Need to check GR quantity should be less than PO quantity
Hi,
We have to make sure that the net GR quantity shouldn't be greater than PO quantity (considering one PO line can have more than one GR and GR returns) . Can we achive this by configuration? I tried using Tolerance limits, but it didn't work as I expected, but not sure what values / percentage to be maintained to make it work, if it is for this purpose.
If it is not possible by configuration, I am thinking of using user exit for the same. If anyone knows, please let me know. Thanks,
Regards,
Sundar.
if you have a overdelivery tolerance set in the PO then remove it
if you have a flag for unlimted overdelivery, then remove this one too.
try MIGO for a quantity that will exceed PO quantity.
you shuold get an error message.
if it is a warning, then you might need to change the attributes of teh message to error.
Similar Messages
-
Excise invoice quantity cannot be less than the quantity received
Hi,
I have done MIGO with part 1 entry but while doing J1IEX, I am getting an error message 4F109 : Excise invoice quantity cannot be less than the quantity received.
Please note that we have done MIGO with 5000 qty. and doing J1IEX with short 3000 qty.
Regards.Hi,
For this case of "Part I" selected during GR, you need to create Excise invoice thro J1IEX -> Capture Excise Invoice -> Good receipt (use the material document number), which will complete the part II posting. Then you can proceed with MIRO.
With regards,
Jeeva. -
ERROR: PGI in delivery with picked quantity less than delivery quantity
Hi Friends!
I need your help, i have the following situation:
Outbound Delivery with batch position:
90001 Mat DD3450 Picked Delivery Quantity=98 and Picked quantity=84
Overall Pick Status = "B"
Overall WM Status = "C"
The outbound delivery was posted completely and the following documents was generated:
WMS transfer order: With 84 UN in quantity
Material document: With 98 UN in quantity
Invoice: With 98 UN billed
The question is how was posible to generated the PGI for the outbound delivery when the picked quantity was less than delivery quantity? is a SAP program error?
Thanks
Best regards
Enriquebenito,
Check your Picking Confirmation config. as you are using WM/Lean WM, then your Shipping Point should have a mandatory requirement to confirm all TO's. The confirmation should update the Picking Status and the Overall GI Status to 'C' (with any relevant changes to the picked qty). Give that a go.
Cheers,
Paul... -
Message no. RM109 The quantity at RP is less than the quantity at next RP
Hello everyone,
I am getting an error in regards to a reporting point. I tried going into MF4R to reset the reporting points and when I do I get the following message:
The quantity at RP 0220 is less than the quantity at the next RP
Message no. RM109
Diagnosis
The reporting point structure is inconsistent as at reporting point 0220, the backflush quantity is less than at the subsequent reporting point. In a consistent backflush, the quantity at a subsequent reporting point (work in process) always less than or equal to the quantity at the previous reporting point.
Procedure
Check the reporting point stocks using transaction MF26. Post any missing quantities at previous reporting points.
I have went into MF26 and "Yes" reporting point 0220 is less than the following reporting point. My question is... how do I fix this? Any help will be greatly appreciated.Good morning Raj,
Here is what MF26 is showing:
614830 0033 0001 W3300
0010 84 PC
0020 38 PC
0030 38 PC
0040 38 PC
0050 38 PC
0060 84 PC
0070 84 PC
0080 84 PC
0090 84 PC
0100 38 PC
0110 84 PC
0130 38 PC
0140 38 PC
0150 38 PC
0155 84 PC
0160 38 PC
0165 84 PC
0170 84 PC
0180 38 PC
0185 84 PC
0190 84 PC
0200 38 PC
0210 38 PC
0220 38 PC
0225 84 PC
0230 84 PC
0240 84 PC
0245 84 PC
0246 84 PC
0250 84 PC
0260 84 PC
0270 84 PC
0280 84 PC
0290 84 PC
As you can see RP 0220 shows only 38 pcs RP 0225 and up shows 84 pcs. Using MFBF I backflushed 46 pcs to RP 0220 to make it equal to the 84 pcs. But, when I went back into MF26 RP 0220 still shows 38 pcs.
Thank you for your help!
Rhonda -
PR Date Should be less than PO date
Hi
I have done the change in message type to control PO date at the time of creation, now PO can be created only in current date but if at a later stage somebody has been created one more PR and change the PO and add one more line item from this PR then PR date is greater than PO date.
So this is objectionable and I want to control this i.e. PR date should be less than PO date.
Please guide how can i achieve this?
Regards
Ajay GoelHello,
Ajay if u you want to restrict the PO can be created only in current date then u can take help of your ABAPER because its possible through BADI.
If you want to add the other line item in PO Or Use Tcode Me22n you can not change the document date that time bcoz its disable check it. -
SALE ORDER QUANTITY LESS THAN DELIVERY QUANTITY ? NO CECK IN SAP ??
Hello friends,
I created a sales order of quantity 10 , having two material codes each having quantity 4 and 6 . i created delivery for the one by putting delivered quantity 4 and save , then i created delivery for second and put delivered quantity 8 which was greater than the sale order quantity left ,system saved the delivery and didn't popped any error message.
Does SAP have options to over come this mistake by end users.
regardsDear Joshi,
Please get in touch with your abap er as there user exits which can be written to avoid this situation.
Let me explain you further one more situation.
First one, Your query is if for item A ord qty is 6 the system saved the delivery with 8 qty which is greater than ordered quantity. I know the gives a warning doing this.
Second Situation :
Say item A ordered qty is 5, and i made a delivery for 3 and saved it. Now the open quantity on the order is only 2. (5 -3 =2). But one of our users reduced the ordered quantity to 2 despite saving a delivery with quantity 3.
so the situation is ord qty is 2 and delivered is 3 qty. which is again wrong. But while reducing the ordered quantity less than the delivered quantity the system gives a warning message telling " ORDERED QUANTITY IS LESS THAN DELIVERED QUANTITY ".
Also just imagine we made delivery for qty 5 and invoiced it.After which you reduced the delivered quantity to say 3. So delivered is 3 but invoiced is 5.
Hence for these kinds of practical problems we have addressed them through user exits with the help of our ABAP'ers by turning those warning messages into error messages by selecting the suitable message class.
Hope the explanation helps you. And thanks for all your patient reading.
Reward points if useful.
Thanks & Regards
Sadhu Kishore -
Confirmed quantity should come equal to order quantity
Hi Friends,
I have created one sales order and when I am going thruGo to>item data-->schedule lines then confirmed quantity is showing zero(0).
I want that confirmed quantity should come equal to order quantity.
RegardsHi friends,
When I am trying with mov. type 561 or other and entering the material ,quantity,st. location and saving then getting the below error.
Any pointers.
G/L account 11500888 blocked for posting in company code 730
Message no. M7 161
Diagnosis
No postings can be made to a G/L account that is blocked.
Procedure
Determine whether another G/L account is suitable for the transaction.
Inform the individual or section responsible for G/L accounts in the relevant company code.
2.Also if I am trying with other matrl( having sufficient unrestricted stock available) then for that also quantities are not matching. why like this ?
Regards
Edited by: Amit Kumar on Nov 7, 2008 5:07 AM -
End date should not less than Start date, else CLEAR it
Hello
I put CONTRACT START DATE and CONTRACT END DATE fields on the form. These 2 objects (Date/Time objjects) i pulled them from Satndard tab of pallette and dropped on my layout page design, fine.
Now, am trying to put a validation that the end dat eshould not lower than start date, so, i got a thread as below from Niall,
http://forums.adobe.com/message/1909551
and i did my FormCalc coding under EXIT event of END DATE field as below,
// Pls. note this FormCalc
// End date should not less than Start date, else CLEAR it - Begin
var stDate
var endDate
stDate = xfa.resolveNode("CUSTOMER.Page31_Contracts.Con_Whole_Page.CON_Basic_Info.CON_START_DATE") .rawValue
endDate = xfa.resolveNode("CUSTOMER.Page31_Contracts.Con_Whole_Page.CON_Basic_Info.CON_END_DATE").r awValue
if (stDate > endDate) then
xfa.host.messageBox("End date is lower than Start date! End date is cleared")
xfa.resolveNode("CUSTOMER.Page31_Contracts.Con_Whole_Page.CON_Basic_Info.CON_END_DATE").r awValue = null
endif
// End date should not less than Start date, else CLEAR it - End
I tried in VALIDATE, CALCULATE, CHANGE events of END DATE, but nothing working!!
PLs. let me kow how can i achieve my requirement? I am anewbie,
Thank youIf you use the exit event, you will probably have to have the same code on both the start and end date fields since they have a dependancy on each other. Maybe better to try the validate event of the end date so that if either field is changed the event gets fired. You can try the following for validate event
// Pls. note this FormCalc
// End date should not less than Start date, else CLEAR it - Begin
var stDate
var endDate
stDate = CON_START_DATE.rawValue
endDate = $.rawValue
if ( HasValue(endDate) ) then
if (stDate > endDate) then
xfa.host.messageBox("End date is lower than Start date! End date is cleared")
$.rawValue = null
endif
endif
1
// End date should not less than Start date, else CLEAR it - End -
Contract End date should not less than Start date, else CLEAR it
Hello
I put CONTRACT START DATE and CONTRACT END DATE fields on the form. These 2 objects (Date/Time objjects) i pulled them from Satndard tab of pallette and dropped on my layout page design, fine.
Now, am trying to put a validation that the end dat eshould not lower than start date, so, i got a thread as below from Niall,
http://forums.adobe.com/message/1909551
and i did my FormCalc coding under EXIT event of END DATE field as below,
// Pls. note this FormCalc
// End date should not less than Start date, else CLEAR it - Begin
var stDate
var endDate
stDate = xfa.resolveNode("CUSTOMER.Page31_Contracts.Con_Whole_Page.CON_Basic_Info.CON_START_DATE") .rawValue
endDate = xfa.resolveNode("CUSTOMER.Page31_Contracts.Con_Whole_Page.CON_Basic_Info.CON_END_DATE").r awValue
if (stDate > endDate) then
xfa.host.messageBox("End date is lower than Start date! End date is cleared")
xfa.resolveNode("CUSTOMER.Page31_Contracts.Con_Whole_Page.CON_Basic_Info.CON_END_DATE").r awValue = null
endif
// End date should not less than Start date, else CLEAR it - End
I tried in VALIDATE, CALCULATE, CHANGE events of END DATE, but nothing working!!
PLs. let me kow how can i achieve my requirement? I am anewbie,
Thank youhttp://forums.adobe.com/message/4264933#4264933
-
Outbound Quantity should be equal to or less than STO quantity.
Dear Gurus,
My client have problem regarding the quantity in Outbound deliveries.
Suppose in STO quantity is 100, user is making partial Outbound Delivery(OBD) say of 50 quantity today and making OBD of 60 quantity tomorrow . system is allowing to make OBD of more quantity than STO has.
System is not allowing to make Goods receipts of second OBD of 60 quantity by throwing error of quantity exceeds,then user is going to STO again and increasing the quantity in STO equal to shortage.
My problem is how i can stop user so that he can not make OBD more than STO quantity? What setting i have to change in system so that system will give error at OBD creation stage itself.
Thanks in Advance.
parag.Dear friend
Delivery item categories settings 0VLP will not work in STO because STO is a purchase order not sales order
This is an input that i got from MM forum
Please go thro this as it will useful to you
STO - How to control Over delivery ? Please check OSS note 548914.
I have searched in MM forum and found this thread which is relevant to your requirement
Forum post in ERP - Logistics Materials Management (MM): STO - How to control Over delivery ?
STO - How to control Over delivery ?
From OSS note 548914 Over/underdelivry tolerances for GR/GI for stock transp.ord.
u2022 R E L E A S E < 4.70
Stock transport orders without SD processing / delivery (for example movement type 351 for the goods issue, Transaction MB1B, MB11):
During the creation of goods issues for stock transport orders the system does NOT include overdelivery tolerances (T156F-FELDM = DM07M-UETMG) maintained in the purchase order item. The system checks only against the quantity ordered during which the system may display message M7022, which can be customized. This is valid for both stock transfers within a company code and for cross-company-code stock transfers.
Stock transport orders with SD processing / delivery (for example movement type 641 for the goods issue, SD Transactions VL02, VL10):
If these are stock transport orders with SD processing, the system neither checksduring the goods receipt nor during the goods issue against the quantity ordered + overdelivery tolerance.
u2022 R E L E A S E >= 4.70
As of Release 470 there is, if required, a check against underdelivery tolerances (Field V_T161W-TOLKZ) during the goods issue for the stock transport order. Otherwise the checks are as described for the earlier releases. Customizing: IMG => Materials Management => Purchasing => Purchase Order => ..underdelivery tolerances
My Issue is solved.
Using the BADI LE_SHP_GOODSMOVMNT we were able to control this scenario.
Take the help of the abaper & proceed.
This is not possible thro customization only thro user exit it can be controlled
Dear friend
There is one way to control over delivery in STO
Go to t code OMCQ
Select message M7 - 024 and change from warning to error
Under delivery can be controlled by img-mm-purchasing-purchase order-set up STO----assign delivery type ,one step procedure and under delivery tolerances
Regards
Raja
Edited by: ramanathan raja on Mar 20, 2009 12:14 PM -
Replenishment with less than required quantity
All,
We are executing replenishment via RLLNACH1 (or LP21) from our high rack to our fixed bins in the background.
We then run RLAUTA10 to create the TO from the TR. We have selected allow partial prov in TO and Select partially processed TO's.
In some cases, we are seeing TO's created for less than the required quantity or NO TO's at all when there is enough stock in both cases.
Scenario 1:
Material Master Settings for fixed bin:
Min: 10
Max: 102
Replen Qty: 0
Stock situation:
High rack for bin1 = qty 26
High rack for bin2 = 120
Fixed bin Qty avail stock = 4 (below min)
TR created for Qty of 98 (102 minus 4 avail). TO created for only 26 (the first bin above in full). This leaves the TR partially processed, with remaining open qty of 72 (98 minus 26). The system did not create TO a second line item for the TO from the other available stock in bin2 for the balance up to the maximum. Any ideas why not? Does GR Date in high rack bin or quantity in the high rack bin?
Scenario 2:
Material Master Settings for fixed bin:
Min: 30
Max: 50
Replen Qty: 0
Stock situation:
High rack for bin1 = qty 150
High rack for bin2 = 300
High rack for bin3 = 275
Fixed bin Qty avail stock = 15 (below min)
TR created for Qty of 35 (50 minus 15 avail). TO is NOT being created. There is plenty of stock in high racks. Not sure why???
This is creating many ineffeciencies in our system. Please respond.
Regards,
Sandy MinerThank you very much for your reply. I believe my settings are correct for my strategies and storage type master data.
Storage Type Search strategy is going for both high rack and double pallet (001 & 002). My stock in question is located in the high racks (001). High racks are SU managed.
The materials in question are not batched managed, so that should not be an issue.
The fixed bin storage type has 'addition to stock' set and it is not SU managed. We do not allow mixed storage of any kind. I don't THINK this is a problem because the fixed bin is not SU managed and, as stated before, the material is not batched managed, so changing it to setting "A" several homogeneous storage units per bin should not impact this because it's not SU managed. Do you agree?
I am checking the back ground job log as well, to see if there's any messages in that log. I do like the idea of creating the TO manually and 'debugging' the search strategy, etc.
Any other input would be helpful. Especially about the mixed storage note above. Could this be an issue? Do you allow mixed storage in your fixed bins? Are you settings similar?
Thank you,
Regards,
Sandy -
Qty in Confirmation of Service is less than Delivery Quantity
Hi All,
I am trying to find the rootcause of a situation with our delivery document, hope you could help.
In our delivery, we have TAX "Non Stock Item" line items (no Movement Type); and for these kinds of items, I understand that:
1) They do not check stock, and you can do PGI without any stock
2) Upon GI, these generate "Confirmation of Service" entries in the document flow (whereas Standard Items, with Movement Types attached, generate a material document)
3) Unlike zero-delivery-quantity parent line items of batch splits, who also generate Confirmation of Service entries upon GI, our TAX items actually have a non-zero delivery quantity
4) The TAX items are not relevant for picking, so there is a delivery qty, but then there is 0 pick qty
The issue I am having is that for one of the TAX items, the Quantity in the Confirmation of service is less then the Delivery Quantity. That is, when I go into the document flow:
a) The delivery line item has 55 units
b) The Confirmation of Service has only 24 units
c) The Invoice has 55 units again for this item
What's weird is that, if TAX items do not check stocks at all, why did the qty in the confirmation of service become less than the original quantity that is specified in the delivery?
Another unusual behavior i am seeing (may or may not be related to the above) is that the delivery is already invoiced but the delivery's doc flow status is still "being processed" (and not "completed"). This may be because of the above issue, but I see the TotalGdsMvtStatus of the delivery as C "Complete" - which may be why the invoice was possible.
Hope you could help provide some insights. Thanks!
Regards,
StephenHi Arakish,
Thanks for the inputs:
you checked: delivery picked qty is showing zero (no one entereed 24 in error)?
-> yes picked qty is 0 and the change logs do not show otherwise
there is only the one confirmation not two for that tax item in the doc flow?
-> yes there is only one confirmation of service entry in the doc flow, with 24 units
there is no descrepency in units of measure? (meaning it's not EA in one place but UPK or something strange like that else where)
-> yes the UoMs are all in KEGs
Another observation is that for the delivery status overview, the goods movement status of each of the line items is also C/Green (including my TAX item). The total goods movement status (header) is also C/Green
Hope you could shed more light. Thanks!
Regards,
Stephen -
Confirmed quantity is less than open quantity in sales order
when i create a sales order the Cumm ATP quantity was less than the amount specified in the sales order, i checked my stock and i have enough stock yet my delivery quantity is less than my sales order quantity and if i maually try to increase the amount in the delivery to what i have in the sales order it gives a message only xxxxx available . what can i do?
Date MRP e Reqd Qty Confmd *** ATP
01.09.2011 Stock 457
15.08.2011 CusOrd Totals record 20 - 0 0
19.08.2011 CusOrd Totals record 3,780- 3,780 0
30.08.2011 CusOrd Totals record 975- 300 3,323-
31.08.2011 CusOrd Totals record 150- 150 3,773-
01.09.2011 SLocSt 0401 378 378-
01.09.2011 SLocSt 0402 79 79
I have put the text above for your use, so you can now help me out, i hope to hear from you soon. -
Delivery quantity less than PO quantity
Hi
I have created an inter-company Purchase Order (NB type PO) which has a delivery quantity of 100 (example). Now I am creating an Outbound Delivery through VL10B. The delivery (NLCC type delivery) but the issue I am facing is that the delivery quanity is less than the PO quantity 70 (example). Why did this happen?
I checked MD04 and I can see that there is sufficient available stock on the delivery date againt that particular delivery.
Please advise.
Thanks
SuroI am assuming that by "confirmed qty in PO Delivery schedule tab" you mean the "Delivered" column. I think this gets populated ONLY once the delivery is created which is for the reduced qty, The HELP on this field shows "The Quantity delivered field shows you the quantity delivered against this schedule line via an outbound delivery (or possibly several such deliveries). This enables you to check whether the supplying plant will deliver the desired quantity of the material as scheduled.". Thus I do not think this get populated on PO creation autmatically and as such I could not see and confirmed qty field on the delivery schedule tab.
By the way we also have a Inbound delivery as part of CONFIRMATION key where we have confirmed full qty on the inbound delivery.
Regarding MD04, yes I am looking at that closely as well since that gives oen deliveries and I am trying to figure out available stock on that delivery date and the open delivery quantity for all the deliveries.......
Any other inputs are welcome...
thanks -
GRN Qty should be less than Sub contracting Challan Qty
Hi Friends,
When we put Sub Contract Challn at the time of receving Sub Contract material MIGO, system should pick up challn Quty, or System should accept less qty than Challan Qty.
Can we do the same ?
Please help me.
Thanks in Advance
YogeshHI,
Yes GRN Qty should be same or less than Sub contracting Challan Qty, system will allow you do the reconcilation with J1ifq or if the challan qty less then GRN quantity at the time system wont allow you to do the reconcilation
Regards
Pramod
Maybe you are looking for
-
Are there any way to lock tables when i insert data with SQL*Loader? or oracle do it for me automatically?? how can i do this? Thanks a lot for your help
-
Windows XP does not recogized Sound Blaster Audilogy 2 Platinum c
I upgraded to windows XP professional. I used the creatli've installation CD to install software. Creative Media Source will install. Audigy part will not install. Computer states, "Sound Card not Recognized. Make sure sound card is installed properl
-
MIRO Split out line item based on different tax amounts
Hello Friends, We have a scenario where we get different tax rates related to the same line item quoted on the invoice which we receive from the vendor. The split out of the line item amount into different tax rates is not known at the time of bookin
-
Hi Experts, I m new into ALE/IDOC technology and wht to know in depth and Full fledge. plz suggest me some documents. Thanx in advance
-
"Mavericks cannot be installed on this computer," bs!
Please help. I am trying to install Mavericks on an iMac with a 6,1 identifier number and 10.6.8 installed and up-to-date. WHY does it say, "Mavericks cannot be installed on this computer," when I try to get it? I meet at least three specs to be able