NETLOAD Aabout Load balancing algorithm

now a MP model ubb:
*MACHINES
site1
NETLOAD=1000
site1
NETLOAD=100
*GROUPS
GROUP1 LMID=site1
GROUP2 LMID=site2
*SERVERS
svr1 GRPNO=GROUP1
svr2 GRPNO=GROUP2
now,for example
site1 LOAD=500
site2 LOAD=300
if a request is sent from site1 to svr2 on site2,now how much load in site1 and
site2?
the answer is true:site1 LOAD=1500,site2 LOAD=1300?

Hello!
Found this post while searching information about RFC and Logon Groups...
I have some mess in my head with SMLG functionality and RZ12. As I know SMLG we can use to distribute users to application server instances, it gives us good achievement in performance. With RZ12 we can distribute RFC connection of particular job for parallel execution on predefined application server. With SMQS and SMQR transaction we can set "Name of AS Group" to route RFC-execution on certain server or servers. But I have troubles with understanding. Imagine, we set up group 1 with 2 servers (name it RFC_GR1), and group 2 with another 2 servers (name it RFC_GR2). How could qRFC scheduler decide on which RFC server group (RFC_GR1 or RFC_GR2) distribute RFC-execution? How to interact "Name of AS Group" with RFC groups if we can set only one group? How could we distribute RFC-execution depending on our logon groups (smlg)? We would like to distribute RFC depending on SAP logon groups. Is it possible? Or do I compare apple and orange?
Regards,
Artem Ivashkin

Similar Messages

ESXi 4.1 NIC Teaming's Load-Balancing Algorithm,Nexus 7000 and UCS

Hi, Cisco Gurus:
Please help me in answering the following questions (UCSM 1.4(xx), 2 UCS 6140XP, 2 Nexus 7000, M81KR in B200-M2, No Nexus 1000V, using VMware Distributed Switch:
Q1. For me to configure vPC on a pair of Nexus 7000, do I have to connect Ethernet Uplink from each Cisco Fabric Interconnect to the 2 Nexus 7000 in a bow-tie fashion? If I connect, say 2 10G ports from Fabric Interconnect 1 to 1 Nexus 7000 and similar connection from FInterconnect 2 to the other Nexus 7000, in this case can I still configure vPC or is it a validated design? If it is, what is the pro and con versus having 2 connections from each FInterconnect to 2 separate Nexus 7000?
Q2. If vPC is to be configured in Nexus 7000, is it COMPULSORY to configure Port Channel for the 2 Fabric Interconnects using UCSM? I believe it is not. But what is the pro and con of HAVING NO Port Channel within UCS versus HAVING Port Channel when vPC is concerned?
Q3. if vPC is to be configured in Nexus 7000, I understand there is a limitation on confining to ONLY 1 vSphere NIC Teaming's Load-Balancing Algorithm i.e. Route Based on IP Hash. Is it correct?
Again, what is the pro and con here with regard to application behaviours when Layer 2 or 3 is concerned? Or what is the BEST PRACTICES?
I would really appreciate if someone can help me clear these lingering doubts of mine.
God Bless.
SiM

Sim,
Here are my thoughts without a 1000v in place,
Q1. For me to configure vPC on a pair of Nexus 7000, do I have to connect Ethernet Uplink from each Cisco Fabric Interconnect to the 2 Nexus 7000 in a bow-tie fashion? If I connect, say 2 10G ports from Fabric Interconnect 1 to 1 Nexus 7000 and similar connection from FInterconnect 2 to the other Nexus 7000, in this case can I still configure vPC or is it a validated design? If it is, what is the pro and con versus having 2 connections from each FInterconnect to 2 separate Nexus 7000? //Yes, for vPC to UCS the best practice is to bowtie uplink to (2) 7K or 5Ks.
Q2. If vPC is to be configured in Nexus 7000, is it COMPULSORY to configure Port Channel for the 2 Fabric Interconnects using UCSM? I believe it is not. But what is the pro and con of HAVING NO Port Channel within UCS versus HAVING Port Channel when vPC is concerned? //The port channel will be configured on both the UCSM and the 7K. The pro of a port channel would be both bandwidth and redundancy. vPC would be prefered.
Q3. if vPC is to be configured in Nexus 7000, I understand there is a limitation on confining to ONLY 1 vSphere NIC Teaming's Load-Balancing Algorithm i.e. Route Based on IP Hash. Is it correct? //Without the 1000v, I always tend to leave to dvSwitch load balence behavior at the default of "route by portID".
Again, what is the pro and con here with regard to application behaviours when Layer 2 or 3 is concerned? Or what is the BEST PRACTICES? UCS can perform L2 but Northbound should be performing L3.
Cheers,
David Jarzynka

ACE Load Balancing algorithm

Team,
I was reading Designing Content Switching Solutions last night. I came across a page that suggested Round Robin for HTTP connections, Least Conns for FTP connections, dst Hash for caching connections and so on.
Could someone please provide information or a link on which load balancing algorithm to use based on the application, is there some form of best practice for this?
Thank you,
John...

John,
there is no best practices.
It depends on your applications and needs.
For example, for caching, some people prefer to optimize the disk space, and other the response time.
So, if you do destination hash, you guarantee that all traffic for one site is always handled by the same cache.
Therefore you optimize the disk space since you will not find the same object on all caches.
BUT if one site attracts a lot of connections, the cache device that handles that site will be overloaded (for example youtube.com)
Leastconn is a good option in theory.
The device that has less connections should receive the next one.
The problem is if you have flapping links or servers crashing or if you do a lot of maintenance and add/remove servers frequently.
This confuses the algorithm and is the source of a lot of bugs.
My recommendation is to go with roundrobin unless you have identify that you really need another algorithm.
And you can always start with roundrobin and see what happens...
Gilles.

Hyper-V NIC Team Load Balancing Algorithm: TranportPorts vs Hyper-VPorts

Hi,
I'm going to need to configure a NIC team for the LAN traffic for a Hyper-V 2012 R2 environment. What is the recommended load balancing algorithm?
Some background:
- The NIC team will deal with LAN traffic (NOT iSCSI storage traffic)
- I'll set up a converged network. So there'll be a virtual switch on top of this team, which will have vNICs configured for each cluster, live migration and management
- I'll implement QOS at the virtual switch level (using option -DefaultFlowMinimumBandwidthWeight) and at the vNIC level (using option -MinimumBandwidthWeight)
- The CSV is set up on an Equallogics cluster. I know that this team is for the LAN so it has nothing to do with the SAN, but this reference will become clear in the next paragraph.
Here's where it gets a little confusing. I've checked some of the Equallogics documentation to ensure this environment complies with their requirements as far as storage networking is concerned. However, as part of their presentation the Dell publication
TR1098-4, recommends creating the LAN NIC team with the TrasportPorts Load Balancing Algorithm. However, in some of the Microsoft resources (i.e. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn550728.aspx), the recommended load balancing algorithm is HyperVPorts.
Just to add to the confusion, in this Microsoft TechEd presentation, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ed7HThAvp7o, the recommendation (at around minute 8:06) is to use dynamic ports algorithm mode. So obviously there are many ways to do this, but which one is
correct? I spoke with Equallogics support and the rep said that their documentation recommends TransportPorts LB algorithm because that's what they've tested and works. I'm wondering what the response from a Hyper-V expert would be to this question. Anyway,
any input on this last point would be appreciated.

Gleb,
>>See Windows Server 2012 R2 NIC Teaming (LBFO) Deployment and Management for more
info
Thanks for this reference. It seems that I have an older version of this document where there's absolutely
no mention of the dynamic LBA. Hence my confusion when in the Microsoft TechEd presentation the
recommendation was to use Dynamic. I almost implemented this environment with switch dependent and Address Hash Distribution because, based on the older version of the document, this combination offered:
a) Native teaming for maximum performance and switch diversity is not required; or
b) Teaming under the Hyper-V switch when an individual VM needs to be able to transmit at rates in excess of what one team member can deliver
The new version of the document recommends Dynamic over the other two LBA. The analogy that the document
makes of TCP flows with human speech was really helpful for me to understand what this algorithm is doing. For those who will never read the document, I'm referring to this:
"The outbound loads in this mode are dynamically balanced based on the concept of
flowlets. Just as human speech has natural breaks at the ends of words and sentences, TCP flows (TCP communication streams) also have naturally
occurring breaks. The portion of a TCP flow between two such breaks is referred to as a flowlet. When the dynamic mode algorithm detects that a flowlet boundary has been encountered, i.e., a break of sufficient length has occurred in the TCP flow,
the algorithm will opportunistically rebalance the flow to another team member if apropriate. The algorithm may also periodically rebalance flows that do not contain any flowlets if circumstances require it. As a result the affinity
between TCP flow and team member can change at any time as the dynamic balancing algorithm works to balance the workload of the team members. "
Anyway, this post made my week. You sir are deserving of a beer!

Load balancing algorithm for groups in RZ12

Hello,
I would like to know the load balancing algorithm for groups defined in RZ12.
I know that log on groups for external connections are administered via SMLG and table RZLLICLASS.
I also know that RFC resources can be managed for RFC logon groups via RZ12.
Kind regards,
Peter
<removed_by_moderator>
Point awarding is at your discretion, but read and follow the "Rules of Engagement"
Edited by: Juan Reyes on Dec 3, 2010 10:21 AM

Hello!
Found this post while searching information about RFC and Logon Groups...
I have some mess in my head with SMLG functionality and RZ12. As I know SMLG we can use to distribute users to application server instances, it gives us good achievement in performance. With RZ12 we can distribute RFC connection of particular job for parallel execution on predefined application server. With SMQS and SMQR transaction we can set "Name of AS Group" to route RFC-execution on certain server or servers. But I have troubles with understanding. Imagine, we set up group 1 with 2 servers (name it RFC_GR1), and group 2 with another 2 servers (name it RFC_GR2). How could qRFC scheduler decide on which RFC server group (RFC_GR1 or RFC_GR2) distribute RFC-execution? How to interact "Name of AS Group" with RFC groups if we can set only one group? How could we distribute RFC-execution depending on our logon groups (smlg)? We would like to distribute RFC depending on SAP logon groups. Is it possible? Or do I compare apple and orange?
Regards,
Artem Ivashkin

Port Channel Load-Balancing Algorithm (North Bound)

I'm trying to figure out what the load balancing algorithm for the 6100 and 6200 FIs for the Northbound connections. I can't find any documentation on how to change it.
The Nexus 7000s use an 8-bit hash, making it very easy to do something other than 2, 4, or 8 link port channel and get even (at least algorithmically) distribution.
Catalyst switches (not sure about Sup2T though) would use a 1, 2, or 3-bit index, which would skew traffic algorthmically if you used a non-power of 2.
Looking at the 5K documentation, it seems to use the Catalyst style (though haven't been able to confirm). My guess is that whatever is used for the 5Ks is used for the 6100/6200.
Design wise, this would mean you would want to use powers of 2 for your NB uplinks.

Hello Tony,
On UCS FI, it uses " sr-cdest-ip " as the load balancing algorithm and uses 8 parameters for hashing
6248-01-B(nxos)# sh port-channel load-balance
Port Channel Load-Balancing Configuration:
System: source-dest-ip
Port Channel Load-Balancing Addresses Used Per-Protocol:
Non-IP: source-dest-mac
IP: source-dest-ip source-dest-mac
6248-01-B(nxos)# show platform fwm info pc port-channel 1
dump pc info: if_index 369098752 dump_all 0 verbose 1
Po1: state 0x0 #pifs 1 fwimpd ctx 0x9666c1c
Po1: hash params - l2_da 1 l2_sa 1 l3_da 1 l3_sa 1
Po1: hash params - l4_da 1 l4_sa 1 xor_sa_da 1 hash_elect 1
I could not find an option to change these values.
Padma

SG300-28: LAG Load Balance Algorithm

The SG300-28 LAG Load Balance Algorithm options are:
MAC Address
IP/MAC Address
This switch is connected to two ESXi hosts running version 5.5 each with quad port 1 gbit nic.
These ESXI hosts supports > 20 algorithms.
Is there in a upcoming firmware for the SG300-28 supporting more algorithms?

The SG300-28 LAG Load Balance Algorithm options are:
MAC Address
IP/MAC Address
This switch is connected to two ESXi hosts running version 5.5 each with quad port 1 gbit nic.
These ESXI hosts supports > 20 algorithms.
Is there in a upcoming firmware for the SG300-28 supporting more algorithms?

Load balancing algorithms

hello
can any one give URL about load balancing algorithms in 11500 series?
sincerally

Hi,
Here is a link.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/webscale/css/css_730/contlbgd/contrule.htm#1038118
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Sagar

Load-balancing Algorithm for NX-OS Port Channels

Hi, all
I do not understand description of port-channel load-balance ethernet command.
switch(config)# port-channel load-balance ethernet ?
destination-ip         Destination IP address
destination-mac        Destination MAC address
destination-port       Destination TCP/UDP port
source-dest-ip         Source & Destination IP address (includes l2)
source-dest-ip-only    Source & Destination IP addresses only
source-dest-mac        Source & Destination MAC address
source-dest-port       Source & Destination TCP/UDP port (includes l2 and l3)
source-dest-port-only Source & Destination TCP/UDP port only
source-ip              Source IP address
source-mac             Source MAC address
source-port            Source TCP/UDP port
Please tell me what the following descriptions mean.
Source & Destination IP address (includes l2)
Source & Destination TCP/UDP port (includes l2 and l3)
What are the meaning of "includes l2" and "includes l2 and l3" ?
Thank you for your cooperation in advance.

Hi Satoru,
On the Nexus 5000/6000 platforms, all FEXs will inherit the global hashing algorithm from the parent device.
On the Nexus 7000 platform, hashing algorithms can be assigned on a per FEX basis (all load balancing changes must be made from the Admin VDC):
N7K-A(config)# port-channel load-balance src-dst ip-l4port fex 134
Any FEX without a hashing algorithm configured with inherit the global hash. Making changes to the modular/global hash will not alter FEX specific hashing algorithms.
To verify the configuration applied you can use this command:
N5K_A# show port-channel load-balance
On the Nexus 7000, the per FEX algorithm can be checked by appending the ‘fex <#>’ to the end of the command in the Admin VDC or the FEX’s respective VDC:
N7K-A(config)# show port-channel load-balance fex 134
Regards,
Richard

Mod_weblogic and load balancing algorithm

Hi,
we have a problem where we have 2 boxes, each with Apache (doing some header and url rewrites) and configured with mod_weblogic, and weblogic servers with our stateless applications.
We have a HW loadbalancer in front, doing round-robin balancing, and we would like to configure load balancing feature in the Apaches so that each Apache always tries the request to the weblogic located in the same box, and only if that fails, try to the weblogic in the other box.
We also have a web applications with sessions, so we would like balancing feature for sticky sessions to apply.
Can somebody help?

The loadbalancing section in this post (http://middlewaremagic.com/weblogic/?p=7819) might help you
You can configure the weblogic module by using, for example,
LoadModule weblogic_module   "${ORACLE_HOME}/ohs/modules/mod_wl_ohs.so"
<IfModule weblogic_module>
     ConnectTimeoutSecs 10
     ConnectRetrySecs 2
     DebugConfigInfo ON
     WLSocketTimeoutSecs 2
     WLIOTimeoutSecs 300
     Idempotent ON
     FileCaching ON
     KeepAliveSecs 20
     KeepAliveEnabled ON
     DynamicServerList ON
     WLProxySSL OFF
</IfModule>
<Location /b2bconsole>
     SetHandler weblogic-handler
     WebLogicCluster 192.168.1.66:8001,192.168.1.67:9001
</Location>
<Location /integration>
     SetHandler weblogic-handler
     WebLogicCluster 192.168.1.66:8001,192.168.1.67:9001
</Location>
<Location /soa-infra>
     SetHandler weblogic-handler
     WebLogicCluster 192.168.1.66:8001,192.168.1.67:9001
</Location>

Load balancing algorithm problems with servlets

All,
We have a simple servlet which looks up an RMI object from JNDI and invokes
one of its methods in a loop. The RMI object is the HelloClusterImpl
example provided by WebLogic. The servlet basically copies the code from
the HelloClusterClient. In the cluster property file, our load algorithm is
setup to be round-robin. We are using IIS as our web server. If we start
up both servers in the cluster and then use another machine as our client to
call the HelloClusterClient, we see that the calls to HelloClusterImpl
alternate between the two clustered servers. In fact, it is done perfectly
at 50% for each server. When we run the servlet from with the client's
browser, however, it seems as if which ever server in the cluster that
receives the servlet request then takes 100% of the calls to
HelloClusterImpl and there is never any alternating. Although we can verify
that different servers in the cluster receive the servlet request, it seems
as if there is never any altering between the servers during the method
invocations on the HelloClusterImpl servant. Does this seem right?
Shouldn't there be alternating between the servers? Any help would be
greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
-Jon

I have to try this and I will let you.
Thanks
Jon Eagles wrote:
All,
We have a simple servlet which looks up an RMI object from JNDI and invokes
one of its methods in a loop. The RMI object is the HelloClusterImpl
example provided by WebLogic. The servlet basically copies the code from
the HelloClusterClient. In the cluster property file, our load algorithm is
setup to be round-robin. We are using IIS as our web server. If we start
up both servers in the cluster and then use another machine as our client to
call the HelloClusterClient, we see that the calls to HelloClusterImpl
alternate between the two clustered servers. In fact, it is done perfectly
at 50% for each server. When we run the servlet from with the client's
browser, however, it seems as if which ever server in the cluster that
receives the servlet request then takes 100% of the calls to
HelloClusterImpl and there is never any alternating. Although we can verify
that different servers in the cluster receive the servlet request, it seems
as if there is never any altering between the servers during the method
invocations on the HelloClusterImpl servant. Does this seem right?
Shouldn't there be alternating between the servers? Any help would be
greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
-Jon

CSS load balancing, service dependancy condition check

Hi,
I would like to seek some advice regarding the CSS's service configuration.
Is there a way to configure the CSS such that it check for the condition/status of a independant service (not involved in the load balancing algorithm) is alive/down (using service mode keepalive port/type), before deciding whether to/not to load balance to a group of services?
Senario is as follwows:
We process incoming HTTPS request and load balance to 2 HTTPS Servers (HTTPS service SSL1 and SSL2), on condition that a independent service (HTTPS service SSL3) is alive (using the keepalive type/port check in service mode).
If the independant service (HTTPS service SSL3) is not alive, remove the HTTPS Servers (HTTPS service SSL1 and SSL2) from the load balancing algorithm.
Thanks in advance for assistance
!************************** CIRCUIT **************************
circuit VLAN1
ip address 192.168.103.35 255.255.255.192
!************************** SERVICE **************************
service SSL1
ip address 192.168.103.53
protocol tcp
port 443
keepalive type tcp
keepalive port 443
active
service SSL2
ip address 192.168.103.54
protocol tcp
port 443
keepalive type tcp
keepalive port 443
active
? This is the service condition that CSS will check before deciding to/not to load balance to SSL1 and SSL2.
? If SSL3 is down, do not load balance to SSL1 and SSL2. If SSL3 is up, load balance to SSL1 and SSL2
service SSL3
ip address 192.168.103.55
protocol tcp
port 443
keepalive type tcp
keepalive port 443
active
!*************************** OWNER ***************************
owner CISCO
content L5Rule_SSL
vip address 192.168.103.37
application ssl
protocol tcp
port 443
url "/*"
add service SSL1
add service SSL2
active
!*************************** GROUP ***************************
group SSL
vip address 192.168.103.37
add destination service SSL1
add destination service SSL2
active

maybe this?
circuit VLAN1
ip address 192.168.103.35 255.255.255.192
ip virtual-router 10 priority 100
ip redundant-vip 10 192.168.103.37
ip critical-service 10 SSL3
if I'm not mistaken the vip 192.168.103.37 will stop working when the service SSL3 goes down. I'm not sure that this is what you want though...

Multiple dgraph clustering (load balancing) OOTB available?

Hello,
We have 2 dgraphs running in parallel having the same data to share the load of the clients.
I would like to know if there is any OOTB solution provided by Endeca where in these two dgraphs can share the load. OR I need to use an external load balancer for the same?
If there is any document that explains the configuration for OOTB Endeca solution, please let me know
Thanks!

Hi,
yes I know...
i tried to check if they were still available...but found none,
that's why I said if you want me to send them email me ...(I downloaded them from Eden ) and the files aren't too big
regards
Saleh
29/11/12 : copy of the document called Simple MDEX Load Balancing with Apache HTTP Server (Endeca)
Endeca Solution Article Simple MDEX Load Balancing with Apache HTTP Server
Endeca Solution Article
Simple MDEX Load Balancing with Apache HTTP Server
By Robert Dennis
Last Updated: December 2010
Endeca Product Versions: 5.0+
This document describes how to set up a simple load balancing and failover solution using Apache HTTP server. This provides a cost effective mechanism leveraging widely available open source technologies to address simple infrastructure needs. This document includes the following sections:
 Introduction
 Configuration Steps
 References
Endeca Solution Article Simple MDEX Load Balancing with Apache HTTP Server
Endeca Confidential 2 of 5
Introduction
Load balancers are the preferred solution for providing scalability, redundancy, and fail-over for MDEX Engine queries. Typically, load balancing and failover are accomplished with the use of dedicated load balancing hardware. For some Endeca implementations, however, a robust mechanism for load balancing may not be available or required by the customer. For more information on the basics of load balancing an Endeca application, see the “Endeca Load Balancing Best Practices” Solution Article available on EDeN.
This document describes the configuration steps involved in leveraging Apache’s default load balancing mechanisms to provide a simple load balancing solution for an Endeca application. In this scenario, Apache will sit between the Endeca presentation API housed in a web application and redundant MDEX engines. Apache performs the duties of a simple load balancer and failover broker, managing query requests from the application tier to specific MDEX engines.
Configuration Steps
The described configuration leverages Apache 2.2 HTTP Server as the load balancing mechanism between two identical MDEX engines all residing on a single server. The sample configuration expects the Apache HTTP server to be listening on port 5555 and the MDEX engines to be listening on ports 8000 and 8001. These can be changed as appropriate for a given environment.
1. In the Apache httpd.conf, enable the server for listening on port 5555.
Endeca Solution Article Simple MDEX Load Balancing with Apache HTTP Server
Endeca Confidential 3 of 5
2. Enable the following modules by un-commenting the appropriate loadmodule statements in the httpd.conf file. These modules include: mod_proxy, mod_proxy_balancer, mod_proxy_connect, mod_proxy_http, mod_negotiation.
3. Include the httpd-vhosts.conf file by un-commenting the appropriate line in the httpd.conf file.
4. Save the httpd.conf file and open the httpd-vhosts.conf file. Append the below information and save the file.
Endeca Solution Article Simple MDEX Load Balancing with Apache HTTP Server
Endeca Confidential 4 of 5
NameVirtualHost *:5555 <VirtualHost *:5555> ServerName localhost ProxyPass / balancer://dgraphs/ ProxyPassReverse / balancer://dgraphs/ <Proxy balancer://dgraphs> BalancerMember http://localhost:8000 loadfactor=1 retry=0 BalancerMember http://localhost:8001 loadfactor=1 retry=0 </Proxy> </VirtualHost> <Location /balancer-manager> SetHandler balancer-manager </Location>
The “retry” parameter associated with Balance Members disables the period of inactivity for a particular worker after Apache determines it is offline. The default is 60 seconds. It is recommended that this is set to a low number such as 0.
In environments where particular MDEX engines are targeted for additional load, the “loadfactor” parameter associated with Balance Members can be adjusted. Higher values ensure that the load balancing algorithm that is used will route the traffic load accordingly to specific Balance Members.
5. Restart Apache.
6. Within the UI application, configure the host and port of the HttpENEConnection to the host and port of the load balancer (e.g. localhost:5555).
Endeca Solution Article Simple MDEX Load Balancing with Apache HTTP Server
Endeca Confidential 5 of 5
Apache HTTP Server is now properly configured to serve as a load balancer for the MDEX Engines.
References
“Endeca Load Balancing Best Practices” Solution Article (EDeN)
Apache Module mod_proxy
Apache Module mod_proxy_balancer
Apache Module mod_proxy_connect
Apache Module mod_proxy_http
Apache Module mod_negotiation
Edited by: sabdelhalim on Nov 28, 2012 5:46 PM

Load balancing with intermediate Driver IM

Hello Everyone,
Im Completely Lost now, im pretty new to WDK and im trying to understand the best way to implement the following :
Problem : I want to send Traffic across multiple interfaces as per a loadblancing algorithm that i will make, its UnEqual Loadbalancing , So all of the traffic for example coming from my system (just say like vpn solution) will go through
the load balancing algorithm.
My Solutions which are not Right for sure !
Sol1. IM Driver Mux that will do 1-N , in here i have to create a protocol Driver as well and Attach my IM to the protocol and the minport on each interface i Want to use in my Load balancing .
How to tie all of the traffic on my system to have a next hop being my Load balancer , do i need a virtual miniport and change the routing table of my system as well ?
Sol2. Make a protocol Driver Attach it to the physical interfaces, then make a virtual miniport Adapter, Bind it to the protocol Drivers on many physical interfaces as i want, then implement the Load balancing by send specific traffic to
each protocol seperatly .
Making here the virtual miniport as the next hop of my system by modifying the routing table , then the virtual miniport will take care of the load balancing alogrithm !!
Finally ... Why Do I need to create a protocol Driver while the tcp/ipv4 protocol already installed on the system and present in our physical interfaces already is Enough for me ?? Can I bind to that protocol driver ?
What I described above is what my level of knowledge drove me into, your feedback will REALLY help understand and get out of he confusion .
Best Regards,

No its not a fail-over, my plan was to achieve an unequal-loadbalancing, so say i have 1 ethernet connected to the internet with 100mbps and another 4G usb adapter connected to the same PC, now i have 2 internet connetions on my PC with 2 adapters .the windows
is not going to use them both but actually use one and leave the other idle , i want my IM to use them both so all of the connections coming from my PC are going to be loadbalanced per connection "for now not per packet coz per packet wont work on the internet"
So if im doing a torrent download for example the download actual speed will use both connections in accounting .
Later level i will adjust the algorithm for testing purposes todo loadbalancing per packet and treat them in the other side before it get used .

Demonstrate Load Balancing

Hi All,
We are in the process of testing a new software load balancer on top of Oracle E Business Suite R12.1.3.
The configurations are done and from the load balancer software itself we can see the requests are forwarded to different application servers. (for testing the load balancing algorithm is set to round robin mode).
Is there are any way from the database I can show the count of connections from EBS that would get incremented with every new application session?
Thanks and Regards,
Ashok

You managed to award yourself the correct answer anyway
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

NETLOAD Aabout Load balancing algorithm

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for