Nfs_write_latency, how high is too high

statistics show-periodic -object volume -instance volume_name -counter nfs_write_latency I am running this command on volumes, and got different values, from 0 us to a few hundreds, How high it is too high, and then we could have performance issue.Anybody please let me know your measurement? Thanks!

Hi, I think this is a duplicate post which I replied to ( http://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-ONTAP-Discussions/nfs-write-latency-how-high-is-high/m-p/106871/highlight/false#M22005 ) Thanks

Similar Messages

  • Nfs_write_latency, how high is high

    statistics show-periodic -object volume -instance volume_name -counter nfs_write_latency I am running this command on volumes, and got different values, from 0 us to a few hundreds, How high it is too high, Anybody please let me know your measurement? Thanks!

    Hi, How high is too high: this depends on the application hosted on the particular nfs volume, and how much load is there from other volume on the controller.In your case, I see sub milli second write latency which is fairly good for NFS volumes.Values lesser than 5 ms is ideally good. Thanks

  • SAPehpi: glibc too high

    I have just finished installing "ERP 6 Enhancement package 5 on NW 702" (abap stack only).
    The OS is RHEL 6.
    The system runs on SAP Kernel 7.20 (not 7.20_EXT yet).
    The Software comonents are:
    SAP_ABA 702
    SAP_BASIS 702
    PI_BASIS 702
    SAP_APPL 605
    ... more 701, 702
    SAP_HR 600
    EA_HR 600
    ... more 600
    SAP got lazy and left many components at 600 level.
    I want SAP_HR, EA_HR at 605.
    I ran an Enhancement package MOPZ transaction to get the set of packages including SAP_HR 605 and EA_HR 605.
    I assumed since I ran an Enhancement type MOPZ transaction I needed to use SAP Enhancement package installer.
    There are only two (SAP Enhancement package installer 700 and 710 - no 701 or 702).
    The SAPehpi700  tool is warning me glibc 2.12-1 too high.
    Too high for what? SAPenpi?
    It's not too high for my kernel 7.20.  The PAM for this kernel lists OS RHEL 6 therefore all glibc versions in this distribution are good.
    (see note 1496410 for glibc specifications for RHEL6)
    Am I using the wrong tool?  Should I be using SPAM/SAINT?
    I'm not switching the SAP kernel at this time.
    Ken

    > The SAPehpi700  tool is warning me glibc 2.12-1 too high.
    You can ignore that warning. At the time the SAPehpi version 7.00 was created there was no RHEL 6 (or SLES 11 SP1) and hence the warning comes.
    Markus

  • Lion OS X 7.4 Security settings too high, how can i put back to original settings?

    I've been away at university all year and i've found that whatever security settings they've adjusted to use the college system, its put them up too high for things like iplayer and sky go. Iplayer streams but exceedingly slowly and eventually just stops and I think the security settings has stopped this. Skygo doesn't sign in on any of my browsers (mozilla, google chrome and safari, previously it had worked for firefox and chrome, now none of them work) and I have no idea how to fix this. If I could put the security settings back to their original form then I could then see if it was a security problem.

    I've been away at university all year and i've found that whatever security settings they've adjusted to use the college system, its put them up too high for things like iplayer and sky go. Iplayer streams but exceedingly slowly and eventually just stops and I think the security settings has stopped this. Skygo doesn't sign in on any of my browsers (mozilla, google chrome and safari, previously it had worked for firefox and chrome, now none of them work) and I have no idea how to fix this. If I could put the security settings back to their original form then I could then see if it was a security problem.

  • Firmware version is too high. How uninstall? Correct version where?

    Help! That Firmware thing is driving me nuts. Wish apple would organize the latest upgrades by OS. It’s a maze.
    My iMac DV (blue front slot loading) is OS 9.0.4 (I will upgrade but not right now, too long to explain).
    I had bought a LaCie HD some years ago & made partition with OS 9.0.4, 9.1 to 9.2, it fell, bought another and installed it.
    After much time I found out that to know my version of Firmware I have to look for boot ROM, my system profiler says it’s $0004.19f1 that means probably v 4.19.
    If it’s v 4.1.9 it is too high it needs OS 9.1 and probably happened with I had OS 9.1 on my external HD. My LaCie CD Writer became a nightmare and I don’t dare to use it anymore, maybe it was because of the firmware ….or it might be that Apple CD/DVD Driver can’t exist at the same time as Toast extensions, it’s unclear to me.
    Can’t find the latest firmware version for OS 9.0.4 that will work, or how I can take it off before I install another one. I know v2.4 will work on OS 9.0.4.
    Got: Firewire v2.3.3 - usb v 1.4.2 - CarbonLib v 1.6 - Apple CD/DVD Driver v 1.3.5 player is v2.1
    Help!
    1. What’s the latest Firmware for OS 9.0.4?
    2. Do I have Firmware v 4.1.9?
    3. How do I uninstall Firmware v 4.1.9?
    4. CAN Apple CD/DVD Driver exist at the same time as Toast extensions?
    Thanks very much
    Nicky

    I think that you misunderstood Kappy's point about Mac OS X version.
    What the information about OS X version is telling you is that those are the minimum requirements for the installer which places the firmware update permanently in the ROM on the logic board to run. However, once the firmware has been installed you are free to continue to update your version of Mac OS X for as long as Apple releases them.
    I have an iMac G3 DV+ which has ROM version 4.1.9f1 and is running Mac OS X 10.4.8.
    However, the firmware is backwards compatible as well. You obviously installed the firmware when you were running OS 9.1, but at some time regressed your OS to 9.0.4.
    I think the issues that you are experiencing are related to other issues on your Mac. The folks in the iMac G3 forum should be able to help you sort that out.

  • Too High Bit rate error no matter how much reduce it

    After Exporting an HDV 1080i 16:9 3 sequences from FCP via
    compressor at Best SD DVD 90 minutes, 16:9, and burning two DVD-Rs that work, now DVDSP keeps giving me Video Bit Rate too high error and stops building shortly after starts. And no matter how much I lower bit rate won't do it! HELP

    I think - and see if you agree - that I exported using a compressor bit rate setting of 6.0 and max of 7.5 on the first 56 min sucessful sequence build/burn, and then thought I could go higher on the second export so goosed the max bit rate to 9.0 since there were occassional big bits of motion. So now on the other two sequences DVD SP won't adjust that previous compression rate, and instead I will have to sacrifice the audio quality (use Dolby only)
    to get it to build. I certainly DON't want to wait 26 to 28 hours again for each sequence to export!! Does that sound right?

  • Mic level too high when recorded, how to fix?

    I have an interview where the mic level has been too high when recorded.
    The sound is basically usable, it's not all rubbish, but how to fix this?
    I know there are tools for this, just don't know what they are.
    Thanks for helping.

    If the audio is clipped there's not much you can do other than re-record. But there is this: http://www.izotope.com/products/audio/RX/
    -DH

  • I have a macbook pro OS 10.5.8. I've sync'ed it with an iPad 2. I would like to access the "cloud" but it seems my Leopard isn't sufficient. How high an OS upgrade would i need to use cloud? Most of my current apps wouldn't work with a too high upgrade.

    I have a macbook pro OS leopard 10.5.8. I've synced it with an iPad 2. I cannot access the cloud because my OS is insufficient. Problem is most of my most- used applications would not work with a too-high system upgrade. I can't afford to upgrade all my apps. I need to know: what would be the least-high system upgrade I can install in order to access the cloud on my new iPad 2? 
    MAC O.S. 10.5.8 - LEOPARD
    MacBookPro
    MacBookPro4,1
    Intel Core 2 Duo - 2.5 GHz; speed 800 MHz
    Quark Express 7.3
    Adobe Acrobat 8 Pro
    Adobe Photoshop CS 3
    Adobe Illustrator CS 3
    Adobe InDesign CS 3
    Microsoft Office 2008
    Extensis Suitcase Fusion 12.1.7
    Stuffit 12
    Thanx
    calico6

    Define "access the cloud". I can access my iCloud.com account on my 5 year old iMac at work running OS X 10.4.11 Tiger. I can download and upload Word documents and Pages documents in the iWorks section of my iCloud.com account.
    What do you want to access in "the cloud"?
    Snow Leopard would be your next system upgrade and you should be OK with the CS3 applications, and Office 2008. I cannot confirm that the other applications will work.
    This is quite old, but take a look or Google the other applications to see if they are compatible with SL.
    http://www.macintouch.com/specialreports/snowleopard/slcompat.html

  • How do you fix error message "data rate for this file is too high for DVD.  You must replace this file with one of a lower data rate".

    When trying to burn a DVD it will go through the encoding step and at 98% we see the message 'data rate for this file is too high for DVD.  You must replace this file with one of a lower data rate".  We need help to correct this so we can complete burning to DVD. 

    What did you export from Premiere?
    Did you use the MPEG2-DVD preset... and did you make any changes to the preset?
    CS5-thru-CC PPro/Encore tutorial list http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1448923 may help

  • Error message Translational currency is too high when posting GR for a PO

    Hi,
    I am trying to post a GR for a PO,with document currency say in GBP and local currency in EUR,when i tried to post a GR the system gives the message with-"Translational currency is too high" and also the value updated for previous GRs(for a qty 10) is vary high like 37,056,361,610.68     GBP,just i want to know how this value is picked by the system,i know exhange rate table maintained is plays important role,but the value i am getting is too high which is not at all related with rates we maintained in the table TCURR.
    I want to know why system is giving such a high value.     
    further PO quantity is 17,000 and net price is 1 GBP.
    we have posted very sucessfull GR earlier,but now this high value and error in GR  we are facing.
    with regards,

    Hi,
    Good afternoon and greetings,
    Wishing you a Happy New Year 2007
    Please go through the following OSS Note
    Note 191927 - Posting logic: GR for foreign currency PO
    Please reward points if found useful
    Thanking you
    With kindest regards
    Ramesh Padmanabhan

  • IMac Hard Drive expectations, Are mine too high?

    Hey everyone.
    I have a 27" iMac i5. Its around 22 months old now and its being used as a personal PC at home.
    Lately, I have been experiencing HDD related issues, It hangs, load times are poor, OS takes ages to boot (windows and OSX)
    I backed up all my data to external drives and did a clean OS restore to Lion. No help, first boot with the OS was just as bad as a boot full of clutter. Loading Windows on the win partition also sometimes gives me the "cannot find OS boot disk" error which is scary.
    Anyway's doing research its all sure tell-tale signs of a failing HDD and ironically last night on my Win7 partition, I got the windows error message saying my "windows detected a hard disk problem, back up all data and contact your manufacture".
    Now, back on topic. Is this reasonable? a $2000+ computer suffering from a hardware fault like this when the HDD has never had more than 30% of the 1TB used in its life? (everything I keep backed up on externals.)
    I was honestly expecting a few more years out of this, **** even my 5 year old Macbook has never had an issue in its life and its been bagged around more places I can think of in its lifetime. How does a computer that sits on a desk suffer for a hardware failure such as this?
    From day one, I had a faulty power board inside, it caused a loud electronic buzzing noise. I did not get this fixed for aroun 9 months as tbh, it sounded normal but in the last month leading upto the replacement, it got much louder over a few days. This was replaced by Apple and I was sent on my way happy it was fixed. could this have caused something to overload?
    I am a little bit bitter which I am sure you can understand, but was my expectation of this hard drive just too high? or am I in my right to be a little upset by this?
    And before anyone askes, I was OS when my warranty ran out, my Macbook, iPad 3XiPhones and Mac Mini are all covered by their own Apple Care. the only thing that isnt is the iMac.. just my luck!
    Edit: the old link for the power board.
    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/2737002

    Thanks guys.
    Just got off the phone to Applecare.
    they confirmed my drive is faulty. Im just a little upset it died like this. I have never had a drive fail before. Id rather my externals go than the internal.
    Spoke to Apple, they said that he spoke to his Tech Specalist and they would not offer a free replacement. I agree is its 10 months out of warranty, but even the Apple rep I was speaking too said he would not be impressed either if it was his personal computer
    Oh well. Time to look at HDD Upgrade options! Not that I am totally impressed about it.

  • F110 - not able to make the payment error - Check amts -ex rate is too high

    Hi Experts,
    While running F110 Iam getting the below error. The proposal runs fine. When I run the payment run the status shows "Payment run has been carried out" but no document has been generated. The log says-
    "Job started
    Step 001 started (program SAPF110S, variant &0000000004845, user ID DWARKID)
    Log for payment run for payment on 16.02.2011, identification I0038
    Check amounts - exchange rate is too high (       10,348.00395-)
    End of log
    Job finished
    Its saying Ex Rate is too high. Could you please let me know how to resolve this.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Dwarak

    Hello Vishwa,
    I tried with both the options. Still getting the same error.
    Please let me know what needs to be done.
    Job started
    Step 001 started (program SAPF110S, variant &0000000004848, user ID DWARAKID)
    Log for payment run for payment on 17.02.2011, identification I0038
    Check amounts - exchange rate is too high (       10,348.00395-)
    End of log
    Job finished
    Thanks & Regards,
    Dwarakanath

  • IPad Charger temperature goes too high

    I bought iPad Mini with Retina display recently. I attached a charger properly. After some time when i touched the charger I found its temperature is too high. So I removed and checked USB side of the cable, its temperature was so high that I could not hold it for more than 4-5 seconds. Is there any problem with my charger or this happens with every charger? What should I do?

    Possible sign of battery failure:
    1. Very hot when charging
    2. Not holding charge
    3. Takes a long time to charge
    How old is your battery?

  • PGC...data rate too high

    Hallo,
    message
    nunew33, "Mpeg not valid error message" #4, 31 Jan 2006 3:29 pm describes a certain error message. The user had problems with an imported MPEG movie.
    Now I receive the same message, but the MPEG that is causing the problem is created by Encore DVD itself!?
    I am working with the german version, but here is a rough translation of the message:
    "PGC 'Weitere Bilder' has an error at 00:36:42:07.
    The data rate of this file is too high for DVD. You must replace the file with one of a lower data rate. - PGC Info: Name = Weitere Bilder, Ref = SApgc, Time = 00:36:42:07"
    My test project has two menus and a slide show with approx. 25 slides and blending as transition. The menus are ok, I verified that before.
    First I thought it was a problem with the audio I use in the slide show. Because I am still in the state of learning how to use the application, I use some test data. The audio tracks are MP3s. I learned already that it is better to convert the MP3s to WAV files with certain properties.
    I did that, but still the DVD generation was not successful.
    Then I deleted all slides from the slide show but the first. Now the generation worked!? As far as a single slide (an image file) can not have a bitrate per second, and there was no sound any more, and as far as the error message appears AFTER the slide shows are generated, while Encore DVD is importing video and audio just before the burning process, I think that the MPEG that is showing the slide show is the problem.
    But this MPEG is created by Encore DVD itself. Can Encore DVD create Data that is not compliant to the DVD specs?
    The last two days I had to find out the cause for a "general error". Eventually I found out that image names must not be too long. Now there is something else, and I still have to just waste time for finding solutions for apparent bugs in Encore DVD. Why doesn't the project check find and tell me such problems? Problem is that the errors appear at the end of the generation process, so I always have to wait for - in my case - approx. 30 minutes.
    If the project check would have told me before that there are files with file names that are too long, I wouldn't have had to search or this for two days.
    Now I get this PGC error (what is PGC by the way?), and still have no clue, cause again the project check didn't mention anything.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Christian Kirchhoff

    Hallo,
    thanks, Ruud and Jeff, for your comments.
    The images are all scans of ancient paintings. And they are all rather dark. They are not "optimized", meaning they are JPGs right now (RGB), and they are bigger then the resolution for PAL 3:4 would require. I just found out that if I choose "None" as scaling, there is no error, and the generation of the DVD is much, much faster.
    A DVD with a slide show containing two slides and a 4 second transition takes about 3 minutes to generate when the scaling is set to something other than "None". Without scaling it takes approx. 14 seconds. The resulting movies size is the same (5,35 MB).
    I wonder why the time differs so much. Obviously the images have to be scaled to the target size. But it seems that the images are not scaled only once, that those scaled versions of the source images are cached, and those cached versions are used to generate then blend effect, but for every frame the source images seem to be scaled again.
    So I presume that the scaling - unfortunately - has an effect on the resulting movie, too, and thus influences the success of the process of DVD generation.
    basic situation:
    good image > 4 secs blend > bad image => error
    variations:
    other blend times don't cause an error:
    good image > 2 secs blend > bad image => success
    good image > 8 secs blend > bad image => success
    other transitions cause an error, too:
    good image > 4 secs fade to black > bad image => error
    good image > 4 secs page turn > bad image => error
    changing the image order prevents the error:
    bad image > 4 secs blend > good image => success
    changing the format of the bad image to TIFF doesn't prevent the error.
    changing colors/brightness of the bad image: a drastic change prevents the error. I adjusted the histogram and made everything much lighter.
    Just a gamma correction with values between 1.2 and 2.0 didn't help.
    changing the image size prevents the error. I decreased the size. The resulting image was still bigger than the monitor area, thus it still had to be scaled a bit by Encore DVD, but with this smaller version the error didn't occur. The original image is approx. 2000 px x 1400 px. Decreasing the size by 50% helped. Less scaling (I tried 90%, 80%, 70% and 60%, too) didn't help.
    using a slightly blurred version (gaussian blur, 2 px, in Photoshop CS) of the bad image prevents the error.
    My guess is that the error depends on rather subtle image properties. The blur doesn't change the images average brightness, the balance of colors or the size of the image, but still the error was gone afterwards.
    The problem is that I will work with slide shows that contain more images than two. It would be too time consuming to try to generate the DVD over and over again, look at which slide an error occurs, change that slide, and then generate again. Even the testing I am doing right now already "ate" a couple of days of my working time.
    Only thing I can do is to use a two image slide show and test image couple after image couple. If n is the number of images, I will spend (n - 1) times 3 minutes (which is the average time to create a two slides slide how with a blend). But of course I will try to prepare the images and make them as big as the monitor resolution, so Encore DVD doesn't have to scale the images any more. That'll make the whole generation process much shorter.
    If I use JPGs or TIFFs, the pixel aspect ratio is not preserved when the image is imported. I scaled one of the images in Photoshop, using a modified menu file that was installed with Encore DVD, because it already has the correct size for PAL, the pixel aspect ratio and the guides for the save areas. I saved the image as TIFF and as PSD and imported both into Encore DVD. The TIFF is rendered with a 1:1 pixel aspect ratio and NOT with the D1/DV PAL aspect ration that is stored in the TIFF. Thus the image gets narrowed and isn't displayed the way I wanted it any more. Only the PSD looks correct. But I think I saw this already in another thread...
    I cannot really understand why the MPEG encoding engine would produce bit rates that are illegal and that are not accepted afterwards, when Encore DVD is putting together all the stuff. Why is the MPEG encoding engine itself not throwing an error during the encoding process? This would save the developer so much time. Instead they have to wait until the end, thinking everything went right, and find out then that there was a problem.
    Still, if sometime somebody finds out more about the whole matter I would be glad about further explanations.
    Best regards,
    Christian

  • Video bit rate too high - reducing doesn't help

    I've not come across this problem before. Now DVDSP tells me my vbr is too high, but reducing it gives me the same message. I'm attempting to put 47mins of SD onto a DVD-R, so not outrageously demanding. I'm not sure where to go from here.

    John Howarth wrote:
    My problem is happening on a talking head - there is plenty of movement elsewhere in this movie, and that is all compressing correctly. When I reach this particular clip, which has very little movement, the glitches happen when the guy moves his head. It happens nowhere else in the whole 87 mins, and it happens repeatedly on re-encodes in the same clip - not precisely the same frames, but the same clip. Exporting the clip and its neighbours alone, and compressing it, presents no problem when written to a DVD-R
    It is strange, so in other words if Clips A, B, and C are all in one movie from Final Cut then the encode shows the problem in Clip B, let's say, but if you break down each section and drop each encoded clips (A,B,C) on a timeline in DVD SP then it looks okay? You mention that it is not the same frames each time, but are they near where the cuts/changes occur or is it throughot the entire section? Could be the encoder or perhaps the DVD Player is getting tripped up there. I have placed Compression markers in problem areas, even if not scene changes or high movement, to help when I had some ghosting with relatively slow rates of movement. I have not had to do it often, but it helped.
    Though I think it is probably not related to the following, how many players have you tried it on and which brand of DVD Media are you using? Do you see the same problem when playing from the hard drive in Apple DVD Player and/or the DVD-R in Apple DVD Player? How are you burning the DVD? Straight from DVD SP or otherwise? (You are using the Universal Binary version of DVD SP and Compressor I take it?)
    These problems all occur when using Compressor, at 6.2Mbps preset, with ac3 for the sound. Is that just too high? But then why does the rest of the movie play OK?
    It probably is not too high if everything else is okay, and more so it sounds like it is a place where there is not much movement. Moving his head should not throw things that far off. Did you mix clips/camera types in Final Cut? When you say glitches, what is happening, macroblocking, skips in playback, jerky movement? Ghosting?

Maybe you are looking for