Net price not fetching to new PO thru' existing PO for same vendor

While creating new PO for a material system is not fetching "net price" data from already existing PO for same material against same vendor.
This is happening after attaching OMET settings in User authorisation.
How to solve this issue?

Hi,
This shoudl not happen but still you try in OMET - For the Key, allow indicator "Enter Conditions" and then check.
Also check if any key has been created in OMFI and assigned to user parameter EVO. - Here in OMFI, check under "Price Adoption" Tab, "Always Copy" radio button should be selected if you want to copy last PO price in current PO.

Similar Messages

Hi, I have Lightroom 4, but it does not support the new 10-30 pd lens for my Nikon 1. It is supported in LR5. Can I download this lens profile and install in LR4?

Hi, I have Lightroom 4, but it does not support the new 10-30 pd lens for my Nikon 1. It is supported in LR5. Can I download this lens profile and install in LR4?

Do you have the latest camera raw installed for Photoshop? If so, you can find the profiles in /Library/Application\ Support/Adobe/CameraRaw/LensProfiles/1.0/Nikon/ . Lightroom should recognize them if you move them into your home directory's Library folder in the exact same folder structure (but in the Library folder in your home directory). This is assuming you are using Mac OS X. No clue where these files would be on Windows. If you don't have Photoshop, you can install Camera Raw using the combined installer with DNG converter which is a free download from Adobe. This should (I think) give you the profiles in that exact location without owning Photoshop.

Receive message when downloading ITunes or Safari for Windows 7 64 Bit. "Installation package could not be opened. Verify package exists or contact application vendor to verify this is a valid Windows Installer package."

Received message when trying to install Itunes or Safari for Windows. " Installation package could not be opened. Verify package exists or contact application vendor to verify this is a valid Windows Installer package".

I to am having the same issue. I have a admin account and logged into it as well and still have the same message pop up. Contacted live support the woman i spoke with had to send it up higher. We went through every thing including her trying (taking over as a host on my laptop) still have not bee contacted this June will be a year that i have heard nothing from them sine She di everything she could and pushed it up higher.

Net price not picking from info record

I am creating a new PO, but net price is not picking from info record. Info record is getting copied in the line item for PO, but net price is not copied. Due to that I am unable to create PO. If I manually enter price PO can be created. Could someone tell me what might be the reason Price is not automatically taken from Info Record. Please guide me what all I need to check.
The same data is working in one cleint, and in another client this data is facing problem.
Thanks
Vineeth

Hi
1) If there is condition record exit in system,then while creating po system will take condition record
2) If In inforecord last po number is exist for material and vendor ,then system will take this into consideration
3) if your creating po first time for material and vendor ,and we have maintain purchasing inforecord for purchasing organization and for plant,then system will take it into consideration
40 If none is available we have to put condition manually in po
Regards
Kailas ugale

Line item net price not updated in overview screen net price&line item

Hi ,
We have down payment order with 10 line items
In orders with billing plan, the sales line item net price, if we entered manual condition price (ZPNP) ,gets updated in item condition net value. But it does not simultaneously gets updated at once in 1) Sales order overview screen net value 2) Billing plan header 3)Sales order overview screen line item condition net value. Updation at these three places happens only after clicked on header conditions.
However, in case of the last item in the sales order, the updation happens simultaneously in all the 3 places i.e. 1) item condition net value. 2) Sales order overview screen net value 3) Billing plan header 4) Sales order overview screen line item condition net value.
This is also true for the order with only single line item. We are faced a information popup message every time we change the item net price u201CItem 000100(100 is last line item number in sales order) exists already; the entry ignored u201C. This happens in case of all line items except the last line item. Also this does not happen in case where there is a single line item in order.
Our requirement: The moment the net price of an item is change manually, it should get updated at all the 4 places mentioned above like it does in case of the last line item.
Kindly help me to fix this problem.
Regards,
Adikesav

Hi,
Can u elaborate ur query ?
By this FM you cannot create a SO . Use FM --> BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT2
Regards,
MAdhukar Shetty

Purchase Order Net Price not editable after GR/IR

Hi Friends!
I am facing a problem that, I want the price of the Purchase Order document should not be changed after the GR or IR is posted for this document.
I have checked that making the net price field as display or M/06 is not the solution of the above mentioned problem.
Can anyone help?

Hi,
If you want the price not to be changeable, set the tolerances in the IMG menu:
MM -> PUR -> PO -> Set tolerance limits.
Cheers

PIR net price not follow the condition screen

Hi all,
I have a question regarding my pricing condition maintained in a PIR.
In one of my PIR record, there is two validity line records in the pricing condition with the following date range and value:
1 - 2008.04.01 to 2010.12.31 ==> PB00 is USD853,00/1 PC
2 - 2011.01.01 to 2999.12.31 ==> PB00 is USD853,00/1 PC
However, the strange thing is that in the Purchasing Org screen in the PIR, the NET price value is "879,00 per 1pc" even with the VALID-TO field value as "2999.12.31".
May I know why the the Net price in this view not picking up the USD853? Something go wrong in the PIR?
(in between the Pr Date Category is 2-delivery date).
Please help.
tuff

Hi Jurgen,
I am still a little bit confuse as of why in the Purchasing Org screen in the PIR, the NET price value is "879,00 per 1pc" even with the VALID-TO field value as "2999.12.31".
Question1-
Shouldn't the above field automatically pick-up what is maintained in the condition screen of the most latest pricing record which is the USD853,00 for the second line item I described previously?
Question2 -
What have caused the 879,00 being inserted into the Purchasing Org screen in the PIR, the NET price field? where is this USD879,00 coming from??
Thanks and please help.
Tuff

ME31K Net Price not Update

Dear All,
In a service contract ME31K net price(ESLL- NETWR) of service not updated.its shown zero value in gray field on every time.
We are using standard procedure for service contract :MS0000".and also i have check PRS condition but it doesn't work.
I have also read many thought relelated to same issue but not getting proper answer.
Please help on priority basis.
Thanks & Regards,
Dishant Mistry

Dear Dishant,
Just a clarification, are you sure that you are talking about ESLL- NETWR, since usually we maintain price for service contracts in ESLL-TBTWR (Service level), so that automatically it calculates the net value for the respective service and updates in ESLL- NETWR.
Note: Once you maintain the value in ESLL-TBTWR, the program would some up all the service value for the item and displays in EKPO-NETPR.
Please find the below screenshots for your reference.
Please let me know, if you require any clarification.
Thanks & Regards,
Narayana N

STO net price not appearing

I am trying to do STO between 2 different company codes with itemcategory U.
I maintained all the settings in OMGN, have vendor master, customer master and shipping data. Now, when i try to create my STO, the net price field is not even there (its totally suppressed). Since its between 2 different company codes, SD billing is there and i need net price column in the STO.
Can anyone tell me, what i am missing.
Help apprecaited.
Thanks,
Sylvia

Thanks for your reply.
We use a custom field selection key for STO's and i checked the fields and now, NET PRICE field in Purchase order is greyed out.
Any idea?
Sylvia
Edited by: Sylvia Hernandez on Jul 31, 2008 1:47 AM

Net Price not Updating Using BAPI : BAPI_CONTRACT_CREATE

Dear Experts,
I am facing an issue while creating CONTRACT using the bapi: BAPI_CONTRACT_CREATE. I am creating the Contract based on data from my excel sheet. And we are maintaining the INFO RECORDS for the same materials.
In the excel sheet we are providing the NetPrice (NETPR) and creating the Contract. My issue is " instead of taking the Net Price from the excel it is taking the Net Price from Info Records". For Example, if for a Particular material the Net Price in our excel file is 125, after bapi execution, the net price is updating as 100 instead of 125 in Contract Creation( ME31k-ME33K). In the Info Records we are maintaining this net price(100) for that material.
Thanks in Advance for your response.
Regards,
Prasad

you can use BAPI_CONTRACT_CREATEFROMDATA
* Create Contract Order Number [BAPI_CONTRACT_CREATEFROMDATA]
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_CONTRACT_CREATEFROMDATA'
       EXPORTING
         contract_header_in      = header
         convert                 = 'X'
       IMPORTING
         salesdocument           = v_order
       TABLES
         return                  = t_return
         contract_items_in       = itab_item
         contract_items_inx      = itemx
         contract_partners       = t_partners
         contract_conditions_in = t_conds
         contract_conditions_inx = t_condsx
         contract_data_in        = t_contract
         contract_text           = t_texts.

Was not informed of new policy when signing up for service and charged for services I did not knowingly agree to.

I’m writing to contest a $29.99 monthly charge, which is contracted for 24 months amounting to $720 in total. The charge is for a data plan which I did not knowingly agree to, and verizon is unwilling to remove from the account even though the phone on the line does NOT use data.
The backstory of the issue:
On September 19, 2014 I waited in line at an Apple store to purchase a new iPhone on launch day. I opened a new basic line of service for $9.99 a month on my account so I could purchase a discounted phone from Verizon. When purchasing the phone, the representative explained that he was going to have to put a basic data package on the line for $15 a month, but that it would be removed once I transferred the phone to an existing line on the account. After the purchase was complete, we transferred the phone to an exisitng line, and the represented confirmed that the data package would not be charged to my account and therefore I would only have to pay $9.99 a month for the basic line of service for two years. A couple weeks pass and I receive my bill, I notice that the data plan is still listed on my account and has also increased to $29.99 a month! I call Verizon to see what is going on, they tell me that they have just implemented a new policy that states if I purchased a smart phone on a basic account and then transfer the phone to a differnt line that I will have to pay $29.99 a month for data even if the new phone that is currently on the line does not use data! I told them I was not informed of this, and was actually told the complete opposite when signing up for service. They refuse to remove the data package, and will not let me cancel the account without charging me $350. The representative on the phone said that the representative in the store was a sales person and most likely did not have the training to inform them of the new policy change, and that they could not honor what he told me.
I should be able to rely on and trust what a Verizon wireless representative is telling me, I was not aware of the new policy and did not knowingly agree to this policy. And in that case, I would like to point out that I have been a loyal Verizon customer for over 15 years humbly request that you clear this $29.99 monthly charge from my account as a gesture of good faith.
I have spent over 7 hours on the phone with verizon trying to get this resolved to no avail. I have also filed a complaint with the attorney generals office, and plan to persue this until it is fully resolved.

Customer Agreement | Verizon Wireless
This agreement and the documents it incorporates form the entire agreement between us. You can't rely on any other documents, or on what's said by any Sales or Customer Service Representatives, and you have no other rights regarding Service or this agreement.
They gotcha! And that policy change was listed here and other places on the net.
Its either pay that or the early termination fees.
Verizon will not grant you a mistake forgiveness clause.
If they do it for you they would have to do it for everyone.
Good Luck

Output not getting proposed from a Purchase Order just for One vendor

Hi All,
We have an issue where in we have maintained a condition record with the access as "Purchase Doc type (NB) and Purchase Organization(XXXX):" pointing towards a "LS" partner function (ALE) and "4"
We have also maintained Partner configuration correctly. The issue which happens only in Production and not in TEst systems which is " only for ONE VENDOR the output is not getting proposed and for the other vendors it is getting proposed correctly. We also have a requirement attached to the Output and we do not have any vendor specific logic.
We also checked /Compared both the test and production system on Output Configuration as well as master data for VEndor and Info records and they seem to be ok.
Does any one faced a similar situation why an Output would not propose just for one specific vendor?
Would appreciate if any one can reply asap.
Thanks,

Then check with the requirement you are using bd64 is distribution model.
Check with ur output type, requirement and output determination. ale service comes only in picture partner profile with outbound parameters.
have u done the correct entries under message control in outbound parameters.
thanks
Aman

Firefox 3.6.8 not compatible with new HP 4-in-1 for printing from web - any solution?

I have installed a new HP printer-copier-scanner-fax machine on a new Dell laptop (Model: Inspiron 15R, with Windows 7). This HP product (Model: CQ521A) has the capability of printing from the web. But at the time of installation I have received the warning that this device is not compatible for use with Firefox 3.6.8. Perhaps this is because Firefox 3.6.8 was developed later than this product, but does Firefox have a solution?

Is your problem with the HP Smart Web Printing program, specifically?
''Compatibility with specific programs shouldn't be an issue unless unless the installer is trying to install something into a not-compatible program - like SWP installs an addon into Firefox, and IE.''
This page indicates SWP only supports IE 6, 7, &8 - http://www.hp.com/global/us/en/consumer/digital_photography/free/software/smart-web-printing.html - but I have seen in this forum that other Firefox users have been able to use SWP with Firefox 3.6.x versions, once they got a Firefox 3.6.x compatible version of SWP.
''Edit: I just downloaded the SmartWeb Printing application from here - http://www.hp.com/global/us/en/consumer/digital_photography/free/software/smart-web-printing.html?jumpid=ex_r602_go/swp - and opened it. I don't see any files within that package that add's support for Firefox. It looks like HP doesn't support Firefox any longer. Unless they have another download page that I didn't find.''
Or, see the HP Web Printing support forum for an answer.
http://h30434.www3.hp.com/t5/Web-Printing/bd-p/Webprint

Why does the new update not recognize my new charger that i bought for my iphone ? it worked before but not anymore !!!

i recently bought a new charger 2 months ago at best buy . (black friday sale) ! it worked so perfectly fine until today . i guess it's the new update ?! i don't really like it because the charger is a really good one . my warranty expired in december , and my charger burnt out like the other two chargers i had ....

Apple tried making it so iOS only allows "made for iPhone devices". You will have to get a different cable in order for it to work again.
If you need just the USB section of it, amazon sells a nice cable, for a few bucks less than apple and it is a lot better made.

My software update for itunes showed on my pc a notice saying mobilme services has encountered a problem I reinstalled the software and still showing this problem on my PC I can not download the new version of my software for itunes.

Please help,
I have a problem with installing a software update on my PC I have a a message that reads MobileMe Services has encountered a problemand needs
to close. I have taken uninstalled and installed it again it still shoes the message. Please contact me. I can't load the software.
Diana Puskas

See Troubleshooting issues with iTunes for Windows updates.
tt2

Net price not fetching to new PO thru' existing PO for same vendor

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for