New MacPro 8 Core 12gig or 16 gig of ram?

Hello All,
I want to upgrade my memory but I am wondering what to buy? Should I get the (6) 2gigs? or the (8) 2gigs. I keep reading about not to fill up all 8 but only 6 for better performance?
Or should i just get the (4) 2gig each stick? This way I only loose 4 (1)gig chips. I am so lost.
Or should i just fill it up with (4) 2 gigs and leave (4) 1 gigs to give me a total of 12gig?
Thanks

I'm not an expert in AE (I use Motion more), but you're right: AE doesn't use more than 3GB +per render instance+. That's the key. AE CS4 will use all the RAM you have if you are maxing out all 8 processors - up to 3GB a thread I believe, when rendering. Bare Feats has more info on this, so check out that site.
Now just building your project, previewing, etc. doesn't use more than 3GB AFAIK, nor does any 32-bit program. But when you run compressor, or the new AE multiprocessor render engine in CS4, it spawns multiple 32-bit instances, each of which can use (potentially) 3GB of RAM. That's where the real power of 8-core computing comes into play and, frankly, is one of the few reasons to own such a beast. That's also where your RAM comes in... the more the better. Where you have to think is whether 6 sticks being faster than 8 outweighs the advantage of having 12GB vs 16. (32 seems prohibitively expensive right now as 4GB DDR3 modules are insanely expensive).
In general use, we're lucky to get use of 4-cores, never mind 2. These Mac Pros and their extra processors and RAM are best used for insane multitasking (multiple programs that use a few GB each and a processor or two), or mega rendering/calculation programs like AE, Compressor, Mathematica, XCode, etc. Personally, I render a lot of HD video into H.264 from ProRes. The MacPro is a no brainer in that regard.
vtonangi wrote:
Controller - this should probably be a new thread but you sound like you know what you are talking about. Currently I have 8 GB of RAM, and I was thinking if I should get another 8 GB to make AE render more quickly. But I read that AE really doesn't use more then 3 GB - so now I'm confused. I have a pretty powerful machine (at least I think it is) Quad-Core Intel Xeon with 8 GB of RAM, but some of the effects I use in my compositions just take forever for a quick ram preview. Would getting another 8 GB of RAM help this? What are you preference settings on AE CS4 regarding previewing and rendering? I would really appreciate any enlightenment you can give to me on this issue. Thanks.

Similar Messages

  • Illustrator CC 2014 running EXTREMELY slow on brand new 6 Core Mac Pro with 64Gbs of Ram. This can't be right :(

    Hi,
    I've just picked up a brand new 6 core Mac Pro and I am having some serious lag issues with Illustrator CC 2014. I am just trying to select relatively simple objects (an illustration of the side of a coin) and there is a massive delay between when I click on an object and when it actually becomes selected.
    Someone please tell me they know how to fix this? Please

    after the two fixes above in illustrator cc Im still experiencing
    file open - nothing happens
    file place nothing happens
    fix - quit illustrator and restart - open file from the folder lol
    PS CC
    A wierd warning popping when I want to open a file nothing opens just the warning
    fix quit out and start again
    for those of you out there in yur 40s and this is your career you started like me on photoshop 2 or 3 on an lc 6/100 60 and even on the quadras lol
    this is the first time Ive had seen so many bugs in adobe software
    why I bought it the curve tool astute dont have a curve tool and I work alot with them and the funky title branding it looks cool visual consumer glutton lol
    so yeah now going to look at how to stop my monthly subscription  will proabably have to go to that forum next lol
    an d evert back to CS6 im outputting to many jobs to have these hold ups

  • HT3161 I have a 27" mac running with a 3.4 ghz core i7 and 16 gigs of ram and using the latest logic. I have a composition consisting of 7 audio tracks and 4 software instruments and 4 plugins on 4 tracks so why is my CPU spiking ?

    I'm running a 27" imac with a 3.4ghz core i7 processor and 16 gb of ram.... In logic I have a project with 7 audio tracks with various plugins running and 4 software instruments which incidentally are not playing all the way through the track...my CPU spikes even if the project is paused...why is this happening on such a high end machine.....wasting my money again seems to spring to mind !!

    Did you read this support article?
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ht3161

  • MacPro 1,1 vs 2.93GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i7 vs New MacPro

    Greetings all,
    I have a friend who has a MacPro 1,1 with 4 Gigs of RAM. He has 4 500 gig drives which I have striped and mirrored the drives giving him 1 TB of space. He is an avid photographer and having recently retired he is using up his available space at a rapid rate. He also complains about about speed. He is now running CS5 and Aperture 3. We have been talking about possible solutions. (I have not included the cost of a new backup drive for his off site backup.)
    Option 1 - Upgrade the MacPro with 4 2TB drives and 16 gigs ram - $2,000
    Option 2 - Buy a 27" iMac with i7 core, 2TB drive, 256 Gig SSD and 16 Gigs of ram - $3,699.00
    Option 3 - Buy a 27" iMac with i7 core, 2TB drive, 256 Gig SSD and 16 Gigs of ram - $2,949.00
    Option 4 - Buy a new MacPro, Two 2.4GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon, 16 gig ram, 4 - 2TB drives striped and mirrored. - $5,299.00
    In reality money is not an option but I question putting 5K into a new MacPro. I have been out of the support business for a while now and would greatly appreciate any guidance you guys could provide.
    Thanks, Sam

    Forget that "0+1" setup. Yes, some people used it, not a good idea, not really supported.
    4 x 1GB was minimum.
    Apple Store Specials has 2010 4-core 2.8GHz for $2049.
    Please dont' consider 2.4GHz 8-core. Poor move.
    Apple's SSDs are slow and well, terrible performance.
    Your $2000 doesn't add up:
    4 x 2TB = $750
    4 x 4GB = $650
    Leaves you with $240 for a nice 120GB SSD
    The hard drives are something that would be needed, and the RAM, no matter what you do.
    Also, throw in ATI 5770 upgrade for 1,1, or the 5870 if buying new. So $200.
    So yes, even new you would end up spending a bit on RAM and drives, and throw in the cost of upgrading software.
    You might want to play with adding 3-5 x 1TB drives and one SSD along with 16GB RAM (depends on work flow) and ATI 5770 for about $1400.
    Some have upgraded their processor to 5355s for an 8-core @ 2.66 (and slightly more efficient processor over the ones originally included).
    And do replace and break up that frankenstein RAID.

  • I have Ps CS4.  I run Apple OS X 10.9.5  on a new MacPro 3GHz 8-core Intel Xeon E5 - 64 GB.    I hardly ever use CS4 ( preferring Elements for my low level needs), but I now want to use it's function for stitching together a landscape.  I fire it up and g

    I have Ps CS4.  I run Apple OS X 10.9.5  on a new MacPro 3GHz 8-core Intel Xeon E5 - 64 GB.    I hardly ever use CS4 ( preferring Elements for my low level needs), but I now want to use it's function for stitching together a landscape.  I fire it up and get Error 150:30 with the suggestion to contact you  - hence this message

    I have Ps CS4.  I run Apple OS X 10.9.5  on a new MacPro 3GHz 8-core Intel Xeon E5 - 64 GB.    I hardly ever use CS4 ( preferring Elements for my low level needs), but I now want to use it's function for stitching together a landscape.  I fire it up and get Error 150:30 with the suggestion to contact you  - hence this message

  • Internal drives from my older Macpro keeping my new 8 core from booting

    I am upgrading from an older dual core Macpro to a new 8 core and found that if I install any of the internal drives from my older Macpro in the new 8 core the computer won't boot. The drives just have data on them no applications of operating software. The older boot drive won't let the 8 core boot either if its installed.
    Anyone know if this is to be expected and if so why? I will have to copy 3 - 1 TB drives if they can't be directly used in the new computer.
    Thanks

    I've seen a severe corrupt directory cause Macs to refuse to boot from any drive, even from CD/DVDs making it hard to repair and requiring a USB/FW case to repair/format or recovery files.
    During startup the system has to scan for valid boot drives even though startup disk tells it where to try to boot from. 
    Also yours by default boots in 64-bit mode.
    Once you have the files you need copied over, why not just reformat and clone your current system.

  • What's the Best Photoshop CS5 Scratch Disk Setup for New MacPro 12 Core?

    Hello all...
    I'm awaiting delivery of a new MacPro 12 Core with 16GB of RAM and a 512GB SSD drive (Bay1) + 2TB (Bay2) + 2TB (Bay3). Normally I would partition about 60GB of one of the 2TB drives to make an exclusive scratch disk for Photoshop to ensure optimum performance.... with the new spec MacPro and especially the new 512GB SSD, do I still need to do this..?
    Any suggestions of comments most welcome... as I want to try to get my new machine set up as best I can before I start copying over my existing data and filling hard drives etc. Photoshop CS5 and Quark Express 8 are my two core apps that I use daily.
    Regards,
    Anthony MacCarthy
    Irish MacUser and MacAddict

    ScarCrow 28 wrote:
    …Well yes, technically you've got me on that I will admit.  I'll try to rephrase to be a bit more accurate. The best scratch disk is one you don't need to rely on performance wise, by having enough RAM to handle the data performance needy tasks that would otherwise be sent to the scratch disk, when enough RAM can't be accessed by Photoshop…
    …Hows that?
    Still wrong, alas.  
    The scratch disk is used always.
    See this very short (two-message) thread:
    http://forums.adobe.com/message/2847996#2847996
    Excerpt:
    [Chris Cox writes:]
    …Photoshop needs to allocate scratch space for data, in case it needs to
    write that data to disk later -- otherwise you would randomly fail with
    "out of scratch space" in the MIDDLE of an operation…
    Furthermore, Photoshop sets the size of the scratch disk ahead of time—the instant you open an image file or create a new document—basing it on assumptions the application makes taking into account your usual, past workflow practices, your settings and the pixel dimensions of the document.
    Bottom line:  the scratch disk always plays a part.
    Do a forum search filtering the options with Chris Cox in the "Who" box, "scratch" as key word, and Photoshop Macintosh as the forum.  You'll find some enlightening reading.  Examples:
    http://forums.adobe.com/search.jspa?q=scratch&resultTypes=MESSAGE&resultTypes=COMMUNITY&pe opleEnabled=true&dateRange=all&communityID=3341&username=Chris+Cox&numResults=15&rankBy=10 001
    I'm not just insisting on arguing; I honestly want you and others to have a better Photoshop experience.  Really. 
    Wo Tai Lao Le
    我太老了

  • Best Multiprocessing setup for 24 Processor Cores & 64gb of RAM using new MacPro OSX 10.9.5.

    Whats the best Multiprocessing setup for 24 Processor Cores & 64gb of RAM using new MacPro OSX 10.9.5.
    I'm still getting an After Effects Warning: at the end of some renders saying "A frame failed to render using Render Multiple Frames Simultaneously.

    Hi Szalam,
    I'm using the latest After Effects (13.2.0.49)
    See attached some screen grabs of my setup.

  • Shake 4.1 crashes ONLY on my new 12-Core MacPro G5 , w/ Smoothcam

    Shake continues to be one of my most-used applications. Today I migrated all my applications to the new 12-Core MacPro G5 (great machine!!!)
    But there is a huge problem with Shake, ONLY when I apply the Smoothcam filter. It crashes immediately. I re-installed Shake, the latest 4.1.1 version....no luck. It's very strange. I have no issues with Shake on my Macbook Pro, nor did I have any issues with my old Power PC G5, ever! I have the full version of Final Cut Studio 3 installed on both my machines.. I thought there may be a conflict with the FCP Smothcam filter...but why does Shake not crash on my Macbook then?
    Very strange! Anyone have a thought?

    Congrats! should rock & roll and fly.
    First and foremost, you should not migrate applications.
    Sorry about that, there should be a big RED "Before you open" letter
    Intel Mac Pro is not PowerPc and there are differences such that migrating has never worked, so clean install applications (if they aren't just drag and drop).
    Mac Pro is never called G5.
    I suspect things will break, drivers will need updates, happens every time.
    When the 1st Mac Pro came out, all the storage drivers broke when there was more than 2GB RAM (so much for help following guidelines to writing drivers that they followed).
    Some things are due to new EFI firmware, others could be from the later interim build you have that is newer, and likely will see some things resolved with one or two updates to Mac OS.
    One example, a person tried 4 different well supported SATA controllers, none work, and after a lot of hair pulling, found that his system had newer firmware; had access to other Mac Pro Early 2009s where they worked fine which only made it more confusing!
    A Mac Pro that has had apps migrated from G5's will often "run as slow as my old G5 Quad" and like molasses. Even though such problem doesn't show up on MBP and others it will on Mac Pro.
    Hopefully FC Studio (3.5 in the works to use more cores?) and Shake forums and users and once vendors get their hands, and their developers, on more Mid-2010's.
    Kappy's Guide to Using Migration Assistant

  • Pointer jumps all over the screen erratically on new MacPro Quad Core

    I just powered up my new MacPro Quad Core Xeon for the first time today. For the monitor, my new Viewsonic VG2230. I noticed that my new mighty mouse was skipping all over the screen and it was hard to get the pointer on the place on the screen I wanted to click. It got much worse when I added the second monitor (Viewsonic VA1912), and didn't want to move across from one screen to another at first.
    I thought maybe it was the mouse, and put on my old Razor Pro mouse, which I know and love. Same problems. I switch USB ports still the same.
    According to Viewsonic, both monitors are compatible, and I have used the VA1912 successfully on my old PowerMac. I thought it was odd that the number of screens affected the problem, which is why I am concentrating on the monitors, but I wonder if it isn't a problem with my Mac.
    Any ideas?

    Hello g:
    Welcome to Apple discussions.
    I suspect a faulty mouse. However, try two things first. Trash a preference file (com.apple.bluetooth.plist) and restart. Reset the PRAM:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1379
    Second, after assuring Apple this really was a problem, i got the ultimate insult. "If you would like to lodge a technical support ticket, we will need your credit card. This call will cost you $150.00."
    You see, I bought this thing four months ago. Apparently you only get a 90 day free call period. After that you're warranty is actually a cost per call scenario…..
    There is no Apple charge for a warranty issue and the mouse has a one year warranty. Call Applecare back (or take it to a store if they have one close to you). Unless I am badly mistaken, Apple will replace the mouse and pay for shipping both ways (I had one fail a couple of years ago myself). Do identify the call as a warranty issue.
    Barry

  • Original 23" cinema display and new 23"display with new 8 core MacPro

    I am posting this experience to help others with similar questions.
    I just upgraded my tower from a dual 2.7 G5 to a new 8 core Mac Pro. I am using 2 23" cinema displays. One is an original first generation display (ADC connector) and the second is a newer 23" aluminum cased display.
    The original CD needs to use the ACD to DVI converter and has to be plugged into the DVI port on the Radeon 4870 card. Using the mini-display to DVI convertor will not work. The newer display will work in either port. Both displays now work as they did before...no issues.
    I hope this clarifies the situation for others with older displays

    Aaah, thanks again Apple! So that's why they modded the videocard, to sell more new displays.
    We got a set of fresh mac pro's yesterday, all fitted with the ATI Radeon 4870. I've just fitted it to our (< 1 year old) DELL 2408WFP displays. Unfortunately only the one with the regular DVI connector works. The one connected to the miniDVI does not recognize the monitor at all. (using the ACD to DVI) Not in windows, not in osx. I've tried the updated ATI drivers within windows, this does not do the trick. So thanks Apple, for almost delivering a good piece of hardware and not telling anyone about this problem.
    If there's any news other then "buy new displays" i'll post it here.

  • New MacPro stock 4 core v 6 core

    Is the only difference between the two stock configurations to do with GPU?
    Since I'll be doing audio/lLogic and not video it seems sensible to get the 4 core version and have it upgraded to 6 core which works out much cheaper.
    Have I missed something?

    RatVega™ wrote:
    The new Mac Pro doesn't support storage in the way we're used to because it is physically a lot smaller. All storage except the system SSD is external. You can have pretty much any kind of storage you like, just not inside the "coffee maker."
    The external storage interfaces are USB 3.0 and Thunderbolt 2, so you can go as fast as you can afford. You will want to be looking at how your work wants its data and how fast it wants to be. USB 3.0 is lots of fast (up to 5Gbit/sec) if you're using a couple of hard drives or a single SSD per channel. Thunderbolt 2 can handle 20Gbit/s so it's where the really fast stuff goes. As The Hatter has laid out, you can get a Thunderbolt-attached PCIe card cage if you're big on PCIe-based storage (or other PCIe -based stuff.)
    My only advice is look for value; mass storage devices are usually not discarded untill they're too small.
    good luck!
    Thanks again, and to hatter too.
    Basically I use Logic with various Kontakt and VSL libraries which are housed on a LaCie 500gb firewire 800 drive ( now too small). My main issue with my 1st gen Mac Pro (12gb) is it's 2 x 2.0 Ghz processors which are running in the red and causing sytsem overloads.
    I'm not sure that I get the 'speed' thing, as either USB3 or TB are going to be way faster than FW800 which seems to be fast enough for most scenarios anyway.
    What I'm looking for is to run lots of instruments and/or audio plug-ins without overloading the system as I am now.
    The new MP with 32 or 64GB Ram is going to be a monster compared to  what I have now and it will enable me to add more and more sample libraries and audio plugs as I go.
    Obviously external SSDs would load the instruments faster but once I've loaded my template I'm really just looking for stability and glitch free operation. The only way I can achieve this now ( not 100%) is using my laptop and PC as slave computers taking some of the load off my old MP - via VEPro5.
    I presume I could even just connect my LaCie with a FW to TB/USB3 adapter and it would work? I will get faster and bigger drives anyway.
    Is it possible to even have a 50gig library on a 64 USB 3 flash stick in one of the ports?
    I suppose I am wondering, given a finite budget, if I should put the money into cores and CPU and save on Ram and storage which I can upgrade gradually.
    Sorry if I sound confused.

  • LOTS of Memory problems on new 8 core

    I just moved from my totally stable G5  running Logic Pro8 on Tiger to my new Mac Pro 8 core. I am having nothing but problems with
    low memory issues. Everything is up to date and it doesn't seem to matter if I'm in 32 or 64 bit, running reason in Rewire or not. I am having
    trouble narrowing down the problem. It seems to be random. I have seen a lot of posts about this but no real solutions. I'm thinking I got
    a bad computer. it's 2 months old. This computer has 6 gig of RAM. I have talked with lots of friends running the same systems with
    no problems. What is the latest? I have been on the phone with Apple and Sweetwater and it's all vague. A couple examples and as you can see I don't have
    that much going yet. WAY less than I could run on my G5. I have also been unable to get a second monitor to work with the mini display to DVI connector
    but it did work with mini display to VGA on the same monitor which is weird, and it seemed slow.
    (Mac Pro 8 Core Snow Leopard 10.6.8 - Logic Pro9 9.1.5 - Reason5 (tried 6 for 64 bit as well) - APOGEE Ensemble - Omnisphere, Stylus, KONTACT4,
    East West Play, Superior Drums, UAD 2 and others)

    OK. Here is a perfect example of what I am dealing with. I have a song open with a movie because I am scoring today (I never had trouble on my G5 importing and workin with movies and dialogue tracks). I have Reason open
    with one of the Reason5 Bass sounds, which takes alot of memory but again never an issue on my G5. I have TWO audio tracks with no plug-ins. Superior Drums, one kit. 1 ESX with a simple cymbal swell sound. I try and load a pad in Omnisphere and I get the below message. If I turn the bass into audio and quit Reason5 it will let
    me load the omnisphere sound, so I'm wondering how much of this is a Reason/ Rewire issue. Again never had
    trouble with this on G5, Tiger, Reason4 and Logic8. I am running at 32 bit because Reason5 is not 64 bit. Reason6 is 64 bit and even though I don't like the new interface I will pruchase it and run at 64 bit if it will
    work. Again I keep hearing different things about 64 bit and 32 bit. I'm trying both and I don't see any
    consistent change, still weird and random memory issues.

  • Can anyone help?? Another new MacPro thread....

    Hi all.
    Another person here having big issues with PP CC 2014 on the new MacPro..
    A little background;
    I've been having issues with PP for years. Previously I was a photographer, and Lightroom was my software of choice. That was a great Adobe experience, pretty faultless software really...
    Then when I moved to video it was a different story... obviously it's a whole different ballgame dealing with video files, I've not had much luck with my editing workflow!
    I was working off an underpowered PC first, then was on a few Macbook Pros. Eventually, I got the go ahead to get a new MacPro from my employer, I thought that would solve all my problems! How wrong I was!
    Even after the apparent "fix" for the GPU issues, I'm still having problems...
    I'm no Adobe basher....No one wants PP to work well more than me (Al Mooney got highly offended on Twitter after I suggested PP might be slightly less than perfect!)
    I'm hoping I might get some tips to improve performance or even a fix for the issues I'm having.
    Here's the gist of my specs, can give more if needed;
    Yosemite 10.10.2 (14C109)
    Mac Pro (Late 2013)
    3.5 GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon E5
    64 GB 1866 MHz DDR3 ECC
    AMD FirePro D700 6144 MB
    My main drive is a G RAID 8GB TB2
    So,
    My main issue is that when a sequence gets more complex, the performance dips massively, to the point where it's unusable and crashes constantly.
    The timeline freezes, the playhead is laggy, the system gets really slow to respond in general..... Maybe 15 seconds for the keyboard to respond to keypresses. (or else I need to tap spacebar twice instead of once to get it to respond). If I try to make any change on the timeline that anything more than a simple delete etc, the system can freeze and I need to force quit.
    Another symptom is that when quitting the program, often it doesn't quit properly and I need to force quit.
    The sequences I'm working on don't seem that demanding (especially give the machine I have) so it's really confusing as to what the issue is.
    We're talking videos usually in the 2 -5 minutes range. Maybe 4 video layers. Footage wise; generally 1080p XAVC from a Sony F5, some Canon 4K from a 1DC. Can PP really handle native footage, should I be transcoding??? One of the big benefits of PP is the apparent ability to handle native formats, so it's really disappointing if that's the issue....
    I do use a reasonable amount of plugins, like Izotope for denoising dialogue, the dreaded Red Giant plugins, and occasionally Red Giant Denoiser (is this the root of my problems??!). My current project has two layers keyed interviews (2 angles) and I'm using Ultrakey for that. (I bought Red Giant Primatte Keyer, but my system isn't powerful enough to run it without major issues....ridiculous!!)
    If anyone has any suggestions I'd love to hear them. I've read other threads but my issue seems different. I can't rule out that I'm making some obvious mistake in my workflow either... so any general workflow best practise tips in that regard would be good too.
    Sorry for the long thread and thanks for reading.

    Hi healyb2,
    Sorry you're experiencing this issue.
    I think I've identified one of the issues, Izotope 4 Dialogue Denoiser.....
    I've disabled it on an existing sequence and the crashes have stopped (for now).
    Let us know if these issues crop up again. You can let us know directly here: http://adobe.ly/ReportBug
    So, possibly (like Red Giant) Izotope plugins may not work usably in Premiere Pro....... which really grinds my gears......
    Actually, we work hand in hand with plug-ins developers in the realm of compatibility. Some of these plug-ins companies are quite small so you have to pay close attention to precisely what is supported for the host application. In some cases, it takes some time to catch up to the latest versions.
    why are Adobe not calling out the plugins as not usable? What about the plugin manufacturers themselves? I can't see this being a performance issue on my end...frustrating!
    That's actually up to the plug-ins manufacturers. Please communicate with them accordingly regarding compatibility. Sorry for any confusion this may have brought about.
    Thanks,
    Kevin

  • I want to use the SSD from my new 12 core in my old 4 core but the 4 core doesn't see the SSD.  Flashing file with "?".  What do I need to do?

    I spend a lot of time in a location far from home.  I bought a new MacPro 12 core to use at home and took the old 4 core to the alternate location.  I figured I could just take my hard drives back and forth instead of schlepping a whole MacPro.  The 12 core has a SSD drive to boot from and a 2 TB storage drive for photo files.  It came with Mountain Lion (10.8.2).  At the new location the 4 core does not find the SSD and won't boot.  Grey screen.  If I take the SSD out I can boot with the 2TB drive but it boots in OSX 10.6.8.  I can get by with that workaround, but I'd like to use the SSD if I can because PhotoShop runs a lot faster from it. 
    The SSD does not show up in Finder or Disk Utility when the computer is booted up with the 2TB drive.
    What do I need to do?

    ...or that the installed image on the SSD came from a model-specific version of Mac OS X that shipped with that Mac, and does not have the drivers to support a different model Macintosh, not even an older Mac Pro.
    You can install a new Mac OS X image, such as "Full Retail" 10.6.3 off a DVD in under an hour, and have it up to date and ready for production in only a little more time.
    Or you could clone 10.6.8 onto the SSD (from the other Hard Drive that does boot) in about a quarter hour.

Maybe you are looking for