Negative Posting (net amount is in negative)

Hi,
Can I Post to fico '-' ve amount. My case is Earning is zero but some amount has deducted.
It means Net amount is in negative.
Example.
Earning = 0.
Dedeuction = 100.
Net amount = -100.
Is it possible or not.
Actual payroll is running but error in posting to account.
Or
How can I deduct a amount by Off Cycle???? Possible or not
plz suggest me.
Thanks & Regards
Neelesh Sonkar
Edited by: Neelesh Sonkar on Sep 24, 2010 10:37 AM

Hi,
Wage Type /561 will be forming as Claims for negative amounts instead of /560.
Assign G/L account to /561 via symbolic account with proper posting characteristics for the Symbolic account.
Only thing to be noted is, after posting the particular amount through this wage type, the amount will be there in the G/L as uncleared amount.
In future, whenever/560 is generated for that employee the entry will be getting balanced / nullified.
Thanks and Regards
kiran

Similar Messages

Applied amount cannnot be negative in Goods receipt PO

Has anyone encountered a problem when adding Goods receipt PO based on purchase order with a negative amount line, the error message:Applied amount cannot be negative in the base document.

Dear Mr Phan,
Can you please clarify which version and patch you are using, and if the GRPO is based only on the negative line or on the all document.
When I tried to enter a Purchase Order with a negative line only (and negative total payment due) the system doesn't add the document, but if I add another positive line above the amount of the previous one I can add the document and add a GRPO based on it.
Please, let me know the steps you are taking.
Regards,
Marcella Rivi
SAP Business One Forums Team

Calculation and posting of discount on Payment and on net amount

Hello,
My client would like to configure posting of discount on payment. The discount should be calculated on the net amount and should also adjust the VAT input tax amount. Example:
PO: 100 EUR, VAT 10 EUR, Gross amt = 110 EUR, Invoice recieved: 110 (-110 on vendor,100 is posted on GR/IR and 10 on input tax). When payment is done, discount amounts to 2.2 EUR ( 110 is posted on vendor account, -107.8 on bank account, -2 on discount account, -0.2 in input tax).
Have anyone of you ever did this on SAP. Can you pleas explain me the steps if yes? Thank you for your help.

Hi,
I have already did a test with base discount on net amount and base vat on net amount check. When those are check, during good receipt the purchase account is debit with the net amount (gross -discount) and during invoice the difference is then transferred to the purchase account. The tax is calculated on the net amount. This is not what we are looking for. For us we want to know if it is possible that during good receipt and invoice received everything is calculated without taking into consideration the discount received. It is only when we are doing the payment of the invoice that discount is calculated and the VAT amount is adjusted for with the discount received. Thank you for your help.

To prefix an amount with a negative sign

Hi All,
I want to prefix a positive amount with a negative sign...for display...
How will I be able to do that ?
Regards,
Archana

amount = -1 * amount.
if it does not work then you might need to change the type of amount field.
Thanks,
Ram

Negative Posting - Billing Document

Hello,
May I kow the use of 'Negative Posting' field in billing document. In which way this would be useful.
Thanks in advance.

Check this thread
[Re: Negative Posting|Negative Posting;
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Error shows net price will be negative in pricing proceedure

Hi experts,
While creating purchase order in IS - Retail, Error shows that "net price will be negative".
could any body will be giving suggestions, why it has happened like this.
thanks and regards
suneel

HI Suneel
Please check following
1. In the condition type under control data tab check the plus/minus sign
2. Check your discount conditions more than gross price
3. Check vendor master data under purchasing tab pricing date control - don't maintain anything.
Best Regards
Swami

What's the purpose of negative posting ?

What's the purpose of negative posting ?

Hi
Pls check help provided by SAP
Negative stocks are necessary, for example, when goods issues are entered for organizational reasons prior to the corresponding goods receipts and the material is already physically located in the warehouse.
Once the goods receipts have been posted, the book inventory balance must again correspond to the physical stock, that is, the book inventory balance may no longer be negative.
Negative stocks are always a sign that physical movements must be be entered in the system at a later stage.
Example
1000 pieces of a material are delivered. Due to lack of time, the goods receipt is not yet entered in the system.
Physical stock: +1000 pieces
Book inventory balance: 0 pieces
The material is needed urgently and 100 pieces are withdrawn from the warehouse. The goods issue is entered in the system straightaway.
Physical stock: +900 pieces
Book inventory balance: -100 pieces
At the end of the day, a goods receipt is posted for 1000 pieces.
Physical stock: +900 pieces
Book inventory balance: +900 pieces
Reward if usefull
vishal..

Negative posting from SD

Hello experts
Is there any way to make negative posting when Good issue cancellation (VL09)?
Paresh Jivani

Hello
Thanks for reply.
These both setting I have already done and we are posting with negative posting through FI module. My question is how we can make negative posting through SD module.
Scenario is like this,
1. Shipping
          FI journal:
                               Dr. Cost of good sold (100)
                               Cr. Stock (100)
2. Cancellation Of Shipping (VL09)
             FI journal
                            Current :
                                         Dr. Stock (100)
                                         Cr. Cost of good sold (100)
                             WE NEED
                                         Dr. Cost Of good sold (-100)
                                         Cr. Stock (-100)
                                *Here minus sign means negative posting
Thanks
Paresh

I was concerned after reading all of the negative posts about the Micro .

I just received my Micro (Light Blue, thank you) this afternoon. I had replied to some of the posts the other night expressing my concern over potential troubles with the unit. I read horror stories about firmware and software problems, players and systems locking up, poor quality USB drivers and/or cables and countless hours spent searching through forums and sending units back for replacement.
I'm happy to report that I thus far have had absolutely NO trouble with my Micro. Software instillation was smooth and my first transfer (about .5 gigs) only took about 30 minutes or so and was flawless!! Audio quality is superb and it sounds even better through my new Inspire T3000 speaker system.
I should apologize to those who may have been discouraged by my previously pessimistic attitude in earlier posts. I also want to thank the few of you who did respond positi'vely to my questions and helped put aside my fears. You guys were right !! I love this thing ............

hsalter3, by reading the title of your post, I thought that your posting is going to be negati've. It turns out to be the opposite. Since you are going to post positi've comments, you should choose a more appropriate title for your post. Otherwise, it may mislead a lot of people who just browse through the titles only.
Similarly, your post almost misled people regarding the transfer speed. Luckily, someone questioned further and you made a clarification.
Anyway, it nice knowing that you like the Zen Micro.

F-32 Partial payment amount greater than net amount

Hi Experts,
We have recently a problem in clearing up payments in F-32. When we double-click the item under Partial Payment Tab, the warning message displays "Partial payment amount greater than net amount" then the value in the Payment Amount Column becomes negative. The users need to activate 2 separate entries for partial payment but instead of . How can we do this?
We have to post like this in partial payment under same customer:
20090820     1400005790     DZ     19     20.08.2009     20.08.2009     5,000.00-     1,295.12
20110225     1400010330     DZ     19     25.02.2011     25.02.2011     2,000.00-     1,295.12-
So the the Assigned Value should be zero to post.

Thanks @Atif. Ok so now I understand that the "Total Difference Posting" amount inf-32 will create the new amount of the residual payment with Document Type AB.
Now with the Warning Message "Partial Payment Amount greater than the net amount", this is in a overpayment amount that is reflected in transaction F-32, here are the entries:
Assignment Doc Num      Doc Type      Post Key    Net Amt         Partially Paid Amt Payment Amt
2133004220     90005448     RV     01     3,707.02      3,305.71      401.31
2133015007     90020098     RV     01     7,836.68      6,737.25      1,099.43
2133016757     90022362     RV     01     10,521.31      8,603.87      1,917.44
2133137046     90187172     RV     01     11,367.68      0.00      11,367.68
2133137047     90187173     RV     01     1,354.09      0.00      1,354.09
2133137048     90187174     RV     01     1,739.82      0.00      1,739.82
2133137049     90187175     RV     01     994.57      0.00      994.57
20110419     90187176     RV     01     6.42      0.00      6.42
20110421     90187177     RV     01     44.94      0.00      44.94
20110425     90187178     RV     01     19.26      0.00      19.26
20081216     1400003657     DZ     19     3,421.86-     3,394.04-     27.82-
20081222     1400003706     DZ     19     1,000.00-     1,033.17-     33.17-
20090310     1400004396     DZ     19     420.51-     401.25-     19.26-
20090630     1400005319     DZ     19     786.13-     705.94-     80.19-
20090702     1400005349     DZ     19     596.04-     535.88-     60.16-
20090820     1400005790     DZ     19     5,000.00-     6,295.12-     1,295.12-
20090824     1400005827     DZ     19     308.16-     295.32-     12.84-
20091027     1400006377     DZ     19     400.72-     375.04-     25.68-
20091215     1400006796     DZ     19     349.89-     337.05-     12.84-
20100608     1400008253     DZ     19     200.09-     189.39-     10.70-
20101019     1400009279     DZ     19     165.85-     155.00-     10.85-
20101019     1400009280     DZ     19     254.65-     238.00-     16.65-
20101019     1400009281     DZ     19     160.64-     157.00-     3.64-
20101130     1400009595     DZ     19     10,000.00-     5,440.92-     4,559.08-
How is this possible that Document numbers 1400003706 and 1400005790 has overpaid amount. And both of them are downpayment documents? Is there any way I can clear them with the Invoices, I am also lost with this kind of scenario?

Sales order net amount coming in minus.

Dear All,
I am facing strange problem while creating sales order net Amount is coming in minus
I had check all parameter I had done manually and automatically for pr00 ( maintain conduction record ) but still in both case amount is coming in minus.
Please advice.
Ahmed

Hi,
Check out which condition type are determined by the pricing procedure.
How many of them are active to calculate the pricing.
Or your PR00 is only coming in negative?
Just check out in V/06 and select your PR00 and go to detail.
Check the plus/minus setting over there for PR00.
It should be either blank or positive.
Just check out this setting.
Regards
Raj.

Clearing: how to get open items with net amount?

Hi
I need to obtain the open items for clearing <b>with the net amount</b> as it shows up in the transaction FB05 after considering any discounts that may apply. The BAPI BAPI_AR_ACC_GETOPENITEMS does not calculate the net amount.
I see that the data is calculated in SAPMF05B and saved in the internal table POSTAB which has the structure RFOPS. Basically i need to obtain the data of this internal table.
I was thinking of exporting the table in some user exit, but didn't find any suitable exit yet.
Any ideas anyone...?
Thanks for any hint.
Andreas

Hi All,
Thanks for the reply..
==============================================================
Basically create one ckf and two rkfs for each aging bucket
ie ckf 0-30 days = rkf 0-30 days open + rkf 0-30 days subsequently cleared
Because you need to restate the AP report to a key date - some items have changed their status since that key date but were open at the key date (ie we call those subsequently cleared)
so rkf 0-30 days open is
posting date <= key date
item status = O
net due date between variable date (cmod which reads key date) offset 0 and variable date (cmod which reads key date) offset -30
rkf 0-30 days subsequently cleared is
posting date <= key date
cleared date > variable date (which reads cmod of key date)
net due date between variable date (cmod which reads key date) offset 0 and variable date (cmod which reads key date) offset -30
========================================================================
In the above two cases, while creating restricted key figures how to design this;
net due date between variable date (cmod which reads key date) offset 0 and variable date (cmod which reads key date) offset -30
And also after creation of two rkfs i created a ckf i.e ckf = rkf1+rkf2.
Now i dragged this ckf into columns and when i checked the query it is giving error that key date variable is used more than once. ( Bcz we have used key date variable both in rkf1 and rkf2 for getting posting date <= to key date )
What is the solution for this ?
Regards,
Rao.

Report RFKOPR10 has to dispaly Net amounts, excluding VAT

Hi, Currently the Report RFKOPR10 is displaying the aging for 5 periods:
                                                                                -Aging 0-30 days
                                                                                -Aging 30-60 days
                                                                                -Aging 60-90 days
                                                                                -Aging 90-120 days
                                                                                -Aging 120-150 days.
and Gross Amount (including VAT).
Now I have to diplay   Net amounts, excluding VAT.
Could you please suggest me the logic where I have to change the program and How can I modify this program.
Thanks and Regards
NTR

> Total Posts: 83
> Total Questions: 59 (44 unresolved)
You will get more and better answers if you follow up on your old posts. It would also help if you assign po1nts to helpful answer rather than just marking them as solved and adding a comment that doesn't add anything.
Rob

Net Pay calculation is wrong, allowance wage type is not getting added to net amount..

Hi Dears,
We are doing payroll configurations for one of our client in india, Regarding our requirement ,we jus tried in test system, we have written a pcr rule stating 01st feb 2015, new allowance need to paid to employees belonging to L&T1 pa and LT ESG.. Allowance will be percent based on gross pay..allowance percentage differs according to the ESG..
Before writing the PCR, Allowance percentage has been maintained in T511K.. And have configured as payroll constant ZTST 1 should be calculated with a value 2%.
i have created a new wage type 9021 allowance wage type and this wage type amount should be automatically generated in payslip based on the pcr i have written while running payroll for an employee.
EARNINGS                                                       DEDUCTIONS
l&t basic pay 9000             54838.71                    INCOME TAX
l&t conveyance 9100            2741.94                   12394.00
l&t hra           9200               4387.10
l&t allownace 9021                1239.36
TOTAL Gross amount          63,207.11              Take Home pay (net pay) 49,573.75
But the actual net amount should be 50,813.11..Based on the allowance wagetype i have created which is automatically generting using the pcr i have written , is getting calculated in the gross amount..
but not getting added in net amount .so please help me out guys on how to solve this issue???
Regards,
Surya Prabha

Hi Remi,
Thanks for your kind reply, yes these values are taken from the remuration statement of a particular pernr whom am running the payroll..
i have checked the processing classs and i have maintained 5 and 70 which add this new allowance amount to my net amount. now the net amount is proper.
EARNINGS                                                       DEDUCTIONS                   perks/other income/exemptions
l&t basic pay 9000             54838.71                NCOME TAX                       l&t leave encashment    1239.36
l&t conveyance 9100         2741.94                   12416.00
l&t hra           9200               4387.10
TOTAL Gross amount          61,967.75             Take Home pay (net pay) 50 791.11
Regards,
Surya Prabha

Payment amount greater than net amount!

Payment amount greater than net amount! , i am receiving this error while doing partial payment.. plz help
Also reversed documents are not coming in partial payment tab in F-53 but it is showing as a open item in vendor balance.....

/hi,
First of all Check ur Clearig GL i.e Bank /Cash in that Relevant to cash Flow is ticked or not.If not ticked then tick it and then try again.
thanks
deepa

Negative Posting (net amount is in negative)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for