Need sodium vapor frequency specific filter something better than plain  orange

Somebody tell the LIGHTROOM PHOTOSHOP TEAM THAT WE NEED A FREQUENCY SPECIFIC FILTER THAT TARGETS THE SODIUM VAPOR SPECIFIC FREQUENCY TO FILTER OUT THAT LIGHT POLLUTION IMMEDIATELY

Just click Black & White. You cannot create with a filter what's not there in the first place.
When you filter out all of that specific frequeny, no normal color information will remain. You'll only retain the contrast information (which you can bump nicely with Clarity).
P.S. I think something went wrong with your Caps Lock or Shift key, maybe you should check it for glue or chewing gum.

Similar Messages

  • Something better than the 'shear' filter..

    Hi, I am looking for something better than this primitive 'shear' filter. I need to shape an image with the help of a curve, just like in shear, but more professional than just with a vertical line inside a teeny-weeny window... Any ideas..? Curently working in Photoshop CS3.

    How can I add more curve points in Warp..?
    Unfortunately one can not, therefore the Illustrator Envelope Distort-recommendation.
    CS5 is supposed to offer improvements in this field … but no release-date has been announced yet.

  • Creating something better than Photoshop CC ?

    The basic CC concept  just doesn't work for many people, including myself. Bottom line: there must be a  perpetual license option for a basic photo image editing program. For many photographers, Photoshop Elements just isn't robust enough. My guess is that other companies will jump into this huge new market, but that's going to take time.
    It looks like Adobe is the only company in the position to produce a solution in the short term. So let's start there.
    Over at the Kelby Blog and NAPP (the "Photoshop Guys," NAPP memebers and Blog contributors) they are actually working on a product concept to present to Adobe in response to CC. It's initially being called "LightShop" and its basic premise is to be a stripped-down Photoshop CC that integrates with Lightroom.  It will have minimal Type, no 3D, no video, and less special effects and other bloat -- just a clear Lightroom-like interface that is smooth and fast. Most important, it sells as a perpetual license like Lightroom, for under $200. This concept sounds interesting -- if you're into Lightroom. I'm not.
    Another idea is for Adobe to offer something like a Photoshop Elements "Extended Edition." Now that they have killed the Standard Edition of Photoshop, a product like that would not encroach upon the now professional market focus of Photoshop CC. It would be relatively easy to produce because most of the code is already in Photoshop Elements for more advanced features  -- it's just turned off. ACR already comes with Elements, and Bridge could be included as before.  If some of the deficiencies of standard Elements could be addressed, and some of the consumer oriented bling thrown out, then it could be ideal for amateur to semi-pro photographers. Photoshop plug-ins would work as they do now. Sell a perpetual license for under $200, and I think a lot of non-CC customers would be happy. An upgrade from CS3 onwards would be great too, for maybe $100.
    But exactly what features would be best for a Photoshop CC alternative product? Is 16-bit necessary if you are global-editing RAW in ACR or Lightroom? Can you really tell the difference in a print or on the Web? What about Blend Modes -- do we need that many? How about just one sharpening filter -- the upcoming version of Smart Sharpen?

    You bring up a great point. Lets say when we eventually die and lets say our family or even clients want to see what we have done. Adobe with cc in a way has cut off your legacy by not having a perpetual program that can automatically open your files. Which is different from saving as older file type.
    If cc had more price options i would be very temped to join it. Ither a 30-40$/month plan for say a suite as they have done for years or pick your favorite 3 programs and 1-2 minior ones like bridge or acrobat. I would also like to see a 10-15/month plan for just 1 program but that is not a special offer but long standing price. Im sure the cc price will change within the next 12 months which is for good or bad why you can only lock in a 1 year plan. It would be nice if like a phone you could lock in your plan price for 2 years. At least you would know what to expect. Adobe should look at phone subscriptions and see how we get people to pay 90/month for a phone which for many is a toy and they cant get people to pay 50/month for tools. With phones when you renew your contract gennerally every 2 years you get a massive discount on some new phones and some will actaully be free or upto 70% off. Adobe shoudl consider this. The more adobe products you have the bigger your renew discount should be. They could do it as 2 year contract or have several durations besides monthly and yearly. Have a 6 month, 18 and 24 month. Say you pay 50/month for your contract duration of 1 year, when it comes time to renew you should have a discount lets say 10-20% off which would be 40-45$ which is handy. If you upgrade to cc and have a suite you should have a biggerest discount than just 1 program say instead of 40/month like 30/month for that contract duration and if you have master collection maybe 20/month for the duration. Then with those 2 suites when its time to renew still give a discount but maybe less. Maybe a suite becomes 40/month and master 30/month but give more discount than those who just renewed. Give us what feels like incentives not punishments.
    Ya having 3 almost 4 photoshops was getting a big crazy. Photoshop extended, photohop, photoshop elements and light room. I guess its good for adobe to consolidate but they could have done it with out the cloud. Just make elements and lightroom merged and bump up the price maybe 40%. I think thats fair. Similarly with photoshop and extended, merge the 2 and increase price to 1/2 way between both. Starts getting weird when you have many overlapping things. Like web design has dream weaver and muse. I would love to get that as 1 program or a package deal since they do the same thing but go about it differently. Merge them as 1 and increase price 40%. Same with indesign and incopy, merge them together and increase price 40%. This will make each program stronger and a better buy. Just good house keeping to simplify. Adobe offers so many things I honestly dont know what some of their new things like fusion do. Many have only been around 1-2 years and its becoming complicated to know about all their stuff especially when they start overlapping.
    Good luck adobe. I do love you but you are breaking my heart. I want to stay but you need to make some changes to help me want to.

  • Email Set-up...something better than Outlook Express 4.5?

    Happy New Year ~
    I'm trying to set up about 3 email accounts on an OLD iBook Blueberry running OS 8.6. It has Outlook Express 4.5 installed on it, and though it did "take" one of the email addresses yesterday (it was able to download mail from the server, but I didn't test sending any mail out), it hasn't been able to send/receive at all today. I'm not real familiar with Outlook, so don't know if I'm missing something. I tried checking two boxes that said things like: "Requires secure SSL/POP" because I do have passwords that are involved in accessing the server account, but still nothing.
    The computer did connect to the internet via ethernet and DSL, though, so that's not the problem.
    Anyway -- after all this, I'm wondering if there's any simpler email program I can maybe try downloading and using? Or any other suggestions?
    (I'm just spoiled, having been graced with an iBookG4 less than a year ago - my first Mac - and loving Panther and OS X..I'd love to upgrade to Tiger as soon as my budget allows)
    Thanks for any and all insight.
    iBook Blueberry   Mac OS 8.6 or Earlier   G3, 300MHz, 32MB DSRAM, OS 8.6

    Hi aToast...
    Yikes! ...your comment brings back a lot of memories - good and bad
    For some reason I do remember that you shouldn't have to check off the 'Requires Secure SSL/POP'. Aside from that just make sure you have both your incoming/outgoing 'mail server' and of course your password typed correctly.
    There are other programs you could try (I remember trying others but Outlook was always the best for me) ...take a look under the 'classic apps' on the Pure-Mac site for example - http://pure-mac.com/email.html
    If you could get up to os 9.2.2 then try the Mozilla Suite - that would be my pick for best classic browser and email combo.
    ibook Clamshell (Indigo)   Mac OS X (10.3.9)   40Gig - 320Ram - DVD/CDRW

  • Is there something better than CMD+Z for mass UNDOs?

    After a month of superb Macprovideo training in FCPX and futile searches of the "worthless" FCPX help[less] document, I cannot find more on a VERY BASIC subject that pertains to everybody using FCPX.
    EDITING HISTORY:  Since we have NO control over our SAVES,  how do you undo the last 50 changes --or-- undo everything since 10am?  Do I have to hit CMD+Z until I get callouses?   I did see a reference to TIMELINE HISTORY but the doc is skimpy & doesn't  seem relevant.
    If there is a window that shows a chronological order of changes & time with the option to UNDO, that would be great.   If I've missed it, please advise.
    Thank you for time & thoughts.
    -Dale

    Thank you R&B, you're an officer & a gentleman.
    BTY- I can never figure out why folks on this (and all other forums) have ALIAS names.  If they don't know you by your real name, then I can't see the purpose of an alias.

  • Anyne know something better than iLap? Please

    just bought one. still feelin some major heat coming off the laptop. def can't keep it on my lap for long.
    anyone heard of belkin cushtop? other?
    thnx

    well, i use both idrum and guru. guru is crazy cool with alot if the stuff it can do, way too much. but to hit the highlites and comparison to ultrabeat(mainly the things it does that UB doesnt):
    you have a sound browser where you can click the sounds and hear them and not blindy have to load samples in
    the patterns are easily drag-able into the instrument track one created(stylus style)
    the editing PER HIT in the patterns is crazy as well, can edit shift(if youd like that beat not exactly ON the grid, you can slide its position around) as well as any of the other parameters can be tweaked per beat (filtering, pitch, volume, pan, sample-start point and repeat triggers for glitch effect)
    the application of 'feels' you can use (MPC swings, etc...)
    there really is alot you can do with it, waaaay more in depth than idrum and waaaaay easier to use the UB:-)
    my 2 cents!

  • Something Better than iWeb?

    I'm looking for a website program for the Mac that is as easy as iWeb but can build sites more like dreamweaver. I don't like iWeb because it's too private, family, media, mac like. Are there any programs for the Mac other than iWeb that are like this? (Without the confusing HTML).

    Sandvox is fairly similar to iWeb and has a Pro version with added features...
    http://www.karelia.com/
    You could also have a look at Goldfish...
    http://www.fishbeam.com/en/goldfish/
    Shutterbug has a kind of quirky interface but has a lot of good features and is inexpensive....
    http://xtralean.com/SBOverview.html

  • Test-to-speech program--anything better than  Voice Dream Reader? I have AMD and NEED the serviced.

    I have AMD and need a text-to-speech reader; anythiung better than Voice Dream Reader? HELP!!

    My son uses Touch Chat. It wworks great for him.  he is 14 years old and has been using it for 2 years.  You can set up several different pages to ease navigations.

  • Boot into something other than hard drive

    I'm having problems partitioning in boot camp, so I read that I should defrag my drive. I'm getting the error because it can't move certain files.
    So I'm using iDefrag, but it won't let me use most of the defrag options because I'm using the disk it is defraging. I tried to boot using the leopard disk that came with my macbook, but I can only use certain programs while this disk is open.
    What do I need to do to boot into something other than the hard drive to defrag?

    Hi again,
    found this procedure http://www.bradbergeron.com/2006/11/howto-install-and-boot-os-x-on-a-flash-drive / to install and boot a basic OSX on an USB Memory Stick.
    Since this How-To was written for OSX Tiger you might consider getting a bigger sized USB-Stick for the space OSX Leopard needs.
    Regards
    Stefan
    Message was edited by: Fortuny

  • Is mackeeper a good application to use? or is there something better?

    my coputer is real junked up and i ran mackeeper and it says to fix all 2000 problems i need to activate it, is it a crediblle program and worth activation? or is there something better?

    Do not install MacKeeper (and how to uninstall it if you have):
    https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-3036
    (Please note that references to the original developers, Zeobit, should now refer to Kromtech Alliance Corp, who acquired MacKeeper and PCKeeper from ZeoBit LLC in early 2013.

  • How to locate clip within timeline containing specific filter

    Hi,
    I would like to locate in my timeline all the clips that contain a specific filter (in this particular occasion, MERCALI filter). But my timeline contains hundreds of clips. How do I locate the ones I am looking for without having to click on each and everyone of the cut clips?
    Thank you.

    That just isn't something that anyone asked for. Or not enough people, in any case.
    We have asked for a way to eliminate all filters.
    After Effects has a hotkey to show all modified parameters, so Premiere Pro could certainly have it. Put in a feature request.

  • PS CS3 Noise Filter better than PSElements 6 Noise Filter ?

    PS CS3 Noise Filter better than PSElements 6 Noise Filter ?

    I appreciate very much you responding and clarifying to see if somebody else does know.
    Actually the Noise Filter has five selections to choose from.
    I'm most interested in the Dust & Scratches tool. And, very surprised not to find a lot of 'discussion' about it, in fact almost none.
    This whole Dust & Scratches Removal thing has got me scratching my butt trying to figure out if any of it by any software is NOT mostly hype.
    (long reply follows)
    "Retouching" tools like Dust & Scratches Removal seem to be useable only on a 1-by-1 file basis, with lots of 'manual' tweeking required, not as an Auto function to batches of lots of files at the same time.
    Which in hindsight from experiences and what I've learned from those, makes sense, but, does not help me.
    I have now concluded that 'retouching' some things like Dust & Scratches can only be done on a 1-file-at-a-time basis and takes quite a bit of 'manual' tweeking effort. And works IF one is capable of understanding how to do it. Otherwise, it - meaning me - only seems to make things worse instead of better.
    My journey started last year when I got a German Braun Slide Scanner that included ICE, as well as Noise Reduction, which, like the included GEM and ROC only seemed to make things worse instead of better, especially worse when applying the same settings to every slide being scanned.
    I have to process 100s or 1,000s of slides, and soon old photos too, at a price that most people can or are willing to pay, which is very low because of the numbers of slides and photos involved, so it's imperative for me to have Auto Tools to apply to batches of files, instead of spending a lot of time 'manually' tweeking each and every file one at a time.
    With the scanner, the ICE and other tools can only be used during the actual scanning of each slide, not after scanning on the resulting file. And those 'tools' invariably remove too much, details of faces and other stuff one wants to preserve, and fuzzy the focus.
    The settings that work on the very first slide or photo do not work for any other. So, I had to turn off those tools altogether.
    There was a software suite recommended for the scanner for after-scanning work, which was a European version of Photoshop, costing about as much as PS, but from the Trial version I couldn't see any benefit to getting it.
    I tried various Retouching programs for much less money, many not worth even trying, and again, even for those that did do what I needed to any degree, ran in to the same thing. Way too much time required for 'manually' tweeking each and every file 1 at a time, and never getting a good result because I'm no good at doing that.
    THEN I recently got a Kodak Photo Scanner that does photos like the German scanner does slides, only, it does photos a LOT faster. It will scan up to 20 pre-loaded standard thickness photos of various sizes and orientations - in about 25 seconds.
    But again, the problem with Dust & Scratches.
    There's a program suite for after-scanning 'retouching' available for the Kodak Photo Scanner - but they want $ 700 for that, and it's pretty much a clone of Photoshop.
    SO,
    when I saw the comparison list between PS CS3 and the Extended version saying the Extended has a better Noise Filter,
    It got me wondering..........

  • Hardware setup advice needed for 2 track 'better than demo' sound recording

    I've enjoyed browsing the forums and seeing of the good help that people get here. Hopefully, I'll be next.
    I have an accoustic guitar (Taylor 314-CE, Expression System) with onboard pre-amp, cable is 1/4 from guitar to XLR
    I have a dynamic mic, with XLR to 1/4 cable
    Key issues so far:
    (1) lack of a mic pre-amp
    Right now I've got a unidirectional dynamic mic from RadioShack that was a gift. I think it cost $50, so I know it wasn't the cheapest one in the store. Of course using it with GB and line in, you have to practically swallow the mic and turn the levels up to get anything. So I don't really know enough about it's quality yet.
    (2) difficulty recording guitar
    It seems like I either get clipping or not enough input, so I end up with lots of noise relative to a quiet guitar track. To avoid clipping, I have the pre-amp on the guitar set way down, and the track volume way down too. Just doesn't seem that great.
    (3) one track a time
    So I need a system that will allow me to record two tracks at the same time, mic and guitar (not mic'd), and I am looking for 'better than demo' sound.
    Have I got this right:
    Behringer UB502 ($30) would work? - since my mic is dynamic, I don't need phantom power (available on UB802 ($40)). Will I need a new mic cable, XLR to XLR, or can I use the XLR to 1/4 cable? Would an XLR to XLR be better?
    How is the Behringer connected to iMac? USB? Firewire? I didn't see anything included - Do I need to purchase cabling separately?
    Is the sound quality going to be good enough for Home CD quality recording? If not, to what do I have to step up to? Firepod at $600? Its track count is overkill for me, but I need good sound, too, so maybe... Or is there something in between that offers great sound and just a few inputs?
    How much of a difference would a condenser mic be? Am I right that with that type of mic, I need phantom power on the (mixer / interface - which is it?) Have seen recommendations for MXL 990 ($60) and Rode NT1000 ($300).
    That's about it. Hope you can help.

    Nice guitar. Radio Shack mic were made by Shure not sure if they still are. A cheap mixer will just plug into the line in jack just a matter of getting the right plugs an cables. I would use a xlr cable pretty cheap from online music stores. You may want to consider a usb interface they tend to be a little cheaper then firewire check M-Audio. Condenser mic are great but they pick up everything and you should be fine with you mic you have and the fine onboard system taylor uses.

  • Need to use a specific windows keyboard shortcut on Mac

    I need to use a specific keyboard shortcut for a program that I am running (via Parallels) but the same keyboard shortcut is used in OS X to take a screen shot of a window via dashboard, which takes precedence over the command I am attempting to use.
    The keyboard shortcut in "Windows-Speak" is Shift-Ctrl-W.  What are my options here? Can I deactivate that shortcut in OS X?

    CrossOver is a program that lets you run some Windows software withhout installing Windows. The emphasis is on some. At their website Crossover rates the supported software on a scale from Bronze to Gold - if the program you need to run is supported at the Gold standard you will probably be okay. Silver and Bronze ratings means the rated Windows software will run but with glitches or even missing functionality. (Silver being better support than Bronze, obviously.)
    Virtualization solutions such as VirtualBox (or the more capable and feature laden Parallels Desktop and VMWare Fusion) let you install another operating system (and software) to use at the same time as you use your Mac software. It is a nifty solution and while virtualization isn't quite as fast as running an OS totally native (BootCamp) the speed hit isn't all that significant and affects graphics rendering more than anything else.
    I'm an IT instructor and software trainer and about 80% of this work involves Windows software. I do it using a Mac computer running Windows in Parallels Desktop. If it weren't for the Apple logo on my notebook no one would know I'm using a Mac - and the notebook in virtualization feels faster than the cheap Dell computers we use.

  • How do I reorder songs in a playlist in the new itunes??? I can no longer just click and drag. When I click, it doesn't move!!!! Need help ASAP- trying to prepare for an aerobics class and need songs in a specific order!

    How do I reorder songs in a playlist in the new itunes??? I can no longer just click and drag. When I click, it doesn't move!!!! Need help ASAP- trying to prepare for an aerobics class and need songs in a specific order!

    Vera,
    Use View > View Options, and set 'Sort By" to "Manual Order."
    Then you will be able to drag-n-drop songs up and down the list.

Maybe you are looking for