Negative Committed

What would cause a negative committed in the "Item Master Data"?

Hi,
You can check the online help for the information on the Item Master Data fields and Tabs.
You can run the query stated in the Note 999124 "Changed Orders" and find out if it gives any result.
You can check the committed quantity for the item matches your Open Sales Order Quantity and Production Order quantity by doing a Drag and Relate to those Items.
If there is difference, you need to contact SAP Support to get the issue investigated and fixed.
Regards,
Jitin

Similar Messages

Negative Committed Quantity

Hello,
I'm getting negative committed quantities in some of my items.
Even an item with just one sales order for 697 is showing a committed quantity of -314.96. We are not using production orders.
All answers appreciatted, thanks.

Hello,
In order to check if the committed quantity of the Item is correct or not please check through the drag and relate option whether there are any Sales Order or Production Order open with some quantity in it.
Total the quantity of open Sales Orders and Production Order and that total should match the quantity in the committed column in the Item Master Data.
If the issue is still there then, asking for support from SAP would be beneficial.
Regrds,
Jitin Chawla

Negative committed adding to instock

Good morning
item showing 1783 "instock" and -240 "committed", which than shows an "available" of 2023,

Hi Jill,
Available = Instock - Committed.
In your case you have negative committed so the system adds it.
Please check note 999124 and run the query attached, '0_Wrong_IsCommitted_OnOrdered.TXT'.
If you get results, log a message with SAP Support.
Hope it helps,
Jesper

Negative committed quantity in stock??????be positive plz

hi
i've noticed a minus sign in quantity committed field in stock .This is really weird since i dont think that a committed quantity should be negative,any idea on how this could happen?
thanxs in advance
regards
s.brooks
Message was edited by:
Ombretta Roverato

Hi Ombretta
In B1, if you don't control continue of stock B1 can do transaction with sotk in negative.
You look "ADMINISTRATION\Company Details\Default Evaluation Mothod", I Think this option you have true.

Negetive Commited Quantity showing

Hi to All,
I am using SAP B1 2005 B PL 25.
I have noticed that there is one item in item master which is showing negetive value in committed. I have checked Inventory in Warehouse Report. when I moved to committed, it is showing negetive.
Can anybody has idea for this or can any body guide me to resolve this ?
Warm Regards,
Chintesh Soni

Hi Chintesh,
Incorrect negative committed quantities was a common problem with many of my clients when they were on the old 2005 version.
If the quantity is incorrect (sometimes it should be a negative quantity as explained by the posts above) then you can run a routine to recalculate the stock balance.
If I remember in 2005 it is in Administration / Utilities / Restore / Restore Item Balances.
Enter your offending stock item number in the from and to field and click OK.
This should then correct the negative quantity. Please ensure you backup your database first.
Regards,
Adrian

Negative ordered quantity

I don't know why I got negative ordered quantity and negative committed quantity in my Item Master
Could anyone know how to fix the problem ? Is it affect the operation and may I know any other cause will be affected?
Regards,
Alex

Dear Alex,
For this kind of issue please send a customer message to the Support Center, the consultant will help you out.
Usually this kind of issue will need DB fixing to correct the data.
For more information you could also refer to note:999124
Incorrect committed\On order quantity when changing orders
note:1137673 Incorrect ordered quantity after receipt from production
Best Regards
Helen Sun
SAP Business One Forums Team

Project Closed with a negative amount

Hi Experts,
I need your help, I have a project in which I have a negative amount showed in T.Code CN41 as Ttl Commitment, but I have checked in CJ74/CJ76 and nothing appears. I also run KOB2
Could you help me to fin that negative value.
Regards,
Marcos

Your issue explanation is not quite clear. I think technically system cannot record negative commitment it can be only zero at max.
however it is still possible to Project objects have negative cost get reported in acutal line item report. This normally happens when you are settling in excess of actual.
Information required from your side is
Are you referring commitment or Cost ?
The same is reported on which cost object i.e. WBS, Internal Order etc..
With Regards
Nitin P.

Wrong committed quantity

Hi
My customer has the following issue: An item shows committed quantity but there are not open sales order for that item. What can i check to see what is happenning?
Thanks
Adriana

Hi Adriana,
You may check these threads first:
Re: Explanation about note 999124 - Incorrect committed\On order quantity when
Negative Committed Quantity
Thanks,
Gordon

Questions again :D

Hi all,
i have some question, and i hope you can help me to solved it
1. i create UDF Marketing Document - Row - Text for PO. i want to make
this text can be multiline like in MSExcel using Alt+Enter. how i can make
this thing?
2. i found my committed column in item master was lost eventhough i just
created my sales order with status Open. why this can be happened?
i found also my committed column in item master being negatif. i checked
with a query using base reference, and the sales order status are closed.
how i check or found where's the negatif committed stock??
3. does anyone knows, what the different between "BaseRef" and
"BaseDocNum"? could you explained to me?
thanks, and i appreciate your respons soon.
cheers, sisca
Edited by: Fransisca Dwi on Jan 9, 2008 8:50 AM

Ans 1. If you want to type mutiple lines, I would suggest you try to add User field of type Text or Add a new row with row Type text.
Ans 3. BaseRef referes to DocEntry of Base document whereas BaseDocNum refers to DocNum of Base document

Regarding negative no s in committed quantity

Dear all,
                        While checking the stock status of a finished goods...............the value in the committed qty is coming as negative....and the value in the available qty is added up with the in stock value.
Example:-
                                     Instock             committed                 Available
1)Item A                       1020                  -180                         1200
Kindly suggest me a solution for that.
Regards,
shyam

Hi shyam,
Refer this link may it will help you
Negative Onhand Quantity
I think Log SAP Support for that.
Thanks,
Srujal Patel

Why the system is picking negative value in commitment budget?

While creating a GRN I am getting an error message u201CItem 001 WBS element MA.01.01 budget exceededu201D checking the same in budget report, I found that that the PO value of the element is negative in commitment budget amount details.
Why the system is picking negative value in commitment budget?
How can I fix the system from not allowing negative value?
Example: Total budget in WBS Element MA.01.01 is Rs.10,000.00.
The PO value for PO001 Rs.4,000.00, PO002 Rs.3,000.00 & Rs.2,000.00.
It means the available budget is Rs.1,000.00.
But when creating another PO value of Rs.2,000.00 the PO is getting save.
After that the system is considering any of the PO as negative. When I am trying to create GRN on that particular PO system is giving error message and asking to increase budget.

Hi ,
Check whether
1. In transaction OKKP for the controlling area commitement mgmt is active.
2. If this is only for a specific project the try to reconstruct project info database in transaction CJEN.
3. During the accounting entries system may hitting the recovery G/L accounts with the help of MM consultant check the accounting settings in transaction OBYC are correct or not.
Rgds

PS Budget Report S_ALR_87013558 shows negative available amount

Hi ,
We activated Availability control in our Project System. We created a project, WBS elements, network activities. Then setup the budget (WBS level) then release the budget. Purchase requisitions were made to PO items, some were receipted and some are still in Commitment. We also added the cost for Travel and Accomodation but haven't posted any actual cost for these network activities. Then when I generated S_ALR_87013558 the budget available amount shows a negative balance.
I already run CJEN to reconstruct the table, CJBN to recontruct the availability control balance but it still generating the same negative available balance.
We setup our tolerance limit to raise an error once the budget reached 100% but in this case it should already been triggered before reaching zero but it didn't happen.
Any solution for the problem is greatly appreciated.
From this going forward any cost that need to be added to the project triggers the error message BUDGET EXCEEDED! it supposed to been triggered before the negative available amount on the report was reached.
The report show that I have an amount presented on the following columns:
ACTUAL
COMMITMENT
REMORDPLAN
ASSIGNED
I already checked the individual network activities to checked if the balance showed in the RemOrdPlan is correct using the formula REMORDPLN = MAX(0, PLAN - (Actual+Commitment)) and it is consistent with the amount presented in the report.
thanks
sunil

Hi,
Some ideas :
1st. Try to check the history when the AVAC activated. It could be AVAC activated after PR/PO created.
2nd. Try run cj31. Compare the value there with the report S_alr_**** . If the value is not match , you should apply some notes. It could be your AVAC not working properly.
3rd. In order to prevent any futher issue for another project. Try to CJBW, CJEN and CJBN, for all projects (one time only). Put some budget on it. Next step do background schedule (CJEN after that CJBN) let say for weekly for all projects.
Hope can give you some ideas.
Cheers,
Nies

Commitement Error While Creating PR

There is one critical problem arises related to commitment budget during PR and PO. Please go through the below scenario:-
Suppose I have released budget of Rs. 5000 in one WBS and I create one PR of value 3000. Now my commitment is Rs. 3000 and available budget is Rs. 2000. Now suppose I delete this PR. Now my commitment should be zero but the system is showing commitment of Rs. -3000 and available budget is Rs. 5000. Now again I create a PR of Rs. 3000 in the same WBS. Now my commitment should be Rs. 3000 but system is showing commitment is zero and allow me to create PR for another Rs. 5000. But in real sense I consumed budget of Rs. 8000 but my release budget is Rs. 5000.

Gokul Pillai wrote:
Hi,
>
> I agree. Once you delete the PR the commitments should be shown as zero. Try repeating the scenario with a new project and this time when you delete the PR check the reports. If it still shows a figure with a negative sign run one of the correction programs for commitment. I think the program name is RKANBU01. Run this in SE38. You can also check program RKACOR04 & RKACOR10.
>
> Check the reports once again after running this program and repeat the steps you mentioned. Let us know what happens.
>
> Regards,
> Gokul
Hi,
I had checked the above Program,
when i had run RKANBU01 it was not corrected then i had run RKACOR04 and CJEN then it is corrected.
But this is specific to a project. i am facing the same issue for few other project also and it is very strange that this issue is not comming regurlarly.. it is comming rarely..some time when i am making the same changes issue won't come but sometime it is coming..
Can anyone suggest the permanent solution for this...

Wrong commitment reduction when clearing down payments

Hi, we are implementing PSM-FM in ERP version 6.0. We have BCS and
online payment update activated.
We are having problems regarding down payment clearings.The commitment
reduction is not working properly.
Detailed explanation:
1. We created a purchase order for a single material. FM Account
assignments to a single funds center for $500.000.(doc number 11000006).
FM integration ok!: a record for value type 51 (purchase orders), value
$500.000 is created.
2. We then create a down paymen request (trx F-47) for $100.000 with
reference to the previous purchase order.
No FM repercussion which is ok!
3. We then pay (via F110) the down payment request. We got a down
payment document for $100.000 (doc 90000008).
FM integration ok!: a record for value type 61 (down payments), value
$100.000 is created. A reduction (amount type 0200) for $100.000 also
is recorded in value type 51 (purchase orders).
4. We then make a partial goods receipt (MIGO) for $ 500.000.
No FM repercussions / postings which is ok.
5. Next, we make a partial invoice receipt (MIRO), for $110.000, total
$134.200, including VAT for $24.200 (doc 300000030).
FM integration ok!: a record for value type 54 (invoices), value
$110.000 is created. A reduction (amount type 0200) for $110.000 also
is recorded in value type 51 (purchase orders).
6. Next we partially clear the down payment against the invoice. We
need only to clear $20.000 from the original $100.000. We use trx F-54
for this. (doc 300000031)
FM integration ok!: a record for value type 61 (down payment), negative
value $20.000 is created. A record (amount type 0200) for $20.000 also
is recorded in value type 51 (purchase orders).
7. We then pay the invoice (via F110), taking into account the credit
for the previous $20.000. (doc 900000016)
FM integration issues:
7a) For value type 54 (invoices) a reduction (amount type 0200) for
value $93.606,56 is recorded.
7b) A "paid" (amount type 0250) for $93.606,56 also is recorded in
value type 57 (payments).
We do not desire nor understand why the system behaves like this. We
are
familiar with previous versions and the desired behavior in a 5.0
system would have been:
The total amount of the paid invoice ($ 110.000) be recorded as
a "paid" (amount type 0250) in value type 57 (payments).
If not, we would never see the total amount of the invoice as "paid".
Please, can you help me?
Regards,

Hi Diego,
I suggest you to review note 400924 since all existing critical business cases (already defined for RFFMS200) remain valid also for payment online update. I also suggest you to check the documentation using the F1 help in transaction OF29.
Make sure notes 1150182, 1166048 and 1224438 are applied in your system.
You can find information about the down payment functionality in consulting note 1279351 and also in its related notes 1001216, 532725. Also make sure your customizing is in accordance with the payment update online manual.
I hope the information above helps you.
Regards, Mateus

FM error message "Annaul release 2008 is negative"

Dear Sir&Madam,
Please advise on January 4, 2009 I did carry forward by using T-code FMD1>FMJ1>FMJ2-->FMJA
>FMJBFMJC. There is fund center 1303 commitment item 318 it has line item as follow
Budget line item year 2008:(T-code S_ALR_87012628 - Periodical Display)
Budget carryforward (receiver)      0.63
Budget carryforward (sender)     -48.30
Budget releases                    -47.67
Actual line item year 2008: (T-code S_ALR_87012632 - All Postings)
Funds blocking                      6.51
Invoices                                   -54.18
Budget line item year 2009:
Budget carryforward (receiver)     48.30
Report year 2008 (T-code S_ALR_87012623 - Overview )
Current budget is -47.67
Distribute is -47.67
Assigned is -47.67
Avaliabel is 0
Commitment is -47.67
I would like to release budget in 2009 by FR10 or change original budget by FR04 system display error "Annual release 2008 is negative 1303/M318 -47.67"
Please advise how can I slove it.
Thank you in advance and Regards,
Polla

Dear AP,
Budget Report year 2008 (T-code S_ALR_87012623 - Overview )
Current budget is -47.67
Distribute is -47.67
Assigned is -47.67
Avaliabel is 0
Commitment is -47.67
Regards,
Polla

Negative Committed

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for