New vprs condition for posting COPA according to item category

Hi
     My client has a requirement of  posting in COPA according to item category, for example ,i have two items in the billing one is with normal item ctegory (TAN) and other is (TANN),They want the postings should be different for both the item categories in COPA so that they can show  the free items  VPRS  cost should be booked in other expenses(TANN).
I tried by adding  another condition type  like ZPRS and made a routine but system is working  in the order and at the time of billing system is not working
Provide the suitable solution
Regards

Hi!! Sriram Kiran,
I would rather suggest a different method.
Please make the following changes.
1) In the detail screen of your item category TANN, in the section of 'Business Data' for the field Pricing the value entered should be 'B'.
2) Next insert condition type R100 in your pricing procedure and insert the requirement for the condition type R100 as 55.
this way pricing is applied to the product with category TANN but is with 100% discount and the cost VPRS is transferred for COPA.
According to me no need to create a new condition type for cost of the free item.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
PATHIK
Hi!
Pl note it as 09371095087
Message was edited by:
        Pathik Pandya

Similar Messages

  • I need help getting new authorization codes for digital copies

    I need help getting new authorization codes for digital copies of movies. Can someone help me out?

    There's a lot of results in Google when you search for this but unfortunately refreshing the page doesn't seem to generate a different code anymore. Mine also says already redeemed

  • How to create new starting conditions for a workflow of shopping cart

    Hi all,
    How to create new starting conditions for a workflow of shopping cart
    SATYA

    Excecute SWB_COND
    Creating New:
    Click on Create button. If you cannot see that it could be a authorization issue
    then Business Object:  BUS2121
    Double Click the event linkage for one step workflow
    Define the expressions, Check Consistency and click on Traansfer
    Start Condition is created. If it is not Active click on the Red Button to make it Active
    Editing Already existing:
    Click on Edit Button If you cannot see that it could be a authorization issue
    then select Business Object:  BUS2121
    Click on the condition part (White area) of the start condtion needing editing
    Change the expressions, Check Consistency) and click on Traansfer.If it is not Active click on the Red Button to make it Active

  • Lock Condition for posting

    Hello
    We have a requirement to lock certain conditions in a contract for posting.
    The workaround is to take note of such conditions in a contract and exclude the same while running the RERAPP but this is not feasible in our current scenario as billing team is different from accounting team.
    Number of contracts are also huge (about 40000+). Billing team liaise with tenant and if there are any issues, would like to block the condition for posting. Accounting team will run RERAPP without this knowledge and if the lock option is activated, then this condition will not get posted.
    Similarly we have an additional requirement that retroactive adjustments (follow on cash flow) should be posted separately in RERAPP. Now in this case, flow type is the only differentiating factor because due date of retro adjustment may be same as of regular cash flow item.
    Please advise
    Rakesh

    Dear Rakesh Sharma.
    If you just only want to prevent/restrict certain conditions of contract posting activity
    (RERAPP),you simply consider about this method as below ;
      1) You can define the RE Authorization Object for the restrict activity of certain
          condition in the Accounting team role.
          -   Authorization Object : F_RECD_CN
          -   Activity : 02 (Change)
          -   Condition Type : Except for the certain conditions.
          but this method can not be suitable, when account team try to run RERAPP
          with check the "Do Not Update Conditions" option.
        So, you can consider the easiest way by applying the "Enhancements"
       2) Apply the Enhancements for Periodic Posting.
            - Enhancement Spot : BADI_RE_RA_CA
            - BADI : BADI_RERA_POSTING_PARAM
              (Periodic Posting: Restrict Selection of Cash Flow Records)
            - Method : SUPPRESS_CF_ITEM
            - Example : you can defined your own customer-specific parameters such as
                       "Check the Certain Condition & User role/department for suppressing"
    but how about this..,when you design the lease account management process,
    it seem better to rebuild the contract creation and contract posting process bwtween
    contract management team and account team ahead of the technical processing.
    Regards,
    Jeong, Yeong-Chul

  • Error while posting:There is no item category assigned to account 2001/KCOA

    Iam trying to post a purchase invoice posting to F-43 But getting error as:
    There is no item category assigned to account 2001/KCOA
    Diagnosis
        The online document splitting is active in your system. Here, each
        document is assigned to a accounting transaction variant and each
        document row to an item category.
        You determine for each business transaction variant which item
        categories can or must be posted here.
        The following error occurred for the document you entered:
        No item category could be determined for account 2001 in chart of
        accounts KCOA.
    Could You Please let me know How to Assign Item catagory for that particular account (2001-Inv raw material A/C)????\
    Thx,
    Umesh

    Hi,
    Go to the path:
    SPRO> Financial Accounting (New) > Geenral Ledger Accounting (New) > Business Transactions > Document Splitting > Classify G/L Accounts for Document Splitting > Execute
    When you get a pop-up, enter the relevant Chart of Accounts
    Click on New Entries and enter the G/L Account 2001 (i assume its a recon account for vendor).
    Select the Item category 03000 Vendor and save.
    Hope that helps.
    Regs.

  • Suppresing Delivery note prints for certain sales order types/item category

    Hi
    I need to find a way of suppressing some delivery notes from being printed.
    Relating to orders for consignment fill up and consignment issue.
    The delivery notes are needed to be printed for 'Consignment fill up order' type, BUT not for Consignment issue - as this is confusing some of the warehouse staff at month end.
    All have the same delivery type, the only difference i can see is the item category types are different
    Is there a way i can use the sales order type, with customer number as an access sequence for the Output type ?
    -  Or the Item category type ?
    Is it possible to add sales order type or Item category into the FIELD CATALOG :- output for deliveries
    Your help would be much appreciated
    Cheers
    Tony

    Hi,
    I can suggest you something, but do remember that I've never done such kind of thing till date.
    >> Copy LF and create new delivery type
    >> Assign this to your consignment doc. types
    >> Kindly remove the Header output determination procedure assigned to this new delivery type
    >> Then assign output det. procedure at Item level {according to Item category}
    >> Then check if will cater to your requirment or not.
    Please keep one thing in mind that I am giving you a proposal by thinking in one logical way and I can't confirm the practicality of the proposal.
    Hrishi

  • ECS: New Pricing condition for purchase order on item level

    Hello Experts,
    we use SRM 5.0 with the extend classic scenario.
    We customized a new pricing condition (absolute discount), which we want to use in a purchase order and added it to the calculation schema.
    condition type:
    Application     BBP                      
    Source system LOCAL
    Usage           PR
    Condition Type  ZRBT
    Access Seq.     01CT
    Condition class       discount                  
    Calculat. Type    fixed amount
    Condit.category
    Rounding rule  commercial
    manual has priority
    item level
    delete
    amount/percent
    UoM
    Scale Base Type   quantity
    Check stat             none       
    Max. No. Dimens    no scales
    We see the condition type and can choose it in the transaction which is used to create a po.
    But when we choose it from the drop-down box it isn't added to the calculation.
    Regards,
    Sven

    Hello Sven,
    Thank you very much for posting the OSS note solution for your issue.
    I had similar issue and finally was able to resolve it after reading your post.
    regards
    Vinod

  • New output needed for posted invoice

    Hi all,
    The company I am working for posted an invoice via MIRO but there was no output determination configured. This invoice was posted for last year however they now need to print an output for their records.
    Is it possible to do this?
    Thanks for the help.
    Ryan

    Hi Ryan
    Welcome to SDN Forum
    Post the thread in SAP MM Forum.You will get correct solution as the issue is related to MIRO  So Close the thread here and post a new thread in MM Forum.
    Regards
    Srinath

  • Multiple PR doc type for Maintenance order - Non stock item category

    For non-stock item requirement in PM, we create a maintenance order and indicate item category as "N" in components tab. Accordingly a purchase requisition is created as per configuration. We have assigned PR doc. Type “FO – Framework requisition” for Maintenance Order Category.
    SPRO - PLANT MAINTENANCE & CS - Maintenance and Service Processing - Maintenance and Service Orders - General Data - Define Account Assignment Cat. and Document Type for Purchase Requisitions
    Now according to the new requirement, we need to have different PR Doc type as per CONTROL KEY mentioned in the Maintenance Order.
    Example:
    If the Control Key is “PM01 - Plant maintenance – internal” the purchase requisition document type should be “NB – Purchase Requisition”. If the Control Key is “PM03 - Plant maintenance-External(services)” the purchase requisition document type should be “FO – Framework Requisition”.
    Please advise how to configure the same.
    Regards
    Sathish Kumar Balakrishnan

    Hi Partha,
    This is a simple enhancement. In our scenario, we had configured PR document type "FO" in SPRO settings for "Document Type for Purchase Requisitions".
    Hence to have "NB" PR document type whenever material components are being indented through maintenance order, we used this enhancement COZF0002
    Please instruct your abaper to add similar logic, as shown below.
    Enhancement:COZF0002
    Functional module:EXIT_SAPLCOZF_002
    Include: ZXCOZU02
    Logic:
    IF sy-tcode eq 'IW21' or sy-tcode eq 'IW22' OR sy-tcode eq 'IW28'  OR sy-tcode eq 'IW31' or sy-tcode eq 'IW32'  OR sy-tcode eq 'IW38' .
      IF resbd_imp-postp = 'N'.
        eban_ord_cust_chg-bsart = 'NB'.
      ENDIF.
    endif.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards
    Sathish K B

  • For Z Po order type - Item category field is  greyed out.

    Hi MM Experts,
    I am an ABAper working on PO creation with respect to PR( PR with account assignment N)  for Z order type . The requirement includes to update item category of PO with B , But for this Z order type both PO transaction Create/Change(ME21/ME22) the field item category has been greyed out ( Non editable). I checked the SPRO setting for this order type ( SPRO-MM->Purchasing-PO->Define Screenlayout at document level .The field item category has been made as optional.
    Please let me know why this field ( item category still showing in display mode) and How to make it as editable .I need it as editable in ME22 to implement the new requirement of updating that field with item ategory B.
    Thanks in Advance
    Pravee.

    Hi All,
    Since I was creating a PO with respect to PR - after running through all the screens the item category field was becoming non editable, But during the create in one of screen the field item category was still editable, so I updated the item category with B during the create and created the PO, I have used BDC to do the same and its working fine. Thanks for all your inputs.
    Thanks
    Pravee.

  • Split Charging for PO-Framework Order with Item category B- Blank Item

    Hi,
    how can i make the system split the qty percentage/charging  for Framework Order ,Charge to Project and Item Category of B- Blank item during PO creation/change. This functionality is behaving normal for  a standard PO charge to P and item category is standard.
    we are using ecc6 and we dont use any material master..
    Thanks in advance..
    She

    Hi,
    This can be controlled through account assignment category,
    In SPRO > Materials Management > Purchasing > Account Assignment > Maintain Account Assignment Categories > Double click on account asignment category > Fill the field distribution according to your requirement.
    During PO creation, in item details, account assignment tab, you can give the split.
    Regards,
    Prabu

  • Creation of New consistencycheck condition for Normal Correction

    Hi,
    We are using ChaRM normal correction to check the transport imported to production system we are using the check conditon 'PRODUCTION_IMPORT_OK' which is implemented in Class CL_SOCM_INSTANCE .
    On similar base we wanted to create the condition of 'ZTEST_IMPORT_OK' for normal correction, but we are not able to find the Standard code written for condition PRODUCTION_IMPORT_OK.
    If find this code we can make some adjustment in this code with BADI for consistency check to implement the new condition .
    Is any one worked on this type of condition , your help will be appreciated.
    Regards,
    Amar Kamat

    HI
    Check if needed to assign any account key to this new condition type in your procedure if needed, then mantain the GL acc for the same.
    If you are adding this condition type in your TAXINN procedure (assuming so) you need to create the condition type for the same by using trax FV11.
    If you are adding your condition type in Pricing procedure then no ned to create the condition record.
    Regards
    Sujoy

  • New business requirement for ECM changes to BOM item detail

    Hello SAP ECM gurus,
    I need your guidance on below requirement from the customer in ECM.
    We have 'Date effectivity' in our system i.e. object changes become effective on 'valid from' date.
    We also have a custom enhancement where BOM header status is controlled by the 'post approval' process via workflow.
    i.e. BOM status is changed to 11 when 'Complete Change' status is set on OMR and changed back to '01' automatically when 'Release Change' is set on OMR.
    We have a new requirement from business as described below:
    For ex:
    2 components (COMP1 & COMP2) are added to BOM through ECR1 effective from 01-AUG-2011 till Infinity
    2 more components (COMP3 & COMP4) will be added to the same alternate through ECR2 effective from 01-SEP-2011 till Infinity.
    ECR1 changes are made and OMR status set to 'Complete Changes' changes i.e. BOM status is 11 effective from 01AUG2011 till Infinity.
    At this point of time, ECR2 is created. When changes are being made to the same BOM using ECR2, COMP1 & COMP2 (added through ECR1) appear in the BOM.
    This is not desirable for the customer. They do not want to see COMP1 & COMP2 to appear when changes are being made to ECR2 as ECR1 is still not post approved. They expect COMP1 & COMP2 to appear in the BOM only when ECR1 is post approved.
    How can we control effectivity of COMP1 & COMP2 such that, they become available in the system ONLY WHEN  'Release Change' is set on OMR?
    Can 'Parameter Effectivity' be used in this scenario?
    Thank you very much for your advice and guidance,
    BK

    Hi JH thanks for your quick reply,
    Let me describe it more specific, I have two material FG and SFG. Material FG is maintained with valuation type so when we do goods receipt for SFG it's asked to input valuation type in batch field. In stock SFG material qty is separated for each valuation type like batch.
    Now i want to maintain in BOM for FG, where component SFG has fix the valuation type / batch so that in production order we don't have to choose manually. Do you have any idea ?
    Regards,
    Arman

  • New pricing condition update for sales order

    Hi All,
    We need to insert new pricing condition for existing sales order.Could you please sugest any bapi or function module to
    update new pricing condition type.
    Thanks
    Mohit

    One reason to use program is that then the business can be 100% that all the sales orders are "updated"
    (maybe) & if anything goes wrong; The SAP consulting company - who created the program - is to be blamed / is accountable.
    In short business wants to be 100% sure that update has taken place for ALL s orders.
    Is that correct Mohit?
    Edited by: Typewriter on Jun 24, 2011 9:27 AM

  • Update 0VTF Route Determination with a new Shipping Condition

    Hello,
    I have created a new Shipping Condition to have a different route determination.
    I have completed the configuration as Standard SAP procedures for Routes determination.
    However, in order to apply this solution in production, it's going to be necessary to update the new "Shipping Condition" for more than 8,000 routes in Production environment.
    Transaction:  0VTF
    Table:            TROLZ
    According to the Abap team, the changes by CATT is not possible because the Transaction requires specific selection and "double click" functionality.
    Using BDC and LSMW is not possible, since they had problem already in the past with both options.
    I still have sent a message to SAP without any successfull answer.
    Can you let me know if there is a Standard SAP solution for it or a BAPI to massively update the routes determination?
    Thank you

    Hi
    You can use CATT to maintain the route determination. Use tcode SM30/SM31 to update view V_TROLZ01 for recording. You don't have to double click anywhere. Let me know if this works.
    Thanks
    Swagat

Maybe you are looking for