New filter (KNVV-AUFSD) in CUSTOMER_MAIN Object (Middleware)

Hello,
I wanted to add field KNVV-AUFSD as filter in CUSTOMER_MAIN Adapter Object but I received an error message saying that I can not filter with this field.
I proceeded to add the field in tablas CRM: SMOFFILFLD and in R/3: CRMFILFLD.
In Object CUSTOMER_MAIN now I can add the filter but when I run the download (R3AS) and go to monitor (R3AM1) It is always yellow.
I can see that the queues in R/3 (SMQ1) and they are with status STOP.
Am I missing something to achieve this?
Best Regards

Hello,
I went to tx: SMW01 and I can see the BDOC in red status because a non existing value in field customer classification, is there any way to avoid this type of errors? I mean ... to deactivate the values validation?
Best Regards

Similar Messages

  • GWI: Add new filter criteria for replication object BUPA_MAIN

    Hello,
    we are currently setting up Groupware Integration with CRM 7.0 and Outlook Exchange 2007. We would like to filter the BPs that are replicated to Outlook's public folder. The replication object BUPA_MAIN in Tx. SMOEAC has only got the following criteria fields:
    BPARTNER
    CENTRALARCHIVINGFLAG
    COUNTRYISO
    INDUSTRY
    IS_COMPETITOR
    IS_CONSUMER
    IS_CUSTOMER
    IS_DELETED
    IS_PROSPECT
    PARTNEREXTERNAL
    REGION
    SEARCHTERM1
    SEARCHTERM2
    SITE_ID
    We don't want to use any of those but would like to set a filter on BP Role and filter for all Groupware Employees. Only those should be replicated.
    We did set the filter conditions in customizing under "Filter Condition for Business Partners Exchange with Groupware" in order to replicate only BP with role GWEMP but still during Initial Load all Business Partners were replicated.
    Could anyone tell me how to avoid this?
    I hear it's possible to add new criteria fields to the replication object BUPA_MAIN.
    Could anyone tell me how this is done?
    Your help will be much appreciated.
    Thanks in advance!
    Angela

    Hello Angela
    Usually the settings under "Filter Condition for Business Partners Exchange with Groupware" should be enough to avoid the synchronization. With those settings all BP are filtered out except the ones with role GWEMP (Groupware Employee).
    We have the following setting in SPRO:
    BUPA     1     BUP001           X     X     
    BUPA     1     BUP003           X     X     
    BUPA     2        X     X
    BUPA     3                     X     X
    (first column empty, second and third column with X, last column empty).
    Regards
    Marco

  • Equipment replication with new filter settings

    Hi all,
    ECC-CRM middleware settings are already in place. I then added status of the equipment as a new filter (Table-JEST, Field-STAT) as two lines (one for system status and one for user status) in R3AC1.
    Delta replication is happening fine.
    When i try to do initial load, no equipment is replciated for the filter settings maintained.
    In R3AM1, i see the block size as zero.
    Can someone help me on this?
    Regards,
    Gowri

    Hi Gowri,
       Have you found any solution for this? We are also having same requirement, if you found any solution kindly share.
    R3AC1 Question : How to add unallowed / non-standard filter settings?
    I have implemented this logic but CRM_EQUI_DMBDOC is processing successfully. I need to restrict the equipment object based on status. please share if you got any solution.
    Thanks,
    Vijay

  • PMS: Creation of new filter values

    Dear Reader,
    I am working on a PMS implementation where one particular appraisal template has multiple appraisers. The only way I can attach and identify between multiple appraisers is by creating new filters in table T77HAP_FLT_SEL.
    I plan to then use BADI implementations to help identify the persons for each filter value from OM relationships.
    But am at a loss as to how to create new filter values in this table. Would anybody be in a position to advise?
    Thanks in advance.
    Example scenario:
    Every appraisee has three appraisers: MANAGER, BUSINESS AREA GENERAL MANAGER (BAGM) and DOTTED-LINE MANAGER (DLM). There is no unified logic in the existing OM structure to identify the BAGM other than to create a custom relationship between all child org units and the position of the BAGM.
    I need to name all three participants as appraisers in the appraisal category - but the only way I can name multiple persons as appraiser is to provide a selection ID at the category level (the selection ID being the filter value picked up from table T77HAP_FLT_SEL). For this, I would need to create values for BAGM and DLM in T77HAP_FLT_SEL so that I can pick them up when configuring my category.

    Thanks Dilek,
    That was the first thing I had tried. However, there is no maintenance dialog for T77HAP_FLT_SEL in transaction SM30 - the error says no maintenance objects exist for this table/view.
    From my research so far, it looks like the selection ID/filter value is picked up by BADI HRHAP00_SELECTION. But am not sure if the same BADI is used to populate new values in this table or not.

  • How to Add a New Filter Value in BEx WAD to Display All Result

    Hi experts,
    I want to add a new filter value in BEx WAD to display all data records. The scenario is as follows:
    The status field can have two values: Active ("A) and Inactive ("I").
    But the requirement is to have a third value to display all the data records (Active + Inactive). E.g. the value can be "G". The purpose is to increase the understandability for report users.
    Does anyone have an idea?
    Regards,
    Joon

    Hi Vineet,
    thanks for your reply. The problem is that there are only 2 values available for this Characteristic: "A" or "I".
    The requirement is to have a third value "G" (instead of the default "All Value") due to historical reason, because all future report users have been working with R/3 reports for quite some time and they are accustomed to using "G" for displaying all values.
    Is there any possibility to realize this?
    Thanks,
    Joon

  • Interactive Report uncheck Filter when adding new filter

    Is there any possibliity to uncheck all Filters which are already defined in a interactive report when a new filter will be created?
    My first approach started by adding a dynamic action which is related to the search field:
    event = key_down
    jQuery Selector = #apexir_SEARCH
    event Scope = live
    The Action contains:
    $('input:checkbox').attr('checked', false);
    There are 2 problems at the moment:
    1. When the user hits "go" or "enter" the checkbox are checked again when the result is shown
    2. If a filter is defined where the search field is not used, it doesn't work

    Hi Oliver,
    too much hassle I think. You can try to hijack any POST message, analyze it, and if it's about p_widget_action=FILTER you'd stop the action and interfere with an AJAX call to APEX_UTIL.IR_FILTER or IR_RESET. After the AJAX request has returnd (synchronously), you can fire the original POST again which sets the new filter.
    Hmm. Sounds to me like you'd better ask the client if he is willing to pay for that sort of convenience.
    Greetings from Northern Germany,
    Andreas

  • Why can't we have Camera Raw 8.5 open as an external editor in Lightroom 5 to allow using the new filter brush

    ARC 8.5 has a new filter brush for the graduated filter which will allow deleting areas from the applied area - why/how can ACR 8.5 be set as a external editor to allow access to this ability???  . Or when will Lightroom be upgraded to have this feature?
    Thanks

    ACR 8.5 is a plug-in for Photoshop not a standalone program.  I’d suggest doing an Edit In Photoshop CC/2014 and then using Filter / Camera Raw in PS to do your edits.
    I would also LR will be upgraded at some point, but maybe not until 6.0.  It’s hard to say, since the LR folks are having to deal with LR mobile things, now, too, PS is part of the cloud, and a promise of the cloud is to get new functionality sooner.

  • Inbound Queue - new filter

    Hi, i'm trying to create a new filter for an Inbound Queue using as reference the document <b>HowTo_prioritizeXImessages.pdf</b>.
    As I follow the document point by point, and after created a new Sender/ReceiverID for my Service (Epiphany) and choose as Message Category - Request the wild card (*) both for Interface Name/Interface Namespace, next I add a new filter for the IS Inbound Exactly Once for my SenderID created before.
    Using the functionallity Enter Test Message and after enter the value in the required fields the result turns me an error message as follows : <i><b>No filter found for your test message</b></i>.
    Can anyone help me regarding this question ??
    Thanks
    JMatos

    Hi, José,
    when you configure your sender and receiver id, enter your receiver interface and namespace into the message category instead of leaving it empty.
    Regards
    Cornelius

  • Unable to load new filter, get error message

    Hello.  I have been using Pixel Bender for several months without a problem.  I am running CS5 64bit.  Today, I tried to add a new filter skinColorFilter and I get an error that NewFilter already exists and cannot be added.  I looked in the Pixel Bender Files folder and no such filter exists.  This is a link to the screen image of the error I am getting;  .
      I am able to continue and use all the other filters and do see a NewFilter listed but have no idea where it came from.  Any ideas what I can do to resolve this problem...........Ralph

    Hello, and thank you for responding.  The problem is that there is no NewFilter in the Pixel Bender directory and in fact there is no such file in my entire disk.  My first reaction was to delete the filter but couldn't do so as it didn't exist.  I have since downloaded other filters that work fine so have decided to give up and live without the skinColorFilter.
    Again, thank you for your suggestion.............Ralph

  • LR3: New filter behaviour conflicts with quick collection

    Going to the Quick collection (Ctrl +B) resets the filters, so when returning back to where I was before (Ctrl + B again), I don't see the same view.
    This cannot be avoided with locking the filters -> then the filters are used for the Quick colelction and often I see nothing in there or only some of the photos. So, could the Quick collection be an exception to the new filter resetting behaviour? (i.e. separate filters for QC? Or no filters for QC?)
    Thanks,
    Vit

    Hi,
    The LR Print Module is working as it was designed to work - the Custom Package option will allow you to perform the actions that you require, but not automatically.
    Why not place your request for added funtionality (i.e. add an option to allow automatic population of the Custom Print Package layout) on the Feature Request forum below;
    http://forums.adobe.com/community/lightroom/lightroom_feature_requests?view=discussions

  • New Filter Idea

    I had an idea for a new filter. There is the drop shadow, the
    bevel, the glow, etc. I thought it would be really cool to have an
    extrusion filter. It would be really nice for text, or really
    anything. Just to make it look like it is extruded. Could the FL
    people do that? Good idea?

    Personally I wouldn't have much use for it. But if you want
    to make suggestions for the software, this forum isn't the place to
    do it. It's a user forum which is not (officially at least) viewed
    by anyone from Adobe. Instead go here:
    Adobe
    Feature Request form

  • Transaction F-20: define a new filter field

    Hi Gurus...
    Does someone know if it possible to define a new filter in transaction F-20.
    I need to filter data (bill liability) also by PAYMENT METHOD. The dynpro in which I would this situation is SAPMF05A - Screen number 0102.
    Is there a standard way to realize this, or I have to create via ABAP a copy of F-20?
    Thank in advance,
    Marco Vismara
    null

    There's no way to customize this transaction.

  • New filter on KNVV-LOEVM (Deletion Flag)

    Hello,
    I wanted to add field KNVV-LOEVM as filter in CUSTOMER_MAIN Adapter Object.
    For now I have only VKORG, VTWEG and SPART from KNVV in CUSTOMER_MAIN (standard). 
    How can I add new Fields to filter in CUSTOMER_MAIN
    Best Regards

    Please take a look at this post for good information on usage of KNVV-LOEVM
    How to find BPs marked for deletion in ECC at CRM side ?
    Thanks
    Bhaskar

  • How to add a new filter in an existing web service method (BIWS - WEBI document)

    Hello Experts, we have 7 web service query's connected to a dashboard. Basically it is one WSDL URL and 7 Get Methods...Web service queries are BIWS (via WEBI document instance). There are filters setup for each of these web service methods.
    Recently there was a request to add 2 new fields to the webi document and also the 2 fields need to be included as filters in the 7 methods. I know there is an option to edit the method, but when i edit the method, i cannot find the 2 new fields in list to set as filters.Can anybody help me understand how to add filters to an existiing web service method? I do not want to delete the method and republish the block as web service.
    Any help will be great and points rewarded.
    Thank you
    Ann

    Hi Ann,
    The reason you are not able to see any of the new columns as a option to select in your web service block is because when you have published that block, they were not present. Add these two new objects in your block and publish it again. You will be prompted for duplication content. Select the highlighted block for duplicate and now you can see the new added objects in the filter option. Update and this will overwrite your published block. Please note, web services do appear to behave weirdly when used with dashboards so I request you to please try it in a separate test report first.
    Hope that helps.
    Regards,
    Tanisha

  • Problem in down loading CUSTOMER_MAIN object

    Hi Experts
    we have done filter settings to download single customer master from ECC 6.0 toCRM 5.0.
    After intial load,  the object CUSTOMER_MAIN still in running status for a long time in R3AM1.
    Please help us how to resolve this
    Thanks & regards
    Vikram Gopal

    Hi,
    Note 788822 - Filtering does not work
    would surely solve your probs...
    Best Regards,
    Pratik Patel
    <b>Reward with Points!</b>

Maybe you are looking for