NI-DAQ for WinXP 64bit Edition

Hello,
Does anyone know NI-DAQ is going to support WinXP 64bit Edition or the NI-DAQ 7.3 version can be installed on the Win64 already? Thank you!
Rolly

Hi Rolly,
The NI-DAQ driver is currently not supported. Please consider the following KnowledgeBase article for more details:
Are National Instruments Products Compatible with Windows XP 64-bit for AMD's x86-64 Technology?
Thanks,
Lesley Y.

Similar Messages

  • Release dates of Audigy drivers for Windows 64bit Edit

    Hello,
    Just wondering if anyone has a more accurate date of when x64 drivers will become available for Audigy cards (I own a SB0090 if that is of any use.) I don't know how long I'm going to last with no sound
    Thanks!

    Hi Milstark,
    Welcome to the HP Forums, I hope you enjoy your experience!
    I understand you want to know if there will be Win 8.1 drivers released.
    I will be happy to help you.
    Here is the URL for Win 8.1 32 bit drivers that are available.
    HP LaserJet Full Feature Software and Driver.
    This is a Link for the Win 8.1 64 bit drivers.
    HP LaserJet Full Feature Software and Driver.
    Please clarify if you aren't able to install the printer.
    Are you getting any error mesages?
    Printer isn't being detected?
    Thank you for posting on the HP Forums.
    Have a nice day!
    Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
    Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks” for helping!
    Gemini02
    I work on behalf of HP

  • How to set classpath in WinXP Home edition

    Hello everyone,
    Recently I have try to run the HelloWorld java code, but it come up with a error. (Exception in thread �main� java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: HelloWorld)
    Java programming Code:
    public class HelloWorld {
    public static void main (String args[]) {
    System.out.println("Hello World!");
    I also try to compile another simple program, and it come up with the simpler error, (Exception in thread �main� java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Add16And23)
    Java programming Code:
    public class Add16And23
         public static void main (String[] args)
              int sum;
              sum=16+23;
              System.out.println("The sum of 16 and 23 is " + sum);
    HOW CAN I FIX THIS, I read other threads before, it say some about class path.
    Do anyone know how to set it, in winXP?
    Do anyone know the whole path that I should put in, in winXP?
    What should I type in the (User variables for windows) and (System variables).
    I have :
    * (j2eesdk-1_4-dr-windows-eval) downloaded and installed;
    *WinXP Home edition Version 2002 Service Pack 1
    * My current Java path are (C:\Sun\AppServer\jdk\bin) in the (User variables for windows).
    Please help!!!
    Thank you all!!!

    I'm also windows xp.
    fllowing example:
    java_home=c:\j2sdk1.4.2_03\bin
    classpath=c:\j2sdk1.4.2_03\dt.jar;c:\j2sdk1.4.2_03\tool
    .jarThis won't fix a thing.
    When you run, do it like this:
    java -classpath . HelloWorldNote the "dot" after -classpath. That tells the class loader to look in the current directory for the .class files it needs.
    Read about how to run the javac.exe and java.exe tools in your javadocs. You'll have to learn about CLASSPATH. - MOD

  • [TV@Master] Winxp 64bit driver?

    Anyone know if there is going to be support for winxp 64 or longhorn?  Been thinking of upgrading but this is the 1 of 2 hardware I have that I dont think will work.

    hi there,
    i got this back from MSI on 5/20/05  about xp pro 64 bit and the TV@nywhere master.
    Quote:
    Dear Customer,
    All 64bit drivers will be release by the beginning of June of 2005 which then we will have the drivers for download.
    The tuner card does not support 64bit as of now since we are pushing the vendor for support.
    Sincerely,                                         
    Technical Support Division
    MSI Computer Corp.
    http://www.msicomputer.com
    MSI Platinum Series Motherboards -- In Pursuit of Quality Perfection.
    1-626-913-0828
    1-626-581-7721 Fax
    End Quote:

  • How is this for a PC spec for home video editing?

    OK - we've decided to get the new PC now, focused around decent performance for video editing at home when we do it.   Any feedback on the below would be greatly appreciated.  I've tried to put in my "principles", but as you note I've highlighted some questions around these. 
    Principles
    * Decent computer for Home Video Editing - so when we do it want it to be reasonable from a performance point of view (not annoying).  Also want assurance for the video data that a single HDD crash won't mean lost data.
    * Hard Drive Configuration - Assume RAID 1 for data
    C: 500GB - Operating System (1 x 500GB)
    D: 500GB - Swap Area for O/S (1 x 500GB)
    E: RAID 1 Redundancy for Data ( 2 x 1TB )
    * 64 bit Windows 7 Pro
    * Questions re Principles
    Is it really worth having a separate drive (D: drive) for Swap?
    Is there any real need to have a drive F: (another one) for exports?  This is non-real time so it shouldn't be an issue should it?
    Any major improvement re moving say the C: drive to SSD? (or not worth the $$)
    SATA II versus SATA III drives? (I've assumed both are ok when picking)
    The Spec
    CPU - Intel Core i7 960 Processor LGA1366 3.2GHz 8MB Cache CPU 
    Motherboard - Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R X58+ICH10R QPI 6.4GT/s DDR3 2000 PCI-Ex16 SATAII SATA3 USB3.0 RAID GLAN ATX
    RAM - Kingston 12GB(3X4G) KIT 1333MHz(PC3-10600)
    Video Card - NVIDIA GTX560 - Gigabyte GTX560 OC 1G GDDR5 PCIE DualLink DVI  [?? matches motherboard / is this overkill ??]
    RAID Card - Adaptec AAR1220SA-SGL SATAII RAID0 1 JBOD/2 PORT/Low Profile/PCIEx1/OEM/No Cables [?? is this ok - seems cheap ??]
    HDD (non-RAID) - 2 x Western Digital 500G RE4 SATAII 7200rpm HDD 64MB Enterprise [?? only SATAII this is ok no??]
    Case - CoolerMaster RC-942-KKN1 HAF X 942 Black No PSU [?? is this overkill - just took someone recommendation here ??]
    Power Supply - Corsair HX-850 ATX Power Supply w 140mm Modular Cables [?? power ok?  again just took a recommendation ??]
    O/S - 64bit - Microsoft Windows 7 Pro 64bit OEM(Microsoft OEM Terms&condition apply)
    Note - I'm looking at the following local site re where to source if this assists: http://www.umart.com.au

    Greg (correct me if that's not correct!),
    You're spec. looks like a great start for what you are trying to do. I have a few comments, and also two questions!
    Comments:
    - Spec. generally looks fine
    - I particularly like your case and p/s choices!
    - For a home PC, you may consider bumping up your OS choice to Ultimate, which adds some nice multimedia capabilities
    - Regarding the D drive for swap (and I assume you mean Premiere Pro media cache and media cache database too) will definitely speed up aspects of Premiere Pro, but likely be unnoticeable for other home PC day to day use. Why not build out the system and decide then if you need the extra speed for Premiere Pro - it is so easy to add something like that later.
    - I'd vote no regarding a need for a F output drive for this system
    - Regarding your OS drive... Speed and responsiveness versus cost - what do you choose? This really is a personal choice. I will say that a 2x1TB RAID 0 OS boot array would probably be a bigger step up in performance than a similar priced SSD option and a 2xSSD (60 to 80GB) array will perform better than a single larger SSD.
    - Sata II vs Sata III - I have some of each now, and I would agree with other posters and articles on the Internet that say the often larger cache size on the Sata III models is more important than the Sata III interface. Keep going like you are going, with the assumption that both are OK.
    - finally, your CPU; personnaly, with the new lower cost pricing on the i7-970, I'd suggest you downgrade to a i7-950 and same some money or upgrade to the 32nm 6-core i7-970 CPU and jump to a significantly new level of performance and power per watt
    Questions:
    - what version of Premier Pro will you be running?
    - what will be your workflow (i.e. DV, Sony consumer AVCHD, Canon DSLR, etc.)?
    Cheers,
    Jim

  • MOVED: MSI Live Update not working Windows XP Professional 64bit Edition!!!

    This topic has been moved to Operating Systems.
    MSI Live Update not working Windows XP Professional 64bit Edition!!!

    Thank you so much. I just want to say I really appreciate when people do take the time to post me in return. So I really mean it, Thank You.
    A quick question. You see, I have been upgrading my computer. I installed a Belkin USB USB Card (high speed 2.0) cause I needed more USB ports. Then I checked for compatable RAM and upgraded my RAM from 512MB to 2Gigs. Everything alright.
    Now, I have checked for processors that are compatable with my board K9VGM-V (MS-7253). And MSI's chart says mine is compatable with the AMD Athlon 2x 6000 (3.0Ghz) *IF* I use the 89 watt and not the 125 watt. Here is a good URL for the processor details I found:
    http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/K8/AMD-Athlon%2064%20X2%206000+%20-%20ADA6000IAA6CZ%20(ADA6000CZBOX).html
    Now do you have any tips and I will probably have to flash to BIOS for sure after this upgrade won't I?

  • CS4 GPU works fine in WinXP 64bit -with some tweaking

    For several weeks I was unable to get the CS4 GPU accelleration working under WinXP 64 bit (not officially supported by Adobe). I spent hours on the phone with ATI and a bit of time w Adobe also. No sucess with my ATI FireGL V3600 which works fine with DAZ Studio showing full textures in the View window and does decent and very fast renders.
    Afte I gave up and started building a Vista 64bit machine, I saw a post from Slim_W who got GPU accelleration working fine with his very expensive FL card.
    I had already gone through installing latest drivers, running special Adobe Reg patching utility files etc.
    When I checked ATI, I saw there was brand new driver available. I downloaded and installed, ran the Adobe utility and GPU Accelleration works beautifully.
    Read more here:
    http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1004&message=30072969
    Anyone else who is using WinXP 64bit might find this info useful.
    Dan

    For several weeks I was unable to get the CS4 GPU accelleration working under WinXP 64 bit (not officially supported by Adobe). I spent hours on the phone with ATI and a bit of time w Adobe also. No sucess with my ATI FireGL V3600 which works fine with DAZ Studio showing full textures in the View window and does decent and very fast renders.
    Afte I gave up and started building a Vista 64bit machine, I saw a post from Slim_W who got GPU accelleration working fine with his very expensive FL card.
    I had already gone through installing latest drivers, running special Adobe Reg patching utility files etc.
    When I checked ATI, I saw there was brand new driver available. I downloaded and installed, ran the Adobe utility and GPU Accelleration works beautifully.
    Read more here:
    http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1004&message=30072969
    Anyone else who is using WinXP 64bit might find this info useful.
    Dan

  • Photoshop CS6 - 64bit Edition wont hold print settings but 32bit version will.

    Hello all, I really hope somebody can help me with this issue.
    I work in an educational establishment and we have both 32 and 64bit versions of Photoshop CS6 (Predominately 64x) and for some reason when you go to print and change paper size, scaling e.t.c when you hit 'Ok' it reverts back to the default which is "Paper Size - Letter" e.t.c. Meaning I have to transfer it into another program - like save it as a PDF and print it through that in order to print on larger paper sizes and scaling options. Strangely the 32x edition doesn't have this problem.
    I've been through settings, attempted reinstall. Even going through the settings of the 32x and making sure everything is identical to the 64x set up.
    Please tell me I'm missing something simple here because this has become a real melon scratcher for me.
    Any Help is Appreciated.
    Chris J
    (Finchy911)

    Apologies.
    System info:
    Windows 7 Enterprise 64Bit Edition - Intel I7 (3.40Ghz) - 16Gb RAM - Nvidea Gforce GTX 660
    Windows 8 Enterprise 64Bit Edition - (Specs same as above)
    Printers used/problem observed on:
    HP Designjet t7100 using driver as follows
    Driver Name: PrintQueue.inf
    Class Guid: {1ED2BBF9-11F0-4084-B21F-AD83A8E6DCDC}
    Driver Date: 06/21/2006
    Driver Version: 6.3.9600.16384
    This would be the printer we most observe the problem on as its a large format printer and Photoshop wont allow us to print in anything above 'Letter'.
    The Printer is a networked printer that is hosted on our Windows 2008 Server R2 and shared to the rest of the PCs in our organization through that server.
    As previously mentioned the 32bit edition of Photoshop doesn't appear to have any issues printing with custom settings but the 64bit edition ALWAYS reverts back to default Paper size and scaling.
    Once again apologies for the lack of information.

  • Windows XPP 64bit Edition

    I suppose the 64bit edition is perfect for use on the c2d via boot camp?
    cheers

    Hi,
    I disagree with that statement
    The main problem with using XP64 with BootCamp is, that Apple doesn't provide any kind of drivers for it.
    If you want to use XP64, you have to search the internet for yourself to get at least the basic drivers for chipset; NIC; graphics; etc.
    Even then you won't find any Drivers for Mac specific hardware like iSight, keyboard etc.
    Right now Apple only provides drivers for XP32 and Vista32 with the exception of the new Mac Pros which also come with drivers for Vista64.
    Regards
    Stefan

  • 6602: How to use 8 counters simultaneously in C++ using traditional Daq for frequency measurement

    Hi Everybody;
    I'm new to Ni-DAQ cards and working on NI PCI-6602 Card in Borland C++, I should use Traditional DAQ for my project. Now I want to use all the 8 counters simultaneously for frequency measurement.
    1.Where should I connect my External signal, to source or gate, at present I have connected to source.
    2. How to set parameters and start the counters simultaneously, what are the parameters to be set for frequency measurement.
    3.How to start counting.(parameter settings)
    4.Should I set any PFI Lines or by default are they set to counters.
    status = GPCTR_Set_Application (1, gpctrNum, ND_SIMPLE_EVENT_CNT)
    status = GPCTR_Change_Parameter (1, gpctrNum, paramID, paramValue)
    iStatus = GPCTR_Watch(1, gpctrNum, ND_ARMED, entityValue);
    status = GPCTR_Watch (deviceNumber, gpctrNum,ND_COUNT, entityValue)
    what is the paramID in my case, Clear and appropriate answers would be very helpful and thanks in advance.
    Message Edited by Pavan K on 07-11-2009 12:38 AM

      I have made a program with LabVIEW 5.1 based on NI 6602, in which four counters were used.
      Counter 3 is used to generate pulses, which are directed to the gates of counter 0, 1 and 2. 
      The source terminals of counter 0,1 and 2 receive pulses, individually, to count how many pulses appear during the time interval of each gate pulse.
      The results are stored in a data file.
      In order to test its performance, only one signal of ramdom pulses is sent to counter 0,1 and 2.
      But I find that at the beginning the counts for the three counters are the same, but the following counts are totally different!
      What's wrong? And how to solve such a problem? Does it have something related with synchronization?
      Thank you very much!

  • Running on WinXp Home Edition?

    Hi, i'm currently using Forte for Java Internet Edition 2.0 to develop a web application. It runs well on Windows2000 Professionla and Server Vesion. But it has several errors when i try to run it on WindowXP (both are server side, not client side). The Tomcat and MySQL is well implemented. The errors i get are something like one or more of my functions got problems.
    Can anyone tell me what's wrong with the web application? and Can winXP run JSP-based web application as server side?
    Any feedback is greately appreciated.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Jacky

    On Win2k:
    Web Server:Jakarta-Tomcat-3.2.3
    JVM: JDK1.3.1
    IDE: Forte for Java, Internet Edition 2.0
    Database: MySQL 4.0.0 alpha-nt
    MySQL Driver: MySQL Connector 3.0 Beta version
    Browser: Internet Explorer 5.0
    On WinXP
    Web Server:Jakarta-Tomcat-3.2.3
    JVM: JDK1.3.1
    IDE: Forte for Java, Internet Edition 2.0
    Database: MySQL 4.0.0 alpha-nt
    MySQL Driver: MySQL Connector 3.0 Beta version
    Browser: Internet Explorer 6.0
    The web application that i designed is fine when running on Win2k, but return erros when executed certain procedures/functions.
    Further question: Can winXP home edition support JSP? or JSP is well supported only by winXP professional ? Please advice.

  • X121e for mild photo editing?

    Hi there all,
    As you can see I am new to this forum. I currently have an MSI Wind U130, which I've used for mild photo editing when on the move. I've found the screen to be satisfactory when compared to prints.
    I have been looking at the lenovoa x121e and was wondering if anyone could tell me what the screen is like in comparison to my current netbook?  
    Any help would be greatly appreciated .
    Thank you all! 

    I just received my x121e (AMD Fusion model with 4GB RAM) and I'm quite happy with the performance in photo editing situations.
    I've got the Adobe Web Premium suite installed and Photoshop (64bit) runs acceptably, there's only few instances where I'm really struggling.
    Then again, it's always going to be personal, what I consider 'OK' might not be 'OK' for you. It's just a matter how patient one is.
    In terms of the screen I'm happywith it, even more so than my Dell 15.4" 1920x1200 laptop, mainly because the backlighting of my Dell laptop is uneven, in particular the corners. The Lenovo doesn't suffer any of those problems and is even brighter.
    In terms of colour accuracy I can't really comment and if that's your main concern I suppose someone else would have to give you a better answer. All I can say is that it doesn't look obviously 'warm' or 'cool' which has been obvious in some other screens I've seen.
    I was really excited about the x121e as it was not a 'netbook' and that it ran a proper version of Windows where I could actually make good use of the Adobe Creative Suite I was planning on installing. I'm not dissapointed so far.
    Hope it helps.

  • Google Analytics OPT-OUT Browser Add-on 0.9.6 doesn't retain OPT-OUT settings...never did really. Also JAVA now refuses to create updates for WinXP/FireFox.

    I use PaleMoon now trying to get rid of advertising sharks. I have WINXP still - need assistive-technology computer for pain so taking time on getting new computer.
    I have been severely sabotaged by advertising conglomerates selling my private information. They have no right -yet they do whatever they want. Anyhow...I've tried to OPT-OUT of EVERYTHING POSSIBLE. I've tried 5 places found. Google, NAI, DAA, & FIREFOX HELP said go to about:config was instructed to turn "from false to true" the "privacy.tracking.protection.enabled" .But I couldn't keep this setting because this also has to be set to false to use any saved log-on's to my accounts., and add-on AD BLOCK PLUS 2.6.7 when I was on Firefox & had some ticks and now it is disabled because it won't work with PaleMoon 25.2.1
    This case is about GOOGLE OPT-OUT. Starting here: http://www.google.com/settings/ads?hl=en&sig=ACi0TCgWymel0CNWxdcnEWPzWNs9wDd7cVQHxHsmtz4w30CAyHk7MqyzzZdGh3m6FpDaJsKmunTLEvJZY5LAm3h6gIdzE30L-Q
    There are 2 columns. The left one "ADS ON GOOGLE" NEVER RETAINS AFTER LOG-OFF. The right column "Google ads across the web
    " seems to retain sometimes - if I remember right it falls off after a period of time as opposed to after just LOGGING-OFF. Below the columns there are options, but I don't have a GOOGLE ACCOUNT.
    Also down there is this link: https://support.google.com/adsense/troubleshooter/1631343?hl=en ...you see the box with this: Advertising industry program participation
    Google is a participating member of groups that have developed industry privacy standards like the Ad-Choices icon for online advertising.
    Group Location
    Network Advertising Initiative United States
    Digital Advertising Alliance (DAA) United States
    European Digital Advertising Alliance Europe
    Digital Advertising Alliance of Canada Canada
    ....I clicked OPTED OUT FOR NAI on their link http://www.networkadvertising.org/
    ...I clicked OPTED OUT FOR DAA on their link http://www.aboutads.info/
    ...I clicked PROTECT MY CHOICES and downloaded the app.
    These 1st 2 links used to have the same trouble and didn't retain ANYTHING and wouldn't re OPT-OUT ANY UNTIL THEY WERE SATIATED - saying I didn't have 3rd party cookies allowed when I did - this took hours.
    I sent numerous trouble reports to them that they ignored - then I think I sent one to Firefox and it is much better but still not completely right. Today DAA retains 106 out of 122 and if I repeatedly RE-OPT-OUT successively I can get it to 121 out of 122 - never completely. (currently the one not taking is Accuen Inc. but it changes periodically - makes me think they set one up to take my info and then share it with all of them - lol )
    Same for NAI currently I started with 94 out of 96 - next re-OPTED-OUT got it to 95 out of 96 and no further and same co. Accuen Inc (accuenmedia.com ) wouldn't update.
    NOTE: I was copy/pasting the list of NON-OPT-OUT'S to them and my own document file to try and find trends/problems...now NAI programmers protected the list from being able to be COPIED AND PASTED!!! That's the opposite of being open and interested in making this work, right? Why would they want to allow us to OPT-OUT of their criminal espionage behavior...RIGHT? (lol) FYI: I recorded that the big one that was always retained before this one was...MEDIA MATH INC.
    MANY Opt-outs would drop off while on-line and ALL would drop-off once logged-off. Now it's retaining most once logged off - but it hasn't been long enough to tell if they'll fall back into their bad habits as they've done before...
    This has been going on forever for me - I've been reporting this malfunction since 2013.
    Of course I downloaded PROTECT MY CHOICES FOR FIREFOX via NAI AND DAA'S links ...http://www.aboutads.info/PMC#protect-your-choices-for-firefox ............they both go to the same place???.....PROTECT MY CHOICES http://www.aboutads.info/plugin/install/firefox....that seems odd...it's as if they are the same entity then. ABOUTADS is DAA'S WEBSITE. NAI'S IS NETWORKADVERTISING.ORG so why would NAI use DAA'S PROTECT MY CHOICES app?
    Lastely, I also requested that the COOKIES NAMES BE UNIFORMLY IDENTIFIABLE. All the OPT-OUT COOKIES that are to be forevermore retained on my computer and that I am to trust the EVERY FUNCTION OF - well they all have different COOKIE NAMES!! Most of the names you can not tell that they are OPT-OUT COOKIES!! - SO NOWWW They have created another problem.
    We can no longer just "DELETE ALL COOKIES".
    PLUS, we can no longer go through our cookies and delete individual ones that snuck through.
    Every one of the OPT-OUT COOKIES SHOULD SAY "OPT-OUT" IWITHIN THEIR NAME OF THEIR COOKIE - PERIOD. RIGHT? (LOL) For real. Why was this mess was allowed?
    REALLY IN MY OPINION THESE COMPANIES SHOULD BE BLOCKED AT THE LOCAL PHONE COMPANIES LEVEL - IN OUR SERVERS. We should not have to deal with them. Same thing with viruses, malware and such beasts. But I digress.
    In summary:
    1.)Google Analytics OPT-OUT Browser Add-on 0.9.6 doesn't retain OPT-OUT settings
    2.) JAVA refuses to create updates for WinXP/FireFox/PaleMoon.
    3.) DAA & NAI still don't retain ALL OPT-OUT settings and never completely OPT-OUT all companies.
    4.) OPT-OUT cookies should be uniformly names with the words OPT-OUT in their titles.
    5.) Ad Block Plus 25.6.7 doesn't work for Pale Moon and there is no alternative - (didn't work great in FireFox)
    Right now I'm mainly interested in #1)retaining my GOOGLE OPT-OUTS while on line AND while logged off since it is attacking my computer and steeling all the speed until it freezes my keyboard.
    Currently I am trying to remember to run through 3. OPT-OUTS every time I log on.
    Thanks so much!

    hello, palemoon's support forums are here: http://forum.palemoon.org/

  • Considering dumping my iMac for a PC used for DSLR video editing on Premiere CS6. Help!

    So I edit mostly 1080p DSLR footage taken from my canon T3i camera. I purchased a 2011 (the latest model) iMac a little over a year ago, upgraded the RAM to 12GB and it has worked reasonably well. I purchased the base model for $1200 which has a quad core i5 processor, 512mb of video ram, and a measly 500gb hard drive. The past couple of days I have come to the realization that I only use Adobe Programs for graphically intensive work (premiere, after effects, etc). I originally bought my iMac for final cut, but FCPX SUCKS and I switched to Premiere CS6 which works like a dream. Anyways, I'm a senior in high school and do lots of video editing (going to major in video production in college). I'm likely going to differ college for a year and continue my video production business (pretty informal) as well as video production internships at a couple companies (so don't suggest that I get a laptop for portability, not an issue). I just shot an entire wedding with 2 DSLR's and the footage takes up over 20% of my hard drive which is unacceptable. This is very troublesome for me and has been clogging up my computer considerably. I have realized it would make a lot of sense to sell my iMac and purchase a PC that's not only faster, but has much more space. I was ideally looking to sell my iMac for $1000, and from that get a better and faster PC setup for my video editing. $200 would be allocated for a 24" 1080p LED 5ms Asus monitor (from newegg) which would leave $800 remaining for the PC. Ideally it'd be nice to have a little cash left over. Some things that sound appealing to me are: an intel i7 quad core proccessor at least 3.0+ Ghz,  16 GB of ram (maybe 8 to start), 1 GB of video RAM (here is where I'm stuck, my Imac had a Radeon 512mb video card in it, but I've heard premiere runs especially well with nVidia CUDA cards? Don't really know too much about this stuff.) I have no idea what type of card to get, and if I would even see a performance upgrade from my iMac. For storage I'd like at least 2TB of space, should I get two seperate 1 TB drives? One for boot and software and another for video files? Anyways, I assume I can benefit from selling my 2011 i5 iMac to get a faster PC equivalent at a lower price since I mainly edit videos (which is pretty graphically intense) from an HD DSLR camera. I've noticed premiere rendering times on my mac are starting to get pretty slow these days. Ideally it'd be nice to buy a desktop (already assembled) maybe from HP for around $600 (not including the monitor). I'm not completely against building a PC from parts (since I know a friend who can do it for me) I just need help figuring out WHAT exactly it is that I need and would benefit from.

    Buy a Desktop Video Editing PC
    http://www.adkvideoediting.com/
    -ADK Kudos http://forums.adobe.com/thread/877201
    Build a Desktop Video Editing PC
    -http://ppbm7.com/index.php/intro-part-1
    -http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1098759
    -http://forums.adobe.com/thread/878520?tstart=0
    -http://forums.adobe.com/thread/815798
    -http://www.shawnlam.ca/2012/premiere-pro-cs6-video-editing-computer-build/
    -http://www.videoguys.com/Guide/E/Videoguys+DIY9+Its+Time+for+Sandy+Bridge+E/0xe9b142f408a2 b03ab88144a434e88de7.aspx

  • Need help to choose a DAQ for simultaneous sampling

    We need to choose a DAQ for simultaneous sampling. The restrictions are:
    a) 2 channels
    b) The signals on both channels are not continuous. A valid input on the channels is signaled by a falling edge in a third line that can be used as a trigger.
    c) The rate of these signals can be up to 50000 per second but they do not arrive in a periodic way.
    d) The timing:
    The trigger is a pulse of 600 ns
    The signals on the channels are stable 200ns before the leading edge of the trigger pulse and remain stable for 900ns.
    We have seen the PCI-6143 but we are not sure if it is the best choice.
    We have some questions:
    1) Does the 6143 fulfill the timing requirements ?
    2) Is it posible and easy to set the board to take one sample after the trigger ?
    3) Is there a better choice than the 6143 to solve the problem ?
    4) Can we solve this problem programming in VB or VC++ and using the software that comes with the board or do we need to buy extra libraries ?

    1) Does the 6143 fulfill the timing requirements ?
    Yes, the 6143 should fulfill these requirements. It has a 250 KS/s sampling rate per channel which should give you 5x oversampling at the 50 kHz maximum bandwidth you indicated. The minimum delay from the recognition of the trigger to the first sample on this board is 100 ns which falls within the 900 ns window.
    2) Is it posible and easy to set the board to take one sample after the trigger ?
    It's not clear to me whether you want to take a single sample after a trigger and stop or use the trigger as an external sample clock to acquire several samples at the rate of the trigger. In either case, it's possible and relatively easy to do so. The only quirk is that the minimum number of samples to acquire for a hardware timed acquisition is two samples. This means if you really only want one point after the trigger, you'll have to setup the hardware to acquire two samples and then throw the second one away in software.
    3) Is there a better choice than the 6143 to solve the problem ?
    This seems like a pretty solid choice for the application you described. However, you didn't mention what the amplitude of your input signals are. The 6143 has a fixed +/- 5 volt range. If this isn't sufficient, you'll have to provide signal conditioning or choose a board with a wider input range. Also, I'm assuming your trigger signal is a TTL signal. If it's an analog signal, you'll want to choose a board with an analog trigger circuit (the 6143 doesn't have an analog trigger). The PCI-6111 is a 2 channel board with a +/- 42 volt input range, an analog trigger, a 5 MS/s sampling rate, and will also meet all of your requirements. The only down side of the 6111 is that it is more expensive and is a 12 bit converter instead of 16 bit. The PCI-6120 has even more functionality than the 6111 and has a 16 bit converter at 800 KS/s. PXI has some more simultaneous offerings, but I'm assuming you want to stick with PCI. You can also check out some of our modular instrument offerings such as the PCI-5102. I'm not as familiar with the modular instruments, so you'll have to check out the specs for yourself. Whether there is a better choice or not is pretty subjective. That will depend on how much you're willing to spend for the features and specs you really care about. From the information you provided, the 6143 will be the lowest cost solution that meets the requirements you specified.
    4) Can we solve this problem programming in VB or VC++ and using the software that comes with the board or do we need to buy extra libraries ?
    The DAQmx driver provides interfaces to both of these programming environments at no extra cost.

Maybe you are looking for