Net value is not reflecting from order to Invoice

Hi,
I need some clarification here: I can able to see the Net value in the sales order  but the same thing is not reflecting in to the invoice.
What could be the reason and Error message is : Pricing error in ITEM  000010 in Invoice.
Your suggestions are most welcome.

Dear,
there may be the incomplete in the order. one condition is missing in the sales order.
This is because of condition record of particular condition is not maintained at the time of sales order.
you can update the pricing in the order if Invoice is not generated . If invoice is generated you can update in invoice itself.
If your query wiill be resolved then reward me.
Regards,
Narasimha

Similar Messages

  • Reg: Pricing Procedure - Net Value is not reflected

    Hi Guru's,
    I  am new to this concept. I do created a Pricing procedure for a material wrt vendors..
        I do created conditions types - Gross Value,Discount,Freight & Tax 
      My Schema is working fine.
         My issue is the total value of my schema after the tax calculation is not the value reflected in Net value of PO.
              only single line item (single material i doing PO). Kindly guide me to solve this issue.
    Regards
    Anandh

    Dear Umakanth
    Thanks for you reply. As if u told only the subtotal is reflected as Net value in PO.
        In my scenario - Calculation schema is
            C4     Gross Price                     20.00              40.00      INR                                        
         C5     Discount % on Gross     20.000-     %     8.00-     INR                                        
                                       Subtotal     16.00           32.00      INR                                  
         C6     Freight/Quantity             10.00            20.00      INR                                        
                                        Subtotal     26.00           *52.00      INR     *                          
         C7     Statistical Value(tax)      10.000      %     5.20      INR                                        
                                      TOTAL     28.60           57.20      INR
        The Net value reflected is 52.20
                              What about the total value 57.20
        Where the effective value plays the role in  PO and where its displayed in PO. The invoice/Payment  is issued based on Net Value or Effective Value.
              Kindly explain me in detail - Since i am new to this..
    Regards
    Anandh
    Edited by: smileanandh on Dec 6, 2010 3:20 AM

  • Condition records not copied from order to invoice

    Hi,
    I created an order and it has contion types for Frieght cost and packing cost...for both condition rocrds were found and triggered in order but whn cheked in invoice...records are not copied to invocie level..and when checked in analysis it says "access not made" for both the conditions...
    Fields combination for these are shipping point and material frieght group for both condition types...
    i checked the validity dates for both conditions and are still in validity dats.
    Can anyone advice me is there some thing else i need to check and why condition records are not copied to invoice.
    Thanks in advance
    Balu

    Hi Sumanth,
    Copy controls are fine...it is actually delivery related billing scenarios..and in delivery to billing copy contrls in header in determine export dat feild it is set to "B :Redetermine the export data" and at tiem level the pricing type is set to "C:Copy manual pricing elements and redetermine the others"
    Kindly let me know if the settings are fine or the problem is woth these settings
    Regards
    Balaji

  • Rounding Off Value is not copying from Sales Order to Invoice

    Hi Experts,
    In Pricing Procedure i maintained DIFF- Rounding Off Condition type with the following Combinations.
    Print:X
    Requirement:13
    Cal Type: 16
    Bas Type: 4
    When i create sales order the system is calculating Rounding Off after saving the sales order.The requirement is that it should shows the rounding off value before saving the sales order.Secondly when i make invoice the rounding off value is not copying from the saved sales order.After i save the invoice in VF02 the rounding off value is coming .
    Regards
    Subhasish

    Cond type DIFF has cond catgory L Generally new when copying. So the value from sales order will not be copied, it will be redetermined in invoice.
    Also rounding off cond is to round the total value which can change in invoice based on the invoice qty.

  • Batch Job for ME59N getting error SE133 - Net value could not be determined

    HI,
    We can convert the PO automatically when run manually tcode ME59N  successfully.
    But when We schedule a batch job to run ME59N (RM06BB30) to create AUTO Purchase order for services item Purchase requistion.
    Getting error message SE133 "Net value could not be determined".  PO canot be converted automatically.

    Hi,
    Price/ Net value not picking!
    Check  info record  based on  Material Group for your service PR which need to be converted to PO.
    Also check activation of  Automatic Purchase order creation for Service requisitions in t.code: ML91.
    Check vendor master , schema group of vendor and check MM pricing procedure, the availability of condition type for service master for service PO.
    For more please read note 635511
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Net Price does not reflect on Consignment PO even after maintaining info re

    Dear Experts,
    I have created consignment PO but the net price does not reflect on it. I have already maintained valid consignment info record for this material with reference to standard purchasing organization in ME11.
    Would appreciate your views ...
    Cheers !
    Sachin Narvekar

    Hi,
    the system behaviour is correct here.
    The basic concept of vendor consignment lies in this.
    In this case PO is a request to put his stocks at the company.
    The moment we uses( Transfer from vendor stock to Company's own stock, using 411, or direct issue to cost centres using 201K) this stock, liability will be generated.
    Then the price from the info record will be used as well as the tax code.
    Then u can run a settlement transation , for payment settlements.
    Until the moment u uses the stock, it will be vendors stock only, thats why only Issue create liability.
    So the system behaviour is correct.
    Regards
    Krishna

  • Updated (VORowImpl ) values are not reflected in inline POPUP table

    Hi Expert,
    Currently i am getting exception when i try to update my iterator binding,
    Here is my use case,
    I have view object displayed inside the inline popup as a table. When i modify one of the cell i am firing the value change listener and it is called the ViewObjectRowImpl class method. Inside the method i do some computation (i am executing some DB query to get back some value). After the query execution i am updating the other columns data based on the changes.
    First i have PPR the table and check out the update values. Unfortunately the change values are not reflected.
    Then i used the following code
    DCIteratorBinding itrBinding = findIteratorBinding("EmployeeVO1Iterator");
    if (itrBinding != null) {
    itrBinding.executeQuery();
    itrBinding.refresh(DCIteratorBinding.RANGESIZE_UNLIMITED);
    Now i am getting the " JBO-25003: Object EmployeeMgmtAM of type ApplicationModule is not found."
    May i know what went wrong? Am i missing anything. May i know how can i refresh the UI table based on the updated VORowImpl. Looking forward hints.
    Thanks

    Thanks Frank, Actually i am accessing the client method as follows,
    DCIteratorBinding itrBinding = findIteratorBinding("EmployeeVO1Iterator");
    if (itrBinding != null) {
    EmployeeVORowImpl employeeVO = (EmployeeVORowImpl)itrBinding.getCurrentRow();
    empoyeeVO.methodName();
    May i know what is the different between accessing the method as shown above and access via the MethodBinding?
    How about access the attribute of the View object using the above approach? i.e empoyeeVO.getName() like ....
    Also i have configure the ADF looger to finest level and found the primary reason to "Applicaiton module not found" was some entity validation. But this not always happened. Same test case works fine and fails sometimes. I am clueless. Could you please throw some light.
    Thanks
    Edited by: user1022639 on Feb 7, 2012 5:24 PM

  • Excise Values are not flowing from J1IJ to VF01

    Hi All,
    I am facing the problem in Invoice to Customer(from Depot). Excise Values are not flowing from J1IJ. I maintained Alt Cal type as 356 in Pricing procedure for Excise condition types. Even though its not flowing. I am using Tax Procedure TAXINN.
    I have gone through SDN, everybody is suggesting about 356 routine.
    My scenario is STO from Plant to Depot and Sale from Depot to Customer.
    ME21N->VL10B->VF01(Proforma)->J1IIN->MIGO->VA01(from Depot)->VL01N->J1IJ(Depot Excise)->VF01(Invoice to Customer)
    In J1IJ, excise values are coming but in VF01 it is not coming.
    Kindly help me.
    With Regards
    Azeez.Mohd

    Hi,
    in j1ig initial screen which excise group/series group i need to enter
    is it of supplying plant or depot --- Enter Your Excise group
    If i enter material document no say 5000000265 (corresponds to migo-101 at depot )& year
    it'm getting error message excise invoice already exists for5000000265 --> Check the Year of material document
    You can also use the Excise Invoice Details tab
    Enter Vendor's Ex.Inv.No. , enter your STO's Excise Invoice No. and Click on Own factory and enter factory's Series Group in n case of STO from factory,
    use Depot Excise Invoice in case of transfer from another depot
    and Excise Inv. Date
    On next screen,
    In case of non availability of Internal Excise No., select the line item and click on button. On next screen, enter Excise Inv. No., Date, Challan Qty, Excise Base value, ensure that Excise Duty rates are maintained in respective duty rates column, you can also manually enter the excise duty amount and press Enter . System will give warning messages, press Enter for each message and press Back button. System will display the excise duty amount, check the same and click on Save button.
    Hope this will resolve your issue.
    Regards,
    Krishna O

  • Depot Sales-Excise values are not flowing from J1iJ to VF01

    Hi Gurus,
    In Depot Sales: while doing excise invoive from T-code J1iJ Go to delivery -RG23D selection select the delivery number XXXXX Excise Group 51 and series Group: 50 ENTER - select the line item and click on F6 and here we have to click on excise invoice Button for capturing the Input excise duties for taking the reference. And the excise values are shown here correctly.
    Issue: In VF01- when we are raising the commercial invoice , the duty values are not flowing from the J1IJ transaction. Instead the values are showing Zero for all the three condition types namely JEXP, JECS and JHCS. We have used the Pricing Procedure ZINDEP and 356 routine.
    Inputs on this how to solve will be highly appreciated.. as we are in critical stage.
    What are the checks to be ensured to Get the values flow from J1IJ to VF01.
    Scenario: STO from Mfrg Plant to Depot and Depot sales to customer.
    Me21N-Me29N-VL10B-VL02N-VF01-J1IIn-MIGO-(STO process completes)-VA01-VL01N-J1IJ-VF01(duty values should flow from the J1IJ referenced Excise Invoice) Correct me if I am wrong.
    Any user exits, Notes please let me know. I could not find any. I have gone through the forum threads, which speaks about 356 routine, J1ID- checks etc.
    Thanks&Regards
    Sreekanth:

    Hi!
    Am sure you would have captured the Excise at Depot with J1IG.
    Also, have you saved the billing document to check the duties? 
    Thirdly, after save, again open the billing doc and go to Header-Conditions then Save. This part does not seems logical, but i am sharing my practical experience.
    Please check condition records if any.
    Regards
    Arun

  • Rate and accessable value is not displaying for the tax invoice output

    Hello All,
      Rate and accessable value is not displaying for the tax invoice output. Rest of all outputs for invoices shows Rate and accessable value.
    Scenerio is free of charge sales order (samples) removing the goods from pant so excise invoice has been created and also updated. but for tax invoice out put rate and access value is not displaying.
        Pricing procedure: In pricing procedure account keys have not been maintained because there is not gl account upadation during billing for free of charge delivery.
    Thanks & Regards,
    ramesh

    hi Gurpreet,
    You can add values to that transient column programatically,either by getiing the row from the iterator and then row.setAttribute('Column_name','Value');
    Or providing value to it in the SQL...

  • AP Credit Note copied from AP Reserve Invoice

    Hi all
    AP Credit Note copied from AP Reserve Invoice cannot be posted with missing G/L account error.
    This is similar to error posting AP Reserve Invoice and fixed by SBO version 9 patch 10 in SAP Note 1893780.
    Now the error when posting AP Reserve Invoice is solved but cannot post when copied AP Reserve Invoice to AP Credit Note.
    Kedalene

    Hi
    Please see error message.

  • Purchase Order values are not reflecting in MIGO

    Dear Experts,
    I have changed standared Pricing Procedure from TAXINN to TAXINT because excise calculation was wrong. Now I have assinged new pricing procedure & reflecting in Purchase order & working as per requirement also.But when we are doing MIGO, excise values are not automatically coming in MIGO. So Is there any configuration or missing copy control because i have changed pricing procedure?
    Also I want to put a check, if purchase order value is not matching with vendor invoice value then stores person can't do the MIGO.
    Could any body guide me?
    Thanks
    Trupti

    Hi,                                                                               
    It is not like that you have to mandatory use the TAXINN rather it is recommended by SAP to use but if some business requirement doesnu2019t meet up with what is recommended that its business call to go TAXINJ from TAXINN, but right now we don't know at what circumstances they moved to TAXINJ but question is what are the settings missing while moving from TAXINN to TAXINJ and because of that system is not picking the Tax Values at the time of MIGO in excise capture & posting.
    So I have several questions in mind in order to understand your system behaviour.
    1) Are you using the correct Tax code at PO level?
    2) If using the correct Tax code then is't correct value maintained in FTXP for the Tax code used in PO.
    3) If correct Value maintained in Tax code then by clicking on Taxes button mentioned under PO item level details are you able to see the correct value against each applicable condition type in next screen by clicking over Taxes button in PO?
    4) if not then first check J1id - Material Chapter Id combination, vendor excise indicator mentioned, correct duties maintained in excise duty so check all master data related to CIN maintained in J1id
    So first give answer to above mentioned questions then we procees further but I am sure I can make your system to picked  the correct duties don't worry Just answer my questions hope things become fine in your system.
    Best Regards,
    Silky
    Note: Please assign valuable points in order to encourage contributors to each answer to queries...

  • Line item Net value is not coming in Header Net Value

    Hi All,
    I have four conditions
    1) A condition with condition cat.Price this is annual price condition and condition value comes from condition record.
    2) B condition with condition cat.Discount & Surcharge this is monthly dis. and condition value comes from condition record.
    3) C condition with condition cat.Discount & Surcharge this is monthly dis. and condition value comes through pricing routine(formula value).
    4) D condition with condition cat.Discount & Surcharge this is monthly dis. and condition value comes by USER EXIT (this value is basically pervious month condition C Net value) .
    5) E condition with condition cat.Discount & Surcharge this is monthly dis. and condition value comes through pricing routine (formula is condition C - D and resultant value should come in condition E)
    When i am creating sales order for Jan month sales order
    condition A , B, C is considered and value of condition E comes perfectly in net value column of line item and in net value of sales header matches.
    But When i creating sales order for Feb month sales order header net value
    condition A , B, C, D is considered and value of condition E comes perfectly in net value column of line item and in net value of sales header does not match. In net value of header system is considering only Condition value C.
    So my query is why system is considering condition C value and why not the Net value of line item.
    My PP is as follow:
    Step          Cond.type      From       to       Man      Reg     St   subtotal      Req   Caltype  Bastype      
    10     A                    X       2     
    20     B                    X       2     
    30     C                    X       2         601
    40     D                    X       2     
    50     Net value     30     40          X        1
    60     E          50                 2         25            5
    70     Total           60     
    Please help me where is going wrong.
    Thanks & regards
    Sree

    Hi Sanjay
    Just go to V/06 and check wheather header data has been checked or not. That could be the reason it has not copied to header data
    Regards
    Srinath

  • How to find the original net value for a cancelled sales order

    Hi experts,
    From VA03 or table VBAP, net value for those cancelled items is always zero. Where to find those cancelled items' original net value?
    Thanks a lot.
    Yu

    Thanks Seshu,
    I just tried it as per your suggestion but I found for non-cancelled items konv-kbert is not equal to the net value taken from vbap-netwr.  So I wonder if knov-kbert is the right original net value for those cancelled items.
    Yu

  • Net value in header level (sales order)

    hi ,
             I am creating a sales oder. I have enterned the material in item level with some quantity but the net value of the order at header level is not updating .. y????  help me please.

    HI,
    you can use following step to tace it:
    1. go to header level "conditions" tab page & go for analysis there. you can get the results where & which value its picking there.
    2. if its more then 1 line item at item level system will through the consoilidated vale at the header level not for a single line item.
    Try this hope this will help u..Revert me if not solved...
    Regards
    Deepak

Maybe you are looking for

  • Upon start I get a blue screen with B817977E

    HP Photosmart C8180-all in one. I use a Mac Pro laptop. I updated the driver 4 years ago to my Mac.  This year while in Fl I went to turn on the printer and I get a blue screen with the number B817988E on the screen. I haver tried re booting by unplu

  • Page Layout Editor Problem

    Hello everybody, i want to arrange content in a page. The question is how? A How-to-document i downloaded from SAP says you can just drag&drop the content. This does not work for me. I can highlight the content but i cant move it anywhere. Im on EP 6

  • Update 1 or patches?

    I am confused about the fact that Sun released a whole new product version termed "update 1" while new patches for Forte C++ are being released. I could not find any indication which (if any) patches are incorporated into this "update 1" release. The

  • Language after phone firmware update

    Hi, I have a Nokia 6233 (product code:0538465), purchased in Slovenia and ofcourse it has slovenian language. The reason why I wish to update my phone is, because it restarts really often when I am using the internet. My main concerne is now: Will I

  • Airport Card failure after upgrade to OSX 10.5.6

    My airport suddenly down after upgrade to OSX 10.5.6. It showing "airport card not installed". I work very well in the past 8 moths before upgarde Any one has same problem ? How can I re-install the Airport card (DIY) Great thanks My Macbook is late