New schema release, with pattern facet for strings?

Will Oracle release a new version of the schema processor soon, fully implementing pattern facet matches for strings? In accordance with the Last Call recommendation? Or will there be a wait while W3C puts together its release draft later this Summer?
Anybody know of any schema processors out there that validate to spec?
(XMLSPY does a good job with the Last Call spec, but only within its own framework).
Thanks.

Richard,
I have just applied patch to upgrade from Portal 3.0.9 to 3.0.9.8.1 (Patch applied to loginserver and portal schema) and the External Applications that were previously set up have gone from the portlet.
Does this relate to your note at the bottom:
"Minor issues with Bulk action. 1840420 CUSTOM WRITTEN EXTERNAL AUTH MODULE NEED TO BE UPDATED AFTER 3.0.9 UPGRADE SSOXOID.PKB DOESN'T LOAD.
External authentication modules that were written before 3.0.9 need to be updated after upgrading to 3.0.9. ssoauthx.pks is updated in 3.0.9 and contains additional routines that need to be implemented." ??
If I go to the "Login Server Administration" portlet and select the link "Administer External Applications" I get a list of 5 External Applications that have previously been set up.
If I go back to the Home Page and select "customize" on the "External Applications" portlet I get the message "Your Login Server administrator has not registered any external applications".
Does that mean I should just run 'ssoauthx.pks' & 'ssoxoid.pkb' or do I need to do something else ??
Thanks
Simo

Similar Messages

Pattern facet for date (XMLSchema)

Does the Oracle XML Schema Processor 9.0.1.2.0 support the pattern facet for the date type?
I get the error:
XSD-2025: (Error) Invalid text '01-01-2002' in element: 'DSTAMP'
if I validate an instance XML containing
<DSTAMP>01-01-2002</DSTAMP>
against an XMLSchema with:
<xsd:element name="DSTAMP">
<xsd:simpleType>
<xsd:restriction base = "date">
<xsd:pattern value = "MM-DD-CCYY"/>
</xsd:restriction>
</xsd:simpleType>
</xsd:element>
Is there anything wrong here?
TIA

Does the Oracle XML Schema Processor 9.0.1.2.0 support the pattern facet for the date type?
I get the error:
XSD-2025: (Error) Invalid text '01-01-2002' in element: 'DSTAMP'
if I validate an instance XML containing
<DSTAMP>01-01-2002</DSTAMP>
against an XMLSchema with:
<xsd:element name="DSTAMP">
<xsd:simpleType>
<xsd:restriction base = "date">
<xsd:pattern value = "MM-DD-CCYY"/>
</xsd:restriction>
</xsd:simpleType>
</xsd:element>
Is there anything wrong here?
TIA

Hi I would like to know if there will be a new phone released with iOS 8 this fall or is it just the software

Hi I would like to know of there will be a new release with an iphone this fall along with iOS 8

We're users here, not Apple. Why do you think we'd know any more than you do? Not to mention, speculation about unnounced products is strictly forbidden by the Terms of Use of this forum.

The problem about inputDate with pattern specified for 24h time.

Hi all,
i want to use pattern specified for 24h time for inputDate,
format mask like:yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss
at runtime,the inputDate value is :2011/09/27 22:05:59 ,
but the value is 10:05:59 in Calendar Dialog.
then click OK button,the inputDate value becomes :2011/09/27 10:05:59.
This is normal?
thanks in advance.

Hi,
Did you try as follow,
using <af:convertDateTime>
<af:inputDate >
<af:convertDateTime pattern="yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss"/>
</af:inputDate>See
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12839_01/apirefs.1111/e12419/tagdoc/af_convertDateTime.html
http://blogs.oracle.com/Didier/entry/how_to_specify_a_second_date_p

Having probs with radix Sort for strings

I am creating a method that does radix sort for string values. I think I need to know the maximum value for strings to do this, and I have no Idea what that would be

As in the maximum size of a string?
Do you mean characters or actual byte size?

Failing to create new SQL farm with FSconfig.exe for ADFS federation Services on an Azure SQL

I'm building ADFS in Azure. My plan is to use the Azure SQL. The problem is that FSconfig seams not to work with Azure SQL. Here's what i did untill now:
- I followed the documentation and created a new login and user (adfslogin, adfsuser) in a new
"adfsv21" database. Then i added the user to db_owner role.
- From c:\windows\adfs i run FSconfig: FSConfig.exe CreateSQLFarm /ServiceAccount mysa /ServiceAccountPassword ******** /SQLConnectionString "database=Adfsv21;server=[azureServer];User Id=mysa;Password=********" /AutoCertRolloverEnabled. I
tried it with both accounts, mysa and adfsuser with the same poor results.
The result is: "The following error occurred: The specified service account mysa is not valid. Specify
a different service account, and try again."
- I configured odbc and tested the connection. mysa can connect but adfsuser caanot. Why?
To be short, its not working. See this post with similar problems: google to "SQL server farm configuration error"...
So, is Azure SQL & ADFS not complatible? Really not?

My apologies for take a super long time to reply. Are you still having issues here? How can we help?
Thanks Guy

NEW Firmware release Version 2.1 for fs7

http://www.pro.sony.eu/pro/lang/en/eu/support/software/SET_BPE-SS-1238/30 1.) Peaking, Zebra function improvement
     • Peaking and Zebra function will become functional during Picture Cache Recording
2.) Monitor LUT limitations of Ver.2.00 are improved
     • M-LUT remains“off” after S&Q
     • M-LUT is not applicable to SDI-2 while 4K recording.
3.) Operation stability improvement

In time, we all learn to expect nothing from Sony. They are first and foremost a consumer electronics company. They will never build cameras and cater to their customers the way Arri does. We buy Sony's because they are a cheap version that gets the job done. (They look pretty ****** good in my opinoin. Especially with Art Adams LUT.) With that bargain comes a lot of headaches and frustration. It's the hidden price. The moderators and engineers are good people- I am convinced. Unfortunately, they work for a company that ties their hands. I completely understand why they don't keep a presence on these forums. What can they say to people who have purchased a product that continues not to work properly? At the FS7 price point, Sony's main interest is in making a camera that they can obsolete in a couple of years. Sadly it will take those couple of years to get the camera up the specs they promised us. It's just the way they do business. I own a couple of F55s and they are great for the most part. It took over a year for it to become mostly reliable. The OLED viewfinder was a disaster of course, but you win some and you lose some. The Mods are good people but they simply can't do anythng about the way the corporation is run.  In the meantime, buy yourself a Small HD 502 monitor and use that as a viewfinder. That was my solution. As for the shutter changing at will... vigilance is the only answer there I guess. Here is hoping for a fix in version 3 firmware. In the meantime, it's still a great camera for the money. ****** you Sony!

I can't seem to pair my new iPhone 5 with my Volvo for Life (Bluetooth)....

Any suggestions?

Your Volvo system might need a firmware update contact Volvo
There is a lot of information and, unfortunately, misinformation as well in this long thread.
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4313768?tstart=180

New PlayCloud release v0.4.0

Hi,
A new PlayCloud release with :
- Box support
- Fix issue in the system view for some users
- Localization support (only english & french for the moment)
- BlackBerry 10 dev alpha support
is available in the AppWorld.
If you want to see PlayCloud in your language, please to contact me through private message, PlayCloud support from AppWorld...
If you have isses or feature request, please contact me.
Now, I'm going to add still new features...
http://appworld.blackberry.com/webstore/content/109791/?lang=en
Nicolas

Love the app, the UI is very nice; however, I'm a dropbox user and while I can browse all the files in dropbox, I cannot open any of them which makes the app unusable for me. Is there a fix planned for this?
Also, are there any plans to add view options in future (I.e. List View, icon, filmstrip, etc)?
Thanks for your consideration.

How to convert the table with separate fields for every period

Hi there,
I have the table in R/3 called COSP. The table contains the separate fields for values of separate reporting periods, let's say Amount01, Amount02 etc. I need to extract this data to BW and load it into ODS, which contains the data like common key figure for amount and info object Fiscal Period. How to extract and tansform the data to be able to load it there?
I mean, how to change the row like:
100 100 200 200....
for rows like:
001 100
002 100
003 200
004 200
I hope you'll help,
Kooyot

Hi,
you need to implement a bit of coding for that.
With the 'do varying' statement abap provides a loop over those fields. Within this loop you can build up a new internal table with one entry for each period and amount.
kind regards
Siggi
PS: I am not very familiar with CO, but I guess there will be a standard extractor for that.

Connecting a new HP computer with Windows 7 to Airport Express.

I have an AirPort Express set up with my home network, base station is configured on my IMAC. Now I have a new HP PC with Windows 7 for work, and I'm having trouble getting it to connect to the AirPort Express.
It asks for a "Security Key", and nothing in the literature or on the hardware seems to match that. I've tried every number sent with the Airport (ethernet ID, AirPort ID) but nothing works. Can someone provide advice on how to get this to work?
thanks,
Kevin

It is unlikely that the very long security "key" will solve your issue with the PC, but you never know.... it might be worth a try.
Open AirPort Utility, select the AirPort Express and click Manual Setup
Ignoring the window in the center of the screen, look way, way up to the top of the computer screen where the Help, AirPort Utility, Window, etc menus are located.
Click the Base Station menu
Click Equivalent Network Password password and your "key" will appear.

New release strategy should not trgger for PO released with old Rel Strategy

Hi All,
Please suggest. Po has been fully released with Release Strtgy V1 XX. Now I m replacing release strategy XX with ZZ. If I change any po which has old rel str XX , system will reset new release strategy as in config changeability indicator 4 maintained.
But requirement is if there is any change or value decreasing in fully released Pos with old strategy it should not retrigger new release strategy. If value Increases then New strategy should retrigger.
Please help me on this.
regards,
Rohit

HI Rohit
A reset of the release strategy only takes place if
       - the changeability of the release indicator is set to '4' in
          case of a purchase requisition and '4' or '6' in case of
          another purchasing document (purchase order, request for
          quotation, contract, scheduling agreement),
       - the document is still subject to the previous release
          strategy,
       - the new TOTAL NET ORDER VALUE is higher than the old one.
The most important thing to consider in to avoid changes to release strategy customizing once the release strategy is used.
The commom steps are:
1- make sure all of the old POs should have been released.
2- don't delete/change the original release strategy. create a new release strategy with copy function, then the old release strategy will not be replaced.
3- if you delete the original release strategy and add a new release strategy which the characteristics in classification is same as old release strategy then the PO (have been approved) will be replaced with the new release strategy.
Kind regards,
Lorraine

New(?) pattern looking for a good home

Hi everyone, this is my second post to sun forums about this, I initially asked people for help with the decorator and strategy pattern on the general Java Programming forum not being aware that there was a specific section for design pattern related questions. Since then I refined my solution somewhat and was wondering if anyone here would take a look. Sorry about the length of my post, I know it's best to keep it brief but in this case it just seemed that a fully functional example was more important than keeping it short.
So what I'd like to ask is whether any of you have seen this pattern before and if so, then what is it called. I'm also looking for some fresh eyes on this, this example I wrote seems to work but there are a lot of subtleties to the problem so any help figuring out if I went wrong anywhere is greatly appreciated. Please do tell me if you think this is an insane approach to the problem -- in short, might this pattern have a chance at finding a good home or should it be put down?
The intent of the pattern I am giving below is to modify behavior of an object at runtime through composition. In effect, it is like strategy pattern, except that the effect is achieved by wrapping, and wrapping can be done multiple times so the effect is cumulative. Wrapper class is a subclass of the class whose instance is being wrapped, and the change of behavior is accomplished by overriding methods in the wrapper class. After wrapping, the object "mutates" and starts to behave as if it was an instance of the wrapper class.
Here's the example:
public class Test {
     public static void main(String[] args) {
          double[] data = { 1, 1, 1, 1 };
          ModifiableChannel ch1 = new ModifiableChannel();
          ch1.fill(data);
          // ch2 shifts ch1 down by 1
          ModifiableChannel ch2 = new DownShiftedChannel(ch1, 1);
          // ch3A shifts ch2 down by 1
          ModifiableChannel ch3A = new DownShiftedChannel(ch2, 1);
          // ch3B shifts ch2 up by 1, tests independence from ch3A
          ModifiableChannel ch3B = new UpShiftedChannel(ch2, 1);
          // ch4 shifts ch3A up by 1, data now looks same as ch2
          ModifiableChannel ch4 = new UpShiftedChannel(ch3A, 1);
          // print channels:
          System.out.println("ch1:");
          printChannel(ch1);
          System.out.println("ch2:");
          printChannel(ch2);
          System.out.println("ch3A:");
          printChannel(ch3A);
          System.out.println("ch3B:");
          printChannel(ch3B);
          System.out.println("ch4:");
          printChannel(ch4);
     public static void printChannel(Channel channel) {
          for(int i = 0; i < channel.size(); i++) {
               System.out.println(channel.get(i) + "");
          // Note how channel's getAverage() method "sees"
          // the changes that each wrapper imposes on top
          // of the original object.
          System.out.println("avg=" + channel.getAverage());
* A Channel is a simple container for data that can
* find its average. Think audio channel or any other
* kind of sampled data.
public interface Channel {
     public void fill(double[] data);
     public double get(int i);
     public double getAverage();
     public int size();
public class DefaultChannel implements Channel {
     private double[] data;
     public void fill(double[] data) {
          this.data = new double[data.length];
          for(int i = 0; i < data.length; i++)
               this.data[i] = data;
     public double get(int i) {
          if(i < 0 || i >= data.length)
               throw new IndexOutOfBoundsException("Incorrect index.");
          return data[i];
     public double getAverage() {
          if(data.length == 0) return 0;
          double average = this.get(0);
          for(int i = 1; i < data.length; i++) {
               average = average * i / (i + 1) + this.get(i) / (i + 1);
          return average;
     public int size() {
          return data.length;
public class ModifiableChannel extends DefaultChannel {
     protected ChannelModifier modifier;
     public void fill(double[] data) {
          if (modifier != null) {
               modifier.fill(data);
          } else {
               super.fill(data);
     public void _fill(double[] data) {
          super.fill(data);
     public double get(int i) {
          if(modifier != null)
               return modifier.get(i);
          else
               return super.get(i);
     public double _get(int i) {
          return super.get(i);
     public double getAverage() {
          if (modifier != null) {
               return modifier.getAverage();
          } else {
               return super.getAverage();
     public double _getAverage() {
          return super.getAverage();
public class ChannelModifier extends ModifiableChannel {
     protected ModifiableChannel delegate;
     protected ModifiableChannel root;
     protected ChannelModifier tmpModifier;
     protected boolean doSwap = true;
     private void pre() {
          if(doSwap) { // we only want to swap out modifiers once when the
               // top call in the chain is made, after that we want to
               // proceed without it and finally restore doSwap to original
               // state once ChannelModifier is reached.
               tmpModifier = root.modifier;
               root.modifier = this;
               if(delegate instanceof ChannelModifier)
                    ((ChannelModifier)delegate).doSwap = false;
     private void post() {
          if (doSwap) {
               root.modifier = tmpModifier;
          } else {
               if(delegate instanceof ChannelModifier)
                         ((ChannelModifier)delegate).doSwap = true;
     public ChannelModifier(ModifiableChannel delegate) {
          if(delegate instanceof ChannelModifier)
               this.root = ((ChannelModifier)delegate).root;
          else
               this.root = delegate;
          this.delegate = delegate;
     public void fill(double[] data) {
          pre();
          if(delegate instanceof ChannelModifier)
               delegate.fill(data);
          else
               delegate._fill(data);
          post();
     public double get(int i) {
          pre();
          double result;
          if(delegate instanceof ChannelModifier)
               result = delegate.get(i);
          else
               result = delegate._get(i);
          post();
          return result;
     public double getAverage() {
          pre();
          double result;
          if(delegate instanceof ChannelModifier)
               result = delegate.getAverage();
          else
               result = delegate._getAverage();
          post();
          return result;
     public int size() {
          //for simplicity no support for modifying size()
          return delegate.size();
public class DownShiftedChannel extends ChannelModifier {
     private double shift;
     public DownShiftedChannel(ModifiableChannel channel, final double shift) {
          super(channel);
          this.shift = shift;
     @Override
     public double get(int i) {
          return super.get(i) - shift;
public class UpShiftedChannel extends ChannelModifier {
     private double shift;
     public UpShiftedChannel(ModifiableChannel channel, final double shift) {
          super(channel);
          this.shift = shift;
     @Override
     public double get(int i) {
          return super.get(i) + shift;
Output:ch1:
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
avg=1.0
ch2:
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
avg=0.0
ch3A:
-1.0
-1.0
-1.0
-1.0
avg=-1.0
ch3B:
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
avg=1.0
ch4:
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
avg=0.0

jduprez wrote:
Hello,
unless you sell your design better, I deem it is an inferior derivation of the Adapter pattern.
In the Adapter pattern, the adaptee doesn't have to be designed to support adaptation, and the instance doesn't even know at runtime whether it is adapted.
Your design makes the "modifiable" class aware of the modification, and it needs to be explicitly designed to be modifiable (in particular this constrains the implementation hierarchy). Overall DesignPattern are meant to provide flexibility, your version offers less flexibility than Adapter, as it poses more constraint on the modifiable class.
Another sign of this inflexibility is your instanceof checks.
On an unrelated note, I intensely dislike your naming choice of fill() vs _fill()+, I prefer more explicit names (I cannot provide you one as I didn't understand the purpose of this dual method, which a good name would have avoided, by the way).
That being said, I haven't followed your original problem, so I am not aware of the constraints that led you to this design.
Best regards,
J.
Edited by: jduprez on Mar 22, 2010 10:56 PMThank you for your input, I will try to explain my design better. First of all, as I understand it the Adapter pattern is meant to translate one interface into another. This is not at all what I am trying to do here, I am trying to keep the same interface but modify behavior of objects through composition. I started thinking about how to do this when I was trying to apply the Decorator pattern to filter some data. The way I would do that in my example here is to write an AbstractChannelDecorator that delegates all methods to the Channel it wraps:
public abstract class AbstractChannelDecorator implements Channel {
        protected Channel delegate;
...// code ommitted
     public double getAverage() {
          return delegate.getAverage();
...// code ommitted
}and then to filter the data I would extend it with concrete classes and override the appropriate methods like so:
public class DownShiftedChannel extends AbstractChannelDecorator {
     ...// code ommitted
     public double get(int i) {
          return super.get(i) - shift;
       ...// code ommitted
}(I am just shifting the data here to simplify the examples but a more realistic example would be something like a moving average filter to smooth the data).
Unfortunately this doesn't get me what I want, because getAverage() method doesn't use the filtered data unless I override it in the concrete decorator, but that means I will have to re-implement the whole algorithm. So that's pretty much my motivation for this, how do I use what on the surface looks like a Decorator pattern, but in reality works more like inheritance?
Now as to the other points of critique you mentioned:
I understand your dislike for such method names, I'm sorry about that, I had to come up with some way for the ChannelModifier to call ModifiableChannel's super's method equivalents. I needed some way to have the innermost wrapped object to initiate a call to the topmost ChannelModifier, but only do it once -- that was one way to do it. I suppose I could have done it with a flag and another if/else statement in each of the methods, or if you prefer, the naming convention could have been fill() and super_fill(), get() and super_get(), I didn't really think that it was that important. Anyway, those methods are not meant to be used by any other class except ChannelModifier so I probably should have made them protected.
The instanceof checks are necessary because at some point ChannelModifier instance runs into a delegate that isn't a ChannelModifier and I have to somehow detect that, because otherwise instead of calling get() I'd call get() which in ModifiableChannel would take me back up to the topmost wrapper and start the whole call chain again, so we'd be in infinite recursion. But calling get() allows me to prevent that and go straight to the original method of the innermost wrapped object.
I completely agree with you that the example I presented has limited flexibility in supporting multiple implementations. If I had two different Channel implementations I would need two ModifiableChannel classes, two ChannelModifiers, and two sets of concrete implementations -- obviously that's not good. Not to worry though, I found a way around that. Here's what I came up with, it's a modification of my original example with DefaultChannel replaced by ChannelImplementation1,2:
public class ChannelImplementation1 implements Channel { ... }
public class ChannelImplementation2 implements Channel { ... }
// this interface allows implementations to be interchangeable in ChannelModifier
public interface ModifiableChannel {
     public double super_get(int i);
     public double super_getAverage();
     public void setModifier(ChannelModifier modifier);
     public ChannelModifier getModifier();
public class ModifiableChannelImplementation1
          extends ChannelImplementation1
          implements ModifiableChannel {
     ... // see DefaultChannel in my original example
public class ModifiableChannelImplementation2
          extends ChannelImplementation1
          implements ModifiableChannel { ...}
// ChannelModifier is a Channel, but more importantly, it takes a Channel,
// not any specific implementation of it, so in effect the user has complete
// flexibility as to what implementation to use.
public class ChannelModifier implements Channel {
     protected Channel delegate;
     protected Channel root;
     protected ChannelModifier tmpModifier;
     protected boolean doSwap = true;
     public ChannelModifier(Channel delegate) {
          if(delegate instanceof ChannelModifier)
               this.root = ((ChannelModifier)delegate).root;
          else
               this.root = delegate;
          this.delegate = delegate;
     private void pre() {
          if(doSwap) {
               if(root instanceof ModifiableChannel) {
                    ModifiableChannel root = (ModifiableChannel)this.root;
                    tmpModifier = root.getModifier();
                    root.setModifier(this);
               if(delegate instanceof ChannelModifier)
                    ((ChannelModifier)delegate).doSwap = false;
     private void post() {
          if (doSwap) {
               if(root instanceof ModifiableChannel) {
                    ModifiableChannel root = (ModifiableChannel)this.root;
                    root.setModifier(tmpModifier);
          } else {
               if(delegate instanceof ChannelModifier)
                         ((ChannelModifier)delegate).doSwap = true;
     public void fill(double[] data) {
          delegate.fill(data);
     public double get(int i) {
          pre();
          double result;
          if(delegate instanceof ModifiableChannel)
// I've changed the naming convention from _get() to super_get(), I think that may help show the intent of the call
               result = ((ModifiableChannel)delegate).super_get(i);
          else
               result = delegate.get(i);
          post();
          return result;
     public double getAverage() {
          pre();
          double result;
          if(delegate instanceof ModifiableChannel)
               result = ((ModifiableChannel)delegate).super_getAverage();
          else
               result = delegate.getAverage();
          post();
          return result;
     public int size() {
          return delegate.size();
public class UpShiftedChannel extends ChannelModifier { ...}
public class DownShiftedChannel extends ChannelModifier { ... }

ORA-19007 when coping a table with an xml type in it to a new schema in the

ORA-19007 when coping a table with an xml type in it to a new schema in the same database.
Hi all,
When I copy a table with an xml type in it to a new schema in the same database I get an ora-19009.
The setup is as follows I have a schema a with table TABLE_WITH_XMLTYPE where data is:
CREATE
TABLE TABLE_WITH_XMLTYPE
FOLDER_ID NUMBER (10, 0) NOT NULL,
SEARCH_PROPERTIES XMLTYPE ,
CONSTRAINT TABLE_WITH_XMLTYPE PK PRIMARY KEY (FOLDERID) USING INDEX
XMLTYPE COLUMN SEARCH_PROPERTIES XMLSCHEMA
"http://xxxxxxx.net/FolderProperties.xsd" element "FolderProperties"
VARRAY SEARCH_PROPERTIES."XMLDATA"."PROPERTIES"."PROPERTY" STORE AS TABLE
PROPERTY_TABLE
(PRIMARY KEY (NESTED_TABLE_ID, ARRAY_INDEX)) ORGANIZATION INDEX OVERFLOW
Both schemas have the following xml schema registered as a local xml schema
BEGIN
DBMS_XMLSCHEMA.registerSchema(
SCHEMAURL => 'http://xxxxxxx.net/FolderProperties.xsd',
SCHEMADOC =>
'<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:xdb="http://xmlns.oracle.com/xdb"
xdb:storeVarrayAsTable="true">
<xs:element name="FolderProperties"
type="FolderPropertiesType"
xdb:defaultTable="FOLDER_SEARCH_PROPERTIES" />
<xs:complexType name="FolderPropertiesType" xdb:SQLType="FOLDERPROPERTIES_T">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="FolderID" type="FolderIDType" minOccurs="1" xdb:SQLName="FOLDER_ID"/>
<xs:element name="Properties" type="PropertiesType" xdb:SQLName="PROPERTIES"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="PropertiesType" xdb:SQLType="PROPERTIES_T">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="Property" type="PropertyType" maxOccurs="unbounded"
xdb:SQLName="PROPERTY" xdb:SQLCollType="PROPERTY_V"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="PropertyType" xdb:SQLType="PROPERTY_T">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="DateValue" type="DateType" xdb:SQLName="DATE_VALUE"/>
<xs:element name="NumValue" type="NumType" xdb:SQLName="NUM_VALUE"/>
<xs:element name="StringValue" type="StringType" xdb:SQLName="STRING_VALUE"/>
</xs:sequence>
<xs:attribute name="Name" xdb:SQLName="NAME" xdb:SQLType="VARCHAR2">
<xs:simpleType>
<xs:restriction base="xs:string">
<xs:minLength value="1"/>
<xs:maxLength value="255"/>
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:attribute>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:simpleType name="FolderIDType">
<xs:restriction base="xs:integer"/>
</xs:simpleType>
<xs:simpleType name="DateType">
<xs:restriction base="xs:dateTime"/>
</xs:simpleType>
<xs:simpleType name="NumType">
<xs:restriction base="xs:decimal"/>
</xs:simpleType>
<xs:simpleType name="StringType">
<xs:restriction base="xs:string" />
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:schema>',
LOCAL => TRUE,
GENTYPES => TRUE,
GENTABLES => FALSE);
END;
when I try to do the following insert:
insert into schemaB.TABLE_WITH_XMLTYPE ( FOLDER_ID, SEARCH_PROPERTIES)
select FOLDER_ID, SEARCH_PROPERTIES from schemaB.TABLE_WITH_XMLTYPE;
I’ll get an ora-19007.
Can some one point me in the right direction how to solve this error.
Thanks Roelof.

Who did you create the second table, in other words, how did you COPY the table as you said...
If you created the second table via a CTAS (create table as select) then you will have created a table that is not the same as the original one. AFAIK I have once created an enhancement request for this after discovering that JDeveloper, for example, creates a "copy" via a CTAS which creates the wrong structure. Double check via package DBMS_METADATA.
SQL> set long 1000000
SQL> select DBMS_METADATA('TABLE','TABLE_WITH_XMLTYPE','SchemaA') from dual;
SQL> select DBMS_METADATA('TABLE','TABLE_WITH_XMLTYPE','SchemaB') from dual;If you have got two different tables, than Mark's solution should help.
M.
Edited by: Marco Gralike on Feb 15, 2009 11:16 AM

ANN: New XDK release for 9.0.2B and 9.0.1.1.0A available

New XDK Releases for 9.0.2B Beta Version and 9.0.1.1.0A Procudtion Version are online at:
http://technet.oracle.com/tech/xml/xdkhome.html
What's new:
- Oracle9i XDK for C and C++ released on Linux
- Oracle TransX Utility Aids loading data and text.These release is part of the XDK for Java 9.0.2 Beta.
- Oracle SOAP APIs added to the XDK for Java
Support for the SOAP services have been added to the XDK for Java 9.0.1.1.0A Production.
- XML Schema Processor for Java supports both LAX Mode and STRICT Mode Validation
The XML Schema Processor for Java now supports both LAX Mode and STRICT
Mode Validation. Compared with STRICT Mode where every element from the root on down is required to be defined and validated, LAX Mode Schema validation provides developers the ability to limit the XML Schema
validation to the subsections of the XML document.
This will simplify XML Schema definitions and the validation process by skipping the ignorable content. Furthermore, with LAX mode, developers can divide their XML documents into small fragments and carry out the XML Schema validation in a parallel or progressive way. This results, in a much more flexible and productive schema validation process.
- SAX2 Extension support in the Java XML Parser
The XML Parser for Java now supports two new handlers - LexicalHandler and DeclHandler.
XML documents now can be parsed through Oracle XML Parser SAX APIs with full access
to the DTD declarations and the lexical items like comments and CDATA sections.
This ensures that the complete content model is preserved.
- JAXP 1.1 supports is now added to the XDK for Java
- New Differ Bean in the XDK for JavaBeans
A new bean has been added the the JavaBean XDK which analyses the differences between to XML documents and outputs the XSL sytlesheet that will convert one into the
other. This is extremely useful when converting an XML document retrieved from a SQL query into an xHTML page on the web.
Stylesheets can now be automaticly created for use in XSQL pages.
- XML Compression now supported in the Java XML Parser
Now developers can take advantage of a compressed XML stream when serializing their DOM and SAX outputs. This new functionality significantly reduces the size without losing any information. Both DOM and SAX compressed streams are fully compatible and the SAX stream can be used to generate a
corresponding DOM tree. These compressed streams can also be stored in Oracle as a CLOB for efficient storage and retrieval.

bump up for east cost.

New schema release, with pattern facet for strings?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for