Netbean 5.5.1 + VWP is too slow when big project.

I have a project contains around 180(up) pages.
This project is upgraded from Createor2 to Netbeans 5.5.1+VWP.
In Creator2, It's very hard to maintain this project, waste much time in waiting.
I heard many people say VWP is better then Creator2.
In VWP, A simple project show a better performance then Creator2.
But, after upgrade, In my Project in VWP.
Open any first page cost me 5~10 min.
And, rename any component's Id in any time,cost me 2~5 min.
It's no different between VWP and Creator2 for me.
Is there any solutions can make VWP more fast?.
My Environment is
Pentium 1.73G
2G ram and set max Heap to 1024m

Since your question is about NetBeans, you would get more response from the nbusers mailing list. You can join at http://www.netbeans.org/community/index.html, and you can browse nbusers archives at http://www.nabble.com/Netbeans---Users-f2605.html.
For NetBeans performance recommendations, see the FAQs at http://wiki.netbeans.org/wiki/view/NetBeansUserFAQ#section-NetBeansUserFAQ-Performance
There are known performance issues, and a special team is working to resolve the issues. See http://wiki.netbeans.org/wiki/view/VW_PerformanceTigerTeam
I understand you've already migrated your project to Netbeans 5.5.1+VWP, so migration assistance may not be helpful. Just in case, see the offer at http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5185071

Similar Messages

Mac working too slow when switch to one to another user acconut

Mac working too slow when switch to one to another user acconut...
it means when working on one user acconut and i switch to another account its take too much loading + slower than 10.8
solve it..
Thanks

iTunes will naturally stop playing since it acknowledges that you're not actively using your current account.

Response time too slow when there is competition in the same connector PCo

Dear all, I'm having a problem with using PCo 2.1.
I created all the conections in PCo with OSIsoft PI and when I create a TagQuery
on MII to get the values of a tag is not occur problem in response time.
But when I have another TagQuery or Transaction, which is collecting data at the same
time, sharing the same connector, the time response is very slow.
Using the UDS this problem does not happen.
So problem is that when there is competition in the same connector, the response time is extremely slow.
Has anyone experienced this?
Regards!

Hi Udayan,
Thanks again for attention,
I found this problem on the two MII versions, 12.0 and 12.1.
The UDS and PCo are on different servers and using different ports too.
I didn't find errors on netweaver about this, but I'll verify one more time.
On true, on version 12.0 of MII there is two connections with PI, one PCo and another UDS, that are using the same port. But this does not happen on the MII version 12.1, there I'm using different ports.
Thank you very much!

How slow is too slow when copying files?

Hi.
First of all I want to apologize if I posted this in the wrong section of the forum.
My question simply related to the speed of copying files from a mac to another computer/FireWire Drive/USB Drive etc...
I realize that depending on the medium you are accessing/writing/copying speeds will vary. But lately I have been getting the general impression that my MacBook has been getting slower at any rate with any of the above combinations. Two weeks ago I reinstalled OS X Tiger (erase&install) just to clean house, and since then I have been doing more copying back and forth than ever. So I am just curious if there is a way to measure or benchmark the actual copying speed (unlike benchmarking apps that send their own little packages) or settings I should be aware of to speed up the process a little.
Thanks in advance!

I have copied large amounts of files repeatedly and I always get the same time associated by clock. 150 gig of files with FW 400 70 minutes. FW 800 50 minutes. USB forget it takes too long.

Ipod too slow when reading video files via DVD player with USB port.

Hi all, this is my first message in this forum.
I've got a DVD player that has a USB port and reads all types of disks. When I use my IPOD 80 GB the files I read are somehow frozen and don't run properly (lack of sync between audio and video, etc). I've got version 1.2.1 and use it in disk mode otherwise the player doesn’t see it. Meanwhile a friend of mine uses it's 60 Gb IPO on the same player, version 1.0 and it doesn't need to go to disk mode, and the player reads perfect from it. Is this a problem of the ipod software version?
Both ipods are in Fat32 format, but in his ipod the partition is set to active. I can't change mine to that, because windows is seeing my IPOD as a removable device, and my friend’s IPOD as a disk.
Hope I haven't been too confusing, and I welcome any help anyone can give.
Thanks.

Sorry, but I don't even know
what it is you are trying to do. Are you attaching
the iPod to a stand alone DVD player? Are you trying
to export stuff out of the iPod into the DVD player?
Patrick
Hi, I'm attaching the iPod to a stand alone DVD player, that has a usb input port. And then read video files from it.

Videos taken with my iPhone 5 play back fine on my phone, but are too slow when imported to my PC. Everything seems updated. HELP!!

When I take a video with my iPhone 5, it plays back great on my phone. However, when I upload to my computer it plays back extremely slow, or the image freezes while the audio keeps going. I've tried Windows Media Player, Quicktime, VLC media player, and they are all updated. So is my computer software. I never had this problem with my previous iPhone 3Gs. This is very annoying, help!!

SharmFarm wrote:
Good ev Ning Mario49 firstly I would like to say a great thank you for your attention to trying to help me,,,,, i have looked at the links and will try everything stated first thing…
Hi Mario,,,,
I tried everything in your reply,,, thank you again,, I had done that once before and all was working great,,
I have just now tried the Reinstall via iTunes, about 20 into the download, the iTunes logo on the phone disappeared, and the Apple Logo appeared again,,, I waited until the iTunes stated that the download had finished, and the install was in progress,,,
Nothing happened, still the Apple Logo was visual on the screen, iTunes never recognised the phone which it was on my iTunes account previously,,,
Still just a bunch of lines, maybe 5 or 6 so small writing,, I personally can not read what it is telling me, someone said it reads, incorrect shutdown,,,????????
Please advise,???
I am now at a loss,,, I really became excited when I saw the iTunes icon after putting the phone into restore,,,???
Thank you again
D

NICard 6031E Acquisition too slow when synchronisation with ATMEGA128

Hello:
I have an NI Card 6031E acquiring in HARDWARE SAMPLE CLOCK timing mode which means I supply a clock from an ATMEGA128 and the card acquires a value after each CLOCK high from another ASIC (Multiplexer chip).
The clock comes from a microcontroller ATMEGA128.
PROBLEM: I send an ' r ' character to the ATMEGA128 and subsequently I call the SAMPLE CLOCK timing read function in my user interface Visual C++ 6.0 on the PC. I am trying to synchronise PC with ATMEGA and NICARD data read, BUT I CANT DO IT.
The thing is when the ' r ' char is received at the ATMEGA128 this one does what it has to do just ONCE and may be does it too fast for the NICARD to read the values supplied by the CLOCK from the ATMEGA128.
The ATMEGA128 supplies a few digital binary signals (0 or 1) to the ASIC and the ASIC having received that particular sequence or digital waveform it sends the data (128 values one after each CLOCK high) to the NICARD.
Therefore, each CLOCK high delivers a value to the NICARD from the ASIC. The problem is that it seems I loose the data on the NICARD because the sequence is done very fast at the ATMEGA128 and the NICARD takes 480us I think to perform an instruction. I tried placing the READ function before sending the r char but it blocks.
I need SYNCHRONISATION between the NICARD acquiring values and the ATMEGA128 sending the clock and the ASIC sending data. Can I use other CHARS. I am lost! HELP! -)
Thanks,
Javi

The ATMEGA128 code structure and CLOCK signal is as such:
1 - FOR loop, therefore repeats itself always until you come out of the program execution.
INSIDE FOR LOOP:
2 - wait 1 microsecond, CLOCK HIGH, wait 1 micro second and CLOCK LOW
3 - wait 26.4 microseconds, another FOR loop and inside it, (128 times CLOCK HIGH, wait 1 micro second and CLOCK LOW, and wait 26.4 micro seconds).
4 - Once finished program goes back to 1
So therefore the frequency of the CLOCK is of 37878.78 Hz or 37878.78 HIGH CLOCKS or samples per second which comes from 1/26.4microseconds.
However, the initial first CLOCK on the FOR loop starting in section 1 is HIGH after 1 microsecond as described in section 2.
The sampling frequency is set at 50000 samples per second on the NICARD, so therefore it is a sufficient setting for a 37878.78 Hz CLOCK.
I acquire the data via an NICARD and my code sends an "r" character from the VISUAL C++ user interface to the ATMEGA128 and when the ATMEGA128 receives the "r" char it SENDS the CLOCK (and relevant waveform) to an ASIC. Then when the NICARD receives the CLOCK it acquires 1 sample on every CLOCK HIGH.
I noticed a few days ago that when I start the CLOCK from the ATMEGA (same as sending an "r" char to the ATMEGA) on another Visual C++ application without the NICARD acquisition software functions and at the same time I start the Visual c++ application with the NICARD functions, I get almost the correct data.
It seems that separating both Visual C++ applications PARTIALLY works but it does not make much sense.
The difference between both is just having the NICARD functions present or not present, it seems, although it could be something else too.
As you can see the synchronisation between the NICARD (HARDWARE TIMING CLOCK) data acquisition and the ATMEGA128 or ASIC sending data is performed via the sending of the "r" char to the ATMEGA128.
Thanks.
Javi.

Submit Program - Copy works too slow when selecting XMLP program

Hi
Whenever I try to submit new concurrent program using copy button, if i select xmlp program, it almost kills the instance and takes lot of time ( at least 4-5 mins) before populating parameters etc whereas for non XMLP programs, it populates instantly. I did some RnD and found that the moment layout is linked to conc program, copying becomes slow.
Is it problem only I am observing or it is a general issue? I have tried this on 4-5 different instances and everywhere having same problem.
Regards
Varun

First of all i would like to thank you for all your answers!
I tryed all the sollution you proposed but nothing has really changed it speed.
1° The loops are not running in parallel, would it be faster if they were ? how do i make them run in parallel ?
2° the sequence structure was indeed reduntant, everything work nicely even without it!
3° closing the Visa sources after the loop doesn't make the program executes faster..
4° 3 seperate loops instead of one doesn't make a huge difference ...
5° Waits/Delays doesn't make the system faster (or maybe i didn't know how to use it propoerly!)
6° What do you mean by "convert the Express vi's to DAQmx code and work from there" ??
i have no ideas how i'll solve this problem, any comment or remark are very welcom !
Thank you again for your help!
Yanis

IMovie too slow when using with iPhoto videos

Dear Geniuses
I do have several videos into iPhoto, many of them ... and using iMovie to edit video is INCREDIBLY slow ...
The only "solution" is to move the iPhoto videos into iMovie?
Any ideas if iMovie 10 or 11 or 12 will be better at this?
Is Aperture or Final Cut Pro X an alternative solution?
tx in advance

Hi Beppe,
Your issue is related to Windows Embedded. Please post thread on the following forum for more effective response.
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home?category=embeddedwindows.
Thanks.
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Qosmio G30-153 Too slow when installing

Hello people,
My Qosmio G30-153 is taking too long to install normal software/programs. For instance, it took me more than 3 hours to install Office XP! - It's ridiculous. Also it stucks at the first 4 "bars" when I try to install Macromedia Dreamweaver 8. It stucks on the "Copying new files". Please what can I do to fix this problem? - Does anyone has this sort of a problem?
Should I send it for service?
Right now I'm installing dreamweaver 8 and it's installing it 9 hours now. It's at the half process. It's WAY too fraustrating! Does anyone know how to fix this?
Message was edited by: Vasilias

Hi Vasilias
Thats unbelievable! You need 9 hours to install a simple web design application!
This is very strange and I would firstly say there must be a hardware malfunction
But did you install any 3rd applications? How about the CPU usage?? Open the task manager and check if there are any strange background processes running on the notebook
Did you check the system for some malware software?
Did you defragment the HDD? Please start also the "chkdsk" for HDD checking

JDeveloper is becoming too slow when you work with web services

Hi,
I am trying to write some web services code but after generating the Java classes from the WSDL the IDE becomes extremely slow.
I need to wait 5-10 seconds each time while writing a word in Java editor. I tried to disable auto suggest and all the fancy things like that but could not make it faster.
Any suggestions ?
I am using JDeveloper 11g r1p1.
Thanks

Hi,
I don't have any backing bean for this project. I am implementing a web service by using a WSDL. I guess the problem is JDeveloper can't handle having so many Java files .
When I generate the Java classes from the WSDL I end up having hundreds of Java classes and some are a little long. Looks like it is the same behavior that you mentioned about having big backing bean classes..
For now I am using IntelliJ Idea for editing the Java code and I use JDeveloper for running only. Idea doesn't bother having that many Java files and works as it supposed to work.
Thanks

Windows Server 2012 R2 RDP access too slow when user access

HI Team,
Recently installed Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard edition .
The above server also promoted as Domain controller.
I am trying to access the server VIA RDP from Windows 8 client machine access is toll slow and welcome screen shows for 2 to 3 minutes then only i can able to see my server desktop.
Please advise me.

We have two applications published on Rdweb.
1. MS
Paint
2. Remote
Desktop with option /v: <fqdn of the terminal server itself>
MS Paint – can see local drives when logged on to the paint application
Remote Desktop with parameters /v: <fqdn of the terminal server itself> - cannot see local drives when logged onto the full desktop view
Mahesh

Indesign slow when opening projects.

We currently have 3 people working with indesign from mac and 1 person working from indesign on windows 7 machine. There are no issues with the mac side of things, but when we open an indesign file on the windows machine it takes 7 to 15min to open the file. To further help with this question the files are located on the network internally. Any help would be much apprecatied!
Thanks,
Joe

Waht happens with a new file you create onthe PC, close, and reopen?
How about in a new user account?

My EBS is too slow on windows 7

My ebs is too slow when i use it on windows 7 but on older version on windows is working fine.
Could somebody know what is the issue or how can we solve it?
Thanks

My ebs is too slow when i use it on windows 7 but on older version on windows is working fine.This is a client issue and not an Application/Database issue.
Do you meet all the requirements in these docs?
Recommended Browsers for Oracle E-Business Suite 11i (Doc ID 285218.1)
Recommended Browsers for Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12 (Doc ID 389422.1)
Could somebody know what is the issue or how can we solve it?Please see these docs.
Oracle E-Business Suite 11i and 12 PC Client Performance [ID 557259.1]
Tuning performance on eBusiness suite [ID 744143.1]
A Holistic Approach to Performance Tuning Oracle Applications Systems [ID 69565.1]
Thanks,
Hussein

ACE Load balancing web page hosted by Microsoft CMS reponding too slow

My pages hosted by an CMS (content managment server), open too slow when passing trought the ace. Any ideas?
Regard's,
Miguel Amaral

2 GB is the minimum memory configuration to run Yosemite at all. Given that limitation you will constantly need to be mindful of the programs you're running.
ESET will only place additional demands on that Mac's limited system resources. Uninstall it. It is capable of nothing beneficial and your Mac cannot operate properly with it installed.
Back up your Mac prior to making any changes to its file system. To learn how to use Time Machine read Mac Basics: Time Machine backs up your Mac - Apple Support.
ESET offers no obvious way to uninstall it. To do that you must use the "Eset Cyber Security Pro Setup Wizard" included with its installation package.
Use the Uninstall icon:
Disregard the blatantly fraudulent "Warning!" that appears:
Lie about the reason in the following step, which cannot be bypassed. ESET's developer is disingenuous and expects the same of its users:
ESET's uninstaller leaves components behind but it is sufficiently effective to render this piece of trash inert.

Netbean 5.5.1 + VWP is too slow when big project.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for