Negative quantity not allowed for Put Away Planned

Dear Experts,
I'm trying to activate the PDI document but the system show the error message: Negative quantity not allowed for Put Away Planned.
I was looking the document flow from the item 10 and I saw there is one task was created with quantity "1 box" and the same document was cancelled but the quantity "2 box" was cancelled. I believe because of this is happening the error.
All items from my HU is with the same problem, duplicate the quantity during canceling.
Somebody can give me advice how fix it.
I found a SAPNote but Note 1674037:Negative Put Away Planned quantity (PWP) due to "Store HUs" but I need a workaround to fix my actual PDI and finish the process.
Regards,
Alan Mattos

Hi Petr,
I checked the transaction SMQ2 and I dont have anything stuck there. Then I tried to change de deliveryquantity but the field quantity isn't available to change. My PDI document already been the Goods Receipt Status "Completed". I try to reverse this document and the system show the message: Delivery is locked (Posting Not Possible). I believe its happening because the PDI isn't active.
Do you have other idea ???
Thank you a lot for your help.

Similar Messages

Table mtl_material_transactions_temp with Negative balances not allowed

Hi,
I have uploaded few wrong cycle count adjustments that got duplicated and now
they are stuck in
table mtl_material_transactions_temp with error
Negative balances not allowed
Is there a way to fix them as they are showing in Un-processed material when
I try to close the period.
I need to close they period.
Re-submitting them also dont works and it get the same error.
Is there a way to get rid of these record?
thanks for help.
7Z

hi,
If this message you are getting Negative balances not allowed, you need to increase the onhand quantity in the subinventory and reprocess or better you can delete the record and try it again with the corrections.
Regards,
Syed

IS-R: Scenario to Create Delivery Order for Put Away? (MD)

For Put Away in merchandise distribution, how come a delivery order can be generated?
Since Put Away is to place the goods to shelf, there should not be a delivery order generated as follow-on document. However, in SPRO, we can configure at what point the delivery order is to be generated for Put Away e.g. After Adjustment (and then delivery order can be generated in WF30).
I would appreciate a scenario where a delivery order should be created for Put Away.
Any advise would be appreciated.
VT

Hi,
Merchandise Distribution Plan can be done by two method:-
Pull, Push
Pull is nothing but collective PO
Push method consist of putaway, cross docking, flow through..
Scenario for Put away
Head Office decide to procure Article 50 for store 1, 60 for store 2, 40 for store 3 by putaway method useing allocation WA01.
so whenever stores require merchandise, DC sends goods to stores from their stock...
In this scenario, store has to procure merchandise from DC as allocated by Head Office.
Regards
Vijai Jain

BAPI CASESERVICE CREATEMULT - Alternative price not allowed for the service

Hi,
I am using .Net Connector to connect to BAPI. I am developing a .Net order processing application and intend to send the order information to SAP using BAPI_CASESERVICE_CREATEMULT.
However, I keep getting the error message "An alternative price is not allowed for the service..". The service id is already setup at SAP and I am not sending any price information. I am only sending quantity. The DIFF_PRICE is set to 0.
Any advice? I appreciate your help.

Hi,
I am using .Net Connector to connect to BAPI. I am developing a .Net order processing application and intend to send the order information to SAP using BAPI_CASESERVICE_CREATEMULT.
However, I keep getting the error message "An alternative price is not allowed for the service..". The service id is already setup at SAP and I am not sending any price information. I am only sending quantity. The DIFF_PRICE is set to 0.
Any advice? I appreciate your help.

The value is not allowed for the field Cross-plant CM

Hello All
When i copy material in refernce to existin gone. I am getting this message
"The value is not allowed for the field Cross-plant CM"
I am not putting any thing in this Basic-view Cross-plant CM, but still getting this message.
Any help will be good...Thanks in advance...

Hi,
Please check the check box in front of the field config material is checked?
If so then this material is configurable material
A material that can have different variants.
For example, a car can have different paint, trim, and engines.
Configurable materials have a super bill of material (BOM) that contains all the components for producing every variant of the material. Similarly, they have a super task list that contains all the operations. When a material is configured, only the components and operations needed for a variant are selected.
Please check
BR
Diwakar

SMQ2 Error: Delivery has not yet been put away / picked (completely) in ECC

Hi All,
I am processing an Outbound Scenario..everything is fine until SMQ2 shows an error in ECC system. SMQ2 shows me the following error:
Delivery has not yet been put away / picked (completely)
Message no. VL609
My outbound delivery which was distributed to EWM system has overall picking status as blank (Not relevant for picking).
Our system is recently upgraded to EhP6, since then we are seeing this issue. Interestingly VL01NO (Delivery without reference to Order) works properly.
Other ECC-EWM integration settings are fine. Delivery Type and Item Category also look good.
I could not be able to find any OSS Note relevant to this situation.
Could you anyone help me.
Thanks
Mahesh.

Further what I see in this Outbound Scenario in EWM is when I am creating Outbound Delivery meant for EWM system with ref. to Sales Order, "Picking" tab shows EWM WHN but also shows Overall WM status as "Transfer Order Required" which is not correct.
If I remove Storage Location and re-enter then Over all WM status and Over all Picking status fields come as blank. But after all EWM processing, SMQ2 queue (FM: BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CONFIRM_DEC) fails with error
Delivery has not yet been put away / picked (completely)
Message no. VL609.
Any thoughts?
Thanks
Mahesh

Que-''actual activity allocation is not allowed for order .''

hi ,
During confirmation of operation at co11n (also at co11), got one error massage i.e "actual activity allocation is not allowed for order "
Due to this error confirmation is not possible .
pls help me to solve this problem.
AMOL WAGH
Edited by: amol wagh on Dec 6, 2008 8:09 PM
Edited by: amol wagh on Dec 6, 2008 8:10 PM

Dear,
For allocation activity costs, we need to define activity type in KL01 by specifying the unit of measurement of the particular activity type (like machine - Hours etc.). While creating activity type, we will assign a secondary cost element (with category 43) in the activity type through which the activity cost will flow.
After that we will plan for cost center in KP06 (cost elementwise). Then we will plan machine hours in KP26 where we will link the activity type to a particular cost center.
Please give the feed back.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Actual activity allocation is not allowed for order .

hi ,
During confirmation of operation at co11n (also at co11), got one error massage i.e "actual activity allocation is not allowed for order "
Due to this error confirmation is not possible .
pls help me to solve this problem.
AMOL WAGH

Dear,
What is message number? Did you assign the usersttus in BS02?
For allocation activity costs, we need to define activity type in KL01 by specifying the unit of measurement of the particular activity type (like machine - Hours etc.). While creating activity type, we will assign a secondary cost element (with category 43) in the activity type through which the activity cost will flow.
After that we will plan for cost center in KP06 (cost elementwise). Then we will plan machine hours in KP26 where we will link the activity type to a particular cost center.
When we do price calculation in KSPI, system checks the planned costs for cost center (in KP06) and also checks the machine hours planned (in KP26) and gives the cost for the particular activity type.
Please check the above in the system
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Delivery has not yet been put away / picked (completely)

Hello SDNers,
I have a Batch program that is calling VL02n for Delievry Picking ,Pcking & PGI....
This batch program runs in Background
For Some Delivery it is giving this Error Message "Delivery has not yet been put away / picked (completely)"
...But When i run the same program in foreground delivery got Processed Well.
CAN U PLS HELP ME
>Why this Happening
>In what scenarion we genearally get this message(we dnt have TO Confirm Step in our Process)
>even i Analyze the Program of VL02n ...This message is not there
From Where this message is comming
Thx in advance
PLS RPLY ASAP

After reading again through your messages, I understand that you are doing both PICK and PGI in single update BDC call to VL02N.
This is NOT correct way to do this, as this does not ensure that PICK values are committed first and then only PGI is attempted. We did face similar problems and have solved it by separating PICK and PGI in to two calls separated by COMMIT WORK AND WAIT.
I would suggest you to split your BDC into two calls. One which does only PICK and save and then followed by COMMIT WORK AND WAIT and then followed by another which does PGI and save. This should avoid the problem altogether.
Why it is not happening in foreground mode is it does not happen so quickly as in background. Even a split second can make a difference, that is why I would want you to split up both PICK and PGI update in two separate CALL TRANSACTION VL02N
I am not sure if it would help to know where the "Delivery has not yet been put away / picked (completely)" message is raised, as it is raised withing SAPs PGI routines, and it is mandatory that ONLY picked values are used for PGI.
I can only say that the message is given under id VL and no 609, it should be embedded somewhere in the PGI call, why don't you try to PGI without picking and put a watchpoint SY-MSGNO = 609

Error : T161W: Vendor+subcontracting vendor not allowed for 2-step stock tr

Hi Gurus,
When we creating a STO to sub contractor vendor ( in the delivery address tab we are entering the vendor # and activating the SC vendor check box)we are getting the error message as "T161W: Vendor+subcontracting vendor not allowed for 2-step stock transfer".
Message no: MEPO140
Note:
The STO is creating with out error in ECC 5.0 for the above scenario but when i'm trying the same in ECC 6.0 in another system I'm getting this error, Can any one please advice.
Thanks in advance,
Sai

Hi Charlie
I had same issue and we sloved it. but i have one more issue here.
We have created Po and SC Vendor is not check marked. When we go into the change mode of Po i can't see the field at all. but its availalbe in disply mode.
I am using ECC 6.0, Please suggest why this is happening. I need to put check mark for SC vendor.
thanks,
Raju

Fixed quantity not supported for alternative items

Hi dears,
I was trying to configure in a Bill of Material a group of components marked together as "Alternative item", having the Fixed quantity indicator set (so the quantity is not in proportioned with the order quantity).
However, when I do this action I have the error message no. 29485 "Fixed quantity not supported for alternative items", because a fixed quantity is not allowed for alternative items.
Leaving out the fact that I don't understand for which kind of logic this should be done, do you know if there is any solution to achive the same result (use alternative item and each of them should be with fixed quantity despite th eorder quantity)?
Thanks and regards,
Giovanni

Daily structure relationship step: remove relation
CLOSING

FI posting not allowed for WBS Element

Hi All,
While doing down payment billing I'm getting error that FI posting is not allowed for WBS element. But FI periods are open for all months in 2008.
Please suggest how to resolve this issue.
Regards,
Harish

Hello
Account assignment
If you want to post actual costs and commitments to a WBS element, you have to indicate that the WBS element is an account assignment element in the WBS. All objects that can be assigned costs and commitments within a project (for example, orders, networks, or purchase orders) can only be assigned to a WBS element if you have set the account assignment indicator for the element.
In Customizing for the Project System, you can set an indicator to specify that costs are planned for all WBS elements or only for specific WBS elements.
Billing
If you want to post revenues to a WBS element, you have to indicate that the WBS element is a billing element in the WBS.
Reg
assign points if useful

Error - Negative values not allowed

Hi,
I was running a BDC program with the user for F-28 Post incomming payments. After processing the BDC session it is giving the error saying Negative values not allowed. Can some one please help me find out what is this error and how to fix it.
Thanks,
Neelu.

Hi Neelu,
just take 2 records in the flat file and run it in the foreground with functional guy.
This issue is belongs to Configuration , so better to sit with functional and show them where the error is raised .
if not the configuration problem just check in the flat file the values available is with -ve r not .
No Doudt this is mostly functional configuration.
Thanks
Naveen khan
Message was edited by:
Pattan Naveen

Payment method(s) are not allowed for this program / Program RFFOAVIS_FPAYM

Dear Friends,
In Se38 abap editor, I entered the program RFFOM100, i entered the details program run date,identification future,paying company code,payment methods T, House bank, Account Id and executed the program. I am getting the error 'Payment method(s) are not allowed for this program'.
Payment method S is not used in F110, It was not mentioned in vendor master or vendor invoice.It is not mentioned in fbzp in bank determination. When i tried to delete payment method 'S' the system shows a message Payment Method S is being used in the company code.
In the program RFFOAVIS_FPAYM, i entered the details program run date,identification future,paying company code,payment methods T, House bank, Account Id and executed the program. I am getting the error 'Program RFFOAVIS_FPAYM: No records selected'. But there open items or invoices.
Please suggest how to resolve the errors.
Regards
Sridhar

Hello,
Why are you directly executing these programs?
You will not expect these program to execute directly by going to SE38.
I would have configured the relevant payment methods in the country with DME structure or classical RFFO* programs, which in turn pick up the inherent programs at the time of running F110.
For example, if you need to generate BACS file for country GB, either you copy the GB_BACS to ZGB_BACS or use GB_BACS directly in FBZP settings.
Make sure that you have maintained OBPM1 / OBPM2 / OBPM3 and OBPM4 settings properly.
The system automatically gives the access to system RFFOAVIS_FPAYM. Prepare a variant against this program in F110. Relevant file gets generated to folder path mentioned in OBPM4 will get generated. The file get generated can be seen in AL11.
Hope this is informative and solves your issue.
Regards,
Ravi

The value 4010 39 99 is not allowed for the field MARC-STEUC/BAPI_MARC-CTR

Hi all,
BAPI' BAPI_MATERIAL_SAVEDATA' throws error the below error while creating material.
'The value 4010 39 99 is not allowed for the field MARC-STEUC/BAPI_MARC-CTRL_CODE'
Any idea abt this error.
Regards,
Thiyagu

Hi,
As this BAPI is triggered from external sytem that by client in production environment , I would not be able to dig it further.
Thats why I asked if anybody confronted the same error previously.
Thanks for suggestion.

Negative quantity not allowed for Put Away Planned

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for