Nexus 5548 rate limit
Hello,
I am trying to setup a rate limit on fex ports (modl is N2K-C2248TP-1GE ) of a 5548UP (non L3) - Software version is : version 6.0(2)N2(2)
I have tried the following setup without success :
ip access-list ACL_CUST
10 permit ip 10.100.100.1/32 10.100.100.2/32
20 permit ip 10.100.100.2/32 10.100.100.1/32
class-map type qos match-all CMQOS_CUST
match access-group name ACL_CUST
policy-map type qos PMQOS_CUST
class CMQOS_CUST
police cir percent 1 bc 200 ms conform transmit violate drop
interface Ethernet161/1/11 - 12
service-policy type qos input PMQOS_CUST
And also tried to use this confioguration :
class-map type qos match-all CMQOS_LIMIT_BP_CUST
match cos 0-7
policy-map type qos PMQOS_LIMIT_BP_CUST
class CMQOS_LIMIT_BP_CUST
police cir percent 1 bc 200 ms conform transmit violate drop
interface Ethernet161/1/11 - 12
service-policy type qos input PMQOS_LIMIT_BP_CUST
The problem is that the bandwith restriction (1 percent of 1Gbit/s shoud be 10Mbit/s) is not working and apparently no restriction is applied
If someone could help me to resolve this issue it would be greatly appreciated
I do have followed this guide
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus5000/sw/qos/503_n1_1/cisco_nexus_5000_qos_config_gd_503_chapter3.html
Thanks !
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus5600/sw/verified_scalability/702N11/b_N5600_Verified_Scalability_702N11/b_N6000_Verified_Scalability_700N11_chapter_01.html
Maximum FEXs per Switch
24
24
Maximum FEXs dual-homed to a vPC Switch Pair
24
24
Similar Messages
-
Urgent help: L3 daughter card for Nexus 5548
Hi
We have 2 Nexus 5548 which is in one vPC doamin. All the servers are teamed to these switches
Requirement
We have to install New L3 daughter card.(N55-D160L3-V2(=))
I have gone through the Cisco websites and found that we have to do the following things
1. software version:
i Nexus 5548P Daughter Card (N55-D160L3)
Before installing a Layer 3 daughter card (N55-D160L3) into a Cisco Nexus 5548P switch, you must upgrade to Cisco NX-OS Release 5.0(3)N1(1b) or NX-OS Release 5.0(3)N1(1c) and then install the card into the chassis.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus5000/sw/release/notes/Rel_5_0_3_N2_1/Nexus5000_Release_Notes_5_0_3_N2.html
2. license:
Also in order to enable this module following license should present on N5k device:
LAN_BASE_SERVICES_PKG - it's free and lifetime.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2121574
I have 2 questions
1- In cisco documentation its says that these cards will be installed in the front where I/O module is and after NX OS 5.X they are hot swappable
Does that mean that no reboot will be required after installing this module (keeping in mind its the first time) so i am confused about the wording ???
Does license installation requires reboot??? in short if you are installing for the first time do we require a reboot ???? that is my main question
2- I have heard there is a known bug which keep rebooting the switch after installation of L3 card
http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCtl45495
has that been address in any version of license or NS-OS yet???
Thanks heaps guys
If the module is still offline when the requirements are met above, it could be a bug.(CSCtl45495) Try reloading the switch.1- In cisco documentation its says that these cards will be installed in the front where I/O module is and after NX OS 5.X they are hot swappable
Does that mean that no reboot will be required after installing this module (keeping in mind its the first time) so i am confused about the wording ???
Answer: -- Yes no reboot is required.
Does license installation requires reboot??? in short if you are installing for the first time do we require a reboot ???? that is my main question
Answer: As you are installing the license for the first time reboot of the box is not required.
2- I have heard there is a known bug which keep rebooting the switch after installation of L3 card
http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCtl45495
has that been address in any version of license or NS-OS yet???
Answer;--No this is not fixed yet.
HTH
Regards
Inayath
********Please do not forget to rate the post if this info is helpfull. -
Hi All,
I have issues with Nexus 5548 ports 1000Gb ports. They go down after sometime with the error " Link not connected " while the links are connected. When i move the connections to other ports they work but after a while the go down again with the same error. I can confirm that is currently down was working and its currently connected. Has anyone seen the error before?
Kindly see the output from the interface thats currently down below:
VNX_NEXUS# sho interface eth1/11
Ethernet1/11 is down (Link not connected)
Hardware: 1000/10000 Ethernet, address: 002a.6a71.1f92 (bia 002a.6a71.1f92)
Description: Link_to_EMC_RPA3
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA
Port mode is access
auto-duplex, 1000 Mb/s, media type is 10G
Beacon is turned off
Input flow-control is off, output flow-control is off
Rate mode is dedicated
Switchport monitor is off
EtherType is 0x8100
Last link flapped 2d23h
Last clearing of "show interface" counters 5w6d
30 seconds input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
30 seconds output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
Load-Interval #2: 5 minute (300 seconds)
input rate 0 bps, 0 pps; output rate 0 bps, 0 pps
RX
43384443 unicast packets 30 multicast packets 1496 broadcast packets
43385969 input packets 7837558138 bytes
0 jumbo packets 0 storm suppression bytes
0 runts 0 giants 0 CRC 0 no buffer
0 input error 0 short frame 0 overrun 0 underrun 0 ignored
0 watchdog 0 bad etype drop 0 bad proto drop 0 if down drop
0 input with dribble 0 input discard
0 Rx pause
TX
56587244 unicast packets 3937125 multicast packets 1487058 broadcast packets
62011427 output packets 14141808286 bytes
0 jumbo packets
0 output errors 0 collision 0 deferred 0 late collision
0 lost carrier 0 no carrier 0 babble 0 output discard
0 Tx pause
18 interface resetsHi Leo,
What confuses me is that the connection was working. I used the correct cable and the port type as well. How do i resolve this? -
UCS FI 6248 to Nexus 5548 San port-channel - not working
Hi all,
I'm sure I am missing something fairly obvious and stupid but I need several sets of eyes and help.
Here is the scenario:
I want to be able to create san port-channels between the FI and Nexus. I don't need to trunk yet as I can't even get the channel to come up.
UCS FI 6248:
Interfaces fc1/31-32
Nexus 5548
interfaces fc2/15-16
FI is in end-host mode and Nexus is running NPIV mode with fport-channel-trunk feature enabled.
I'm going to output the relevants configurations below.
Nexus 5548:
NX5KA(config)# show feature | include enabled
fcoe 1 enabled
fex 1 enabled
fport-channel-trunk 1 enabled
hsrp_engine 1 enabled
interface-vlan 1 enabled
lacp 1 enabled
lldp 1 enabled
npiv 1 enabled
sshServer 1 enabled
vpc 1 enabled
interface san-port-channel 133
channel mode active
no switchport trunk allowed vsan all
switchport trunk mode off
interface fc2/15
switchport trunk mode off
channel-group 133 force
no shutdown
interface fc2/16
switchport trunk mode off
channel-group 133 force
no shutdown
NX5KA# show vsan membership
vsan 1 interfaces:
fc2/13 fc2/14
vsan 133 interfaces:
fc2/15 fc2/16 san-port-channel 133
vsan 4079(evfp_isolated_vsan) interfaces:
vsan 4094(isolated_vsan) interfaces:
NX5KA# show san-port-channel summary
U-Up D-Down B-Hot-standby S-Suspended I-Individual link
summary header
Group Port- Type Protocol Member Ports
Channel
133 San-po133 FC PCP (D) FC fc2/15(D) fc2/16(D)
UCS Fabric Interconnect outputs:
UCS-FI-A-A(nxos)# show san-port-channel summary
U-Up D-Down B-Hot-standby S-Suspended I-Individual link
summary header
Group Port- Type Protocol Member Ports
Channel
133 San-po133 FC PCP (D) FC fc1/31(D) fc1/32(D)
UCS-FI-A-A(nxos)#
UCS-FI-A-A(nxos)# show run int fc1/31-32
!Command: show running-config interface fc1/31-32
!Time: Fri Dec 20 22:58:51 2013
version 5.2(3)N2(2.21b)
interface fc1/31
switchport mode NP
channel-group 133 force
no shutdown
interface fc1/32
switchport mode NP
channel-group 133 force
no shutdown
UCS-FI-A-A(nxos)#
UCS-FI-A-A(nxos)# show run int san-port-channel 133
!Command: show running-config interface san-port-channel 133
!Time: Fri Dec 20 22:59:09 2013
version 5.2(3)N2(2.21b)
interface san-port-channel 133
channel mode active
switchport mode NP!Command: show running-config interface san-port-channel 133
!Time: Sat May 16 04:59:07 2009
version 5.1(3)N1(1)
interface san-port-channel 133
channel mode active
switchport mode F
switchport trunk mode off
Changed it as you suggested...
Followed the order of operations for "no shut"
Nexus FC -> Nexus SAN-PC -> FI FC -> FI SAN-PC.
Didn't work:
NX5KA(config-if)# show san-port-channel summary
U-Up D-Down B-Hot-standby S-Suspended I-Individual link
summary header
Group Port- Type Protocol Member Ports
Channel
133 San-po133 FC PCP (D) FC fc2/15(D) fc2/16(D)
NX5KA(config-if)#
Here is the output as you requested:
NX5KA(config-if)# show int san-port-channel 133
san-port-channel 133 is down (No operational members)
Hardware is Fibre Channel
Port WWN is 24:85:00:2a:6a:5a:81:00
Admin port mode is F, trunk mode is off
snmp link state traps are enabled
Port vsan is 133
1 minute input rate 1256 bits/sec, 157 bytes/sec, 0 frames/sec
1 minute output rate 248 bits/sec, 31 bytes/sec, 0 frames/sec
3966 frames input, 615568 bytes
0 discards, 0 errors
0 CRC, 0 unknown class
0 too long, 0 too short
2956 frames output, 143624 bytes
0 discards, 0 errors
46 input OLS, 41 LRR, 73 NOS, 0 loop inits
257 output OLS, 189 LRR, 219 NOS, 0 loop inits
last clearing of "show interface" counters never
Member[1] : fc2/15
Member[2] : fc2/16
NX5KA(config-if)#
NX5KA(config-if)# show int brief
Interface Vsan Admin Admin Status SFP Oper Oper Port
Mode Trunk Mode Speed Channel
Mode (Gbps)
fc2/13 1 auto on sfpAbsent -- -- --
fc2/14 1 auto on sfpAbsent -- -- --
fc2/15 133 F off init swl -- 133
fc2/16 133 F off init swl -- 133 -
Possible to rate limit console input?
I built a tool that allows us to input device information such as IP, VLAN, etc, etc and this tool builds the entire config file that can be pasted into a switch/router. The problem is that when I start getting down near the banner and motd sections, the console cannot keep up with the input and it drops lines of input.
Is there a way to rate limit the input when large configs are pasted into con 0?I built a tool that allows us to input device information such as IP, VLAN, etc, etc and this tool builds the entire config file that can be pasted into a switch/router. The problem is that when I start getting down near the banner and motd sections, the console cannot keep up with the input and it drops lines of input.
Is there a way to rate limit the input when large configs are pasted into con 0? -
FCoE with Cisco Nexus 5548 switches and VMware ESXi 4.1
Can someone share with me what needs to be setup on the Cisco Nexus side to work with VMware in the following scenario?
Two servers with two cards dual port FCoE cards with two ports connected to two Nexus 5548 switches that are clusterd together. We want to team the ports together on the VMware side using IP Hash so what should be done on the cisco side for this to work?
Thanks...Andres,
The Cisco Road Map for the 5010 and 5020 doesn't include extending the current total (12) FEX capabities. The 5548 and 5596 will support more (16) per 55xxk, and with the 7K will support upto 32 FEX's.
Documentation has been spotty on this subject, because the term 5k indicates that all 5000 series switches will support extended FEX's which is not the case only the 55xx will support more than 12 FEX. Maybe in the future the terminology for the 5k series should be term 5000 series and 5500 series Nexus, there are several differences and advancements between the two series. -
Bandwidth Rate-Limit -w- WWR-Queue
How would one convert a layer-2 port's "switchport rate-limit" bandwidth statement, on a 6509 -w- WS-X6748-SFP ports, to a routed/layer-3 "wrr-queue" bandwidth statement policy? Basically trying to hard-core the port's speed to 20MB. Current/tested layer-2 port bandwidth setting:
rate-limit input 20000000 5000 5000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
rate-limit output 20000000 5000 5000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
Got lost in how to use/configure all WRR's four queues... just need to limit the port's bandwidth to 20MB. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Thanks, Kevin1) Enabled QoS globally...
2960(config)#mls qos
2) Configure an ACL to define the matched traffic...
2960(config)#access-list 111 permit ip any any
3) Configure a class map for the matched traffic...
2960(config)#class-map traffic
2960(config-cmap)#match access 111
4) Configure a policy-map to define action...
2960(config)#policy-map Control
2960(config-pmap)#class traffic
2960(config-pmap-c)#police 10000000 8000 exceed-action drop
5) Attached the policy-map to the interface.
a) Example
-In this case, I'll attach the policy map to port_1....
2960(config)#int fa0/1
2960(config-if)#service-policy input Control
>>>>>> This will rate-limit traffic coming from the PC -
How to rate-limit different IP's entering/leaving an Interface?
Hi There,
We are an ISP and have an interconnect with say Provider A. Customers of ours use Provider A for layer 2 and us for Layer 3 (IP/Internet).
Customer #1 to #100 --- (10Mb) --> Provider A ---> ISP ---> Internet
We'd like to rate limit some customers to 2mb/sec (in/out) on our end because at present they have a 10mb/sec connection coming from Provider A.
The config we use to peer with Provider A is this:
interface GigabitEthernet0/1.120
description Interconnect with Provider A
bandwidth 400000
encapsulation dot1Q 120
ip address A.B.C.1 255.255.255.252
Customers of ours are simply routed out through this interface like so:
Customer #1:
ip route W.X.Y.Z. 255.255.255.255 A.B.C.2
Customer #2:
ip route J.K.L.M 255.255.255.255 A.B.C.2
Is there a way to rate limit both these customers without needing to create a separate class map for each like so:
class-map match-all CUSTOMER-1-2MB
match access-group name ACL-CUSTOMER-1
class-map match-all CUSTOMER-2-2MB
match access-group name ACL-CUSTOMER-2
policy-map POLICY-RATE-LIMIT
class CUSTOMER-1-2MB
police 2000000 375000 750000
class CUSTOMER-2-2MB
police 2000000 375000 750000
interface GigabitEthernet0/1.120
service-policy input POLICY-RATE-LIMIT
service-policy output POLICY-RATE-LIMIT
I've done this in the lab and I know it works, so Customer #1 ends up with 2mb/sec and Customer #2 gets 2mb/sec too.
But in production, I'm talking about 100's of customers which we simply route out of this interface. I can't imagine having to configure 100's of class maps and policy maps for each customer to rate limit them to 2mb/sec like in the config above.
Is there a better way to do this on the router???
Thanks.
AndyHi All,
Doing what Laurent suggested works great. We are able to rate-limit the desired customers by having a separate class-map for each customer that needs to be rate limited under the single policy-map.
But now we're finding that the CPU utilization has increased by 20% because of this.
We're pushing about 400M through this interface and rate limiting 7 customers on it.
Given the large traffic flow through this interface (400M), is it common to see an increase in CPU utilisation by 20%???
When we take the service-policy off the interface, sure enough the CPU drops by 20%.
Here's the MQC applied:
interface GigabitEthernet0/1.120
bandwidth 400000
encapsulation dot1Q 120
ip address 203.17.x.x 255.255.255.252
ip flow ingress
service-policy input RATE-LIMIT
service-policy output RATE-LIMIT
class-map match-all CLASS-TCS-200338
description Customer #1 rate limited to 4mb/sec
match access-group name ACL-TCS-200338
class-map match-all CLASS-TCS-200208
description Customer #2 rate limited to 2mb/sec
match access-group name ACL-TCS-200208
class-map match-all CLASS-TCS-205593
description Customer #3 rate limited to 3mb/sec
match access-group name ACL-TCS-205593
class-map match-all CLASS-TCS-205679
description Customer #4 rate limited to 4mb/sec
match access-group name ACL-TCS-205679
class-map match-all CLASS-TCS-200441
description Customer #5 rate limited to 4mb/sec
match access-group name ACL-TCS-200441
class-map match-all CLASS-TCS-200005
description Customer #6 rate limited to 2mb/sec
match access-group name ACL-TCS-200005
class-map match-all CLASS-TCS-205560
description Customer #7 rate limited to 4mb/sec
match access-group name ACL-TCS-205560
policy-map RATE-LIMIT
class CLASS-TCS-200005
police 2000000 375000 750000 conform-action transmit exceed-action transmit violate-action drop
class CLASS-TCS-200208
police 2000000 375000 750000 conform-action transmit exceed-action transmit violate-action drop
class CLASS-TCS-200441
police 4000000 750000 1500000 conform-action transmit exceed-action transmit violate-action drop
class CLASS-TCS-200338
police 4000000 750000 1500000 conform-action transmit exceed-action transmit violate-action drop
class CLASS-TCS-205679
police 4000000 750000 1500000 conform-action transmit exceed-action transmit violate-action drop
class CLASS-TCS-205560
police 4000000 750000 1500000 conform-action transmit exceed-action transmit violate-action drop
class CLASS-TCS-205593
police 3000000 562500 1125000 conform-action transmit exceed-action transmit violate-action drop
Is this the correct behaviour of applying the service-policy to the interface whereby the CPU increases by 20% or can the MQC be fine tuned to have less of an impact on the CPU?
Is the router just overloaded, taking into account it's only pushing about 400M? Should it be able to do more than this??
Thanks.
Andy -
Prime Infrastructure 2.0 and Nexus 5548, SSH credentials fail
Hi,
I'm having problem getting the Prime Infrastructure 2.0 to login with SSH to a Nexus 5548 to do an inventory. I get "Wrong Telnet/SSH credentials". But when I use the same credentials from another SSH-client it works fine. I also tested to SSH from the console of the Prime-server and that also works fine.
Any ideas???
Regards,
Stefan LindkvistI have PI 2.0 working against Nexus 5k's in two different installations. See below for an example (click to enlarge).
Have you put in an entry in both the login and enable fields (even though they are not separately required when logging in directly)? -
Per user bandwidth rate limit.
How to configure per user bandwidth rate limit for wireless guest client, authentication server is ISE 1.2 & wireless controller is 5760.
The Cisco 5760 WLC supports better QoS than other c
ontrollers, allowing prioritization of mission-crit
ical
applications:
●
The Cisco 5760 WLC supports four wireless hardware
queues and priority-based queuing compared to
software-based queuing in existing controllers.
●
The Cisco 5760 WLC follows MQC based commands, allo
wing usage of exact commands for configuring
QoS on different types of network devices.
●
The Cisco 5760 WLC supports QoS policies to be appl
ied in a hierarchical fashion with more granularity
per SSID per radio, while on the current controller
s granularity is per WLAN.
●
The Cisco 5760 WLC supports approximate fair bandwi
dth to make sure of fairness at client, SSID, and
radio levels for Non-Real Time (NRT) traffic. There
fore, if one user consumes excessive bandwidth, we
can
limit the amount of bandwidth that user receives an
d thereby not deprive other users. -
WLC 5508 and Anchor/GuestNet rate limit traffic?
Running WLCs 5508s 7.0.116.0 with GuestNet and Anchor setup, how can I limit the bandwidth on the GuestNet SSDI to 2 Mbps, etc?
The DMZ WLC (Anchor) runs thru a ASA 5508 7x, can I rate limit traffic via ASA?That's really a matter of preference. This document describes things to keep in mind when altering these QoS profile configurations, FYI.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/docs/wireless/controller/7.0MR1/configuration/guide/cg_controller_setting.html#wp1254532
It really depends on how many guests, what type of traffic, etc, to make a judgement call as to where you should set these. I'm sorry but I don't have any examples from existing configurations, but hopefully the document explains how to best alter these settings. -
WLC user rate limit on guest ssid anchor controller
Hi,
I have been looking through the forums & some cisco documents but not found a good example similar to what I am seeking to do so now I am turning to the expertise of my peers.
We have been deploying 3502 APs remotely to locations with full T1s that backhaul to where I sit at HQ.
Both the foreign and anchor controller are here at my location.
I am seeking to rate limit per user the bandwidth each client will get on the guest internet ssid.
As you know this traffic is encapsulated in capwap between the AP and the controller so I cant use a standard ACL on the switch or router.
We are trying to keep the guest internet access usage in check on the T1 at any given site so the other ssid's & local lan traffic is not overly competing for the bandwidth.
I found the place to edit the default profiles in the controller but the documentation really isnt clear on best practices.
So I put it to you my fellow wireless engineers to suggest how you are implementing bandwidth management on your wireless guest internet.
Thanks guys!
Oh and here is my hardware & software levels.
5508wlc - forgeign
4402wlc - anchor
Software Version
7.0.230.0Amjad,
Thank you for taking the time to respond as well as the document link.
It was pretty clear on the steps and what it would impact.
Two things that push me for a different solution (assuming their is one).
Note The values that you configure for the per-user bandwidth contracts affect only the amount of bandwidth going downstream (from the access point to the wireless client). They do not affect the bandwidth for upstream traffic (from the client to the access point).
As you can see from the above note taken out of the linked document the roll based rate limit doesnt really rate limit the T1 traffic any guest user consumes it only limits usage from the AP down to the client.
#1 I am looking for a solution that limits the users up & down streams (if possible) & also before it leaves the AP for the T1.
The idea is to limit WAN utilization.
#2 I read in the forums here others asking about the "user role" and saw some comments saying it is not considered "best practice" to use user roles.
Let me clarify that our guest ssid's are using the http webpage pass through for authentication and it is really only the tic mark to indicate they understand the terms and conditions of using our internet as a guest service. No actual user accounts are used on the guest ssid's.
***One last question about this and any other changes***
Will any change I make be on the "Foreign, Anchor" or both Controllers? -
Telephony Issues on Nexus 5548
Dear Viewers,
I have Nexus 5548 devices in one of my client data centers and i have one 3750 switch to which all of these Avaya voice servers connect.
The 3750 switch was initially connected through a L2 Link to a 6509 catalyst switch and the telephony applications were working correctly.
The problem arises when i move this 3750 layer 2 link to a Nexus 5548 (OS version 5.1(3)N1 switch. All telephony calls coming from the outside (External calls) are not working as required but the internal calls work as usual.
What is odd is that when i migrate this L2 link back to the 6509 switch, all works as usual. This is just a layer 2 connection and i am wondering why this is not possible.
The vlan is accepted on all relevant trunks. I also deactivated igmp snooping on this voice vlan on the Nexus 5548 thinking it would help but in vain.
Any ideas and suggestions are welcome.
regards.
AlainThis is my radius config...... on a 5K
radius-server timeout 7
radius-server host 10.28.42.20 key 7 "Password" auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 authentication accounting
radius-server host 10.28.42.21 key 7 "Password" auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 authentication accounting
aaa group server radius Radius-Servers
server 10.28.42.20
server 10.28.42.21
aaa authentication login default group Radius-Servers
ip radius source-interface Vlan1
aaa authentication login default fallback error local
And it is currently working. On the radius server i also had to do this to make the users admins once logged in:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/137181/nexus-integration-admin-access-free-radius -
Rate-limit command 3560 does it exist?
I have just come across a command in my router IOS which might be useful too me. I was wondering if the following command is available on a 3560 Switch. I don't see it on my 3550 but the IOS is quite old. I don't have a 3560 avaiable currently to check.
Config t > int vlan x > rate-limit input/output
does this exist on the 3560? I am also interest if it does in the Bits per second range and if available input/output.
Thanks for any helpHello,
what kind of feature are you looking for?
CAR?
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1835/products_command_reference_chapter09186a0080087f26.html#wp1037428
For command list check the following link:
Catalyst 3560 Switch Command Reference, Rel. 12.2(25)SEE
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat3560/12225see/cr/index.htm
For QOS configs:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat3560/12225see/scg/swqos.htm
If you need to rate limit traffic on an interface check:
Limiting the Bandwidth on an Egress Interface
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat3560/12225see/scg/swqos.htm#wp1253412
Hope this help a bit,
if it does, please rate this post.
Vlad -
I would like to know how to set the dynamic rate limit on the wan and the lan on the spa2102 voip adapter. can anyone help?
There is no such function on any of the SPA2xxx or SPA3xxx series voice router.
Maybe you are looking for
-
I have ipad 1 . And i want to update it from ios 4.3.5 to ios 7 but i can't why ?? Please help me becouse i can't download apps from app store !!!!! I would suggust: 1 to create a big camera for i pads and ipods and iphones so we can put it in anothe
-
Performance in function module interfaces
Does anyone know if there is any significant performance difference between passing a set of export parameters back from a function module as opposed to putting the parameters in a table and passing back the table. I am working on a function that in
-
Hi Please help me, I install a WIC-4ESW card in Cisco Router 1760 then I got the following error messages: *Mar 1 00:00:09.247: %ESWMOD-3-NOT_RESPONDING: Ethernet Switch Module is not responding *Mar 1 00:00:09.247: %ESWMOD-3-INITFAILURE: Initial
-
I have just downloaded Creative cloud and am trying to install on my 2010 MacBook Pro with OS 10.9.3 When I install I am not getting the signon button, just a blue spinning. I saw the signon button blip by once but then it went right to the spinning.
-
For example, other apps I've designed and built I normally use a sliding draw effect that nav's to other docs in it's folio, the advantage I find is it's nice and tidy as all you see is a tab on the side of the screen rather than a nav system thats v