New ID of related object in PO13

Hi all,
I explain u my prb.-
T code - PO13
Select Infotype name - Object
Then Create
Then Enter Object Abbr --> Save and then new screen is opened.
In New Screen, In related Object block
Type of related Object - Organizational Unit then at the
ID of related object field --> F4 --> Organizational Structure window open.
Then expand --> directors office
Click on Sales and Marketting --> now click on central sales --> Some branches name are displayed ( few fields are Branch name , ID , code ..).
I want to add some new branches in that list.
So pls tell me the procedure of add new branches in this list.
Thanks & regards,
Abhinay Sachan

Hi,
PO13 is to create Positions, but a you want to create branches can use object type 'O' i.e t-code PO10.
Suppose u want to add 2 brances there.
then 1st create branches using
t-code PO10
select reqd. plan version
select object(1000) infotype -> create -> give Object abbr. and Object name -> save
the n in the next screen in the ID of related object give the object id of CENTRAL SALES. then SAVE.
repeat the procedure again for n number of brances u want to add.
~Thrilleswar

Similar Messages

EJB/JPA Related: Objects are not going to delete from a Collection

Hi All,
I am developing a WebDynpro application using EJB3 model with JPA as a persistence tool. I have mapped using Annotations.
All other works run fine but If I deleted a record through view It will not delete from database.
I have two entities : First : OperationDayWorkingCapitalPlan in which following relation is defined:
 @OneToMany(mappedBy="operationDayWorkingCapitalPlan",targetEntity=BranchPartyCollectionsPlan.class,
 fetch=FetchType.EAGER, cascade=CascadeType.ALL)
 private Collection<BranchPartyCollectionsPlan> branchPartyCollectionsPlans = new
 ArrayList<BranchPartyCollectionsPlan>();
related methods:
 public Collection<BranchPartyCollectionsPlan> getBranchPartyCollectionsPlans() {
 return branchPartyCollectionsPlans;
 public void setBranchPartyCollectionsPlans(
 Collection<BranchPartyCollectionsPlan> branchPartyCollectionsPlans) {
 this.branchPartyCollectionsPlans = branchPartyCollectionsPlans;
 public void addBranchPartyCollectionsPlan(BranchPartyCollectionsPlan branchPartyCollectionsPlan) {
 this.branchPartyCollectionsPlans.add(branchPartyCollectionsPlan);
 if (branchPartyCollectionsPlan.getOperationDayWorkingCapitalPlan() == null || branchPartyCollectionsPlan.getOperationDayWorkingCapitalPlan() != this) {
 branchPartyCollectionsPlan.setOperationDayWorkingCapitalPlan(this);
 public void removeBranchPartyCollectionsPlan(BranchPartyCollectionsPlan branchPartyCollectionsPlan) {
 if (branchPartyCollectionsPlan == null)
 return;
 if (this.branchPartyCollectionsPlans != null)
 if (this.branchPartyCollectionsPlans.remove(branchPartyCollectionsPlan)) {
 branchPartyCollectionsPlan.setOperationDayWorkingCapitalPlan((OperationDayWorkingCapitalPlan)null);
and Second one is : BranchPartyCollectionsPlan in which the following relation(inverse) is defined:
@ManyToOne(fetch=FetchType.EAGER)
 @JoinColumn(name="OPERATIONDAYWORKINGCAPITALPLANID")
 OperationDayWorkingCapitalPlan operationDayWorkingCapitalPlan
related getter and setter:
 public OperationDayWorkingCapitalPlan getOperationDayWorkingCapitalPlan() {
 return operationDayWorkingCapitalPlan;
 public void setOperationDayWorkingCapitalPlan(
 OperationDayWorkingCapitalPlan operationDayWorkingCapitalPlan) {
 OperationDayWorkingCapitalPlan oldOperationDayWorkingCapitalPlan = this.operationDayWorkingCapitalPlan;
 if (oldOperationDayWorkingCapitalPlan != null){
 oldOperationDayWorkingCapitalPlan.removeBranchPartyCollectionsPlan(this);
 this.operationDayWorkingCapitalPlan = operationDayWorkingCapitalPlan;
 if (operationDayWorkingCapitalPlan != null){
 operationDayWorkingCapitalPlan.addBranchPartyCollectionsPlan(this);
Plz help me where am I wrong. Why objects(BranchPartyCollectionsPlan) from collection not delete when I merge the main object (OperationDayWorkingCapitalPlan).
Edited by: kapitsu on Oct 27, 2009 10:24 AM

Hi Mayank,
You can check the below Link.
PSA Not Deleting, error : DDL time(___1):.....0 milliseconds
Regards
Rahul

Oracle Forms - Relation Objects Concepts

Hi,
Note: This is a newbie question.
I have been tasked to address the following question:
"What do understand by Relation Object? Differentiate between isolated, non-isolated and cascaded relation object properties."
I have tried to search on this website to find information on the concept of Relation Objects but to no avail. Can anyone please point me to the right resource.
Thanks and regards.

Setting Relation Properties that Affect Coordination
When you create a master-detail relation, you must decide how Oracle Forms should manage coordination between the master and detail blocks.
Specifically, you need to answer the following questions:
Should end users be able to delete a master record if there are associated detail records present?
If end users can delete a master record, should Oracle Forms delete the associated detail records also?
If an end user makes a new record in the master block the current record, should Oracle Forms fetch the associated detail records immediately, or wait until the end user navigates to the detail block?
The answers to these questions will depend on application-specific requirements.
By setting the properties of the relation object, you can implement the master-detail functionality most appropriate for your application.
The properties that affect the functionality of a relation include Delete Record Behavior, Coordination, and Prevent Masterless Operation.
Delete Record Behavior Property
The Delete Record Behavior property (formerly called the Master Deletes property) allows you to specify how the deletion of a record in the master block should affect records in the detail block.
You can specify Cascading, Isolated, or Non-Isolated:
Cascading
The master record can be deleted, and any associated detail records are automatically deleted from the database at commit time.
If relations are nested to several levels, only records in the immediate detail block are deleted.
That is, deletions do not automatically cascade to multiple levels of a relation chain.
Isolated
The master record can be deleted, but the associated detail records are not deleted from the database.
Non-Isolated
The default setting.
The master record cannot be deleted if associated detail records exist in the database.
Note:
If your database is using the ORACLE7 Server cascading deletes feature, do not use the Cascading deletes option in Oracle Forms.
Coordination Properties
The values of the coordination properties Deferred and Auto Query determine when the population phase of block coordination will occur:
Immediate (Deferred = No)
The default setting.
When a coordination-causing event occurs, Oracle Forms fetches the detail records immediately.
Deferred (Deferred = Yes, Auto Query = No)
When a coordination-causing event occurs, Oracle Forms does not automatically fetch the detail records.
To fetch the detail records, the end user must navigate to the detail block and explicitly execute a query.
Deferred with Auto Query (Deferred = Yes, Auto Query = Yes)
When a coordination-causing event occurs, Oracle Forms defers fetching the associated detail records until the end user navigates to the detail block

SQL batch doesn't work; How to fetch related objects with fetch group?

I have two questions:
1. SQL Batch doesn't seem to work. I have tested some batch object creation
with BatchLimit set to -1, 0, 1, 25, 100. They all have similar
performance.
kodo.jdbc.DBDictionary: BatchLimit=25
2. How to use custom fetch group to fetch related objects? The example of
custom fetch group only show how to fetch different attributes in different
groups. I have a test cases where I would like to pre-fetch related objects
to save round trip.
Enviroments:
* Kodo 3.1.0 RC1
* Oracle 9i release 1
Thanks for any help!
Qingshan Luo
Senior Software Engineer
Open Harbor
1123 Industrial Road
San Carlos, CA 94070
Phone: 650-413-4251
Fax: 650-413-4298

try poracle 10g driver. At least they fixed terrible CLOB bug may be batch
to. BTW 9.2.x has problem with batching with deferred constraints so be
careful
"Greg Campbell" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:c3dmnu$rmj$[email protected]..
>
"Qingshan Luo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:c3dg7q$mdl$[email protected]..
Hi,
I have two technical questions with Kodo.
1. SQL Batch doesn't seem to work. I have tried batch size of -1, 0, 1,25.
But the performance from batch creating objects is not affected by batch
size.
kodo.jdbc.DBDictionary: BatchLimit=25You may be running into a bug in the Oracle 9.2 driver. That driverdoesn't
reliably give update counts when using batching and prepared statement
caching. By default, Kodo will turn off batching. You can manuallyenable
batching by setting the BatchLimit on your DBDictionary, as you've done.If
you do this, though, you may want to turn off prepared statement cachingby
setting MaxCachedStatements to 0 (see
http://www.solarmetric.com/Software/Documentation/3.1.0RC1/docs/ref_guide_dbsetup.html#ref_guide_dbsetup_builtin).
>
2. How to use custom fetch groups to eagerly fetch related persistable
objects? Example only showed attributes, not relationships.You can find information on setting up eager fetching of relations at
http://www.solarmetric.com/Software/Documentation/3.0.3/docs/ref_guide_
perfpack_eager.html
Basically, you'll need to add the relations to your fetch group, and
set the eager fetching mode.
Enviroment:
* Kodo 3.1.0 RC1
* Oracle 9i release 1.
Qingshan Luo
Senior Software Engineer
Open Harbor
1123 Industrial Road
San Carlos, CA 94070
Phone: 650-413-4251
Fax: 650-413-4298

Are there any new RESTful SDK related planned for 4.1 SP3 release

Gurus,
Recently i saw the SAP BusinessObjects BI4.1 SP03 What’s new guide. But did not find anything about RESTful SDK on it.
Are there any new RESTful SDK related planned for 4.1 SP3 release? where can i find those information.
Thanks,
Tilak

@Terry,
In SP3 we are releasing
1) Major feature which is the ability to GET/POST/PUT/DEL input controls
2) Also we are delivering helpers to GET/POST/PUT/DEL any kind of table in a given report, so a consummer who wants to add a table just has to submit the xml describing the table instead of the XML describing the entire report. (includes ranking)
3) GET datapath of a given Report Element
4) GET dataset of a report Report Element
5) GET/PUT LOV of a Data Object
6) GET/POST/PUT/DEL Custom Property for a given Report Element
7) GET/POST/DEL a webi document as zip (create a zip file containing the webi document html + images, then retrieve it, or delete it)
All this is documented in the WebI REST SDK Online Guide that will be made availble by when the SP3 is released to customers.

Class related object

How can I create a class related object??
In my code the class doens't find the log object(FileWriter)
example:
public class LogFile
public LogFile()
try
File outputFile = new File("/Java/Iss/log/BatchQuery.log");
FileWriter log = new FileWriter(outputFile);
catch (IOException exp)
System.out.println("Fatal error, can't write to log - "+exp.getMessage());
private static LogFile instance = new LogFile();
public static LogFile getInstance()
if(instance==null)
return instance = new LogFile();
else
return instance;
public static synchronized void write(String toLog)
log.write(toLog);
log.write("\n");
public static synchronized void close()
log.close();
}

Hi, shouldn t your code be like this ? :
public class LogFile
private static LogFile instance = new LogFile();
private FileWritter log = null;
public LogFile()
try
File outputFile = new File("/Java/Iss/log/BatchQuery.log");
log = new FileWriter(outputFile);
catch (IOException exp)
System.out.println("Fatal error, can't write to log - "+exp.getMessage());
public static LogFile getInstance()
if(instance==null)
return instance = new LogFile();
else
return instance;
public synchronized void write(String toLog)
log.write(toLog);
log.write("\n");
public synchronized void close()
log.close();
instance = null;
So now you have a static getInstance() method to recover the unique instance.
All others methods shouldn t be static so that they shall be called only if an instance has been generated.

Best practice "changing several related objects via BDT" (Business Data Toolset) / Mehrere verbundene Objekte per BDT ändern

Hallo,
I want to start a
discussion, to find a best practice method to change several related master
data objects via BDT. At the moment we are faced with miscellaneous requirements,
where we have a master data object which uses BDT framework for maintenance (in
our case an insured objects). While changing or creating the insured objects a
several related objects e.g. Business Partner should also be changed or
created. So am searching for a best practices approach how to implement such a
solution.
One Idea was to so call a
report via SUBMIT AND RETURN in Event DSAVC or DSAVE. Unfortunately this implementation
method has only poor options to handle errors. Second it is also hard to keep LUW
together.
Another idea is to call an additional
BDT instance in the DCHCK-event via FM BDT_INSTANCE_SELECT and the parameters
iv_xpush_classic = ‘X’ and iv_xpop_classic = ‘X’. At this time we didn’t get
this solution working correctly, because there is always something missing
(e.g. global memory is not transferred correctly between the two BDT instances).
So hopefully you can report
about your implementations to find a best practice approach for facing such
requirements.
Hallo
ich möchte an der Stelle eine Diskussion starten um einen Best Practice
Ansatz zu finden, der eine BDT Implementierung/Erweiterung beschreibt, bei der
verschiedene abhängige BDT-Objekte geändert werden. Momentan treffen bei uns
mehrere Anforderungen an, bei deinen Änderungen eines BDT Objektes an ein
anderes BDT Objekte vererbt werden sollen. Sprich es sollen weitere Objekte geänderte
werden, wenn ein Objekt (in unserem Fall ein Versicherungsvertrag) angelegt
oder geändert wird (zum Beispiel ein Geschäftspartner)
Die erste unserer Ideen war es, im Zeitpunkt DSAVC oder DSAVE einen
Report per SUBMIT AND RETURN aufzurufen. Dieser sollte dann die abhängigen Änderungen
durchführen. Allerdings gibt es hier Probleme mit der Fehlerbehandlung, da
diese asynchrone stattfinden muss. Weiterhin ist es auch schwer die Konsistenz der
LUW zu garantieren.
Ein anderer Ansatz den wir verfolgt hatten, war im Zeitpunkt
DCHCK per FuBA BDT_INSTANCE_SELECT und den Parameter iv_xpush_classic = ‘X’ and
iv_xpop_classic = ‘X’ eine neue BDT Instanz zu erzeugen. Leider konnten wir diese
Lösung nicht endgültig zum Laufen bekommen, da es immer Probleme beim
Übertragen der globalen Speicher der einzelnen BDT Instanzen gab.
Ich hoffe Ihr könnt hier eure Implementierungen kurz beschreiben, dass wir
eine Best Practice Ansatz für das Thema finden können
BR/VG
Dominik

Can I insert the name poperty of the RequestedByUser related object of the parent Change Request workitem in a review activity email notification template?

I am working on a SCSM change control workflow driven by email.
A lot of my work is based on the information found in this post:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/servicemanager/archive/2012/04/03/using-data-properties-from-the-parent-work-items-in-activity-email-templates.aspx#pi158453=4
This is an excellent post to which my Internet searches continually return. The workflow is about 90% complete.
My question is can I insert the properties of a related object of the parent workitem in a workflow email notification?
For example, I want to include the name property of the RequestedByUser related object of the parent workitem object in a review activity notification.

Thank you for your reply. I have confirmed my template is using a projection that includes the parent workitem and requested by user. Where I am having trouble is the notification template syntax used to call the properties of the related
object of the parent workitem. The picker in the GUI won't show that related object, so I have no example to follow. I hope this reply makes sense!

When I open an old pages doc in new pages 5.0 objects in table cells are removed. how can I stop this?

When I open an old pages doc with new pages 5.0 - objects, specifically pictures, in table cells are removed. Is there a way I can stop this?

nigel32,
Gavin is right. You are bound to lose images in tables of docs made in previous versions. If you wish to continue using Pages 5.0 to edit docs from previous versions, you can try re-inserting your images using the following method:
1. Click on the cell you want to insert to.
2. Select CELL on the right contextual menu.
4. Click on FILL and select IMAGE FILL.
5. Click CHOOSE then select the image you need from Finder.
6. Tweak the appearance using the SCALE slider or drop down menu.

Why related objects with indirection are selected when deleting an object

myCompany object is related to one-to-many addresses through indirection.
Using uow.deleteObject(myCompany) shows that when commiting, before actually removing the object and its privately owned related objects, toplink select these related objects from database (SELECT FROM ...) . Why is it necessary to perform this latter operation ?
Thanks in advance for your reply,
Chris

This could be possible, but TopLink would also need to update its cache. In addition, there are a number of other things TopLink must do on each of the individual objects - such as search them for privately owned relations, delete ordering, firing any events and including them in changesets for cache synchronization and auditing purposes. There could be more, but they all require that TopLink find the privately owned objects before it attempts to delete them.
I will enter a feature request though so that this option can be configured, as it might improve performance for users who do not use other options mentioned above.
Best Regards,
Chris

Setting a related object value from an update

Hi - Is there anyway without custom integration servic to set a field value of a related object based on the update to a
record (e.g. lead record)?
For example, I want to keep track of a user's total open leads for assignment purposes. So ideally I'd like to update the
user's custom lead count field, everytime my leads get closed or created.

I believe this would require a custom web service program. I would recommend that you post this question in the CRM On Demand Integration Development forum.

Heads up: (Zevoneer, pac, et al) new I&B-related KB doc

hiya!
a brand new I&B-related KB doc showed up recently. just in case you hadn't seen it yet, i thought i'd drop a link in here to it:
iTunes: Backup DVDs from my Mac don't work on my Windows PC
love, b

more to add to my mile long list of bookmarks :>)
i know that feeling ...
another one got updated later on the day (in your advice fields, if not necessarily on an importing & burning topic). it's not one i use much, so i'm not sure what the changes have been:
iTunes: Moving your iTunes Music folder
(i tend to use MacMuse's user tip when necessary ... i think Niel is probably our other possible authority on changes to this doc.)

Why Synonym becomes INVALID when changes are made on the related object ?

Hi all,
WHY SYNONYMS becomes invalid when changes are made on related OBJECTS ?
Is there any specific reasons for this.?
Is there any method or procedures to make the synonym VALID as soon as the we perform any alteration on the related object.
Thanks
Himabala

Synonym will be validated when it is accessed, no need to take an action.

New to EJB3.0 - Object relational mapping

Hi I am new to EJB 3.0...
I just wanted to ask the following questions:
1) Do you have to create new entity for each datbase table manually, or is there a tool?
2) I see you can specify relationships e.g. @many-to-many does this also have to be done manually.

manjit84 wrote:
Hi I am new to EJB 3.0...
I just wanted to ask the following questions:
1) Do you have to create new entity for each datbase table manually, or is there a tool?
I dont know .. but netbeans can do that .. either create an entity class that creates a table or create an entity class from a table.
2) I see you can specify relationships e.g. @many-to-many does this also have to be done manually.from my experience .. you have to do it like that i.e 'manually'
ochomo

Error while explicit creating relation object

Hello all ...
i am using forms6i i.e. 'Forms [32 Bit] Version 6.0.8.8.0 (Production)'
on Windows NT.
it is not such a big problem, but ofcource affecting work.
i am modifying a form that has a master block and five child blocks,
while i am trying to create another child block with implicit relation,
it creates block but wizard does not goes to next screen i.e to choose
canvas etc., rather it creates only block and comes to object navigator,
and does not create any relation and hence no associated triggers.
even if i try to create a relation explicitly, it gives error:
'Error while parsing join condition.'
while i am sure the join condition is allright.
when i tried to create a new form with exactly these blocks, it works
fine. the situation is only arising when modifing a form.
if anyone can suggest a solution, i'll be thankful.
regards,
aamir.

Hi Yash,
Check out the below thread:
[activation of the Datastore Object.|error in ODS activation/export datasource;
Hope it helps you!
Please reward points if helpful
Manish

New ID of related object in PO13

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for