New GL implementation impact

Dear All
We are going to implement New GL in our ECC system .
In our existing system landscape we have profit center and GL reporting based on extractors 0EC_PCA_1& 0EC_PCA_2
My question is if post New GL implementation we can still use the existing extractors or we need to switch to new extractors to maintain the current
reporting in BW ?
Thanks
Ankush

Suyash
You are correct . I did some more analysis on my side and 0EC_PCA_1& 0EC_PCA_2 are fetching data from GLPCA /GLPCT tables which will become obsolete after new GL implementation . So we would need to use one of the below extractos to replace the existing ones ( PCA extractors )
0FI_GL_10
0FI_GL_14
Regards
Ankush

Similar Messages

How to register new interface implementation?

Hi,
I have the following problem:
There exists a self written webdynpro application. This application uses a Java Interface. The administrator of the application can add new functionality to the application by adding a new line to a table. He inserts the name of a class which implements that Java interface. This class has the new functionality.
For each interface implementation the user of the webdynpro gets a value into a list. He can select an entry from this list. This value tells to the application that it has to create an object from the related java interface implementation.
Now I wonder how I can tell to the webdynpro application that it knows all interface implementations which will come in the future? If I do not "register" or reference the new interface implementations, then I think the webdynpro application has ClassNotFound errors.
The developers should make there own projects for each interface implementation an deploy them. But what must be done, that the webdynpro application knows them?
Can you please give me some suggestions?
Thank you and best regards,
Marcus

You can register a Mac, but not an accessory like the Time Capsule. Keep a copy of your sales receipt.....just in case.

New to Implementation

Hi Experts,
I new to implementation project. Project is ready to start here the existing no system for client. We have to build the SAP BI system to them. R/3 is in process BI is going to start. Can Please any body guide me What are the reports we have to show in demo to them based on that we have to gather the requirement from them. we have SD,FI,MM,QM,PM,PP,HR modules to implement.
Please guide me....

Hi,
Check the below link which provides all the business content info like , IOs, ICs, DSOs, Data sources used and the standard Bi content reports...
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp2/helpdata/en/6a/f247bf0ce745eab5648a309fbd784e/frameset.htm
Here in the link you have BI Content -click on it - here it will displays all the BI content related all modules...
[sales N Distribution|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_tm80/helpdata/en/f0/3baf6718d2427a94ced005f298be06/frameset.htm]
Condition Rate Deviation (Sales Order and Billing Document)
Condition Amount (Billing Document Document: Condition Amount (Sales Order)] Condition Amount (Sales Order)
Document: Condition Amount By Customer] Condition Amount By Customer
Document: Average Delivery Processing Times] Average Delivery Processing Times
Document: Billing Documents] Billing Documents
Document: Deliveries] Deliveries
Document: Delivery Delays per Sales Area] Delivery Delays per Sales Area
Document: Delivery Delays per Sold-to Party] Delivery Delays per Sold-to Party
Document: Distribution Channel Analysis] Distribution Channel Analysis
Document: Faultless Sales Order Processing] Faultless Sales Order Processing
Document: Fulfillment Rates] Fulfillment Rates
Document: Fulfillment Rates: Values] Fulfillment Rates: Values
Check the below links for FI
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp2/helpdata/en/65/7beb3cad744026e10000000a11405a/frameset.htm
General Ledger
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp2/helpdata/en/57/dd153c4eb5d82ce10000000a114084/frameset.htm
[Asset Accounting|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_bic735/helpdata/en/a8/f4153c4eb5d82ce10000000a114084/frameset.htm]
Etc
All HR related
help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp2/helpdata/en/2a/77eb3cad744026e10000000a11405a/frameset.htm

Allowing a new sensor implementation to learn

Hi,
I'm setting up a new IPS sensor on an ASA 5500.
I've heard a recommendation that for a new sensor implementation at a given site, it is better to allow the sensor to learn traffic patterns in promiscous mode before deploying inline mode, otherwise the sensor may not interpret certain events correctly.
Is that a valid statement, and if so, does that mean you must wait to deploy any particular policies until this learning is complete?
Thanks.

Let me explain my point of view:
The sensor in question is an AIP-SSM, so the traffic is normalized by the firewall. In this setup there is no difference in the detection capabilities between promiscous and inline. Promiscous mode has problems with traffic that the attacker has fragmented in an abnormal way or modified segments. Both are controlled by the ASA and don't show up at the sensor.
So the signatures will behave the same. Now you want to make sure that you don't lose traffic while you are stil in the phase of minimizing or eliminating your false polsitives. You could filter out the deny-actions, but as a human you could make a mistake there and you configure something that has to be reconfigured later when your first tuning-phase is over. Both is not a problem when you observe your sensor in promiscous-mode. The change to inline is then very easy and your sensor doesn't need to be changed any more.
For your promiscous delta: The PD has nothing to do how or if a signature triggers or how the signature behaves. It is only a modifier for your Risk-Rating that helps you to make better decisions when you are at your monitoring-console, have thousands of alarms and have to decide which to process first.
Don't stop after you've improved your network! Improve the world by lending money to the working poor:
http://www.kiva.org/invitedby/karsteni

Methodology or Process Documents for new XI implementations

Hi All,
Can someone point me to any docs on Process/Methodology new XI implementations.
Thanks & Regards,
Nandini

Nandini,
Please refer the below thread and look for the URL I gave over there
Re: XI template documents
Best regards,
raj.

[svn] 1191: ASC side of the new vector implementation .

Revision: 1191
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-04-11 07:56:10 -0700 (Fri, 11 Apr 2008)
Log Message:
ASC side of the new vector implementation . Strict mode checking now works for all vector types.
ASC test, tamarin tests, and flex checkintests pass
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/abc/AbcParser.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/embedding/LintEvaluator.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/embedding/avmplus/ActionBlockConstants .java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/embedding/avmplus/ActionBlockEmitter.j ava
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/embedding/avmplus/ByteCodeFactory.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/embedding/avmplus/GlobalBuilder.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/parser/Evaluator.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/parser/MetaDataEvaluator.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/parser/Node.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/parser/NodeFactory.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/parser/NodePrinter.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/parser/Parser.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/parser/TypeIdentifierNode.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/semantics/CodeGenerator.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/semantics/ConfigurationEvaluator.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/semantics/ConstantEvaluator.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/semantics/Emitter.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/semantics/FlowAnalyzer.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/semantics/QName.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/semantics/ReferenceValue.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/semantics/TypeValue.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/util/Context.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/util/ContextStatics.java
Added Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/parser/ApplyTypeExprNode.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/semantics/ParameterizedName.java

please can you send in yr email address.
I am attaching the code right now with an explanation!!!

New BOBJ 4.0 Implementation, impact to existing BW 7

Hello all,
We're in the preliminary stages of getting our BOBJ 4.0 Implementation project going. I had a question for which I haven't been able to get a straight answer on. Background Info: we have an existing BW 7 system with approximately 500 users, low to moderate activity. We plan to deploy BOBJ mostly for Dashboards and drill down capabilities; the user count is not expected to increase any time soon, only the number of reports.
I have gone throught the sizing exercise for the BOBJ piece, but I haven't found anything which tells me what kind of additional load I should expect on my BW backend systems due to this new implementation. Does any one know how this is determined? Or if there's any impact caused by the integration of BOBJ to the backend BW systems?
Thanks in advance,
Jose

Hello,
there will be impact depending on how you use BOBJ. If you use a lot of On- Demand queries from BOBJ against the BW the load will be during business hours. If you use the Scheduling option of BOBJ the reports will be refreshed after the BW is loaded.
You cant really determine the new load which is coming with BOBJ. Report design is here also key. If the Reports fetch may to much data as original needed the load will be also more on BW side.
I would recommend you are upgrading your BW to 7.3. With this release the BOBJ tools can use the BICS interface natively. This will be much faster.
Regards
-Seb.

IS-U Implementation -- Impacts !

Hello everybody,
Can you detail the impact will cause IS-U implementation under a company which already is working with SAP R/3. Also, can you detail the impacts filtered by IS-U module (CS, DM, BI&IN, FI-CA).
Thanks in advance.
Fernando.

By impact I mean what can happen if we configure some tables, letu2019s say, in Billing and this new configuration modifies the behavior of R/3u2026 we want to know a complete list of things to have in mindu2026 for example, if we create a new document classu2026 we know we need to have a lot of care since this is shared with R/3? Did you get the idea???
We are implementing SAP for Utilities on top of an existing R/3 (Core) implementation in the same system.
Cheers,
Fernando.

Us Payoll : Tax Model Changes : Creation Of A New Tax Class : Impact

Hi Experts,
Has anyone earlier created a new tax class specification of PC 71 for a wagetype so that it is taxed only for a particular tax authority , if yes how did you handle the impact on the other tax authorities ,did you create new entries ( with the new specification ) for other tax authorities as well so that the existing tax calculations happen as it is.
The issue is explained IN DETAIL below :
We have one requirement to include certain wage types X Y Z for the calculation of Transit District Excise Tax /435 in the tax authority ABC
When we checked our system, for these wage types X Y Z the corresponding tax classification is set as 0 ( Regular taxable wages ) which is linked to tax type 1 and not linked to 35 tax type , so we need to assign it to a specification which is having both 1 and 35 tax types. We can assign this to 935 which is linked to both 1 and 35 however this will impact all the wage types that are linked to 0 ( Regular taxable wages ) specification in PC 71.
Our business does not want these other wagetypes to be impacted i.e the requirement is that ONLY X Y Z wagetypes should be included in the calculation of Transit District Exercise Tax /435 for the tax authority ABC.So the option is that we have is to create a new 71 tax class specificaiton say * and assign it to these wagetypes and then create a new entry assining this * in the table T5UTM to 935 for this tax authority so that it is taxed for Transit District Excise Tax /435.
However since we are assigning a new tax class specffication to these wagetypes, there will be a impact on ALL THE OTHER tax authorities where these wagetypes X Y Z are having an old specification of 0 ( Regular taxable wages ). So we have to create newe entries with this new specification * in the table T5UTM so that the current tax calcutions are not impacted.
We have about 500 tax authoties or 500 tax models where we will have to create new entries with the new tax class specirication '" * " , so that these wagetypes are taxed as they are being taxed today, for all of the other tax authorities.
Has anyone earlier created a new tax class specirication of PC 71 , if yes how did you handle the impact on the other tax authorities ,did you create new entries for other tax authorities., which is next to being impossible as we cannot create 500 entries.
Alternatively we are looking at using the TAX MODIFIER for this requirement , please advise if anyone has used TAX MODIFIER for this kind of a requirement mentioned above. Any suggestions are most welcome.
Regards,
Vineeth
Please Dont use Caps letters
Edited by: Moderator

Yes we are also referring to the same and this is the actual issue we have , each tax authority has its own tax model. We have to customize (add) this new tax type in the tax models or it won't be considered ( as you have mentioned ).
But we have over 500 different tax models and we cannot be adding this new specification in each tax model , Please advise how this could be handled other than writing a rule. We are just thinking loud if there is anything that we are missing.
These wagetypes are quiet common in all tax authorities , so have to be added in all the tax models i.e. for all tax authorities.

New Org Level impact in existing roles

Hi,
I would like to set/create 2 fields as organizational levels. For example KLART and DOKAR. Checking these I realized there is a big amount of roles "affected" by this change.
Because I plan to use the organizational level only for new roles , I would like to know which impact could have this change for existing roles, should one modify the existing roles after creating the Org Levels ? or in contrast they still work as always an no changes / adjustments is needed?
Thanks and regards
FedeX

Thanks Bernhard,
I have a question
As I mentioned before my goal is that the existing roles keep working after running that program... and do not want to perform any adaptation....only if there is a real error that avoid work correctly.
In these 2 cases the role will keep working properly ( I mean restricting in the way that it uses to do).
1) In case field is copied to the Orglevel area after running the program and the value(s) will stay in both places (OrgLevel and Original place)
2) In case field is NOT copied to the Orglevel area after running the program but the value still in the original place .
right?
Thanks
FedeX

New GL and Impact on BI Financial statement reports

Dear All,
I would like to know if and how the finacial statment reports would be affected by using the new GL extractor 0FI_GL_14. New GL is being implemented on ECC, hence the change in extractor in BI.
Is there a standard cube that can be used for Financial statement reports(Balance Sheet comparision, BS by PC,P&L reporting by PC) for New GL.
Currently we are getting our financial statement reports out of a Virtual cube which is based on a function module Module:RS_BCT_FIGL_DATA_GET_VC1.
*Our current extractor for FIGL is 0FI_GL_4 .
Appreciate your Input on this .

Hi,
You will find all the details here:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/49/5700570223413085021a8b4ef1087a/frameset.htm
-Mayuri

New GL implemented, problems in F.01 and trail balance report and balance carry forward.

Dear Friends,
One of the my client recently implemented New GL in the Dev system, and getting posted the documents. now we are facing the many problems in the Dev system.
1. F.01 Financial statement report not generating for the year 2008 to till 2014 fiscal years.
2. the same in trail balance also not generating data form the year 2008 to till 2014 fiscal years.
3.system is asking the carry forward the balances form the 2008 to till, when we try to carry forward the 2008 year amount only forwarding for the all the fiscal year, not adding the other balances.
i went through some forums and i did the some analysis on this, after implementing new GL the table GLT0 was desble, data was not updated in the GLT0 all the data has been moved to FAGLFLEXT table. later i activated the table GLT0 and able to storing the data both the tables.
now i want to see the all my privious year report in the DEV system. all the data is there in the tables expect GLT0. how can i recover reports as well as how can i do the carry forward balances?
even still i have not carry forward for the 2014 balances, those balances also not there in the reports? but data is there in the table.
Please help me on this.
Regards,
Krish

Hello,
balance carry forward is done with TCd.
FAGLGVTR
when you are on SAP nGL.
any further quesitions?
By the way why don´t you do searching?
all the best erwin

New GL Implementation, GL balances are not matched

Dear Friends,
In my project new GL is implemented, we are facing the problem of mismatch of GL balances of Tax GL,
Can anyone please guide how to find the differences in the same.
Thanks and regads,
MD.

You could use transaction code GCAC to compare GL account balances between any two ledgers.

Things to bear in new DBM implementation

Hi all,
This is not a question but just a general topic regarding the points to bear in mind while implementing DBM solution.
The latest release of DBM -ECC-DIMP 6.0 does not have the credit check functionality for sales order/delivery/PGI as is available on the standard R/3. This means that if the credit check functionality is required by the organisation then this will have to be developed on your own.
In case there are lots of validations which you require in you require in the business process then this would have to be build in various BADI which have been provided. Since the DBM is based on the action control matrix ( Order control engine) please take care while configuring the action control. This is a very sensitive area and one wrong configuration will stop the process which you may have tested as working fine.
Supersession is a good functionality which has been provided as standard feature on DBM but this works fine on DBM orders. In case you require this in R/3 quotations and orders ( VA21 /VA01) then some tweaking on the item category determination and item category configuration may be required.
Vendor material master table (/DBM/OMARA) is also a good feature since this helps do away with your own custom tables for maintaining the vendor material master data within your own system.
Cash desk is also another feature which is a new DBM feature but this is still not stable and it requires the system adminstrator some time to understand the correct behavior of this feature.
Enjoy the new DBM and also help SAP to stabilize this product since there are quite number of things which are not yet mature enough to take care of all the possible business situations all around the world.
Cheers.
Kartik Shah

Hi vishal,
There is a tab called Material Exchange in ME21N under item overview tab. When you select the item which is part of supersession chain and press this icon system will propose the list of materials under the chain and you can select the material and use this to replace the original material which was proposed on purchase order.
Search on SAP Help web site. The is quite a bit of documentaiton for supersession behavior in purchase order.
We are not using this functionality in our implementation.
Trust this helps
Regards,
Kartik Shah

New tab implementation at item level in ME21N/ME22N/ME23N.

Hi Friends,
I have implemented two badis 1. ME_GUI_PO_CUST and 2. ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST to get a new tab at item level in ME21N/ME22N/ME23N, I could see this new tab only in ME23N but not in ME21N/ME22N, and I found that Badi ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST is not getting triggered for any of these tcodes : ME21N/ME22N/ME23N. Can anybody help me getting this issue resolved with coding example as well.
Thanks in Advance.

Hi Know ,
I know that we have to use the following BADIs
ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST
ME_GUI_PO_CUST
But I does not know what are the methods to be implemented
and what is the code we have to write in that methods .
Thanks in advance ,
Siva.

New GL implementation impact

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for