New G/L in ECC 6.0
HI Friends,
can any one tell me what is the difference between normal G/L in 4.7EE and new G/L in ECC 6.0.
Thanks in Advance
RK
Hi,
Check out at
http://www.sap.com/solutions/business-suite/erp/financials/pdf/BWP_New_Gen_Ledger_Acct_Functions.pdf
Bye
Kayan
Similar Messages
-
Kanban issue - Setting for new Kanban functionality in ECC 6.0
Hi, I am facing a problem while recieving stock from a production order. The system does not create a transfer requirement or a TO.
Let me give you a brief background.
This is a new functionality introduced in ECC 6.0 for working with kanban in WM.
Supply area is created for WM location.
Control cycle is created for material, supply area. Warehouse, storage type and Bin is maintained in control cycle record. When the GR is done for production order material is recieved in this bin.
1) Now when the Kanban is set empty a production order is automatically created.
2) Once the production order is confirmed the material automatically shows up in the bin.
A material document is created which shows IM movement type 101 and WM movement type 103. Also in material document Immediate auto TO checkmark is blank.
3) PROBLEM - System does not create a TR or a TO. the material automatically shows up in the Bin. How can we enable an auto TR and TO creation.
Following are the settings which I have already checked:
1) In IMG, WM movement type 103 has auto TO indicator set.
2) IM-WM interface for 102 movement type and 103 movement type is maintained.
The main problem is: Although the material document displays WM movement type 103 and the stock lies in WM bin, System never created a Transfer requirement or a Transfer order.
I would really appreciate if anyone can help me in this.
ThanksHello,
I am not sure about your settings, please refer below sap link
[Kanban Replenishment |http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/95/e81fa4f57011d194aa0000e83dcfd4/content.htm]
Regards
Pradeep Kumar -
Wht r the advantages of New debugger in the ECC versions
Hi,
What r the advantages of the New debugger in the ECC verssions.
Thanks,
SrikHi,
In ther ECC versions in the program menu there are 2 buttons for: set/delete session breakpoint and set/delete External break point.
Refer to this thread
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/c6/617ca9e68c11d2b2ab080009b43351/content.htm
Debugging
Check these documents.
http://www.cba.nau.edu/haney-j/CIS497/Assignments/Debugging.doc
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/5a/4ed93f130f9215e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/c6/617ca9e68c11d2b2ab080009b43351/content.htm
http://www.cba.nau.edu/haney-j/CIS497/Assignments/Debugging.doc
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/b3/d322540c3beb4ba53795784eebb680/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/84/1f624f4505144199e3d570cf7a9225/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_bw30b/helpdata/en/c6/617ca9e68c11d2b2ab080009b43351/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/b3/d322540c3beb4ba53795784eebb680/frameset.htm
ABAP Debugging
http://www.saplinks.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=24&Itemid=34
Look at the SAP help link below
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/c6/617ca9e68c11d2b2ab080009b43351/content.htm
reward if useful
regards,
ANJI -
New GL Accounting in ECC 6.00
Hi all,
we activated new GL accounting in ECC 6.00 for our customer.
as per new GL Accounting sap replaced tables GLT0, GLPCT, GLFUNCT by FAGLFXT (updated records in all these tables) and
GLPCP(updated) by FAGLEXP(not updated) and
GLPCA(updated) by FAGLEXA(not updated).
can anyone suggest me how to deactivate tables GLT0, GLPCT, GLFUNCT, GLPCP and GLPCA and also how to activate FAGLEXP and FAGLEXA.
please adice me how to do this.
regards,
pranav.Hi,
Please see note 1070629 - FAQs: New General Ledger Migration
https://websmp204.sap-ag.de/~form/handler?_APP=01100107900000000342&_EVENT=REDIR&_NNUM=1070629&_NLANG=E
Extract :
77. How can I deactivate classic Profit Center Accounting (EC-PCA) after activating the new General Ledger?
Note 702854 explains how to deactivate classic Profit Center Accounting.
If you use document splitting for profit centers in ERP2004, delete the dummy profit center from the table TKA01 also. For this purpose, Note 702854 provides the program Z30PCA23. Use the program Z30PCA23 to delete the dummy profit center of classic Profit Center Accounting in the controlling area.
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
Gimmo -
How to Materials has to be extended to new company code from ecc to crm
Hi ,
Please guide me how to Materials has to be extended to new company code from ecc to crm , step by step.
How to assign the pricing procedure from ecc to crm , step by step.
How to maintain the pricing conditions in crm , step by step.
Your answers will be appreciated in advance.
Thanks
MohmusPlease use select all button in the top of the screen and click on copy button, here you have to change the company code.
That's it.
Rgds
Murali. N -
New BADI concept in ECC 6.0
I am trying to gain an understanding of how I would implement one of the new BADIs in ECC 6.0 (badis implmented through and enhancement spot , get badi, call badi concept).
I am not looking for information on how to implement a classic badi through se18/se19.
I have also ready through the SAP help on the new badis and it is still not clear to me. So, please do not provide links to the standard SAP help. I have that.
I am wondering if anybody has a whitepaper, example, etc. that explains the details of how to implement, use, trigger the new badis linked to an enhancement spot.Hi J.J,
enhancement spot
A repository object for the administration of explicitly created enhancement options. Enhancement spots are components of a tree structure hierarchy, of which the branches represent composite enhancement spots and the leaves are simple enhancement spots. Implicitly available enhancement options do not have any enhancement spots.
composite enhancement spot
Semantic combination of simple and other composite enhancement spots with the aim of providing structure.
simple enhancement spot
Reference to a set of enhancement spot element definitions. A simple enhancement spot can occur independently or as a component of a composite enhancement spot.
ENHANCEMENT-POINT
Defines a position in an ABAP program as an enhancement option,
at which one or more source code plug-ins can be inserted.
the syntax will be like
ENHANCEMENT-POINT enh_id SPOTS spot1 spot2 ...
STATIC
INCLUDE BOUND.
Enhancement Options
Definition
Enhancement options are positions in Repository objects where enhancements can be made. These options are either explicitly defined (by the developer) or exist implicitly. Explicit enhancement options are generally defined in a central initial system. Enhancements are made in follow-on systems.
Use
Explicit enhancement options can currently be defined by:
1. Explicitly flagging source code points or sections in ABAP programs. For an enhancement, these can be enhanced or replaced by source code plug-ins.
2. Including Business Add-Ins (BAdIs) in ABAP programs. These programs are then enhanced by object plug-ins with predefined interfaces.
Explicit enhancement options are managed by enhancement spots and enhanced by enhancement implementations.
Currently, implicit enhancement options are:
1. Specific options in ABAP programs such as the end of the program which can be enhanced by source code plug-ins.
2. Parameter interfaces of function modules, which can be enhanced with parameters.
3. Attributes and parameter interfaces of global classes, which can be enhanced with attributes or parameters.
Implicit enhancement options always exist and do not require enhancement spots. They are also enhanced by enhancement implementations.
BAdIs Embedded in the Enhancement Concept
Use
The definition of BAdIs is managed by enhancement spots. A simple enhancement spot for BAdIs can contain several BAdI definitions as enhancement spot element definitions. BAdIs that would otherwise be spread out in the system can be grouped together semantically.
This structuring is mirrored on the implementation side through the enhancement implementations. A BAdI can be implemented by several BAdI implementations that are managed by enhancement implementations. A simple enhancement implementation for object plug-ins can contain several BAdI implementations of an enhancement spot as enhancement implementation elements and can implement a BAdI multiple times. Therefore, several enhancement implementations can be assigned to one enhancement spot.
A BAdI is always assigned to the same package, like the enhancement spot, to which it belongs.
Example
The structuring features of BAdIs in enhancement spots can be of a technical or a subject nature.
If, in the definition of several BAdIs, you have the provision that they are to be used in the same context (this is a feature known only by the person who defines the BAdIs), they must be used by the same simple enhancement spot.
From a subject point of view, all BAdIs must then be grouped together by affiliation to functional units for example, payroll in combined enhancement spots.
Thanks and regards
suma sailaja pvn -
New feature BD87 in ECC 6.0 ?
Hi,
In the first screen of BD87 that you see with all your idocs we see message: "Could not find soldto belonging to &"
I we double-click on the message, it give several idocs with the same error, but only then the & has the correct value filled in.
Is this a new feature of the BD87 in ECC 6.0 ? That is't maybe grouping on messages to get a better overview ?
Thanks !Dear Soniya,
Release Info:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/43/68805bb88f297ee10000000a422035/frameset.htm
http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/ Give source and target versions.
Regards,
Naveen. -
Adding new fields in SAP ECC 6.0
Hi All,
I have a requirement to add a couple of fields at the item level of ERP Quotation. I would like to know if SAP ECC 6.0 have some tools like EEWB/AET in SAP CRM.
Please suggest a solution..
Any Help/Hint highly appreciated,
Thanks, Sudeep..Can you please check closely, I actually see 7 more fields in ESSL table in ECC6.0 (108 fields) than in ECC5.0 (101 fields).
Can you list down which fields you are looking for that you think are missing?
I have checked ESLL_PLUS, it seems to be the same in ECC 5.0 and ECC 6.0..
There are two new structures in ECC6.0 ESLL_PEROP_STY and OILESLLDATA which doesnt exist in ECC5.0
Also if you just upgraded recently to ECC 6.0 check SPDD logs.
Also check out SWITCH framework, ESLL_PLUS (ESLL_BOS) may be linked to some new frame work that you did not SWITCH ON... Just a thought.
-- SMA
Edited by: S M A on Oct 19, 2010 10:21 PM -
Report on New vendor transfer from ECC to GTS
Hi we have run the batch job daily basis to transfer new vendors from ECC to GTS system, my client want to know that list of the venodors(Business Partners) has been transfered today in GTS system on particular day to screening SPL. where i can see this, or any possible solution saying that get mail notification to users - once vendors are transfered based on job batch runs.
regards
SatishSatish,
You can see the log in System Monitoring > Transfer logs for business partners or by executing the transaction: /SAPSLL/PARTNER_APPL.
However in order to see the required logs, you need to configure the u2018Control Profile for Loggingu2019 in IMG.
Hope this helps. -
Copy PO order in SRM not replicating new net price in ECC (SAP SRM 7.0 )
Hello - I'm in SRM 7.0 SRM Server 701 level 4 and ECC 6.0
I I'm copying an already order PO from POWL (copy), I change the Gross Price in SRM from X to Y and I order the new PO. I go to ME23n in ECC and the NET_PRICE value on the PO is still X even that in SRM is Y.
So I go to SE37 in SRM and execute BBP_PD_PO_TRANSFER_EXEC_V2, when I step in I can see that the value in the PO in SRM is Y and in ECC is Y. When I check me23n again now the value in ECC is Y.
If I don't debug the value never updates. Any ideas what could be causing the NET_PRICE not to update. Also if I add other lines item the net_price always update to the new lines item. It is like a buffer issue but how come when I debug it is working but when I order from NWBC it doesn't update?
any ideas?
thanks!
Jason PVRZ20 errors:
Local Errors: Business to Business Procurement(600)
Error reading export data for EXEC transfer of purchase order
Error in local purchase order; no update of references in EXEC system
Backend Errors:
PO 3000000051: No instance of object type PurchaseOrder has been created. External reference:
Purchase order 3000000051: Document contains no items
Purchase order 3000000051: Transfer Failed; Resubmit
Since we are in SRM 7.0 ECC 6.04 Ehp 4, with PI 7.11 + ROS and no SUS.
doent the system uses ESOA Service for PO replication.
We did CCTR / CPPR scenarios too. Both are sucessful.
Do we need to impl BADI PUR_SE_PO_INTERFACE_OUT_SELECT
But thats for Service hierarchy and Service POs - We dont have Service hierarchy or SUS in our SLD.
IF PO replication also uses PI, what configuration do i need to do? -
New Extractors GL with ECC 6.0
All,
Currently we have ECC 5.0 system and we have 0FI_GL_10 extractor providing us the reports based on P&L and Balance Sheet. The major issue with it is that it brings in 51 times the number of records because we have 16 periods and 3 currencies.
We are planning on upgrading ECC system in near future. We want to have our GL base reports coming out of the new extractors. I have heard that the new extractors make it much better with ECC 6.0. We have our blance sheet and Detailed P&L reports coming out of current extractor.
Can anyone who has implemented new extractor help on explaining which new extractor can best replace this functionality?
Thanks in advance.Hi,
Go through the links
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/e2/f16940c3c7bf49e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/29/830e405c538f5ce10000000a155106/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/e6/f16940c3c7bf49e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
Re: New GL cubes 0FIGL_V10, 0FIGL_V11
Note 1070629 - FAQs: New General Ledger Migration
Cost Elements:Cost Element ( KSTAR ) should be available in the extract structure ( FAGL_EXTSTRUCT_LEAD ) of 0FI_GL_10.Append the structure to get cost element, activate , uncheck the hidden tab.
Features of the Extractor
Extraction method: F1 (function module (complete interface))
Extractor: FAGL_GET_TT_DATA_LEAD
Extraction structure: FAGL_EXTSTRUCT_LEAD
If you include your own fields in the totals table of the new General Ledger using transaction FAGL_GINS, these fields are not included in the extraction automatically. You first have to include them under the same name in an APPEND to extraction structure FAGL_EXTSTRUCT_LEAD. The fields of the APPEND structure are then filled automatically.
Santosh -
New General Activation in ECC 6.0
Hi
We are using ECC 6.0 and New General Ledger is not activated.
What is the purpose of activating New General Ledger?
Regards
JaiHi Jai,
If your client wants to use new-gl functionality like segments,document splitting,pca in new-gl then you have to activate it..
thanks,
sai. -
New Tr.Code In ECC 6.0
Hi All.
Please let me know the new transaction codes added in ECC 6.0
Treat it as most urgent.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
SyedDear Soniya,
Release Info:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/43/68805bb88f297ee10000000a422035/frameset.htm
http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/ Give source and target versions.
Regards,
Naveen. -
No Business Partner generated for new employee transfer from ECC to SRM
Hi All,
I am working on SRM 5.0 with ECC 6.0 backend. The HR structure is replicated from ECC using ALE, message type:HRMD_ABA.
When I am trying to replicate a new employee from ECC to SRM, I run the O-insert first, then the S-insert and then the P-insert using PFAL transaction.
The Org structure was already in place in SRM, so it just adds the new position to it by A003 relation. The S-insert generated idoc shows status as '53' in both ECC and SRT with the relation A003, B007 and A008. But, when I check the table HRP1001, the A008 entry is missing. Due to this, no CP is generated for this position and also no business partner is generated for this user.
When I run the P-insert for this employee, the idoc is posted in ECC. But, the status of the idoc in SRT is '52' and the message shown is "The Parameter Country Has Not been Entered During Naming Format Check" Message No. R11206.
I checked the Name Format for this employee, and it is maintained as 2.
Where am I going wrong? Why is no CP person generated even when the idoc status is 53? Why isn't the new employee getting transferred to SRM server?
I have checked the SAP notes related to HR-ECC Org transfer, but I am unable to figure out the reason for this problem.
Could anyone help me out in this?
Regards,
AncyMaintained the name format tables (SA13)on ECC and SRM side.
-
Create New Info Block in ECC for CRM Customer Fact Sheet
Hi,
we have a requirement to add a new info block in Customer Fact Sheet to display Equipment master from ECC. the info block required somehow is not listed in standard ECC info block.
is there any way i can configure the info block in ECC so i can call it from CRM? or do i need to develop it using ABAP in ECC?
thanks in advanceWhat I really really need is an example of how a new Assignment block can be created so that it appears in the PDF fact sheet.
I'm aware that the interface within the Smartform will need to be changed, along with the coding to process any new data being parsed in. The copied class, now called ZCL_UIU_PRN_ACCOUNT has a method called Collect_data which populates the itabs and forwards to the appropriate Smartform. I'm currently looking through this code to see what needs to be done.
The collect_data method loops through the data in the CRMT_BSP_PRINT table and retrieves the data structure and class, and I assume it calls them, but I have no idea what these classes have in common as I can't see common theme with them.
The data sources are:
CRMT_BSP_ACTIVITY2_BP
COMT_BSP_BP_ADDRESS
CRMT_BSP_CONTACT_OBJ_BP
CRMT_BSP_INT_HISTORY_BP
CRMT_BSP_OPPORTUNITY_BP
CRMT_BSP_ACC_R3_FACT_SHEET
CRMT_BSP_ACC_RELATION
CRMT_BSP_SALES_AREA_BP
and their associated class/interface is:
CL_BSP_ACC_ACCMOD_ACTIVITY
CL_BSP_BP_ACCMOD_ADDR_MIX
CL_BSP_ACC_ACCMOD_CONTACT
CL_BSP_ACC_ACCMOD_INT_HISTORY
CL_BSP_ACC_ACCMOD_OPPORTUNITY
CL_BSP_ACC_ACCMOD_PRN_R3DATA
CL_BSP_ACC_ACCMOD_RELATIONS
CL_BSP_ACC_ACCMOD_SALES_AREA
It would look like a lot of these classes are based on CL_BSP_*ACCMOD classes, but that's guesswork on my part.
I am unhappy that I seem to be pioneering here as there's no guide/help on exactly what needs to be done to add new AB's/sections to the PDF fact sheet. I find that strange as most areas are well documented, except this area as far as I know.
Sure, there is a note which identifies some of the objects that need to be changed, but misses out a vital table, but there are no guides. There are many people who produce videos on how to achieve the easier stuff, like adding fields to AB's via the UI configurator, but there seems to nothing in the area of extending the PDF fact sheet.
Jas
Edited by: Jason Stratham on Apr 29, 2010 10:22 AM
Maybe you are looking for
-
We are running Windows 8.1 Pro x86 I am really curious as to why the drive restriction group policy causes the error message to pop up: "This operation has been cancelled due to restrictions in effect on this computer. Please contact your system admi
-
How do I make one window progress to another in swing
Ive got to design a simple quizgame interface using Swing. Its got to have a player's front-end - gives a selection of questions where the user selects one of five answers, a scoring front-end - displayed after game that allows user to enter their na
-
After upgrading to Mavericks I can no longer drag an app from one desktop to another.
On Mountain Lion I could move apps from one desktop to the other by simple dragging them to the right which would transition to the next desktop. Now the only way I can do it is to use mission control. Anyone else seeing this?
-
How do I determine a message was sent by a proxy user?
Any ideas? I looked through the object, but could not find reference to the proxy user. Is there somewhere in the message object that says that the message was sent by a proxy user? Thanks Andrew
-
Hello, Is it not that the port name in SAP XI and the RFC destination in R/3 of type 3 be of the same name, like SAP(r/3 SID) ? Also, the RFC destination mentioned in the idx1, in XI, isnt that the same name as mentioned in the XI - sm59 R/3 destinat