Nexus 7K high kernel CPU

Hi,
I have  a problem with high CPU on Nexus 7010
DC_Core_SW1# sh system resources 
Load average:   1 minute: 2.59   5 minutes: 2.46   15 minutes: 2.23
Processes   :   1085 total, 6 running
CPU states  :   0.0% user,   100.0% kernel,   0.0% idle
Memory usage:   8254672K total,   3327920K used,   4926752K free
Current memory status: OK
oftware
  BIOS:      version 3.22.0
  kickstart: version 5.2(7)
  system:    version 5.2(7)
  BIOS compile time:       02/20/10
  kickstart image file is: bootflash:///n7000-s1-kickstart.5.2.7.bin
  kickstart compile time:  12/25/2020 12:00:00 [09/17/2012 00:00:14]
  system image file is:    bootflash:///n7000-s1-dk9.5.2.7.bin
  system compile time:     8/17/2012 17:00:00 [09/17/2012 00:59:04]
Hardware
  cisco Nexus7000 C7010 (10 Slot) Chassis ("Supervisor module-1X")
  Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU         with 8254672 kB of memory.
  Processor Board ID XXXXXXX
  Device name: DC_Core_SW1
  bootflash:    2000880 kB
  slot0:        2044854 kB (expansion flash)
It would be nice if someone can help me, it looks like a BUG
Best regars
Goce

Or hardware issue :(

Similar Messages

  • High load CPU X process

    Hi,
    I'm using ArchLinux 64bit, with KDE 4.3.4 on a sony vaio, everything work fine, but after some normal work I see that process X takes more then 90% of CPU and never slow down. Even if I closed all my application it stays at 90%. I don't know how to see which application could cause this.
    As first impression it seems when I use samba adn move some file from my machine to a windows machine, but today it takes high load cpu without using samba, so I don't know what else do, any good advice?
    thanks a lot
    cesare

    Hi thank you very much for your reply, I'm sorry to reply just now.
    Anyway I have a Sony Vaio VGN.SR21M, using opensource driver xf86-video-radeonhd with hardware acc on. My graphics card is a Radeon3400HD
    I used the closed driver till I switch to Xorg 1.7 and so I can't using it anymore so I switched to the free one.
    Should I disable desktop effects?
    Thanks again
    Cesare
    Last edited by cesare (2010-01-25 08:48:01)

  • Windows 32 . Kernel CPU Spike and Performance issues.

    Hi
    We have several oracle databases that run on windows 32bit OS. ORacle version 11.1.0.7.0. All of a sudden there is a spike in the Kernel cpu usage ( Goto task manager -> View -> Show Kernel times). The kernel cpu time is shown in red which is around 30 -40% in our case and is consistant.
    On one of the databases our prior dba upgraded to patch29, and reloaded the dictionary and this solved the problem for some time.
    Has anyone experienced this before , how can we resolve this. Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks

    sb92075 wrote:
    there is a spike in the Kernel cpu usage Kernel spike is OS issue; not lowly application.SB92075,
    It is often user mode applications that drive the kernel mode CPU consumption. See the following two articles and the attached comments:
    http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2010/06/16/systemkernel-mode-cpu-usage-what-is-wrong-with-this-quote/
    http://kevinclosson.wordpress.com/2010/06/17/running-oracle-database-on-a-system-with-40-kernel-mode-overhead-are-you-normal/
    To the OP,
    With a Windows server, you can use a VBS script to drill into the specific session that is generating a lot of kernel mode CPU time. Part 1 of the two part series shows the output, while part 2 of the series shows the script that generated the output:
    http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2010/01/09/drilling-into-session-detail-from-the-operating-system-on-the-windows-platform/
    Charles Hooper
    Co-author of "Expert Oracle Practices: Oracle Database Administration from the Oak Table"
    http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/
    IT Manager/Oracle DBA
    K&M Machine-Fabricating, Inc.

  • How to troubleshooting high sys cpu usage ???

    how to troubleshooting high sys cpu usage ???

    Hi,I have post the top 5 event above.
    before tuning:
    SQL ordered by Gets
    •     Resources reported for PL/SQL code includes the resources used by all SQL statements called by the code.
    •     Total Buffer Gets: 4,348,081
    •     Captured SQL account for 73.3% of Total
    Buffer Gets      Executions      Gets per Exec      %Total     CPU Time (s)     Elapsed Time (s)     SQL Id     SQL Module     SQL Text
    1,768,970     2,593     682.21     40.68     32.47     1375.28     a2vm9mf99ma3p
           select
    712,504     2,883     247.14     16.39     13.14     83.85     66vrg3gz2stvf
           select
    130,928     7,901     16.57     3.01     7.83     10.49     ctnn0bpfd3v5k
           select
    92,800     2,902     31.98     2.13     2.73     6.40     2985xzq8x547u
           select
    81,498     27,159     3.00     1.87     3.12     3.98     1prkhshjp25sc
           select
    60,513     2,631     23.00     1.39     2.29     5.64     2d8w9016z0kug
           select
    55,416     15,835     3.50     1.27     2.12     2.39     8tk22zsappg9m
           select
    44,879     15,838     2.83     1.03     1.74     1.89     c6sjzyfh9jmz0
           select
    31,677     10,558     3.00     0.73     1.15     1.24     5yr7z98xmcpqz
           select
    26,346     13,172     2.00     0.61     1.31     1.47     36shs0f8kxp5z
           select after tuning:
    SQL ordered by Gets
    •     Resources reported for PL/SQL code includes the resources used by all SQL statements called by the code.
    •     Total Buffer Gets: 7,734,429
    •     Captured SQL account for 99.4% of Total
    Buffer Gets      Executions      Gets per Exec      %Total     CPU Time (s)     Elapsed Time (s)     SQL Id     SQL Module     SQL Text
    1,728,723     99,759     17.33     22.35     113.87     119.45     309a6ak09rud2
           select
    996,920     332,437     3.00     12.89     41.57     44.03     1prkhshjp25sc
           select
    964,093     199,469     4.83     12.46     32.19     33.28     8tk22zsappg9m
           select
    531,776     33,241     16.00     6.88     34.38     36.36     2985xzq8x547u
           select
    432,140     199,473     2.17     5.59     20.86     21.57     c6sjzyfh9jmz0
           select
    332,406     166,226     2.00     4.30     17.28     17.84     36shs0f8kxp5z
           select
    265,872     33,234     8.00     3.44     7.74     8.09     4a34fa9tt90wx
           select *
    232,617     33,243     7.00     3.01     7.54     7.78     53rvrd0ug5gwm
           select
    232,603     33,237     7.00     3.01     9.24     9.83     9254c5ag3z9qd
           select
    232,589     33,239     7.00     3.01     8.11     8.40     gum17w9qgrw8p
           select co
    232,547     33,246     6.99     3.01     12.56     13.21     cx8yttzjh9ftz
           select
    232,484     33,244     6.99     3.01     10.08     11.07     gbx7hs3ykpjqs
           select
    199,446     99,753     2.00     2.58     11.27     11.89     2hpja5k312kwa
           select
    199,428     33,241     6.00     2.58     9.15     9.56     2d8w9016z0kug
           select
    199,389     199,469     1.00     2.58     19.59     20.25     b9j0pb2d5cn69
           select
    133,004     33,253     4.00     1.72     17.56     18.67     a2vm9mf99ma3p
           select
    99,756     33,255     3.00     1.29     3.77     3.92     5yr7z98xmcpqz
           select
    99,747     33,258     3.00     1.29     4.58     4.70     1fnshqnqxjtqz
           select

  • Extremely high system CPU load on my new 2012 Macbook Pro

    I just brought my brand new 2012 Macbook Pro (non-retina) home from the store and noticed that it was running INCREDIBLY slow. I opened up the activity monitor and found that the system's CPU load is consistently around 70%-90%. I haven't installed any software outside of google chrome, although the issue was happening even before I installed google chrome.
    Here are screenshots of my macbook's specs
    Here's a screenshot of the processes sorted by %CPU
    Here's a screenshot of the processes sorted by CPU Time
    Any idea what would cause such a high system CPU load? Again I haven't installed any software outside of google chrome, and I don't have anything hooked up to my Macbook. This issue happens when my Macbook is both plugged and unplugged and I haven't noticed any overheating or extensive fan use.

    harkiamsuperman,
    your first image shows Chrome using over half of the CPU time. Note that Chrome on Mavericks is more CPU-intensive than other browsers, since Google does not provide a 64-bit version of the app for OS X.
    Since you’ve just brought your MacBook Pro home, perhaps Spotlight is doing its initial indexing of your internal disk; that could be one possible explanation. If that is the cause, then your CPU usage should settle down after it finishes.
    If you’d like to try something simple and immediate, you could reset your MacBook Pro’s System Management Controller, to see if that makes a difference.

  • High Recursive CPU using LMT

    I ran a statspack report for the full day and noticed extremely high recursive CPU as being a large portion of the overall response time. Any ideas on how to minimize this? Or, how to investigate culprits?
    Using 9.2.0.3 on solaris.

    Find the queries that are using CPU intensively and try to optimize them..
    There might be poor joins or excessive sorting.

  • High proc cpu

    I'm getting a high proc cpu at 92%. It show the SptBpduRx at 87%. How can I pinpoint from which point is the traffic coming? It is a Cisco 6509.

    We have 5000, 5500 , 2900, 1900 switches going into the main switch (6509). We don't use it as a router for the moment. We have STP disable on all of our switches.
    Carlos

  • High system CPU usage only recoverable by rebooting

    Hi,
    I'm having this problem since I started using my new iMac 27'. Before that I was using the same version of OSX (10.6.1) in the MacbookPro without this issue.
    So it's being hard to reproduce the problem, but suddenly there is a spike in CPU usage from System Processes (on average 40-50% if "% System" in the Activity Monitor), but strangely when I choose to show only system processes, there's no process that is actually using that amount of CPU. And the system gets REALLY slow.
    While trying to reproduce the problem, I rebooted and started iTunes. And it happened. Even after closing iTunes the high "ghost" CPU usage gets really high and never recovers unless I reboot.
    Is anyone else having similar issues?

    inaciog wrote:
    So it's being hard to reproduce the problem, but suddenly there is a spike in CPU usage from System Processes (on average 40-50% if "% System" in the Activity Monitor), but strangely when I choose to show only system processes, there's no process that is actually using that amount of CPU.
    Hi, and welcome to the forums.
    Don't limit it to System Processes. There's often too much interaction between user and system processes. Choose either +All Processes+ or +Active Processes.+
    You probably want to select +View > Update Frequency > Less Often+ from the menubar, too, both so you can read the screen and so Activity Monitor itself won't take up too much CPU. Then sort the list by the +% CPU+ column so the largest numbers are on top.
    Watch it for a while. Many processes will "spike" up and down normally, as they do something, then go idle.
    And the system gets REALLY slow.
    That's when you need to see what the top one or two processes are.
    If you see +Process Names+ you don't recognize, post them here or consult http://triviaware.com/macprocess/all

  • How to find culprid of high SYS CPU % ?

    Does anyone know a command to find the culprid of a high CPU utilization of kernel syscalls?
    My actual SYS CPU usage is over twice the USR value and I think this not normal.
    Thanks in advance,
    HJ.

    i am curious. have u been reading the details off your process manager or through ps -ef or pgrep?
    but i do agree, that sounds alittle strange for any process to be taking up so much.

  • Shared NFS Disk causing high Wait CPU on dd command

    Hi,
    we have mounted the partition /OVS to a NFS shared disk, and we are running a virtual machine from this shared disk.
    Doing the following command in the virtual machine, we calculate the needed time to write a file into the NFS disk with block size = 1M. We also tried with different block sizes.
    time dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/1GB.test bs=1M count=1024
    1024+0 records in
    1024+0 records out
    real     0m4.085s
    user     0m0.000s
    If we check the Virtual Machine CPU Usage during this process, Wait CPU time highly increases as we show below (doesn't matter the block size)
    !http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/7651/highwaitcpu.th.png!
    http://img69.imageshack.us/i/highwaitcpu.png/
    In the other hand, executing the same command in a local disk, Wait CPU is really low and normal.
    Is a NFS issue? Is the right way to work? Do we have a wrong Virtual Machine configuration?
    Thanks in advance,
    Marc
    Edited by: Marc Caubet on Nov 23, 2009 8:20 AM
    Edited by: Marc Caubet on Nov 23, 2009 8:20 AM
    Edited by: Marc Caubet on Nov 23, 2009 8:21 AM

    Hi Herb,
    thanks for your fast reply. Elapsed time using NFS should be lower than using the local disk since throughput is faster. This should be in theory
    I took some samples by using the NFS. and I got the following numbers:
    +0.00user 3.75system 0:12.46elapsed 30%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k+
    +1920inputs+2097160outputs (0major+159minor)pagefaults 0swaps+
    +0.00user 4.14system 0:08.83elapsed 46%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k+
    +112inputs+2097152outputs (0major+159minor)pagefaults 0swaps+
    +0.00user 4.24system 0:04.46elapsed 94%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k+
    +8inputs+2097152outputs (0major+159minor)pagefaults 0swaps+
    +0.00user 4.29system 2:06.02elapsed 3%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k+
    +88inputs+2097160outputs (0major+160minor)pagefaults 0swaps+
    +0.00user 4.08system 0:04.14elapsed 98%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k+
    +0inputs+2097160outputs (0major+159minor)pagefaults 0swaps+
    +0.00user 4.12system 0:04.43elapsed 92%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k+
    +0inputs+2097152outputs (0major+160minor)pagefaults 0swaps+
    +0.00user 4.25system 0:04.34elapsed 97%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k+
    +0inputs+2097152outputs (0major+160minor)pagefaults 0swaps+
    +0.00user 4.29system 3:44.51elapsed 1%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k+
    +0inputs+2097160outputs (0major+160minor)pagefaults 0swaps+
    +0.00user 4.10system 0:04.18elapsed 97%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k+
    +0inputs+2097160outputs (0major+159minor)pagefaults 0swaps+
    +0.00user 3.96system 0:04.00elapsed 98%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k+
    +0inputs+2097152outputs (0major+159minor)pagefaults 0swaps+
    +0.00user 4.06system 0:04.16elapsed 97%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k+
    +0inputs+2097152outputs (0major+159minor)pagefaults 0swaps+
    +0.00user 4.06system 0:04.15elapsed 97%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k+
    +0inputs+2097152outputs (0major+160minor)pagefaults 0swaps+
    Some examples with local disk:
    +0.00user 3.52system 0:07.46elapsed 47%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata+ 0maxresident)k+
    +96inputs+2097160outputs (0major+159minor)pagefaults 0swaps+
    +0.00user 3.77system 0:04.51elapsed 83%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
    +0inputs+2097160outputs (0major+160minor)pagefaults 0swaps
    +0.00user 3.85system 0:08.65elapsed 44%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k+
    +104inputs+2097160outputs (0major+160minor)pagefaults 0swaps+
    +0.00user 3.80system 0:04.73elapsed 80%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k+
    +8inputs+2097160outputs (0major+160minor)pagefaults 0swaps+
    +0.00user 3.90system 0:04.79elapsed 81%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k+
    +16inputs+2097160outputs (0major+159minor)pagefaults 0swaps+
    +0.00user 3.91system 0:04.37elapsed 89%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k+
    +0inputs+2097160outputs (0major+159minor)pagefaults 0swaps+
    +0.00user 4.03system 0:19.57elapsed 20%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k+
    +160inputs+2097160outputs (0major+160minor)pagefaults 0swaps+
    +0.00user 3.44system 0:05.53elapsed 62%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k+
    +0inputs+2097152outputs (0major+160minor)pagefaults 0swaps+
    +0.00user 3.44system 0:05.20elapsed 66%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k+
    +8inputs+2097160outputs (0major+159minor)pagefaults 0swaps+
    +0.00user 3.43system 0:07.04elapsed 48%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k+
    +120inputs+2097160outputs (0major+159minor)pagefaults 0swaps+
    +0.00user 3.42system 0:06.34elapsed 53%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k+
    +56inputs+2097160outputs (0major+159minor)pagefaults 0swaps+
    +0.01user 3.59system 0:13.35elapsed 26%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k+
    +160inputs+2097160outputs (1major+175minor)pagefaults 0swaps+
    Elapsed time in NFS case, sometimes is really huge. Hence, this should mean network problems, am I right? Maybe we should increase bandwidth. Actually we got 1GB of network connection shared with 10 hypervisors.
    Edited by: Marc Caubet on Nov 24, 2009 6:38 AM

  • Finding Current High-Consuming CPU SQLs

    Hi All,
    How do we find SQL's consuming most CPU at the current moment. If I find SQL's from V$SQLAREA and sort descending based on CPU_TIME, it may be idle sessions as CPU_TIME gives the cumulative cpu time. Current high-consuming SQL may not even figure on top if cumulative cpu time is less. I am interested in finding top 10 SQL's at the current moment. Is there a way we find the top consumers of CPU?
    Thanks,
    ...

    you can use top,nmon or topass command at OS level to find out PID consuming maximum CPU and resources .. you can use this PID and qury against
    v$sesson , V$process and v$SQL to find out user session and SQL been consuming max CPU time and resources.
    select a.username , a.program , to_char(a.LOGON_TIME,'dd-mon-yy:hh24:mi'),c.sql_text from v$session a ,
    v$process b , v$sql c where
    a.paddr=b.addr and a.sql_id=c.sql_id and b.spid='you OS PID' ;

  • LR 1.1 High (~60%) CPU utilization when LR is idle

    When I startup LR without doing anything, in the LIBRARY module LR idles at just under 60% CPU utilization (dual processors, 4GB mem) and has been for the last 20 minutes. The LR catalog and preview files have all been defragmented. The LR catalog has been optimized. This situation seems to happen about 3/4ths the time that I run LR. It does not prevent other LR activities.
    A) Is there anyway to discover what LR is doing?
    B) Any ideas on how to fix?

    I haven't done an import, nor asked it to build previews, and there is nothing showing in the upper left where it shows long running tasks. I haven't done an import in a while. It could be building XMP files, if those weren't built at conversion time. I asked this time around to have XMP files built. I am hoping that XMP files might make it easier to work with DxO.
    After about 20 minutes it stops the high utilization.
    Just strange behavior, not a problem in itself, but maybe related to some problem.
    Thanks,

  • Nexus 5k High Fan RPM

    Hi,
    The fans 1 & 2 in Module 1 on the Nexus5K are still experiencing the very high RPM and speed issue.
    I have replaced the fan from another operational Nexus5K, and the fans are fine in the other Nexus. The replacement fans also have the same issues, so it is not a fan hardware issue.
    There are no threshold alarms. the only log entry that is related to this is as follows:
    %NOHMS-2-NOHMS_ENV_ERR_FAN_SPEED: System minor alarm in fan tray 1: fan speed is out of range on fan 1. 7950 to 12500 rpm expected.
    I have provided the output for both the fan detail and the temperature.
    N5K-01# sh environment fan detail
    Fan:
    Module  Fan  Airflow        Speed(%)  Speed(RPM)
                  Direction
    1       1    Back-to-Front  60        13881
    1       2    Back-to-Front  60        12705
    2       1    Back-to-Front  60        8463
    2       2    Back-to-Front  60        8477
    3       1    Back-to-Front  60        8477
    3       2    Back-to-Front  60        8450
    4       1    Back-to-Front  60        8385
    4       2    Back-to-Front  60        8626
    Power Supply:
    Module  Airflow        Configured
             Direction      Speed (%)
    1       Back-to-Front  100
    2       Back-to-Front  100
    Temperature
    Module   Sensor     MajorThresh   MinorThres   CurTemp     Status
                         (Celsius)     (Celsius)    (Celsius)
    1        Outlet     65            55           36          ok
    1        PS-1       63            60           30          ok
    1        PS-2       63            60           31          ok
    Please let me know what can be done. Is that speed within acceptable limit.
    Thanks
    Nachi

    Usually this error message means that your have fan tray fault.
    Is the same fan tray working fine on the other nexus?
    Can you try reseating it again? Once you done provide me the following outputs:
    show env fan
    show en power in
    show logging last 100
    Regards
    Inayath

  • Higher Idle CPU Temps with Newest BIOS update for T430s/T430

    My idle temperatures of my CPU as reported by TPFC .62 before the UEFI Bios update were hovering around low 40's to high 40's. Now after the UEFI BIOS update the Idle temps as reported by TPFC .62 is a lot higher. It idles anywhere between 47 to high 55's. I noticed this immediately I updated the BIOS. Anyone else notice this???
    Please fix Lenovo

    Hi goshem
    If you try to do a stress test with Prime95, will it exceed 90C? 
    Peter  
    W520 (4284-A99)
    Does someone’s post help you? Give them kudos as a reward, as they will do better to improve | Mark it as solved if the solution works for you, so it could be reference for others in the future | Please do not email me regarding technical problems, you could post it in the forum
    =====================================
    Sound Enhancement (Post comments, share mixes, etc.)
    Dolby Home Theater v4 ; IdeaPad Slate Tablet

  • High MySQL CPU Load

    Hello All,
    I am currently running the following:
    OS X Server 10.5.5
    2x3GHz Multi-Core Xserve
    8GBs RAM
    MySQL Server v5.0.67
    One problem I am having is that when someone does a MySQL database search on a particular webpage the CPU load can get upwards to 400% render the search useless to all other clients. The MySQL CPU load is getting so high that no one can then do a search and the results never come back until the other queries are finished first.
    Why won't MySQL use the 8GBs of memory I have installed instead of sucking up CPU? Is there a way to allocate this in the OS or terminal? If not, should I be optimizing MySQL settings instead to better work with my query statement and 8GBs of memory that I have installed? I'm not exactly sure what to adjust within the MySQL settings if this is the case.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated!
    Thank you very much!

    @Camelot,
    I have not configured anything, everything is default install. I have about 6 devs on this box at all times and we do not have a MySQL admin. I really need to fine tune this setup as the DBs are starting to grow very big. I am looking for any help at this point and want to start fixing this now before it becomes more of a problem. I am going to start researching the MySQL dev zone ASAP.
    @Mabel
    Here is the output of MySQLtuner:
    *Maybe I need Snow Leopard to utilize all 8GBs of RAM??*
    -------- General Statistics --------------------------------------------------
    [--] Skipped version check for MySQLTuner script
    [OK] Currently running supported MySQL version 5.0.67-log
    [!!] Switch to 64-bit OS - MySQL cannot currently use all of your RAM
    -------- Storage Engine Statistics -------------------------------------------
    [--] Status: -Archive -BDB -Federated +InnoDB -ISAM -NDBCluster
    [--] Data in MyISAM tables: 5M (Tables: 16)
    [--] Data in InnoDB tables: 138M (Tables: 51)
    [OK] Total fragmented tables: 0
    -------- Performance Metrics -------------------------------------------------
    [--] Up for: 99d 16h 39m 42s (53K q [0.006 qps], 1K conn, TX: 17B, RX: 2M)
    [--] Reads / Writes: 99% / 1%
    [--] Total buffers: 442.0M global + 12.4M per thread (100 max threads)
    [OK] Maximum possible memory usage: 1.6G (41% of installed RAM)
    [OK] Slow queries: 0% (0/53K)
    [OK] Highest usage of available connections: 8% (8/100)
    [OK] Key buffer size / total MyISAM indexes: 384.0M/123.9M
    [OK] Key buffer hit rate: 99.8% (10K cached / 18 reads)
    [!!] Query cache efficiency: 0.8% (52 cached / 6K selects)
    [OK] Query cache prunes per day: 0
    [!!] Sorts requiring temporary tables: 11% (5 temp sorts / 44 sorts)
    [!!] Temporary tables created on disk: 38% (11K on disk / 29K total)
    [OK] Thread cache hit rate: 99% (8 created / 1K connections)
    [OK] Table cache hit rate: 91% (76 open / 83 opened)
    [OK] Open file limit used: 7% (86/1K)
    [OK] Table locks acquired immediately: 100% (10K immediate / 10K locks)
    [!!] InnoDB data size / buffer pool: 138.2M/8.0M
    -------- Recommendations -----------------------------------------------------
    General recommendations:
    Enable the slow query log to troubleshoot bad queries
    When making adjustments, make tmptable_size/max_heap_tablesize equal
    Reduce your SELECT DISTINCT queries without LIMIT clauses
    Variables to adjust:
    querycachelimit (> 1M, or use smaller result sets)
    sortbuffersize (> 2M)
    readrnd_buffersize (> 8M)
    tmptablesize (> 32M)
    maxheap_tablesize (> 16M)
    innodbbuffer_poolsize (>= 138M)
    Should I just go with these adjustments for now or do you guys recommend anything else?
    Thank you very very much guys!!!
    Message was edited by: spraguga

Maybe you are looking for

  • Default Excel in place for cl_gui_alv_grid, no headers

    I am calling method set_table_for_first_display in cl_gui_alv_grid. In the layout structure I have no_headers = 'X'.  In the Grid view, there is no default header - it is hidden. When switching to Excel in place, the headers appear at the top shaded

  • Help centering picture in a box using CSS

    I have a picture as background in the layer.. but i'm trying center the picture with box together whenever user resize or change their display example, if user change from their display from 1024 x 768 to some wide screen display it is still center o

  • Fund center derivation based on functional location cost center

    Hi, can anybody share the process to derive fund center based on cost center assigned to functional location/equipment of a plant maintenance order Thanks

  • Looping prob

    hi experts, i ve 2 internal tables: 1.it_main(contain all po no, and its details) 2. it_ekbe, (i fil this table for all entries in it_main, where ekbe-ebeln = it_main-ebeln, bewtp = 'e') i ve to fetch multiple grn no w.r.t. a single po no. first li i

  • How do I uninstall Windows 7 and undo my partition?

    How do I uninstall Windows 7 and undo my partition? I don't use Windows 7 anymore and would like the space back.