Network Card for HP Laser Jet 2420

What type of network card do I need do I buy to put this printer on a network?

Hi,
Sorry, looks like no other choice since they (all models of the series) shown on the following links:
  http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/au/en/sm/WF10a/1897​2-18972-3328059-3328066-3328066-416419.html
  http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/us/en/sm/WF13a/1897​2-236251-236263-14638-f51-416419.html
Regards.
BH
**Click the KUDOS thumb up on the left to say 'Thanks'**
Make it easier for other people to find solutions by marking a Reply 'Accept as Solution' if it solves your problem.

Similar Messages

  • Microsoft surface and laser jet 2420

    i have a microsoft surface tablet. when i try to install my laser jet 2420, it installs it under "other devices" instead of under printers. is there a way to move it?

    Hi,
    Can you see "HP Printer Control" app ? Your printer should be in that group. You can move icon from other area to that group. Please use the following information:
       http://www.microsoft.com/surface/en-au/support/apps-and-windows-store/start-and-close-apps
    Regards.
    BH
    **Click the KUDOS thumb up on the left to say 'Thanks'**
    Make it easier for other people to find solutions by marking a Reply 'Accept as Solution' if it solves your problem.

  • I HAVE A MAC NETWORK WITH A HP LASER-JET AND EVERYTHING IS WORKING FINE.  I ALSO HAVE A WINDOWS BASED MACHINE THAT I WOULD LIKE TO PRINT TO AS WELL.  HOW CAN I ACCOMPLISH THIS?

    I HAVE A MAC NETWORK WITH A HP1200 LASER-JET AND EVERYTHING IS WORKING FINE.  THE PRINTER IS CONNECTED DIRECTLY WITH ONE OF MY MAC-MINI"S.  I NOW HAVE A WINDOWS BASED PC AND WOULD LIKE TO PRINT TO IT AS WELL.. HOW CAN I DO THIS?

    Make sure that you Printer Sharing enabled on the Mac Mini.   System Preferences > Sharing > Printer Sharing
    Do the same on the PC
    On the PC, try downloading and installing Bonjour Print Services for Windows v2.0.2
    Run the application on the PC to see if it will discover your printer and install the printer.

  • Hard code spwr network card for 100-full

    How can I hard code a spwr network card for 100-full duplex?
    thanks,
    Clark

    The following lines added to /etc/system sets a hme network card to 100 full duplex,
    set hme:hme_adv_autoneg_cap=0
    set hme:hme_adv_100T4_cap=0
    set hme:hme_adv_100fdx_cap=1
    set hme:hme_adv_100hdx_cap=0
    set hme:hme_adv_10fdx_cap=0
    set hme:hme_adv_10hdx_cap=0

  • Network card for G$

    Can someone recommend a network card for a G4 ?
    My built-in card died recently. I installed a DFE-530TX but couldn't get it to work with 10.3.9.
    I am looking at some of the G-wireless options but not sure which one to select.
    Any recommendation will be greatly appreciated.
    G4   Mac OS X (10.3.9)  
    power g4   Mac OS X (10.3.9)  
    G4   Mac OS X (10.3.9)  

    Hi alexago,
    Welcome to the Discussions.
    metaphyz had a page of Mac OS wireless compatibility list but it seems to be down. Google has it cacked though. Click on the words in blue above to see the cached page.
    John

  • Need driver for hp laser jet 4 plus with windows 7

    need driver for hp laser jet 4 plus with windows 7

    Hi,
    A friend of mine uses USB-Parallel cable, he was saying it's ok
    Good luck,
    BH
    **Click the KUDOS thumb up on the left to say 'Thanks'**
    Make it easier for other people to find solutions by marking a Reply 'Accept as Solution' if it solves your problem.

  • Need Driver For Hp Laser Jet 5L/6L for Window Xp, 7

    i have hp laser jet 5L and 6L pinrter and has xp and window 7 os. i have searched for drivers on google and found many but none of them working  for me. the porblem is when is send pirnt command to printer. the status is printing for 4,5 minutes then it prompts an error that "failed to print".
    Please guide me to the official drivers for hp laser jet 5L and 6L.

    Hi @Taqi_Shah 
    I suspect your question would be better answered in the HP Enterprise Business Community,  as the HP LaserJet 5L and 6L are commercial models.
    My technical expertise is with consumer products and software, I am sure the commercial folks would be happy to help if you re-post your question for them to answer. The HP Enterprise Business Community is an HP Forum designed for the Commercial and Enterprise customers to help one another. I am sure you will find some HP folks there to help too.
    Click here to view the Printing and Digital Imaging.  When the page opens you will see the option to 'Log in' or 'Register Now' on the right. The commercial forums are separate from the consumer boards, thus you will need to register if you don't already have a commercial account.
    You may find the following helpful while you awit to hear from somebody on the commercial boards; HP LaserJet - Driver and software support for Windows 7
    Best of luck.
    Please click the Thumbs up icon below to thank me for responding.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Please click “Accept as Solution” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
    Sunshyn2005 - I work on behalf of HP

  • Network Card for PowerBook G3

    Hello everyone,
    I have an older laptop and I have been told that I can only access the Internet with dialup because the computer does not have a network card.
    Is there one available for the PowerBook G3. Better yet, can I get a wireless card?
    Thank you very much
    N
    Macintosh PowerBook G3   Mac OS 8.6 or Earlier   Mac OS 8.5.1

    Welcome to Apple Discussions!
    The Powerbook G3 has a built-in ethernet port. It is the same as a "network card" 10-base-T. It is slightly wider than the telephone cable though looks like a phone jack.
    What age Powerbook G3 do you have? Some have a built-in port to insert an older style airport card (not the Airport Extreme), while others require using a PCMCIA WiFi card such as the Lucent Orinico Gold. See this article to identify your Powerbook G3:
    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=24604

  • SPAD: Device type to be selected for 'HP Laser Jet P2055dn'

    Hi,
    Recently we were asked to configure 'HP Laser Jet P2055dn' as the cheque printer in our landscpe.
    While configuring the printer, I have a doubt of the Device Type to be selected in SPAD settings.
    Could you please suggest me which Device Type to be selected for this printer
    Below are the details of the Printer provided o me by the infrastructure team:
    HP Universal Printing PCL 5:  'HP Laser Jet P2055dn' with a Troy badge on it
    Regards,
    Manish Sharma

    Hello,
    Try using HP Laserjet 4 series PCL-5 driver for the printer you have mentioned.
    Otherwise you can customize your own drivers with needed controls, formats, etc macthing the cheque printing.
    Regards,
    Yoganand.V

  • Replacement network cards for MacPro

    My question is for anyone who is familiar with the MacPro motherboard. Lightning blew out my dual ethernet card and the estimate to replace it is around $450. A friend told me I could purchase a compatible network card and plug it directly into one of the three available slots on the mother board. If this is true, could anyone suggest to me a network card that is compatible with the MacPro motherboard? I would appreciate any help with this issue!

    Are you considering any particular cards ?
    I have had good luck with DEC21040 (10baseT) and DEC21140 (100baseT) cards
    in Solaris 7 through Solaris 10 on x86.
    The same can be said for 3Com 3C905C-TX cards.
    Solaris 8x86 will recognize many chipsets natively,
    and a number of third party developers have created working driver packages.
    Most of their driver packages are free, but a few are not free.
    Solaris 9 works with a few more, and Solaris 10 works with yet more adapters.
    The Solaris 8x86 HCL list has the native cards.
    This other Sun web page can direct you toward 3rd party sites.

  • Network cards for Solaris 8 x86

    Which network cards are supported by Solaris 8 x86 ?
    Thank you !
    dorin.

    Are you considering any particular cards ?
    I have had good luck with DEC21040 (10baseT) and DEC21140 (100baseT) cards
    in Solaris 7 through Solaris 10 on x86.
    The same can be said for 3Com 3C905C-TX cards.
    Solaris 8x86 will recognize many chipsets natively,
    and a number of third party developers have created working driver packages.
    Most of their driver packages are free, but a few are not free.
    Solaris 9 works with a few more, and Solaris 10 works with yet more adapters.
    The Solaris 8x86 HCL list has the native cards.
    This other Sun web page can direct you toward 3rd party sites.

  • XPS 8700 - need additional network card for VMware Workstation

    Hello -
    I'm wanting to add either a dual or quad network card to my XPS 8700 so I can provide physical interfaces for some VMware Workstaion.  Is there a specific band or model that is compatible..?
    I've tried installing a spare Intel E1G42ET (dual port) card I had laying around, but the OS never saw it even with the drivers from Intel's website loaded up.
    Any suggestions..?  Thanks,

    No - but it's just another card to the BIOS. Also, there's already a Wireless NIC and an Ethernet NIC in there.  I appreciate the suggestion - I can test it,. but suspect the issue will remain the same.
    Thanks,

  • Fix for hp laser jet CM1312nfi MFP printer and OS X 10.10.2

     My HP CM1312nfi MFP laser jet printer, with the latest driver 1.5.0, will only print with my iMac OS X 10.10.2, I cannot scan at all, even with image capture the scanner does not work or show up. My wife's Mac Book is running 10.9.5 and printer driver 1.4.1, she can scan with hp scan but only with the flat bed scan not the tray feeder. I can't find a download for the older driver to try that.
    Very frustrating to have a perfectly good HP MFP printer that seems to no longer be supported by the manufacturer!!! The printer is working fine with the PCs in the house. 
    Does anyone have a fix for this? 

    Hi ShlomiL,
    Thank you for your answer.
    I'm aware of the download you pointed out, but my question was different.
    I asked why the new version provided to Apple from HP (and from Apple to the customers) won't work as intended anymore. Until few days ago, all I had to do was plugging in the USB cable and my Mac would install all the required software, without all the additional packages I would not like to have.
    I wanted to contact Apple but the software is made by HP, so I thought HP should know about compatibility issues. I know this is a community board but I wouldn't know how to get in touch with the Mac software makers.
    If the issue won't be risolved I might just try and install the package from this website, but that would not be a fix for a problem recently introduced and that I thought I'd point out.
    Thanks again,
    Mario

  • Utlizing 4 network cards for SUN v245

    Hi
    I would like to check if using the 4 network cards binded to the same ip address would be able to utlilize 1000Mbps?
    Or would just configuring 1 card be sufficient?
    How is it done??
    thanks

    Did a traditional, JETless jump overnight, and had the same effect. So it's not JET.

  • Teamed network cards for domain controllers?

    can someone help me to resolve a debate we have: my colleage states that domain controllers (in our case Win2003SP2) should "not" have their network cards teamed for high availability (via HP's NIC teaming software).? I've not heard of this and cannot Bing/Google anything like this. I'm under the impression that a domain controller "should" have it's gigabit NICs teamed to make sure that directory services are highly available.
    any information on this would be great. thanks...Peter A. Berger Jr.

    Fault Tolerance and Network Teaming
                    Anyone who has called Microsoft for help with a networking problem has likely heard the question: "Are you using network teaming?" I have often heard this referred to by Microsoft's customers as a "quick out" or an excuse that Microsoft was looking to pass the responsibility on to someone else. As someone that has been on both ends of the phone, and at the highest escalation point within Microsoft's Network queues I can tell you that it is a question born of wisdom and tempered with experience. While working the phones at Microsoft, supporting the largest and most critical systems in the US it was rare to ever get a call about the same problem more than once. Even more rare was for everyone on our group to get the same calls, and have the same experiences. I recall it happening when we fought the blaster worm, and when Microsoft's "Scalable Networking Pack" was released with 2003 SP2. These were bad, but a few months went by and except for a few straggles the phone calls stopped, the world got wise to the issue and the problem was resolved. I was amazed though to experience 1-3 calls a week with network issues CAUSED by network teaming. I could not help but be blown away by the irony of a program meant to avoid network failure so often causing it. I talked to colleagues, (of which I have found no better single source in the industry than at Microsoft), and found that even the old timers having more than 15 years with the company had the same stories of problems caused by networking teaming as we are constantly experiencing today. I am amazed that an industry as wise and agile as the computer industry has been (and is), has stuck with such a poor technology. I always asked my customers as the called with problems, usually critical ones, "What is teaming these network cards getting you". Almost unanimously the answer would come fault tolerance, to which I would reply rhetorically "How often do you NICs or Switches fail and how often has teaming caused network failure?" In my opinion, it is unforgivable for an application to constantly cause the problem that it is written to avoid. It should cause pause and reflection as to whether the technology is well suited for its function, whether it is just written poorly or if all of its implementations have similar problems. Technology today is beyond network teaming. There are far better methods of providing fault tolerance with manual and automatic failover. Most application writers have taken into consideration fault tolerance at the service level superseding anything that network teaming offers, so that network teaming should be a dead technology, because it is killing us.
                    Finally, if you are considering using network teaming, or have had reason to reconsider its use, maybe these questions will help your assessment:
                    What is my goal with using network teaming?
                    Can I gain Availability through use of a more capable NIC card?
                    How often have my NIC cards failed?
                    When NIC cards have failed were they the only failure, or was it in conjunction with a Motherboard or other failure causing the service to be unavailable?
                    What are my needs for uptime for these services?
                    Would a manual failover (the simplest of options) be viable for this service?
                    What options for automatic failover do I have (since most applications can have multiple providers through configuration)?
                    One other note to add. While working on the phones at Microsoft, and later as a consultant to large and federal organizations, I found one thing that seemed to be true most of the time. When a problem occurred, it was rarely the OS itself, but something unnatural to its processes. Simplicity and minimalism is really one of the keys to a healthy server and environment. Often it is necessary to introduce other applications and services, but I do not think near as often as we do.
    Note: MSFT does not support network teaming, because they do not own the software that provides it. In certain instances though, like with OCS, they flat out will not support OCS if teaming is enabled on the server.
    Note2: I realize my comments above are very general, and so I want to apply these to this exact question. When I consider AD and how to make it fault tolerant, I cannot help but realize that the protocols, clients and services that make up Directory Services, are beautifully fault tolerant. In most cases, the loss of any one DC would not greatly affect the user's ability to authenticate to a computer or service within the domain. Even more, Directory services is inherently so fault tolerant that it can still function with the loss of a major part of the servers that make it up.
    Don't forget to give credit where credit is due, vote this as helpful if it helped you.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Design Problem in Java

    Problem definition: Consider the following !! You are writing the s/w for an interface to an appliance and the interface has the following things on it !! 1) three buttons - reset clear and power on/off !! 2) LCD display which shows error messages th

  • I installed Maverick's and now I can no longer use my Epson Scanners, Epson Perfection V700 Photo and the GT-S50 ?

    My MAC now notes that I can't open the application "Epson Scan" because PowerPC application are no longer supported. What is the fix and how do I download it ? Thanks, Rusty in the Rockies

  • Media Hub not available on windows network

    I have a strange problem I've been trying to solve and really need some help.  My media hub boots correctly and for a period of about 5-10 minutes, appears as normal over the windows network.  I've mapped drives and can access the unit through those

  • Message signature for NTLMv2 Authentication message

    Hi, I'm implementing NTLMv2 support for SMBv2 and I have encountered some problems calculating the correct checksum for the authentication message.  Authentication packet: 4E 54 4C 4D 53 53 50 00 03 00 00 00 18 00 18 00 AE 00 00 00 42 01 42 01 C6 00

  • U510 Win 7 neu Installation Wie SSD nutzen

    Hallo Leute ich habe ein Problem mit der Neuinstallation von Win 7.Kurz zur Erklärung mein Bruder hat Wín 7 direkt auf die 24 GB SSD Installiert und die ist nun voll. Also hat er mich gefragt wie das sein kann. Ich habe mich jetzt schlau gemacht und