Nested Left Outer Join : Data Set

Hi All
I am bit confused about data set used by Nested Left outer join.
Can anyone help me.
Here is sample data:
Tables (Name, 3 Column each, total rows and matched rows if any):
     Table 1          
     A     B     C
     Total 20 Rows          
     Table 2          
     A     D     E
     Total 50 Rows and 10 Matching on      2.A = 1.A     
     Table 3          
     D     M     N
     Total 15 Rows and 15 Matching on 3.D = 2.D     
     Table 4          
     M     X     Y
     Total 20 Rows and 10 Matching on 4.M = 3.M     
Sql
select *
From Table 1
Left Outer Join on Table 2 on
               2.A = 1.A
-- Data set 1 will contain 20 Rows (10 matching and 10 non matching)
Left Outer Join on Table 3 on
               3.D = 2.D
-- What will be data set? 20 Rows of Data set 1 or 15 Matching Rows?
Left Outer Join on Table 4 on
               4.M = 3.M
-- What will be data set? X Rows of Data set 2 or 10 Matching Rows?
Please have a look and clear my understanding.

SeshuGiri wrote:
I have two tables defined (below). Emp table has data and there is no data in Emp_Type table yet! Right now it is empty.
I want to write a query that returns data from both the tables even though there is no data in Emp_type table. I am using left outer join but it returning nothing. Anyone can help?
select *
from emp e
left outer join emp_Type t
on e.empid = t.empid
WHERE t.type_id = 1
and t.end_date is null;
The join is including all rows from emp, just like you want.
The WHERE clause is discarding all of those rows. Since all the columns from emp_type (alias t) are NULL, the condition "t.type_id = 1" in the WHERE clause is never true.
Perhaps you meant to include all those conditions in the join conditions, like this:
select *
  from emp e
  left outer join emp_Type t
    on e.empid = t.empid
   and t.type_id = 1
   and t.end_date is null;Edited by: Frank Kulash on Jan 30, 2012 3:56 PM

Similar Messages

  • Display all dates between date range (Time Dimension left outer join Fact)

    All,
    I have done some searching around this issue but within all the posts regarding date variables, date prompts and date filtering I haven't seen one exactly answering my issue (maybe they are and I just dont have my head around it correctly yet).
    My report requirement is to allow a user to select a start day and an end day. The report should show all activity between those two days - AND display 0/null on days where there is no activity. That second part is where I am getting hung up.
    The tables in question are:
    TimeDim
    EventFact
    CustomerDim
    My BMM is setup as follows:
    TimeDim left outer join EventFact
    CustomerDim inner join EventFact
    If I run a report selecting DAY from TimeDim and a measure1 from EventFact with day range 1/1/2010 - 12/31/2010 .. I get a record for every day and it looks perfect because of the left outer join between TimeDim and CustomerDim.
    But .. if I add in a field from CustomerDim, select TimeDim.DAY, CustomerDim.CUSTNAME, EventFact.MEASURE1, OBIEE only returns records for the days that have EventFact records.
    This is due to the fact that the TimeDim is still outer joined into EventFact but adding in CustomerDim makes OBIEE setup an inner join between those tables which then causes only data to be returned where EventFact data exists.
    There is a way around this in this simple case and that is to define the relationship between CustomerDim and EventFact as an outer join as well. This will give the desired effect (but an outer join between these two tables is not the true relationship) and as I add additional dimensions and add additional logical sources to a single dimension in the BMM it gets complicated and messy.
    Ive also messed with setting the driving table in the relationship, etc.. but it has not given the desired effect.
    Has anyone ever encountered the need to force display all dates within a specfied range with a fact table that may not have an entry for every date?
    Thanks in advance.
    K
    Edited by: user_K on Apr 27, 2010 11:32 AM

    It worked!!!* Even my time drill downs and date based filtering still work!
    That is awesome. Never would have thought of that intuitively.
    Now, just need a little help understanding how it works. When I run my report and check the logs I can see that two queries are issued:
    Query 1: Joins the fact table to all the associated dimensions. I even changed all the relationships to inner joins (which is what they truly are). And calculates the original measure. If I copy and paste this query into sql developer it runs fine but only returns those rows that joined to the time dimension - which is what was happening before. It is correct but I wanted a record for every time dimension record.
    Query 2: Looks like the following:
    select sum(0)
    from timedim
    where date between <dateprompt1> and <dateprompt2>
    group by month *<--* this is the time dimension level specified in Query 1, so it knows to aggregate to the month level as was done in query 1
    Final Question: So what is OBIEE doing ultimately, does it issue these two requests and then perform a full outer join or something to bring them together? I couldn't see anywhere in the log a complete query that I could just run to see a similar result that I was getting in Answers.
    Thanks for all the help .. Id give more points if I could.
    K

  • Left outer join using date range returns too many rows

    I am trying to pull data for a website.
    Names table:
    company_name varchar2(30)
    julian_day varchar2(3)
    logins number(3)
    login_errors number(3)
    Given a julian date range (e.g. 250-252), I am displaying the information from the Names table.
    The problem is that I also need to display changes (increases/decreases) in the data. I do that by coloring the text based on a 10% increase/decrease. Data for the 3 days 250-252 would be compared to data for the previous 3 days 247-249.
    Not all companies will report data on all days, so some gaps in the data may exist. Therefore, I cannot do just a simple join.
    I am trying to write a query that will give me this information if the user chooses days 250-252.
    Company_name
    sum(logins) for days 250-252
    sum(login_errors) for days 250-252
    sum(logins) for days 247-249
    sum(login_errors) for days 247-249
    The query I'm using is:
    select cur.company_name, sum(cur.logins),
    sum(cur.login_errors), sum(old.logins), sum(old.login_errors)
    FROM names cur LEFT OUTER JOIN names old
    ON cur.company_name = old.company_name
    WHERE cur.adate>='250' and cur.adate<='252'
    and old.adate>='247' and old.adate<='249'
    GROUP by cur.company_name
    Given this data:
    Company_name adate logins login_errors
    ABC 247 10 10
    ABC 248 20 20
    ABC 249 30 30
    ABC 250 15 15
    ABC 251 25 25
    ABC 252 35 35
    My problem is that it returns:
    adate cur.logins cur.login_err old.logins old.login_err
    250 15 15 60 60
    251 25 25 60 60
    252 35 35 60 60
    How can I get it to only give me the one "old" day's data? I went with the LEFT OUTER JOIN because it's possible that there is no data for an "old" day.
    Thanks in advance.....

    Your problem stems from the join itself, and would be the same even without the OUTER JOIN. With your data, there are 3 records in cur and 3 records in old. The join matches each record in cur to each record in old resulting in 9 records in total. Without the SUM, this is clear:
    SQL> SELECT cur.company_name, cur.logins, cur.login_errors,
      2         old.logins, old.login_errors, cur.adate cad, old.adate oad
      3  FROM names cur LEFT OUTER JOIN names old
      4                 ON cur.company_name = old.company_name
      5  WHERE cur.adate>=250 and cur.adate<=252 and
      6        old.adate>=247 and old.adate<=249;
    COMPANY_NA     LOGINS LOGIN_ERRORS     LOGINS LOGIN_ERRORS        CAD        OAD
    ABC                35           35         10           10        252        247
    ABC                25           25         10           10        251        247
    ABC                15           15         10           10        250        247
    ABC                35           35         20           20        252        248
    ABC                25           25         20           20        251        248
    ABC                15           15         20           20        250        248
    ABC                35           35         30           30        252        249
    ABC                25           25         30           30        251        249
    ABC                15           15         30           30        250        249
    9 rows selected.You can do this with only one reference to the table.
    SELECT company_name,
           SUM(CASE WHEN adate BETWEEN 250 and 252 THEN logins ELSE 0 END) curlog,
           SUM(CASE WHEN adate BETWEEN 250 and 252 THEN login_errors ELSE 0 END) curerr,
           SUM(CASE WHEN adate BETWEEN 247 and 249 THEN logins ELSE 0 END) oldlog,
           SUM(CASE WHEN adate BETWEEN 247 and 249 THEN login_errors ELSE 0 END) olderr
    FROM names
    WHERE adate BETWEEN 247 and 252
    GROUP BY company_nameHTH
    John

  • Need to specify LEFT OUTER JOIN while using data from logical database BRM?

    I'm trying to extract data for external processing using SQVI. The fields required are in tables BKPF (Document Header) and BSEG (document detail) so I'm using logical database BRM. Note: required fields include the SPGR* (blocking reasons) which don't appear to be in BSIS/BSAS/BSID/BSAD/BSIK/BSAK, hence I can't just use a Table Join on any of these but have to use BSEG, hence BRM.
    If the document type is an invoice, I also need to include the PO number from table EKKO (PO header), if present, hence I'd like to add this to the list. However, if I do this, it seems that some records are no longer display, e.g. AB documents.
    The interesting thing is that not all records are suppressed, so it's not a simple case of the logical database using an effective INNER JOIN, but the effect is similar.
    In any event, is there a way to specify that the link to table EKKO should be treated as an effective LEFT OUTER JOIN, i.e. records from BKPF/BSEG should be included irrespective of whether any records from EKKO/EKPO exist or not?
    Alternatively, is there some other way to get the SPGR* fields (for example) from BSEG and still join the BKPF? Of course, one solution is to use multiple queries, but I was hoping to avoid this.

    Thanks for everyone's responses, I know how to work around the problem with sql, I am wanting to see if there is a way to make the outer joins filter go in the join clause instead of the where clause with Crystal Reports standard functionality. 
    We have some Crystal Reports users that are not sql users, i.e. benefit specialists, payroll specialists and compensation analysts who have Crystal Reports.  I was hoping this functionality was available for them.  I just made my example a simple one, but often reports have multiple outer joins with maybe 2 or three of the outer joins needing a filter on them that won't make them into an inner join. 
    Such as
    Select person information
    outer join address record
    outer join email record
    outer join tax record (filter for active state record & filter for code = STATE )
    outer join pay rates record
    outer join phone#s  (filter for home phone#)
    I thought maybe the functionality may be available, that I just don't know how or where to use it.  Maybe it is just not available.
    If it is not available, I will probably need to setup some standard views for them to query, rather than expecting them to pull the tables together themselves.

  • Error in making left outer join to a nested query

    i am writing this query getting error here i am using nested query with that i am making join it is giving error
    SQL
    SELECT
    * FROM IVItem INNER JOIN
    IVPackSize_Mst ON IVItem.PackSizeID = IVPackSize_Mst.Id
    left outer join IvItemGenericLink on IvItemGenericLink.itemID=IVItem.Id
    Select GenericId from
    IvItemGenericLink where ItemID=IVItem.Id and rownum <=1
    )x
    and x on IvItemGenericLink.GenericId=x.GenericId;
    Error report:
    SQL Error: ORA-00936: missing expression
    00936. 00000 - "missing expression"
    *Cause:   
    *Action:
    give me and suggestion

    i am using left outer join at virtual table say x your gave me its equivalent
    EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM IvItemGenericLink G
    WHERE G.ITEMID =V.ID
    AND G.GenericId = L.GenericId)-----its i guess inner join
    i am not confirmed that why iam asking this i guess i have to use this
    as i use keyword inner join for inner join and for left join i use
    left outer join
    EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM IvItemGenericLink G
    WHERE G.ITEMID =V.ID
    AND G.GenericId(+) = L.GenericId)-----its i guess left outer join
    left outer join
    Select GenericId from
    IvItemGenericLink where ItemID=IVItem.Id and rownum <=1
    )*x*
    IvItemGenericLink.GenericId=x.GenericId
    -------------------Statement U Gave in this--------------------------------------------------------------------------
    SELECT *
    FROM IVITEM V, IVPACKSIZE_MST M , IVITEMGENERICLINK L,
    WHERE V.PACKSIZEID = M.ID
    AND V.ID = L.ITEMID (+)
    AND EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM IvItemGenericLink G
    WHERE G.ITEMID =V.ID
    AND G.GenericId = L.GenericId)
    -------------------Statement U Gave in this--------------------------------------------------------------------------
    is this equivalent to left outer join
    *AND EXISTS (
    SELECT 1 FROM IvItemGenericLink G*
    WHERE G.ITEMID =V.ID
    *AND G.GenericId = L.GenericId
    please tell me this in this regard

  • How to Mark join as left outer join in Info set

    Hi Folks,
    I have 2 info cubes in Info set, I need to mark the join as Left outer join.
    I have read some blogs where is says that it cant be joined, but one of my colleagues has made left outer join using two cubes.
    I want to replicate the same thing into my design.
    If i normally connect one IO to another cubes same IO- its a normal join- its not written as left outer join. I want to see left outer join written on my link.
    I tried global setting but no use.
    Am I missing some setting,

    Hi Vivek,
    Please have a look at SAP Note 577953 - @0S@ InfoSets (BW): Left outer joins.
    The answer on question "3. How do I define a left outer join in InfoSet maintenance?" describes how you should proceed.
    Best regards,
    Sander

  • Not using Index when SDO_RELATE in Spatial Query is used in LEFT OUTER JOIN

    I want to know for every City (Point geometry) in which Municipality (Polygon geometry) it is.
    Some cities will not be covered by any municipality (as there is no data for it), so its municipality name should be blank in the result
    We have 4942 cities (point geometries)
    and 500 municipalities (polygon geometry)
    SELECT T1.NAME as City, T2.NAME as Municipality
    FROM CITY T1
    LEFT OUTER JOIN MUNICIPALITY T2 ON SDO_RELATE(T1.GEOM, T2.GEOM, 'MASK=ANYINTERACT') = 'TRUE'The explain plan for this query is:
    SELECT STATEMENT
      FILTER
        Filter Predicates
          MDSYS.SDO_RTREE_RELATE(T1.GEOM, T2.GEOM, 'mask=ANYINTERACT querytype=window ') = 'TRUE'
        MERGE JOIN
          TABLE ACCESS              CITY               FULL                            11
          BUFFER                                       SORT                        100605
              TABLE ACCESS          MUNICIPALITY       FULL                            20So the cost is in the BUFFER (whatever that is), it takes +2000 seconds to run this, it is not using the spatial index.
    And we are not getting all rows, but only the ones interacting with a municipality, e.g. 2436 rows.
    But I want all rows, including the ones not interacting with any Municipality.
    When we want only those cities that actually are in a municipality, I use a different query and it will use the index.
    SELECT T1.NAME as City, T2.NAME as Municipality
    FROM CITY T1, MUNICIPALITY T2
    WHERE SDO_RELATE(T1.GEOM, T2.GEOM, 'MASK=ANYINTERACT') = 'TRUE'I get (only) 2436 rows (as expected) in 5 seconds (it is fast) and the explain plan shows it is using the spatial index.
    But in this case, I am not getting any cities not inside any municipality (of course)
    SELECT STATEMENT
       NESTED LOOPS
          TABLE ACCESS                   MUNICIPALITY       FULL                22
          TABLE ACCESS                   CITY               BY INDEX ROWID      22
             DOMAIN INDEX                CITY_SDX                                0
                Access Predicates
                   MDSYS.SDO_RTREE_RELATE(T1.GEOM, T2.GEOM, 'mask=ANYINTERACT querytype=window ') = 'TRUE'I always thought a LEFT OUTER JOIN would return all rows from the Table, whatever happens in the next,
    but it seems the query has been rewritten so that it is now using a Filter Predicate in the end, which filters those geometries having no interaction.
    As an example I also do thing alphanumerically, I do get 4942 rows, including the ones which have no Municipality name.
    In this case the names must match, so its only for testing if the LEFT OUTER JOIN returns stuff correctly, which it does in this case.
    SELECT T1.NAME as City, T2.NAME as Municipality
    FROM CITY T1
    LEFT OUTER JOIN MUNICIPALITY T2 ON T1.NAME = T2.NAMEIs this an Oracle Spatial bug, e.g. not return 4942 rows, but only 2436 rows on the first query?
    Note all tests performed on Oracle 11g R2 (11.2.0.1.0)

    Patrick,
    Even so, your geoms in the relate were the wrong way around.
    Also, I don't recall you saying (or showing) that you wanted the municipality geometry returned. Still,
    no matter, easy to do.
    Here are some additional suggestions. I don't have your data so I have had to use some of my own.
    set serveroutput on timing on autotrace on
    SELECT T1.SPECIES as City,
           (SELECT T2.ADMIN_NAME FROM AUSTRALIAN_STATES T2 WHERE SDO_ANYINTERACT(T2.GEOM, SDO_GEOM.SDO_BUFFER(T1.GEOM,10000,0.5,'UNIT=M')) = 'TRUE') as Municipality,
           (SELECT T2.GEOM       FROM AUSTRALIAN_STATES T2 WHERE SDO_ANYINTERACT(T2.GEOM, SDO_GEOM.SDO_BUFFER(T1.GEOM,10000,0.5,'UNIT=M')) = 'TRUE') as geom
      FROM GUTDATA T1;
    762 rows selected
    Elapsed: 00:00:21.656
    Plan hash value: 2160035213
    | Id  | Operation                   | Name                       | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT            |                            |   762 | 49530 |     5   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |   1 |  TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| AUSTRALIAN_STATES          |     1 |   115 |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  2 |   DOMAIN INDEX              | AUSTRALIAN_STATES_GEOM_SPX |       |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |   3 |  TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| AUSTRALIAN_STATES          |     1 |   115 |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  4 |   DOMAIN INDEX              | AUSTRALIAN_STATES_GEOM_SPX |       |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |   5 |  TABLE ACCESS FULL          | GUTDATA                    |   762 | 49530 |     5   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       2 - access("MDSYS"."SDO_ANYINTERACT"("T2"."GEOM","SDO_GEOM"."SDO_BUFFER"(:B1,10000,0.5,'UNIT=M'))='TRUE')
       4 - access("MDSYS"."SDO_ANYINTERACT"("T2"."GEOM","SDO_GEOM"."SDO_BUFFER"(:B1,10000,0.5,'UNIT=M'))='TRUE')
       Statistics
                   7  user calls
               24576  physical read total bytes
                   0  physical write total bytes
                   0  spare statistic 3
                   0  commit cleanout failures: cannot pin
                   0  TBS Extension: bytes extended
                   0  total number of times SMON posted
                   0  SMON posted for undo segment recovery
                   0  SMON posted for dropping temp segment
                   0  segment prealloc tasksThe above can look messy as you add more (SELECT ...) attributes, but is is fast (though can't use in Materialized Views).
    /* The set of all cities not in municipalities */
    SELECT T1.SPECIES                 as City,
           cast(null as varchar2(42)) as municipality,
           cast(null as sdo_geometry) as geom
      FROM GUTDATA T1
    WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1
                         FROM AUSTRALIAN_STATES T2
                        WHERE SDO_ANYINTERACT(T2.GEOM, SDO_GEOM.SDO_BUFFER(T1.GEOM,10000,0.5,'UNIT=M')) = 'TRUE')
    UNION ALL
    /* The set of all cities in municipalities */
    SELECT T1.SPECIES    as City,
           T2.ADMIN_NAME as Municipality,
           T2.GEOM       as geom
      FROM GUTDATA T1
           INNER JOIN
           AUSTRALIAN_STATES T2 ON (SDO_ANYINTERACT(T2.GEOM, SDO_GEOM.SDO_BUFFER(T1.GEOM,10000,0.5,'UNIT=M')) = 'TRUE');
    762 rows selected
    Elapsed: 00:00:59.953
    Plan hash value: 2854682795
    | Id  | Operation           | Name                       | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT    |                            |    99 | 13450 |    38  (87)| 00:00:01 |
    |   1 |  UNION-ALL          |                            |       |       |            |          |
    |*  2 |   FILTER            |                            |       |       |            |          |
    |   3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL| GUTDATA                    |   762 | 49530 |     5   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  4 |    DOMAIN INDEX     | AUSTRALIAN_STATES_GEOM_SPX |       |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |   5 |   NESTED LOOPS      |                            |    61 | 10980 |    33   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |   6 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL| AUSTRALIAN_STATES          |     8 |   920 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  7 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL| GUTDATA                    |     8 |   520 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       2 - filter( NOT EXISTS (SELECT 0 FROM "AUSTRALIAN_STATES" "T2" WHERE "MDSYS"."SDO_ANYINTERACT"("T2"."GEOM","SDO_GEOM"."SDO_BUFFER"(:B1,10000,0.5,'UNIT=M'))='TRUE'))
       4 - access("MDSYS"."SDO_ANYINTERACT"("T2"."GEOM","SDO_GEOM"."SDO_BUFFER"(:B1,10000,0.5,'UNIT=M'))='TRUE')
       7 - filter("MDSYS"."SDO_ANYINTERACT"("T2"."GEOM","SDO_GEOM"."SDO_BUFFER"("T1"."GEOM",10000,0.5,'UNIT=M'))='TRUE')
       Statistics
                   7  user calls
              131072  physical read total bytes
                   0  physical write total bytes
                   0  spare statistic 3
                   0  commit cleanout failures: cannot pin
                   0  TBS Extension: bytes extended
                   0  total number of times SMON posted
                   0  SMON posted for undo segment recovery
                   0  SMON posted for dropping temp segment
                   0  segment prealloc tasksMuch slower but Materialized View friendly.
    This one is a bit more "natural" but still slower than the first.
    set serveroutput on timing on autotrace on
    /* The set of all cities in municipalities */
    WITH municipal_cities As (
      SELECT T1.ID         as City,
             T2.ADMIN_NAME as Municipality,
             T2.GEOM       as geom
        FROM GUTDATA T1
             INNER JOIN
             AUSTRALIAN_STATES T2 ON (SDO_ANYINTERACT(T2.GEOM, SDO_GEOM.SDO_BUFFER(T1.GEOM,10000,0.5,'UNIT=M')) = 'TRUE')
    SELECT T1.ID           as City,
           T2.Municipality as Municipality,
           T2.GEOM         as geom
      FROM GUTDATA          T1
           LEFT OUTER JOIN
           municipal_cities T2
           ON (T2.CITY = T1.ID);
    762 rows selected
    Elapsed: 00:00:50.228
    Plan hash value: 745978991
    | Id  | Operation             | Name              | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT      |                   |   762 | 44196 |    36   (3)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  1 |  HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER|                   |   762 | 44196 |    36   (3)| 00:00:01 |
    |   2 |   VIEW                |                   |    61 |  3294 |    33   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |   3 |    NESTED LOOPS       |                   |    61 | 10980 |    33   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |   4 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL | AUSTRALIAN_STATES |     8 |   920 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  5 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL | GUTDATA           |     8 |   520 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |   6 |   INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| GUTDATA_ID_PK     |   762 |  3048 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       1 - access("T2"."CITY"(+)="T1"."ID")
       5 - filter("MDSYS"."SDO_ANYINTERACT"("T2"."GEOM","SDO_GEOM"."SDO_BUFFER"("T1"."GEOM",10000,0.5,'UNIT=M'))='TRUE')
       Statistics
                   7  user calls
               49152  physical read total bytes
                   0  physical write total bytes
                   0  spare statistic 3
                   0  commit cleanout failures: cannot pin
                   0  TBS Extension: bytes extended
                   0  total number of times SMON posted
                   0  SMON posted for undo segment recovery
                   0  SMON posted for dropping temp segment
                   0  segment prealloc tasksFinally, the Pièce de résistance: trick the LEFT OUTER JOIN operator...
    set serveroutput on timing on autotrace on
    SELECT T1.SPECIES    as City,
           T2.ADMIN_NAME as Municipality,
           T2.GEOM       as geom
      FROM GUTDATA           T1
           LEFT OUTER JOIN
           AUSTRALIAN_STATES T2
           ON (t2.admin_name = to_char(t1.ID) OR
               SDO_ANYINTERACT(T2.GEOM, SDO_GEOM.SDO_BUFFER(T1.GEOM,10000,0.5,'UNIT=M')) = 'TRUE');
    762 rows selected
    Elapsed: 00:00:50.273
    Plan hash value: 158854308
    | Id  | Operation           | Name              | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT    |                   |   762 | 92964 |  2294   (1)| 00:00:28 |
    |   1 |  NESTED LOOPS OUTER |                   |   762 | 92964 |  2294   (1)| 00:00:28 |
    |   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL | GUTDATA           |   762 | 49530 |     5   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |   3 |   VIEW              |                   |     1 |    57 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  4 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL| AUSTRALIAN_STATES |     1 |   115 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       4 - filter("T2"."ADMIN_NAME"=TO_CHAR("T1"."ID") OR
                  "MDSYS"."SDO_ANYINTERACT"("T2"."GEOM","SDO_GEOM"."SDO_BUFFER"("T1"."GEOM",10000,0.5,'UNIT=M'))='TRUE')
       Statistics
                   7  user calls
                   0  physical read total bytes
                   0  physical write total bytes
                   0  spare statistic 3
                   0  commit cleanout failures: cannot pin
                   0  TBS Extension: bytes extended
                   0  total number of times SMON posted
                   0  SMON posted for undo segment recovery
                   0  SMON posted for dropping temp segment
                   0  segment prealloc tasksTry these combinations to see what works for you.
    Interestingly, for me, the following returns absolutely nothing.
    SELECT T1.SPECIES    as City,
           T2.ADMIN_NAME as Municipality
      FROM GUTDATA           T1
           LEFT OUTER JOIN
           AUSTRALIAN_STATES T2
           ON (SDO_ANYINTERACT(T2.GEOM, SDO_GEOM.SDO_BUFFER(T1.GEOM,10000,0.5,'UNIT=M')) = 'TRUE')
    MINUS
    SELECT T1.SPECIES    as City,
           T2.ADMIN_NAME as Municipality
      FROM GUTDATA           T1
           LEFT OUTER JOIN
           AUSTRALIAN_STATES T2
           ON (t2.admin_name =  to_char(t1.ID) OR
               SDO_ANYINTERACT(T2.GEOM, SDO_GEOM.SDO_BUFFER(T1.GEOM,10000,0.5,'UNIT=M')) = 'TRUE');(I leave it to you to see if you can see why as the LEFT OUTER JOIN seems to be working correctly for me but I am not going to dedicate time to detailed checking of results.)
    Note all tests performed on Oracle 11g R2 (11.2.0.1.0)
    If you get the answer you want: mark the post as answered to assign points.
    regards
    Simon

  • Left outer join 3 tables with where-statement

    Hi folks,
    I hope you can understand (and maybe solve) my problem.
    Generally I try to left outer join three tables. The third table is used for a WHERE-statement.
    The three table structures are the following:
    table 1 (user)   
    user1 | key
    table 2 (detail)  
    key | ID
    table 3 (header)
    ID | user2                 
    ...and I want to achieve the following structure (as example filled with data):
    user | key | ID
    |-----|----
    xy    | a    | 001
    xy    | b    | #
    z     | b     | #
    The clue ist the usage of the third table. I need the table to set user1 and user2 equal (WHERE) but there are two problems:
    1) Obviously I can't left outer join two tables with each other. In this case I already used the 'key' of table 1 to join it with the 'key' of table 2. So I can't left outer join the 'ID' of table 2 with the 'ID' of table 3. Error message that I can only left outer join a table once. Any proposals?
    2) I have to include a WHERE to equal user1 with user2. But I am not allowed to use the user2 from table 3 because of the left outer join.
    I tried this coding:
    SELECT auser1 akey b~id INTO TABLE itab FROM ( table1 AS a
      LEFT OUTER JOIN table2 AS b ON akey = bkey )
      LEFT OUTER JOIN table3 AS c ON bID = cID )
      WHERE auser1 = cuser2.
    I would really appreciate your help.
    Regards
    MrclSpdl

    IF you want to join a DB table with an internal table, you need to use the 'FOR ALL ENTRIES' statement.
    select dbfields
    into table itab2
    from dbtab
    for all entries in itab
    where dbfield1 = itab-field1.
    This will get you a second internal table with all the corresponding data for the first selection.  You can then join them with a loop through the first table and a read table on the second table (for 1 - 1 relation) or a nested loop statement on both tables (for 1 - N relation).  Make itab a hashed table when using read table with key, use a sorted table if you need to loop without key access.
    Regards,
    Freek

  • BI Infoset left outer join  (NW04s)

    I created an Infoset using a left outer join for infoproviders:
    - 0FIGL_O10 (GL transaction figures - DSO )
    - 0CCA_C03 (CCA Statistical key figures - CUBE)
    DSO 0FIGL_O10 is the left table with joins on:
    - 0COSTCENTER
    - 0FISCPER
    The data set returned by Infoset appears to be based on a SQL using an
    inner join.
    This appears to be a bug.
    We are on BI 700 SP 15.

    Hi Raynald - I did a demo with few records and it works fine for me.  We are on 7, SP14.

  • Left Outer Join Not working in BI 7.0 Infoset

    Hi All,
    I am working on BI 7.0. I have to create a report where I have to display the Target values from a target DSO against the transactional data (Operational data).
    I have a DSO where for a “subteam” value target has been set up on different KPIs.
    In the Info Cube, I have transactional data on daily basis per “subteam”. I have to show the actual and target values.
    I have created an Info Set using Target DSO and Daily operational cube, so that I should able to compare the target and actual values of KPIs, for all the “subteam” values (From DSO, irrespective of whether the data is available in cube for those sub team).
    I have used Outer Left Join in the Info set (DSO on left side), but I am unable to see the desired results. It is working just like an inner join.
    Any Idea why the Outer Left Join is not working? The DSO has only one fey field called “subteam” on which I have set outer left join.
    Regards,
    Amit

    Hi,
    did you solve your problem? because I have the same issue right now: the left outer join doesn't seem to do its job.
    Let me know if you have found a solution, it would be appreciated.
    have a nice day,
    Dominic

  • Left Outer Join with more than two tables in both CR 8.5 and XIR2

    I am trying to create a report and I have tried two versions of Crystal but I ultimately need the report in CR8.5 for compatibility with the client's system.  I think I am starting to figure out what might be wrong and it might be my understanding of SQL, but I can't see why someone hasn't needed this in the past. Ultimately I want to see all projects and any journal entry that might be posted for that project.
    Database is MySQL 5.0.38 and using MySQL ODBC driver 3.51.19.
    Project header table information will be populated. Each line item on a journal entry can be tagged with the project ID. But for me to pull the journal entry date I need also to link to a third table for the journal entry header info.
    I want to see all projects, whether a journal entry has been posted or not.
    So the links are like this
    ProjectHeader --->Left Outer Join ---> JELines ---> Inner Join ---> JEHeader
    I think in this scenerio Crystal is treating the LOJ as an IJ.
    I created two brand new reports today, one in CR8.5 and one in CR XIR2. Once I edited the automatic CR8.5 SQL statement (which I have been doing for years, usually without problem), they both ran properly. I linked customers to their invoices. Customers without invoices showed properly. But then I linked the invoices to the payments of the invoices and immediately lost customers without orders in both reports.
    So apparently only two tables are allowed in Outer Joins. Does this make sense?  I checked out the w3schools tutorial on SQL and it doesn't mention this limitation and I can't find anywhere else that it specifically indicates this but all samples of code I have seen only show two tables.  I just thought for presentation as a sample that was easiest to understand and we could expand as necessary.
    If this is correct, how does one go about accounting for this kind of thing?  One solution that goes through my mind is creating a view at the database level for the link between journal entry lines and journal entry headers.  Would this be a good solution under normal circumstances?
    A second option that I had to implement because of timelines, is to use a subreport linked to the main report through the project ID to pull the information for the journal entries and just pass the totals I need to the main report through a shared variable.
    These aren't normal circumstances because I don't have access to the database so I can't create the view.  I have come across this concept several times and I have been able to use subreports to solve it but I am trying to find a better solution for the future as sometimes subreports can be slow.  So are there any alternatives I have not considered here?
    TIA rasinc

    So after some more work and another post.  I was able to get this to work.
    Items disappear when linking to another table
    My issues were two fold.  I was selecting on the tables on the right-side of the original Inner Join.  However, I was checking for Nulls.  This apparently is correct but you must check for the Nulls first eg. (IsNull (JEHeader.Field1) OR JEHeader.Field1 <= 100).  I had my original statement reversed checking for <= 100 before checking for Nulls.
    I also did not set all links to be Left Outer Join.  I had the Inner Join.  I actually have about 6 tables in this report so all the links need to be set Outer Join.  So this now seems to be corrected.
    Thanks

  • Left outer join problem -- need feedback

    using crystal 2008
    haveing prolbems with a left outerjoin to get a blank field(null) to show up.
    basically i have some po line have have long descriptions or text fields that i want to include with the report. Below is my sql statement. I have written a formula with a join between 2 fields to get the report to work- this does but- it leave the polines off that do not have a long description.  I have tried left outer joins but seem to be having problems.  The long description field where the data is actually at is under my po.line table, although serveral area have long description fields -
    *one note i had to add a duplicate table to the field to get some items in my header to work properly - not sure if this is effecting the report or not.
    OK- when I set up the link to a LO join enforce from = to
    and dont add the ldtext.field to the report the left outjoin works(but no long description)and all my line items show up.
    1. when I keep the same join and add either just the ld.text field to  the report it comes back with a error saying invalid table
    2. when i use my formula that joins the ld.text and po.line and place it in the report with the same left outerjoin i get the same failure.
    3.  when i dont reference the ldtext(field) at all in the report it works fine w/ the lo join
    4. when i Dont use a left outer join and use my formula(see below)
    if not isnull(({LONGDESCRIPTION.LDTEXT }))
    then {POLINE.DESCRIPTION}+{LONGDESCRIPTION.LDTEXT}
    else {POLINE.DESCRIPTION}
    and link from poline.ld
    to ld.ldtext - my formula works and populates the po.line and the ld.text together - except that any po.line with no description will not show up. Like its not there.
    Not sure what to do?
    here is my current sql statement with the longdescription field in the select statement
    here is the error statement i am getting:
    Failed to retrieve data from the database:
    Details:42000[intersolv][odb sql base driver][sql base] 00906 itn invalid table name[database vendor code:906]
    sql statement:
    SELECT "PO"."PONUM", "PO"."STATUS", "PO"."VENDOR",
    "COMPANIES"."NAME", "COMPANIES"."ADDRESS1",
    "COMPANIES"."ADDRESS2", "COMPANIES"."ADDRESS3",
    "COMPANIES"."ADDRESS4", "COMPANIES"."PHONE",
    "COMPANIES"."FAX", "COMPANIES_1"."NAME",
    "COMPANIES_1"."ADDRESS1", "COMPANIES_1"."ADDRESS2",
    "COMPANIES_1"."ADDRESS3", "COMPANIES_1"."ADDRESS4",
    "COMPANIES_1"."CONTACT", "COMPANIES_1"."PHONE",
    "COMPANIES_1"."FAX", "PO"."PURCHASEAGENT",
    "PO"."ORDERDATE",
    "PO"."REQUIREDDATE", "PO"."PAYMENTTERMS",
    "PO"."SHIPVIA", "PO"."FREIGHTTERMS", "PO"."FOB",
    "POLINE"."DESCRIPTION", "POLINE"."ITEMNUM",
    "POLINE"."ORDERQTY", "POLINE"."UNITCOST",
    "POLINE"."LOADEDCOST", "POLINE"."POLINENUM",
    "PO"."SHIPTOATTN", "LONGDESCRIPTION"."LDTEXT"
    FROM   ("MAXIMO"."PO" "PO" LEFT OUTER JOIN
    "MAXIMO"."LONGDESCRIPTION" "LONGDESCRIPTION" ON "PO"."LDKEY"="LONGDESCRIPTION"."LDKEY"),
    "MAXIMO"."POLINE" "POLINE",
    "MAXIMO"."COMPANIES" "COMPANIES_1",
    "MAXIMO"."COMPANIES" "COMPANIES"
    WHERE  ("PO"."PONUM"="POLINE"."PONUM") AND ("PO"."VENDOR"="COMPANIES_1"."COMPANY") AND ("PO"."SHIPTO"="COMPANIES"."COMPANY") AND "PO"."PONUM"='3386-053'

    If you took the time to read this thanks.... turns out... and I just want to pull my hair out over this.  My connection had a  old odbc driver so somehow it would not allow a left outer join....go figure - weeks of agony over that..... thanks ....have to say love this forum.

  • Filter on "---" in Left Outer Join Query

    Hi guys,
    very basic question but I have not found an answer, yet. I built an left outer join MDO query and need to select all those dataset that did not find a "partner", that is fields are set to "---". However, I do not manage to filter on '---', NULL...
    When using SQL, it appears to be a String "---" but in MDO???

    Hey guys, found out that IS NULL needs to be used in query. Anyway, it appears to cause problems somewhere else.
    I placed an IS NULL filter expression inside a join query but query did not return any results when called in by transaction. After removing this line, both NULL and NOT NULL data were returned. When used in test mode, IS NULL was working fine...

  • Left Outer Join Help...

    Hi Everyone,
    I am still in the process of learning SQL, and I am having trouble specifically with the the left outer join.  I normally join tables using equijoin's, but I am not getting the right data set returns, and thought the using a left or right outer join would resolve the problem...
    Here is my SQL that is working properly with 1 left outer join.  I am building the query slowly so in the next SQL you will see where I am seeing the error.  I don't expect you to understand the data and columns I am trying to join, I believe the problems I am experiencing are related to syntax, and I am hoping you can find where my syntax errors are.
    select
      s.name as "Screen Name",
      sv.view_name as "View Name",
      s_view.name
    from
      s_screen s,
      s_screen_view sv
      left outer join s_view
      ON (sv.view_name = s_view.name)
    where
      sv.screen_id = '1-866A-1X3LU' and
      s.row_id = sv.screen_id and
      s.repository_id = '1-866A-1' and
      s_view.repository_id = '1-866A-1';
    Here is the SQL where I am experiencing the following error...
    Error:
    ORA-00904: "SV"."VIEW_NAME": invalid identifier
    00904. 00000 -  "%s: invalid identifier"
    *Cause:   
    *Action:
    Error at Line: 14 Column: 7
    Problematic SQL:
    select
      s.name as "Screen Name",
      sv.view_name as "View Name",
      s_view.name,
      s_applet.name as Applet
      --a.name as "Applet Name"
    from
      s_screen s,
      s_screen_view sv,
      s_view_wtmpl_it wti
      left outer join s_view
      ON (sv.view_name = s_view.name)
      left outer join s_applet
      ON (wti.name = s_applet.name)
    where
      sv.screen_id = '1-866A-1X3LU' and
      s.row_id = sv.screen_id and
      s.repository_id = '1-866A-1' and
      s_view.repository_id = '1-866A-1';
    Thanks in advance for your help.
    Chris

    Hi,
    cjpicc11 wrote:
    What is an Oracle style join vs. ANSI join?
    Would this be Oracle Style or ANSI Join?
      left outer join s_view
      ON (sv.view_name = s_view.name)
      left outer join s_applet
    Would this be Oracle Style or ANSI Join?
    s.row_id = sv.screen_id
    "Oracle style" or "old style" joins have commas between tables in the FROM clause, and the join conditions are all in the WHERE clause.  They do not use the keywords JOIN or ON.
    ANSI style joins have the keyword JOIN between tables (sometimes accompanied by other keywords, such as LEFT, OUTER or CROSS), and the join conditions are given in the FROM clause, usually after the keyword ON.
    The first example you gave is an ANSI style join.  It has the JOIN keyword, not a comma, between tables.
    The second example you gave:
    s.row_id = sv.screen_id
    could be part of either.  It could occur in an ANSI join (in the FROM clause, after the keyword ON), or it could occur in an old-style join (in the WHERE clause).

  • Left outer join functions like simple join

    I created two views SCO_REQGROSSLINES_V & SCO_REQLINESCOMPLETE on Oracle requisitions base tables. Our business rules enforce the following identity: the number of gross requisition lines will always be greater than or equal to the number of requisition lines complete. (By complete I mean delivered.)
    Each view has a key named DATESUBINV_KEY constructed of a transaction date and the subinventory code using this logic:
    , TO_CHAR(TRUNC(transaction_date),'YYYYMMDD') || subinventory_code
    On 03-SEP-2010 a user created a requisition with one line item for material from the HEAT subinventory which was not delivered. This row is retuned in the result set when I query on SCO_REQGROSSLINES_V but is NOT returned when I query on SCO_REQLINESCOMPLETE. So far so good.
    When I issue either of the the following left outer joins I do not get the row for the row for the HEAT subinventory on 03-SEP-2010:
    select rgl.trxn_date
    , rgl.subinventory
    , rgl.line_count gross_line_count
    , rgl.ext_prc gross_value
    , rlc.line_count lines_filled
    , rlc.ext_prc lines_filled_value
    from SCO_REQGROSSLINES_V rgl left outer join sco_reqlinescomplete_v rlc
    ON rgl.datesubinv_key = rlc.datesubinv_key
    where rgl.TRXN_DATE BETWEEN to_date('29-AUG-2010') AND to_date('04-SEP-2010')
    and rlc.trxn_date BETWEEN to_date('29-AUG-2010') AND to_date('04-SEP-2010')
    order by rgl.trxn_date, rgl.subinventory
    select rgl.trxn_date, rgl.subinventory
    , rgl.line_count gross_line_count
    , rgl.ext_prc gross_value
    , rlc.line_count lines_filled
    , rlc.ext_prc lines_filled_value
    from SCO_REQGROSSLINES_V rgl
    , sco_reqlinescomplete_v rlc
    where rgl.TRXN_DATE BETWEEN to_date('29-AUG-2010') AND to_date('04-SEP-2010')
    and rlc.trxn_date BETWEEN to_date('29-AUG-2010') AND to_date('04-SEP-2010')
    AND rgl.datesubinv_key = rlc.datesubinv_key(+)
    order by rgl.trxn_date, rgl.subinventory
    Question: Why would the left outer joins function as a simple join on DATESUBINV_KEY? Do keys on views function differently than keys defined in the data dictionary? If they do how can I make these keys to function like data dictionary keys?

    Hi,
    The WHERE clause is applied after the outer join is completed. In your example, rows from rgl will be in the result set even if they have no match in rlc. In those cases, all the columns from rlc will be NULL.
    Okay, so you have these rows that contain data from rgl but NULLs where the data from rlc was supposed to go. Now it's time to start the WHERE clause. You then apply conditions like this in the WHERE clause:
    AND     rlc.trxn_date BETWEEN ...NULL is between anything, so the row that the outer join prodeuced is rejected.
    All conditions involivn columns from rlc probably need to be part of the join condition, not the WHERE clause.
    For example, in you first query the FROM and WHERE clauses might be:
    FROM          sco_reqgrosslines_v      rgl
    LEFT OUTER JOIN  sco_reqlinescomplete_v  rlc  ON    rgl.datesubinv_key   = rlc.datesubinv_key
                                            AND   rlc.trxn_date       BETWEEN TO_DATE ( '29-AUG-2010'
                                                                        , 'DD-MON-YYYY'
                                                  AND       TO_DATE ( '04-SEP-2010'
                                                              , 'DD-MON-YYYY'
    WHERE   rgl.trxn_date     BETWEEN TO_DATE ( '29-AUG-2010'
                             , 'DD-MON-YYYY'
                   AND     TO_DATE ( '04-SEP-2010'
                             , 'DD-MON-YYYY'
                             )Always use (at least) two arguments when calling TO_DATE.
    Conditions that only involve rgl can be in the WHERE clause, but if any conditions from rlc are in the WHERE clause, then the effect will be the same as an inner join.
    There no difference between tables and views (or sub-queries) in this regard: the same thing would happen regardless of whether rgl and rlc were really tables or not.

Maybe you are looking for

  • XOQ-01950: Cube contains multiple BuildSpecifications with the same name.

    Hi All , While executing the Maintain Cube option it is throwing below issue : Any Clue ? XOQ-01950: The AWCubeOrganization for cube "NN_OLAP_POC.MARKET_SALES_CUBE" contains multiple BuildSpecifications with the same name. Thanks, DxP

  • How to create 2 scroll bar in 2 canvas

    Hello All, I will appreciate if somebody knows how to create 2 scroll bars in 2 Content canvases and all items text item belongs to one data block. In data block property it shows only one scroll bar. Their is no property of scroll bar in canvas. Reg

  • Delete modify in itab

    hi gurus, i am new in abap and i have a report in which in a selection screen has 3 fields as months cur. date and material no. and two parameters as chkbox on selection of these chkbox one for delete and other for modify data in table. plz send the

  • BAPI not working correctly

    Dear Experts,      I use this BAPI for creation of interest rate Instrument 'BAPI_FTR_IRATE_CREATE' .While executing the BAPI it gives financial transaction number. When checking transaction BAPI at table like VTBFHA not available. Please help me. Th

  • I'm Trying this New CAM for the First Time  7240

    Brokers, Inc. Specializes in Sourcing Operating Systems and Application Software from liquidators or Overstocked suppliers. We then offer these incredible findings to the public at unbelievable savings... New Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional Web S