New GL Implementation

We are planning to implement New GL within 7 months time. This will happen during the year of 2008, approximately June 2008. Our Fiscal year calendar start Jan 1 and end Dec 31.
Is it possible of switching on the new GL on the middle of the year?
As per SAP standard, they have recommended to implement New GL during the start of the Fiscal year. Is there an exception to this rule?
Thanks & regards,
Rob

Hi Rob,
I read few SAP documents on 'New GL Migration', all recommend migration at the beginning of fiscal year.
https://websmp210.sap-ag.de/glmig
What i assume is 'The lesser the old GL data in a new fiscal year, its better for migration activity effort'.
Did anyone migrate after period 1?
Regards,
Somar

Similar Messages

How to register new interface implementation?

Hi,
I have the following problem:
There exists a self written webdynpro application. This application uses a Java Interface. The administrator of the application can add new functionality to the application by adding a new line to a table. He inserts the name of a class which implements that Java interface. This class has the new functionality.
For each interface implementation the user of the webdynpro gets a value into a list. He can select an entry from this list. This value tells to the application that it has to create an object from the related java interface implementation.
Now I wonder how I can tell to the webdynpro application that it knows all interface implementations which will come in the future? If I do not "register" or reference the new interface implementations, then I think the webdynpro application has ClassNotFound errors.
The developers should make there own projects for each interface implementation an deploy them. But what must be done, that the webdynpro application knows them?
Can you please give me some suggestions?
Thank you and best regards,
Marcus

You can register a Mac, but not an accessory like the Time Capsule. Keep a copy of your sales receipt.....just in case.

New GL implementation impact

Dear All
We are going to implement New GL in our ECC system .
In our existing system landscape we have profit center and GL reporting based on extractors 0EC_PCA_1& 0EC_PCA_2
My question is if post New GL implementation we can still use the existing extractors or we need to switch to new extractors to maintain the current
reporting in BW ?
Thanks
Ankush

Suyash
You are correct . I did some more analysis on my side and 0EC_PCA_1& 0EC_PCA_2 are fetching data from GLPCA /GLPCT tables which will become obsolete after new GL implementation . So we would need to use one of the below extractos to replace the existing ones ( PCA extractors )
0FI_GL_10
0FI_GL_14
Regards
Ankush

New to Implementation

Hi Experts,
I new to implementation project. Project is ready to start here the existing no system for client. We have to build the SAP BI system to them. R/3 is in process BI is going to start. Can Please any body guide me What are the reports we have to show in demo to them based on that we have to gather the requirement from them. we have SD,FI,MM,QM,PM,PP,HR modules to implement.
Please guide me....

Hi,
Check the below link which provides all the business content info like , IOs, ICs, DSOs, Data sources used and the standard Bi content reports...
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp2/helpdata/en/6a/f247bf0ce745eab5648a309fbd784e/frameset.htm
Here in the link you have BI Content -click on it - here it will displays all the BI content related all modules...
[sales N Distribution|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_tm80/helpdata/en/f0/3baf6718d2427a94ced005f298be06/frameset.htm]
Condition Rate Deviation (Sales Order and Billing Document)
Condition Amount (Billing Document Document: Condition Amount (Sales Order)] Condition Amount (Sales Order)
Document: Condition Amount By Customer] Condition Amount By Customer
Document: Average Delivery Processing Times] Average Delivery Processing Times
Document: Billing Documents] Billing Documents
Document: Deliveries] Deliveries
Document: Delivery Delays per Sales Area] Delivery Delays per Sales Area
Document: Delivery Delays per Sold-to Party] Delivery Delays per Sold-to Party
Document: Distribution Channel Analysis] Distribution Channel Analysis
Document: Faultless Sales Order Processing] Faultless Sales Order Processing
Document: Fulfillment Rates] Fulfillment Rates
Document: Fulfillment Rates: Values] Fulfillment Rates: Values
Check the below links for FI
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp2/helpdata/en/65/7beb3cad744026e10000000a11405a/frameset.htm
General Ledger
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp2/helpdata/en/57/dd153c4eb5d82ce10000000a114084/frameset.htm
[Asset Accounting|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_bic735/helpdata/en/a8/f4153c4eb5d82ce10000000a114084/frameset.htm]
Etc
All HR related
help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp2/helpdata/en/2a/77eb3cad744026e10000000a11405a/frameset.htm

Allowing a new sensor implementation to learn

Hi,
I'm setting up a new IPS sensor on an ASA 5500.
I've heard a recommendation that for a new sensor implementation at a given site, it is better to allow the sensor to learn traffic patterns in promiscous mode before deploying inline mode, otherwise the sensor may not interpret certain events correctly.
Is that a valid statement, and if so, does that mean you must wait to deploy any particular policies until this learning is complete?
Thanks.

Let me explain my point of view:
The sensor in question is an AIP-SSM, so the traffic is normalized by the firewall. In this setup there is no difference in the detection capabilities between promiscous and inline. Promiscous mode has problems with traffic that the attacker has fragmented in an abnormal way or modified segments. Both are controlled by the ASA and don't show up at the sensor.
So the signatures will behave the same. Now you want to make sure that you don't lose traffic while you are stil in the phase of minimizing or eliminating your false polsitives. You could filter out the deny-actions, but as a human you could make a mistake there and you configure something that has to be reconfigured later when your first tuning-phase is over. Both is not a problem when you observe your sensor in promiscous-mode. The change to inline is then very easy and your sensor doesn't need to be changed any more.
For your promiscous delta: The PD has nothing to do how or if a signature triggers or how the signature behaves. It is only a modifier for your Risk-Rating that helps you to make better decisions when you are at your monitoring-console, have thousands of alarms and have to decide which to process first.
Don't stop after you've improved your network! Improve the world by lending money to the working poor:
http://www.kiva.org/invitedby/karsteni

Methodology or Process Documents for new XI implementations

Hi All,
Can someone point me to any docs on Process/Methodology new XI implementations.
Thanks & Regards,
Nandini

Nandini,
Please refer the below thread and look for the URL I gave over there
Re: XI template documents
Best regards,
raj.

[svn] 1191: ASC side of the new vector implementation .

Revision: 1191
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-04-11 07:56:10 -0700 (Fri, 11 Apr 2008)
Log Message:
ASC side of the new vector implementation . Strict mode checking now works for all vector types.
ASC test, tamarin tests, and flex checkintests pass
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/abc/AbcParser.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/embedding/LintEvaluator.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/embedding/avmplus/ActionBlockConstants .java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/embedding/avmplus/ActionBlockEmitter.j ava
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/embedding/avmplus/ByteCodeFactory.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/embedding/avmplus/GlobalBuilder.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/parser/Evaluator.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/parser/MetaDataEvaluator.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/parser/Node.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/parser/NodeFactory.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/parser/NodePrinter.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/parser/Parser.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/parser/TypeIdentifierNode.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/semantics/CodeGenerator.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/semantics/ConfigurationEvaluator.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/semantics/ConstantEvaluator.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/semantics/Emitter.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/semantics/FlowAnalyzer.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/semantics/QName.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/semantics/ReferenceValue.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/semantics/TypeValue.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/util/Context.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/util/ContextStatics.java
Added Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/parser/ApplyTypeExprNode.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/semantics/ParameterizedName.java

please can you send in yr email address.
I am attaching the code right now with an explanation!!!

New GL implemented, problems in F.01 and trail balance report and balance carry forward.

Dear Friends,
One of the my client recently implemented New GL in the Dev system, and getting posted the documents. now we are facing the many problems in the Dev system.
1. F.01 Financial statement report not generating for the year 2008 to till 2014 fiscal years.
2. the same in trail balance also not generating data form the year 2008 to till 2014 fiscal years.
3.system is asking the carry forward the balances form the 2008 to till, when we try to carry forward the 2008 year amount only forwarding for the all the fiscal year, not adding the other balances.
i went through some forums and i did the some analysis on this, after implementing new GL the table GLT0 was desble, data was not updated in the GLT0 all the data has been moved to FAGLFLEXT table. later i activated the table GLT0 and able to storing the data both the tables.
now i want to see the all my privious year report in the DEV system. all the data is there in the tables expect GLT0. how can i recover reports as well as how can i do the carry forward balances?
even still i have not carry forward for the 2014 balances, those balances also not there in the reports? but data is there in the table.
Please help me on this.
Regards,
Krish

Hello,
balance carry forward is done with TCd.
FAGLGVTR
when you are on SAP nGL.
any further quesitions?
By the way why don´t you do searching?
all the best erwin

New GL Implementation, GL balances are not matched

Dear Friends,
In my project new GL is implemented, we are facing the problem of mismatch of GL balances of Tax GL,
Can anyone please guide how to find the differences in the same.
Thanks and regads,
MD.

You could use transaction code GCAC to compare GL account balances between any two ledgers.

Things to bear in new DBM implementation

Hi all,
This is not a question but just a general topic regarding the points to bear in mind while implementing DBM solution.
The latest release of DBM -ECC-DIMP 6.0 does not have the credit check functionality for sales order/delivery/PGI as is available on the standard R/3. This means that if the credit check functionality is required by the organisation then this will have to be developed on your own.
In case there are lots of validations which you require in you require in the business process then this would have to be build in various BADI which have been provided. Since the DBM is based on the action control matrix ( Order control engine) please take care while configuring the action control. This is a very sensitive area and one wrong configuration will stop the process which you may have tested as working fine.
Supersession is a good functionality which has been provided as standard feature on DBM but this works fine on DBM orders. In case you require this in R/3 quotations and orders ( VA21 /VA01) then some tweaking on the item category determination and item category configuration may be required.
Vendor material master table (/DBM/OMARA) is also a good feature since this helps do away with your own custom tables for maintaining the vendor material master data within your own system.
Cash desk is also another feature which is a new DBM feature but this is still not stable and it requires the system adminstrator some time to understand the correct behavior of this feature.
Enjoy the new DBM and also help SAP to stabilize this product since there are quite number of things which are not yet mature enough to take care of all the possible business situations all around the world.
Cheers.
Kartik Shah

Hi vishal,
There is a tab called Material Exchange in ME21N under item overview tab. When you select the item which is part of supersession chain and press this icon system will propose the list of materials under the chain and you can select the material and use this to replace the original material which was proposed on purchase order.
Search on SAP Help web site. The is quite a bit of documentaiton for supersession behavior in purchase order.
We are not using this functionality in our implementation.
Trust this helps
Regards,
Kartik Shah

New tab implementation at item level in ME21N/ME22N/ME23N.

Hi Friends,
I have implemented two badis 1. ME_GUI_PO_CUST and 2. ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST to get a new tab at item level in ME21N/ME22N/ME23N, I could see this new tab only in ME23N but not in ME21N/ME22N, and I found that Badi ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST is not getting triggered for any of these tcodes : ME21N/ME22N/ME23N. Can anybody help me getting this issue resolved with coding example as well.
Thanks in Advance.

Hi Know ,
I know that we have to use the following BADIs
ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST
ME_GUI_PO_CUST
But I does not know what are the methods to be implemented
and what is the code we have to write in that methods .
Thanks in advance ,
Siva.

NEW GL implementation Pre-Study

Hello Experts,
we are starting a Project to do a Pre-Study on Migrating to New GL.
I request you all to provide some details From FI / MM / SD perspective what are the tasks / Prerequisites that i need to check before giving a Green Signal to start the Implementation.
If you have any details on Brazil specific processes is also much helpful to me.
Any help is much appreciated.
Br,
Venkat
Moderator: Please, search SDN

HI Venkat,
Please refer the below note link for New GL Migration.
1014364 New G/L migration: Information, prerequisites, performance
als refer the note 812919.
1070629 FAQs: New general ledger migration
I hope above note no 1014364 will resolve your issue.
If you need any help please revert back tome.
Regards
madhu M

New BADI Implementation

Hello,
I need help with implementations for new BADIs. I'm trying to implement BADI PT_ABS_REQ which has about 15 methods. I want my custom logic called for only one of these methods and want SAP standard logic to be called for all other methods. Is this possible? Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Kishore

Hi,
Steps:
1.     Execute Business Add-In(BADI) transaction SE18
2.     Enter BADI name i.e. PT_ABS_REQ and press the display
        button
3.     Select menu option Implementation->Create
4.     Give implementation a name such as Z_PT_ABS_REQ
5.      You can now make any changes you require to the BADI within this
        implementation, for example choose the Interface tab
6.     Double click on the method you want to change, you can now enter
        any code you require.
7.      Please note to find out what import and export parameters a
        method has got return the original BADI definition
        (i.e. PT_ABS_REQ) and double click on the method name
        for example within PT_ABS_REQ contract is a method
8.      When changes have been made activate the implementation
YOu can go through these links...
http://esnips.com/doc/10016c34-55a7-4b13-8f5f-bf720422d265/BADIs.pdf
http://esnips.com/doc/e06e4171-29df-462f-b857-54fac19a9d8e/ppt-on-badis.ppt
http://esnips.com/doc/43a58f51-5d92-4213-913a-de05e9faac0d/Business-Addin.doc
http://esnips.com/doc/1e10392e-64d8-4181-b2a5-5f04d8f87839/badi.doc
http://esnips.com/doc/365d4c4d-9fcb-4189-85fd-866b7bf25257/customer-exits--badi.zip
http://esnips.com/doc/3b7bbc09-c095-45a0-9e89-91f2f86ee8e9/BADI-Introduction.ppt
<b>Reward points</b>
Regards

Instantiating a class using new with implements or extends

I have created a class as follows:
class MyFileFilter extends javax.swing.filechooser.FileFilter implements java.io.FilenameFilter {
     ...code here...
}and it all works fine. If I try to use this code directly without importing the class, I would normally use the new keyword, but since this uses extends and implements, it is giving me errors such as:
[javac] ';' expected
Is there any way that I can use this with the new keyword, such as:
MyFileFilter theFilter = new MyFileFilter extends javax.swing.filechooser.FileFilter implements java.io.FilenameFilter {
     ...code here...

maybe your ';' error is really a coding error. Here is a sample of code where I do something similar in the middle of a method.
    public static void redirectOutput() {
        try {
            // make a print stream that logs the time for each entry.
            class TimeStampPrintStream
                extends PrintStream {
                public TimeStampPrintStream(OutputStream out, boolean b) {
                    super(out, b);
                public void println(String s) {
                    super.println(new Date() + ": " + s);
            System.out.close();
            System.err.close();
            System.setErr(new TimeStampPrintStream(new FileOutputStream(com.perigee.fileio.LogFile.getLogDirectory() + "System.err"), true));
            System.setOut(new TimeStampPrintStream(new FileOutputStream(com.perigee.fileio.LogFile.getLogDirectory() + "System.out"), true));
            System.err.println("System.err File");
                System.out.println("System.out File");
        } catch (Exception e) {
            System.out.println("Could not redirect System.out/err");
            e.printStackTrace();
    }

Problem with using newer jsf implementation

Is it possible to use jsf-libraries from wls 10.3.1 on 10.3.0?
Or how to use newer version of jsf implementation than JSF RI 1.2_03 on wls 10.3?
I have also use RichFaces 3.3.1 and when I have tried to use Mojarra 1.2_12 richfaces components haven't worked correctly.
Thanks in advance,
Luke

I looked there and
"If your try to ship your webapplication with a separate JSF implementation, you are free to do this. Keep in mind, that the dependency injection mechanisms does not work with managed beans, if you do not use any of the WLS provided JSF containers.
Declaring something like this:
@EJB
private MySession session;
will lead to a java.lang.NullPointerException because of the missing depencency injection mechanisms. Would love to know any details about this. Maybe I'll find out more in the future.."
The problem is that I use annotations like @EJB, so ...
I'm still waiting for solution how to implement WeblogicInjectionProvider.
Regards,
Luke

New GL Implementation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for