New 8 Core Mac Pro Question

What will the 8 Core Mac Pro do for Aperture? I know you need 4 gig of ram and the ATI video card. I am just curious about what processor to purchase.
I find that Exporting images from a wedding of 800 or so images takes about 2.5 hours on my G5 Dual 1.8 with 3 gigs of ram. I would really like to speed up the Export process!
I will also be using Photoshop CS3 when it ships. Will Actions that I have written run faster on the 8 Core Machine?
I just need some buying advice.
Kevin Hawkins

How much Aperture alone sees today is not so much the point as is what happens with real world performance. Real world it is not just about the theoretical limit of what Aperture sees; apps and the OS/RAM/GPU/CPUs all work together, and folks typically do have more than one app open at a time. My expectation is that although certainly fully functional with 4 GB, the kind of users that run Aperture on a MP will find that greater than 4 GB of RAM is clearly beneficial.
Anecdotal reports also seem to indicate that Mac Pros have an inherent need for more RAM than previous boxes needed.
Also OS 10.5/Leopard is due soon enough that we should be planning new box configurations based on our expectations of what impact Leopard and Aperture v2 will have on RAM utilization. My strong opinion is that we will be able to take advantage of more RAM as 2007/2008 play out.
In any event 4 or 5 (1 Apple plus 4 third party) GB of RAM is an excellent place to start, and RAM always gets cheaper and is easy to retrofit later. IMO we should buy only 2 GB sized DIMMs to facilitate maximum future expansion.
-Allen Wicks

Similar Messages

  • Limited In Establishing an A/V  Connection Using New 2008 Mac Pro 8-Core

    I will apologize in advance for the long and complicated story that follows.
    I purchased this 8-core Mac Pro two weeks ago. I installed all software fresh on the Mac Pro and transferred no data from an iMac I had previously been using. The Mac Pro was running fine and I was able to have a video iChat with one of my friends across town who has a mid-2007 iMac with no difficulty. I had initially set up my Mac Pro with file sharing turned on so that I could exchange files with my wife who took possession of my mid-2007 iMac. A few days went by and my wife decided to turn off file sharing on my Mac Pro. Suddenly my Mac Pro would not boot at all, showing the spinning black pinwheel and the silver screen with the Apple logo for more than 30 minutes. I tried to repair permissions on the Mac HD, but I got a red error message that the permissions could not be repaired. Interestingly enough Verify Disk ran and report no problems with the Mac HD.
    At this point I did a full erase of the Mac HD, and did a complete restore from Time Machine. After a few minor changes like having to reimport my e-mail, my Mac Pro seemed to be working fine again. However, today I received a iChat video invitation from my friend across town, and when I responded, I soon got a "failure to establish communication" message. I then tried to establish a video chat with my friend. After watching the spinning black wheel in the iChat dialog (which had good video), I soon got the same message. He also got this message on his end. We were able to establish Text Message communication through iChat, but we could not establish either video or audio. My friend's Mac was working fine in iChat because he had just been iChatting using video with one of his friends. The problem thus was firmly on my end.
    At this point, I tried to video iChat from my Mac Pro with my wife in the next room on her iMac. It worked perfectly and we had both good audio and video. However, every time I attempted to iChat with my friend across town with, I always soon received the message that the connection could not be made bacause my friend had not responded, which of course, he had.
    I deleted all of my user preferences related to iChat (four if I recall correctly) but this did not help.
    In summary, I have limited use of video iChatting from my Mac Pro only with my wife next door on her iMac. Incidentally, I went over to her iMac, logged on, and instantly had a video iChat going with my friend across town.
    I have just spent 3 hours on the phone with Apple Suport and went through several layers of tech support. In the end, their only recommendation was to do a complete erase and reinstallation of the OS. I am not willing, at least at this time, to do this since I have every one of Apple's Pro software applications (FCS2, Aperture, Logic PRo 8 Studio, etc.) installed on this machine and it takes a long time to reinstall all that software.
    I would be extremely grateful for any suggestions that anyone may have.
    Tom

    I finally solved this problem by doing three things. I do not know which of the three really solved the problem, but one of them did. Since this is a new Mac Pro the weekly and monthly maintenance routines had not been run. I ran them using a widget called Maintidigit. Second, I reinstalled iChat directly from the Leopard install disk. Third, I rebooted my cable modem (Road Runner) and then I rebooted my Buffalo Router and while power was off to the Buffalo Router, I unplugged and then plugged in all cables to it. I then plugged in the power cable. Video iChatting with my friend across town worked perfectly with no error messages after these three changes.
    Tom

  • Installing new hard drive in Mac Pro - question about compatibility.

    I'm looking to install an extra internal hard drive in my 2009 Mac Pro, but I need to know if there are any compatibility issues with newer hard drives. I am looking at the Western Digital WD1002FAEX Caviar Black:
    http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B0036Q7MV0/ref=s9_simh_gw_p147_d0_g147_i1?pf_ rd_m=A3P5ROKL5A1OLE&pf_rd_s=center-2&pf_rd_r=1HY9SF4S3JFEA79TK610&pf_rd_t=101&pf _rd_p=467128533&pf_rd_i=468294
    Would anyone be able to tell me if this is likely to be compatible with my 2009 8 core Mac Pro? Or if there is anything I should be looking out for in particular? I know pre-installed hard drives are 3GB/s and the above hard drive is 6GB/s, does this matter?

    Any SATA drive
    About urls:
    http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B0036Q7MV0/
    is all that is needed.
    For a bit more, WD1502FAEX WD Black 1.5TB
    http://www.wdc.com/en/products/internal/enterprise/

  • Illustrator CC 2014 running EXTREMELY slow on brand new 6 Core Mac Pro with 64Gbs of Ram. This can't be right :(

    Hi,
    I've just picked up a brand new 6 core Mac Pro and I am having some serious lag issues with Illustrator CC 2014. I am just trying to select relatively simple objects (an illustration of the side of a coin) and there is a massive delay between when I click on an object and when it actually becomes selected.
    Someone please tell me they know how to fix this? Please

    after the two fixes above in illustrator cc Im still experiencing
    file open - nothing happens
    file place nothing happens
    fix - quit illustrator and restart - open file from the folder lol
    PS CC
    A wierd warning popping when I want to open a file nothing opens just the warning
    fix quit out and start again
    for those of you out there in yur 40s and this is your career you started like me on photoshop 2 or 3 on an lc 6/100 60 and even on the quadras lol
    this is the first time Ive had seen so many bugs in adobe software
    why I bought it the curve tool astute dont have a curve tool and I work alot with them and the funky title branding it looks cool visual consumer glutton lol
    so yeah now going to look at how to stop my monthly subscription  will proabably have to go to that forum next lol
    an d evert back to CS6 im outputting to many jobs to have these hold ups

  • Which memory modules to use for upgrade 8 core Mac Pro

    I am planning to upgrade the memory in my new 8 core Mac Pro, I use it for graphics and video editing (FCS2), I am wondering what would be the advantages and differences between getting the 8GB upgrade in 2-pair of 4GB module or 4-pair of 2GB module, I know the price for the first choice is almost double the second.

    OK, so according to the http://www.barefeats.com/harper3.html Memory Tests, all slots filled means the fastest speed. So here's my question:
    I'm about to buy a 2,8GHz MacPro with 2GB RAM, and I want to upgrade to 8GB. I was considering buy an 8GB Kit from Crucial (629.99$), and either leave the original 2GB and add the 8GB to the free slots, or just take the original out and leave only the 8GB modules. And this would be my question before reading the Memory Tests article.
    So I went back to Crucial's online store and did some math, to see how much it would cost me to fill the remainder slots (6, counting off the 2 used by the original RAM) with 1GB modules, instead of my previous idea of 8GB (2x4GB). So, a 2GB Kit (2x1GB) cost 127.99$, multiplied by 3, which is what I would need to achieve a total of 6GB, to add to the original 2GB, will cost 383.97$.
    That's 246$ less than the 8GB Kit! And according to the Memory Tests, even faster.
    Isn't this too good to be true? What's your word?
    Thanks a lot.

  • Anyone using a 12 Core Mac Pro? I have HORRIBLE performance issues .. Help!

    After the latest 10.7.4 Mac OS X update I have extremely horrible performance issues with AE ... and they were not so great before the update.
    It is still stabilizing ... but an 1:19 clip in SD is taking 12 HOURS TO analyze and stabilize. !!!
    The 12 cores are barely being used and this problem has been an issue since I purchased the suite over a year ago.
    Does anyone else have problems using AE on their 12 CORE MAC PRO?
    REPLY ONLY IF YOU HAVE A 12 CORE MAC PRO PLEASE.
    There must be a problem because since the update ... Adobe Encore is PERFECT .. and ALL 12 CORES MAX OUT and the encoding is quick!!
    I also have major problems between PP and AE using Dynamic link .. and slow renders in PP.
    Everything else works fine .. other apps / other vendors.
    I am calling Adobe today.

    Thank you for your time.
    I am using a 12 Core 2.93 GHZ with 32 GB RAAM and a NVidia GTX 285.
    I also have a Areca 1212 PCI RAID Card. ( NOTE: I HAVE A SERIOUS RAID DRIVER PROBLEM NOW. THE RAID IS DISCONNECTED )
    Mac OS X 10.7.4
    Adobe Master Suite 5.5
    The Apple "Console" app logs a whole lot of these three Adobe related errors:
    1. 5/18/12 2:10:16.260 AM aeselflink: CFURLCreateWithString was passed this invalid URL string: '/System/Library/Frameworks/System.framework' (a file system path instead of an URL string). The URL created will not work with most file URL functions. CFURLCreateWithFileSystemPath or CFURLCreateWithFileSystemPathRelativeToBase should be used instead.
    2.) 5/18/12 2:10:16.331 AM aeselflink: -[NSMenu menuID]: unrecognized selector sent to instance 0x1183100e0
    5/18/12 2:10:17.333 AM aeselflink: -[NSMenu menuID]: unrecognized selector sent to instance 0x115625740
    3.) 5/18/12 2:11:18.596 AM [0x0-0x9b09b].com.adobe.aerendercore: You have at least one output module template that refers to a missing output plug-in.  Please check your Output Module Templates.
    Only half of my hyperthreaded processors are active when using AE "Warp Stabilizer". This issue was addressed before in the Forums. There was no solution. I dont' know if it is any better in CS 6.
    Also the automatic saving of all linked compositions while using the dynamic link feature bewteen PP and AE causes huge inoperatable waiting times .. unbearable. My guess is that the new "Global Performance Cache " fixes this ... which I consider update to a terrible problem .. but they sell it as a feature ( Ill go into that later.
    Question:
    What RAID card are you using?
    Do you use the Warp Stabilizer?

  • Need help improving XP SP3 performance on 4-core Mac Pro 2009

    I'm running Windows XP SP3 under Boot Camp 3 (Mac OS X v. 10.6.2). Currently, XP is on a second partitioned HD, but it was previously running on a drive all its own with the same problems which are:
    When I boot into Windows the sound stutters quite a bit. I updated the Realtek drivers and used the Apple USB device (24" LED speakers) but nothing completely got rid of the static/stuttering.
    The real problem comes when running Left 4 Dead. Whenever I get to a new part of any level (where zombies are) the graphics freeze for up to a few seconds and the sound gets glitchy, repeating broken staticky snippets. I don't have other games installed but I get similar performance when watching a YouTube video in Firefox.
    Is this normal for Windows on a Mac Pro or do other Mac Pro Boot Campers run Windows smoothly? I have seen YouTube videos of Windows running smoothly on MacBook Pros and iMacs. Just wondering if I'm doing something wrong.
    Finally, I'm running two graphics cards, an ATI 4870 and an NVIDIA GT120. I've run with both on, one off, the other off, the NVIDIA removed, the NVIDIA installed. No matter what I do, the video glitchiness is always pretty bad. (The audio is also bad.)
    Thanks in advance for any info or pointers.

    I have had success running boot camp on an 8-core Mac Pro from 2009. I have an ATI 4870.
    I initially used Windows 7 Beta (32bit) and then RC (64bit) and finally the shipping version (64 bit Professional).
    32-Bit crippled Crysis performance for me (only the demo). I was able to run the game with most settings all the way up (excluding Anti-aliasing), at 1920x1080 and it ran fine for about one minute before hitting the hard-drive for about 10 seconds. This thrashing occurred repeatedly and I have up - that problem was resolved when I moved to 64bit Windows.
    Other games I have played with no trouble are The Orange Box & Borderlands, each with maxed resolution and settings.
    Optical audio and the front headphones work fine for me - though the 4 conductor cord does not recognize the microphone (from an iPhone headset) in Windows, which gets me down as it would be nice to audio-chat in some games.
    Try these thing in this order if you can, and have not already:
    Patch the game (though if this is happening in Firefox as well, it seems like an OS problem)
    Update directX (I really have no clue here, I assume Windows does this automatically?)
    Try demos of other games
    Upgrade the OS to 64bit (Especially if you have over 3GB of ram
    Go from XP to 7 (I have had no trouble with Windows 7 on my machine)
    Try a DVI monitor (I am using a 21" Westinghouse, have never connected an Apple display)
    Good luck!
    Owen

  • Trying to load pre-2006 lso files into Logic 8 on my new intel Mac Pro

    I'm trying to load pre-2006 lso files into Logic 8 on my new intel Mac Pro, but they crash the app every time. files saved 2006 and later load OK. Anybody shed any light on this or know of a fix (other than the laborious work-around of re-saving all early lso's in logic 8 on the PPC and physically moving them via a portable drive to the new machine)?
    (BTW, those files also crash the Logic 7 installed on the intel Mac.)

    Upon further work with my migration, I find I was incorrect in the time frame assertion of these failed files: apparently, the creation/modification dates have nothing to do with it and the reality is that some files fail at random, while others load just fine. right now it looks to be about 50/50 Beats me why this is.
    Anyway, for those interested, I've discovered a very helpful key to the quick processing of file data for a plethora of files (i. e. re-saving the "bad" lso files as Logic 8 projects on the older CPU and moving them over to my new machine), and that is the 'control key/launch' of the app. I hadn't realized that Apple had added this feature to Logic to enable easier work on multiple song files when one does not require the audio.
    For those who don't know about it, the 'control key/launch' provides an option to disable the core audio at app start-up, thus allowing files to load instantly without loading the plug-in library files associated with tracks - great for copying MIDI data between song files, or in this case, re-saving a batch.
    Still puzzled, though, as to why so many older lso files crash Logic when they attempt to load on my new CPU.

  • Huge CPU-spikes on 8-core Mac Pro

    Hello,
    I just got a new 8-core Mac Pro with 16Gb of RAM. And updated to Logic 9. And Snow Leopard.
    Now logic is giving me the "System overload - could not process data etc" -dialog constantly. From the system performance window I see huge CPU spikes wich cause this dialog when reaching overload at the top. These happen, however, in a spot where there can be just one audio track playing. So it´s not a matter of having a hundred Space Designers happening simultaneously.
    Is there something in the preferences I´m missing?
    I appreciate your help,
    Pessi
    Helsinki, Finland

    Has to be Logic. In 10.5.8 I have a sample track with add. drums and omnisphere. It show 2-3 dots on CPU, logic 9 then in snow , spikes all the way to pops cracks and 100% so it's logic not optimized for snow as it works fine in 10.5.8. I daw this a lot in cubase sx and nuendo and the pc. And youbknow us iverclocking types. Ha ha. We learn howto turn off everything for great audio performance so hopefully apple will address this. Could also be the plug in nit snow ready too butbam leaning more toward core audio having a glitch.
    Again, 10.5.8 is fine. I should test logic 8 too. Hope with the annonced updates coming and more pro features we get more CPUs, dedicated PRO team, express slots in all machines as apple should know, like digi realized, app the $$$$$ is in PROSumer use that's why they bought maudio. Remember how upset the user base was when FireWire dissapeared from MacBooks. Hope we really get back to creative side if things.
    Peace fam.

  • 1066Mhz Memory in a WestMere 12-core Mac Pro

    Hello,
    Thanks for reading and for your help. I've tried to find an anwser on Google but without success.
    I presently have a 2.26Ghz 8-core Mac Pro (Nahelem).
    I would like to exchange it with a 2.66Ghz 12-core Mac Pro (Westmere).
    I previously bought for my 2.26Ghz 8-core Mac Pro (Nahelem) 32Gb of RAM (Hynix HMT151R7BFR8C-G7). It works fine. And I would like to be able to use the same ram in the 2.66Ghz 12-core Mac Pro (Westmere). Is it possible? Even though the Nahelem uses 1066MHz DDR3 ECC SDRAM and the Westmere uses 1333MHz DDR3 ECC SDRAM.
    If it is possible, I understand that I won't be optimal, but I wish to save myself the hassle of selling my old ram, to buy some new. And I will eventually swap the RAM for the right one when prices go down a bit.

    Westmere can use 1333 but shouldn't REQUIRE it. But with Apple hardware...?
    And there isn't that much difference in performance. I know that was mentioned in one blog/post/article.
    Now, as I write this, I am not sure, and definitely not 100%.
    It should. I can't see how it would not (DDR3 is very forgiving except when you go above and beyond like faster RAM and over-clocking).
    From OWC:
    1333MHz and 1066MHz ECC
    Model ID: MacPro5,1
    1333MHz & 1066MHz ECC Mac Pro
    Memory Information
    * Up to 64GB of Total Memory
    * 4 or 8 Total Slots
    * Apple Specified Thermal Sensor
    * DDR3 PC3-10600 ECC 1333MHZ or PC-8500 ECC 1066MHz
    http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/memory/Mac-Pro-Memory#1333-memory
    http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Other%20World%20Computing/1333D3W4M32K/
    Crucial -
    Q: +What memory goes into my computer, and will a faster speed be backward-compatible?+
    A: *DDR3 memory with support for DDR3 PC3-10600 speeds.*
    Crucial 12-Core Mid-2010 Mac Pro
    First word from OWC and MacPerformanceGuide :
    *OWC has confirmed that the 8GB modules do work in the 4/6-core 2010 Mac Pro* > According to OWC, using 3 modules shows a ~ *15% memory bandwidth gain* over 4 modules, so the configurations with a * at right ar the optimal ones. Whether real-world tasks are affected by this small difference remains to be tested, but +in past testing never measured more then 3% hit from using 4 modules instead of 3.+
    Mid-2010 Mac Pro DDR3 Memory @ OWC

  • CPU v. GPU in 12 core Mac Pro

    I think I know the answer to this question but I wanted to ask around to make sure I wasn't missing the obvious.
    Looking at the Compressor4 specs I see that "...Distributed encoding uses available capacity in other cores and other computers to make encoding go faster..." This would imply that running Compressor4 on a couple of 12 core Mac Pros would give you 24 cores worth of crunch. So far, so good.
    But then in the Minimum System Requirements I see "...OpenCL-capable graphics card or Intel HD Graphics 3000 or later..." which would imply that it uses the GPU, not the CPU to crunch on.
    Now I think where I'm getting confused is display v. crunch. If I want to run the Mac Pros headless as a renderfarm then Compressor4 will use the CPU cores to crunch on. However the moment I want to attach a monitor and display what I'm encoding I'll need a nice beefy graphics card that is OpenCL compatable.
    Right?
    So I'm right in thinking that in a headless configuration the graphics card is of little to no importance and adding more of them won't help in the slightest?
    Right?
    The last thing I'm curious about is RAM. Is there going to be a noticable difference between a machine with 8GB RAM and a machine with 24GB RAM? How about breaking the bank and throwing 64GB?
    Thanks for your time.

    There's really no good answer to this because different codec require different resources.  Video Codec A being transformed into Video Codec B will always depend on the resources needed for A or B.  H.264 encoding seems to now to benefit from both the GPU and CPU.  However, ProRes decoding is going to become bottlenecked by the hard drive speed on a 12 core machine.  To be on the safe side, I would get an internal SSD drive and use that for encoding and decoding content.

  • 12 Core Mac Pro and Quark 8.16.2 Processor Crash

    I have installed 2 12 Core Mac pros with Quark 8.16 and am having the same problem on both. After running Quark for 20 or 30 minutes, the processors all run at 100% and Quark eventually becomes unresponsive. A force quit is required.
    Quark has no reports of this problem, anyone else using Quark on a 12 core?

    No change here either... I have been onto Quark and I have deleted the Preferences folder more times than I need to remember... and even deleted in the home/library/preferences/quark and setup a new "Preferences" (Cap P) in the Application/Quark 8.0 folder and still no improvement. It worked perfect at first... then I went back ands setup my settings.... increased cache levels and various settings... so I'm thinking it could be one of those effecting the situation... I haven't had the time or patience to try since the last time... but the Quark defaults work fine for quitting... well they did the time I did it and testing.... just need to test more... or maybe wait for 10.6.5... it might sort it also...
    Talk soon...
    Anthony

  • 12 Core Mac Pro client fails to connect to xsan

    Dear all, hopefully someone can shed some light on this problem.
    We have an xsan system running with clients and MDCs running 10.6.6, XSAN 2.2.1. We have just purchased a new 12 core Mac Pro but we cannot get the machine connected as a client. XSAN admin sees the machine, but fails to write the configuration files on the client. We have tried running the client in 32 and 64 bit modes.
    Has anybody else had the same problem? We do have one other 64 bit 8 core Mac Pro (early 2009) client connected without a problem.
    Any advice would be greatfully received.
    Richard

    Problem solved. Someone had unplugged the metadata ethernet cable!

  • New 2009 Mac Pro, Software Update never finishes (finds no updates/result)

    I have a brand new 8-core Mac Pro (new 2009 Nehalem-based model). The configuration is stock, 2.26GHz CPUs and 6GB of RAM. Bought this at the Apple Store yesterday. It is fresh out of the box; I have not even installed anything yet.
    When I run Software Update, the "Checking for new software..." sheet appears, and the progress bar gets about 10% done, and then it just hangs there. For hours, so I assume infinitely.
    The Software Update program is not crashed--you can still pull down the menus, and if you click Cancel, it will. It just never finds any updates. Nor does it finish the process and tell me my system is up to date.
    I tried it on the command line too, and it hangs in the same way:
    *IT-PC-MACPRO-1:~ mason$ softwareupdate --list*
    *Software Update Tool*
    *Copyright 2002-2007 Apple*
    ...also apparently forever.
    Other than this, I haven't seen any problems with it in one day of use. This obviously seems like a software/configuration problem, not a hardware problem but still... not the best out-of-the-box experience. I am hoping this turns out to be a known issue with a simple fix. But has anybody else seen this issue?
    The one thing I did try was moving the Mac to an entirely different network (from home to office). Other Macs here don't have any problem, just this one.
    Clues appreciated.

    Hi, thanks for the reply.
    1) I found updating worked as expected if I created a another admin account, and used that to run Software Update. However, Software Update still would hang infinitely if I ran it using my main account (again, a fresh account created by unboxing the Mac and doing the first-use interview wizard thing).
    2) Being curious, I tried removing each file you suggested independently, and trying Software Update (without restarting). None had an effect until I removed the ~/Library/Caches/com.apple.SoftwareUpdate
    After moving this folder aside, and launching Software Update again, it worked normally (no reboot required).
    So that's some data, posted for posterity. I saved the corrupt cache file that seems to have caused the problem, so I'll file a bug report with Apple if I have time.

  • Eight Core Mac Pro

    Just a post in case someone wants to know; Logic 8 with the new Mac Pro 8 core machines rocks. I got the stock 2.8GHZ machine (2GB RAM). Screen redraws and meters are smooth, no studders or core overloads. Upgrading from dual 2Ghz G5. Just have to replace my UAD-1 cards now - bummer...
    Oh yeah, after the migration from the old Mac, the Apogee ensemble worked straight away without reinstalling the drivers, etc.
    Paul

    Good luck with those bigger projects, Paul. I just posted this message on the UAudio forum. I sure hope I'm missing something simple because this is completely unacceptable:
    So I decided to upgrade my old dual 2.5GHz G5 with the dreaded AMD-8131 PCI chipset to one of the shiny new 8-core Mac Pros that were announced last week. Of course, this meant that I also had to upgrade my 2 UAD-1 cards to UAD-1e cards. The cards are installed in slots 3 & 4 - the PCI Express 2.0 slot is open. I have a project with the following plugin instance counts:
    4 Cambridge
    5 SPL Transient Designer
    1 Pultec Pro
    1 Precision Maximizer
    Would anyone have any idea why I would receive the "One or more Powered Plug-Ins have been disabled. CPU load limit exceeded" when opening the project on the new Mac Pro but not on the old G5? Both computers have 2GB ram. The old computer was running Tiger but the new one is running Leopard. I'm using Logic 8.0.1.
    The thing is, all the plugins appear to be loading. If I unload the Precision Maximizer, the reload it, I get the error message as soon as I select a preset. Again, in this case, the plugin seems to be loading.

Maybe you are looking for