Need to decommission a Windows 2003 server....

I have a Windows 2003 DC with all the FSMO roles.  It was the first DC of the domain
I also have 3 other DCs that are Windows 2008 R2.  
All of the DCs are global catalogs.  
DHCP Server is running on the Windows 2003 DC.  
All of the DCs run DNS Server but a majority of the PCs in the network point to the Windows 2003 DC for DNS resolution.
1) What do I need to do to get rid of the Windows 2003 DC cleanly and efficiently?  Is there a certain order of steps? 
2) How should I split the FSMO roles between the remaining 3 Windows 2008 R2 DCs?
3) I want to split the DHCP between the 3 DCs.  Should I copy the DHCP database from the Windows 2003 DC and import it?  Or should I recreate 3 non-overlapping scopes?

To migrate the FSMO roles have a look at this guide
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/324801 which explains all the steps. Once everything's been moved you can demote the server so it's no longer a DC, though personally I'd opt for shutting it down where possible initially, just so it's still there
if you find something hasn't been moved. Once you're happy everything is still working without it being there then make sure you demote it, otherwise you'll end up with old records hanging around. If you want to make absolutely sure you could have a look at
http://msmvps.com/blogs/acefekay/archive/2010/10/05/complete-step-by-step-to-remove-an-orphaned-domain-controller.aspx which details the steps required if a server isn't cleanly removed and you end up with orphaned records.
Not sure about the splitting of the FSMO roles to be honest. I suspect realistically your best off keeping them all on the one server, since it will make management a lot easier (eg you know which one server is more important than the others), and of course
if you split it then rather than having a 1 in 3 chance if one of the servers died of having to recover that info, you'd now be guaranteed problems regardless of which server died.
For DHCP there's a guide here for how
http://blogs.technet.com/b/networking/archive/2008/06/27/steps-to-move-a-dhcp-database-from-a-windows-server-2003-or-2008-to-another-windows-server-2008-machine.aspx for how to move DHCP to another server. In terms of multiple servers, unless you want to
go for a full on DHCP failover setup, splitting the scope is the best option, since you can't have multiple DHCP servers actively giving out the same IPs. I haven't tried it to be honest, but since the scope it only a part of the DHCP settings, I'd suggest
you should be able to use the above process, import those settings to each DHCP server, and then once imported edit the DHCP scope on each such that they no longer overlap. That way you ensure that all the other settings remain the same and are completely
identical.

Similar Messages

  • QT 7.1 fails on windows 2003 server. REVERTED NEEDED.

    Tried to update to Itunes 6.0.5, and I've been to ****, and reverted.
    Quicktime 7.1 does not install proberly on windows 2003 server.
    MORE IMPORTANTLY: it will not properly uninstall.
    When using the Itunes/quicktime combo, all you get is a lot of errors at restart (call MS and ask for the stack traces with Itunes in them
    If you install using the standalone, then you need get the following error:
    error number 0x80040707
    description: DLL function call crashed: QTInstallCode.QuickTimePortInstallProc
    This occurs after the dialog which lets you set the file and mime types appears.
    Windows 2003 server, dual processor (not dual core), 4 gigs ram, intel sata raid
      Other OS   Windows 2003 Server

    Not sure if you realize this is a user-to-user board.
    Contact the QT folks here
    http://www.apple.com/quicktime/feedback/

  • Windows 2003 Server Standard Edition,  Oracle process needs 5 Gb memory

    Hi
    Actually i'm under Windows 2003 server Standard Edition and Oracle Standard 9.2.0.6.
    I need to have for my oracle process (User Process) a large amount of memory. (>= 5 Gb) probably 3 Gb for the PGA and 2 Gb for the SGA. (roughly).
    I'm looking on AWE 4GT etc... Microsoft is'nt clear about this.
    People with a similar experiment? Is it necessary to migrate under Windows 2003 Server Enterprise Edittion ?
    All informations and experiences are welcome.
    Regards
    Den

    Before considering ways to overcome process addressing limits (32-bit process virtual address space), Windows Server Std Ed can use/see maximum 4 GB RAM. You cant fit 5GB Oracle Server memory + other stuff + OS in that. I guess your only options are EE 32-bit or Std Ed x64, if you have the hardware.
    But, staying on the 32-bit path, it will be hard to achieve confilicting objects of large memory areas. Remember that process virtual space is 4GB regardless of how much RAM the hardware (and OS) can manage.

  • How to Install 64-bit "Generic / Text Only" print driver on a 32-bit Windows 2003 Server?

    Hi All,
    In a nutshell, I need to Install the 64-bit Generic / Text Only print driver on a 32-bit Windows 2003 Server’s “Generic / Text Only 32-bit print queue.
    The problem is that there is no Driver-Disk to get the drivers. I’ve been able to isolate 14 files related to the 64 bit drivers from a Windows 7 x64 computer and copy them to a temp folder on the Windows 2003 x32 server. When I try to add the 64 bit driver
    to the Windows 2003 x32 server,  it wants a *.inf file, which I don’t have and can’t find.
    Because Microsoft will no longer support Windows XP, my client is replacing all of their Point-of-Sale Windows XP x32 systems with Windows 7 x64. They use Terminal Services (Remote Desktop) to connect to a Windows 2003 x32 server to use the POS system. The
    POS software redirects LPT1 back to the local Generic / Text Only printer. This works great for XP x32.
    When we use the Terminal Services POS software on the new Windows 7 x64 system, none of the labels print out because it’s redirected in 32-bit back to the local Windows 7 x64 Generic / Text Only 64-bit printer.
    This will be a huge issue for me if I can’t get this to work.
    Thanks in advance for any suggestions and help! -Rob

    those may be helpful...
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/a129f49a-0216-41f0-b190-3efb46fbb8ac/generic-text-only-driver-on-windows-2008-server-r2?forum=winserverprint
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/yongrhee/archive/2009/09/14/how-to-add-64-bit-print-drivers-on-32-bit-windows-server-2003-or-windows-server-2008-print-server.aspx
    Best,
    Howtodo

  • Installing problem on Windows 2003 Server 64 bit

    Dear All,
    I'am trying to install XE onto a Windows 2003 Server 64 bit.. The installation process ends without any errors but the database itself seems not to start.
    I tried several hints that have been mentioned here within the forum. But none of them worked. While experimenting I saw that there is not a single registry entry of Oracle within HKEY_LOCAL_MASCHINE\Software .
    Is there a possiblity to set those needed registry entries manually? Is there a script for that purpose?
    Thank you very much for your help!
    Regards
    Matthias

    Hi,
    thank you for your reply. As 32bit programs should run under Windows 64bit I thought the XE should run under 64bit, too.
    The installation of XE itself seems to finish without any errors. But within the log files it can be read that the database has not started up due to a out of memory problem. This causes many log entries within all other logfiles as no database could be created.
    The out of memory problem might be the same as within Advice on running XE on a small virtual Linux host ("Virtuozzo") because I am using a virtual windows 2003 server with "Virtuozzo", too.
    At this time I am on discussing the issue with the provider. Maybe I will get a dedicated server with Windows Server 2003 64bit. Hopefully the XE could be installed on the 64bit Windows Server because 32bit dedicated servers are rare.
    Best regards
    Matthias

  • Can't connect my Mac to my Windows 2003 server shares via SMB

    Hello all
    So my problem is I have my Powerbook running 10.4.7 with all the latest security updates and I cannot connect it to any shares on my Windows 2003 domain controller. Everything was working fine and I could connect to the server with no problem till about a month ago. However, I can still connect to the Windows 2000 domain controller with no problem. The error I get when trying to connect is "Could not connect to the server because the name or password is not correct". I did try clearing out my keychain, making sure all of the authentication policies on the server are correct (disabling the digitally sign commucations always policy), and I even went as far as editing a .conf file in /etc/ folder that allows for passwords to be sent without any encryption (I forget exactly what I changed but I can post that later when I get home from work) and none of this has worked. I unfortunately don't have another mac to test out connecting to the Windows 2003 server. Does anyone have any ideas of what I could do to try and get this issue resolved?

    TO share out as afp you need to have file and print services for macintosh installed on the 2k3 Server.
    O n the main management console click on the shares icon on the left. then click the "link" create a share. The wizard will guide you through the process. i forget the order of progression but i beleive its the second or third part in the dialog it will have 2 check boxes, the top one checked by default, is to share it for windows/smb the second (lower box) is to share as AFP for mac check this box and change the share name if you like. then proceed through the rest of the wizard. Make sure you configure the security/sharing prefs for access.. we typically remove the everyone policy and add one for Authenitcated Users, and ofcourse Administrators.

  • HP OFFICEJET PRO 8500A PLUS on Windows 2003 Server

    I'm trying to install the Windows 2003 driver for the HP OFFICEJET PRO 8500A PLUS but the installtion halts and says the operating system is not supported.  The O/S is fully patched. Does anyone have a go around for this?  I simply need it for Terminal Services users.

    Where did you get the driver pack from? Also are you running a 32 or 64 bit version of Windows 2003 Server? 
    This is the version of the driver pack you need: http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/softwareDownloadIndex?softwareitem=bi-105951-1&cc=us&dlc=en&lc=en...
    Let me know if this is what you already downloaded and also the questions from above.
    Thanks!
    Sean
    -------------How do I give Kudos? | How do I mark a post as Solved? --------------------------------------------------------

  • Oracle 10G slow Performance on Windows 2003 Server

    Hi there,
    Looking for a little assistance in locating a bottleneck that's started to hit our system this week. It's really odd because it's been starting around 10am every morning this week.
    today is the worst that I've seen it because it's almost brought the system to a halt.....
    We're running Oracle 10.2.0.1 64b on Windows 2003 Server 64
    The server has 16 processors and 64GB of RAM currently the CPU is sitting at 5% and the RAM usage is at 16.4GB
    It's a blade server with a SAN backend and I'm assuming the latency is coming from the disk but I need to determine this for a fact.
    I've only been a DBA for about a year and I'm stilling learing how to locate and identify issues. According to OEM I'm seeing
    a ton of I/O from the users. So anyways, any help or insight would be much appreciated and a learning experience for me.
    Thank you for your time and asistance.
    SB

    Thank you for the reply!
    We've had finding one FOREVER, I can't resolve it and I've read somewhere to ignore because OEM is false reporting. I'm adjusting DB_Cache now...
    Isn't possible that too much cache could be bad for the system and cause slow downs?
    FINDING 1: 100% impact (29725 seconds)
    Significant virtual memory paging was detected on the host operating system.
       RECOMMENDATION 1: Host Configuration, 100% benefit (29725 seconds)
          ACTION: Host operating system was experiencing significant paging but no
             particular root cause could be detected. Investigate processes that
             do not belong to this instance running on the host that are consuming
             significant amount of virtual memory. Also consider adding more
             physical memory to the host.
       RECOMMENDATION 2: DB Configuration, 100% benefit (29725 seconds)
          ACTION: Consider enabling Automatic Shared Memory Management by setting
             the parameter "sga_target" to control the amount of SGA consumed by
             this instance.
    FINDING 2: 51% impact (15210 seconds)
    The buffer cache was undersized causing significant additional read I/O.
       RECOMMENDATION 1: DB Configuration, 9% benefit (2685 seconds)
          ACTION: Increase the buffer cache size by setting the value of parameter
             "db_cache_size" to 7568 M.
       ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
          The value of parameter "db_cache_size" was "6912 M" during the analysis
          period.
       SYMPTOMS THAT LED TO THE FINDING:
          SYMPTOM: Wait class "User I/O" was consuming significant database time.
                   (84% impact [25073 seconds])

  • How do I rename an XE database on a Windows 2003 Server?

    Ok. I'm attempting to rename a freshly installed XE database on a Windows 2003 Server. It looks like there is no getting around the fact that the database gets named "XE" during installation. Because there could potentially be multiple installations of XE in my organization, I thought it'd be a good idea to disambiguate the installations by renaming them to match their function. In this particular case, I'd like to rename the database to "CTXMGMT". It will be a data repository for our Citrix farm administration programs.
    Here is what I've performed thus far:
    1. Installed Oracle 10g XE on one of our Windows 2003 Server, Standard Edition machines.
    2. Verified that the installation was performed correctly by making sure the 'Database Home Page' loads correctly through Internet Explorer, and by performing a few Select statements on the database (i.e. select name from v$database;)
    * * I then began following instructions from this document (http://www.utexas.edu/its/unix/reference/oracledocs/v92/B10501_01/server.920/a96652/ch14.htm#1004735) to rename the database. Note: I'm only trying to change the name of the database, not the ID.
    3. Shutdown the database
    4. Opened the database in MOUNT mode
    5. Ran the NID utility. Here's the actual input/output to/from the NID utility:
    C:\oraclexe\app\oracle\product\10.2.0\server\BIN>nid target=sys/manager@xe DBNAME=CTXMGMT SETNAME=YES
    DBNEWID: Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production on Mon Jul 10 15:55:10 2006
    Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
    Connected to database XE (DBID=2476560070)
    Connected to server version 10.2.0
    Control Files in database:
    C:\ORACLEXE\ORADATA\XE\CONTROL.DBF
    Change database name of database XE to CTXMGMT? (Y/[N]) => Y
    Proceeding with operation
    Changing database name from XE to CTXMGMT
    Control File C:\ORACLEXE\ORADATA\XE\CONTROL.DBF - modified
    Datafile C:\ORACLEXE\ORADATA\XE\SYSTEM.DBF - wrote new name
    Datafile C:\ORACLEXE\ORADATA\XE\UNDO.DBF - wrote new name
    Datafile C:\ORACLEXE\ORADATA\XE\SYSAUX.DBF - wrote new name
    Datafile C:\ORACLEXE\ORADATA\XE\USERS.DBF - wrote new name
    Datafile C:\ORACLEXE\ORADATA\XE\TEMP.DBF - wrote new name
    Control File C:\ORACLEXE\ORADATA\XE\CONTROL.DBF - wrote new name
    Instance shut down
    Database name changed to CTXMGMT.
    Modify parameter file and generate a new password file before restarting.
    Succesfully changed database name.
    DBNEWID - Completed succesfully.
    6. After running the NID utility from a separate DOS Window, I attempt to shutdown the newly renamed database from the first DOS Window I used in steps 3 & 4 from above (i.e. to shutdown the database and then start it in MOUNT mode) but I receive this error:
    ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel
    This is somewhat expected since the SQL*Plus connection in this window probably had "the bottom pulled out from under it" when the database was renamed.
    However at this point I'm unsure about what state the database is in. Is it down? Is it up? Logic would sort of dictate that the database was left in the MOUNT state, which is the state it was in when the database name was changed. However, the only way I'm able to get back in to the database is by doing the following
    a. Opened a new DOS window
    b. entered "set ORACLE_HOME=C:\oraclexe\app\oracle\product\10.2.0\server"
    c. entered "set ORACLE_SID=XE"
    d. entered " sqlplus "/ as sysdba" "
    e. at SQL> prompt, entered "startup"... which produces:
    SQL> startup;
    ORACLE instance started.
    Total System Global Area 285212672 bytes
    Fixed Size 1287016 bytes
    Variable Size 92277912 bytes
    Database Buffers 188743680 bytes
    Redo Buffers 2904064 bytes
    ORA-01103: database name 'CTXMGMT' in control file is not 'XE'
    SQL>
    From here I don't know what to do. According to the ORA-01103 error message, it looks like I need to change the database name in the control file to "CTXMGMT", but I'm not sure how I should go about that. The control file is a binary file, so I can't just open it up with Notepad and type in a new database name.
    I suspect that even once that is done that the listener.ora (and maybe the tnsnames.ora file?) will have to be edited to include the new "CTXMGMT" name, but I'm not sure how exactly those files should look to incorporate the new database name.
    Also, would the names of services have to be changed in Windows as well? (i.e. Would the Windows service named "OracleServiceXE" have to be renamed to "OracleServiceCTXMGMT" ?)
    In short, I really just need to know how to rename an XE database on Windows appropriately. The steps described above represent as far as I've gotten. If I'm going about it incorrectly could someone shed some light on the correct steps to follow? The more detailed the better. Thanks.
    - Gary

    Okay, I've....
    1) Reinstalled XE, to start from scratch
    2) Went in to SQL*Plus, did a "create pfile from spfile;"
    3) Shutdown the database
    4) Started it up in MOUNT mode
    5) Ran NID, to change the database name from 'XE' to 'CTXMGMT'
    6) Shutdown the database again
    7) Edited the pfile to change the database name (i.e. "db_name='CTXMGMT'")
    8) Started up the database
    And that worked! So that's good... but now my question is:
    How do I change the SID for the database? Currently, the instance name for the database is still 'XE'....
    SQL> select instance_name
    2 from v$instance;
    INSTANCE_NAME
    xe
    I'd like it so a connection could be made to the database with the tnsnames.ora file looking like this:
    CTXMGMT =
    (DESCRIPTION =
    (ADDRESS_LIST =
    (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(Host = rodin)(Port = 1521))
    (CONNECT_DATA = (SID = CTXMGMT))
    Could someone explain how to get the database to this state? Thanks.
    - Gary

  • Can't install ITunes on Windows 2003 server (WHS box)

    Hi,
    I can't install the latest ITunes because it incorrectly mistakes my Windows 2003 server as Windows XP. So after search I find that I can change the MSI files as according to this thread: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2154140.
    This seems to work for all MSI file sin the ITunes etup exe except for this: AppleMobileDeviceSupport.msi. If I change the MSI LaunchConditions it gives my error 2229 no matter what.
    So I'm stuck. Should I call Apple next?

    I can't help you with the error you get, but just to clarify while iTunes isn't "officially" supported for use on Server 2003, it does work. Sort of. iTunes 8 could be installed by editing the MSI, iTunes 9 however while this method is still required you'll run into a problem with iPodService.exe crashing, and iTunes refuses to finish the install until that service is up and running.
    There are a few topics on here that detail what you can do to get around this problem. I believe currently the only tried and tested method is to use the iPodService.exe from iTunes 8, doing a swap trick when the iTunes 9 service crash occurs so that you can at least get the application to install.
    I can't be bothered to go to the trouble though. I'm interested in seeing if Apple will silently stop with the BS and just fix the installer's version mismatch errors (easily done), and fix iPodService.exe. The reason why the service crashes, according to what I've read, is because it seemingly misidentifies Server 2003 and similar OS's as Vista or Windows 7, and then begins calling functions for those OSs from ntdll.dll - which causes the crash.
    As for your error, presumably that is with Orca. All I could find relating to the errors is something about transforming the MSI and language translations. It could also be because of an older version of Orca. Perhaps try and re-download iTunes, and extract the MSI packages again. But you should only need to edit the LaunchCondition for AppleMobileDevice.msi - and you don't need to delete the table either, you can simply change the number in NTVersion from 501 to 502, save the package and it'll all work. It did for me when I first tried it anyway.

  • Installing 9i on windows 2003 server

    i am trying to install oracle 9i on windows 2003 server, but i got an error message, like the following...
    "There are no patches that need to be applied from the patch set Oracle 9iR2 Patch set 9.2.0.3.0."
    i can't find a version(9.2.0.3) for windows 2003 server(32bit) on oracle download section. I think that windows 2003 server doesn't support the Oracle 8i(8.1.7), either.
    can someone help me install Oracle 8i or 9i on windows 2003 server?
    Thanks...

    I'm not sure there is a supported version for your O/S but if there is you will find it by going to the downloads page at http://otn.oracle.com.
    If there isn't I'd recommend going with a currently supported version of the product rather than one whose full support has ended.

  • Install R12 on windows 2003 server 64bit

    Hi Experts,
    I need to install Oracle Apps R12 on windows 2003 server 64Bit.
    what are all the steps should be followed to install Apps R12 on win 2003 server 64bit,
    Please help me to do this,
    Thanks
    Sundaravel.R

    Oracle E-Business Suite R12 Installation on Windows 2003
    http://onlineappsdba.com/index.php/2007/02/20/prepare-for-oracle-apps-r12-installation/
    HTH
    Aman....

  • Installin Oracle 10g rel 2 on windows 2003 server

    Hi
    I am trying to install oracle10g on windows 2003 server standard edition SP1. When i run the OUI i get the following error.
    OUI-10133:Invalid staging area. There are no top
    level components for Windows Nt or Windows 2000 area. And i am not able to install.
    Can somebody help in this.
    Thanks

    This is a problem with the media.
    I suggest copying all the files to a local hard disk and running the installer from there. I don't have good luck installing from CD with Oracle's databases - not sure why. I never have a problem (and it's WAY faster) installing from disk. You can erase the 800 MB of files after the install if you need the space.

  • Installation of SAP NetWeaver on Windows 2003 Server ( 32 Bit )

    Hello Gurus,
    I am planning installation of SAP Net Weaver - SR2 on Windows Server 2003 ( 32 Bit ) and oracle 10g is my database.
    can anybody guide me from where I can install the software coz in the market place SAP N/W-SR3 is available.
    Is SAP N/W - SR3 is recommeded for Windows 2003 Server ( 32 Bit ).
    Can any body guide me the process & my qurey.
    Thanks & Regards
    Shishir

    Read SAp note Note 1108852 - SAP NetWeaver 7.0 / Business Suite 2005 SR3: Windows
    it says:
    21/MAY/08
    SAP system installation only supported on 64-bit operating systems, except for  dialog instances
    As of SAP NetWeaver 7.0 SR3 and Business Suite 2005 SR3, SAP only supports to install dialog instances on 32-bit operating systems. All remaining SAP system instances (central instance, database instance, central services instance (SCS), ABAP central services instance (ASCS)) must be installed on 64-bit operating systems. Therefore the folder "SAP Systems" is not available on the "Welcome screen", when you start the installation from a installation master DVD for 32-bit.
    You might need to install dialog instances on 32-bit if you want to use 32-bit SAP NetWeaver components, such as Adobe document services. We recommend, however, to first check whether these 32-bit components can run on 64-bit operating systems. If so, we recommend to also use 64-bit systems for these components, including the dialog instance.
    If you want to install a non-productive SAP NetWeaver 7.0 SR3 based system (test systems or development are normally productive systems)  on 32-bit, proceed as follows:
          1. Install a SAP NetWeaver 7.0 SR2 (SAP ERP 2005 SR2, SAP CRM 5.0 SR2 SAP SCM 5.0 SR2, SAP SRM 5.0 SR2) system.
          2. Patch this system to SAP NetWeaver 7.0 SR3 (SAP ERP 6.0, SAP CRM 5.0 SR3, SAP SCM 5.0 SR3, SAP SRM 5.0 SR3).

  • Oracle HTTP Server download bandwidth limited on Windows 2003 Server

    Hi,
    we have an ApEx application with the following configuration on the server:
    OS: Windows 2003 Server 64Bit
    DB: 10.2.0.3 64bit
    HTTP Server: the one that comes on the companion CD of Oracle DB 10g 32 bit
    and after the bandwidth in the datacenter where the server resides was increased, I discovered a problem related to the server download bandwidth. I found on Metalink a Note [568075.1 - HTTP Server File Download Speed Is Slow |https://metalink2.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=568075.1] , but unfortunately not a very clear resolution given the fact that we use Oracle DB SEOne, so options 1 & 2 will involve additional licenses costs.
    I tried option 3 suggested in the note by using the HTTP Server that comes with 11g (I assume this is a supported configuration also from licenses point of view HTTP Server from 11g on top of Oracle DB 10g) and I got a boost in performance but the bandwidth is still 70% compared to the bandwidth I get when downloading from the IIS on the same server.
    Has anyone went through this exercise and found a solution for fully using the server bandwidth without needing to go for option 4 in the note, using Linux :), as in our case this will involve again additional licenses and/or hardware costs as the HTTP Server that comes with the DB has to be installed on the machine where the DB is installed?
    Thanks in advance,
    Florin

    Ooops ... things like this happen with Oracle Support, no answer?
    Can you tell me anyway the SR number or the SR title so that I can write it in the SR I make? Like that maybe Oracle Support will work harder on the case, as there are more customers hitting the same problem.
    Anyway in the meanwhile, I run some tests with the original Apache and this one works like a charm even in Windows 2003 Server. What remains now to be done is to use the Open Source Apache as proxy to the HTTP Server, as it looks like it handles much better the static content, it supports also mod_gzip or mod_deflate, but does not support mod_plsql :(. So I think the combination of the two: will do the work for me, but it is really a pity that I have to configure 2 web servers because the HTTP Server has flaws in it :(. Hopefully these will be fixed soon

Maybe you are looking for