NetStream.bytesTotal is much smaller than the video

I have a video player running online, which sends error messages when the player loops on movie complete.
I am listening to the NetStatusEvent NetStream.Play.Stop to know that the video has completed playing.
I have a video which is more than 2,000,000 bytes, and the NetStream.bytesTotal in the error range between 2,000 and 5,000 bytes.
It looks like the users with this error are using Flash Player 11.1 and Windows 7.

Well, it does not fit the port. When I had the TV installed, the guy told me I would need HDMI later, and he installed it connected and it has been hanging there unused.
The cord says HDMI on it and it looks like this:
http://www.howtogeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/image260.png
Can I use a converter like this?
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000FUVNX8/ref=ox_sc_act_title_3?ie=UTF8&m=A2XN AOBSW0CZDL
Do I also need a digital audio cord? (I do not know how I can plug it in because my TV is mounted to the wall and I don't even know if there is an output for it.)
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003C2YE7I/ref=ox_sc_act_title_2?ie=UTF8&m=A20H 555M9MROEP
Thanks for your help!

Similar Messages

Importing a high-definition clip produces a timeline much longer than the video

I have begun importing high-definition clips in MOV format into my Premier CS4. I use a hard-disk based video recorder ( a DTE technology FS-100) whichbreaks the video up into 2GB clips each with a duration of 2 minutes, 18 seconds. and 8 frames (2:18.8). However, Premier thinks that the clip is about 37 minutes long. When I play the clip in the editor, the video freezes and the sound stops at 2:18.8 with the remaining ~35 minutes showing the same frame.
I can get around this by manually cutting each clip down to 2:18.8, but I shouldn't have to do this. By the way, when I import standard definition video from the same recorder I don't have this problem; Premier determines the correct length of the clip.
Any ideas of what is going on and how to correct?
Thanks!

I thought it was a little odd though as you can re-time the clip through the properties menu of the clip and the audio links with it and slows down. I had jsut hoped the same would apply when I just tried using a smoother effect on it.
Thanks for your help anyway.

Why is the sparse bundle so much smaller than the backed up computer...can I be confident all files are backed up?

Hey gang,
iphoto folder became big so I have moved it to an external drive. I made sure the external disk is not excluded from timemachine backup in tm preferences. Backup seemed to take forever (it actually said "preparing for backup" the whole time with a spinning progress bar) ie 24 hours and still the same pogress bar.
i stopped the process as i had no confidence anything was actually happening
When i open up time machine, an earlier version of my imac is there, but the external drive is kind of greyed and i cannot access it.
When I check the sparse bundle size, it is under 200 gb, when my imac is around 600 gb, 900 with the external drive.
Why is the sparse bundle so small relative to the imac? are there hidden data files outside of the sparse bundle? when checking the preferences, it states total included is 921 gb...yet that is not reflected in the sparse bundle size.
I want to be sure iphoto is actually backed up before deleting it from my imac.
thanks anyone!

marten berkman wrote:
I am wondering whether the "processing" progress bar was due to the time capsule freeing up space for the additional data on the new external drive. When I cancelled it, available space on the tc incresed from 200 to 500 gb.
Yes, quite possibly. Especially on Leopard and Snow Leopard, that process on network backups is excruciatingly repetitive and slow. It's improved greatly in Lion and later, but still isn't exactly quick.
The backup complete, i checked the contents of the backed up version of the external drive, and the iphoto folder was the same size as original, so I have confidence that iphoto is backed up. Now I could delete the iphoto from the imac, freeing up tons of space.
Yay!
Still curious why the imac sparsebundle is only 160gb, while my macbook pro sparsebundle is about 700 gb...as though they are inversely named from the computers they back up.
Oh, I didn't realize you had two Macs backing-up to the TC. Which one is the external HD connected to?
Unless you've specifically excluded things, after the initial backup, the sparse bundle should be nearly the size of the data it's backing-up (TM does exclude some things like system work files, most caches and logs, and trash, so the backups are a few GBs smaller). As you do more backups, of course, it will grow.
So please clarify how much data is on each drive, Mac, and sparse bundle.
Also, the 2tb time capsule has 258 gb of 1.8 tb available....am I to suppose that there is hidden backup data not in the sparse bundles?
Sparse bundles are odd critters. They don't automatically shrink when things are deleted from them. Instead, the vacated space is used for new files until it's full, then it begins to grow again. Time Machine will "compact" them when necessary, to reclaim the empty space, but doesn't take the time to do it unless it's out of room.
You can do that manually if you want, per the pink box in Time Machine - Frequently Asked Question #12.
Message was edited by: Pondini

Why is the Log Area size much smaller than the log volume

I have been following up on an Early Watch report that has been generated for our production SCM 5.0 system running liveCache 7.6.02 Build 14. The alert says "The LOG volumes size in your system is too small. Recommendation: Configure LOG Volumes to at least 2 GB". There are two interesting things about this.
1) I have spent the last couple of days reading all the OSS Notes, and MaxDB documentation I could find, and this does not seem to be documented as a recommendation anywhere. Does this seem like a realistic recommendation without taking into account the level of change actifity?
2) There is a single log volume allocated with size 2,097,160 KB. In production LC10 and DBMGUI report this to be correct size under volume details, but only list the total log area size as 1,706,328 (81% of the volume size). We have a non-production environment with exactly the same size log volume, but it reports that the log area size is 2,032,008 KB (97% of the volume). What leads to these different amounts of wasted space, and is there any way of getting the database to start using it?
Thanks,
Mark

Hi Natalia,
I did read 869267, several times. It does not answer my questions which is why I posted here.
DBMGUI version = 7.6.00.25
DBMCLI commands for PL1 (Production)
> xinstinfo PL1
IndepData           : /sapdb/data
IndepPrograms       : /sapdb/programs
InstallationPath    : /sapdb/PL1/db
Kernelversion       : KERNEL    7.6.02   BUILD 014-123-152-175
Rundirectory        : /sapdb/data/wrk/PL1
> dbmcli -d PL1 -u control,control
dbmcli on PL1>db_state
OK
State
ONLINE
dbmcli on PL1>info log
OK
END
Name                            | Value
Log Mirrored                    = NO
Log Writing                     = ON
Log Automatic Overwrite         = OFF
Max. Size (KB)                  = 1706328
Backup Segment Size (KB)        = 699048
Used Size (KB)                  = 104640
Used Size (%)                   = 6
Not Saved (KB)                  = 104640
Not Saved (%)                   = 6
Log Since Last Data Backup (KB) = 0
Savepoints                      = 5210
Checkpoints                     = 0
Physical Reads                  = 2469115
Physical Writes                 = 15655616
Queue Size (KB)                 = 48000
Queue Overflows                 = 646
Group Commits                   = 98205
Waits for Logwriter             = 10957511
Max. Waits                      = 10
Average Waits                   = 0
OMS Log Used Pages              = 0
OMS Min. Free Pages             = 0
dbmcli on PL1>param_getvolsall
OK
LOG_MIRRORED                     NO
MAXLOGVOLUMES                    2
MAXDATAVOLUMES                   14
LOG_VOLUME_NAME_001              262145     F /sapdb/PL1/saplog/DISKL001
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0001            524289     F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0001
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0002            524289     F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0002
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0003            524289     F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0003
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0004            524289     F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0004
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0005            524289     F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0005
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0006            524289     F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0006
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0007            524289     F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0007
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0008            524289     F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0008
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0009            1048577    F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0009
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0010            1048577    F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0010
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0011            1048577    F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0011
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0012            1048577    F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0012
dbmcli on PL1>param_directget MAXCPU
OK
MAXCPU 12
dbmcli on PL1>param_directget MAX_LOG_QUEUE_COUNT
OK
MAX_LOG_QUEUE_COUNT     0
dbmcli on PL1>param_directget LOG_IO_QUEUE
OK
LOG_IO_QUEUE    6000
> xinstinfo SL1
IndepData           : /sapdb/data
IndepPrograms       : /sapdb/programs
InstallationPath    : /sapdb/SL1/db
Kernelversion       : KERNEL    7.6.02   BUILD 014-123-152-175
Rundirectory        : /sapdb/data/wrk/SL1
dbmcli on SL1>db_state
OK
State
ONLINE
dbmcli on SL1>info log
OK
END
Name                            | Value
Log Mirrored                    = NO
Log Writing                     = ON
Log Automatic Overwrite         = OFF
Max. Size (KB)                  = 2032008
Backup Segment Size (KB)        = 699048
Used Size (KB)                  = 3824
Used Size (%)                   = 0
Not Saved (KB)                  = 3824
Not Saved (%)                   = 0
Log Since Last Data Backup (KB) = 0
Savepoints                      = 1256
Checkpoints                     = 0
Physical Reads                  = 2178269
Physical Writes                 = 4969914
Queue Size (KB)                 = 16000
Queue Overflows                 = 21201
Group Commits                   = 643
Waits for Logwriter             = 751336
Max. Waits                      = 4
Average Waits                   = 0
OMS Log Used Pages              = 0
OMS Min. Free Pages             = 0
dbmcli on SL1>param_getvolsall
OK
LOG_MIRRORED                     NO
MAXLOGVOLUMES                    2
MAXDATAVOLUMES                   10
LOG_VOLUME_NAME_001              262145     F /sapdb/SL1/saplog/DISKL001
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0001            262145     F /sapdb/SL1/sapdata1/DISKD0001
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0002            262145     F /sapdb/SL1/sapdata2/DISKD0002
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0003            1048577    F /sapdb/SL1/sapdata3/DISKD0003
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0004            1048577    F /sapdb/SL1/sapdata4/DISKD0004
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0005            783501     F /sapdb/SL1/sapdata1/DISKD0005
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0006            783501     F /sapdb/SL1/sapdata2/DISKD0006
dbmcli on SL1>param_directget MAXCPU
OK
MAXCPU 4
dbmcli on SL1>param_directget MAX_LOG_QUEUE_COUNT
OK
MAX_LOG_QUEUE_COUNT     0
dbmcli on SL1>param_directget LOG_IO_QUEUE
OK
LOG_IO_QUEUE    2000
Thanks for the explaination of the reserved space for the Log Queue pages. This does explain why there is the difference between the two. I think we probably have our log segment size too large. As you can see we do get occasional log queue overflows. Do you suggest we increase the size of our log IO queue higher, and allocate more log volume space to compensate?
select * from SYSINFO.LOGSTATISTICS (on PL1)
1706328;334176;19;334176;19;1879;20305192;64109066;7806480;182151514;12;48000
DBMGUI Log Area Usage
Total Size: 2048.01 MB
Free Log Area: 1330.38 MB
Used Log Area: 335.96 MB
Unsaved Log Area: 335.96
Log since Last Data Backup: 0.00 MB
Thanks,
Mark

Forwarded images are much smaller than the original

Something new has happened. After 10 years of Mail I am just experiencing this phenomenon. When I forward an email with pictures or illustrations attached, the forwarded images are about 75% the size of the original. In many instances that takes the readability away. Does anyone have an idea how I can fix this or what causes it? Thanks.

What size is set in the New Message widow in Mail?
Uploaded with plasq's Skitch!
Regards
TD

Printed type much smaller than screen type

I'm working on a Sawtooth G4 running OS 9.2.2. When I print (SimpleText, Word, Excel) the printed type is much smaller than the designated screen size. For instance, if I print 24-point type, it comes out about 14 or 12. If I print 12, it's about six- or seven-point.
The only application not affected is QuarkXPress 4.0.
I'm running ATM Deluxe 4.6.1.
Ideas?

That suggets the wrong driver, or wrong configuration in the right driver.
What printer is this, please?
Has it ever worked properly and does it have the maker's latest drivers for OS 9?
Does it make ny difference what font is used?
Does the same text still shrink in Word and not in XPress if it's typed in one then pasted into the other?

Exported video size smaller than original video size. How do I keep the original size?

I exporting a video from Adobe Premiere CS6 today, and I noticed the video was about 1/2 times smaller than the original video I put in. I then uploaded the video on YouTube, and the size was still the same. I tried to change the preset to 1080p 29.97, 1080p 25, etc. and the same with 720p, and 480p, but the size only changed slightly.
How do I keep the original size after exportation of videos?

More information needed for someone to help... please click below and provide the requested information
-Information FAQ http://forums.adobe.com/message/4200840
Also, exactly what are you editing, and what are your export settings?
Also, The tutorial list in message #3 http://forums.adobe.com/message/2276578 may help

When using text edit, the font as it appears on the screen is ok, but when I print, it is much smaller on the paper than the chosen font size. How do I correct this?

When using TextEdit, the font as it appears on the screen is ok, but after printing, the font is much smaller on the paper than the chosen size. (in this case 14)
How do I correct this?

Hi Corel
Thank you for your reply
However I need the lower case version for some sites and the upper case version for the site in question? To make matters worse this site does not allow you to change your log on name unless it is in the form of an e-mail address
So what I need is Kostas for this site and kostas saved for other sites and allow me to choose which one I want to use
How do I do this please
I have no bother with this on Win Internet Explorer but I like Firefox
Mind it may be as simple as deleting The appropriate entry and resetting with Kostas instead of kostas?
But I would appreciate knowing the correct solution from an expert

When I save a photo as a jpeg in PE 13 the file size is much smaller than with PE 12. Why?

when I save a photo as a jpeg in PE 13 the file size is much smaller than with PE 12. Why?

Are the image all the same size the % files open into a document seems to vary with the number of pixels the image being opened has. Check the Image size.

Why Is My Snapshot Smaller Than The Webcam?

I am trying to make a snapshot of the users webcam, but the snapshot is 1/4 the size of the running webcam and doesn't fill the bitmap data section. Also is there a better way I can Add and position the snapshot.?
import flash.display.BitmapData;
import flash.display.DisplayObject;
var bandwidth:int = 0; // Specifies the maximum amount of bandwidth that the current outgoing video feed can use, in bytes per second. To specify that Flash Player video can use as much bandwidth as needed to maintain the value of quality , pass 0 for bandwidth . The default value is 16384.
var quality:int = 100; // this value is 0-100 with 1 being the lowest quality. Pass 0 if you want the quality to vary to keep better framerates
var cam:Camera = Camera.getCamera();
cam.setQuality(bandwidth, quality);
cam.setMode(320,240,30,false); // setMode(videoWidth, videoHeight, video fps, favor area)
video_vobj.attachCamera(cam);
stage.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, takephoto);
var screenS:BitmapData = new BitmapData(320, 240, true, 0xCCCCCCCC);
var screenS_image:Bitmap=new Bitmap(screenS);
function takephoto(e:MouseEvent):void
screenS.draw(video_vobj) ;
addChild(screenS_image) ;
screenS_image.x = 360;
screenS_image.y = 20;

OK…I purchased and downloaded Elements 9.0 for my MACs ( I have two in two different locations). I installed on both and the brushes work as expected on one of them but not the other. Guess that is why I asked about a reinstall….possibly something went wrong on this computer when installed.
I am just trying to create an image for a background paper and have selected a brush. I resize it with the bracket key (and have also tried resizing with the slider on the menu up top). I hover the brush over the area I want to place it and then click. The brush is smaller than the hover image every time. Makes it hard to know where to lace my brush for proper placement. As far as the percentage…..that actually is a guesstimate, but it isn't 50% smaller that's for sure.
Eileen

Hello, I have a Mac computer with NVIDIA 750M dedicated graphics card and monitor EIZO but the problem was there when I was working with Windows and Acer monitor. When I open a file from Camera Raw in PS this is smaller than the screen so I double-click w

Hello, I have a Mac computer with NVIDIA 750M dedicated graphics card and monitor EIZO but the problem was there when I was working with Windows and Acer monitor. When I open a file from Camera Raw in PS this is smaller than the screen so I double-click with the tool "hand" to fit on the screen, but the picture loses sharpness and becomes blurry. If you magnify the image even only slightly with the tool "zoom" the picture comes back clear. In Camera Raw instead is always sharp. I solve the problem by turning off the graphics card in PS but often use plugin that need the graphics card otherwise the processing time is much longer. I ask for help.
Thanks.

Hello, I have a Mac computer with NVIDIA 750M dedicated graphics card and monitor EIZO but the problem was there when I was working with Windows and Acer monitor. When I open a file from Camera Raw in PS this is smaller than the screen so I double-click with the tool "hand" to fit on the screen, but the picture loses sharpness and becomes blurry. If you magnify the image even only slightly with the tool "zoom" the picture comes back clear. In Camera Raw instead is always sharp. I solve the problem by turning off the graphics card in PS but often use plugin that need the graphics card otherwise the processing time is much longer. I ask for help.
Thanks.

I updated to 5.0 beta and the page on the screed is smaller than the previous version and I cant get the zoom to work to increase the text and pictures.

the text and pictures is very small or at leat much smaller than in the prior version and the zoom will not make it bigger.

Hi Idreier,
I'd try starting Firefox in [[Safe Mode]]. If you don't have the issue while all of your add-ons, extensions, and themes are disabled, you can try adding them back in one by one until you find the culprit.
Hopefully this helps!

Why is menu size so much larger than the files?

I am somewhat perplexed - I'm making a single-layer dvd and have a simple single screen theme (no animation) - it has one drop zone. The movie has 28 chapters so there are five of them, but so far I've added only one montage of photos to each menu page - it's a "mobile" quality in media browser and ave only 10 - 20 MB, then one song. On average these movie clips are 1:00 to 2:00 min long and the music is cut to that length. So, all told, it's probably less than 110 MB in files - but when I look at the project properties, the menus are 3301 MB!!!
The movie itself is only 1.1 GB so what is going on?
It's preventing me from doing the project and I've got no idea why it's making the menu size so much larger than the file sizes?
Can you please help me figure out what to do?
Alexa

The 2 min clips were natively 2 min - I had each one separate and actually converted to media browser in "mobile" size (b/c the drop zone was 4 x 6 in size in the theme). They were tiny - in most cases I was shortening the audio (e.g. the song was 4 minutes and I was setting the loop to only 1:30 b/c that's how long the video clip was on the menu).
BUT, to resolve the question (I always like to post the answer) - I ended up duplicating the project to try to reimport the video. It was a fresh iDVD project and I happened to click on the project tree of screens - and, lo and behold, the ENTIRE menu was duplicated for some reason (and the movie, actually). I went back to the original and it was the same! I have no idea how that would happen do you? It only had one main menu screen - and then an entire duplicate menu - which I wouldn't even know how to access if I didn't see it in the project menu tree?
The only think of is that at one point I added a title menu link to the scene selection - it gave me a warning that my menu was more than 12 minutes, did I want to fix or ignore and fix later - which confused me b/c it was under 12 min, then but I clicked ignore. Does that create an alternate title menu and send people back to something else?
Anyway, I deleted the entire extra scene selection menus (5 of them) and it was back to under 4 GB.
So, I was able to burn, but still wondering about creating the "title menu" link on scene selections? It drives me crazy that it doesn't automatically do that so I like to add "main menu" links.
Thanks for your help!
Alexa

Why the flashback log'size smaller than the archived log ?

hi, all . why the flashback log'size smaller than the archived log ?

Lonion wrote:
hi, all . why the flashback log'size smaller than the archived log ?Both are different.
Flash logs size depends on parameter DB_FLASHBACK_RETENTION_TARGET , how much you want to keep.
Archive log files is dumped file of Online redo log files, It can be either size of Online redo log file size or less depending on online redo size when switch occurred.
Some more information:-
Flashback log files can be created only under the Flash Recovery Area (that must be configured before enabling the Flashback Database functionality). RVWR creates flashback log files into a directory named “FLASHBACK” under FRA. The size of every generated flashback log file is again under Oracle’s control. According to current Oracle environment – during normal database activity flashback log files have size of 8200192 bytes. It is very close value to the current redo log buffer size. The size of a generated flashback log file can differs during shutdown and startup database activities. Flashback log file sizes can differ during high intensive write activity as well.
Source:- http://dba-blog.blogspot.in/2006/05/flashback-database-feature.html
Edited by: CKPT on Jun 14, 2012 7:34 PM

External projection much darker than the source

I am using a mini displayport to vga adapter and the external image is much darker than the source running on my mbp. this is going into a mixer then out to a projector. I also have an old pre intel powerbook that is doing the same thing(into a mixer and out to a projector) with s-video , with no problems at all.
this is a recent problem with the mbp,6 months ago it worked fine.
could it be the new os? if so how do i get back to the one i need?

I am having the same problem with my brand new MacBook Pro connecting to a video projector with a Mini-display to VGA connector. Many of the pictures are darker
than they should be. In PowerPoint I had to go to those darker slides and lighten them up (brightness up and contrast down). Now they are tolerable, but they still look better on the Mac screen than the projected image. Have tried three different projectors and find the same result. Projected colors are quite a bit different also. Puzzeled in Pennsylvania

NetStream.bytesTotal is much smaller than the video

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for