Nexus1000v - ? communication issue vcenter - N1Kv ???

Unregulary we get these kind of alarms in our vcenter although there were no changes made on nexus or VM side.:
"vSphere HA detected that host HOSTNAME is in a different network partition than the master MASTERNAME"
They are cleared after a certain time without any manual action.VMware assumes a communication issue between vcenter and nexus1000.
Anyone with similar experiences (or even a solution)???

Hi Sachin,
Thanks for your response.
Please find my reply below:
Is the module showing as up in the VSM when you execute 'show module'?
>Yes the module is up and showing active when i execute the given command
Is you ESX management VLAN allowed on the access port profile and on the uplink? Is it created on the switch?
>Yes it is created on the vswitch as well as the upstream switches and allowed in the link also.
Do you have system VLANs for your control, packet connectivity? For your ESX mgmt connectivity?
> Yes i had defined control, packet and management vlans as system vlans.
I feel that the port profile is not allowing the traffic to go in and out from the DVS.
When i change the uplink of VSM from vswitch to DVS then the VSM doesnt reach gateway itself.
Thanks,

Similar Messages

FIX: FireWire communication issue solved - What worked for me

After installing the iPod Updater 2006-01-10, I found that my FireWire devices (not just my iPod) no longer worked. After much messing about with all the suggestions I found online (none of which worked) I've managed to sort out the FireWire communication issues I had.
you can read about the exact issues I had here:
http://forums.kustompcs.co.uk/showthread.php?t=35034
and here:
http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=1562072
Unfortunately those looking for a quick fix will be disappointed, I had to:
a) Send my iPod Mini back to Apple, which was promptly replaced
b) Totally re-install Windows (including drive format)
c) Borrow the install CD that came with my friends iPod, which had a later version of iPod Updater (2005-10-12) than the one I had on my install CD, but earlier than the dreaded 2006-01-10
If anyone needs this updater (as it's impossible to find an earlier one on Apple's website) drop me your email in here and I'll send you the web address to download it. This is basically a ZIP of the original CD, totally virus free (for those that are worried) and appears to work fine.
If Apple have an issue with this, then why don't you fix the link on your site to this updater; this is simply my response to the complete lack of response from Apple on this matter.
A quick note about the: 'connection rate=S100 ERROR'.
If you discover you have this error when you test your iPod in diagnostic mode; find out how to do this here:
http://www.methodshop.com/mp3/ipodsupport/diagnosticmode/index.shtml
Then it appears there is nothing you can do to fix this other than sending it back to Apple. No amount of restoring will solve it.
I hope this helps someone out there! I've yet to fix the issue with my LaCie drive (basically it needs sending back) which if anything proves that whatever screwed my system did something to the hardware on a low level, it wasn't a Windows software issue, because after re-installing it, I download SP2 and ALL the latest hotfixes, if that was the cause, it would have done it again.
This leaves one culprit - the iPod Updater 2006-01-10, as this was the only software I installed at the time both of my FireWire devices went down, avoid it like the plaque.
Regards
Matt

After installing the iPod Updater 2006-01-10, I found that my FireWire devices (not just my iPod) no longer worked. After much messing about with all the suggestions I found online (none of which worked) I've managed to sort out the FireWire communication issues I had.
you can read about the exact issues I had here:
http://forums.kustompcs.co.uk/showthread.php?t=35034
and here:
http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=1562072
Unfortunately those looking for a quick fix will be disappointed, I had to:
a) Send my iPod Mini back to Apple, which was promptly replaced
b) Totally re-install Windows (including drive format)
c) Borrow the install CD that came with my friends iPod, which had a later version of iPod Updater (2005-10-12) than the one I had on my install CD, but earlier than the dreaded 2006-01-10
If anyone needs this updater (as it's impossible to find an earlier one on Apple's website) drop me your email in here and I'll send you the web address to download it. This is basically a ZIP of the original CD, totally virus free (for those that are worried) and appears to work fine.
If Apple have an issue with this, then why don't you fix the link on your site to this updater; this is simply my response to the complete lack of response from Apple on this matter.
A quick note about the: 'connection rate=S100 ERROR'.
If you discover you have this error when you test your iPod in diagnostic mode; find out how to do this here:
http://www.methodshop.com/mp3/ipodsupport/diagnosticmode/index.shtml
Then it appears there is nothing you can do to fix this other than sending it back to Apple. No amount of restoring will solve it.
I hope this helps someone out there! I've yet to fix the issue with my LaCie drive (basically it needs sending back) which if anything proves that whatever screwed my system did something to the hardware on a low level, it wasn't a Windows software issue, because after re-installing it, I download SP2 and ALL the latest hotfixes, if that was the cause, it would have done it again.
This leaves one culprit - the iPod Updater 2006-01-10, as this was the only software I installed at the time both of my FireWire devices went down, avoid it like the plaque.
Regards
Matt

Any fix for the PC based network printer communication issue with Mavericks?

Any fix for the PC based network printer communication issue with Mavericks?

I just signed up for FIOS and am not experiencing your problem (had enough other ones instead).
Go to mail preferences ~ click on a mail account ~ click on the advanced tab. The only settings that worked for me were: port 110 SSL OFF, authentication: Authenticated POP (APOP). If I remember correctly when I first set this up another window opened and I typed in my password and never had to do that again.
Hope this helps.

Ethernet Communications Issue

Hello list,
I have an ethernet communications issue.
We can communicate with our products using two communications modes, ethernet, and a proprietary CAN. For the ethernet connection, I have a router that assigns a DHCP address to the product (169.254.130.005). For the CAN connection there is a hardware ethernet to CAN adapter that has an assigned address of 169.254.130.006.
Below is a simplified example of the code I use to talk to the product. (there is only one loop...two loops are shown. One showing the True Cases, one showing the False cases.
So I set the I.P. address, set "Connect?" to true, and run my code for a while. I then set "Connect?" to false, change the I.P. address, and then set "Connect?" to true.
What I have found is that the "TCP Close Connection" does not actually close the connection, and the "TCP Read" and "TCP Write" are reading and writing to BOTH I.P. addresses simultaneously! (confirmed by using Wireshark). I don't understand how this can be since I only have one TCP Write and one TCP Write, and see only one "Connection I.D." when I probe that wire.
Am I not closing the connection properly? Do I have to kill the connection ID in Windows somehow?
Any ideas would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Mike
Using Labview 8.2
Windows XP
Attachments:
Ethernet Issue.JPG ‏274 KB

Nathand,
The code shown is a simple representation of what I'm doing. I guess it wasn't clear. The switch is connected to a shift register to compare the previous & current loops itterations and only opens one connection "on change" of the "Connected?" input. (that is confirmed with Wireshark). Also, the product tells me that I have made only one TCP/IP connection on each IP address.
I pass the Connecion ID that is created out the right side of the loop and into the left with a shift register when the connectionis made...so the same Connection ID is used for each read/write. What I'm not understanding is how I can see only one Connection ID on the wire but a read/write to both I.P. addresses with only one one read and one write in my code.
Any other ideas would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Mike

Xi3 companion box communication issues with X1 platform

Hopefully someone has had this issue as I haven't been able to find this one during my search.   Subject: Xi3 set top boxes will not connect to the X1 platform on the same outlet(s) that my RNG150 will.   Background: 4 weeks ago a very polite gentleman working with an Xfinity subcontractor arrived at 8am to install our Xfinity package and equipment. 8 hours later he finally left. During that time, there were multiple connectivity issues with the small Xi3 set top boxes. The X1 platform (DVR) and modem were easily set up and tested and worked perfectly (and still do) at the main location in our great room, however, when it came time to connect the other 3 rooms (all located upstairs), there were communication issues. As my wife set up services with Xfinity, she didn't realize we needed these extra set top boxes, so the technitian had to call and add them and only had (2) of the "new" Xi3 boxes, but had an "older" RNG150 set top box in his vehicle so we had him install that one as we didn't mind the older larger box in the rec room. After multiple calls to trouble shoot why these two boxes weren't communicating, he apparently resolved the issue, tested the boxes and we signed off and he left. That evening I went to turn on the bedroom tv and nothing but the red screen of death. Error code RDK 03030. So, I followed the troubleshooting guildlines, rebooting the platform in sequence, several times to make sure I got it right. Still red screen. I checked the other Xi3 box, same issue. Since the rec room tv was still working, I just jacked that box and moved it to our bedroom. BOOM. Full functionality. Only problem was the inability to access our saved programs. So, i've been doing this for the last 4 months. Moving the box from our room to the rec room for our little one to watch cartoons, then back to our room at night. Suffice it to say, my wife is growing tired of this so I put a call into the technician as he wanted to make sure I call him first so the install doesn't look negative on his record. No response. I've been researching this for the last week and have come to the following conclusions. - Possible wire/coax issue.This seemed the most plausible, however, I was able to confirm we have the COMMSCOPE Amp installed and the line to the X1 platform does in fact work based on the fact the older box works on the same line, so if it is some sort of wiring issue its lost at the Xi3 box or perhaps the older box requires a weaker signal to perform? I've also seen many comments suggesting the COMMSCOPE amps are garbage. Thats fine, but if it worked previously, and the older box works, would that still be the culprit?
- Moca issue.I'm not entirely sure how this works, but when checking diagnostics, the grid shows 0's across the matrix. Even with the older box active. I'm at work currently so I cannot post the rest of the diagnostics, can provide that once I get home.- Hardware issue. Even though these boxes worked when the technician installed and tested them, perhaps there is a hardware failure or these boxes are "bad".   Hopefully someone on here can help, I'd prefer not to have to contact customer service, follow all the trouble shooting steps I've perfomed ad nauseum and have a tech come out if possible. However, if it has to happen then so be it. Thanks for your help in advance.

Hopefully someone has had this issue as I haven't been able to find this one during my search.   Subject: Xi3 set top boxes will not connect to the X1 platform on the same outlet(s) that my RNG150 will.   Background: 4 weeks ago a very polite gentleman working with an Xfinity subcontractor arrived at 8am to install our Xfinity package and equipment. 8 hours later he finally left. During that time, there were multiple connectivity issues with the small Xi3 set top boxes. The X1 platform (DVR) and modem were easily set up and tested and worked perfectly (and still do) at the main location in our great room, however, when it came time to connect the other 3 rooms (all located upstairs), there were communication issues. As my wife set up services with Xfinity, she didn't realize we needed these extra set top boxes, so the technitian had to call and add them and only had (2) of the "new" Xi3 boxes, but had an "older" RNG150 set top box in his vehicle so we had him install that one as we didn't mind the older larger box in the rec room. After multiple calls to trouble shoot why these two boxes weren't communicating, he apparently resolved the issue, tested the boxes and we signed off and he left. That evening I went to turn on the bedroom tv and nothing but the red screen of death. Error code RDK 03030. So, I followed the troubleshooting guildlines, rebooting the platform in sequence, several times to make sure I got it right. Still red screen. I checked the other Xi3 box, same issue. Since the rec room tv was still working, I just jacked that box and moved it to our bedroom. BOOM. Full functionality. Only problem was the inability to access our saved programs. So, i've been doing this for the last 4 months. Moving the box from our room to the rec room for our little one to watch cartoons, then back to our room at night. Suffice it to say, my wife is growing tired of this so I put a call into the technician as he wanted to make sure I call him first so the install doesn't look negative on his record. No response. I've been researching this for the last week and have come to the following conclusions. - Possible wire/coax issue.This seemed the most plausible, however, I was able to confirm we have the COMMSCOPE Amp installed and the line to the X1 platform does in fact work based on the fact the older box works on the same line, so if it is some sort of wiring issue its lost at the Xi3 box or perhaps the older box requires a weaker signal to perform? I've also seen many comments suggesting the COMMSCOPE amps are garbage. Thats fine, but if it worked previously, and the older box works, would that still be the culprit?
- Moca issue.I'm not entirely sure how this works, but when checking diagnostics, the grid shows 0's across the matrix. Even with the older box active. I'm at work currently so I cannot post the rest of the diagnostics, can provide that once I get home.- Hardware issue. Even though these boxes worked when the technician installed and tested them, perhaps there is a hardware failure or these boxes are "bad".   Hopefully someone on here can help, I'd prefer not to have to contact customer service, follow all the trouble shooting steps I've perfomed ad nauseum and have a tech come out if possible. However, if it has to happen then so be it. Thanks for your help in advance.

About the communication issues in the client-server program

About the communication issues in the client-server program
Hi, I have some questions about the communication issues in a java project, which is basically the client and server architecture. In brief, the client, written in java, can be deployed anywhere, and in the following part, assume it is in the LAN (Local Area Network) which is connnected to the internet through the firewall and/or proxy, and the server, written in
java too, simply provides the listening service on a port in a remote machine. And assume the server is connected to the internet directly so that the scenario can be simple to focus on the core questions.
My questions are as follows:
1 About the relationship between the communication port and protocol
Generally, protocols at the application level like HTTP, FTP have their own default port, e.g., HTTP is corresponding to 80,
FTP is to 25. But it is NOT necessary for the web server to provide the HTTP listening service at port 80, right? E.g, Tomcat provides the HTTP listening service at 8080. So it means the default relationship between the application protocl and their port is some routine, which is not necessary to follow, right?
2 Assume a LAN connected to the internet through a proxy, which only allows HTTP protocol, then questions are:
2.1 Does the proxy recognize the HTTP request from the client by the port number (carried in the request string)? For example, when the server provides the HTTP listening service at 80, then the request from the client will include the port number 80, then the proxy will parse such info and decide if or not the request can be out.
2.2 Does the proxy recognize the HTTP request from the client by protocol (carried in the request string)? For example, the protocol used in the communicatin should be included in the request, then the proxy can parse it to make the decision.
3 In java programm, if using the HTTP protcol, then on the client: the corresponding API is java.net.URLConnection, right?
If using the TCP protocol directly, then on the client:the corresponding API is java.net.Socket, right? In both cases, the server side use the same API, java.net.ServerSocket?
Is it correct to say that the communication by Socket is faster than URLConnection?
4 Take MSN messenger for example, which protocol does it use? Since proxy configure is only the possible option, so I guess generally the TCP protocol is used directly so that the better perfomrance can be achieved, right?
5 Given 3 computers within the same LAN, can the client, proxy, server environment above be correctly simulated? If so, can
you recommend me some typical proxy program so that I can install it to configure such an enviroment to perform some test?
6 I guess there should be some software to find out which port number a given program/process is going through to connect to
the remote machine, and which port number a given program/process is listening on? Also, what protocl is used in the given
communication.
7 Finally, regarding each of the above questions, it will be highly appreciated that if you can recommed some references,
tutorials, books etc. In summary, what I care about is how to enable the java client behind the proxy and firewall to
communicate with the remote server without problems, so if you know some good tutorials plz let me know and thx in advance!
Finally, thanks for your attention so such long questions =).

FTP is to 25. But it is NOT necessary for the web
server to provide the HTTP listening service at port
80, right? E.g, Tomcat provides the HTTP listening
service at 8080. So it means the default relationship
between the application protocl and their port is
some routine, which is not necessary to follow,
right?Not sure what you're saying here.
There must be a server listening on some port. The client must know what port that is. If you open the connection using the Socket class, you'll explicitly specify the port. If you use some higher level class like URLConnection or something in the commons Net package, there's probably a default port that will be used if you don't explicitly specify another.
There's no way for the client to know that the HTTP request will go to port 80 instead of port 8080. If you think the the client contacts the server without explicitly naming a port, and then asks the server "get me your HTTP server", and the port is determined from that, you're mistaken.
Not sure if you're thinking that, but it sounded like you might be.
2 Assume a LAN connected to the internet through
a proxy, which only allows HTTP protocol, then
questions are:
2.1 Does the proxy recognize the HTTP request
from the client by the port number (carried in the
request string)? For example, when the server
provides the HTTP listening service at 80, then the
request from the client will include the port number
80, then the proxy will parse such info and decide if
or not the request can be out. I'm not sure, but I think most proxies and firewalls are configured by ports. I thought I'd heard of more sophisticated, higher-level ones that could understand the content to some degree, but I don't know anything about those.
3 In java programm, if using the HTTP protcol,
then on the client: the corresponding API is
java.net.URLConnection, right?That's one way.
You might want to look into this:
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/httpclient/
If using the TCP protocol directly, then on the
client:the corresponding API is java.net.Socket,
right? In both cases, the server side use the same
API, java.net.ServerSocket? A Java client will user Socket, and a Java server will use ServerSocket and Socket.
Is it correct to say that the communication by Socket
is faster than URLConnection?Probably not.

Communication issues between domain controllers

Hi everyone,
I am experiencing some problems in communication between domain controllers in our organization
We have three domain controllers, one of them is a Windows 2003 server service pack 2 which is physical (controller A), another which is Windows 2008 Service Pack 2 (controller B), also physical, and a third one (controller C) which is a Windows 2008
service pack 1 and is virtual.
I have problems with this last DC, it won't respond to pings, or DNS query. I can't Access it by remote desktop client even when it is enabled. I cannot update it, it prompts error messages if I try to do so.
This problems are solved if I reboot it, it will work fine some hours or days, but not much longer. I have checked event viewer and I didn't found any message about this.
I read some time ago it would be great to have a DC in a virtual machine, so I did it, but is it right?
Do you know what might be going on with it? would depromoting it and seting it up again the best solución?
Thank you very much.
Best regards.
David.

This sounds like a NIC issue, which is odd since it is a virtual machine. Have you checked the host for any logs about the client?
I think the first thing I would do is destroy the current virtual NIC card and add a new one. Since this has nothing to do with Active Directory I would also suggest you post this in a forum of for the Host (VMWare or Hyper-V).
Paul Bergson
MVP - Directory Services
MCITP: Enterprise Administrator
MCTS, MCT, MCSE, MCSA, Security, BS CSci
2012, 2008, Vista, 2003, 2000 (Early Achiever), NT4
Twitter @pbbergs http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/paulbergson
Please no e-mails, any questions should be posted in the NewsGroup.
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.

Communication issue btw applications on SAP J2EE Engine6.20 & Websphere 6.0

We have a customized SAP IPC application running on SAP J2EE Engine 6.20 and it is communicating with another application called Common Configurator or C2 running on WebSphere 4.0.5.
Communication between customized SAP IPC application and C2 application is over RMI IIOP. SAP IPC application calls methods on stateless session beans in C2 application.
Going forward, we want to connect to C2 running on Websphere 6.0 from this customized SAP IPC.
When I am trying to connect to C2 on Websphere 6.0 I am getting the following
exception :
org.omg.CORBA.BAD_PARAM:   minor code: 0 completed: No
     at org.omg.CosNaming.NamingContextHelper.narrow(NamingContextHelper.java:48)
     at com.sun.jndi.cosnaming.CNCtx.setOrbAndRootContext(CNCtx.java:278)
     at com.sun.jndi.cosnaming.CNCtx.initUsingUrl(CNCtx.java:251)
     at com.sun.jndi.cosnaming.CNCtx.initOrbAndRootContext(CNCtx.java:188)
     at com.sun.jndi.cosnaming.CNCtx.<init>(CNCtx.java:68)
     at com.sun.jndi.cosnaming.CNCtxFactory.getInitialContext(CNCtxFactory.java:30)
     at javax.naming.spi.NamingManager.getInitialContext(NamingManager.java:660)
     at javax.naming.InitialContext.getDefaultInitCtx(InitialContext.java:241)
     at javax.naming.InitialContext.init(InitialContext.java:217)
     at javax.naming.InitialContext.<init>(InitialContext.java:193)
But the same setup is working fine for SAP J2EE Engine 6.20 and Websphere 4.0.5.
Has anybody faced similar issue before ?
Could anyone tell me what could be the possible reasons and how can I preceed on this.
Additionally,
SAP J2EE Engine 6.20 uses ORB implementation of the Sun JDK (1.3). And Websphere 6.0 is based on JDK 1.4 version.
Thanks in advance.
Harman

This is what class org.omg.CORBA.BAD_PARAM all about :
<i>Exception thrown when a parameter passed to a call is out of range or otherwise considered illegal. An ORB may raise this exception if null values or null pointers are passed to an operation (for language mappings where the concept of a null pointers or null values applies). BAD_PARAM can also be raised as a result of a client generating requests with incorrect parameters using the DII.
It contains a minor code, which gives more detailed information about what caused the exception, and a completion status. It may also contain a string describing the exception.</i>
<b>And Websphere 6.0 is based on JDK 1.4 version.</b> The JDK of websphere is an IBM implementation and differs a lot from the sun implementation. As well, WAS6.0 supports J2EE 1.4 also...may be you should check the release notes / documentation of WAS for compatibility issues if any.
Regards,
Amol

Cisco Catalyst Supervisor communication issue?

Hey all,
I had a slight issue regarding two supervisor engines on a Cisco Catalyst 4500 device where the keepalives between the two sups lost communication for roughly 50~ seconds. This triggered an SNMP alert but it looks like they regained connectivity before a switchover was initiated. Has anyone ever experienced anything like this before?

You obviously need to configure the ports etc. but the switch should recognise the module as long as you have an IOS that supports it.
There is nothing extra to do, you just slot the module in.
If you are connecting all your distribution switches to the 6500 then if you don't need a vlan/IP subnet in multiple buildings then you should use L3 connections to the 6500.
Note also that you may want to consider at some time in the future a second supervisor or another chassis as this 6500 with one supervisor is a single point of failure ie. if it goes then there is no communication between buildings.
Jon

2253iX California Power Supply USB Communication Issue FIXED

I figure I would post this in the event someone else runs into the same issue.
When trying to communicate to an 2253iX California three phase power supply through USB using labVIEW, it would always fail in the initalization block, when asking the unit for the model ( *IDN? ). The display on the instrument would display Error -113 "Undefined Header" Turns out the USB Com port driver doesn't work when registered as COM9 or greater. It has to be COM0 through COM8. Uninstalling a device in that range and reassigning the power supply's COM fixed the issue.

not surprising...
I have been using California Instruments 5001iX AC source and 3091LD AC load for years and communications (RS-322, GPIB, USB) have always been hit and miss when answering an *IDN? query.
Even the newer series 2 models have these issues, but seemingly only with *IDN? query.
I just put a loop in to query it several times before giving up.
Also I have found Ci's set of IVI vi's are usless crap and have made my own using SCPI that work a lot better.
What really makes me sad is Ci is still far superior than Elgar when it comes to AC power sources.

Field Point FP-1000 communication issue - Device found but offline in MAX

Hello,
I am trying to control several field point PLCs in a level tank. They are communicating through a FP-1000 module. I am able to add the devices through a configuration file in MAX. But there is an error saying " The device is offline. Make sure the device is connected and its power is on. " All of the field point PLCs have green light on for both " Power" and "Ready". I am not sure what the issue is here. I am using Labview 2014 and Field Point , VISA drivers are installed. Please see attached pictures for details.
Many Thanks
FLiu
Attachments:
IMG_1359.JPG ‏4812 KB
IMG_1360.jpg ‏2220 KB
IMG_1361.jpg ‏2251 KB

Thanks for your reply. I installed the most updated version for both ones. It turns out the configuration file for FP-1000 bank points to the wrong COM port for the Serial communication. I am able to communicate with the system now. I do have another problem through. I only have excutable labview files and a configuration file for the control system that I am working with. The original VI project file were lost. After importing the right configuration file in MAX, I installed the excutables and tried to run it. There is no response at all.The labview only last a few seconds and stopped. Any thoughts are greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Fliu

Interportlet Communication Issue - Help!!

We are in the process of converting our site to 8.1 and have bumped into a problem
with the interportlet communication. We have two portlets on a page that need
to listen to each other (a Shopping Cart portlet and a Shopping Content portlet).
We have specified on each portlet that it listen to the other and while that
does fire the corresponding action on both portlets, it always fires portlet A
before portlet B, even when we take an action on portlet B.
It seems strange to me that in a listening portlet situation, it will always fire
one before the other, regardless of where the action was taken.
Any help that can be provided would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks.

Hi Paul,
I had issues with the inter-portlet communication also. From my understanding
both portlets are listening to the same outer request. For example in the begin
action method of Portlet_2 I have:
HttpServletRequest outerrequest = ScopedServletUtils.getOuterRequest(getRequest());
String param1 = outerrequest.getParameter("param1");
if (param1.equals("some_value"))
// do something
In the JSP of my portlet_1 I have the following:
<% HttpServletRequest outerrequest =
ScopedServletUtils.getOuterRequest(request);
String actionURLB = outerrequest.getRequestURI() + "?";
%>
<a href="<%=actionURLB%>param1=1 ">Do First</a>
<a href="<%=actionURLB%>param1=2 ">Do Second</a>
I don't have the Portlet_1 listening to the outer request. You may want to also
look at the example in the examples provided from BEA which kind of helped me.
However, I had problems incorporating their code that they provided even though
they work well in the BEA examples.
Mansoor
"Paul Merrigan" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
We are in the process of converting our site to 8.1 and have bumped into
a problem
with the interportlet communication. We have two portlets on a page
that need
to listen to each other (a Shopping Cart portlet and a Shopping Content
portlet).
We have specified on each portlet that it listen to the other and while
that
does fire the corresponding action on both portlets, it always fires
portlet A
before portlet B, even when we take an action on portlet B.
It seems strange to me that in a listening portlet situation, it will
always fire
one before the other, regardless of where the action was taken.
Any help that can be provided would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks.

Communication Issue

Groupwise 8 on SLES 11 SP3
NDSMP on SLES 11 SP2
LDAP server Netware 6.5 SP8
I recently completed a move of Groupwise from my Netware 6.5 SP8 server to SLES. Today I rebooted the server that Groupwise used to be on, its our main file server and is still our LDAP server. After it came back up Blackberry users started telling me that they were getting an Alert on their phones about incorrect login information. Re-entering their password did not fix it for anybody.
I started looking at logs and dstraces, suspecting LDAP issues or SSL (SSL I had disabled after the GW move). Another symptom that occurred was I could not login to WebAccess either (although I am not certain that this started occurring after the main server reboot). The logs for Webaccess simply showed Login Failed, even with verbose logging enabled. I rebooted the NDSMP server as well but this did not solve anything. I set dstrace to watch LDAp activity on the LDAP server but it never showed anything.
Then I started checking the poa logs. While I was browsing through it for errors I saw a SOAP connection come in from the NDSMP server.
Webaccess started working again as did everyone's Blackberries and iPhones. I don't believe that I did anything that would have solved the problem. I would like to know what the problem was so that the next time I need to reboot my server I can avoid this. Does anyone have any thoughts on what this might have been? Why the delay in communications between the NDSMP and Groupwise or the LDAP server?
Thanks,
Puzzled in Regina,
Scott

Groupwise 8 SP3 all agents on the same box
NDSMP 1.2.5 build 299
The outage lasted about 30 - 40 minutes. Yes users were active on the netware server while this was happening and there were no issues with local Groupwise clients.
There were Soap events listed in the POA log during the outage usually 2 sometimes 3 per user, all in a row. Excerpt from log included:
10:18:15 F39B SOAP command:[loginRequest] requested from 192.168.100.205 User session(user1)
10:18:15 F39B SOAP command:[logoutRequest] requested from 192.168.100.205 User session(user1)
10:18:15 F39B SOAP command:[loginRequest] requested from 192.168.100.205 User session(user1)
10:18:16 EFBF SOAP command:[loginRequest] requested from 192.168.100.205 User session(user2)
10:18:16 EFBF SOAP command:[loginRequest] requested from 192.168.100.205 User session(user3)
10:18:16 F47D SOAP command:[loginRequest] requested from 192.168.100.205 User session(user2)
10:18:16 F47D SOAP command:[loginRequest] requested from 192.168.100.205 User session(user3)
10:18:16 EFBF SOAP command:[loginRequest] requested from 192.168.100.205 User session(user4)
10:18:16 EFBF SOAP command:[loginRequest] requested from 192.168.100.205 User session(user4)
10:18:16 F39B SOAP command:[loginRequest] requested from 192.168.100.205 User session(user5)
and so on for all of the users. This seems to be typical behaviour though as I can see the same sort of thing through out the log not just during the outage.
I also noticed an error listed in the poa logs for an attempt I made to login to Webaccess during the outage.
10:21:32 F10F *** NEW APP CONNECTION, Tbl Entry=53, Check ID=1404770128
10:21:32 F10F C/S Login WebAccess ::GW Id=sschaffer :: 192.168.100.100 [192.168.100.155]
10:21:32 F10F Error: [0051] User:sschaffer (sschaffer)
10:21:32 F10F *** APP DISCONNECTED, Tbl Entry=53, Check ID=1404770128
And your final question, no unfortunately I don't have any switches that log network activity. Do you know of any logs on the NDSMP server that might show something?
Thanks,
Scott
This seems to point to an SSL certificate error (see http://www.novell.com/support/kb/doc.php?id=7009689) but I had disabled SSL on LDAP shortly after my Groupwise migration
>>> On July-23-14 at 3:33 PM, in message <[email protected]>, Andy Konecny<[email protected]> wrote:
In article <[email protected]>, Scott Schaffer wrote:
> Groupwise 8 on SLES 11 SP3
> NDSMP on SLES 11 SP2
>
Groupwise 8, version? Are all agents on the same box?
NDSMP? Data Synchronizer? version?
About how long would you say this outage ended up being? 30 minutes? An
hour or two?
Were users active against the NetWare box while this was happening? A
thought would be if it was maxed out or otherwise inaccessible would
cause some of the same behaviour. Did users with local GroupWise
clients open notice anything?
In the POA logs, was there any SOAP activity in the time frame the
restart of the NetWare box and the BBs actually working
Wondering if there was a networking issue at the time. Do you a switch
system that collects logs you could lookat?
Andy of
KonecnyConsulting.ca in Toronto
Knowledge Partner
http://forums.novell.com/member.php/75037-konecnya
If you find a post helpful and are logged in the Web interface, please
show your appreciation by clicking on the star below. Thanks!

Configure SSL enabled communication issue

Hi Experts,
I'm having this wierd issue.. Installed SharePoint like for the 10th time in my life or so. But this time when I was doing this "Configure SSL enabled communication" steps the Powershell window just hangs forever.
PS C:\FASTSearch\installer\scripts> .\SecureFASTSearchConnector.ps1 -certPath "C
:\FASTSearch\data\data_security\cert\FASTSearchCert.pfx" -ssaName "FAST Content"
-username "domain\user"
Enter the certificate password: **********
Installed certificate.
Updated acls on certificates private keys.
Nothing happens after that. It usually will say the below but it freezes for me.
Updated acls on certificates private keys.
Your FAST Search Connector has been setup to use certificate, restarting osearch14.
Connection to contentdistributor host:port successfully validated.
Until I restart the osearch14 manually from services. But after that the contentsource page is never opening up for me.
I'm I missing something obvious? Or I'm I facing some premission realted issues? nctrl status shwoings everything is running. Any pointers will help.
Thank you.
Freddie Maize ..A story with Glory is History. Doesn’t matter whether Glory rest in the world of Demon or God. Lets create History..

Thank you for your response.
Yes I have set the particular proerty SSLAlwaysNegoClientCert to True and it is able to establish the ssl conneciton without initiating renegotiation from IIS server side.The property has to be set the metabase.xml file.
Thank you very much once again.
Edited by: arpitak on Jun 23, 2010 2:10 AM

Using iPad in Support Community - Issues

How can I stay logged in longer on iPad? If I leave the Page inactive and use other pages, I often find that I have to sign in again. See below.
How can I quickly get back to the community page I was on when I sign in? I get taken to the home, where (almost) all the communities are listed. See below.
How can I make sure that the list of communities is not truncated? The last one I can see on the Overview page is the section on desktops, which only lists iMac and Mac Mini. Seems that the Mac Pro is hidden, and maybe more stuff as well.

Just found another issue. Tried to update my product info to reflect the RAM upgrade from 6GB to 8GB, and I removed the "6", but nothing happens when I type "8". Or anything else for that matter. The keyboard blinks, but there is no result.

Nexus1000v - ? communication issue vcenter - N1Kv ???

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for