New installation: signature is invalid

I did a search for 'signature' in topic titles and didn't find the answer to this.
I installed the new 7.15 archlinux onto a SD card, and booted, reached this line from the instructions:
pacstrap /mnt base base-devel
signature from such and such is invalid.
i checked my date, and it is 2012 UTC Jul 28 09:26
I assume this shouldn't happen, but I don't why, or how to proceed from here. Any suggestions ? Thank you

i'll type it out:
pacstrap /mnt base
long list of targets (acl, archlinux-keyring, etc)
total installed size 410.52 MiB
proceed with installation (y/n)
(114/114) checking package integrity
error: getteext: signature from "Tobias Powalowski <[email protected]>" is invalid
error: failed to commit transaction (invalid or corrupted package)
Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded
==> ERROR: failed to install packages to new root
I downloaded the .iso and the md5 was correct
I guess the packages were downloaded but for some reason the signature was invalid
, thanks for help

Similar Messages

Appending new pages to signed documents now makes Acrobat 9 and Reader 9 mark signature as invalid

Hello!
I have developed a service that appends additional pages to existing PDF documents. Some of the documents the service works on happen to be signed. As the service appends the pages using incremental updates, the signed contents are left untouched. This makes Acrobat 8 and Reader 8 display the signature state as "valid with subsequent changes" which is ok and no one complains about.
Now along come Acrobat 9 and Reader 9, and all of a sudden the signature state is "invalid" which my users do complain about. Telling them that inspecting the signature state details they can see that the signed content still is untouched and the actual change is recognized to be some appended pages, doesn't help either as they in turn forward the documents to their customers who don't accept the documents if the Adobe Reader sais the signatures are invalid.
Does anyone know a way new pages can be added to a signed document without having the new Adobe program versions choke on them?
Even a hint that involves adding some flag to the original unsigned document or the signature itself would help as the users in question can tweak those processes. Due to the nature of the workflow, though, signing unfortunately must happen before my service can add the new pages.
Best regards, Mikel.
By the way, the signatures in question are regular approval signatures, nothing fancy, especially not certifying signatures (which indeed can forbid any changes or at least any changes but some form fill-ins and annotations)...

Hi Fritz,
In the interest of full disclosure, I got the answer to the problem from one of my distinguished colleagues, I'm just the messenger in this case.
The problem is that the form adds some items to the Arzneispezialität / Zusatztext combobox which are there during signing but the form doesn’t remember that it did this on the next form open.
Since this field is included in the MDP+ signature and the field has changed in the re-opened version vs. the signed version, the MDP+ signature becomes invalid.
XFA has a feature that remembers these kinds of things for you but it is turned it OFF. Please open the attached screen shot to see the control in question.
So, you can either (1) turn this feature ON (Automatically), or (2) write some script to clear the combobox items prior to signing or (3) write some script to repopulate the combobox items on the subsequent open to match the items that were there during signing.
Steve

[SOLVED] GPGME error after chrooting for new installs

There is another thread about this topic, but it is marked as solved. But obviously this error is not solved because new installs are failing.
The problem: after installing the base system with pacstrap and chrooting into the system, there are some very ugly errors when trying to install any additional packages.
Pacman gives the following output:
warning: GPGME error: Invalid crypto engine
File XYZ is corrupted (invalid vor corrupted package (PGP signature)
Do you want to delete it?
Since i installed arch just a few days ago on the same system with different SSD, this error seems to come from the server side. But i am no expert at all, so i have no idea what's wrong.
I tried to delete the etc/pacman.d/gnupg folder and running pacman-key --init, but this is not working.
Last edited by tumas (2014-01-13 18:37:18)

Update the system from the install disk with pacman --root <mountpoint> -Syu. The problem is that you installed at exactly the wrong time, when all of the packages that use gcrypt were updated but libgcrypt wasn't.
Last edited by Scimmia (2014-01-13 18:29:37)

Pacman issues for new installation

Hi Folks,
New to Arch. Core x64 iso. Carried out the installation okay using the Beginners guide wiki.
Having trouble with pacman to the point it is driving me bananas. This is the Post installation part of the beginners guide we are talking about, so there is no GUI involved.
Network is fine. Unchecked mirrors in the mirrorlist near to my location. Run the following without any errors.
# pacman Syy
So chosen mirrors are okay so now we go on to update the system.
I ran # pacman -Syu
upgraded pacman on the first run as expected, and was asked to run pacman-key --init. Run up against the message...
Not enough random bytes available. Please do some other work to give the OS a chance to collect more entropy.
System hung there. Had to force reboot (Ctl Alt Del).
After a reboot, tried running pacman -Syu again. This time it pulled a lot of upgrades. I continued with the proposed up grades only for each to fail with a generated key failed message.
Went over to windows and a VM, and went through the installation there to see if I could get a fix.
This time system is 32 bit 686. went through same procedure. got to the same point with the same error message.
Googled and found this post...https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=128340.
There are a number of proposed solutions. None of which seemed to apply to GUI less new installation.
While system was hung looking for more entropy, I started entering numerous Ctl^X inputs at the keyboard. After a while it completed. I ran pacman-key --init again and and it seemed to complete okay. No errors any way.
So I then issued the command pacman -Syu again.
This time it downloaded a s*** load of updates, Checked the downloads, cant remember the exact details. Then came up with the message no packages were installed due to files being duplicate or conflicting.
There were numerous updates. How can I do the first time update. Help required. Remember no GUI.

Sorry for the delay in replying.
Okay, I moved locale.sh to tmp and renamed locale.sh.old
run the updates, there were errors, but since I was on a non GUI console, couldnot scroll back to see what messages the errors produced. There was a kernel upgrade in the package list. On reboot, system couldnot find the filesystem or kernel or boot partition. System is now goosed.
Reading more from wiki and threads posted here. I decided I needed the latest snapshot. Also read somewhere that the best idea was to do a network install.
so I started again with a new network install. Went okay or so I thought. Remember I am in the installation here. Downloaded the packages for just a basic core set up.
When the installation began installing the packages, the PgP signature problem raised it's head again. Now this is the installation procedure here over the network with the latest snapshot...
archlinux-2012.03.07_14-30-01-netinstall-i686
All I ahve done is let the installer run, selecting source, set location and time, prepared the hard disk. I choose grub, configured the network okay. The installation process then downloaded the core files but installation failed.
Messages...immediately after download.
Checking package integrity
Warning: Public keyring not found; have you run pacman-key --init
Error: linux-api-headers key F999...blah..blah unknown
Error: key F999...blah..blah could not be looked up remotely.
All other packages have similar errors, the procedure finishes with the following...
Error failed to commit transaction (invalid or corrupt package (PGP Signature))
Package installation failed.
What is going on? This is the installation process, no way to access the filesystem as yet, not that I know of anyway.
Other people installing Arch over the network must be experiencing the same problem.
Does Arch actually work
Running install on VMWare on Windows.

Network card not found after new installation [SOLVED]

I broke my filesystem on my Asus UL80V series laptop in trying to solve problems related to the latest glibc update, so decided to do a clean re-install. I had an installation disk at hand: 2009.08 with kernel 2.6.30.4-1 (which is supposed to have the module for my ath9k network device). However after a successful installation (including all the files from base-dev), my network device is not recognised:
dhcpcd: eth0: interface not found or invalid
although network connectivity (wired and wireless) worked perfectly before the installation attempt.
This happened yesterday (17th) and I have been scouring the web since trying to find out what the cause of this problem is, without luck.
I also burned a new installation CD with the latest stable version, but no luck there, either! Got a message at the beginning informing me that the install requires 64 Mb memory, although my laptop has 4 Gb.
I should say, the device is there and working:
lspci | grep Net
gives
02:00.0 Network controller: Atheros Communications Inc. AR9285 Wireless Network Adapter (PCI-Express) (rev 01)
I also did
modprobe ath9k
just to make sure. No luck.
Any help will be appreciated.
thanks
thea
Last edited by thea (2012-07-23 23:59:16)

Argh, ip may not be around in the 2009 image really ;-) .. Use "ifconfig" instead..
But: I meanwhile cross-checked your ath9k: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Dri … h9k_driver
and it does not sound encouraging for the kernel you have there.
The image is far too old anyway, if you ask me (would be a darn hazzle to get that uptodate I am sure). Pity you get that memory error with the 2011 one. Maybe check forums on that. Sounds very strange, I am not aware of any post I read.
If you can burn another CD, you can try the recent ISOs as well: http://releng.archlinux.org/isos/
Beware that the ones from July dont have the AIF setup anymore.

Signature is invalid after signing and saving

Hi,
I've been messing around with this problem for days and I don't find a solution.
I've a PDF document I created in LiveCycle Designer ES 8.2. This document will get populated with data from an XFDF file. After that, user can input data and data will be retrieved via Webservices too.
After finishing, the user has to sign the document and then it will be saved back to the server with a submit function.
When I reopen the signed document (or even after I click "save" without sending back to the server and reopening it), the signature is invalid. When I click on "Compare signed version to current version", I get the report "The pages are identical" and when I close the report, the signature isn't invalid anymore. Acrobat then writes: "At least one signature requires validating".
There are some JavaScript functions in the document which may cause the problem, but I already eliminated most of them, with docReady events, so they won't be executed on start.
Is there a way to debug the PDF document?
I've found some debugging hint on the internet from 2003 or 2004, but I can't even find the menus right now, so I think, there must be a new way for this in Acrobat 9.
I hope, someone can help me, this problem really drives me crazy.
Thanks.
Fritz

Hi Fritz,
In the interest of full disclosure, I got the answer to the problem from one of my distinguished colleagues, I'm just the messenger in this case.
The problem is that the form adds some items to the Arzneispezialität / Zusatztext combobox which are there during signing but the form doesn’t remember that it did this on the next form open.
Since this field is included in the MDP+ signature and the field has changed in the re-opened version vs. the signed version, the MDP+ signature becomes invalid.
XFA has a feature that remembers these kinds of things for you but it is turned it OFF. Please open the attached screen shot to see the control in question.
So, you can either (1) turn this feature ON (Automatically), or (2) write some script to clear the combobox items prior to signing or (3) write some script to repopulate the combobox items on the subsequent open to match the items that were there during signing.
Steve

Im going to kill my self. (The signature was invalid)

"The binary you uploaded was invalid. The signature was invalid, or it was not signed with an Apple submission certificate."
It´s like a week im trynig diffrent tutorial, forums. NOTHING. The only option I have now is ScreenSharing via iChat.
Please somebody help me. Pleeeaaase. PM me if you have to time to help me and I will send you my iChat username.
I would really appreciate it.

It can be tough, but don't give up - it will work. I've been through this for 5 apps now, and it can be total frustration. Here's what works for me:
-Quit Xcode
-First, delete all your distribution profiles from ~/Library/MobileDevice/Provisioning Profiles/
-Log into Portal - double, triple check your app ID (must not be * if using push)
-Regenerate dist profile. *Do not modify an existing profile* Create a new one.
-Download and manually place the file in ~/Library/MobileDevice/Provisioning Profiles/
-Launch Xcode
-Double, triple check all your configurations in Build Info. Check Base SDK, Code signing identity. Check all the configurations, including ones you're not using.
-Repeat this step for the target.
-Clean and build.
Beleive it or not, this process has actually become MUCH more manageable than it was a year ago. The bottom line is : if you have problems with a profile, completely remove all evidence of its existence and try again.
Also, you can check if the signing worked without uploading. From the CLI : codesign -vvvv filename
If you are dealing with Certificates, always reboot after installing. Good luck.

Application failed codesign verification. The signature was invalid? Please help

Hi App developers
Has anyone got a solution to this error when using Application uploader to ituneconnect?
Application failed codesign verification. The signature was invalid, or it was not signed with an Apple submission certificate.
I've created new provisioning profiles and a new certificate but still get the same error.
Any help much appreciated.

Hi, I'm not sure which Adobe Forum you would need, but I don't think it's the Flash Player Forum. Go here to find the other Forums that may be helpful to you.
Use the drop down arrow at "Select Forum" http://forums.adobe.com/index.jspa
Thanks,
eidnolb

ITunes signature is invalid??!!

I am trying to download that latest version of iTunes, but it keeps saying that it can't download because my iTunes signature is invalid. What does this mean and how can I fix it?

That one suggests the installer has gotten damaged during the download.
I'd first try downloading an installer from the Apple website using a different web browser:
http://www.apple.com/itunes/download/
If you use Firefox instead of IE for the download (or vice versa), do you get a working installer?

The installer-execution problem "invalid dependent index"

On a target machine when I run a new installer that includes the LabVIEW and Vision 2011 RTE's, it gets past all the legal boilerplate and agreements and just as soon as it’s about to get to doing anything useful, I get an “Invalid dependent Index” & "No details avalable" error popup. A click of the OK button found on that window then terminates the installer.
Has anyone else seen this? Both the development machine and the target machine are running 32-bit WinXP SP3.
( BTW, “OK” is rarely if ever really “OK”. I always change all NI dialog buttons under my control to use “Acknowledge” instead. )

I found that by cleaning off all old NI software from the target machine, I could get the new installer to run to completion properly.

New Installation on Ubuntu 6.10 - logon denied, unable to login at all.

I have successfully installed Oracle XE under Ubuntu 6.10.
When I attempt to login via APEX using system and my entered password I get Invalid Login Creditials.
When I attempt to login to sqlplus as either system or sys with my entered password I get logon denied.
I know I'm typing in the same password, and I've gone through the entire reinstallation process just to be double sure.
Has anybody experienced this problem with a new installation?
What are my option now, while my installation appears valid, with listener, processes and APEX home page operational I don't have any ideas.
Any help really appreciated.

ORA-01031: insufficient privilegesThis may happen in two situations :
1. your oracle user is not member of dba group, or
2. within sqlnet.ora file, in $ORACLE_HOME/network/admin you have a line like this :
SQLNET.AUTHENTICATION_SERVICES=(NONE)
Either add your oracle user to dba group, or remove/comment the above line.

Lync 2013 to CUPS RCC - Record-Route signature is invalid

Hi all,
             I have a Lync 2013 environment and I'm trying to implement RCC with a CUPS 10 environment.
On the Lync side, I have run the following commands:
$tcpRoute = New-CsStaticRoute -TCPRoute -Destination 10.10.120.54 -Port 5060 -MatchUri cups.domain.com -ReplaceHostInRequestUri $true
Set-CsStaticRoutingConfiguration -Route @{Add=$tcpRoute}
CsTrustedApplicationpool -Identity 10.10.120.54 -Registrar LyncFE.domain.com–Site 1 –TreatAsAuthenticated $True –ThrottleAsServer $True –RequiresReplication $False
New-CsTrustedApplication -ApplicationID RCCGateway-1 –TrustedApplicationPoolFqdn 10.10.120.54 -Port 5060 -EnableTcp
Set-CsRegistrar registrar:LyncFE.domain.com -SipServerTcpPort 5060
on the test user I have set
Set “Telephony” to:
Remote call control
Set Line uri to:
tel:<ext>;phone-context=dialstring
Set Line server uri to:
sip:<username>@cups.domain.com
In the SIP logs I get the following (I have bolded the bits I think are important)
TL_INFO(TF_PROTOCOL) [0]1FDC.1670::02/19/2015-05:35:53.687.001b274e (SIPStack,SIPAdminLog::ProtocolRecord::Flush:ProtocolRecord.cpp(265))[1932678887] $$begin_record
Trace-Correlation-Id: 1932678887
Instance-Id: 45F
Direction: incoming
Peer: 10.10.120.54:5060
Message-Type: response
Start-Line: SIP/2.0 200 OK
From: "Test ADL"<sip:[email protected]>;tag=224a04a9f9;epid=fa015fbbdb
To: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=29e9c078-ce4a5e7
Call-ID: 669e8717f0a0487fb09aed392d84f589
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Contact: <sip:[email protected]:5060;transport=TCP>
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.70.11.70:52575;received=10.70.11.70;branch=z9hG4bKE005ADB2.742BA66DD49B1869;branched=FALSE;ms-internal-info="aaweLh0WVLdGLzdpabeIHETcyFKD5xJlVJz_tnBJ0l-7ptpit0RW23IQAA", SIP/2.0/TLS 10.70.20.36:52402;ms-received-port=52402;ms-received-cid=1A00
Record-Route: <sip:[email protected]:5060;maddr=10.10.120.54;transport=tcp;lr>,<sip:LyncFE.domain.com;transport=tcp;opaque=state:T;lr;ms-route-sig=aaF2AA9BciRLZcYZPN0XasMmn8g4LiFd4j7Fdcxg6R6uRtpit0mCXPOAAA>;tag=7E7648A7380D372597F42EAEAECC07A2
Content-Length: 190
Content-Type: application/csta+xml
Message-Body: <?xml version="1.0"?>?<RequestSystemStatusResponse xmlns="??<systemStatus>normal</systemStatus>?</RequestSystemStatusResponse">http://www.ecma-international.org/standards/ecma-323/csta/ed3">??<systemStatus>normal</systemStatus>?</RequestSystemStatusResponse>?
$$end_record
TL_ERROR(TF_SECURITY) [0]1FDC.1670::02/19/2015-05:35:53.687.001b2b66 (SIPStack,SIPAdminLog::WriteSecurityEvent:SIPAdminLog.cpp(319))[1932678887] $$begin_record
Text: Record-Route signature is invalid
Result-Code: 0xc3e93f1e SIPPROXY_E_INVALID_RECORD_ROUTE
Connection-ID: 0x1300
Peer-IP: 10.10.120.54:5060
Peer: 10.10.120.54:5060
SIP-Start-Line: SIP/2.0 200 OK
SIP-Call-ID: 669e8717f0a0487fb09aed392d84f589
SIP-CSeq: 1 INVITE
$$end_record
TL_WARN(TF_DIAG) [0]1FDC.1670::02/19/2015-05:35:53.687.001b2b74 (SIPStack,SIPAdminLog::WriteDiagnosticEvent:SIPAdminLog.cpp(805))[1932678887] $$begin_record
Severity: warning
Text: Routing error occurred; check Result-Code field for more information
Result-Code: 0xc3e93f1e SIPPROXY_E_INVALID_RECORD_ROUTE
SIP-Start-Line: SIP/2.0 200 OK
SIP-Call-ID: 669e8717f0a0487fb09aed392d84f589
SIP-CSeq: 1 INVITE
Peer: 10.10.120.54:5060
$$end_record
I have not had any luck finding the solution to this as yet - and any suggestions as to what I have done wrong would be appreciated.
Edit - apparently bold doesn't work.... sorry - it works in the editor, but not when I save the post! Please look at the ":record-route" line in the first log and the result code in the next two entries.

Hi Ben, thank you for your update.
To clarify, the
device=SEP0123456789F is an example, you have to change it with the correct Cisco IP-Phone serial number used by your user.
I've checked every step of your procedure and I've not found any issue, I've used the same procedure with a Cisco CUPS 10 and everything works fine.
Please be sure to check this on Cisco:
- the MatchURI need to be equal to the Cisco Unified Presence Domain
- on the CUCM the CTI Account (default is CtiGw) nned to have CTI controll of every phone (Standard CTI Allow Control of Phone supporting Connected Xfer and conf) and Supporting Rollover Mode
- it's important that the "Standard CTI Secure Connection" group is NOT associated to the CtiGw account (if it's associated it force the connection to TLS).
Let me know.
Regards
Luca
Luca Vitali | MCITP Lync/Exchange | snom Certified Engineer | Sonus SBC1000 Engineer

Application failed codesign verification. The signature was invalid, or was not signed with an Apple

Folks ,
I'm developing and iOS app in Flash but when I'm gonna upload it via application loader this error pop up "Application failed codesign verification. The signature was invalid, or was not signed with an Apple submission certificate."
I've renew my certificates, etc for several times but still have a same problem,
look to get your suggestion

Follow the walk-thru and links in TN 2250 (recently updated) and TN 2294 Code Validation and Submission Issues for iOS (recently added) and iTunes Connect Help (new).

Application failed code signing verification. The signature was invalid

Hi,
Earlier we have created iPhone app with adobe air and uploaded it to iOS store. Now we have updated the app and used a new .p12 file and it is generated from a new CSR file and created the build. But while uploading the build from application loader it is giving the following error.
"Application failed code signing verification. The signature was invalid contains disallowed entitlements or it was not signed with an iPhone distribution Certificate"
With the same certificate file we have uploaded two more apps developed in HTML5, jQueryMobile and Phonegap. These apps should not effect while we upload the Adobe air iPhone app.
Please help us to fix the issue.

I am fairly certain the issue is you are submitting an update to an existing app with a new cert. The other apps work just fine because they are not updates, but new submissions to the app store. You will need to use the same certs that you used with the initial submission.

I have itunes directory on an external hard drive and want to direct a new installation of itunes on windows 8 to use it. I tried holding down ctrl and clicking itunes and after many tries got it to work one time. When I went back in later it had reverted

I have itunes directory on an external hard drive and want to direct a new installation of itunes on windows 8 to use it. I tried holding down ctrl and clicking itunes and after many tries got it to work one time. When I went back in later it had reverted back to a blank version of itunes and I cant get ctrl to work again. Any other ideas?

This is sometimes caused by a problem with the iTunesPrefs.xml file, normally found at C:\Users\<User>\AppData\Local\Apple Computer\iTunes\iTunesPrefs.xml. Try dragging this to the desktop and trying again.
Alternatively the problem may be that you have McAfee AV and it is preventing iTunes from updating the same file and thus causing the problem. See Why does iTunes delete my itunesprefs.xml? for details.
tt2

New installation: signature is invalid

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for