New Evererst Build

New build contains drivers for 64 bit processors:
Get it here:
http://www.lavalys.hu/pre/everesthome/everesthome_build_0260.zip

Actually it will be from the Pocket and standard cinema camera which is 2k and 2.5k respectively. I was actually considering perhaps downgrading the GPU and going with the 4930k, but the need for the less common motherboards and increased price in ram made the cost go up a lot more than I would have thought. Would the performance be that much better? Looking at CPU benchmarks, the 4930k is only marginably better than the 4790k, although I assume with the extra 2 cores it does make a decent improvement.
EDIT: Here's a edit of that build using the 4930k. I also dowgraded the PSU as it seemed overpowered. This would increase my performance that significantly?
Intel Core i7-4930K, EVGA GeForce GTX 760, NZXT Phantom (Black/Green) - My Custom Build2 - usfsilverking's Saved Part Li…
CPU: Intel Core i7-4930K 3.4GHz 6-Core Processor ($569.99 @ NCIX US)
CPU Cooler: Cooler Master Seidon 240M 86.2 CFM Liquid CPU Cooler ($69.99 @ Newegg)
Motherboard: ASRock X79 Extreme6 ATX LGA2011 Motherboard ($213.99 @ SuperBiiz)
Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws X Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) DDR3-1600 Memory ($305.98 @ Newegg)
Storage: Toshiba 2TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive ($74.99 @ Micro Center)
Storage: Toshiba 2TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive ($74.99 @ Micro Center)
Video Card: EVGA GeForce GTX 760 2GB Video Card ($244.98 @ Newegg)
Case: NZXT Phantom (Black/Green) ATX Full Tower Case ($119.99 @ Amazon)
Power Supply: Corsair Builder 600W 80+ Bronze Certified ATX Power Supply ($64.99 @ Micro Center)
Total: $1739.89

Similar Messages

Found 2 bugs in new Flash Builder 4.7

Hello.
I've just migrated all of my large projects to the new Flash Builder 4.7 (from 4.6) and they all work well except for the 2 annoying issues:
1. I don't know why, but FB no longer allows me to create "config" packages. It says "config is a reserved word in ActionScript and cannot be used." Wtf? I had lots of projects using such names in FB 4.6 and didn't have any issues with it. Is it a new rule in FB 4.7? If so - then why it was introduced and was introduced only now? ActionScript language and FB exist not the first year... Also after i migrated existent projects i see all "config" packages have non-standard "folder" icon in the source file tree (in the package explorer panel).
2. There are strange warnings started to appear - "the import BLA-BLA-BLA is not used locally", but I am not blind - I see it is used just a little bit below in the code. What is wrong with this?
Please help as I am confused now about what to do... I waited for FB 4.7 for so long and now I think I will need to downgrade...

Hi Infeter,
For 1;
After the number of hours I have lost debugging issues where someone has inadvertently named a variable the same as a package that is on the root, so making it impossible for FB to discern whether I am talking about "aname.veryImportant" as the sub-package "veryImportant" of the package "aname" or the property "veryImportant" of the variable "aname", I welcome any and all new warnings of how a coder may inadvertently break Flash! So, if they are saying it is a reserved word, it is probably because there is a core class, variable or other such that will, at some point, bite you if you name something after it. This has always been the case with, for example "default" - default is a keyword that has real meaning for the compiler and you will not be allowed to define things as "default" because of the potential for confusion (are you issuing the "default" directive in a switch statement or are you referring to the "default" value in your class?). Given that FB has the frankly excellent "Refactor" function to allow you to easily rename packages, members and classes, I'd just be happy to rename the offending items and be glad to have saved myself several hours of painful debug later on.
For 2;
I'm surprised you're seeing this warning for classes that are not used. I've found loads that were added in automatically over the years that simply are not used. I'm loving the way I can clean out about half my import statements now. The thing to do is to comment out the imports and check that everything still works. If it does, then you're laughing, you don't need them. If it triggers errors of not being able to locate the class, then I would put together a code snippet and add it as a comment to your bug report.
G

Failed to Install The New Preview Build. Installation Failure: Windows failed to install the following update with error 0x80246007: FBL_AWESOME1501 9926 Professional.

Hello,
I'm having issues upgrading my Windows 10 Technical Preview installation build 9879 to a newer build that's become available late January 23rd.
I am installing the new upgrade in a Hyper-V virtual machine and get the following error:
Failed to install the new preview build, please try again later. 0x80246007
What could be the problem?
Previously I've had messages that Windows cannot be upgraded on a computer with less than 2 Gbyte of RAM. That's a Hyper-V VM with dynamic memory and I was highly surprised to see this error; never had this before. Had to set 2048 Mbytes as a minimum memory
for this VM. Now that I have this 80246007 error code.
When looking up System log, the following error messages are listed multiple times:
Installation Failure: Windows failed to install the following update with error 0x80246007: FBL_AWESOME1501 9926 Professional.
The errors are returned for the Event ID 20 by WindowsUpdateClient
in task category Windows Update Agent..
I reviewed the HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\WindowsSelfHost\Applicability
registry key as suggested in Windows
Insider stuck on build 9841 - "No new preview build was found", and here is what it shows:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\WindowsSelfHost\Applicability]
"BranchName"="fbl_awesome1501"
"ThresholdRiskLevel"="low"
"ThresholdOptedin"=dword:00000001
Note, when attempting to install the downloaded update from a native boot, installation starts with no errors.
However, since setup is not supported for a natively booted VHD files, it does not proceed further showing a message that installation on virtual drives is not supported.
Looks like Setup is having problems installing in a Hyper-V virtual machine.
Possibly, some ESD files got corrupted during downloading? Is it possible to remove them and re-download missing files? (I, however, noticed that Windows seems to re-download upgrade files after you restart 9879 and attempt to check for a new build.
Any clue why installing under VM causes 9926 to fail?
Thank you in advance.
Well this is the world we live in And these are the hands we're given...

Hi,
According to the error message, this problem seems like update package installation failed during system upgrade.
You can try to remove ESD file which locate at boot of C drive and upgrade the system again for test.
On the other hand, make sure the system 9879 installed all Windows pushed updates before system upgrade.
Roger Lu
TechNet Community Support

IWeb is not working for sending podcasts to iTunes, so I need a new web building tool. What is the closest thing to iWeb that I can use, which also supports podcasts?

iWeb is not working for sending podcasts to iTunes, so I need a new web building tool. What is the closest thing to iWeb that I can use, which also supports podcasts?

There's no reason you can't go on using iWeb for this - with iWeb '08 you have to publish to a local folder (i.e. on your Mac) and then upload the contents of the folder (not the folder itself) to your hosting service: and you have to make sure you enter the new URL in the Publish information or the feed won't work properly; this done, an iWeb podcast should work fine.
Of course there is still the problem that iWeb is not supported and sooner or later a system upgrade may break it. You could look at RapidWeaver: you can make podcasts with that, though the last time I looked into that - which was admittedly some time back - I didn't feel it was ideal for this. There are lots of other podcast creation programs or services around. WordPress is OK but it may be a bit of a steep learning curve: Libsyn is an online service that seems to work reliably. Blogger writes messy feeds but does usually work. Podcast Maker used to work well - I used it myself a few years back - but it rather looks as if it's gone moribund and it may not be reliable with Lion/Mountain Lion, so you would want to check into that.

"cs5.5 has stopped working" in new sytem build

(I mistakenly posted this in the general forum section- can I delete that post?)
When scrolling through a 50 minute long nested sequence containing 2 layers( one turned off ) of 1920x1080 AVC-Intra 100 P2, cs5.5 crashes. The source footage is on an external eSata Lacie Raid 0 drive.
I had many an issue like this back in cs4 days with continual crashing with large files but dont remember the solution. I have tried a few searches on this forum but cant seem to navigate the search engine to find anything... This is a brand new system build so I may not have win7 tweaked properly? Thank you for any suggestions.
Operating System
    MS Windows 7 64-bit SP1
CPU
    Intel Core i7 @ 3.50GHz    45 °C
    Sandy Bridge 32nm Technology
RAM
    32.0 GB Dual-Channel DDR3 @ 668MHz (9-9-9-24)
Motherboard
    Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. Z68XP-UD4 (Socket 1155)    34 °C
Graphics
    DELL 2405FPW (1920x1200@59Hz)
    Panasonic-TV (1920x1080@60Hz)
    2560MB GeForce GTX 570 (EVGA)    49 °C
Hard Drives
    147GB Western Digital WDC WD1500HLHX-01JJPV0 ATA Device (SATA)    28 °C
    625GB Western Digital WDC WD6401AALS-00L3B2 ATA Device (SATA)    33 °C
    625GB Western Digital WDC WD6401AALS-00L3B2 ATA Device (SATA)    36 °C
    313GB Western Digital WDC WD3200KS-00PFB0 ATA Device (SATA)    35 °C
    1954GB eSATA-2 LaCie 2BigQuadr SCSI Disk Device (SATA)
Optical Drives
    ATAPI iHAS124   B SCSI CdRom Device
Audio
    Realtek High Definition Audio

I deleted your other post.
I also made a change so that your problem.jpg shows on this page.

New folio builder panel

Since loading the new folio builder panel i am unable to load articles. Any help would be appreciated.

You can update the viewer builder panel independent from producer tools.
So you can stay on version 17 of the tools but you need the current folio
builder panel.
—Johannes
(mobil gesendet)
Am 31.01.2012 12:47 schrieb "BHPforum" <[email protected]>:
Update new Folio Builder Panel but not the Folio Producer Tools? created by
BHPforum <http://forums.adobe.com/people/BHPforum> in *Digital Publishing
Suite* - View the full discussion<http://forums.adobe.com/message/4175766#4175766>

Failed to install the new preview build, please try again later. 0xC1900107

I'm trying to upgrade Windows 10 TP for Enterprise to the new build 8460, but I keep getting the error message
Failed to install the new preview build, please try again later. 0xC1900107
I don't find any reference to that error code. I've seen similar reports in the forum, but with different error codes and with the message "Failed to upgrade" rather than "Failed to install". I haven't played with the reg keys on this
system.
The event viewer shows the following event:
Installation Failure: Windows failed to install the following update with error 0xC1900107: fbl_release 9860 Enterprise.
The upgrade to a non-Enterprise device started at the same time went through without problems.
Alberto

Hi Russell,
What’s the situation now?
There would be a cause that the upgrade is running background, so a retry would fail in this situation.
You can check the action log in C:\$Windows.~BT\source\panther\setupact.log
Check the time line to see if it is running for upgrade.
Alex Zhao
TechNet Community Support

Another new PC build for a hobbyist

Hi all, I've spent a couple of days searching around for recommendations on a new PC build and found a lot of good information on this forum. I'm replacing my home desktop, which is used for Premiere CS6 (family videos/enthusiast stuff - lately GoPro HD h.264 and some Canon 7D files) running on Windows 7 Pro x64. I'll be reusing some SATA drives but everything else is new. I realize that X79/i7-3930k provides far more performance, but mainly for budget reasons I think I'd prefer to stick with Ivy Bridge. Here's what I'm leaning towards:
CPU: Intel i7-3770k 3.5GHz (3.9GHz Turbo) Ivy Bridge
MB: Likely Asus P8Z77-V LK ATX
RAM: Probably CORSAIR Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 16Gb (or 32Gb) 2x8Gb (or 4x8Gb)
PSU: SeaSonic X-Series 1050W 80 Plus Gold (only $10 more than the 850W so why not)
CASE: Fractal Design Define R4
GPU: GTX 570 (likely this one: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127682)
DRIVES
     OS: 256Gb SSD (Crucial M4/Plextor 830)
     Media/Projects: RAID-0 2x 1Tb HD (reuse from old system)
     Previews/Cache/Exports: 2Tb 7200rpm HD
Add in misc DVD+RW, CPU cooler, etc. This prices out to ~$1,300 (without HD's but including the SSD) which is ok, little cheaper would be ok but couple of hundred more is fine too. I'm mostly undecided on the GPU, wondering if a GTX 660 is worth the $70 more (1344 vs. 480 CUDA cores and 2GB 192-bit GDDR5 vs 1280MB 320-bit GDDR5 for the GTX 660 vs GTX 570 respectively).
I'd really appreciate any thoughts on this build overall and suggestions on alternate components; thanks very much for all the information!

CPU - agree 3770K is a better choice as you have newer instruction sets, superior performance, lower power consumption and support for second generation of QuickSync offer hardware transcoding support.
Motherboard - The Deluxe is an outstanding board depending on how much you may really want the Marvell option you may want to consider the P8Z77-V Pro which also offers Thundebolt natively on the board. ( Although the Deluxe has a TB header in place for when the Thunderbolt EX expansion card is released ).
Additionally on both they offer a TPU switch which you can enable to have a easy 4.2 to 4.3GHz OC without any other interaction or adjustment.
CPU Cooler - I would advise something basic at least like a Hyper 212Plus or Hyper212 EVO. If you want to more cost effective the Hyper TX3 is very low cost and solid but not as effective at heat disipation.
PSU - Seasonic is excellent choice especially the X gold series very effiicent and the load performance is outstanding additionally generally any loads undder 25% will not have the fan spin at all helping to keep a very quiet system.
Chassis is a very solid option
GPU - I would consider GTX660Ti or the new GTX660 considerbly superior power efficiecy as well as there is hardware 4K econder support while not active it is there waiting for software applications to support. Additionally you have superior multi monitor flexibility up to 4 displays and it is quieter and cooler. Lastly performance is superior. I would consider ASUS GTX660 or GTX660TI DirectCU II.
SSD
Crucial drives have very solid firmware but write performance is not as strong ( this is relative overall a solid drive ). Depending on your write and read usage a different controller may make more sense.In this case you may want to consider a different SSD.
Corsair's new GS or GTX are very solid in the firmware development. If you will have a large amount of Incompressible data which includes certain types of TIF and PSD*, JPEG, video and sound files, ZIP files, etc. Then you may want to select a OCZ drive or a SSD based on a Marvell contrler or the new Corsair Neutron series. Those have the benefit of not taking a penelaty with incompressible data. With the overall price drops though on SSDs I would recommend 240GB especially as performance of the SSD will vary depending on capacity filled ( to a extent ). With that noted the Force GS and GTX which use SandForce have very strong performance for overall application usage.
Lastly depending on the maximum read and write speeds you may be better suite to use SSD Caching instead of the raid you are considering on the Marvell ports. Read speeds would be improved considerbly while writes would be stabilized but not overall extended
Hope this helps!

Consequences of new folio builder Panel.

I get the ticks, I'm in the midle of a huge production an now we get a new folio builder panel(12th of March), will that mean that I will have to update all viewers (I have got 9 countries) in order to read folios created with the new one ??
I Just updated all my viewers to support newsstand for free subscribtions (They are still pending for review)
Kind Regards
- Lars

Updating the viewer panel is mandatory but does not affect the types or
versions of folios you create.
When you update the producer tools (you can do wheneever you like) a new
version of the viewer is necessary, because of the new folio versions made
by the producer tools.
—Johannes
(mobil gesendet)

UPDATE: Install new Folio Builder panel

The Folio Producer tools on the web were updated July 21. Please update your Folio Builder panel to make sure that it's in sync with the web client. The links for downloading the 1.1.2 update will appear on the main DPS installer pages:
Mac OS: http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/product.jsp?product=172&platform=Macintosh
Windows: http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/product.jsp?product=172&platform=Windows
Note that there is a difference between installing the new Folio Builder panel and updating the authoring tools. Whenever there is an update to the web client, you should update the Folio Builder panel. However, when the new version of the authoring tools (Overlay Creator panel and plugin) becomes available, you have a choice of updating the authoring tools or continuing to use an older release. For example, you may want to continue using an older set of authoring tools so that you can continue to work on folios for a custom viewer that you created, and you don't want to update that viewer app in the store every time a set release comes out.
The v14 authoring tools will be available later, when all the viewers are approved in the stores. The new version of the Viewer Builder app is scheduled for release early next week. You'll be able to specify languages and use in-app billing for Android viewers.
When you update your Folio Builder panel, you will be able to do the following:
* Re-order articles in the Folio Builder panel by dragging and dropping
* Unshare folios with individuals
* Upload large articles (the limit increased from 100 MB to 2 GB)

OK, I've done this.
To test what's happening for sure, I have uninstalled and re-installed time and time again, step by step. Here's what I get:
1. install Digital Publishing Suite: I can sign in to Folio Builder
2. install patch 1.0.1: I can sign in to Folio Builder
3. install patch 1.1.1: I can sign in to Folio Builder
4. install patch 1.1.2: I cannot sign in to Folio Builder
Here are the messages I get when I try to sign in with 1.1.2. It's always one or the other, at random.
On my Mac at home, I can sign in without problem. Could it be a firewall issue with the Windows computers at the office? If the sign-in system has changed, please tell me what Adobe has done so that I can communicate this to our IT support.
In the meantime, I have downgraded to 1.1.1 so that I can continue working with DPS.
Ali

CC build from 7/3/2014 says under whats new "Latest build of Lightroom is now available to free members" Well I'm a free CC member and I'm not seeing a free LR version. can someone tell me where I can find it Free. All I see is Trial or BUY. Thanks For an

CC build from 7/3/2014 says under whats new "Latest build of Lightroom is now available to free members" Well I'm a free CC member and I'm not seeing a free LR version. can someone tell me where I can find it Free. All I see is Trial or BUY. Thanks For any help

Can't find what you are talking about, could you post a link.
I see the following.
Quote "Select any of the applications below to download a free trial. Or sign up for your free trial of Creative Cloud to get free access to all of these applications, mobile apps, web storage, and more."
Its all referring to trials.

Update new Folio Builder Panel but not the Folio Producer Tools?

Hi Guys
I was prompted to update the Builder Panel so I have done this now. I have read some older posts from last week about the new producer tools with new interactivity inside MSOs.
Is everybody still having problems with this update or has the bug been fixed now?
I'm not on such a tight deadline but I don't want any problems! Should I hold fire on updating the Producer tools?
Cheers
Gemma

You can update the viewer builder panel independent from producer tools.
So you can stay on version 17 of the tools but you need the current folio
builder panel.
—Johannes
(mobil gesendet)
Am 31.01.2012 12:47 schrieb "BHPforum" <[email protected]>:
Update new Folio Builder Panel but not the Folio Producer Tools? created by
BHPforum <http://forums.adobe.com/people/BHPforum> in *Digital Publishing
Suite* - View the full discussion<http://forums.adobe.com/message/4175766#4175766>

Failed to install the new preview build, please try again later. 0x80070032

Hello, I'm trying to update my Windows 10 to the new build and it's not possible in my computer.
In PC Settings\Preview Build I get this error as a result after trying to install the new update:
Failed to install the new preview build, please try again later. 0x80070032
EDIT: After trying the solution posted here: https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/66f82aff-9411-4c5f-a34f-e3172df32925/preview-build-failed-to-download-0x80246018?forum=WinPreview2014Setup
Now I have different error 0x80240024

Hi,
Did you find the error during downloading or installing process? Have you cleared the SoftwareDistribution folder and check the issue again?
It would be better if you can check the event viewer and windowsupdate.log (%windir%\Windowsupdate.log), find related information, upload the log to OneDrive for further analysis.
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-hk/onedrive/share-file-folder
Yolanda Zhu
TechNet Community Support

Failed to install the new preview build, please try again later 0xC1900204

I upgraded in-place from Windows 8.1 to Build 9926. I am unable to upgrade past 9926.
Windows Update finds the new preview build on both fast and slow rings. It downloads it successfully. Upon attempting to install, it fails.
I get a screen overlay with the message:
Can't update to Windows 10 Technical Preview
Sorry, it looks like this PC can't run Windows 10 Technical Preview. This might be because the Users or Program Files folder is being redirected to another partition.
Closing the overlay and returning to the "Update & recovery" screen, I see the error in red: Failed to install the new preview build, please try again later 0xC1900204

Hi Isilverman,
As we have Windows 10 install Media available at hand, might we consider to do a dual boot of Windows 10 and Windows 8.1?
Based on the information you posted, it seems to be that the current Windows 8.1 environment is not suitable to do an Upgrade.
Another thing I would like to share is the information listed in the thread below:
Problems with disk space and installation time in builds 10041
and 10049 of Windows 10 Technical Preview
Best regards
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

Failed to install the new preview build, please try again later. 0x80070003

I am currently running build 9841. When I try to install the new preview build I get the following error
Failed to install the new preview build, please try again later. 0x80070003
I have installed all updates and I am a full administrator of this machine. If someone could fix this I would be very happy.

Hi bgelbach,
Have you downloaded the 9879 build?
Before Windows setup runs, it would do some check on perquisites, one thing is space check.
When the new build is downloaded, it is located under C:\windows\software distribution\download
folder, which is about 2.7G. Make sure you have enough space for installation.
If everything goes well, it would extract files to C:\$WINDOWS.~BT folder.
Alex Zhao
TechNet Community Support

New Evererst Build

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for