creating some template where an oval shape the size of the head can help create consistency of the size of the person and a line that helps set up the distance from the bottom?
I so appreciate any help you have to offer. Part of my problem is that I don't know what these processes are called so I don't even know what to search for. If you can even name the actions that I need, it would be of great help. I already paid a designer to do the extraction and they were supposed to do this formatting as well and they didn't so my budget is shot. I'm hoping that if I understand what the steps are, I can do them myself.
Thank you!

If you download my crafting actions package you can record an action that uses one of my plug-in scripts to do that process. You could then batch that action and process your 500 png image files.
Crafting Actions Package UPDATED Aug 10, 2014 Added Conditional Action steps to Action Palette Tips.
Contains
Action Actions Palette Tips.txt
Action Creation Guidelines.txt
Action Dealing with Image Size.txt
Action Enhanced via Scripted Photoshop Functions.txt
CraftedActions.atn Sample Action set includes an example Watermarking action
Sample Actions.txt Photoshop CraftedActions set saved as a text file.
More then a dozen Scripts for use in actions
Example
Download
Step 1 Select layers transparency
Step 2 Copy
Step 3 Paste
Step 4 Select all
Step 5 Align Layer s to selection vertical center
Step 6 Align Layer s to selection horizontal center
Step 7 Select bottom Layer
Step 8 delete current layer
Ste9 9 Fille>Automate>AspectRatopSelection... In the dialog set 1 1 ratio center rectangle replace selection feather 0
Step 10 Image Crop
Step 11 File Automate>Fit Image. In dialog enter width and height 800
Step 12 Image size in the dialog uncheck Resample and enter 300 in the resolution field.
I'm sure the should work you mane not need the copy paste and it depends on how Photoshop treats the PNG layer the canvas size or just the pixels.
This may also work
Step 1 Select all
Step 2 Align Layer s to selection vertical center
Step 3 Align Layer s to selection horizontal center
Ste9 4 Fille>Automate>AspectRatopSelection... In the dialog set 1 1 ratio center rectangle replace selection feather 0
Step 5 Image Crop
Step 6 File Automate>Fit Image. In dialog enter width and height 800
Step 7 Image size in the dialog uncheck Resample and enter 300 in the resolution field.

How to keep aspect ratio for different sized resolutions?

If I have a 1280 x 800 resolution widescreen moniter, and I have this fullscreen game that likes to run in 800 x 600 but I don't like the way that the game stretches across the whole widescreen moniter. The only way for me to keep everything in a good aspect ratio is to put my resolution at 1280 x 800 but the game doesn't like that.
Would there be a way to set it so that the 800 x 600 resolution is set to have the correct aspect ratio rather than being stretched across the widescreen? ie, so it looks like a square with black spots on both sides.
I heard that a modeline generator would be the thing I want, but I'm not sure how I should go about this stuff. If you have any reading on it, please give it to me.

Thank you very much. I never thought to look in the BIOS.
There wasn't an option to keep aspect ratio and stretch but I was able to center it rather than stretching.
Now my framebuffer boot up got centered, I need to find out how to make the framebuffer bootup be 1280x800 rather than 1024x768. This should be simple, but the guide in the sample menu.lst only gives square-y resolutions.

How can I edit DVCPROHD in FCPX? Need to Adjust Aspect Ratio

I have 5TB of footage for a sitcom I'm about to start editing. It's all been ingested and organized in FCPX event browser. However, it appears the FCPX won't allow the change of aspect ratio for the 1280x1080 footage. The DVCPROHD footage appears squished. I need to make MultiCams out of all the scenes shot film style and need to be able to view it at a correct aspect ratio not only in the timeline, but in the Event browser playback as well - so I can make informed decisions on which takes to use in the edit. I've seen recommendations for people creating "custom resolution" timesline by ingesting a pre-made video clip that's been customized in motion, but that wont' fix my problem. There has to be a way to natively edit DVCPROHD footage. Can some please help with suggestions??

Not by using the IMAQ WindTools directly. One idea is to draw a rectangled ROI first (using ), then modify it programmatically using the IMAQ ROI functions ...
HTH,
Michael

Help with aspect ratio and resolution nightmare

I am currently working on a documentary and all the footage I was given are in different formats an resolutions. Some are in 720 x 480 others in much larger aspect ratios. Some are standard SD some are HD
is there any way to conform all of these together, or any tips? what about exporting? any help would be appreciated.
thanks

What's your final delivery format?
What I do, and I usually have some HDV to mix with DV is to put everything on a ProRes 422 sequence with the setting to the highest resolution I have to start with (usually HDV 1440x1080) but I don't let FCP automatically change the time line or covert anything until I do a render. Then I finally do a render all and FCP up rezzes stuff when it renders. I use very little of the DV stuff (it's a backup when I need something that the HDV cams didn't video the way I need, such as both HDV cams moving to a point of view at the same time).
If you don't need to intercut the various pieces (that is, if you can edit each one as an individual piece in its owns sequence, then just stitch them together end to end at the end), then I create each one in its own sequence, and let FCP change the sequence settings when I drop the video into it. Then I stitch it together when I get ready to make the DVD.
My DVD's are all SD, so I use compressor to downrez and compress: then they are all in the same resolution, etc. and I stitch it together in DVD SP as stories, or just drop them into the same video line, end to end.
Eddie O

Need camcorder with an aspect ratio greater than1,920x1,080 format.

Some years ago, I saw an ad for a Canon camcorder with an aspect ratio greater than the standard 2:1 ratio (1,920x1,080) format. It boasted a true cinemascope format (16:9?) Is there something like that available today? Or do I have to go to a professional unit? Thanks for any help.

Hi ridgerider,
Thank you for posting. The 1920 x 1080 resolution that our current camcorder models shoot at is a Full HD 16:9 aspect ratio resolution. There is no need to move into a professional level model to get Full HD 16:9 video, unless a more professional level model is something you are looking for.
If this is a time sensitive-matter, additional support options are available at Contact Us.
Did this answer your question? Please click the Accept as Solution button so that others may find the answer as well.

Need resolution & aspect ratio advice

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for