New Third Party remittance issue

I am trying to run the new third party posting program. I keep getting the following message and no warning message.
Remittance evaluation run log
Statistics .
Remittance evaluation run 9999999999
Status Evaluation run failed! No documents created
Personnel numbers selected 0
Personnel numbers evaluated 0
Personnel numbers rejected 0
Personnel numbers skipped 0
Number of errors 0
No of warnings 0
HRPAYNA104 Warning:No item found for this selection.
This is the first time we are running this in our implementation. I have made sure all P3PR switches are flipped. Please help.

Hi Felipe
I have the similar situation and I have applied the Note 1538315 and Now I am going to apply the Note 1484798 ( But this note is for Canada ) the similar issue I have is for US payroll .. which Note should I apply for US
Please advice
Thanks
Henry

Similar Messages

Third party remittance issue - no documents created

hi All,
When I am excuting Third party remittance for an employee I am getting status as: Evaluated! no documents created. When I checked in PCP0, the document is created. After checking the status in PCP0 I am executing 3rd party payroll and below log is displayed:
Remittance evaluation run 9999999999
Status Evaluated ! No documents created
Personnel number selected: 1
Personnel number evaluated 1
personnel number rejected 0
personnel number skipped 0
Number of errors 0
No of warnings 0
Can an one please help me on this issue.
Thanks,
Sai

hi Michael,
The employee payroll has been successful. Post payroll execution we have done FI Posting and document has been created for the posting which we have checked through PCP0.
Can you please help on this issue.
Thanks,
Sai

Third Party Remittance Process

Hi All,
Wage type '/484' is a technical wage type used for one of the taxes in the US. Our client just started using this tax type for a new tax for the state of New York. SAP has the tax wage types set to post in third-party remittance by default, even though we do not use third-party remittance for taxes (we only use third-party remittance for garnishments).
To avoid using Third Party Remittance I have changed the processing class 78 value for '/484' from u201C2u201D to BLANK. So that this will stop it from being included in the third-party remittance process.
Actually, I have not worked much on this Remittance process. I have made changes in Development system but have not transported them to quality.
But, I want to know how would i test it. I need to test in two scenario's:
1. Testing in quality so that i can see remittance happening (When Processing Class '78' value is '2').
2. Testing again in quality how remittance is getting stopped for Wage Type '/484' (When Processing Class '78' value is '0').
So, basically I want to know how we can check (verify) for remittance happening in the system for a particular Wage Type.
Regards,
Avinash

transaction: PC00_M10_U500
This transaction runs the payroll driver (the same one that we run payroll with, program RPCALCU0). It defaults to the schema u201CU500u201D. Use this standard schema if no custom specific modifications are done.
The testing for this is to run the third-party remittance process and verify that the error no longer occurs for an employee with wage type /484.

Third party remittance Error

Hi
While running the third party remittance program PC00_M99_URME - Evaluate remittance (New)
I am getting the error "No entry in table T51RK for key 00000" There is no remittance rule 00000 which I have defined. Nor this entry is present in the table. but I am getting the message
THere is one more messga e which I am getting "No entry in table 3 for key 90000001 20.06.2008"
This 90000001 entry is in the HR payee table but this entry is not linked to any of my vendor or wage types. when I delete this entry I still get this message.
Any clue ?? Is there a note ?

It sounds like you have the wage type tied to third-party remittance via table T512W, processing classes 73 and 78. Do you want this wage type to remit and it is generating an error or are you getting the error and do not intend to remit?

Third Party Remittance config for Canada

I have a requirement as follows:
Third Party Remittance programs are to be available for use by Canada.
When executing program PC00_M07_K500 we get the below error message
Entry notfound for wage type: /102
Business number : XXXXXXXXX and prov. of employment:
Please check table T5KRC.
Can someone help me out with the steps to configure TPR for CAnada? I've searched everywhere but cannot find a config guide?

I got the answer. I tested with changing the processing class it's working fine without any issues.

Third Party Remittance Posting RUN : Information regarding particular BA Mi

Hi Guys,
While posting to FI for Third Party Remittance Posting RUN (standard sap Program RPURMPK0), when the selection for Business Area is left blank, the o/p gets Posted Properly for Business Area = ___(i.e. blank) and for all the other Business Area that is valid for the pay run. But the Information that is displayed in the output is only for Business Area = ___(i.e. blank).
If the other applicable Business Area ( = 01 suppose) is there in this pay, it gets posted properly, but the information is not displayed.
Can u guys let me know how to get read of the diplay problem???
Thanks in advance
Jay Gandhi

Hi Guys,
This is the problem in the coding of SAP Program itself. I have copied it to Z Program and have made the changes, it works properly now.
Have also notified SAP OSS .
Jay Gandhi

How to configure a new third party sales document type?

Hi SAP SD gurus,
I am new to the SAP world, I need your help in configuring a new third party sales document type for a site.
There are existing third party document types being used in the region, but the client wants an entirely new third party document type that is activated for CREDIT MANAGEMENT.
I just need your inputs, as how to go about it. If I copy from an existing third party sales doc. What additional steps do I need to follow? Like Item category config, copy control settings, and credit management.
Is there a need to create new billing types?
Also as per process, by creating a new document type, how will it affect the logistic processes, if any?
Thanks a lot in advance for your valuable inputs.

Hello,
You can create new document type under following customization path
SPRO>>Sales and Distribution>>Sales>>Sales Documents>>Define Sales Document Types
Now create new document type by copying the standard document type OR
Now go to
SPRO>>Sales and Distribution>>Sales>>Sales Documents>>Sales Document Item>>Define Item Categories
which is already defined for third party sales (TAS)
Now assign this iteme category to your new document type
SPRO>>Sales and Distribution>>Sales>>Sales Documents>>Sales Document Item>>Assign Item Categories
Assignment needs to be done in combination of sales document type and item category group (BANS)
Now
SPRO>>Sales and Distribution>>Sales>>Sales Documents>>Schedule Lines
Assignment of schedule line is already done as you are using the standard one.
Lastly, you may need to maintain copy control for your newly created sales document type for this go to
SPRO>>Sales and Distribution>>Sales>>Maintain Copy Control for Sales Documents
(Copying Control: Sales Document to Sales Document)
Here you can define copy control requirements.
BR,
Tushar

Third party remittance simulation document

Hi Guys,
When i open third party remittance simulation posting document in PCP0 and when double click on vendor to see the details of payments it shows me following error.
"An explanation of some or all document lines is not possible".
Here is the detail explanation:
iagnosis
   The system cannot explain one or all document lines of this selection.
rocedure
   This problem can be caused by either:
   o   A document line item being incomplete. For more information, see the
       error explanation.
   o   The posting run having been created before the remittance
       functionality supported "detailed info on TP runs". In this case,
       the system will not be able to show the selection correctly. As a
       result, the displayed items may not add up to the total sum of the
       selected items.
We have selected the data on employee level on the config level.
On PRD posting, we can see the detailed item.
What could be the reason?
Mayuresh

Hi Mayuresh,
I am also receiving this error message. Were you able to view the simulation document?
Is it missing any authorization objects?
Thank you.
Lynn

Third Party Remittance Document Numbers

Hi All,
Client would like separate document numbers per vendor in the third party remittance posting. Currently one document number has several vendors. Does anyone know how to accomplish this?
Thanks,
Marlo

Hi Mayuresh,
I am also receiving this error message. Were you able to view the simulation document?
Is it missing any authorization objects?
Thank you.
Lynn

Correct third party remittance with a status of 50

How can I correct a third party remittance run with a status of 50? It looks like the run was created from an off-cycle payroll but it won't post because it has a status of '50'.
thanks,

After off-cycle you have to post the document, once posted the status becomes '50', then you can do your third party evaluations.
- Aby
Edited by: aby on Mar 30, 2010 10:57 PM

Customization of HR Payee for third party remittance

Dear all,
Could anyone please explain me about this concept : "Customization of HR Payee for third party remittance"?
What this actually means and what we do in it?
Thank you all in advance.
Regards,
Mamta

hi mamta,
this mainly decides how you pay the third parties through payroll.
here you have to create HR payees for the third party vendors.
then you setup the assignment of the WT to the HR payees.
then you take the information of the G/L accounts and also others details like which G/L account is for which third party vendor from the FI people. then depending on that information you then setup the assignment of the HR payees to their respective G/L accounts.
here you also have to decide when these payments has to be made to these third party providers.
you enter the HR payees numbers in table T51RH.
this is just an overview of configuration of Third party Remittance.
reward points if it is helpful
regards,
salman

Facing a problem to run the garnishment for third party remittances

Hi All,
When we try create a posting run using Progrm RPURMP00 for garnishment for third party remittances. We got an error messages as PERNO. ...... no link to payroll results.
Thanks,
-suresh

Did you carry out the following two activities?
1. The payroll run, the evaluation run and the store evaluation run must have been completed before you can remit anything.
2. Tables T51RL, T51RC, T51RH and T51RD must be maintained.

TP Posting Third Party Remittance Documents Status Incorrect

Hi everyone,
I have run payroll to an employee and posted the results to FI Posting. Documents are posted in FI Posting. By using Tcode PC00_M99_URME - Evaluation Remittance (New) I am able to do the third party evaluation for this employee. Until this step the system is working fine. But when I am trying to execute using the T code PC00_M99_URMP - Create Posting run the system is generating incorrect documents.
The message its showing is
Messages for Document 0000002282Error in document: HRPAY 0000002282 LOG_800 ( Error Message )
No data was transferred in parameter ACCOUNTPAYABLE (Error Message)
Regarding configuration everything is correct in HR, I verified several times.
Kindly let me know is there some thing to do reg vendors in FI such that vendors information will be updated in FI.
Does anyone faced the similar issue earlier.
If anyone has an idea in resolving the above issue please guide me.
Your advices are very much appreciated.
Thanks,
lalitha.

Thanks for your quick response.
I verified the configuration, but I haven't noticed any issue.
The problem I noticed is when we run third party evaluation run the amount of sign should be changed fron negative to positive. but its not changing.
The processing class 73 has specification 1.
Kindly let me know if you have any idea why amount sign is not reserved.
Regards,
Lalitha.

Third party PO issue

Hello Friends,
I have scenario as below:
I am purchasing packing material X (with value say Rs 5)from a vendorA & deliver it directly to vendor B ,from whom I am purchasing material Y (say value Rs 100) & which is packed in material X.
The client wants to receive the material back material Y packed in X , and pay him only Rs 100 , but the value updation of this should get as Rs 105.
If required I can make a new material master for the packed material received from the client.
Kindly guide me in mapping this scenario.
Thanks in Advance

Yes, it is again third party processing but with a difference, no item category, no account assignment category and no sales order is required. In subcontracting process normally components are delivered from the companyu2019s warehouse. But sometimes to meet some business specific requirement, a purchase order is placed to vendor with instruction that the components to be delivered at an address of subcontracting vendor instead of the companyu2019s warehouse address. On receipt of the purchase order, the vendor will deliver the goods/components directly to subcontractor address.
Purchase Order for Components
Under this process a standard purchase order with a different delivery address is created. In the delivery address dialog box the vendor number is entered and the SC vendor box is checked. Checking the box is the deciding factor for the components that these are posted to subcontractor stock at the time of goods receipt.
Goods Receipt of the Components
On receipt of the confirmation from the subcontractor that the components have arrived at his address, goods receipt can be entered for the purchase order. On entering the goods receipt, the components are posted directly to the stock of the material provided to vendor at plant level. Quantity and value are also updated at plant level.
Goods Receipt for End Products
On receipt of end product from subcontractor, a goods receipt for the subcontract order is entered in the same way as for a standard purchase order. But this good receipt will be again different from the good receipt for a standard purchase order as it covers following two types of goods movements.
Goods receipt items for the materials supplied by the vendor Goods issue items for the components
Valuation The goods receipt is valuated at the subcontract price (services charges) plus the value of the components consumed.

3.1.3 Third party apps issue

I recently upgraded to 3.1.3 on my iphone from my macbook pro. Once everything was loaded up and synced, my third party apps will no longer start. Has anyone that is experiencing this same issue from the update have a solution to fix this?

You can back up most everything:
1. Music: should be under the iTunes folder or wherever on your hard drive
2. Pictures: just open the iPhone as a physical hard drive and copy to the hard drive
3. Apps: Are all located in folder within iTunes under Music. Just copy and backup somewhere else on the Hard Drive
4. Ringtones; Are all located in a folder within iTunes as well and can be manually backed up from there
The only thing you really loose are the customizations within the OS and applications them self.
I just repartioned/reformatted a Vista notebook and upgraded to Win7 with a complete fresh install, which means everything was wiped out. But I made all the backups and was fine once I was ready for iTunes and my iPhone 3GS which was still on 3.0.1. I updated to 3.1.3, restored as new (without using a backup), used iPhone Config. Utility profiles to setup email accounts, APN's and WiFi spots, synced the music, ringtones, wallpapers and pictures all within 1 hour. The only thing that took time was to figure out what to back up and where to find it.
Message was edited by: sb0611
Message was edited by: sb0611

New Third Party remittance issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for